Barry Morphew is facing new murder charges in 2025—nearly three years after his first case was dismissed. This time, prosecutors are armed with something they didn’t have before: Suzanne Morphew’s remains, discovered in a shallow grave, and forensic analysis showing BAM—a rare animal tranquilizer—was present in her bones. But does this forensic discovery change the game, or are prosecutors still standing on shaky ground?

In this episode, we’re joined by Defense Attorney and former prosecutor Eric Faddis to break down the anatomy of the new charges. How strong is the forensic evidence, really? And will a jury be willing to convict without a weapon, a confession, or a confirmed cause of death?

We dig into the differences between the original case and the 2025 re-indictment. What new strategies might the prosecution use this time around? And how might the defense punch holes in a narrative that’s still largely circumstantial?

Eric offers his legal take on how jurors typically react to technical forensic evidence—especially rare substances like BAM that carry emotional weight but can be attacked for lack of direct sourcing. We also explore the legal risk of retrying a case after the original prosecution team was disbarred for discovery violations. Can the new team escape the shadow of those failures, or will the defense use them to build a new layer of doubt?

If you want to understand the legal chess match behind the headlines, this episode is for you. High stakes, high scrutiny, and a justice system trying to clean up its own mess.

#BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #NewCharges #2025Trial #ColdCase #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #ForensicEvidence #JusticeForSuzanne #TrueCrimeLaw 

 

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872