
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, Jim Garrity discusses a question he got from a lawyer whose corporate opponent refused to make the CEO available for deposition under the "apex doctrine." Garrity explains the advice he gave, which was to immediately notice a designated-representative deposition under Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6). He also discusses the value of designated-representative depositions in arbitration, where - because of sharp restrictions on the number of depositions that can be taken - many witnesses will similarly be off-limits.
By Jim Garrity5
9898 ratings
In this episode, Jim Garrity discusses a question he got from a lawyer whose corporate opponent refused to make the CEO available for deposition under the "apex doctrine." Garrity explains the advice he gave, which was to immediately notice a designated-representative deposition under Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6). He also discusses the value of designated-representative depositions in arbitration, where - because of sharp restrictions on the number of depositions that can be taken - many witnesses will similarly be off-limits.

32,090 Listeners

30,660 Listeners

43,567 Listeners

16,372 Listeners

461 Listeners

26,387 Listeners

9,483 Listeners

56,388 Listeners

186 Listeners

5,749 Listeners

16,072 Listeners

48 Listeners

737 Listeners

10,791 Listeners

8,367 Listeners