
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Remotely piloted aircraft, or drones, have been the centerpiece of America’s counterterrorism toolkit since the start of the Obama presidency, and the benefits have been clear. Their use has significantly weakened al Qaeda and the Taliban while keeping American troops out of harm’s way. But critics of drone strikes argue that the short-term gains do not outweigh the long-term consequences—among them, radicalization of a public outraged over civilian deaths. Is our drone program hurting, or helping, in the fight against terrorism?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
By Open to Debate4.6
21142,114 ratings
Remotely piloted aircraft, or drones, have been the centerpiece of America’s counterterrorism toolkit since the start of the Obama presidency, and the benefits have been clear. Their use has significantly weakened al Qaeda and the Taliban while keeping American troops out of harm’s way. But critics of drone strikes argue that the short-term gains do not outweigh the long-term consequences—among them, radicalization of a public outraged over civilian deaths. Is our drone program hurting, or helping, in the fight against terrorism?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

32,263 Listeners

30,678 Listeners

43,532 Listeners

5,132 Listeners

10,695 Listeners

778 Listeners

26,397 Listeners

4,294 Listeners

2,468 Listeners

1,113 Listeners

2,370 Listeners

7,292 Listeners

16,489 Listeners

35 Listeners

16,366 Listeners