Everything Hertz

By Dan QuintanaScience Social Sciences Medicine Health & Fitness

Everything Hertz episodes

September 07, 2020115: A modest proposal
We discuss James' recent proposal that scientists should be paid for performing peer review for journals published by for-profit companies—$450, to be precise. Dan also puts forward three meta-science projects that he thinks are worth funding.
More details
James' tweet proposing peer review should be compensated
Since recording this episode, James has set up the @450Movement twitter account
Also see James' blog post
The Collabra Psychology journal
Did the folks that co-authored the "redefine statistical sigificance" paper actually go on to follow their own recommendations?
Would high financial compensation of people on job search panels lead to better quality hires?
A tool that would automatically scrape the email addresses the of authors of papers you cite would make life easier for asking for feedback and providing review recommendations.
I'm curious as to whether people are reading the show notes. If you are reading this and want a Hertz mug, the first person to send @hertzpodcast a tweet saying they read the show notes will get a free mug
Kristoffer Magnusson's statstics art
Join the Git Gud Science Discord by following this link: https://discord.gg/s8MN3gA
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
- Save 16% on either tier if you pay annually!
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, September 7) "115: A modest proposal", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4ZQ2E
Support Everything Hertz
1 hr 1 min
August 17, 2020114: Diversity in science (with Jess Wade)
We chat with Jess Wade (Imperial College London) about diversity issues in science, including her work increasing the profile of underrepresented scientists on Wikipedia and on getting more young women into science.
Here's what we cover:
Jess' Wikipedia page
Inferior, by Angela Saini
What's involved when making a bio page?
The "notability" criteria for adding a scientist's bio on wikipedia
Listen to Wikipedia grow on Hatnote
Don't write your own page, even under a psuedonym.
What's the best way to get girls into science and engineering?
The lack of diversity in science award winners
Follow Jess on Twitter!
The opportunuties provided by social media
Using social media to scope out new labs
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month: 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, a monthly newsletter, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
- $5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, August 16) "114: Diversity in Science (with Jess Wade)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/A6VMU
Special Guest: Jess Wade.
Support Everything Hertz
54 min
August 03, 2020113: Citation needed
Dan and James discuss whether scientists should spend more time creating and editing Wikipedia articles. They also chat about how they read scientific articles and the heuristics they use to help decide whether a paper's worth their time.
Here are some more details and links:
Send in your audio questions here
How does James read so much and what tips do Dan and James have for reading papers?
The Stork paper recommendation service
How James and Dan rapidly judge whether a paper is worth the time to read
The benefit of a memorable paper title
Peer review forces you to read papers carefully
James screens a few papers for further reading on the spot based on their titles
What is the role of Wikipedia in science communication and education?
Jess Wade's project advocating for better representation of female scientists on Wikipedia
Wikipedia articles vs. textbooks
Do we even need textbooks in psychology?
The Biological Psychology wiki textbook is a ghost town
Using the R bookdown package for online books
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, August 3) "113: Citation needed", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/3D6YJ
Support Everything Hertz
54 min
July 27, 2020112: Leaving academia
Dan and James chat about James' new industry job, why he quit academia, the biggest differences between academia and industry, and why it's crucial for early career researchers to have a plan B.
James new industry job
James' medium blog post
Having a plan B (and plan C) in academia
Using consulting a bridge to a full-time industry job
How to get an industry job
The role of grant success in academia
More research is now open access than not
Get 20% off our merch by using the promo code "AUGUST"
It's now easier to not be employed in academia but still contribute to academia
The NBA bubble
The Oura ring
Differences in work/life balance between academia and industry
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Cite this episode
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, July 27) "112: Leaving academia", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/DAZ7S
Support Everything Hertz
52 min
July 06, 2020111: The cumulative advantage of academic capital (with Chris Jackson)
We chat with Chris Jackson (Imperial College, London) about the "Matthew Effect" in academia, how we can improve work/balance, and whether we should stop citing shitty people.
Here's more stuff we cover:
Chris climbed the world's most dangerous volcano for a BBC show
Chris' email signature
Having a code of conduct for your lab
Work/life balance in academia
Are things worse in academia compared to other desk jobs?
How Chris co-founded "EarthArxiv", a preprint server for the earth sciences
The point/counterpoint article format (here is an example)
Open science in the geosciences
Requesting data from authors
Follow Chris on Twitter
Issues with bibliometrics
Should we stop citing shitty people?
The long wait to get your work expenses reiumbursed
Other links
Dan on twitter
James on [twitter]((https://twitter.com/jamesheathers)
Everything Hertz on twitter
Everything Hertz on [Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Cite this episode
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, July 6) "111: The cumulative advantage of academic capital (with Chris Jackson)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/KJ76G
Special Guest: Chris Jackson.
Sponsored By:
Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe.
Everything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz
Promo Code: everythinghertz
Support Everything Hertz
1 hr 1 min
June 15, 2020110: Red flags for errors in papers
We answer a listener question on identifying red flags for errors in papers. Is there a way to better equip peer-reviewers for spotting errors and suspicious data?
More details and links...
We answer an audio question from Kim Mitchell.
Submit your audio questions via our website
Nick Brown's blogpost on the video game "study"
We ran a live survey using Prolific! Go to prolific.com/everythinghertz to get $50 worth of credit for $1
Spotting unlikely data in meta-analysis
How can make reviewers better at detecting errors in papers?
Using a "Red team" to pull apart your papers
What do lay people think really happens in peer review?
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Buy our merch from our online store! We've got hats, mugs, hoodies, shirts + more
Cite this episode
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, June 15) "110: Red flags for errors in papers", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/VTYNG
Sponsored By:
Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe.
Everything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz
Promo Code: everythinghertz
Support Everything Hertz
47 min
June 01, 2020109: Open scientific publishing [Live episode]
Dan and James recorded a live episode on open publishing as part of the Open Publishing Fest. They also ran a survey (from start to finish) during the course of the episode on the public's perception of open scientific publishing and discuss the results.
Here are more stuff they covered, plus links!
The Open Publishing Fest
We collected data LIVE thanks to Prolific! Go to prolific.co/everythinghertz to get $50 worth of credit for just $1
How to build a low cost book scanner
A prepreprint repository for African researchers
What is the role of "niche" preprint servers vs. general preprint servers?
Is there a discoverability crisis?
Detailed literature search is HARD
The Octopus publishing platform
We discuss the results of our real-time survey on the public's perception of open publishing
Some university have set up a 'data office', to which data requests are sent to (instead of the author). Is this a good idea?
Are people really doing that many coronavirus studies?
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
We have a Merch store too, where you can pick up some Hertz gear.
Cite this episode
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, June 1) "109: Open scientific publishing [live episode]", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/AT2XH
Sponsored By:
Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe.
Everything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz
Promo Code: everythinghertz
Support Everything Hertz
52 min
May 18, 2020108: Requiem for a Screen
We discuss the recent claim that screen time is more harmful than heroin and whether psychological science is a crisis-ready discipline
Other stuff we cover:
Dan's adjustment to a second kid
The "Psychological science is not yet a crisis ready discipline" preprint
The Twitter thread from Rickard Carlsson
There is a contimuum of evidence for psychological science's use in a crisis
Belgian Officials: To Save Country's Potato Industry, Belgians Must Eat More Fries
Our episode with Amy Orben
Screen time has apparenty worse effects than heroin use on wellbeing
Are we better off without press releases?
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, May 18) "108: Requiem for a screen", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/BCKMS
Sponsored By:
Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe.
Everything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz
Promo Code: everythinghertz
Support Everything Hertz
48 min
May 04, 2020107: Memes, TikTok, and science communication (with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti)
We chat with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti (Chapman University, USA) about the role of memes and emerging social media in communicating science and statistics.
Stuff we cover + links:
Why Chelsea uses memes and social media for science communication
Chelsea's use of TikTok
Chelsea's TikTok profile
Chelsea's Instagram profile
How much time should you spend on science communication vs. science research?
What Twitch is and how this can be used by academics
Chelsea's Twitch profile
Dan's livestream of him writing a paper
Chelsea's profile on YouTube
Custom Stats themed Quiplash Game Codes: (JNL-HWDN) (DJM-ZDES)
Is Instagram worth it for Science communication?
NeuralNetMemes: https://instagram.com/neuralnetmemes/?hl=en
Have statistical software packages become too easy?
Chelsea's statisical consultancy service
brms package in R (bayesian regression): https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/brms/index.html
The JASP stats package
The Phantom Tollbooth book
The lady tasting tea book
Other links
Chelsea on twitter
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation and permanent link
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, May 4) "107: Memes, TikTok, and science communication (with Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], Retrieved from https://osf.io/8dywb/
Special Guest: Chelsea Parlett-Pelleriti.
Sponsored By:
Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe.
Everything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz
Promo Code: everythinghertz
Support Everything Hertz
1 hr 6 min
April 20, 2020106: Science on the run
Dan and James discuss whether getting rapid outcomes to address the pandemic is worth the increased risk of mistakes—how can researchers perform research that is both urgent and accurate?
Here's other stuff they discuss...
Whiskey as a hobby
James' pandemic tips
How publication practices have changed during the pandemic
The news article that stated bioRxiv papers are peer-reviewed
Peer review during a pandemic
The impact of the corona virus on employment in academia
Bad peer-reviewed studies do more damage than bad preprints
Preprints that require permission for citation
Is there a need for the rapid dissemination of psych research, at the risk of making errors?
Hertz merchandise
Other links
[Dan on twitter](www.twitter.com/dsquintana)
[James on twitter](www.twitter.com/jamesheathers)
[Everything Hertz on twitter](www.twitter.com/hertzpodcast)
[Everything Hertz on Facebook](www.facebook.com/everythinghertzpodcast/)
Music credits: [Lee Rosevere](freemusicarchive.org/music/Lee_Rosevere/)
Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff!
$1 a month or more: Monthly newsletter + Access to behind-the-scenes photos & video via the Patreon app + the the warm feeling you're supporting the show
$5 a month or more: All the stuff you get in the $1 tier PLUS a bonus mini episode every month (extras + the bits we couldn't include in our regular episodes)
Episode citation and permanent link
Quintana, D.S., Heathers, J.A.J. (Hosts). (2020, April 20) "106: Science on the Run)", Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], Retrieved from https://osf.io/7ydvz/
Sponsored By:
Prolific: Prolific helps researchers find research participants on demand, with a pool of 75,000 active participants in North America and Europe.
Everything Hertz listeners who want to give online sampling a go can get $50 in free Prolific credit that they can use to recruit participants, just go to prolific.co/everythinghertz
Promo Code: everythinghertz
Support Everything Hertz
51 min