Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Episode 83: Popper's Second Axis (aka Bruce's Epistemology?)
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Episode 83: Popper's Second Axis (aka Bruce's Epistemology?)
Bruce summarizes his (unique?) understanding of Karl Popper’s epistemology that (possibly?) straddles the line between orthodox and unorthodox and is Influenced both by Deutsch, more old school Popperians, and his own unique interpretation of critical rationalism.
Bruce claims that the key difference between regular "folk epistemology" (i.e. how humans reason without a correct understanding of epistemology) and "Popper's epistemology" (aka "Critical Rationalism" or the correct epistemology) is due to Popper's epistemology having a 'second axis' that regular folk epistemology entirely lacks. This 'second axis' is rooted in a choice to make your theories bold and risky by maximizing empirical content.
This makes Popper's epistemology 2-dimensional instead of 1-dimensional.
If this fact is missed, Bruce claims your epistemology collapses back to be regular old folk epistemology and you are no longer doing critical rationalism.
Refutation, corroboration, explanation, induction, falsification, verisimilitude, “the Popperian war on words,” and “Popper’s ratchet” -- from past podcasts! -- are all touched upon.
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/bnielson01
View all episodes
By Bruce Nielson and Peter Johansen
5
2525 ratings
Bruce summarizes his (unique?) understanding of Karl Popper’s epistemology that (possibly?) straddles the line between orthodox and unorthodox and is Influenced both by Deutsch, more old school Popperians, and his own unique interpretation of critical rationalism.
Bruce claims that the key difference between regular "folk epistemology" (i.e. how humans reason without a correct understanding of epistemology) and "Popper's epistemology" (aka "Critical Rationalism" or the correct epistemology) is due to Popper's epistemology having a 'second axis' that regular folk epistemology entirely lacks. This 'second axis' is rooted in a choice to make your theories bold and risky by maximizing empirical content.
This makes Popper's epistemology 2-dimensional instead of 1-dimensional.
If this fact is missed, Bruce claims your epistemology collapses back to be regular old folk epistemology and you are no longer doing critical rationalism.
Refutation, corroboration, explanation, induction, falsification, verisimilitude, “the Popperian war on words,” and “Popper’s ratchet” -- from past podcasts! -- are all touched upon.
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/bnielson01
More shows like The Theory of Anything
View all
Making Sense with Sam Harris
26,366 Listeners
The Tim Ferriss Show
16,125 Listeners
Conversations with Tyler
2,409 Listeners
Philosophy For Our Times
305 Listeners
ToKCast
91 Listeners
Naval
2,137 Listeners
Within Reason
1,562 Listeners
Do Explain with Christofer Lövgren
23 Listeners
Machine Learning Street Talk (MLST)
90 Listeners
Increments
17 Listeners
Dwarkesh Podcast
426 Listeners
Theories of Everything with Curt Jaimungal
467 Listeners
Robinson's Podcast
257 Listeners
The Falsifiable Podcast
5 Listeners
BG2Pod with Brad Gerstner and Bill Gurley
465 Listeners