
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Nearly four years. That's how long Kouri Richins has maintained her innocence since Eric Richins died from a fentanyl overdose in March 2022. Through investigation, arrest, preliminary hearings, a children's book tour, and now a five-week trial. Robin Dreeke — former FBI behavioral analyst who spent 21 years with the Bureau including leading the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program — explains what sustaining a lie that long actually requires, where the cracks typically appear, and what Kouri's courtroom behavior reveals.
The prosecution says Kouri positioned insurance policies for years, sourced fentanyl through her housekeeper Carmen Lauber, and poisoned her husband for money. The defense says the physical evidence doesn't exist — no fentanyl found in the home, the glasses went through the dishwasher, the pill bottle wasn't tested — and the key witness is an immunized meth user whose own supplier now contradicts her.
Dreeke breaks down the behavioral indicators that separate genuine shock from practiced performance. Kouri has sat composed through five days of testimony describing how she allegedly murdered her husband. That composure reads differently depending on what you're looking for. Dreeke identifies the specific micro-behaviors that would indicate which interpretation is accurate.
He also assesses the witnesses. Carmen Lauber's credibility has taken hits — meth use, three immunity deals, confusion under cross. Her supplier Robert Crozier originally said fentanyl but testified Friday it was oxycodone. When witnesses have this much baggage, how do you assess what's still true? And when physical evidence is absent, at what point does behavioral evidence — the searches, the insurance, the coded requests — become more persuasive than what's missing?
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KouriRichins #EricRichins #RobinDreeke #FBI #RichinsTrial #CarmenLauber #DeceptionDetection #BehavioralAnalysis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime
By Hidden Killers Podcast2.3
2525 ratings
Nearly four years. That's how long Kouri Richins has maintained her innocence since Eric Richins died from a fentanyl overdose in March 2022. Through investigation, arrest, preliminary hearings, a children's book tour, and now a five-week trial. Robin Dreeke — former FBI behavioral analyst who spent 21 years with the Bureau including leading the Counterintelligence Behavioral Analysis Program — explains what sustaining a lie that long actually requires, where the cracks typically appear, and what Kouri's courtroom behavior reveals.
The prosecution says Kouri positioned insurance policies for years, sourced fentanyl through her housekeeper Carmen Lauber, and poisoned her husband for money. The defense says the physical evidence doesn't exist — no fentanyl found in the home, the glasses went through the dishwasher, the pill bottle wasn't tested — and the key witness is an immunized meth user whose own supplier now contradicts her.
Dreeke breaks down the behavioral indicators that separate genuine shock from practiced performance. Kouri has sat composed through five days of testimony describing how she allegedly murdered her husband. That composure reads differently depending on what you're looking for. Dreeke identifies the specific micro-behaviors that would indicate which interpretation is accurate.
He also assesses the witnesses. Carmen Lauber's credibility has taken hits — meth use, three immunity deals, confusion under cross. Her supplier Robert Crozier originally said fentanyl but testified Friday it was oxycodone. When witnesses have this much baggage, how do you assess what's still true? And when physical evidence is absent, at what point does behavioral evidence — the searches, the insurance, the coded requests — become more persuasive than what's missing?
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#KouriRichins #EricRichins #RobinDreeke #FBI #RichinsTrial #CarmenLauber #DeceptionDetection #BehavioralAnalysis #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

12,030 Listeners

10,965 Listeners

113,458 Listeners

369,857 Listeners

19,123 Listeners

47,424 Listeners

2,018 Listeners

600 Listeners

10,310 Listeners

8,184 Listeners

7,400 Listeners

8,324 Listeners

98 Listeners

904 Listeners

23 Listeners

110 Listeners

10 Listeners

62 Listeners

229 Listeners

609 Listeners

7 Listeners

8 Listeners

5 Listeners

16 Listeners

5 Listeners

12 Listeners

6 Listeners

5 Listeners

5 Listeners

2 Listeners