Bodycount, the concept gripping the internet over the last month, refers to the number of sexual partners a person has had. The concepts prevalence emerged through the online RedPill space and has become a key term in the backlash against 'sex positivity' over the last few years. In a dating world now defined by apps, the internet, and, increasingly, a renewed traditional system of sexual value, in what way is 'bodycount' supposed to matter socially? Is it possible to instead think of our sexual partners as subjects, with personal histories that are meaningful, rather than as property or objects?

We discuss a 'pro-women argument' for men paying on dates, research that undermines naturalist perspectives on paternity, and criticise evolutionary psychology's perspectives about men and women's different sexual tendencies. We also discuss why some gay people still remain closeted, claim lesbians and gay men are perhaps representative of their sexes preferred sexual relations because they show how each group behaves when unmediated by the other, and consider how late-stage capitalism is beginning to undermine patriarchy. 

Other topics include casual sex as self-harm, clocking into triple digits at lesbian festivals, polyamory as 'sexual HR' organising people romantically as consumable products, and how those who are 'poly' tend to be dissatisfied and dissatisfying immature perverts who never achieve emotional intimacy with anyone.  We also ask why do gay men not have solidarity with one another in the way straight men do? And whether heterosexual men can ever get over their neurotic retrospective jealousy about their partners previous love lives?

Recent SWP member and NEU Regional Secretary Simon Murch plead guilty to the rape of a child under 13 on September 4th 2023. This episode is about the culture of far Left groups, Jen's experiences in the SWP during the 'Comrade Delta' period a decade ago, wherein the de facto General Secretary of the SWP sexually abused two teenage girls, and asks the question: why does the far-Left attract men intent on sexually abusing children? Given the far-Left wishes to liberate humanity and replace present society with one based on its own ethical and moral vision, that it believes to be superior, why is the sexual abuse of children considered so insignificant to the organised groups on the far-Left? The episode includes discussion of morality and moralism, the difference between the 'woman question' and the 'feminist question', and an update at the end that comments on the SWP's inadequate statement on Simon Murch. 

This episode explores the two key reasons that the moronic Left seeks to brand gender critical women (slurred as 'TERFs') as fascists. Firstly, we discuss that no one seems to know what an actual fascist is anymore and so the label is applied haphazardly and erroneously as an attempt to discredit any and all opposition to Transgenderism. Secondly, that it's an attempt to apply No Platform to gender critical women (historically, the tactic of No Platform was used only against fascists) in order to shut down debate, whilst also legitimising violent tactics (again, historically, it was only fascists that were considered dangerous enough that street violence could be used against them. Today, Trans Rights Activists seek to move gender critical women into the category 'fascist' so that violence against them becomes justified). The episode uses the example of McLibel defendant and Spy Cop victim Helen Steel, leftwing activist royalty within the UK, now branded a 'fascist' despite decades of work on the Left. Plus, the Melbourne Let Women Speak event and how the above reasoning played out against the women who gathered there.

This episode leads with the mugshot from Trump's recent arrest and the paving of his way to power by his inept political opponents. That discussion enters into a wider conversation about what exactly the hell is MAGA communism? In relation to that, we consider Cuba, the EFF, Palestine, Venezuela, and the BRICS system, plus the revolutionary process and its combined subjective and objective conditions. The last part of the episode deals with Oliver Anthony's viral song Rich Men North of Richmond and how it has fast become a working class anthem, transcending political divides in America.

The backlash to sexual liberalism is here. Using Youtuber Logan Paul's recent experience of online trolling that has broken the internet, this episode discusses the shift from Millennial 'sex positivity' to its reversal now captivating Gen-Z, with women's value measured by their sexual discretion, rather than how sexually available they are (and how this is a wider contextual shift from modern leftwing patriarchy to traditional rightwing patriarchy). That includes the end of the concept 'slut shaming' and the new incredibility of the 'slut walks' only 10 years ago. This turn is in part due to the popularity of Red Pill online content that draws on neuroscience, evolutionary psychology, and mysticism. A highly critical appraisal of the worth of neuroscience and evolution in regard to psychology forms the mid-section of this episode. That leads to a discussion of this summer's Adam22 'cuck porn' incident and how turning wives and girlfriends into capital through digital pimping is becoming considered obscene and a way for even a rich or famous man to fail and become a 'sexual loser'.

The episode ends with exploring the meaninglessness of the term 'pretty', and yet more discussion of British culture, specifically the inability to take compliments and the knee-jerk reaction of considering any reference to sex as comical.

Would we Russia 1917 the Royals? Find out! This episode imagines the inner life of the British Royal Family, with speculation about its members, their marriages, and merges a sex-based and class-based critique of the aristocracy in Britain. We speculate that the inner Royals are quite miserable, consider that perhaps Charles and Camilla are an example of an epic 'love story', and comment on Prince Harry's obvious oedipal behaviour via Freud's theory of the compulsion to repeat. Includes wider discussion about the rumour that posh men are ineffective lovers, the British cultural adoration for queuing,  and the inner Protestant wish to be punished by nanny. The episode ends with a call for Princess Anne to ascend the throne and Hannah exposes Jen's shocking deviation away from communism by sympathetically watching the Queen's funeral.

We review Greta Gerwig's new film, Barbie, and discuss its themes and representations. That includes the "Alan" men who don't do well in patriarchy, Ti Grace Atkinson's structural model of lesbians as rebels, Daily Wire commentator Michael Knowles interestingly correct take on the film, and the vital question of whether Margot Robbie is mid? We also discuss women wanting to be possessed by men, Jen's crush on Jodie Foster, decontructive comedy, Amy Schumer as Barbie, and more.

WARNING: This episode includes spoilers.

Is collective suffering worse than private suffering? i.e what would cause the greatest suffering for women, a status as public property or private property? We discuss traditional vs. modern patriarchy, and consider the contemporary far-Left's vision for women as achieving liberation through surrogacy, prostitution, and transgenderism. Later contrasting that with Sharia (women as private property) and also conservative men's understanding of women as happiest if wives, homemakers, and mothers. The episode includes a section on the most famous woman of the Russian Revolution, Alexandra Kollontai, her anti-feminism, and a life serially taking Ls from leftist men. We end with how women on the political right are often 'girl bosses', whilst leftwing women contrastingly submissive, and the impossibility of interrupting a Mormon woman.

Is Trad, short for traditionalism, the new punk? If the Left are now known for their policing, liberalism, and infantilism, how could rejecting that not be appealing? If HR departments are increasingly dominated by liberal ideology, and the Left have not stepped up as todays rebels, then it is traditionally rightwing ideas that can start to fill that void and offer opposition. In a climate where home ownership and raising children becomes increasingly economically unaffordable for young people, marriage and kids becomes a flex of wealth and success. Rejecting porn in favour of traditional relationships, going to church, owning a property within a natural setting, and the permanent values attached to these, offer an alternative to meaningless sex, relentless commodity acquisition, chaotic market free fall, and the superficialness of the internet. But can Trad really be punk when it proposes a return to the past and essentially a renewed conservatism? Listen and decide!

Jen tells the story of the 'racist kinky chair' that split a socialist group, a premonition of how the declining and dilapidated far-Left would increasingly operate in the Global North. Episode also features discussion of Lacan's famous line 'there is no such thing as a sexual relationship', Butler's justification of pornography through deconstructionism, misunderstandings of Wittig's 'lesbians aren't women', and how polyamory results in treating sexual partners like products. We finish on the alienation present in transgenderism and inside the neoliberal workplace, where people are treated as subjects to be commodified to the greatest extent possible.