In Episode 10 of NTSB News Talk, aviation safety experts Max Trescott and Rob Mark examine recent accident reports that reinforce why loss of control in flight continues to be the number one cause of fatalities in general aviation. Drawing from official NTSB accident reports and preliminary findings, they analyze crashes involving a TBM turboprop in Montana, a Beechcraft King Air in Arizona, and other cases where night flying illusions and equipment failures played a decisive role.

Rob begins with an August accident in Kalispell, Montana, where a TBM turboprop attempted to land at the city airport. Witnesses said the aircraft touched down near the approach end of the runway before veering into parked planes, sparking a fire. Incredibly, all four occupants survived with only minor injuries. Though details are still sparse, the incident highlights how quickly loss of control can occur even in a high-performance single-engine turboprop.

Max and Rob stress that while the TBM is an advanced and capable aircraft, any landing can go wrong if the pilot mismanages energy or fails to stabilize the approach. This accident serves as a reminder that precision, discipline, and preparation remain critical during the landing phase, when the margin for error is smallest.

The hosts then turn to a tragic August 5th accident involving a Beechcraft King Air 300 on the Navajo Nation in eastern Arizona. The aircraft was inbound on a medical transport flight, but before picking up its patient it crashed near the single runway at Chinle Municipal Airport. All four aboard—two pilots and two healthcare providers—were killed.

Conditions that day created a perfect storm: a density altitude of over 8,400 feet combined with gusty crosswinds approaching 28 knots, nearly 90 degrees to the runway. The demonstrated crosswind limit for the King Air 300 is 20 knots, but as Rob explains, that number is not a hard limitation—it simply reflects the strongest crosswind tested during certification. What really matters is pilot proficiency.

The Chinle crash underscores the dangers of trying to land in challenging conditions when performance margins are already compromised by high elevation and high temperature. For many pilots, especially those not flying crosswind landings regularly, the combination can quickly exceed skill level and lead to loss of control.

Rob next covers a preliminary report on a Cessna Conquest II that departed Youngstown, Ohio, en route to Bozeman, Montana. Security video showed the aircraft lifting off after a normal ground roll, but instead of climbing, it leveled off at just 100 feet and maintained that altitude until impacting trees. Both engines were reportedly running, making the lack of climb especially puzzling.

Witnesses described unusual engine sounds, but Max and Rob note that eyewitness accounts are often unreliable. The bigger mystery is why the pilot failed to climb, despite having ample power available. Possible scenarios include distraction, incapacitation, or improper handling of the aircraft. As Max points out, 80 percent of accidents are linked to human error, and this crash may ultimately fall into that category.

Max then shares insights into a Piper PA-28 crash in Needles, California, where two low-time pilots were building hours for airline transport certification. After a go-around at night, the aircraft crashed almost immediately. The conditions—dark desert terrain with no horizon—were ideal for somatogravic illusion, a common cause of accidents at night.

Somatogravic illusion occurs when acceleration tricks the body into feeling like it is pitching up, leading pilots to push forward on the controls when they should be climbing. With little visual reference and limited experience, the pilots in this case likely succumbed to the illusion. Max emphasizes that pilots flying in dark-night conditions must always cross-check instruments, especially the vertical speed indicator, to confirm a positive rate of climb.

The episode also examines two final NTSB reports. The first involved a Mooney that struck power lines near Gaithersburg, Maryland, while flying an approach in dark night IMC. Photos of the aircraft wedged into a transmission tower made national headlines. The investigation revealed the pilot was unfamiliar with his IFR-certified GPS and often relied on a handheld unit instead. Poor avionics knowledge combined with descent below minimums led to the crash.

The second report focused on a Hawaii medical transport King Air C90 that crashed into the ocean at night after its attitude indicator failed. Cockpit video captured the pilot listening to music and chatting with crew before the failure, and later struggling to control the aircraft without reliable instruments. The NTSB cited inadequate training and a history of poor checkride performance as contributing factors. The accident reinforced the critical need for proficiency in hand-flying and backup instrument skills.

Throughout the discussion, Max and Rob emphasize several recurring themes:

• Loss of control remains aviation’s deadliest risk. Even experienced pilots can miss upset cues or fall victim to illusions.
• Avionics knowledge is essential. Pilots must know their GPS and autopilot systems thoroughly to avoid confusion in high-stress situations.
• Simulator training pays off. Practicing hand-flying, instrument failures, and upset recovery in a safe environment builds resilience.
• Dark-night conditions are uniquely hazardous. Without lights or a horizon, illusions can overwhelm even competent pilots.
• Altitude and proficiency are survival tools. Whether flying a TBM, King Air, or a light single, the best defense is disciplined flying and constant preparation.

Episode 10 of NTSB News Talk demonstrates that while technology and aircraft performance continue to advance, pilot proficiency and decision-making remain the decisive factors in aviation safety. From Montana to Arizona, Ohio to Hawaii, the NTSB’s accident reports show that staying sharp, staying current, and understanding the human factors behind loss of control can save lives.

Please check out these other podcasts in the Aviation News Talk Network:

Aviation News Talk

Rotary Wing Show Podcast 

UAV News Talk Podcast 

On this episode of NTSB News Talk, Max Trescott covers the third and final day of the NTSB’s investigative hearing into the January 2024 midair collision near Washington’s Reagan National Airport between a PSA Airlines CRJ-700 and a U.S. Army UH-60L Black Hawk. Day 3 featured Panel 4: Collision Avoidance Technology and Panel 5: Safety Data and Safety Management Systems.

The hearing opened with spatial disorientation testimony and interviews with Army pilots about Route 4 altitude protections they incorrectly believed would keep them clear of Runway 33 arrivals. NASA’s Dr. Stephen Casner explained that cockpit traffic displays can help pilots spot targets up to eight times faster than by visual scan alone.

Experts detailed ADS-B system complexities — including the two incompatible broadcast frequencies (UAT and 1090ES) — and reviewed the limits of pre-ADS-B collision avoidance technology. The UH-60L Black Hawk lacks integrated traffic displays, relying instead on iPads with Stratus receivers, which Army policy prohibits the flying pilot from using. Portable ADS-B In devices provide only partial traffic pictures unless paired with ADS-B Out, limiting situational awareness.

Discussions turned to TCAS: its nuisance alert problem, differences for helicopter operations, and why the CRJ-700 lacks a certified ADS-B In solution. The NTSB Chairwoman confronted the FAA over its 17-year refusal to mandate ADS-B In, despite repeated post-collision recommendations. The Army is now procuring 1,685 Stratus/iPad sets for priority units, but operational use will still be limited at low level.

FAA data revealed 366 TCAS resolution advisories within 10 nm of DCA from 2023–2025. Testimony noted that crews involved in RAs are typically not notified unless a deviation occurs. Panelists debated safety culture, just culture, and leadership removals at DCA Tower after the accident. A controller supervisor described the pre-accident culture as “robust,” but post-accident changes removed key institutional knowledge.

The hearing also exposed gaps in PSA pilot special-qualification training for DCA — including no information on helicopter routes or operations — and examined simulator results showing that circling to Runway 33 can double or triple pilot workload compared to a straight-in to Runway 1.

Closing testimony on future ACAS XR technology indicated it could have alerted the Black Hawk crew 73 seconds before impact, with potential nationwide deployment by 2027. Max weaves these details into a narrative showing how technological shortfalls, flawed assumptions, procedural gaps, and cultural challenges all converged in this tragic midair — and what reforms could prevent a repeat.

NTSB Docket on Reagan National midair collision

Check out our other Aviation News Talk Network podcasts:

UAV News Talk Podcast 

Rotary Wing Show Podcast

Aviation News Talk

Max Trescott plays audio clips from Day 2 of the NTSB investigative hearing on the midair collision near Washington’s Reagan National Airport between a PSA Airlines CRJ-700 and a U.S. Army UH-60L Black Hawk. This day focused exclusively on Panel 3: Training, Guidance, and Procedures Applicable to DCA Air Traffic Control, revealing systemic issues that shaped the events leading to the accident.

A major theme was visual separation. Testimony explored the difference between pilot-applied and tower-applied visual separation in Class B airspace and the operational norm at DCA where helicopter pilots almost reflexively request pilot-applied visual separation. Experts explained how the unique combination of restricted airspace, helicopter routes, and runway configurations makes visual separation “paramount” for traffic flow, though it shifts collision avoidance responsibility to pilots. A U.S. Army pilot described the difficulty of spotting Runway 33 arrivals at low altitude, highlighting how these challenges contributed to the accident sequence.

Staffing emerged as a critical factor. The DCA tower had 19 fully operational controllers to cover 16 shifts a day, forcing position combinations such as merging tower and helicopter frequencies. Witnesses described high workload and a culture summed up by the phrase “just make it work,” raising questions about whether safety margins were being eroded. A management-level request to reduce arrival rates from 32 to 28 per hour due to safety concerns was denied, reportedly over political timing related to FAA reauthorization.

The hearing also examined miles-in-trail spacing, revealing inconsistent agreements between Potomac TRACON and DCA Tower and noting that arrivals were being fed at less than four miles apart before the accident. Conflict alert systems were scrutinized, with testimony that up to 50% of alerts are “nuisance alerts,” that could lead to controller desensitization. The Black Hawk’s lack of ADS-B Out was discussed, though radar coverage mitigated its effect on conflict alerting in this case.

Additional revelations included confusion over helicopter route altitudes, the tower’s downgrade from Level 10 to Level 9 (which resulted in new controllers being paid at a lower level than existing controllers), and an external compliance audit that found 33 areas of non-compliance—so severe the audit was halted and converted into an internal corrective action. The episode also covers the failure to conduct alcohol testing at all of controllers after the accident, contrary to the DOT’s two-hour requirement.

Max weaves over an hour of testimony into a narrative that exposes the intersection of human factors, training gaps, and systemic pressures inside one of the nation’s most complex airspace environments. The episode underscores how a combination of cultural norms, operational constraints, and safety oversight gaps set the stage for this tragic collision—and what must change to prevent future accidents.

NTSB Docket on Reagan National midair collision

Check out our other Aviation News Talk Network podcasts:

UAV News Talk Podcast 

Rotary Wing Show Podcast

Aviation News Talk

Max Trescott takes listeners deep inside Day 1 of the NTSB’s investigative hearing into the tragic midair collision near Washington’s Reagan National Airport between a PSA Airlines CRJ-700 and a U.S. Army UH-60L Black Hawk helicopter. The accident claimed the lives of 67 people, including the crew of both aircraft, and has become one of the most scrutinized airspace safety failures in recent history. In this episode of NTSB News Talk, Max distills over ten hours of testimony into 18 critical clips, delivering more than an hour of compelling audio that reveals surprising findings, heated exchanges, and systemic safety issues.

The day opened with an animated reconstruction of the collision showing the helicopter at 280 feet MSL—80 feet above the 200-foot altitude depicted for that segment of the published helicopter route—and the CRJ-700 at 290 feet on short final to DCA’s Runway 33. Panel 1, “Overview of Accident Helicopter’s Air Data Systems and Altimeters,” uncovered a significant problem with UH-60L altimeter accuracy. Test flights conducted after the accident revealed rotor downwash caused barometric altimeters to read 80–130 feet lower than true altitude at hover and cruise. Compounding the issue, transponder encoders legally transmit in 100-foot increments and can be off by up to 90 feet while still being “in spec.” The testimony underscored how cumulative tolerances could create a 100-foot discrepancy between left and right seat altimeters, even with properly maintained systems.

The hearing also exposed a fundamental difference in altitude standards between Army and civilian pilots. Army witnesses stated their standard is to maintain altitude within ±100 feet, meaning 300 feet would still be considered acceptable when targeting 200 feet MSL. Civilian operators, including medevac pilots accustomed to the DCA corridor, testified that in this airspace 200 feet is treated as a hard ceiling, not a target with a tolerance band. This cultural gap framed much of the day’s discussion.

Panel 2, “Overview of the DCA Class B Airspace and Helicopter Routes,” shifted focus to the unique and congested structure of Washington’s helicopter corridors. FAA representatives confirmed a startling fact: the altitudes on the published helicopter charts are “recommended” for VFR operations and are not regulatory unless specifically assigned by ATC. Likewise, drifting off the depicted route or exceeding the published altitude is not a violation unless ATC imposes a hard restriction. Yet multiple witnesses testified that in practice, both Army and civilian pilots, as well as controllers, treat the published routes and altitudes as mandatory. The disconnect between policy and operational understanding drew pointed questioning from the Board.

A recurring theme was the vulnerability of the route structure due to lack of consistent oversight. FAA orders require an annual review of the Baltimore-Washington helicopter route chart, but testimony revealed that DCA Tower has cycled through ten air traffic managers since 2013, with five in the last five years, making continuity of safety evaluations nearly impossible. A working group identified Route 4—the exact route used by the Black Hawk—as hazardous and attempted to mitigate risk by designating charted hotspots. FAA’s Aeronautical Information Services rejected the request on the grounds that “hotspot” symbology is limited to surface charts. NTSB members expressed frustration that bureaucratic charting standards overrode a direct safety recommendation from front-line controllers in the nation’s most complex helicopter environment.

One surprising revelation involved ADS-B compliance. The Army testified that less than 20% of its flights in the region flew with ADS-B Out enabled. Even worse, the investigation discovered that seven of eight Lima-model Black Hawks at Davison Army Airfield were misconfigured and not broadcasting ADS-B Out at all due to maintenance documentation errors during equipment installation. Although the Army issued an immediate safety action message once the problem was discovered, the finding highlights a significant blind spot in surveillance and collision avoidance in one of the busiest mixed-use airspaces in the country.

MedStar’s chief pilot, Rick Dressler, raised another critical point: pilot experience in the National Capital Region. Civilian medevac crews often log thousands of hours flying the DCA corridors over decades, developing an intimate understanding of priorities and flow in the Class B environment. By contrast, Army pilots rotate frequently, often with only a few hundred hours of experience in the airspace, and sometimes exhibit unfamiliarity with medevac priority protocols and heliport coordination. Dressler cited incidents where military helicopters blocked hospital pads, preventing civilian medevac landings with critically ill patients—a chilling illustration of cultural and procedural gaps.

The NTSB also explored training and proficiency, uncovering that aggregate flight hours among Army aviators have been declining for years. Where battalions once had “thousands and thousands” of collective cockpit hours, current totals are “hundreds and hundreds,” with many pilots flying just enough to meet minimum currency requirements rather than achieving deep proficiency. This trend, combined with complex airspace and limited local familiarity, creates layers of risk.

The day concluded with a tense exchange between NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy and FAA leadership over delays in providing data. Homendy blasted the agency for withholding critical information for six months, only delivering thousands of pages on the Friday before the hearing after intervention from the Secretary of Transportation. Her pointed “Do better” summed up the Board’s frustration with bureaucratic inertia in the face of a catastrophic loss of life.

As Day 2 approaches, focusing on training, guidance, and collision avoidance technology, this episode sets the stage for a deeper understanding of how a confluence of small gaps and misunderstandings led to one of the most devastating midair collisions in recent U.S. aviation history.

NTSB Docket on Reagan National midair collision

Check out our other Aviation News Talk Network podcasts:

UAV News Talk Podcast 

Rotary Wing Show Podcast

Aviation News Talk

Max and Rob bring listeners a packed episode of aviation safety lessons anchored by the NTSB. They begin with the Board’s announcement of a three-day investigative hearing into the Reagan National midair between a regional jet and a U.S. Army helicopter. Rob dives into a dramatic close call in North Dakota, where a Delta Regional Jet on final narrowly avoided a B-52 bomber crossing its flight path near Minot. The incident exposes communication gaps, contract tower limitations, and the critical need for radar and coordination between military and civilian traffic.

In Mexico City, a Delta A320 rejected a high-speed takeoff to avoid an AeroMexico E-190 landing over the top of it on the same runway. The event raises red flags about ATC language use, as Spanish transmissions prevented the Delta crew from maintaining situational awareness. Max explores the Hollister RV-8/Cirrus collision, highlighting how a relocated runway threshold and lack of radio calls can set the stage for disaster. A video of the midair was posted on Facebook.

AOPA's Sweepstakes Aviat A-1C-200 Husky was damaged in a landing incident, in which the pilot's left foot was misplaced an not on the rudder pedal.

A Murphy Aircraft Manufacturing Limited Moose airplane, N250MK, was destroyed when it was involved in a takeoff accident near Montrose, CO. According to the Preliminary NTSB report, two pilots on board were killed.

The Falcon 10 runway overrun in Panama City offers a textbook example of checklist discipline when thrust reversers failed due to switches left in the wrong position, turning deceleration into forward thrust. The AOPA Sweepstakes Husky mishap adds another cautionary tale about cockpit discipline and distractions.

The episode’s most personal moment comes when Rob shares his experience flying rusty in a G1000-equipped Cessna 182. Fatigue, cockpit visibility issues, haze, and a failed trim system combined to erode his performance and highlight how ego can mask risk. Max underscores the I’M SAFE checklist—illness, medications, stress, alcohol, fatigue, emotion—and how self-awareness can prevent tragedies. Together, they emphasize that open discussion and honest reflection are vital to improving safety and preventing accidents.

Check out our other Aviation News Talk Network podcasts:

UAV News Talk Podcast 

Rotary Wing Show Podcast

Aviation News Talk

Max Trescott and Rob Mark return for episode five of NTSB News Talk with a full slate of recent accidents and preliminary reports that highlight critical lessons in decision-making, mechanical failure, and situational awareness.

They start with the tragic crash of a Cirrus SR22 in North Carolina that killed a family of four. The aircraft had experienced electrical issues early in the flight, and despite indications of ongoing problems, the pilot chose to continue to the destination rather than land. Max emphasizes how what may seem like a minor issue—such as an alternator failure—can escalate, especially if the pilot doesn’t fully understand the systems or how cascading failures can emerge.

Next, they examine a mid-air collision in Steinbach, Manitoba between two Cessna training aircraft. Despite clear weather and an active pattern, both pilots were killed. Max reminds listeners that most mid-airs happen close to airports, often on final. Rob adds that see-and-avoid doesn’t always work, especially with sun glare or poor traffic sequencing.

They then move to a bizarre and poorly documented case of a Cessna T240 that departed Ramona, California and flew 400 miles offshore before descending into the Pacific. With no radio contact and the aircraft failing to respond to repeated ATC calls, the case raises the possibility of a medical event or incapacitation. The plane was never recovered.

A medical charter King Air crash in London, UK, is briefly discussed. The aircraft appeared to roll left and crash immediately after takeoff. Rob stresses the importance of immediate rudder input and pitch control following engine failure in twins.

A major focus of the episode is the preliminary report on Air India Flight 171, a Boeing 787 that lost both engines seconds after rotation. Both fuel cutoff switches moved from RUN to CUTOFF, then briefly back. One pilot is heard asking, “Why did you cut the fuel?” The other responds, “I didn’t do anything.” Rob and Max explore the implications of this odd event, especially in light of a 2018 FAA bulletin about fuel control switch locking mechanisms. Despite the non-mandatory nature of the bulletin, it directly referenced the potential for disengagement of the locking feature. Rob explains how the switches require a deliberate lift-and-pull action to move into CUTOFF, making accidental movement unlikely. Suicide and sabotage are also deemed improbable.

The discussion turns back to U.S. reports, including a crash in Montana where a Cessna 172 flew low and hit unmarked power lines. Max reiterates how hard it is to see wires until it's too late. Rob reflects on his own youthful low-level flying and how little awareness he had of such hazards at the time.

They then discuss a helicopter crash in Alaska. A Robinson R66 pilot operating in flat, snow-covered terrain under a 500-foot overcast likely experienced whiteout conditions and lost situational awareness. Max explains how disorientation is common in visually featureless environments—recounting his own night flight in hazy conditions where city lights and stars blurred together.

They also dissect a De Havilland Twin Otter crash in Tennessee during a skydiving flight. A left engine power loss forced a turnback attempt. The aircraft crashed into trees short of the runway, severely damaging the left wing and engine. Six people were seriously injured, though none killed. Rob questions the decision to add flaps during the emergency and notes the pilot’s inability to confirm if he secured the failed engine.

Finally, the hosts cover the NTSB final report of a 2023 Cessna 172 crash near San Rafael, CA. The pilot failed to apply carb heat during descent at night and suffered an engine failure. The aircraft struck a power line and terrain. Max references carb ice charts and highlights how even VFR conditions can require IFR-like vigilance, especially during nighttime descents.

The episode wraps with Rob pointing out a discrepancy between NTSB and FAA data on the aircraft’s engine model, and Max reminding pilots that modifying aircraft with STCs can create documentation mismatches.

Max Trescott and Rob Mark return for Episode 4 of NTSB News Talk with critical analysis and commentary on recent aviation accidents and safety investigations. The show kicks off with an update on the fatal Air India Flight 171 crash involving a Boeing 787, which resulted in 241 onboard deaths and 19 fatalities on the ground. A single survivor remains, and while early speculation surrounds the Ram Air Turbine deployment and potential engine failure, official conclusions await India's preliminary report, expected in three months.

The discussion then shifts to the LEAP-1B engine bird strike incidents involving Southwest Airlines Boeing 737 MAX jets. Both flights suffered bird ingestion leading to severe cockpit smoke—traced to a design issue where the Load Reduction Device (LRD) triggered an oil leak into the bleed air system. Though the FAA downplayed the threat, the NTSB issued a safety bulletin highlighting the potential risk, drawing parallels to the MCAS issue that plagued earlier MAX crashes.

Next, Max recaps the San Diego Citation S550 crash, which occurred during an LNAV approach at night. The pilot descended well below minimums—possibly misreading a military-only value of 500 feet on the approach chart. With no weather reporting available at Montgomery Field and several human factors at play, fatigue and poor decision-making appear to have contributed to the crash.

In Broomfield, Colorado, a Beechcraft Travel Air crashed after the pilot reported a door pop shortly after takeoff. The pilot flew an abnormally low pattern and lost control during the downwind leg, possibly due to a stall induced by slowed airspeed. Max and Rob stress that open doors are not emergencies and urge pilots to fly a normal pattern and maintain aircraft control.

Rob covers a fatal floatplane crash near Beaver Island, Michigan, where a homebuilt Avid Magnum impacted water during a low sightseeing pass. Though conditions were reported clear, satellite imagery later revealed smoke and haze that likely obscured the horizon. The glassy water conditions and lack of instrumentation may have contributed to the pilot's inability to perceive altitude, a classic seaplane hazard.

The show also reviews the in-flight breakup of a Cessna 182 in Reliance, Tennessee, caused by continued flight into a thunderstorm and turbulence beyond the aircraft’s maneuvering speed. Shockingly, the aircraft’s BRS parachute was deployed but not connected properly to the structure, rendering it useless.

Finally, the episode covers a Cessna 182RG crash in North Carolina. Witnesses reported an excessively nose-high attitude during a soft field takeoff attempt. The airplane stalled and crashed after barely lifting off. Investigators determined that the pilot likely failed to properly set the elevator trim before takeoff. Toxicology revealed the presence of Zyrtec, a sedating antihistamine, which Max points out is among the FAA’s “no-go” medications for pilots.

Throughout the episode, Max and Rob provide context, safety takeaways, and lessons learned that apply to general aviation pilots. Topics include fatigue, medication safety, proper emergency procedures, and the importance of weather briefings and adherence to approach minimums.

In this densely packed episode of NTSB News Talk, Max Trescott and Rob Mark discuss several major aviation accidents—ranging from high-profile international crashes to domestic general aviation incidents—emphasizing a recurring theme: loss of control due to distraction, poor decision-making, or misinterpretation of situational cues.

The show opens with breaking news: a catastrophic crash of an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner shortly after takeoff, killing 240 of the 241 people on board. Notably, this is the first fatal accident involving the Dreamliner since its certification. Speculation online points to configuration errors—photos show the gear was down and the flaps were up only seconds after liftoff. The aircraft hit a building a mile from the runway, raising concerns about takeoff mismanagement and checklist failures.

Max and Rob pivot to two significant upcoming NTSB hearings: the Alaska Airlines MAX 9 door plug blowout and the tragic midair collision between an American regional jet and an Army Blackhawk helicopter near Washington National Airport. Both hearings promise new details and will be livestreamed.

Next, they cover a dramatic crash involving a twin-engine Cessna 414 that departed San Diego’s busy Lindbergh Field and spiraled into the ocean. The ADS-B data showed erratic climbs, rapid descents (up to 10,000 feet per minute), and multiple full-circle turns. The pilot seemed confused about altitude assignments and configuration changes. Rob and Max speculate possible vacuum failure, misinterpretation of ATC instructions (e.g., mishearing “13,000” as “1,300”), or general lack of proficiency. They reference the previous day’s flight, captured by VASAviation, which revealed a series of small pilot errors including wrong altitudes, incorrect intercepts, and a runway incursion during taxi—painting a broader picture of degraded situational awareness.

Attention turns to the Transportation Safety Board of Canada’s preliminary report on the Endeavor Air CRJ-900 accident in Toronto. The aircraft landed in gusty crosswinds and crashed when the right main gear collapsed, resulting in a fiery rollover. Max details how the pilot flying likely reduced power too early in response to being five knots fast. That created a dangerous sink rate—exceeding 1,100 feet per minute just seconds before touchdown. Rob emphasizes how turbine aircraft handle differently from piston aircraft and questions whether the pilot’s limited experience (just over 1,400 hours) played a role. Remarkably, all passengers survived, a testament to fast-responding fire crews and luck.

The duo then examines a runway incursion at Chicago Midway, where a Flexjet Challenger taxied across an active runway just as a Southwest 737 was on short final. Airport surveillance video captured the close call. Fortunately, the Southwest crew initiated a go-around. Rob, based in Chicago, breaks down the confusing taxi route and notes that pilots had already read back one set of incorrect instructions earlier. Max stresses how helpful moving maps are for taxi navigation—especially at night or in unfamiliar airports.

Lastly, the hosts dissect a fatal Robinson R44 helicopter crash involving a student pilot near Miami, Texas. The pilot, flying solo on a cross-country, called a contact en route to express concern about fog. A witness on the ground said the helicopter looked unstable in low visibility conditions. There’s no record the pilot obtained a weather briefing. Rob questions whether the instructor should’ve proactively grounded the flight given poor weather. Max, drawing from his own training in the R44, emphasizes how most Robinson helicopters lack autopilots and are prohibited from entering IMC. Even pilots with instrument ratings often have no real cloud experience in helicopters, making VFR into IMC particularly deadly.

Throughout the episode, Rob and Max reinforce several key lessons:

• Always verify what you hear from ATC—and trust your instincts if something seems off.
• Monitor sink rates and power settings, especially in gusty or unfamiliar landing conditions. 
• Don’t ignore small errors; a string of minor issues can add up to major consequences.
• Moving maps and situational awareness tools can prevent runway incursions.
• Instructors have a moral obligation to monitor solo students—especially in marginal weather.

The hosts close by encouraging pilots to treat every flight with focus and humility, reminding us that no matter how advanced the aircraft, it’s still up to the pilot to fly the plane.

In this episode of NTSB News Talk, hosts Max Trescott and Rob Mark explore a series of recent general aviation accidents that underscore persistent issues around loss of control, distraction, weather misjudgment, and pilot training. The discussion is framed around several preliminary NTSB reports, each presenting scenarios where pilots encountered challenging situations and, in many cases, failed to maintain control of their aircraft.

They begin with the crash of a Rockwell Commander 114A in Hankamer, Texas. The pilot had taken his grandson on a pleasure flight from Baytown. ADS-B data showed casual maneuvering followed by a rapid, unexplained descent from 4,200 feet, with rates as high as 14,000 feet per minute and speeds over 200 knots. While weather data is incomplete, Max and Rob suspect the pilot may have been attempting to descend through a break in the clouds—leading to a spatial disorientation or loss of control scenario.

The conversation then moves to a fatal Piper Lance crash in Florida, caused by an unsecured nose baggage door. Surveillance video shows the door flapping open just after takeoff, and investigators found spilled contents—aviation oil and dog food—on the runway. Just 10 seconds later, the aircraft impacted the ground. Rob and Max explain that while such a distraction can be startling, it shouldn’t lead to a crash. Pilots need to remain calm and continue flying, especially during the critical initial climb phase.

A Saratoga crash, also in Florida, occurred during a night takeoff from Venice. Four people were killed. Max identifies the likely culprit: somatogravic illusion, in which acceleration during takeoff is misinterpreted by the brain as a climb. If no visual references are available—such as over water or on a moonless night—pilots may mistakenly push the nose down, leading to fatal descent. Rob emphasizes that night VFR can be as risky as IFR and urges pilots to brief night flights as if they're instrument flights. Max adds that despite being legal, flying in dark night conditions without an instrument rating is “crazy.”

Next is a Cessna 180 crash in Illinois. The aircraft departed during the day but returned amid mist and rain. The pilot, who lacked an instrument rating, hit wires and crashed, killing four. This highlights the risk of flying VFR into IMC and the human tendency to assume return conditions will mirror those from the outbound flight—a dangerous assumption in a dynamic weather environment.

The final accident involves a Cessna 177RG Cardinal in California. The pilot, who was in the traffic pattern for Grass Valley Airport, reported engine failure just before turning base. The aircraft crashed inverted near a road, just short of the runway. Rob stresses this was a basic emergency pilots are trained for—power-off landings—and wonders if other factors, such as distraction from a passenger, played a role. Max notes that today's busy traffic patterns make it difficult to practice power-off landings, though they remain a valuable skill.

The conversation broadens into general safety themes. Max recalls how his early flight training focused on always landing power-off, and he encourages pilots to train under varied conditions to remain sharp. Rob warns that many pilots shy away from training maneuvers for fear of damaging their engines, but believes this hesitancy erodes skills.

They also touch on situational awareness—what Max calls “the what-if game.” As pilots climb out, they should continuously consider where they'd land in an emergency, adjusting that plan as altitude increases. Rob echoes the value of mental preparedness, even at higher altitudes, where situational awareness should be constant. He critiques pilots who rely on Bluetooth music midflight, arguing that distractions—even subtle ones—undermine readiness.

A side discussion on bird strikes leads to a reminder that pilots must continue flying the airplane after unexpected events. Max recounts several bird strikes he’s experienced, including one involving a helicopter tail rotor. Rob notes that even startling events—like birds hitting the aircraft—must not overwhelm a pilot’s primary task: maintain control.

They conclude with a suggestion to focus a future episode on loss of control in flight, the underlying theme in many of the accidents discussed. Rob points out that too many pilots lose control when confronted with the unexpected, often because their training didn’t adequately prepare them to manage surprise or panic.

Max and Rob leave listeners with a clear takeaway: no matter what happens—whether it's a noise, an open door, a failed engine, or a dark sky—your first job is always the same: fly the airplane.

Max Trescott and Rob Mark launch the first episode of NTSB News Talk, diving into NTSB agency news, recent accidents and newly published NTSB reports to help pilots better understand accident causes and improve decision-making in the cockpit.

They begin with a surprising administrative shake-up: the unexplained termination of NTSB Vice Chairman Alvin Brown. Rob questions the lack of transparency, pointing out how an independent agency like the NTSB should not be subject to political scapegoating without clear justification. Max brings up that the NTSB is hiring.

Next, they turn to cockpit video recorders—a long-recommended safety item by the NTSB. While commercial pilots and unions resist them on privacy grounds, Max and Rob argue that video can play a vital role in understanding pilot behavior and causes of crashes, especially in general aviation where data is often limited. Rob references Matt Thurber’s editorial advocating for video recorders and highlights tools like CloudAhoy that already allow post-flight review.

The hosts then discuss several accidents. One involved a Cessna 207 in Alaska that crashed during a go-around, possibly due to a dog on the runway. They examine when it’s safer to land versus abort, and why go-around procedures—rarely practiced—are often poorly executed, even by experienced pilots.

Two Citabria crashes raise density altitude concerns. One near Big Creek, Idaho, ended with no survivors; the other, in Wyoming, occurred during a flight to spread ashes. A partial engine power loss, high terrain, and low climb capability proved fatal. Both hosts emphasize how critical it is for instructors to teach performance limitations in high-elevation operations, especially in underpowered aircraft.

Max talked about a Fireboss firefighting seaplane that ditched in the Atlantic, killing the pilot, while on a ferry flight to the Azores. He mentioned that experience ferry pilot Sarah Rovner talked in detail about ferry piloting issues in episode 379 of the Aviation News Talk podcast.

Another incident highlights poor weather decision-making. A Piper PA-28 crashed near Mount Equinox, Vermont after entering icing conditions in IMC. The non-instrument-rated pilot, traveling with family on a ski trip, stalled and crash-landed. The hosts explain how "get-there-itis" and poor weather avoidance can prove fatal, and caution against pressing on in marginal conditions—especially with passengers aboard.

The episode's deep dive analyzes the fatal accident of N611VG, a Citation 560 over Virginia. The pilot lost cabin pressure at high altitude and became incapacitated due to insufficient supplemental oxygen. The aircraft, operating Part 91, had numerous maintenance discrepancies—including an empty oxygen bottle and neglected pressurization issues. The pilot and passengers perished. Rob emphasizes that maintenance negligence is a silent killer, and guests aboard privately owned aircraft may have no idea about their true safety risks.

Max and Rob conclude with a discussion on high-altitude emergency procedures, including explosive decompression response. They urge pilots to practice rapid descents to VMO and recognize the signs of hypoxia before it’s too late. Finally, they encourage all pilots—regardless of experience—to schedule a flight review with an instructor to refresh skills like go-arounds and emergency descents.

This debut episode delivers clear, actionable safety lessons and insider insight into real-world aviation accidents. It’s a must-listen for pilots, CFIs, aircraft owners, and anyone serious about flight safety and learning from the NTSB’s findings.