
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Remotely piloted aircraft, or drones, have been the centerpiece of America’s counterterrorism toolkit since the start of the Obama presidency, and the benefits have been clear. Their use has significantly weakened al Qaeda and the Taliban while keeping American troops out of harm’s way. But critics of drone strikes argue that the short-term gains do not outweigh the long-term consequences—among them, radicalization of a public outraged over civilian deaths. Is our drone program hurting, or helping, in the fight against terrorism?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
By Open to Debate4.6
21062,106 ratings
Remotely piloted aircraft, or drones, have been the centerpiece of America’s counterterrorism toolkit since the start of the Obama presidency, and the benefits have been clear. Their use has significantly weakened al Qaeda and the Taliban while keeping American troops out of harm’s way. But critics of drone strikes argue that the short-term gains do not outweigh the long-term consequences—among them, radicalization of a public outraged over civilian deaths. Is our drone program hurting, or helping, in the fight against terrorism?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

32,150 Listeners

30,650 Listeners

5,102 Listeners

784 Listeners

2,438 Listeners

1,511 Listeners

902 Listeners

795 Listeners

7,070 Listeners

728 Listeners

32 Listeners

546 Listeners

824 Listeners

16,096 Listeners

8,791 Listeners