There are two opposing story lines circulating in news media about Australian real estate ownership.

One story line, repeated regularly by media, is that the Great Australian Dream is dead and that young Australian adults can no longer afford to buy homes.

The other one, revealed whenever the Australian Bureau of Statistics releases official data on real estate finance, tends to suggest that the dream is very much alive – and indeed thriving.

In fact, the latest lending figures show major increases in buying activity by all types of real estate consumers, including first-home buyers.

Media loves negative sensation about housing affordability and very often the truth is optional. 

Some organisations who crave publicity to lift the profile of their businesses regularly feed this weakness in news media by creating bogus reports about Australian housing affordability.

They do this, usually, by applying a set of parameters that are irrelevant and unrealistic.

Here’s a typical example: a so-called research organisation will create a report which examines how long it takes a young couple to save a 20% deposit to buy a house at the median price in Sydney or Melbourne.

Or how much a person needs to earn to achieve a loan for this.

Now, there are multiple reasons why this is a nonsense designed to create a headline rather than inform the public. These reports are full of furphies.

Furphy No.1 – you don’t need a 20% deposit. You can get into real estate ownership with a 10% deposit or even a 5% deposit.

Furphy No.2 – first-home buyers don’t buy at the median price in Sydney or Melbourne or anywhere else. They buy in the lower price ranges. The city median is irrelevant to the circumstances of young buyers and the issue of affordability.

Furphy No.3 – these reports always overlook attached dwellings as an option for buyers seeking affordability. In many capital city suburbs, the median price for units is half the median price for houses. But these bogus reports never speak about this viable, popular and more affordable option.

Why are these so-called research reports full of irrelevant and misleading information? Because the goal is NOT to inform people, or help people, or improve the situation for the community. The goal is always self-serving and dishonest – to create free publicity by generating alarm in the community.

And journalists are happy to recycle this nonsense as factual news.

In Sydney, the median house price is close to $1.5 million (according to CoreLogic) but that is irrelevant to people seeking affordability in our most expensive capital city. 

What is considerably MORE relevant is how much it costs to buy a unit in the Canterbury-Bankstown area of Sydney, where there are plenty of viable options in multiple suburbs in the price range from $400,000 to $600,000.

Or what it costs to buy a house in more affordable parts of Greater Sydney, like the local government areas of Liverpool, Parramatta and Blacktown.

And of course there is the reality that over 20 million Australians live in places other than Sydney and the median house price in our most expensive city is utterly irrelevant to them.

How about some focus on what it costs to buy a house in the affordable northern suburbs of Adelaide, or an apartment in the inner-city Brisbane suburb of Bowen Hills, or in the inner-city Perth suburb of Belmont or a house in outer-ring areas of Greater Melbourne.

And what about regional Australia, which is attracting growing numbers of new residents relocating from the biggest cities in search of a different lifestyle, empowered by technology that allows more and more people to work remotely.

So, let me tell you, the home ownership dream is very much alive right across Australia.

How can I be so sure? Because the official lending data confirms it.

The latest stats from the ABS – which is for the month of June - shows we are currently seeing growing numbers of people buying homes as first-home buyers, other types of owner-occupier buyers and investors.

Lending for the purchase of homes rose 19% in June, compared to a year earlier.

In June lending to owner-occupier buyers was up 13% compared to a year earlier, with an even larger increase in loans to investors. There was also a rise in lending to first-home buyers, though not as large an increase.

It should be fairly self-evident that lending levels would not be rising, including for first-home buyers, if it was true that no one can afford to buy any more.

We have highly active property markets in most parts of Australia and buyers of all kinds are active.

So, next time you see one of those shallow media headlines declaring that the dream is dead and that young Australians are priced out of the market, don’t believe it.