
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Remotely piloted aircraft, or drones, have been the centerpiece of America’s counterterrorism toolkit since the start of the Obama presidency, and the benefits have been clear. Their use has significantly weakened al Qaeda and the Taliban while keeping American troops out of harm’s way. But critics of drone strikes argue that the short-term gains do not outweigh the long-term consequences—among them, radicalization of a public outraged over civilian deaths. Is our drone program hurting, or helping, in the fight against terrorism?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
By Open to Debate4.6
21142,114 ratings
Remotely piloted aircraft, or drones, have been the centerpiece of America’s counterterrorism toolkit since the start of the Obama presidency, and the benefits have been clear. Their use has significantly weakened al Qaeda and the Taliban while keeping American troops out of harm’s way. But critics of drone strikes argue that the short-term gains do not outweigh the long-term consequences—among them, radicalization of a public outraged over civilian deaths. Is our drone program hurting, or helping, in the fight against terrorism?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

32,246 Listeners

30,609 Listeners

43,687 Listeners

5,130 Listeners

10,747 Listeners

781 Listeners

26,380 Listeners

4,270 Listeners

2,461 Listeners

1,110 Listeners

2,380 Listeners

7,244 Listeners

16,512 Listeners

32 Listeners

16,525 Listeners