Psyche

In this first episode of a new series within Psyche Podcast, I begin a deep dive into Jon Mills’ Inventing God: Psychology of Belief and the Rise of Secular Spirituality by reflecting on the introduction and the enduring psychological power of the God idea.

I explore why human beings seem so drawn to ultimate explanations, how desire and imagination shape belief, and why spiritual hunger may tell us as much about the structure of the psyche as it does about theology. I also make clear that, although my own position in life is a kind of agnostic atheism, I am not interested in mocking faith or reducing religion to something simplistic.

Many of my clients are deeply religious, and we often find deeply meaningful ways of relating to each other across those differences. This episode opens the series by asking a philosophical, psychoanalytic, and deeply human question: why God at all?

In this episode of Psyche Podcast, I explore Stanley Cavell’s understanding of skepticism, finitude, and acknowledgment, and why I think his work matters so deeply for psychotherapy. Rather than treating skepticism as a merely abstract philosophical problem, Cavell helps us see it as one of the central ways human beings try to evade the truth of their own condition. We want certainty, we want guarantees, we want to get beyond vulnerability, separateness, and the limits of human knowledge, and yet Cavell invites us to consider that the task is not to escape those conditions, but to live within them more honestly.

I reflect on Cavell’s profound insight that human community is not about overcoming isolation so much as learning how to share it, and I connect that vision to the therapy room, where healing so often has less to do with certainty than with acknowledgment, answerability, and presence. Along the way I explore how Cavell offers a powerful alternative to both metaphysical overreach and cynical despair, and why his philosophy gives us such a rich language for thinking about relationships, suffering, and what it means to meet another person without illusion.

In this episode, I explore Stanley Cavell alongside Ludwig Wittgenstein and reflect on the idea that the therapist can, in an important sense, be understood as a kind of ordinary language philosopher. I talk about first encountering Cavell years ago in seminary in a social ethics class with Dr. Jonathan Tran, and why Cavell’s way of thinking about voice, acknowledgment, skepticism, and the ordinary has stayed with me ever since. From there, I trace how Wittgenstein’s therapeutic vision of philosophy and Cavell’s deepening of ordinary language philosophy can help us think differently about what is happening in the therapy room.

Along the way, I explore how people often suffer not only from pain itself, but from words that have become rigid, totalizing, and hard to live inside; how therapy can sometimes work by loosening the grip of those descriptions; and why solution-focused questions can serve as interventions into grammar, possibility, and perception rather than mere information gathering. I also spend time with several beautiful passages from Cavell on forms of life, the uncanny return of the familiar, and the search not for final answers so much as directions worth the time of a life to discover. This is an episode about language, skepticism, acknowledgment, and the quiet, demanding work of helping someone come back into voice.

In this episode in my Philosophy and Solution-Focused Therapy series, I reflect on Quentin Tarantino’s Kill Bill through the lens of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s idea that meaning is use. After a recent client urged me to finally watch the film, I did, for the first time, and absolutely loved it. What especially stayed with me were the scenes between the Bride and Pai Mei, where repetition, correction, action, and discipline begin to look like more than just training. They begin to look like a philosophy of practice.

I explore how Wittgenstein’s thought helps us see that understanding is not primarily a hidden inner possession, but something that takes shape in use, in action, in learning how to go on within a form of life. From there, I connect Pai Mei’s brutal pedagogy to psychotherapy, and especially to solution-focused therapy’s attention to small actions, exceptions, patterns, and the lived practices through which change becomes possible.

Along the way, I consider what Kill Bill reveals about repetition, mastery, embodiment, and the difference between having an idea and being formed into a capacity. This is an episode about training, meaning, action, and the ways new futures become real not only through insight, but through practice.

In this episode, I explore Wittgenstein’s idea of forms of life and what he once called the “whole hurly-burly of human actions,” that living background of practices, relationships, gestures, expectations, and shared meanings within which anything we say or feel can make sense at all. I reflect on the temptation, in both philosophy and psychotherapy, to reduce reality to atomistic parts, hidden inner objects, or eternal foundations, and I make the case that human suffering cannot be understood apart from the swarm of life in which it takes shape.

Along the way, I bring this into a clinical register, thinking about anxiety, identity, autism, couples work, and the ways therapy can become less about isolating explanatory units and more about listening for the background against which a life becomes legible. I also weave in a line from Wittgenstein that has stayed with me deeply: “Perhaps what is inexpressible … is the background against which whatever could express has its meaning.” This is an episode about context, mystery, collaboration, and the living weave of human life where both suffering and change become possible.

In this episode of Psyche Podcast, I continue my series on the philosophical foundations of solution-focused therapy by doing a close reading of Nick Drury’s essay “Wittgenstein and the Tikanga of Psychotherapy.” Drawing on Wittgenstein’s later philosophy, Drury challenges the Cartesian and medicalized picture of the person that has shaped so much of modern mental health discourse, and instead invites us into a vision of therapy rooted in language, relationship, ethical responsiveness, and forms of life. He also explicitly connects Wittgenstein’s idea of “disappearing” problems through a changed way of living to solution-focused therapy’s way of working.  

I use the episode to explore why solution-focused therapy is so often misunderstood as simplistic when, in fact, it rests on a deeply serious philosophical vision of human life. Along the way, I unpack Drury’s distinction between “know that” and “know how,” his critique of diagnosis-heavy and decontextualized models of care, and his account of therapy as a space where new language-games, new forms of relation, and new possibilities for living can emerge.  

I also bring these ideas down to the level of practice with vivid clinical examples, showing how a Wittgensteinian and solution-focused sensibility can shift the way we listen, the way we ask questions, and the way we understand change itself. This is an episode about clarity, humility, and the ethical depth of therapy when it becomes less a laboratory of explanation and more a living conversation in which people can begin to speak and live differently together.

In this episode of Psyche Podcast, I continue my Philosophy & Solution-Focused Therapy series by turning to Steve de Shazer’s essay, “Don’t Think, But Observe: What Is the Importance of the Work of Ludwig Wittgenstein for Solution-Focused Brief Therapy?” In it, I explore why Wittgenstein matters so deeply to Solution-Focused Brief Therapy, not because he gives it some hidden grand theory, but because he helps us see why the longing for that kind of theory can pull us away from the living reality of therapy itself. I reflect on de Shazer’s argument that meaning is rooted in use, in context, in forms of life, and I consider what that means for a therapeutic practice that refuses to get trapped in diagnostic abstraction and instead stays close to language, relationship, exception, and observable change. Along the way, I make the case that Solution-Focused Therapy is far more philosophically serious than its critics often assume, and that its restraint, its precision, and its attention to what is actually happening in a person’s life may be part of what makes it so radical.

In this episode of Psyche Podcast, I continue my series on the philosophy behind solution-focused therapy by taking up a fascinating and delicate question: can Ludwig Wittgenstein be understood as an autistic man, and if so, what might that help us see about his philosophy, about neurodivergence, and about therapy itself?

Drawing from Alan Griswold’s essay on Wittgenstein, along with broader reflections on Wittgenstein’s life and thought, I explore the limits of retrospective diagnosis while still taking seriously the possibility that his relationship to language, precision, social life, and meaning may have emerged from a distinctly neurodivergent form of experience.

From there, I connect Wittgenstein’s ideas about language-games, meaning, and forms of life to a more humane and expansive way of understanding autism. I also connect those ideas to the spirit of solution-focused therapy, with its deep attention to language, lived reality, and the creation of more workable futures.

This is an episode about philosophy, neurodivergence, and what becomes possible when we stop treating difference simply as defect and begin listening for a different grammar of being.

In this episode, I begin a loose new series exploring the philosophical influences behind Solution-Focused Therapy, especially the work of Steve de Shazer. Too often, Solution-Focused Therapy gets caricatured as simplistic, overly optimistic, or not serious enough about suffering. I argue that this misses something much deeper. Beneath its lightness of touch is a remarkably sophisticated way of thinking about language, change, and the construction of possibility.

I offer a biographical sketch of de Shazer and then trace some of the major intellectual currents that help illuminate his work, including Wittgenstein, pragmatism, Derrida, and Paul de Man. Along the way, I reflect on why Solution-Focused Therapy may be less about uncovering the hidden truth of a problem and more about helping create new descriptions that make different futures imaginable.

This is an episode about language, suffering, restraint, and the quiet radicalism of asking a different kind of question.

In this episode, I explore a question that has followed Richard Rorty for years and feels especially urgent now: did his pragmatism, and his rejection of universal foundations for truth, help create the post-truth culture we are living in? Drawing from Eduardo Mendieta’s article “Rorty and Post-Post-Truth” in the Los Angeles Review of Books, I argue that this is ultimately a caricature of Rorty. What Rorty challenged was not facts, evidence, or public accountability, but the fantasy that truth requires a metaphysical guarantee outside human history, language, and democratic life. Rather than leading to cynicism or political manipulation, his work points us back to the communal labor of justification and to the fragile social conditions that make truthfulness possible at all.

I also make the case that what has far more plausibly given rise to our post-truth moment is the erosion of social trust, the collapse of social capital, and the polarizing effects of algorithmic media environments that reward outrage, identity, and reaction over shared inquiry. So this becomes not just an episode about Rorty, but about what democratic culture needs in order for truth to have public life at all.