
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
This week on Politix, Matt and Brian discuss:
* Donald Trump’s predictable, big (but not actually all that big) victory in Iowa
* Why leading Republicans (who know Trump is an electoral liability for the party) are trying to end the primary as quickly as possible, even with a semi-viable alternative who could make it a real race.
* Whether the media screwed up by calling the caucuses for Trump minutes after they opened, or whether it marks a return to the ratings and profit-driven mania of their 2016 Trump coverage.
Then, paid Politix subscribers get an in-depth look at a report by Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, which proves Trump accepted payments from foreign governments (including millions from China, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates) throughout his presidency. Matt and Brian debate:
* The political significance of Raskin’s findings.
* Why Democratic leaders seem uninterested in flogging or building on the report.
* What’s changed between 2006, when Democrats saw political value in exposing Republican corruption, and the Trump era, when they have more often than not downplayed it.
4
7878 ratings
This week on Politix, Matt and Brian discuss:
* Donald Trump’s predictable, big (but not actually all that big) victory in Iowa
* Why leading Republicans (who know Trump is an electoral liability for the party) are trying to end the primary as quickly as possible, even with a semi-viable alternative who could make it a real race.
* Whether the media screwed up by calling the caucuses for Trump minutes after they opened, or whether it marks a return to the ratings and profit-driven mania of their 2016 Trump coverage.
Then, paid Politix subscribers get an in-depth look at a report by Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, which proves Trump accepted payments from foreign governments (including millions from China, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates) throughout his presidency. Matt and Brian debate:
* The political significance of Raskin’s findings.
* Why Democratic leaders seem uninterested in flogging or building on the report.
* What’s changed between 2006, when Democrats saw political value in exposing Republican corruption, and the Trump era, when they have more often than not downplayed it.
8,485 Listeners
589 Listeners
2,425 Listeners
10,675 Listeners
2,280 Listeners
6,906 Listeners
94 Listeners
15,543 Listeners
2,437 Listeners
2,204 Listeners
429 Listeners
2,984 Listeners
145 Listeners
251 Listeners
207 Listeners