
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In this episode, Jim Garrity discusses a question he got from a lawyer whose corporate opponent refused to make the CEO available for deposition under the "apex doctrine." Garrity explains the advice he gave, which was to immediately notice a designated-representative deposition under Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6). He also discusses the value of designated-representative depositions in arbitration, where - because of sharp restrictions on the number of depositions that can be taken - many witnesses will similarly be off-limits.
5
9696 ratings
In this episode, Jim Garrity discusses a question he got from a lawyer whose corporate opponent refused to make the CEO available for deposition under the "apex doctrine." Garrity explains the advice he gave, which was to immediately notice a designated-representative deposition under Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6). He also discusses the value of designated-representative depositions in arbitration, where - because of sharp restrictions on the number of depositions that can be taken - many witnesses will similarly be off-limits.
30,847 Listeners
6,283 Listeners
26,395 Listeners
454 Listeners
674 Listeners
111,388 Listeners
56,111 Listeners
32,458 Listeners
9,536 Listeners
12,010 Listeners
6,639 Listeners
6,235 Listeners
5,968 Listeners
15,246 Listeners
666 Listeners