"This analysis has demonstrated through 30 universal laws, empirically validated across
16 years and $1.83 trillion in market capitalization, that Bitcoin represents a genuine phase transition in monetary coordination.
It is the first system deriving legitimacy from thermodynamic irreversibility rather than
social consensus or institutional authority. The implications extend beyond finance."
— Shanaka Anslem Parera

If money has always depended on kings, banks, and belief… what does it mean to have a monetary system whose legitimacy comes from raw energy and math? I read a wildly ambitious analysis that tries to quantify Bitcoin’s “thermodynamic transition,” then I pull it apart in my own words and dig into what the data might really be telling us.

Is Bitcoin just another asset bubble, or a once-in-millennia break with the way money has always worked?

Check out the original article The Thermodynamic Monetary Transition by Shanaka Anslem Perera (Link: https://substack.com/inbox/post/179349077)

Check out our awesome sponsors!

Host Links