By David G Bonagura, Jr.

But first a note from Dr. Royal:

David Bonagura rightly reminds us all today that the Eucharist is a mode of giving thanks - to God in the first place, but also for all the things in our lives, even the ones we find challenging, which often lead to still other good things. Americans celebrate Thanksgiving tomorrow and we won't be fundraising out of respect for the holiday. Sufficient to today, however, is the need to make sure that this Catholic Thing is here next year, as it has been for over 15 years. So our deep thanks to all of you who have contributed over the past week. And to our other readers: please, don't wait. Support TCT. Now's the time! And Happy Thanksgiving!

Now for Dr. Bonagura's column...

What motivates someone to attend Mass daily on his lunch break? To stop his car so he can make a visit to our Lord in the tabernacle? To confess his sins on a regular basis?

Such a person knows that Christ is truly present in the Eucharist, that being with Him and receiving Him as often as possible is a tremendous blessing. (This week especially it's good to remember that in Greek eucharistein means "to give thanks," which means every time the Eucharist is celebrated is a kind of Thanksgiving Day.) All this allows him to love and to serve Christ more effectively. Otherwise, he would not make these efforts.

Is knowledge of these essentials of faith alone sufficient to move him to do these things? If I think back to my high school years, I certainly learned the Church's teaching about Christ's Real Presence in the Eucharist. Yet I never attended Mass on weekdays, even though I knew it was offered daily. I knew - I just didn't care.

Mindful of my own history in light of the ongoing Eucharistic revival, I recently put the test to my sixteen- and thirteen-year-old sons, the least pious of my children. "Define the Eucharist." They did so correctly. "Then how come you are not eager to go to Mass more regularly or to the holy hour on Fridays?" Awkward silence - as if they knew they were in trouble.

Our bishops have been working hard at bringing about a Eucharistic revival, which is the greatest collective spiritual effort that the American Church has initiated in my lifetime. Preaching and catechizing are essential components of this labor: a person cannot love what he does not know.

Yet knowledge alone does not move the soul to love. It is necessary, but not sufficient. Something more is required.

What is that something? A personal relationship with Christ, which exists in varying degrees when a person believes deeply in the Lord and loves Him as he loves his family and friends. To live, to foster, and to enjoy this relationship - this friendship - the person makes the effort to visit the Lord and receive Him as often as possible, as he would make the effort to spend time with other loved ones.

Hence, we have another lens for viewing the Catholic understanding of the real presence: our approach to the Eucharist is indicative of the liveliness of our faith, that is, of our love of Christ. A successful Eucharistic revival, then, requires successful evangelization in equal measure. The goal of evangelization is to lead someone into friendship with Christ.

Of course, there is an element of the "chicken or egg question" in play. Preaching about the Eucharist is certainly not in competition with preaching about Christ more generally. Nor is there necessarily a chronological priority of one over the other. The Eucharist can be the greatest of evangelizers, since it is Christ Himself leading the charge.

Yet it does often seem that teaching the Eucharist is only as effective as one's pre-existent relationship to Christ. A powerful case in point: In October, I took twelve high school students to St. Patrick's Cathedral in New York City, where, under the auspices of the Napa Institute, 4,000 people participated in Mass and a Eucharistic procession through the heart of Manhattan. Father Mike Schmitz offered the Mass ...