The Dispatch Podcast

Principle vs. Prudence


Listen Later

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death on Friday immediately kickstarted a battle among conservative pundits and politicians over the prudence of pushing through a Supreme Court nominee before November 3. The first problem is that mail-in voting is already under way, meaning Republicans would technically be advancing a nominee during an election. Republicans have also been hypocrites about this in the past with their opposition to Merrick Garland’s hearing in 2016. Steve thinks we should push through a nominee, but David, Jonah, and Sarah are more sympathetic to arguments that Trump should nominate a justice and the Senate should wait to confirm until after the election, keeping in mind Democrats’ threats to throw out the filibuster, pack the court, and add Puerto Rico and D.C. to the union if Republicans have their way with Trump’s forthcoming nominee.

David and Jonah propose a deal: If Trump wins, the Senate confirms his nominee; if Biden wins, he agrees not to pack the court. Others argue that confirming a justice during an election year is just politics, meaning whichever party is in power gets to do whatever it wants. But what about principled conservatism? “My main critique of philosophical pragmatism is we are now talking about basically saying power decides every question of principle,” Jonah says on today’s podcast. This puts Republicans and conservatives in a bind, he argues, “particularly because for the last give or take 5,000 years, one of the jobs of conservatives has been to make a distinction between things you can do and things you should do.” Tune in for a conversation about the forthcoming attacks on Amy Coney Barrett’s Catholic faith should she be Trump’s nominee, the upcoming presidential debate next week, and the New York Times’ eagerness to rewrite its own history surrounding the 1619 Project.


Show Notes:

-“As U.S. Supreme Court nomination looms, a religious community draws fresh interest” in Reuters, “Vote on President Trump’s Nomination, Senators—the Sooner the Better” by Matthew J. Franck in The Dispatch, and the New York Times’ 1619 Project.

-Check out our The Dispatch30 day free trial of .

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

The Dispatch PodcastBy The Dispatch

  • 4.6
  • 4.6
  • 4.6
  • 4.6
  • 4.6

4.6

3,037 ratings


More shows like The Dispatch Podcast

View all
3 Martini Lunch by Current events, satire, humor news by Radio America

3 Martini Lunch

1,496 Listeners

GLoP Culture by Ricochet

GLoP Culture

1,789 Listeners

The Ricochet Podcast by Ricochet

The Ricochet Podcast

1,372 Listeners

The Commentary Magazine Podcast by Commentary Magazine

The Commentary Magazine Podcast

4,859 Listeners

The Fifth Column by Kmele Foster, Michael Moynihan, and Matt Welch

The Fifth Column

2,829 Listeners

The Editors by National Review

The Editors

4,790 Listeners

The Reason Roundtable by The Reason Roundtable

The Reason Roundtable

1,501 Listeners

The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg by The Dispatch

The Remnant with Jonah Goldberg

6,392 Listeners

The McCarthy Report by National Review

The McCarthy Report

2,806 Listeners

Advisory Opinions by The Dispatch

Advisory Opinions

3,759 Listeners

Honestly with Bari Weiss by The Free Press

Honestly with Bari Weiss

8,602 Listeners

Ink Stained Wretches by Nebulous Media

Ink Stained Wretches

761 Listeners

Good Faith by Good Faith

Good Faith

1,896 Listeners

The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast by National Review

The Charles C. W. Cooke Podcast

1,042 Listeners

How The World Works by Kevin D. Williamson

How The World Works

196 Listeners