
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this post Eliezer Yudkowsky argues that the existential risk posed by artificial superintelligence cannot be mitigated by individual action, corporate self-regulation, or localised prohibitions, but only by coordinated international law — specifically, a global treaty restricting the specialised hardware used to train and run frontier AI systems — and he systematically dismantles the notion that extralegal or violent resistance would be effective, on the grounds that shutting down any single company, researcher, or national datacenter does nothing to change the overall trajectory, while simultaneously making the case that lawful, predictable, avoidable state force is a categorically different thing from the chaotic violence some critics conflate it with.
https://x.com/ESYudkowsky/status/2043601524815716866
By Readings of great articles in AI voices5
44 ratings
In this post Eliezer Yudkowsky argues that the existential risk posed by artificial superintelligence cannot be mitigated by individual action, corporate self-regulation, or localised prohibitions, but only by coordinated international law — specifically, a global treaty restricting the specialised hardware used to train and run frontier AI systems — and he systematically dismantles the notion that extralegal or violent resistance would be effective, on the grounds that shutting down any single company, researcher, or national datacenter does nothing to change the overall trajectory, while simultaneously making the case that lawful, predictable, avoidable state force is a categorically different thing from the chaotic violence some critics conflate it with.
https://x.com/ESYudkowsky/status/2043601524815716866

91,090 Listeners

2,448 Listeners

850 Listeners

112,279 Listeners

214 Listeners

7,248 Listeners

6,450 Listeners

564 Listeners

5,554 Listeners

16,340 Listeners

12 Listeners

691 Listeners

405 Listeners

6 Listeners

1,146 Listeners