Picking Justice

By Harry Plotkin & Dan KramerBusiness Education Careers

Picking Justice episodes

November 17, 2025 Rahul Ravipudi – Pick One Voir Dire Philosophy and Commit
“You've gotten just tons of jurors off for cause, but you do it in the most polite way,” host Harry Plotkin says of longtime friend Rahul Ravipudi, who stops by “Picking Justice” to share his philosophy of voir dire that has helped him secure eight- and nine-figure verdicts. As Rahul explains to Harry and co-host Dan Kramer, his core philosophy is to stick with one voir dire approach. His is identifying juror biases and guiding biased jurors to excuse themselves for cause “or at least allow me to get the cause challenge established.” Tune in for Rahul’s insights about breaking the ice, handling jurors with misunderstandings about case facts, and determining when to announce damages numbers during mini-openings.
Learn More and Connect
☑️ Rahul Ravipudi | LinkedIn | Instagram
☑️ Panish Shea Ravipudi LLP | LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram
☑️ Harry Plotkin | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram
☑️ Dan Kramer | LinkedIn
☑️ Kramer Trial Lawyers on LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram
☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube
Produced and Powered by LawPods
Episode sponsored by Baldwin Settlements and Verdict Videos.
1 hr 4 min
November 03, 2025 Kathleen Nastri – Mastering Connecticut's Unique Jury Selection
Picture your voir dire happening in a private room where it’s just you and the potential juror. It’s called “individual sequestered voir dire,” it’s guaranteed in Connecticut’s constitution, and it’s an approach that Kathleen Nastri has mastered – as evidenced by her $58 million med-mal verdict, a state record. It can be exhausting, she admits. It can be like speed dating. But it reflects the importance that the state places on the right to a trial with a fair jury. In this conversation with hosts Harry Plotkin and Dan Kramer, Kathleen shares her strategies for breaking the ice with different jurors, her perceptions of female jurors in obstetrics cases, and her concerns about people who seem too eager to serve.
Learn More and Connect
☑️ Kathleen Nastri | LinkedIn | Instagram | X
☑️ Koskoff | LinkedIn | Facebook | X
☑️ Harry Plotkin | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram
☑️ Dan Kramer | LinkedIn
☑️ Kramer Trial Lawyers on LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram
☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube
Produced and Powered by LawPods
Episode sponsored by Baldwin Settlements and Verdict Videos.
59 min
October 20, 2025 Sean Claggett – From "Colorado Won't Give That" to “They Did” – $145 Million
“It is shocking how many times lawyers undervalue their cases,” says Sean Claggett, a pioneer in the use of big data and co-author of “JuryBall.” Coming off a $145 million workers' compensation bad faith verdict in Colorado – where a mediator told him, “Colorado juries don’t give the type of verdicts you’re talking about” – Sean shares how he uses big data and focus groups to determine true case value. In this conversation with hosts Harry Plotkin and Dan Kramer, he explains why anchoring themes early matters more than anchoring numbers and why conservative jurors can deliver the biggest verdicts when you push the right buttons. And he recaps what that mediator discovered: Colorado juries do give those verdicts.
Learn More and Connect
☑️ Sean Claggett | LinkedIn | Instagram
☑️ Claggett & Sykes | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | X
☑️ Harry Plotkin | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram
☑️ Dan Kramer | LinkedIn
☑️ Kramer Trial Lawyers on LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram
☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube
Produced and Powered by LawPods
Episode sponsored by Baldwin Settlements and Verdict Videos.
1 hr 6 min
October 06, 2025 Pat Salvi - Winning Even When the Defendant is Everyone's Hero
Everyone loves doctors. Pat Salvi’s firm sues them. When you know how to pick a good jury, he says, you can overcome the inherent likability factor. In this conversation with hosts Harry Plotkin and Dan Kramer, Pat reveals his strategies, starting with how he makes a connection with potential jurors. Tune in for his tips on exposing juror bias and focusing jurors on a doctor’s behavior, not personality. “It’s not about whether he's a good doctor or a nice guy,” he tells them. “It's whether or not he was reasonably careful under these circumstances.”
Learn More and Connect
☑️ Pat Salvi | LinkedIn | Instagram
☑️ Salvi, Schostok & Pritchard | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | X | YouTube | TikTok
☑️ Harry Plotkin | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram
☑️ Dan Kramer | LinkedIn
☑️ Kramer Trial Lawyers on LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram
☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube
Produced and Powered by LawPods
Episode sponsored by Baldwin Settlements and Verdict Videos.
1 hr 8 min
September 22, 2025 Kurt Zaner - Making Every Minute Count in 15- to 30-Minute Voir Dire
In Colorado, Kurt Zaner typically has 15 to 30 minutes for voir dire, so he makes every minute count. In this conversation with hosts Harry Plotkin and Dan Kramer, he explains how. “Even though you’ve got 15 minutes, the big points for me: I want to build a little rapport. I want them to trust me. I want them to feel empowered,” he says. From memorizing juror names to building credibility before discussing damages, Kurt describes strategies that he’s leveraged to secure victories like his $16 million premises liability verdict in Colorado, the state’s largest.
Learn More and Connect
☑️ Kurt Zaner | LinkedIn
☑️ Zaner Law | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | YouTube | TikTok
☑️ Harry Plotkin | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram
☑️ Dan Kramer | LinkedIn
☑️ Kramer Trial Lawyers on LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram
☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube
Produced and Powered by LawPods
Episode sponsored by Baldwin Settlements and Verdict Videos.
58 min
September 08, 2025 Craig Peters – “Give Me Two Days to Voir Dire the Whole Panel”
As a public defender, Craig Peters focused his voir dire on getting jurors to assure him they’d follow the law. Turns out that jurors can promise they’ll follow the law; it doesn’t mean they will. Now one of California's leading plaintiffs' trial attorneys with multiple eight-figure verdicts, Craig joins hosts Harry Plotkin and Dan Kramer to share what he’s learned about jury selection from practicing on both sides. He advocates, for example, for the opportunity to voir dire the entire jury panel rather than the traditional six-pack. “You're one of the only attorneys who I think I've talked to who actually is pushing this, to judges, to do the whole panel,” Dan observes. Tune in for Craig’s insights about why this strategy benefits jurors as well as lawyers, how to embrace bad facts in mini-openings, and why addressing juror biases head-on creates powerful courtroom themes.
Learn More and Connect
☑️ Craig Peters | LinkedIn
☑️ Altair Law | LinkedIn | Facebook | X
☑️ Harry Plotkin | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram
☑️ Dan Kramer | LinkedIn
☑️ Kramer Trial Lawyers on LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram
☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube
Produced and Powered by LawPods
Episode sponsored by Tisa Film and Baldwin Settlements.
1 hr 7 min
August 25, 2025 Randi McGinn - From Personal Loss to Powerful Voir Dire
"Has anyone here suffered profound grief?" Randi McGinn began asking jurors that question, particularly in wrongful death cases, after she suffered a personal loss. “It made me realize that people who've experienced that would be wonderful jurors,” she tells hosts Harry Plotkin and Dan Kramer. As she explains, savvy plaintiffs’ lawyers should identify jurors who have experienced grief and who can share their experience with other jurors. The first female president of the Inner Circle of Advocates, founding partner of McGinn Montoya Love Curry & Sievers, and author of “Changing Laws Saving Lives,” Randi reveals this and other jury selection strategies that have helped her secure nine-figure verdicts.
Learn More and Connect
☑️ Randi McGinn | LinkedIn
☑️ McGinn Montoya Love Curry & Sievers | LinkedIn | Facebook | X
☑️ Harry Plotkin | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram
☑️ Dan Kramer | LinkedIn
☑️ Kramer Trial Lawyers on LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram
☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube
Produced and Powered by LawPods
Episode sponsored by Tisa Film and Baldwin Settlements.
56 min
August 11, 2025 Making Every Second Count: To Voir Dire 35 Jurors in 20 Minutes
Twenty minutes to voir dire 35 jurors? “Hey, what’s your favorite ice cream? OK; I ran out of time.” That’s how host and jury consultant Harry Plotkin describes the challenging scenario – one of his favorite things to teach because “it can be done.” Host Dan Kramer, who soon goes to trial with Harry under these very rules, guides this discussion about how it can be done. Harry explains how he prioritizes individual questions over group questions to ensure that every juror is heard rather than focusing solely on cause challenges. He also outlines the top two or three questions he’d ask, depending on the type of case, and tips for spotting an “angry juror.”
Learn More and Connect
☑️ Harry Plotkin | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram
☑️ Dan Kramer | LinkedIn
☑️ Kramer Trial Lawyers on LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram
☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube
Produced and Powered by LawPods
Episode sponsored by Tisa Film and Baldwin Settlements.
43 min
July 28, 2025 David Ball - Stop Dreading Jury Selection, Start Enjoying It
Is this you before voir dire: “You're nervous, you've got a million things on your mind, you've lost 14 motions you wanted to win, and now you've got to question these people to find out who's going to kill you.” That’s the scenario that many lawyers find themselves in, suggests influential trial consultant David Ball, whose groundbreaking books like "David Ball on Damages 3" revolutionized plaintiff advocacy. In this conversation with hosts Harry Plotkin and Dan Kramer, David shares his strategies for putting aside fear and instead embracing “the privilege that you should enjoy having.” Tune in for his insights about why lawyers should practice before jury selection, how connecting with jurors on a human level puts you “ahead of the game,” and what the all-purpose follow-up question – "tell me about that" – reveals about jurors.
Learn More and Connect
☑️ David Ball | LinkedIn
☑️ Malekpour & Ball
☑️ Harry Plotkin | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram
☑️ Dan Kramer | LinkedIn
☑️ Kramer Trial Lawyers on LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram
☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube
Produced and Powered by LawPods
Episode sponsored by Tisa Film and Baldwin Settlements.
1 hr 8 min
July 14, 2025 The Best of the First 12 Episodes: Insights That Could Change Your Next Verdict
From Ibiere Seck's approach to making jurors feel valued, to Steve Vartazarian's mantra to “choose topics wisely,” to Gary Dordick's strategy for timing bias discussions, this episode of “Picking Justice” compiles the best moments from the podcast’s first 12 episodes. In addition to their wisdom, tune in for insights from Lourdes DeArmas, Ricardo Echeverria, Joe Fried, Arash Homampour, Khail Parris, Claire Plotkin, Bob Simon and the hosts themselves: Harry Plotkin and Dan Kramer. And come back for future episodes with conversations that could change your next verdict.
Learn More and Connect
☑️ Ibiere Seck | LinkedIn | Instagram | X | Facebook
☑️ Ricardo Echeverria I LinkedIn
☑️ Steve Vartazarian | LinkedIn
☑️ Gary Dordick | LinkedIn | Instagram
☑️ Claire Plotkin | LinkedIn | X
☑️ Arash Homampour | LinkedIn
☑️ Joe Fried | LinkedIn
☑️ Bob Simon | LinkedIn | X | Facebook | Instagram | YouTube | Website 2
☑️ Lourdes DeArmas | LinkedIn
☑️ Khail Parris | LinkedIn
☑️ Harry Plotkin | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram
☑️ Dan Kramer | LinkedIn
☑️ Kramer Trial Lawyers on LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram
☑️ Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube
Produced and Powered by LawPods
35 min

About Picking Justice

From the publisher's feed

Attention Trial Lawyers: You’ve meticulously crafted your opening statement, mastered your directs and crosses, and fine-tuned your closing argument. But have you developed a strategy for jury selection? What will you do when a potential juror gives an unexpected answer? Do you even want that person on your jury? The clock is ticking — you need to think fast.