
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Remotely piloted aircraft, or drones, have been the centerpiece of America’s counterterrorism toolkit since the start of the Obama presidency, and the benefits have been clear. Their use has significantly weakened al Qaeda and the Taliban while keeping American troops out of harm’s way. But critics of drone strikes argue that the short-term gains do not outweigh the long-term consequences—among them, radicalization of a public outraged over civilian deaths. Is our drone program hurting, or helping, in the fight against terrorism?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
By Open to Debate4.6
21142,114 ratings
Remotely piloted aircraft, or drones, have been the centerpiece of America’s counterterrorism toolkit since the start of the Obama presidency, and the benefits have been clear. Their use has significantly weakened al Qaeda and the Taliban while keeping American troops out of harm’s way. But critics of drone strikes argue that the short-term gains do not outweigh the long-term consequences—among them, radicalization of a public outraged over civilian deaths. Is our drone program hurting, or helping, in the fight against terrorism?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

32,055 Listeners

30,726 Listeners

43,638 Listeners

5,110 Listeners

10,740 Listeners

771 Listeners

26,278 Listeners

4,279 Listeners

2,448 Listeners

1,106 Listeners

2,357 Listeners

7,248 Listeners

16,393 Listeners

32 Listeners

16,340 Listeners