
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Anthropic calls some AI distillation illicit. But is distillation illegal?
The answer may depend less on what you do with AI outputs than on how you accessed them.
This episode is a deep dive into how courts might rule. We cover X v. Bright Data, what OpenAI's and Anthropic's terms say about who owns AI outputs, why Anthropic's own fair use arguments could be turned against it and what the labs will likely do next.
Thank you to the presenting sponsor of this episode, Altitude. Visit altitude.xyz/law to learn more about their payments platform.
You'll hear from the three Variant co-authors of one of the sharpest papers on the topic:
Read their article here: https://variant.fund/articles/license-distill-law-distillation-anthropic/.
Timestamps:
0:00 What is distillation?
1:52 Intro
3:01 Why distillation matters
5:44 X v. Bright Data
7:50 Access vs. selling
10:40 Copyright preemption
11:25 Why X doesn't own your posts
13:49 From scraping to distillation
16:12 Who owns AI outputs?
19:38 Is all distillation illicit?
24:10 Anthropic's fair use problem
25:05 Bartz v. Anthropic
26:42 Predictions
28:41 Distilling the distillers
29:21 Selling services, not tokens
32:34 Antitrust
37:06 Tech moves exponentially, law sublinearly
40:47 Humans, AI and personhood
45:15 Final thoughts
Thank you as well to the other sponsors of this episode: Cahill Gordon & Reindel, the Solana Policy Institute, the Hyperliquid Policy Center and the Decentralization Research Center.
To get in touch with the Cahill team about how any issues discussed in this episode apply to your situation, email [email protected].
Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or investment advice. Views expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of their employers. Listening to this podcast does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Cybercrime costs Americans an estimated $200 billion a year, and AI is supercharging it. The U.S. government's newest response is one of the oldest tools in the Constitution, one Congress hasn't used since the War of 1812.
This episode covers letters of marque and privateers: their role in the American Revolution, how prize courts and bonds kept privateers from becoming pirates, and the White House memo that trends toward implementing a modern version for cyberspace.
Sponsors:
This episode is presented by Altitude, visit altitude.xyz/law to learn more about their global payments platform.
Sponsors also include: The law firm Cahill Gordon & Reindel. Cahill is hosting Confluence 2026, its flagship emerging tech conference, in New York City on September 24, 2026. You can apply to attend here: https://www.cahill.com/confluence2026.
Thank you as well to the Solana Policy Institute and the Hyperliquid Policy Center for supporting the podcast.
Guests:
Timestamps:
(0:00) The $200 billion problem
(2:16) The Model T and the FBI
(4:18) Pig butchering
(7:03) History
(7:50) The high seas and the internet
(8:30) Marque vs. reprisal
(11:35) American Revolution
(14:08) Building a (private) navy
(17:25) The Constitution
(18:40) The Paris Declaration
(20:34) Pirates or privateers?
(22:12) The five-part system
(22:40) Why government can't scale
(23:30) The Fourth Amendment
(25:26) Suspicious Activity Reports
(28:23) Recent memorandum
(30:40) The bond
(32:34) The blockchain
(33:49) Latest from U.S. gov't
(34:56) The attribution problem
(36:30) Who's involved today?
(37:49) The Beacon Network
(39:16) Pre-clearance and due process
(41:10) Reporting cybercrime
(44:26) International law
This should be the internet's best explainer on letters of marque. You don't need to be a lawyer, historian or security expert to follow along.
Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or investment advice. Views expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of their employers. Listening to this podcast does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Vaults might be finance's next trillion-dollar opportunity. But what are they? How do they work? What regulation might apply?
You'll hear from the creator of crypto vaults, Andre Cronje (Flying Tulip, Yearn), alongside builders Adrian Cachinero Vasiljevic (Steakhouse Financial) and Charles St. Louis (Ethereum Foundation).
You'll also hear from SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce and top lawyers Lewis Cohen (Cahill), Tuongvy Le (Veda Labs), Rodrigo Seira (Cooley) and Linda Jeng (Aave).
Thank you to the presenting sponsor of this episode, Altitude (altitude.xyz/law), a payments platform for the next generation.
This should be the internet's best podcast on vaults. You don't need to be a lawyer, developer or finance expert to follow along.
Timestamps:
(0:00) Intro
(4:27) What is a vault?
(9:34) History of onchain vaults
(11:55) The first vault, with Andre Cronje
(21:05) The SEC's early interest
(22:30) Investment contracts and Howey
(31:28) Notes and Reves
(37:10) The strategist
(48:54) The curator
(58:30) Investment company?
(1:12:40) Investment adviser?
(1:20:00) Separately managed accounts
(1:30:30) Custody rules
(1:55:43) What's next
Thank you as well to the law firm Cahill Gordon & Reindel for sponsoring this podcast. If you'd like to join Cahill's flagship emerging tech conference, Confluence, you can apply here: https://www.cahill.com/confluence2026.
Thank you as well to the Solana Policy Institute and the Hyperliquid Policy Center for supporting the podcast.
Nothing in this podcast is legal or investment advice.
Commissioner Hester Peirce joins the podcast to discuss Regulation Crypto Assets, as well as secondary market trading, DePIN and vaults.
If you haven't listened to the full Reg Crypto explainer, that's episode 208.
This episode is presented by Altitude. Visit altitude.xyz/law to learn more about their financial operating system.
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
2:22 Secondary transactions
3:23 Promises and representations
5:05 Essential managerial efforts
8:27 Regulatory arbitrage
10:29 Form TR
16:59 Existing token projects and Form TR
18:27 Compliance costs
21:48 Secondary markets
24:12 DePIN
27:02 Vaults
35:31 Accredited investors
40:25 Tokens and equity
Thank you to the other sponsors of this episode: Cahill Gordon & Reindel, the Solana Policy Institute and the Hyperliquid Policy Center.
On Thursday, September 24, 2026, CahillNXT will host Confluence 2026, its flagship conference, in New York City.
This year's theme, Leading the NXT Frontier, brings together regulators, institutional investors, founders, policymakers and industry leaders to examine digital assets, market structure, regulation and the emerging technologies transforming financial markets.
To register your interest, email [email protected].
Newsletter: Stay updated on emerging tech law for free at lawofcode.fm.
Any feedback on this episode? Or how to improve the podcast? Click here: https://forms.gle/yFFN66e8iy8shQkAA
Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or investment advice. Commissioner Peirce's views are her own and do not necessarily represent those of the SEC or her fellow Commissioners. Listening to this podcast does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The GRANITE Act is a two-and-a-half-page bill designed to stop foreign governments from censoring Americans online.
Preston Byrne, the Managing Partner at Byrne & Storm, has spent over a decade advising tech companies on free speech questions. His work was instrumental in the introduction of the GRANITE Act in the U.S. House of Representatives on August 27, 2026.
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
2:10 How foreign governments censor Americans
3:34 The origins of sovereign immunity
6:40 197 demands, 4 refusals
8:58 Sovereign immunity in the courts
10:58 The GRANITE Act shield
12:37 The GRANITE Act sword
17:20 Where GRANITE stands in the states, House and Senate
This episode is presented by Altitude. Visit altitude.xyz/law to understand why.
Thank you to the other sponsors of this episode: Cahill Gordon & Reindel, the Solana Policy Institute and the Hyperliquid Policy Center.
Preston's Blog Post: https://prestonbyrne.com/2026/08/28/rulligranite/
GRANITE Act: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/10174/text?s=1&r=1&hl=granite
Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or investment advice. Views expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of their employers. Listening to this podcast does not create an attorney-client relationship.
What is Regulation Crypto Assets? An SEC-led rule proposal that allows projects to raise capital in the U.S. by selling tokens. That's the short answer.
The long answer is this podcast. By the end of this episode, you'll understand why these rules were needed, what they say and what could still be tweaked before they become law.
This episode is presented by Altitude, visit altitude.xyz/law to learn more about their financial operating system.
You'll hear from leading lawyers, almost all of whom are cited in the footnotes of the SEC's own proposal:
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
4:17 How we got here
6:53 Solving two problems
10:21 Reg A, Reg CF and Reg D
12:10 Five subparts of Reg Crypto
14:12 Who will use these?
18:08 The Startup Exemption
19:35 Rule 103 disclosures
21:03 LBRY and silence
30:14 Secondary markets and Telegram
34:13 The Fundraising Exemption
42:21 Why Reg A and Reg CF failed
48:14 Rule 400: Exit
50:23 Third-party problems
57:34 Under-promising
1:02:08 Essential managerial efforts
1:12:09 The state of crypto
1:15:13 State law questions
1:20:37 What's next?
Thank you to the sponsors of this episode: Cahill Gordon & Reindel, the Solana Policy Institute and the Hyperliquid Policy Center.
To get in touch with the Cahill team about how any issues discussed in this episode apply to your situation, email [email protected].
Newsletter: Stay updated on emerging tech law for free at lawofcode.fm.
Any feedback on this episode? Or how to improve the podcast? Click here: https://forms.gle/yFFN66e8iy8shQkAA.
Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or investment advice. Views expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of their employers. Listening to this podcast does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Grant Vingoe is the CEO of the Ontario Securities Commission, Canada's largest securities regulator.
Grant explains Canada's approach to crypto and why he sees a careful, incremental approach as a strength.
Law of Code is presented by Altitude, visit https://altitude.xyz/law to learn why.
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
0:55 From 30 years in New York to running the OSC
5:49 How the CSA and Canada's provincial regulators fit together
9:01 The crypto contract
12:34 Grant's first exposure to crypto
16:09 The gamification of financial markets and prediction markets
21:22 Making crypto safer for Canadians, from ETFs onward
26:30 Stablecoins
29:52 The Stablecoin Act and federal regulators
35:02 The $30,000 purchase limit
38:18 How industry can better engage regulators
45:02 Canada's brain drain question
50:34 Modernizing the regulation of public companies
54:17 Permissionless finance
1:01:13 Accredited investor rules
Thank you to our other sponsors:
McCarthy Tétrault LLP, with which I am co-hosting a Crypto in Canada event on August 12, 2026 in Toronto: https://luma.com/89qnrnah
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP: https://www.osler.com/en/expertise/services/digital-assets-and-blockchain/
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP: https://www.cahill.com/practices/litigation-digital-assets-and-emerging-technology
Solana Policy Institute: https://www.solanapolicyinstitute.org/
Hyperliquid Policy Center: https://hyperliquidpolicy.org/
Sign up for the free Law of Code newsletter at lawofcode.fm.
How does Canada regulate crypto? This podcast answers that in less than 60 minutes.
You'll hear from Grant Vingoe, CEO of the OSC, Eric Richmond, CEO of Coinbase Canada, the Bank of Canada's Anne Butler, McCarthy's Lori Stein, Osler's Matt Burgoyne, Evan Thomas, Dr. Ryan Clements of the ASC and Blair Wiley of Wealthsimple.
Law of Code is presented by Altitude, visit https://altitude.xyz/law to learn why.
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
2:42 Tax
4:53 AML Rules
8:06 Securities
12:00 Investment contracts
16:13 Quadriga's collapse
23:00 The Crypto Contract
34:29 World's first Bitcoin ETF
38:23 Stablecoins
46:47 Where Canada could play offense: DeFi, perps and tokenization
52:53 The speed problem
Nothing in this podcast is legal or investment advice.
Thank you to our other sponsors:
McCarthy Tétrault LLP, with which I am co-hosting a Crypto in Canada event on August 12, 2026 in Toronto: https://luma.com/89qnrnah
Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP: https://www.osler.com/en/expertise/services/digital-assets-and-blockchain/
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP: https://www.cahill.com/practices/litigation-digital-assets-and-emerging-technology
Solana Policy Institute: https://www.solanapolicyinstitute.org/
Hyperliquid Policy Center: https://hyperliquidpolicy.org/
Sign up for the free Law of Code newsletter at lawofcode.fm.
Kyle Poe is a former BigLaw partner and currently VP of Legal Innovation and Strategy at Legora, a legal AI startup valued at $5.6 billion.
Kyle explains why he sees a generational reordering happening in the legal profession, how firms are best institutionalizing partner knowledge as IP, and where the moat exists for lawyers as AI grows in ubiquity.
Law of Code is presented by Altitude, visit https://altitude.xyz/law to learn why.
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
0:56 The billable hour and the incentive problem inside firms
2:36 Institutionalizing partner knowledge as firm IP
4:02 Why partner buyouts are accelerating
5:56 Why AI is different from the internet and email
9:31 How top firms are operationalizing AI
12:35 Building innovation teams from the top down
14:37 More lawyers or fewer? The future of demand
19:20 Grinders, minders and finders
22:10 What lawyers should be asking about AI
25:13 Legora's moat
Thank you to our other sponsors:
Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP: https://www.cahill.com/practices/litigation-digital-assets-and-emerging-technology
Solana Policy Institute: https://www.solanapolicyinstitute.org/
Hyperliquid Policy Center: https://hyperliquidpolicy.org/
Sign up for the free Law of Code newsletter at lawofcode.fm.
By the end of this episode, you'll understand how lawyers are actually AI maxxing in 2026, and how you can, too.
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
1:58 Why it's the best time to be a lawyer
3:03 Hallucinations and cognitive surrender
5:33 Quality over efficiency
8:13 Why AI upends legal work
15:20 60% of contracts filed to EDGAR have mistakes
20:04 How LLMs actually work
25:59 Zero data retention, explained
29:16 The privacy risk beyond training
39:16 How to prompt
47:03 Michael Showalter's AI-native litigation stack
55:27 Spellbook's Compare to Market Feature
1:03:10 Building a regulatory agent
1:09:50 The judgment crisis for junior lawyers
1:12:15 Cooley's AI training method
You'll hear from 10 people at the cutting edge of legal AI:
This episode is presented by Altitude, visit altitude.xyz/law to learn more about their financial operating system.
Newsletter: Stay updated on emerging tech law for free at lawofcode.fm.
Any feedback on this episode? Or how to improve the podcast? Click here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1QAcE1sQAKZIkma20DbyB5frgKdiK8UB6Fkb6CwaVP1I/edit
Sponsors: Thank you to the Hyperliquid Policy Center and Solana Policy Institute for supporting this podcast.
To get in touch with the Cahill team about how any issues discussed in this episode apply to your situation, email [email protected].
Disclaimer: This podcast is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or investment advice. Views expressed by guests are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of their employers. Listening to this podcast does not create an attorney-client relationship.
From the publisher's feed

1,091 Listeners

1,202 Listeners

111,866 Listeners

735 Listeners

10,179 Listeners

15,908 Listeners

164 Listeners

26,551 Listeners

681 Listeners

9 Listeners

77 Listeners