
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, Jim Garrity discusses a brand-new deposition-related decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, whose jurisdiction spans Florida, Georgia and Alabama. The appeals court held that a party should be able to depose witnesses if there is a reasonable basis to do so, even where the adversary claims the witnesses know nothing, and even if the witnesses themselves file affidavits swearing they know nothing. Witnesses who may have knowledge, the Court held, should be subject to cross-examination, and should not escape scrutiny through the use of an affidavit alone. Garrity ends the episode, as always, with practice tips and observations.
The case is Akridge v. Alfa Mutual Insurance Company, 2021 WL 2520631, Case No.19-10827 (11th Cir. June 21, 2021).
By Jim Garrity5
9898 ratings
In this episode, Jim Garrity discusses a brand-new deposition-related decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, whose jurisdiction spans Florida, Georgia and Alabama. The appeals court held that a party should be able to depose witnesses if there is a reasonable basis to do so, even where the adversary claims the witnesses know nothing, and even if the witnesses themselves file affidavits swearing they know nothing. Witnesses who may have knowledge, the Court held, should be subject to cross-examination, and should not escape scrutiny through the use of an affidavit alone. Garrity ends the episode, as always, with practice tips and observations.
The case is Akridge v. Alfa Mutual Insurance Company, 2021 WL 2520631, Case No.19-10827 (11th Cir. June 21, 2021).

32,090 Listeners

30,638 Listeners

43,570 Listeners

16,353 Listeners

461 Listeners

26,395 Listeners

9,484 Listeners

56,391 Listeners

186 Listeners

5,759 Listeners

16,030 Listeners

48 Listeners

737 Listeners

10,779 Listeners

8,393 Listeners