
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, Sarah Burstein, Professor of Law at the University of Oklahoma College of Law, Sarah R. Wasserman Rajec, Professor of Law at William & Mary Law School, and Andres Sawicki, Professor of Law at the University of Miami School of Law, discuss their draft, open-access Patent Law casebook, which will be available for adopting for the Fall 2021 semester. You can read a chapter from the casebook here. Among other things, they explain the goals of the casebook, and why it is important to create and assign open-access casebooks. Burstein is on Twitter at @design_law, Rajec is at @SarahRajec, Sawicki is at @apublicgood, and the casebook is at @PatentLawBook.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In this episode, Mihailis Diamantis, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Iowa College of Law, discusses his article "The Corporate Insanity Defense," which will be published in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology. Diamantis observes that nothing about the insanity defense prevents its application to a corporation. He argues that in some circumstances, corporations fail to control their agents, despite making the best possible effort. In some circumstances, the corporation is arguably "insane" because it lacks the volition to make a wrongful act. Under those circumstances, it would be counterproductive to punish the corporation. Diamantis is on Twitter at @ProfDiamantis.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In this episode, Mason Marks, Assistant Professor at Gonzaga University School of Law and Edmond J. Safra/Petrie-Flom Center Joint Fellow-in-Residence at Harvard University, and Dustin Marlan, Assistant Professor at University of Massachusetts College of Law Dartmouth, discuss their work on the regulation and use of psychedelics. Marks's scholarship is available here, and Marlan's scholarship is available here. They begin by explaining what psychedelics are and their emerging medical uses. They reflect on the strict regulation of psychedelics, and how it limits research into medical uses, as well as infringing on civil liberties. Marks in Twitter at @MasonMarksMD and Marlan is at @DustinMarlan.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In this episode, Raquel Muñiz, Assistant Professor at Boston College Lynch School of Education and Human Development, Dwayne Kwaysee Wright, Visiting Assistant Professor of Higher Education Administration at the George Washington University, and Rafael Alvarado, a graduate student at Pennsylvania State University, discuss their article, "Joint Identities?: A Self-Case Study of the Professional Identity Development of J.D./Ph.D. Professionals in Education Law," which they co-authored with Vanessa Miller and J. Queen McGrew, and which will be published in the Journal of Law & Education. They begin by explaining the different experience of being a law student and a graduate student in education, and how it creates conflicts that can result in a divided professional identity. They discuss their self-study of that experience, and how it could help schools better integrate those disciplines.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In this episode, Jennifer Randolph Reise, Visiting Professor of Law at Mitchell Hamline School of Law, discusses her article "Moving Ahead: Finding Opportunities for Transactional Training in Remote Legal Education," which will be published in the William Mitchell Law Review. Reise explains how teaching transactional lawyering requires a different approach than teaching litigation. She reflects on how the pandemic and remote learning have created both challenges and opportunities for adopting new methods in legal pedagogy. And she describes some of her own approaches to teaching transactional lawyering remotely in a business associations class. Reise is on Twitter at @JenReise.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In this episode, Pierre Schlag, University Distinguished Professor & Byron R. White Professor of Law, discusses his article "The Law Review Article," which is published in the University of Colorado Law Review. Here is the abstract:
What is a law review article? Does America know? How might we help America in this regard? Here, we approach the first question on the bias: As we have found, a growing body of learning and empirical evidence shows that genres are not merely forms, but forms that anticipate their substance. In this Article then, we try to capture this action by undertaking the first and only comprehensive “performative study” of the genre of the law review article.Drawing upon methodological advances and new learning far beyond anything thought previously possible, we investigate “the law review article” qua genre. What is it? What does it do? What are its implications? How does it make you feel?By teasing out the infrastructural determinations section by section, we demonstrate rigorously that there is both far more (and far less) going on than meets the eye. In what is the first instance in the history of the United States (and perhaps the world) we describe in each section of the law review article (e.g., Part I, Part II) whatever that description is performing. This is what we mean by “performative study.”With this approach, the reader can experience first-hand what the law review article does to him or her IRL. In a more conventional vein, it is hoped that this Article will be useful to junior legal scholars, young scholars’ workshops, elite law school boot camps, faculty evaluation committees, associate deans for research, law review editors and law school deans everywhere.The article closes with a call for improvements to the law review genre, cooperative federalism, daylight savings time, and the nature of the universe generally. The article is addressed not merely to The Court, but to The President, to Congress, and, of course, to “We the People.” Perhaps more than anything, we call for further sustained study of “the law review effect.” A sequel, entitled “Dissertation Disease,” is currently contemplated in order to undertake a similar study of the University Press Monograph.Among other things, Schlag reflects on whether "The Law Review Article" is actually a law review article, or something else; how the form of legal scholarship determines the content of legal scholarship; and why legal scholarship is so banal.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In this episode, Alfred Steiner, a lawyer at Mauriel Kapouytian Woods and an artist, discusses the relationship between his legal and artistic practices, especially his work in conceptual art. Steiner begins by describing his background as an artist and how he became a lawyer. He reflects how his legal practice informs his artistic practice, and vice versa. And he describes some of his works of conceptual art that reflect on and illuminate legal doctrine and practice, including copyright and economics of the art market. Steiner is on Twitter at @alfredsteiner.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.
Cover image: Alfred Steiner, Your Non-creative Photograph (Brian L. Frye edition).
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In this episode, Cathay Smith, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Montana Blewett School of Law, discusses her new article Political Fair Use. Professor Smith identifies an emerging tendency among courts to give special weight to political expression in cases involving copyright infringement and fair use, and she argues that this kind of special treatment has led to important departures from traditional fair use analysis and Supreme Court guidance. The article is forthcoming in the William & Mary Law Review and is available on SSRN. Professor Smith is on Twitter at @CathaySmith.
This episode was hosted by Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Professor in the School of Law and Professor in the Dwight Look College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. Professor Vishnubhakat is on Twitter at @emptydoors.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In this episode, David A. Friedman, Professor of Law at Willamette University College of Law, discusses his article "Impostor Scams," which will be published in the Michigan Journal of Law Reform. Friedman begins by explaining what an impostor scam is and describing the long history of impostor scams. He observes that impostor scams are a huge problem, and are facilitated by new technology. He argues that the government can and should do more to fight impostor scams, especially by giving more of the responsibility to intermediaries best able to limit them. Friedman is on Twitter at @profdaf.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
In this episode, Sarah J. Schendel, Assistant Professor of Academic Support at Suffolk University Law School, discusses her article "What You Don't Know (Can Hurt You): Using Exam Wrappers to Foster Self-Assessment Skills in Law Students," which is published in the Pace Law Review. Schendel begins by explaining what self-assessment is, how it works, and why it is essential to learning. She discusses why traditional law school pedagogy doesn't always facilitate self-assessment. And she reflects on how law professors can incorporate self-assessment into their teaching. Schendel is on Twitter at @s_james_s.
This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
From the publisher's feed
Ipse Dixit is a podcast on legal scholarship. Each episode of Ipse Dixit features a different guest discussing their scholarship. The podcast also features several special series.
The hosts of Ipse Dixit are:
Comments and suggestions are always welcome at [email protected]. You can follow the Ipse Dixit on Twitter at @IpseDixitPod.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

9,194 Listeners

3,472 Listeners

379 Listeners

1,102 Listeners

6,276 Listeners

5,733 Listeners

15,564 Listeners

5,762 Listeners

3,927 Listeners

1,420 Listeners

3,534 Listeners

66 Listeners

390 Listeners

742 Listeners

2,259 Listeners