Share Hotspotting
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
By Terry Ryder & Tim Graham
The podcast currently has 794 episodes available.
It’s been 15 months since Prime Minister Anthony Albanese made his big announcement about fixing the housing shortage – but there has been, as yet, no progress in lifting rental vacancies and suppressing rental growth.
The press conference making the announcement that the Federal Government would build 1.2 million new homes in five years was held in August 2023 – but more than a year later it’s clear that little progress has been made and that rental vacancies are not improving.
The latest figures on vacancy rates from SQM Research shows the national vacancy rate at 1.2% In October, unchanged from September and only a fraction higher than a year ago.
Five of the eight state and territory capital cities actually recorded a month-on-month reduction in their vacancy rates, while two others recorded no change.
The only capital city to have an increase in vacancies was Darwin.
Overall, the number of properties available for rental has dropped from almost 38,000 in September to 36,500 in October.
To put that in context, in December 2016 – the last time Australia had a vacancy rate close to 3% - there were 90,000 homes available for rent across the nation.
And Australia has added about three million people to its population since 2016.
Compared with a year ago, when the Federal Government was spruiking its big fix to the shortage of homes, five of the eight capital cities still have vacancy rates at similar or the same levels – and one, Hobart, is significantly lower than 12 months ago.
The highest vacancy rate among the eight capital cities is Canberra at 1.7% - the same as it was a year ago and significantly lower than the benchmark 3% which is considered in the industry to represent a balanced rental market with stable rents.
Now, a year is a long enough time for a government to move the dial on an issue like the rental shortage. Australia could improve this situation almost overnight by implementing measures to encourage and incentivise Australians to become landlords.
The big problem, which has been building now for many years, is that the nation has a chronic shortage of people willing to take on the task of being landlords – buying an investment property and making it available for others to live in.
Government doesn’t perform this role and neither does big business. Over 90% of the homes that people rent in Australia are provided by mum-and-dad investors – but fewer and fewer people are willing to do it, at a time when the costs of doing so are unattractively high and the rules and regulations keep changing to the distinct disadvantage of the owners.
Governments caused this rental shortage and they keep making it worse. So rental vacancies are unlikely to improve in the foreseeable future.
And while that remains the case, there will continue to be upward pressure on rents and an absence of choice for people who need to rent or choose to rent.
Four years ago, the median weekly rent for a house in Australia was around $440 – today it’s over $700.
There are multiple reasons why Australia has a housing shortage and why the numbers of new dwellings needed are simply not being built.
This is something I have spoken about regularly in the past and will continue to do so, as it’s the core issue creating problems for real estate consumers of all kinds – home buyers, investor buyers and tenants.
Here are the latest events and announcements which help to explain why we have a housing shortage with rising prices and rising rents, problems which are not going to be fixed in the foreseeable future …
ITEM 1 – BUREAUCATIC DELAYS: Sydney councils are sitting on backlog of almost 8,500 unresolved development applications and requests for development certificates, according to NSW government data.
There are over 5,000 unresolved development applications across the Greater Sydney area, plus 3,300 active “complying development certificates”.
Five councils each have more than 300 local development applications that are waiting to be finalised. Data from the Department of Planning Housing and Infrastructure lists the Inner West Council as the worst offender, with 456 “active” DAs waiting for a determination.
The Northern Beaches, Hills Shire and Cumberland Councils also have major backlogs.
Thousands more “complying development certificates” are also adding to the backlog, despite being designed to give faster approvals to developments that meet certain requirements.
Some councils are taking more than a year to approve homes. And some developers are waiting up to a decade for projects to be approved.
In my view, one of the core issues is that many councils have a NIMBY attitude to development, especially high-density residential. They simply don’t want developments to be built and do everything they can to frustrate builders.
ITEM 2 – NOT FINANCIALLY VIABLE: In Perth, the rate of apartment completions has dropped to its lowest levels since records began in the 1980s.
A new Property Council report says that, to meet the housing targets set by the National Housing Accord, WA would need to be delivering five times the number of apartments per year that it currently is.
The Sky High report says there are more than 10,000 apartments approved for WA but effectively on hold and unable to be constructed.
The major issue is that projects are just not financially viable – because the cost of delivering an apartment is generally higher than the market is willing to pay, so projects simply don’t stack up. Only luxury apartments are economically viable projects.
The report blames climbing construction costs - driven by labour shortages and competition for labour from government and mining sectors.
The report says: “Developers are reporting that construction cost estimates are now almost double the cost of similar developments five years ago.”
The Property Council expects that costs will climb even higher as the new national construction code and bargaining agreements imposed by government take effect.
This is problem not only in Perth but right across Australia. Developers are scrapping unit projects because the costs are so high, making them financially unviable.
The Australian Construction Industry Forum says it’s a worrying trend for a country that needs more, denser homes – not only apartment towers but medium-rise and townhouse developments in existing suburbs – to tackle the chronic undersupply of housing and to ensure longer-term affordability.
The forum’s Construction Forecasting Council chair and chief economist Nerida Conisbee says: “It’s very, very expensive to build apartments. Many projects aren’t going ahead.”
ITEM 3 – WORKER SHORTAGES: A recent report reveals that Australia needs 130,000 additional workers to combat labour shortages in the construction sector. This has prompted calls for rapid reforms from both federal and state governments to attract and retain skilled labour.
The report says the nation is on track, in 2024, for the worst year in new home builds in over a decade, with an 9 per cent decline in new building starts, totalling just 158,000 when it needs to be 240,000 per year to meet the Federal Government’s fanciful target of 1.2 million new homes in five years.
Construction starts for detached houses have dropped by 10 per cent, while higher-density projects have declined by 6 per cent. If this pace continues, Australia could see fewer than 800,000 new home starts over the five years, leading to a shortfall of over 400,000 homes compared to the National Housing Accord target.
The decline in apprenticeship numbers further compounds this crisis, with completions down 8 per cent and commencements down 12 per cent in the past year.
ITEM 4 – POLITICAL POLICIES: The Housing Industry Association says a home building recovery is possible because buyer demand is rising, but state government housing policies risk stalling the revival.
HIA Senior Economist, Matt King, says demand for new homes nationally is accelerating - largely due to high population growth, low unemployment, stable incomes and the absence of interest rate rises for the past year.
King says activity generally is picking up, but there are big differences across capital city and regional markets. Sydney remains an outlier and there is still no indication of a near-term rebound in residential building in the big city.
King says: “New home building in the Sydney basin remains exceptionally low, primarily due to high land prices and excessive housing taxes and infrastructure charges.”
Australia-wide, the HIA says the detached home building sector looks promising, but the unit sector remains constrained and is unlikely to experience recovery before mid-2025.
King says: “The sector continues to be dampened by skilled labour shortages, business credit constraints and the aftermath of significant building material cost escalation.
“The extent of the recovery in new home building will be determined by the ability of governments to ease the barriers to home building.
“Recent state government plans to increased surcharges on foreign investors and introduce taxes on short-term rental accommodation are unhelpful at a time when stability is needed to achieve the target of 1.2 million homes.”
King says the rate of home building is being slowed down by government failure to implement policies such as expedited land releases, concessions on property taxation, and accelerated development approval time frames.
ITEM 5 – HIGH LAND COSTS: The rapidly prising cost of home sites is one of the biggest barriers to easing the housing shortage.
New figures for South East Queensland indicate that the cost of residential home sites has jumped by as much as $120,000 in a year – up 21 per cent in one LGA where it now costs as much for a block of land as the median home did just two years ago.
This is the City of Brisbane LGA where land prices rose 8.7 per cent in the September quarter alone, pushing the median price of a block of land to $685,000 – which is $3,000 more than what an established home cost in this area in June 2022.
The second biggest annual surge in land prices occurred in the City of Ipswich where the median block rose 15 er cent or by $48,000 to hit $360,000, with the third fastest pace set by Moreton Bay, where prices rose by 10 percent to $415,000.
The cheapest blocks of land in South East Queensland are in Logan City in Brisbane’s south, where a third of SEQ land sales are now occurring – with the median price at $350,000 after a rise of almost 10 percent across the year.
The Gold Coast had the second highest SEQ land price at $619,000, after an 8 percent rise in the past year.
So, you can imagine what a new house on a block of land costs, when the land alone costs well over $600,000 – as it does in the City of Brisbane and on the Gold Coast.
Why does it cost so much? Primarily because of bureaucratic delays, governments taxes fees and charges, and high interest rates – all problems created by our elected representatives.
If I asked you to nominate the market which had recorded the best long-term capital growth in Australia, what would your answer be?
Sydney, the capital city with the nation’s highest property prices?
Perth, which has had a booming property market lately and has led the nation on price growth for past couple of years?
Brisbane, which always attracts strong demand from buyers of all sorts?
Or perhaps Regional Queensland, which benefits from internal migrants moving from others parts of Australia and from investors seeking affordability and strong yields?
The correct answer is none of the above.
The market jurisdiction which has led the nation on long-term capital growth is: Regional Tasmania.
This is the outcome of research conducted by the Property Investment Professionals of Australia (PIPA), which analysed Australian Bureau of Statistics’ data on established median dwelling values over 20 years - from June 2004 to June 2024.
The top location recorded growth of 233% while the worst grew 100% over the two-decade period.
In comparison, over the past 20 years, the stock market (S&P/ASX 200) increased by 120%, according to investing.com.
In general terms, the best capital growth has been smaller capital cities or more affordable regions.
The top result was “the Rest of Tasmania”, which means Tasmania outside of the capital city Hobart or Regional Tasmania - where its established median house price rose from $169,000 20 years ago to $449,000 in mid-2024.
The best capital city performers were also some of our nation’s most affordable throughout the period with Adelaide, Hobart, and Brisbane taking out the top three city rankings.
PIPA comments that property markets are not linear – rather, price growth occurs at varying points over time. Hobart, for example, has experienced a softening of prices over the past few years, but its house price have almost tripled since 2004 – up 193% in 20 years.
Adelaide and Brisbane have both had very strong markets in the past two years but both had long periods of flat-lining prices throughout the past two decades.
It reflects the reality that real estate consumers get the best results through long-term ownership and PIPA Chair Nicola McDougall says property owners should always adopt a long-term mindset.
But PIPA research indicates many investors don’t follow that philosophy.
PIPA’s 2024 Annual Investor Sentiment Survey found that 61% of investors who sold in the past year had a holding period of less than 10 years – and 17% of those investors who sold indicated they had owned the property for less than three years.
So the rankings from the PIPA research on capital growth over the past 20 years are:
1 Regional Tasmania
2 Adelaide
3 Hobart
4 Brisbane
5 Regional Victoria
6 Perth
Sydney ranked seventh and Melbourne 11th, once again disproving one of the real estate’s greatest myths, that you get the best capital growth in the biggest cities – and that prime out-performs affordable.
And the worst performers were Darwin and “the Rest of Northern Territory” – but even the remote markets of the NT achieved a doubling of property values over 20 years.
The Property Playbook is a dynamic real estate show that empowers investors and professionals with the insights and strategies needed to achieve strong returns in the Australian property market. Hosted by Tim Graham & Terry Ryder from Hotspotting.
In this episode, Tim is joined by Hotspotting Founder and Director Terry Ryder. As an experienced real estate expert, Terry Ryder shares insights on identifying prime real estate investment locations in Australia. He introduces the Price Predictor Index, a model that predicts short-term property growth based on sales volumes. Ryder emphasises the significance of monitoring buyer activity, infrastructure investment, and market size when identifying promising real estate markets.
https://tickernews.co/shows/the-property-playbook/
Welcome to a special episode of Hotspotting’s pre-recorded interview series, Interviews with the 1%, where we dive into the strategies and journeys of Australia’s top investors—the elite 0.87% who own five or more properties. Hosted by Tim Graham, this series brings you invaluable insights from seasoned investors who have achieved what many aspire to.
In today’s episode, we sit down with Lisa Chapman—a property entrepreneur, investor, and co-creator of the luxury retreat, Eden Yarra Valley. Lisa shares her journey from a high-powered corporate career to becoming a full-time property entrepreneur, carving a unique niche in the accommodation and real estate sectors.
What You'll Learn in This Episode:The Mindset of the Top 1%: Discover what separates successful investors from the rest, as Lisa reveals her strategies and lessons learned from owning multiple properties.
Lisa’s Property Journey: From buying her first house at 22 to establishing diverse real estate ventures across the Yarra Valley and the Mornington Peninsula.
Creating Eden Yarra Valley: Hear the inspiring story of transforming a run-down property into a high-end retreat that caters to milestone events, weddings, and corporate retreats.
Navigating Career Transitions: Insights into Lisa’s pivot from a high-stress corporate career in PR and real estate marketing to her fulfilling role as a property entrepreneur.
Tips for Aspiring Investors: Practical advice for those looking to build their property portfolio, including lessons from Lisa’s successes and challenges.
Lisa Chapman’s remarkable career spans television, marketing, public relations, and real estate. She managed national and global campaigns, including the iconic launch of Melbourne’s Eureka Tower and Skydeck. After decades of corporate success, Lisa made a bold shift during the COVID-19 pandemic to focus on her passion for real estate and the Experience Economy.
Today, Lisa is the proud co-creator of Eden Yarra Valley, a luxury retreat offering bespoke accommodation for up to 30 guests. From weddings to wellness retreats, Lisa’s innovative approach to property investment highlights the value of creating meaningful experiences for clients.
Key Takeaways from Lisa’s Story:The Power of Vision: Lisa’s ability to see potential in underutilized properties has been central to her success.
The Value of Experience: Transitioning from corporate PR to property entrepreneurship, Lisa leveraged her marketing expertise to create a standout brand.
Lessons from Investing: Lisa shares actionable advice for both new and seasoned investors, including how to identify opportunities and manage challenges.
“We are living in the Experience Economy. Today, people are looking to invest in meaningful moments, not just material assets.”
“Real estate is about creating value—whether it’s a luxury retreat or an investment property. The potential is there if you’re willing to look.”
Website: edenyarravalley.com.au
Email: [email protected]
Stay tuned for more episodes of Interviews with the 1%, where we uncover the stories behind Australia’s most successful property investors. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe on your favorite podcast platform!
Host: Terry Ryder, Founder of Hotspotting.com.au Guest: Steve Palise, Commercial Property Expert and Founder of Palise Property
In this insightful webinar, Terry Ryder sits down with Steve Palise to explore the exciting world of commercial real estate. With decades of combined experience, Terry and Steve unpack key trends, strategies, and opportunities in non-residential property investment. Whether you’re a seasoned investor or just starting to consider commercial property, this session is packed with actionable insights.
Topics Covered:💡 Thinking about investing in commercial property? This webinar will help you understand the landscape and take your first steps toward creating a diversified, high-performing portfolio.
🎧 Listen to the Podcast: Stay updated on all things real estate by subscribing to our podcast on your favorite platform.
🔗 Connect with Us:
You can also access Steve's Commercial Property Course by visiting: https://www.commercialpropertyinstitute.com.au/
Use the code word Hotspotting to receive a 100% discount!
There are many reasons Australia has a dwelling shortage and affordability problems – including the increased time it takes to build a new home.
In recent years, it typically took around nine months on average to build a house in Australia. Today it takes 13 months.
It’s worse for businesses which are constructing apartment complexes.
Recent analysis from Master Builders Australia has revealed that building times for detached homes and apartments have almost doubled – with a consequent impact on costs.
Master Builders says: “It shouldn’t take this long to build a home”.
These findings, obtained from recent analysis of Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) data, show that it took an average of 13 months to build a detached house in FY2024, marking a 40 per cent increase on the average compared to a decade ago.
Master Builders noted that construction times had lengthened even further for apartment buildings, with the average of 33 months from approval to completion in FY2024, representing an 80 per cent increase on the average of 18.5 months observed in FY2011.
That warrants repeating: it previously took a year and a half to get the average apartment building completed, but now it takes almost three years.
And that’s the national average situation: it’s considerably worse in some states.
You don’t need to be a financial genius to understand what that does to the costs of building new homes in Australia.
CEO of Master Builders Australia, Denita Wawn, says these extended construction time frames are hindering the industry’s ability to address housing demand and confront the housing crisis.
She says: “There are a range of contributing factors including labour shortages, declining productivity, union pattern agreements, supply chain disruptions, complex regulatory requirements, occupational certificate backlogs and critical infrastructure delays.”
Wawn points out that, with the advancements which have occurred in technology and construction methods in recent years, “we should be building homes faster, not slower”.
Master Builders called for action to be taken to address the bottlenecks and inefficiencies around construction processes.
They suggest streamlining government approval processes, encouraging adoption of digital solutions, introducing incentives to grow the workforce through domestic and international means, and strengthening the domestic supply chain.
Master Builders chief economist Shane Garrett says that the latest ABS data on home completions indicate the country is on track to fall well short of the National Housing Accord target of 1.2 million homes by 2029 – indeed, by “over 400,000 homes”.
It’s long been the case that the two most populous states, New South Wales and Victoria, have attracted the highest levels of property investment – just by sheer weight of numbers.
But Victoria has lost its spot among the big two of property investment and is now being overtaken by Queensland.
Meanwhile, Queensland now leads the nation is overall real estate transactions, including purchases by both home-buyers and investors.
This is despite Victoria having a population of 7 million, versus 5.5 million in Queensland.
It provides further evidence that investors are deserting Victoria because of the raft of anti-landlord measures from the State Government, with more still to come.
And that Queensland is where buyers are all kinds are heading.
Analysis of ABS figures shows that, a year ago, 26 per cent of investor loans were for Victoria properties and around 22 per cent for Queensland.
More recently, the balance has shifted with Victoria dropping to 23 per cent of investor loans and Queensland continuing to rise.
Money.com.au says investors are abandoning Victoria for several reasons, including Victoria’s additional taxes on investors, and are flocking to Queensland.
Home Loans expert Mansour Soltani says: “Queensland is emerging as the new promised land. It has everything property investors look for including a strong local economy, population growth, expanding regional markets and ongoing infrastructure projects.”
Queensland is leading the nation with a 36 per cent year-on-year increase in investor loans, compared with the national average of 21 per cent.
Regional markets such as Townsville, Bundaberg, Rockhampton and Gladstone are offering low entry costs and above-average rental yields.
Soltani also says: “Queensland is not only leading investor activity — owner-occupied loans in the state grew by 12 per cent year-on-year, while no other market grew by more than 6 per cent, and New South Wales saw no growth.”
Realestate.com.au reports that nearly $40 billion was spent on residential property in Queensland in the past quarter, with the state recording the highest number of home sales in the country in the last three months.
Brisbane’s median dwelling price has also extended its lead over Melbourne’s — climbing to $885,000 in October, while Melbourne sits at $780,000, according to CoreLogic.
New figures from digital settlements platform, PEXA, show over 48,000 home sales were finalised across Queensland in the September quarter, with home buyers spending $38 billion — 27 per cent more than the same period a year ago.
The postcodes with the highest number of home sales in the three months were found in Toowoomba, the Gold Coast and Mackay.
Homebuyers also moved to regional coastal areas such as Bargara near Bundaberg and Urangan in the Hervey Bay region, as well as new housing development areas in Logan City and Ipswich City on the fringes of Greater Brisbane.
Whenever I’m asked for my rules for successful investing, I usually begin my response with this: Rule One – stop reading newspapers.
Expressed in a more 21st Century context, stop treating media soundbites as research.
People who base their investment decisions on the white noise in news media are running the risk of making very bad moves in the market.
My observation of the content of news media coverage of residential real estate is that there is far more misinformation than real, accurate, reliable information.
In modern media it’s all about clickbait and I find repeatedly that the headline presented to induce you to CLICK is highly misleading – and sometimes an outright lie.
I could provide dozens of examples from this week alone, but here’s just one classic example.
The headline above an article published on the news.com.au network, the nation’s biggest news organisation, proclaimed: “Worst is over: where rents are plummeting”
This was followed by the following opening statement:
“The worst of the rental crisis appears over across much of Australia, with rents plummeting in these areas. But it’s not all good news.”
Now the headline in this case is more than a lazy piece of sensationalism – because, not only is it untrue to claim that “rents are plummeting” but the content of the article does not support the claim in the headline.
You may have observed that, in the surreal world of journalists, nothing falls or decreases or drops – it collapses, it nosedives, it falls off a cliff – and, yes, it plummets.
Even when the decline is a few percent, barely a blip, it will be declared to be plummeting.
So having made the statement that rents were plummeting and that the worst of the rental shortage crisis was over, the New Limited article utterly failed to deliver on this very big statement.
If it was true, it would be one of the stories of the year. But, of course, it wasn’t true.
According to the article, Queensland’s asking rents “have surged again, increasing across 252 Queensland suburbs by up to 15 per cent since June”.
I’ve checked my dictionary definition of “plummeting” and it certainly doesn’t apply to the Queensland situation.
Next, Victoria. According to this article, there are more than 200 suburbs where rents are now at least $100 a week more expensive for units than in 2021.
It said: “Well-connected areas like Ashburton, Parkville, Aspendale, Caulfield South, Glen Waverley and Carlton have posted some of the biggest rises in weekly unit rents across the past three years, all of them up more than 40 per cent, according to new PropTrack data.”
No sign of anything plummeting in Victoria – where, incidentally, many investors have sold up and got out of the state because of draconian anti-landlord measures by the state government. So we can expect rents to keep rising in Melbourne.
In Adelaide, rents have fallen a little in the latest quarter in 17% of suburbs examined by PropTrack, but there’s no sign of plummeting in the other 83% of suburbs.
Adelaide, in fact, has had extraordinary growth in rentals in the past year and, with the vacancy rate still hovering around 0.6%, there’s no real basis for declaring that “the worst is over”.
In Perth, the vacancy rate remains well under 1% and there is no real prospect of rent relief any time soon.
So, looking through the entire article, the only evidence presented to go even close to supporting the noise in the headline is in Sydney.
According to this shoddy piece of “journalism”, Sydney has entered a correction phase.
PropTrack attributes the market slowdown to more rental homes becoming available and tenant demand dropping as more renters moved to share houses or back in with their parents to save money. Migration has also waned in recent months.
PropTrack says: “Demand and supply are working together to see a stabilisation in rental market conditions.”
But no evidence was presented in the article to support the notion that Sydney rents are nosediving.
So, in summary, only in Sydney is there evidence that “the worst is over” and there is nothing at all in this work of fiction is justify the claim that rents are plummeting – anywhere.
So, what is a realistic overview of the situation with the rental shortage crisis.
Nationally, the vacancy rate continues around 1% or slightly above 1%, depending on whose figures you believe.
None of the eight capital cities has a vacancy rate anywhere near 3%, which is the benchmark for a stable rental market with steady rents.
There are no government measures in play which will move the dial on this in the foreseeable future – except decisions which are likely to make it worse, rather than better.
In some locations, however, I do expect rental increases to moderate, because a ceiling has been reached in terms of the market’s ability to pay.
Amid a cost-of-living crisis, tenants cannot keep paying higher and higher rents, regardless of how many people they jam into a three-bedroom house or small apartment.
But rents plummeting? We’re unlikely to see that anywhere, not while vacancies are as low as they are.
The podcast currently has 794 episodes available.
91 Listeners
22 Listeners
70 Listeners
31 Listeners
18 Listeners
54 Listeners
12 Listeners
33 Listeners
11 Listeners
12 Listeners
13 Listeners
13 Listeners
15 Listeners
5 Listeners
8 Listeners