Surfing the MASH Tsunami

S3-E26 - What Are We Learning About Clinical Trial Best Practices For NITs?


Listen Later

Send us Fan Mail

Quentin Anstee joins Stephen Harrison, Jörn Schattenberg, Louise Campbell and Roger Green to share recently developed insights about NITs and what the clinical trial best practices around them should be. Quentin started by offer five key takeaways from his recent talks at The Liver Forum and ICFL in Vienna:

(1) As we have discussed on this podcast and elsewhere, trial endpoints around balloon hepatocytes are, in Quentin's words, "not sufficiently robust." 
(2) Rapidly attaining response from a given test (ALT, for example) is not necessarily a guarantee of early efficacy. 
(3) "Simple indirect biomarker panels like FIB-4" need to be interpreted with caution. 
(4) Since we do not have a single perfect gold standard test (neither histological nor non-invasive), we should consider a standard for clinical trial assessment that is a composite of multiple different types of tests, perhaps one liquid, one physical (MRE?) and one histological. 
(5) We need to develop a battery of NITs that are both applied and reported in all cases, instead of running large numbers of NITs and only reporting the ones that support the targeted medication. 

This stimulating set of opening comments motivates the group to dive deeply into the entire issue of how we deploy and analyze NITs. One key question is longitudinal. Quentin points out that early response to a composite test (like FIB-4) might not suggest endpoint efficacy over time. Similar to this, it also suggests that a positive 26-week result in a composite or liquid test might not mean much if the drop comes in the first couple of weeks and then maintains the lower level the next few months. This leads Stephen to suggest that researchers evaluate change at three levels: early change, late change, sustained change. It also leads to a discussion of "stacking" tests so that a respondent would need to achieve multiple successful test scores for the researcher to be confident that the patient's response is positive. 

These are only a few insights from a far larger set that emerges during this discussion. Dive in for yourself to see what you find most intriguing.

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Surfing the MASH TsunamiBy SurfingNASH.com

  • 3.9
  • 3.9
  • 3.9
  • 3.9
  • 3.9

3.9

24 ratings


More shows like Surfing the MASH Tsunami

View all
Freakonomics Radio by Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher

Freakonomics Radio

32,087 Listeners

Planet Money by NPR

Planet Money

30,693 Listeners

Pivot by New York Magazine

Pivot

9,629 Listeners

DOC Updates by American Diabetes Association

DOC Updates

104 Listeners

The School of Greatness by Lewis Howes

The School of Greatness

21,149 Listeners

The Curbsiders Internal Medicine Podcast by The Curbsiders Internal Medicine Podcast

The Curbsiders Internal Medicine Podcast

3,366 Listeners

The Daily by The New York Times

The Daily

112,144 Listeners

Up First from NPR by NPR

Up First from NPR

56,553 Listeners

The Indicator from Planet Money by NPR

The Indicator from Planet Money

9,528 Listeners

The Peter Attia Drive by Peter Attia, MD

The Peter Attia Drive

8,027 Listeners

All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg by All-In Podcast, LLC

All-In with Chamath, Jason, Sacks & Friedberg

10,182 Listeners

Consider This from NPR by NPR

Consider This from NPR

6,398 Listeners

EASL Podcasts by European Association for the Study of the Liver

EASL Podcasts

0 Listeners

Docs Who Lift by Docs Who Lift

Docs Who Lift

427 Listeners

The Headlines by The New York Times

The Headlines

745 Listeners