
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Remotely piloted aircraft, or drones, have been the centerpiece of America’s counterterrorism toolkit since the start of the Obama presidency, and the benefits have been clear. Their use has significantly weakened al Qaeda and the Taliban while keeping American troops out of harm’s way. But critics of drone strikes argue that the short-term gains do not outweigh the long-term consequences—among them, radicalization of a public outraged over civilian deaths. Is our drone program hurting, or helping, in the fight against terrorism?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
By Open to Debate4.6
21102,110 ratings
Remotely piloted aircraft, or drones, have been the centerpiece of America’s counterterrorism toolkit since the start of the Obama presidency, and the benefits have been clear. Their use has significantly weakened al Qaeda and the Taliban while keeping American troops out of harm’s way. But critics of drone strikes argue that the short-term gains do not outweigh the long-term consequences—among them, radicalization of a public outraged over civilian deaths. Is our drone program hurting, or helping, in the fight against terrorism?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

31,993 Listeners

38,498 Listeners

6,789 Listeners

30,734 Listeners

25,784 Listeners

8,765 Listeners

9,192 Listeners

3,983 Listeners

5,096 Listeners

776 Listeners

111,918 Listeners

7,222 Listeners

16,363 Listeners

15,794 Listeners

619 Listeners