Matt and Erin take this one straight on: why autism “awareness” looks the way it does—and who built it that way.

This is about power, bad science, and what happens when non-autistic voices control the narrative.

Highlights from this episode:
• Why outdated theories (like “lack of theory of mind”) still shape diagnosis, services, and public understanding—and why they don’t actually hold up in real autistic lives
• How research built on young, white, cis boys created a distorted definition of autism that leaves most people out
• The difference between self-identification and medical diagnosis—and why one is about knowing yourself, while the other is about access and gatekeeping
• How capitalism shows up in autism: “functioning levels,” ABA, productivity, and who gets labeled valuable (yeah… we go there)
• What gets missed when clinicians only trust what they can observe—and ignore lived experience entirely
• Real examples of how autistic joy (like deep interests and repetition) gets mislabeled as a problem instead of understood as regulation and meaning
• Why listening to autistic people isn’t optional—it’s the only way this starts to make sense

There’s also some real talk about burnout in the field, misdiagnosis, and the quiet harm of “bad reports” written inside broken systems.

And yeah—this one gets a little chaotic (on purpose). Because the system is chaotic. And trying to force simple answers onto complex autistic lives? That’s part of the problem.