
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


To prevent the collapse of the global financial system in 2008, The Treasury committed 245 billion in taxpayer dollars to stabilize America’s banking institutions. Today, banks that were once “too big to fail” have only grown bigger. Were size and complexity at the root of the financial crisis, or do calls to break up the big banks ignore real benefits that only economies of scale can pass on to customers and investors? The debaters are Richard Fisher, Simon Johnson, Douglas Elliott, and Paul Salzman.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
By Open to Debate4.6
21142,114 ratings
To prevent the collapse of the global financial system in 2008, The Treasury committed 245 billion in taxpayer dollars to stabilize America’s banking institutions. Today, banks that were once “too big to fail” have only grown bigger. Were size and complexity at the root of the financial crisis, or do calls to break up the big banks ignore real benefits that only economies of scale can pass on to customers and investors? The debaters are Richard Fisher, Simon Johnson, Douglas Elliott, and Paul Salzman.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

32,263 Listeners

30,678 Listeners

43,532 Listeners

5,132 Listeners

10,695 Listeners

778 Listeners

26,397 Listeners

4,294 Listeners

2,468 Listeners

1,113 Listeners

2,370 Listeners

7,292 Listeners

16,489 Listeners

35 Listeners

16,366 Listeners