
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s plan for winning the presidential election relies on putting together African-American voters of all ages, including younger Black people who are less enthusiastic about him, and white moderates who find President Trump unacceptable.
At last week’s Republican National Convention, the Trump campaign appeared to be sowing discord within that coalition. By framing the response to unrest in cities as binary — you are either for violence or for the police — Republicans seemed to be daring Mr. Biden to challenge young Black voters.
In a speech in Pittsburgh yesterday, Mr. Biden rejected that choice. Instead, he recognized the grievances of peaceful protesters, while denouncing “the senseless violence of looting and burning and destruction of property.”
Today, we examine whether the speech worked — and what it means for the rest of the election campaign.
Guest: Alexander Burns, a national political correspondent for The New York Times.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily
Background reading:
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
By The New York Times4.3
103657103,657 ratings
Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s plan for winning the presidential election relies on putting together African-American voters of all ages, including younger Black people who are less enthusiastic about him, and white moderates who find President Trump unacceptable.
At last week’s Republican National Convention, the Trump campaign appeared to be sowing discord within that coalition. By framing the response to unrest in cities as binary — you are either for violence or for the police — Republicans seemed to be daring Mr. Biden to challenge young Black voters.
In a speech in Pittsburgh yesterday, Mr. Biden rejected that choice. Instead, he recognized the grievances of peaceful protesters, while denouncing “the senseless violence of looting and burning and destruction of property.”
Today, we examine whether the speech worked — and what it means for the rest of the election campaign.
Guest: Alexander Burns, a national political correspondent for The New York Times.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily
Background reading:
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

91,044 Listeners

8,915 Listeners

38,605 Listeners

6,798 Listeners

25,911 Listeners

3,956 Listeners

1,509 Listeners

2,069 Listeners

143 Listeners

87,995 Listeners

56,921 Listeners

10,322 Listeners

1,521 Listeners

12,630 Listeners

310 Listeners

7,265 Listeners

5,480 Listeners

466 Listeners

51 Listeners

2,348 Listeners

380 Listeners

6,464 Listeners

6,684 Listeners

5,542 Listeners

16,409 Listeners

1,501 Listeners

10,990 Listeners

1,617 Listeners

681 Listeners

13 Listeners

631 Listeners

27 Listeners

0 Listeners