Dan and James discuss a recent paper on intranasal oxytocin and spirituality
Some of the topics discussed:
A summary of a recent paper on oxytocin and spirituality Why within-subject designs are a better choice for oxytocin researchThe physiology of nasal administration How do you control for differences in nasal environmentHypothesis-driven vs. exploratory researchOxytocin pathway geneANCOVA and Lord's paradox (yep, it's called that)
Dan applauding the authors for posting ALL their data online James disagrees with Dan on approaches to pre-registering studiesJames promises never to chew during a recording (sorry!)Producing research vs. actually reading other people's researchOur first citation (sort of)How the replication crisis is the fact that we're not doing anyHeart rate variability in oysters (and other animals)The paper http://scan.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/06/22/scan.nsw078
Dan's blog post on intranasal oxytocin administration considerationshttps://medium.com/@dsquintana/intranasal-drug-administration-in-psychiatry-80d076f1abdd#.dsdrrohdu
Dan's paper on the promise and pitfalls of intranasal administration http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26552590
The data from the paperOur first (blog post) citationhttps://rhythmicpsychology.wordpress.com/2016/06/22/shock-shock-horror-horror/
Can we replicate the replication crisis?https://theconversation.com/is-psychology-really-in-crisis-60869
https://www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/
https://www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast
Support Everything Hertz