Arts

Books

Fashion & Beauty

Performing Arts

Food

Visual Arts

Design

Business

Entrepreneurship

Investing

Marketing

Careers

Management

Non-Profit

Comedy

Stand-Up

Comedy Interviews

Improv

Education

Self-Improvement

How To

Courses

Language Learning

Fiction

Comedy Fiction

Drama

Science Fiction

Government

Health & Fitness

Medicine

Alternative Health

Nutrition

Mental Health

Fitness

Sexuality

History

Kids & Family

Parenting

Stories for Kids

Education for Kids

Pets & Animals

Leisure

Video Games

Games

Automotive

Animation & Manga

Hobbies

Aviation

Home & Garden

Crafts

Music

Music Commentary

Music Interviews

Music History

News

Sports News

Entertainment News

News Commentary

Politics

Daily News

Business News

Tech News

Religion & Spirituality

Christianity

Spirituality

Religion

Judaism

Islam

Buddhism

Hinduism

Science

Social Sciences

Life Sciences

Natural Sciences

Nature

Chemistry

Mathematics

Earth Sciences

Physics

Astronomy

Society & Culture

Documentary

Relationships

Philosophy

Personal Journals

Places & Travel

Sports

Golf

Soccer

Wrestling

Basketball

Football

Fantasy Sports

Baseball

Wilderness

Running

Hockey

Rugby

Cricket

Volleyball

Tennis

Swimming

Technology

True Crime

TV & Film

Film Interviews

TV Reviews

After Shows

Film Reviews

Film History

David Nessles och jacob Stålhammars yttre monolog

Huvudnyheterna

听凭自己被步履匆匆的城市视而不见

海辛

01.07.2017
ZKM_Lecture Hall

As part of the exhibition »Radical Software. The Raindance Foundation, Media Ecology and Video Art«, the ZKM is hosting the »Raindance. Research and Development in Video Art and Media Ecology« Symposium on Saturday 1 July 2017. It will reunite the former members of the Raindance Foundation – video artists Frank Gillette, Beryl Korot and Ira Schneider as well as Hollywood producer Michael Shamberg – for the first time in a joint discussion group and will present lectures by renowned media theoreticians and scholars. The symposium will be moderated by Davidson Gigliotti.
In the early 1970s, the »Raindance Foundation« established itself as a pioneering protagonist of radical media critique and the promoter of a new democracy in the era of electronic mass media. Through theoretical and practical, experimental investigations of the medium of video, the aim was to create the prerequisites for individual self-determination and the construction of a democratic community. 
Inspired by theoreticians such as Gregory Bateson, »Raindance« developed the concept of a »Media Ecology«, a model for the description of the environment as an information-processing system, in which technical, social, psychological and aesthetic aspects are finally able to be handled as a whole. The »Radical Software« journal founded by Raindance in 1970 anticipated the future of the internet society with the words, »power is no longer measured in land, work or capital, but by access to information and the means to distribute it«. According to the claim, other social systems and individual lifestyles could only be developed by establishing alternative, decentralized information structures. 
Not least due to confronting workable models and methods to analyze and design an environment that is characterised by electronic communication media, these theses and experiments of the »Raindance Foundation« have a topical relevance for the current technological developments and accompanying social challenges, such as the relationship of social media and democracy, security, monitoring and individual freedom. 
Program
11 am–11:10 am
Welcoming Speech Peter Weibel
11:10 am–11:20 am 
Introductory Speech Margit Rosen and Judith Bihr
11:20 am–11:30 am
A Brief History of »Raindance« George Barker 
1:30 am–12:15 am
Artistic Research. Interactive social experiments in art and science Elisabeth Fritz (University of Jena) 
12:15–12:30 pm 
Coffee break 
12:30 pm–1:30 pm
Exhibition tour 
1:30 pm–2:30 pm
Lunch Break 
2:30 pm–3:45 pm
All Hail the Cybernation?— archiving and organizing with cameras and ANTS
Elizabeth Coffman (Loyola University Chicago)Ted Hardin (Columbia College Chicago)
4pm – 5:30 Uhr
Discussion Panel
Former Members of the Raindance Foundation 
Frank Gillette, Beryl Korot, Ira Schneider, Michael Shamberg (via Skype)
Moderation: Davidson Gigliotti
5:30 pm–6pm 
Concluding Remarks George Barker, Judith Bihr, Margit Rosen
 
Organization / Institution
ZKM | Center for Art and Media

///

01.07.2017
ZKM_Vortragssaal

Im Rahmen der Ausstellung veranstaltet das ZKM am Samstag, 1. Juli 2017 das Symposium »Raindance. Research and Development in Video Art and Media Ecology«, das die ehemaligen Mitglieder der Raindance Foundation – die Videokünstler Frank Gillette, Beryl Korot und Ira Schneider sowie den Hollywoodproduzenten Michael Shamberg – erstmals wieder in einer gemeinsamen Diskussionsgruppe, moderiert von Davidson Gigliotti, vereint und Vorträge renommierter MedientheoretierInnen und WissenschaftlerInnen präsentiert.
In den frühen 1970er-Jahren etablierte sich die »Raindance Foundation« als wegweisender Akteur einer radikalen Medienkritik und Promoter einer neuen Demokratie im Zeitalter elektronischer Massenmedien. Durch theoretische und praktisch-experimentelle Untersuchungen des Mediums Video sollten die Voraussetzungen für individuelle Selbstbestimmung und die Gestaltung eines demokratischen Gemeinwesens geschaffen werden. 
Inspiriert von Theoretikern wie Gregory Bateson entwickelte Raindance die Vorstellung einer »Medien-Ökologie«, ein Modell für die Beschreibung der Umwelt als informationsprozessierendes System, in dem technische, soziale, psychologische und ästhetische Aspekte nicht mehr getrennt behandelt werden können. Die von Raindance 1970 gegründete Zeitschrift »Radical Software« antizipierte die Zukunft der Internet-Gesellschaft mit den Worten: »Macht wird nicht mehr in Land, Arbeit oder Kapital gemessen, sondern durch den Zugang zu Informationen und die Mittel zur Verbreitung«. Nur durch die Etablierung alternativer, dezentraler Informationsstrukturen, so die Forderung, könnten andere gesellschaftliche Systeme und individuelle Lebensstile entstehen. 
Nicht zuletzt durch die Auseinandersetzung um tragfähige Modelle und Methoden zur Analyse und Gestaltung einer von elektronischen Kommunikationsmedien geprägten Umwelt haben die Thesen und Experimente der »Raindance Foundation« eine aktuelle Relevanz für die gegenwärtigen technologischen Entwicklungen und die damit einhergehenden gesellschaftlichen Herausforderungen, wie das Verhältnis von sozialen Medien und Demokratie, Sicherheit, Überwachung und individueller Freiheit. 
Bitte beachten Sie: Die Konferenzsprache ist Englisch. 
 
Programm
11:00–11:10 Uhr
Peter Weibel
Welcoming speech
11:10–11:20 Uhr 
Margit Rosen, Judith Bihr
Introduction
11:20–11:30 Uhr
George Barker 
A Brief History of »Raindance«
11.30–12:15 Uhr
Elisabeth Fritz 
(University of Jena) 
Artistic Research. Interactive Social Experiments in Art and Science 
12:15–12:30 Uhr 
Coffee break 
 
12:00–13:00 Uhr 
Exhibition Tour
 
13:30–14:30 Uhr 
Lunch Break 
 
14:30–15:45 Uhr
Elizabeth Coffman
(Loyola University Chicago)
Ted Hardin 
(Columbia College Chicago)
All Hail the Cybernation?— archiving and organizing with cameras and ANTS
 
16:00 – 17:30 Uhr
Frank Gillette, Beryl Korot, Ira Schneider, Michael Shamberg (via Skype)
Discussion Panel
Former Members of the Raindance Foundation 
Moderation: Davidson Gigliotti
17:30–18:00 Uhr 
George Barker, Judith Bihr, Margit Rosen
Concluding remarks 
 
Organisation / Institution
ZKM | Karlsruhe

01.07.2017 ZKM_Lecture Hall As part of the exhibition »Radical Software. The Raindance Foundation, Media Ecology and Video Art«, the ZKM is hosting the »Raindance. Research and Development in Video Art and Media Ecology« Symposium on Saturday 1 July 2017. It will reunite the former members of the Raindance Foundation – video artists Frank Gillette, Beryl Korot and Ira Schneider as well as Hollywood producer Michael Shamberg – for the first time in a joint discussion group and will present lectures by renowned media theoreticians and scholars. The symposium will be moderated by Davidson Gigliotti. In the early 1970s, the »Raindance Foundation« established itself as a pioneering protagonist of radical media critique and the promoter of a new democracy in the era of electronic mass media. Through theoretical and practical, experimental investigations of the medium of video, the aim was to create the prerequisites for individual self-determination and the construction of a democratic community. Inspired by theoreticians such as Gregory Bateson, »Raindance« developed the concept of a »Media Ecology«, a model for the description of the environment as an information-processing system, in which technical, social, psychological and aesthetic aspects are finally able to be handled as a whole. The »Radical Software« journal founded by Raindance in 1970 anticipated the future of the internet society with the words, »power is no longer measured in land, work or capital, but by access to information and the means to distribute it«. According to the claim, other social systems and individual lifestyles could only be developed by establishing alternative, decentralized information structures. Not least due to confronting workable models and methods to analyze and design an environment that is characterised by electronic communication media, these theses and experiments of the »Raindance Foundation« have a topical relevance for the current technological developments and accompanying social challenges, such as the relationship of social media and democracy, security, monitoring and individual freedom. Program 11 am–11:10 am Welcoming Speech Peter Weibel 11:10 am–11:20 am Introductory Speech Margit Rosen and Judith Bihr 11:20 am–11:30 am A Brief History of »Raindance« George Barker 1:30 am–12:15 am Artistic Research. Interactive social experiments in art and science Elisabeth Fritz (University of Jena) 12:15–12:30 pm Coffee break 12:30 pm–1:30 pm Exhibition tour 1:30 pm–2:30 pm Lunch Break 2:30 pm–3:45 pm All Hail the Cybernation?— archiving and organizing with cameras and ANTS Elizabeth Coffman (Loyola University Chicago)Ted Hardin (Columbia College Chicago) 4pm – 5:30 Uhr Discussion Panel Former Members of the Raindance Foundation Frank Gillette, Beryl Korot, Ira Schneider, Michael Shamberg (via Skype) Moderation: Davidson Gigliotti 5:30 pm–6pm Concluding Remarks George Barker, Judith Bihr, Margit Rosen Organization / Institution ZKM | Center for Art and Media /// 01.07.2017 ZKM_Vortragssaal Im Rahmen der Ausstellung veranstaltet das ZKM am Samstag, 1. Juli 2017 das Symposium »Raindance. Research and Development in Video Art and Media Ecology«, das die ehemaligen Mitglieder der Raindance Foundation – die Videokünstler Frank Gillette, Beryl Korot und Ira Schneider sowie den Hollywoodproduzenten Michael Shamberg – erstmals wieder in einer gemeinsamen Diskussionsgruppe, moderiert von Davidson Gigliotti, vereint und Vorträge renommierter MedientheoretierInnen und WissenschaftlerInnen präsentiert. In den frühen 1970er-Jahren etablierte sich die »Raindance Foundation« als wegweisender Akteur einer radikalen Medienkritik und Promoter einer neuen Demokratie im Zeitalter elektronischer Massenmedien. Durch theoretische und praktisch-experimentelle Untersuchungen des Mediums Video sollten die Voraussetzungen für individuelle Selbstbestimmung und die Gestaltung eines demokratischen Gemeinwesens geschaffen werden. Inspiriert von Theoretikern wie Gregory Bateson entwickelte Raindance die Vorstellung einer »Medien-Ökologie«, ein Modell für die Beschreibung der Umwelt als informationsprozessierendes System, in dem technische, soziale, psychologische und ästhetische Aspekte nicht mehr getrennt behandelt werden können. Die von Raindance 1970 gegründete Zeitschrift »Radical Software« antizipierte die Zukunft der Internet-Gesellschaft mit den Worten: »Macht wird nicht mehr in Land, Arbeit oder Kapital gemessen, sondern durch den Zugang zu Informationen und die Mittel zur Verbreitung«. Nur durch die Etablierung alternativer, dezentraler Informationsstrukturen, so die Forderung, könnten andere gesellschaftliche Systeme und individuelle Lebensstile entstehen. Nicht zuletzt durch die Auseinandersetzung um tragfähige Modelle und Methoden zur Analyse und Gestaltung einer von elektronischen Kommunikationsmedien geprägten Umwelt haben die Thesen und Experimente der »Raindance Foundation« eine aktuelle Relevanz für die gegenwärtigen technologischen Entwicklungen und die damit einhergehenden gesellschaftlichen Herausforderungen, wie das Verhältnis von sozialen Medien und Demokratie, Sicherheit, Überwachung und individueller Freiheit. Bitte beachten Sie: Die Konferenzsprache ist Englisch. Programm 11:00–11:10 Uhr Peter Weibel Welcoming speech 11:10–11:20 Uhr Margit Rosen, Judith Bihr Introduction 11:20–11:30 Uhr George Barker A Brief History of »Raindance« 11.30–12:15 Uhr Elisabeth Fritz (University of Jena) Artistic Research. Interactive Social Experiments in Art and Science 12:15–12:30 Uhr Coffee break 12:00–13:00 Uhr Exhibition Tour 13:30–14:30 Uhr Lunch Break 14:30–15:45 Uhr Elizabeth Coffman (Loyola University Chicago) Ted Hardin (Columbia College Chicago) All Hail the Cybernation?— archiving and organizing with cameras and ANTS 16:00 – 17:30 Uhr Frank Gillette, Beryl Korot, Ira Schneider, Michael Shamberg (via Skype) Discussion Panel Former Members of the Raindance Foundation Moderation: Davidson Gigliotti 17:30–18:00 Uhr George Barker, Judith Bihr, Margit Rosen Concluding remarks Organisation / Institution ZKM | Karlsruhe

01.07.2017
ZKM_Lecture Hall

As part of the exhibition »Radical Software. The Raindance Foundation, Media Ecology and Video Art«,&nbsp;the ZKM is hosting the »Raindance. Research and Development in Video Art and Media Ecology« Symposium on&nbsp;Saturday 1 July 2017. It will reunite the former members of the Raindance Foundation – video artists Frank Gillette, Beryl Korot and Ira Schneider as well as Hollywood producer Michael Shamberg – for the first time in a joint discussion group and will present lectures by renowned media theoreticians and scholars. The symposium will be moderated by Davidson Gigliotti.
In the early 1970s, the »Raindance Foundation« established itself as a pioneering protagonist of radical media critique and the promoter of a new democracy in the era of electronic mass media. Through theoretical and practical, experimental investigations of the medium of video, the aim was to create the prerequisites for individual self-determination and the construction of a democratic community.&nbsp;
Inspired by theoreticians such as Gregory Bateson, »Raindance« developed the concept of a »Media Ecology«, a model for the description of the environment as an information-processing system, in which technical, social, psychological and aesthetic aspects are finally able to be handled as a whole. The »Radical Software« journal founded by Raindance in 1970 anticipated the future of the internet society with the words, »power is no longer measured in land, work or capital, but by access to information and the means to distribute it«. According to the claim, other social systems and individual lifestyles could only be developed by establishing alternative, decentralized information structures.&nbsp;
Not least due to confronting workable models and methods to analyze and design an environment that is characterised by electronic communication media, these theses and experiments of the »Raindance Foundation« have a topical relevance for the current technological developments and accompanying social challenges, such as the relationship of social media and democracy, security, monitoring and individual freedom.&nbsp;
Program
11 am–11:10 am
Welcoming Speech Peter Weibel
11:10 am–11:20 am&nbsp;
Introductory Speech Margit Rosen and Judith Bihr
11:20 am–11:30 am
A Brief History of »Raindance« George Barker&nbsp;
1:30&nbsp;am–12:15 am
Artistic Research. Interactive social experiments in art and science&nbsp;Elisabeth Fritz (University of Jena)&nbsp;
12:15–12:30 pm&nbsp;
Coffee&nbsp;break&nbsp;
12:30 pm–1:30 pm
Exhibition tour&nbsp;
1:30 pm–2:30 pm
Lunch Break&nbsp;
2:30 pm–3:45 pm
All Hail the Cybernation?— archiving and organizing with cameras and ANTS
Elizabeth Coffman (Loyola University Chicago)Ted Hardin (Columbia College Chicago)
4pm – 5:30 Uhr
Discussion Panel
Former Members of the Raindance Foundation&nbsp;
Frank Gillette, Beryl Korot, Ira Schneider, Michael Shamberg (via Skype)
Moderation: Davidson Gigliotti
5:30 pm–6pm&nbsp;
Concluding Remarks&nbsp;George Barker, Judith Bihr, Margit Rosen
&nbsp;
Organization / Institution
ZKM | Center for Art and Media

///

01.07.2017
ZKM_Vortragssaal

Im Rahmen der Ausstellung veranstaltet das ZKM am Samstag, 1. Juli 2017 das Symposium »Raindance. Research and Development in Video Art and Media Ecology«, das die ehemaligen Mitglieder der Raindance Foundation – die Videokünstler Frank Gillette, Beryl Korot und Ira Schneider sowie den Hollywoodproduzenten Michael Shamberg – erstmals wieder in einer gemeinsamen Diskussionsgruppe, moderiert von Davidson Gigliotti, vereint und Vorträge renommierter MedientheoretierInnen und WissenschaftlerInnen präsentiert.
In den frühen 1970er-Jahren etablierte sich die »Raindance Foundation«&nbsp;als wegweisender Akteur einer radikalen Medienkritik und Promoter einer neuen Demokratie im Zeitalter elektronischer Massenmedien. Durch theoretische und praktisch-experimentelle Untersuchungen des Mediums Video sollten die Voraussetzungen für individuelle Selbstbestimmung und die Gestaltung eines demokratischen Gemeinwesens geschaffen werden.&nbsp;
Inspiriert von Theoretikern wie Gregory Bateson entwickelte Raindance die Vorstellung einer »Medien-Ökologie«, ein Modell für die Beschreibung der Umwelt als informationsprozessierendes System, in dem technische, soziale, psychologische und ästhetische Aspekte nicht mehr getrennt behandelt werden können. Die von Raindance 1970 gegründete Zeitschrift »Radical Software« antizipierte die Zukunft der Internet-Gesellschaft mit den Worten: »Macht wird nicht mehr in Land, Arbeit oder Kapital gemessen, sondern durch den Zugang zu Informationen und die Mittel zur Verbreitung«. Nur durch die Etablierung alternativer, dezentraler Informationsstrukturen, so die Forderung, könnten andere gesellschaftliche Systeme und individuelle Lebensstile entstehen.&nbsp;
Nicht zuletzt durch die Auseinandersetzung um tragfähige Modelle und Methoden zur Analyse und Gestaltung einer von elektronischen Kommunikationsmedien geprägten Umwelt haben die Thesen und Experimente der »Raindance Foundation« eine aktuelle Relevanz für die gegenwärtigen technologischen Entwicklungen und die damit einhergehenden gesellschaftlichen Herausforderungen, wie das Verhältnis von sozialen Medien und Demokratie, Sicherheit, Überwachung und individueller Freiheit.&nbsp;
Bitte beachten Sie: Die Konferenzsprache ist Englisch.&nbsp;
&nbsp;
Programm
11:00–11:10 Uhr
Peter Weibel
Welcoming speech
11:10–11:20 Uhr&nbsp;
Margit Rosen, Judith Bihr
Introduction
11:20–11:30&nbsp;Uhr
George Barker&nbsp;
A Brief History of »Raindance«
11.30–12:15 Uhr
Elisabeth Fritz 
(University of Jena)&nbsp;
Artistic Research. Interactive Social Experiments in Art and Science&nbsp;
12:15–12:30 Uhr&nbsp;
Coffee&nbsp;break&nbsp;
&nbsp;
12:00–13:00 Uhr&nbsp;
Exhibition Tour
&nbsp;
13:30–14:30 Uhr&nbsp;
Lunch Break&nbsp;
&nbsp;
14:30–15:45 Uhr
Elizabeth Coffman
(Loyola University Chicago)
Ted Hardin 
(Columbia College Chicago)
All Hail the Cybernation?— archiving and organizing with cameras and ANTS
&nbsp;
16:00 – 17:30 Uhr
Frank Gillette, Beryl Korot, Ira Schneider, Michael Shamberg (via Skype)
Discussion Panel
Former Members of the Raindance Foundation&nbsp;
Moderation: Davidson Gigliotti
17:30–18:00 Uhr&nbsp;
George Barker, Judith Bihr, Margit Rosen
Concluding remarks&nbsp;
&nbsp;
Organisation / Institution
ZKM | Karlsruhe

Raindance. Research and Development in Video Art and Media Ecology

Empowerista

Diálogo com a leitura do Capítulo 11 .
Páginas 151-160

Diálogo com a leitura do Capítulo 11 . Páginas 151-160

UM NOVO FAST FOOD PARA VOCÊ:O MUNDO DO TRABALHO E A EDUCAÇÃO

The Leader’s Kitbag is a practical podcast for busy and aspiring leaders, hosted by leadership expert Ben Morton.

Each episode is packed with tools, tips and tactics you can use immediately. In 5–10 minutes, you’ll get a clear insight, a simple framework or prompt, and a nudge to put it into practice.

If you want actionable tools and a clearer path to leadership success, this is your kitbag for the journey.

The Leader’s Kitbag is a practical podcast for busy and aspiring leaders, hosted by leadership expert Ben Morton. Each episode is packed with tools, tips and tactics you can use immediately. In 5–10 minutes, you’ll get a clear insight, a simple framework or prompt, and a nudge to put it into practice. If you want actionable tools and a clearer path to leadership success, this is your kitbag for the journey.

The Leader's Kitbag

Tratamos de temas do dia a dia, da administração, organização, queixas da vida, explicações, conversas...

O Podcast, O Conceito

What does the word 'community' mean to you? An homogenous group of people united by faith, sexuality or another form of identity? Or perhaps it's about the place where you grew up, or the people you work with? 
 
Recovering Community is a podcast series from the University of Glasgow's School of Political and Social Sciences about community; what it means, how it's formed and how it is rebuilt.
 
Les Back is joined by academics, campaigners, volunteers and artists to talk about how communities respond to social and economic change, who belongs and who is excluded and what this tells us about some of our most pressing social issues.

What does the word 'community' mean to you? An homogenous group of people united by faith, sexuality or another form of identity? Or perhaps it's about the place where you grew up, or the people you work with? Recovering Community is a podcast series from the University of Glasgow's School of Political and Social Sciences about community; what it means, how it's formed and how it is rebuilt. Les Back is joined by academics, campaigners, volunteers and artists to talk about how communities respond to social and economic change, who belongs and who is excluded and what this tells us about some of our most pressing social issues.

Recovering Community

Programa voltado à crítica da imprensa capitalista. As mentiras e falsificações, os métodos de manipulação, as omissões deliberadas — tudo isso é analisado minuciosamente, e de maneira demolidora, pela Não Compre Jornais, Minta Você Mesmo

Não Compre Jornais, Minta Você Mesmo

《法治的细节》是中国政法大学法学教授罗翔全新的法学随笔，面向大众读者，从热点案件解读、法学理念科普、经典名著讲解等6大板块，普及法律常识与法治观念。内容包括辛普森案、电车难题、性同意制度等法律基本常识，或N号房、张玉环案等时事热点的案件，多维度培育法律思维，助力法治社会的构建，点亮每个人心中的法治之光。此外，本书还收录了罗翔在爆红后的心路历程，分享其求学成长经历，袒露其心境的变化与成熟，与读者一起通过阅读与思辨，走出生活中的迷茫时刻，在现实中共同完善法治的细节。

《法治的细节》是中国政法大学法学教授罗翔全新的法学随笔，面向大众读者，从热点案件解读、法学理念科普、经典名著讲解等6大板块，普及法律常识与法治观念。内容包括辛普森案、电车难题、性同意制度等法律基本常识，或N号房、张玉环案等时事热点的案件，多维度培育法律思维，助力法治社会的构建，点亮每个人心中的法治之光。此外，本书还收录了罗翔在爆红后的心路历程，分享其求学成长经历，袒露其心境的变化与成熟，与读者一起通过阅读与思辨，走出生活中的迷茫时刻，在现实中共同完善法治的细节。

《法治的细节》是中国政法大学法学教授罗翔全新的法学随笔，面向大众读者，从热点案件解读、法学理念科普、经典名著讲解等6大板块，普及法律常识与法治观念。内容包括辛普森案、电车难题、性同意制度等法律基本常识，或N号房、张玉环案等时事热点的案件，多维度培育法律思维，助力法治社会的构建，点亮每个人心中的法治之光。此外，本书还收录了罗翔在爆红后的心路历程，分享其求学成长经历，袒露其心境的变化与成熟，与读者一起通过阅读与思辨，走出生活中的迷茫时刻，在现实中共同完善法治的细节。

法治的细节 政法大学教授罗翔

<blockquote style="font-size:14px;margin:10px 0px;color:rgb(102, 102, 102);border-left:5px solid rgb(232, 232, 232);padding-left:15px;">关注主播，免费获取音频文稿及配套思维导图！</blockquote><hr style="border:0px;margin:20px 0px;background:#ddd;display:inline-block;width:100%;border-style:solid;height:1px;" />涵盖《普通心理学》所有的重点内容本专辑参考了国内多本心理学入门教材，梳理覆盖全部教材的知识点。紧扣《普通心理学》最新版教材浓缩讲解参考彭聃龄老师普通心理学第五版、心理学导论、心理学与生活等多本书籍考研党福音、心理学小白入门最佳选择专辑包涵心理学考研最常涉及的重点、难点知识，贴近最新的考研大纲获取音频文稿及配套思维导图请私信。 <img data-key="0" src="http://imagev2.xmcdn.com/storages/0fd3-audiofreehighqps/5D/35/GKwRIDoFoutmAAFIBQEIWhKB.png!op_type=4&device_type=ios&upload_type=attachment&name=mobile_large" alt="" data-origin="http://imagev2.xmcdn.com/storages/0fd3-audiofreehighqps/5D/35/GKwRIDoFoutmAAFIBQEIWhKB.png?op_type=0" data-large="http://imagev2.xmcdn.com/storages/0fd3-audiofreehighqps/5D/35/GKwRIDoFoutmAAFIBQEIWhKB.png!op_type=4&device_type=ios&upload_type=attachment&name=mobile_large" data-large-width="750" data-large-height="348" data-preview="http://imagev2.xmcdn.com/storages/0fd3-audiofreehighqps/5D/35/GKwRIDoFoutmAAFIBQEIWhKB.png!op_type=4&device_type=ios&upload_type=attachment&name=mobile_large" data-preview-width="140" data-preview-height="64" /> <img data-key="1" src="http://imagev2.xmcdn.com/storages/6c63-audiofreehighqps/68/A7/GMCoOSUFout0AAEY1AEIWhWE.png!op_type=4&device_type=ios&upload_type=attachment&name=mobile_large" alt="" data-origin="http://imagev2.xmcdn.com/storages/6c63-audiofreehighqps/68/A7/GMCoOSUFout0AAEY1AEIWhWE.png?op_type=0" data-large="http://imagev2.xmcdn.com/storages/6c63-audiofreehighqps/68/A7/GMCoOSUFout0AAEY1AEIWhWE.png!op_type=4&device_type=ios&upload_type=attachment&name=mobile_large" data-large-width="750" data-large-height="445" data-preview="http://imagev2.xmcdn.com/storages/6c63-audiofreehighqps/68/A7/GMCoOSUFout0AAEY1AEIWhWE.png!op_type=4&device_type=ios&upload_type=attachment&name=mobile_large" data-preview-width="140" data-preview-height="83" />

关注主播，免费获取音频文稿及配套思维导图！涵盖《普通心理学》所有的重点内容本专辑参考了国内多本心理学入门教材，梳理覆盖全部教材的知识点。紧扣《普通心理学》最新版教材浓缩讲解参考彭聃龄老师普通心理学第五版、心理学导论、心理学与生活等多本书籍考研党福音、心理学小白入门最佳选择专辑包涵心理学考研最常涉及的重点、难点知识，贴近最新的考研大纲获取音频文稿及配套思维导图请私信。

关注主播，免费获取音频文稿及配套思维导图！涵盖《普通心理学》所有的重点内容本专辑参考了国内多本心理学入门教材，梳理覆盖全部教材的知识点。紧扣《普通心理学》最新版教材浓缩讲解参考彭聃龄老师普通心理学第五版、心理学导论、心理学与生活等多本书籍考研党福音、心理学小白入门最佳选择专辑包涵心理学考研最常涉及的重点、难点知识，贴近最新的考研大纲获取音频文稿及配套思维导图请私信。

普通心理学|每天6分钟学点心理学

The Scientista Podcast spotlights women (and allies!) reshaping business, politics, and culture. Hosted by behavioral scientist Dr. Sweta Chakraborty and former Assistant Secretary of State Monica Medina, this show brings you candid conversations with changemakers and thought leaders from around the world. Subscribe for behind-the-scenes stories of how some of today’s most inspiring leaders have faced challenges, made tough calls, and turned vision into real-world impact.

The Scientista Podcast spotlights women (and allies!) reshaping business, politics, and culture. Hosted by behavioral scientist Dr. Sweta Chakraborty and former Assistant Secretary of State Monica Medina, this show brings you candid conversations with changemakers and thought leaders from around the world. Subscribe for behind-the-scenes stories of how some of today’s most inspiring leaders have faced challenges, made tough calls, and turned vision into real-world impact.

Scientista

En podd om hästars kraft och människors psykiska hälsa. <hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

En podd om hästars kraft och människors psykiska hälsa. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

En podd om hästars kraft och människors psykiska hälsa. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Hästkraft

A podcast for discussion and debate on the political economy of capitalism, imperialism, and socialism in the Americas. For more than forty years Latin American Perspectives has served as the leading academic journal in Latin American Studies, publishing timely, progressive analyses of the social forces shaping contemporary Latin America. We currently produce two podcasts: Latin American Perspectives & Editors' Choice: Latin American Perspectives' Book Conversations.

Latin American Perspectives features interviews with LAP issue editors, academics, and activists where participants discuss current research, political-economic issues, and social movements in Latin America. The podcast is hosted by sociologist and LAP coordinating editor Alexander Scott. 

Editors' Choice features interviews with authors of exciting new books in the fields of Latin American and Latino studies. The series is intended to share critical educational resources and information on a variety of topics and issues in Latin America and provide detailed and in-depth political and theoretical analysis of the texts covered. Editors Choice is hosted by LAP coordinating editors Alexander Scott and Tomas Crowder-Taraborrelli.

A podcast for discussion and debate on the political economy of capitalism, imperialism, and socialism in the Americas. For more than forty years Latin American Perspectives has served as the leading academic journal in Latin American Studies, publishing timely, progressive analyses of the social forces shaping contemporary Latin America. We currently produce two podcasts: Latin American Perspectives & Editors' Choice: Latin American Perspectives' Book Conversations. Latin American Perspectives features interviews with LAP issue editors, academics, and activists where participants discuss current research, political-economic issues, and social movements in Latin America. The podcast is hosted by sociologist and LAP coordinating editor Alexander Scott. Editors' Choice features interviews with authors of exciting new books in the fields of Latin American and Latino studies. The series is intended to share critical educational resources and information on a variety of topics and issues in Latin America and provide detailed and in-depth political and theoretical analysis of the texts covered. Editors Choice is hosted by LAP coordinating editors Alexander Scott and Tomas Crowder-Taraborrelli.

A podcast for discussion and debate on the political economy of capitalism, imperialism, and socialism in the Americas. For more than forty years Latin American Perspectives has served as the leading academic journal in Latin American Studies, publishing timely, progressive analyses of the social forces shaping contemporary Latin America. We currently produce two podcasts: Latin American Perspectives &amp; Editors' Choice: Latin American Perspectives' Book Conversations.

Latin American Perspectives features interviews with LAP issue editors, academics, and activists where participants discuss current research, political-economic issues, and social movements in Latin America. The podcast is hosted by sociologist and LAP coordinating editor Alexander Scott. 

Editors' Choice features interviews with authors of exciting new books in the fields of Latin American and Latino studies. The series is intended to share critical educational resources and information on a variety of topics and issues in Latin America and provide detailed and in-depth political and theoretical analysis of the texts covered. Editors Choice is hosted by LAP coordinating editors Alexander Scott and Tomas Crowder-Taraborrelli.

Latin American Perspectives

Interviews from the Emmy award winning documentary - Liberty &amp; Slavery: The Paradox of America's Founding Fathers.

Interviews from the Emmy award winning documentary - Liberty & Slavery: The Paradox of America's Founding Fathers.

The Liberty & Slavery Podcast

El sistema legal se encuentra en constante evolución. Sus implicaciones son siempre relevantes y muchas veces trascendentales, ya que impactan a todos los niveles y sectores de la sociedad. 

En Santamarina + Steta, la firma legal full service por excelencia en México, construimos este canal para digerir los temas que están redefiniendo el Estado de Derecho en el país.

Nuestros especialistas ofrecen una perspectiva fresca, novedosa e innovadora para que los líderes que dan forma al presente y futuro de México tomen decisiones con conocimiento de causa.

El sistema legal se encuentra en constante evolución. Sus implicaciones son siempre relevantes y muchas veces trascendentales, ya que impactan a todos los niveles y sectores de la sociedad. En Santamarina + Steta, la firma legal full service por excelencia en México, construimos este canal para digerir los temas que están redefiniendo el Estado de Derecho en el país. Nuestros especialistas ofrecen una perspectiva fresca, novedosa e innovadora para que los líderes que dan forma al presente y futuro de México tomen decisiones con conocimiento de causa.

Evolución Legal

Technology Archives - C. G. Jung Institute of Chicago

يناقش هذا البودكاست الفكر الاقتصادي النسوي وأهميته في منطقتنا، لمواجهة تأثير السياسات النيوليبرالية والاستعمار، ومعالجة أوجه اللامساواة النظامية والبنيوية، وتعزيز اقتصادات عادلة ومستدامة وشاملة

Austerity Radio | راديو التقشف

Official India channel for What If An epic exploration of possibilities. What If: These two simple words are the spark that has ignited countless theories, discoveries, and inventions. Most of what we know about ourselves and the universe is because someone, somewhere, at some time asked themselves “What if?” Join us on an imaginary adventure — grounded in scientific theory — through time, space and chance, as we ask what if some of the most fundamental aspects of our existence were different. What If is a documentary web series that takes you on an epic journey through hypothetical worlds and possibilities, some in distant corners of the universe, others right here on Earth. #WhatIfIndia What If is produced by Underknown in Toronto, Canada and made possible with the support of Ontario Creates.

क्या हो अगर - What If India

Underground History connects culture, history, and place in Southern Oregon and beyond. The program is a collaboration with the Southern Oregon University Laboratory of Anthropology and is hosted by historical archaeologist and research faculty member Chelsea Rose._______________________________________________________________________________Subscribe to access all episodes:

Underground History

Podcast Na rozcestí zve sociální vědce a vědkyně, kteří se ve svém výzkumu věnují zásadním tématům současného globalizovaného světa. Na rozcestí vzniká ve spolupráci Alarmu s výzkumným programem Globální konflikty a lokální souvislosti, který je financován v rámci Strategie AV21 Akademie věd ČR.

Na rozcestí

Sociologipodden förklarar samhällsfenomen genom aktuell forskning. Varje avsnitt innehåller en intervju med inbjuden gäst och litteraturtips. Programledare är Åsa Wettergren och Håkan Thörn som båda är professorer i sociologi vid institutionen för sociologi och arbetsvetenskap, Göteborgs universitet.

Sociologipodden

“Talk On — Debates in Anthropology” is a monthly podcast of the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology in Halle (Saale), Germany. 
In each episode of this podcast, one of our two hosts, Christoph Brumann or Jovan Maud, talks to the guest about their publications, research, and current debates in the field of social anthropology.

“Talk On — Debates in Anthropology” is a monthly podcast of the Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology in Halle (Saale), Germany. In each episode of this podcast, one of our two hosts, Christoph Brumann or Jovan Maud, talks to the guest about their publications, research, and current debates in the field of social anthropology.

Talk On — Debates in Anthropology

Hi and welcome to Conversations to Connect. I’m Fenella Phoebe and on this podcast we will be hosting conversations on the topic of loneliness, community and connection to share&nbsp;insights, research and knowledge to inspire change and help people feel more connected.&nbsp; Music:Composed, performed and produced by Athena Octavia.https://www.athenaoctavia.comhttps://www.instagram.com/athenaoctavia/?hl=en Follow:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fenellaphoebe<hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Hi and welcome to Conversations to Connect. I’m Fenella Phoebe and on this podcast we will be hosting conversations on the topic of loneliness, community and connection to share insights, research and knowledge to inspire change and help people feel more connected.  Music: Composed, performed and produced by Athena Octavia. https://www.athenaoctavia.com https://www.instagram.com/athenaoctavia/?hl=en Follow: Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fenellaphoebe Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hi and welcome to Conversations to Connect. I’m Fenella Phoebe and on this podcast we will be hosting conversations on the topic of loneliness, community and connection to share&nbsp;insights, research and knowledge to inspire change and help people feel more connected.&nbsp; Music:Composed, performed and produced by Athena Octavia.https://www.athenaoctavia.comhttps://www.instagram.com/athenaoctavia/?hl=en Follow:Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/fenellaphoebe Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Conversations to Connect

Aktuális közéleti, kulturális és társadalmi témákról beszélget meghívott vendégeivel Ungár Péter

Ungár Péter Podcast

三截棍，係中國嘅傳統兵器。三截相連，攻守兼備，互補不足。三棍，三條友吹水三節，講笑自娛，一氣呵成，題材包攬電影、書籍、音樂、文化、藝術。。。非專業學術討論，請多多指教～ 逢週末更新。

三截棍，係中國嘅傳統兵器。三截相連，攻守兼備，互補不足。三棍，三條友吹水三節，講笑自娛，一氣呵成，題材包攬電影、書籍、音樂、文化、藝術。。。非專業學術討論，請多多指教～逢週末更新。

三截棍，係中國嘅傳統兵器。三截相連，攻守兼備，互補不足。三棍，三條友吹水三節，講笑自娛，一氣呵成，題材包攬電影、書籍、音樂、文化、藝術。。。非專業學術討論，請多多指教～ 逢週末更新。

三節棍

Real conversations with real individuals with a vested interest in living life well and in alignment with their values. With a sprinkle of some behavior change motivation along the way!

Imagine Wellness: Real Talk With Behavior Change Baddies

In elke lagere schoolklas zitten minstens drie kinderen die ingrijpende gebeurtenissen meemaken of hebben meegemaakt. Nog al te vaak worden deze traumatische ervaringen niet gezien en herkend. Terwijl het een grote impact heeft op deze kinderen en hun verdere leven. In deze podcast gaat Veerle Segers op zoek naar wat trauma is. En naar wat wij allemaal kunnen doen voor kinderen die de pech hebben om ermee geconfronteerd te worden. Ze doet dat samen met overlevers van trauma, met kinderpsychiater Eva Kestens en andere experten. Een podcast van Veerle Segers en Eva Kestens, in samenwerking met Kiem en SOS Kinderdorpen België en met de steun van het OverHoop-project van de Koning Boudewijnstichting en de Vlaamse Overheid. Reageren kan via ziemijpodcast op Instagram Productie: De Hofleveranciers Muziek: Steve Kashala en Yarno Hoedemaekers Mix: Bennert Robberecht voor Option Media

In elke lagere schoolklas zitten minstens drie kinderen die ingrijpende gebeurtenissen meemaken of hebben meegemaakt. Nog al te vaak worden deze traumatische ervaringen niet gezien en herkend. Terwijl het een grote impact heeft op deze kinderen en hun verdere leven. In deze podcast gaat Veerle Segers op zoek naar wat trauma is. En naar wat wij allemaal kunnen doen voor kinderen die de pech hebben om ermee geconfronteerd te worden. Ze doet dat samen met overlevers van trauma, met kinderpsychiater Eva Kestens en andere experten. Een podcast van Veerle Segers en Eva Kestens, in samenwerking met Kiem en SOS Kinderdorpen België en met de steun van het OverHoop-project van de Koning Boudewijnstichting en de Vlaamse Overheid. Reageren kan via ziemijpodcast op Instagram Productie: De Hofleveranciers Muziek: Steve Kashala en Yarno Hoedemaekers Mix: Bennert Robberecht voor Option Media

Zie mij

The latest autism research news stories with ASF Chief Science Officer Alycia Halladay

cognitive ability – ASF Weekly Science Podcasts

I Begreppsbiblioteket vrider och vänder vi på statsvetenskapens centrala begrepp tillsammans med forskare vid Uppsala universitet.                                                       

Vi som gör Begreppsbiblioteket är Kajsa Edholm, Rebecca Eriksson, Tove Hellkvist, Isa Lappalainen och Johan Wejryd.  Podden är  producerad av statsvetenskapliga institutionen vid Uppsala universitet.

I Begreppsbiblioteket vrider och vänder vi på statsvetenskapens centrala begrepp tillsammans med forskare vid Uppsala universitet. Vi som gör Begreppsbiblioteket är Kajsa Edholm, Rebecca Eriksson, Tove Hellkvist, Isa Lappalainen och Johan Wejryd. Podden är producerad av statsvetenskapliga institutionen vid Uppsala universitet.

Begreppsbiblioteket

Machiavelli in the Ivory Tower is a new videocast series on arms control, nonproliferation, and international security issues. In each episode, hosts Sarah Bidgood and Hanna Notte discuss cutting-edge research and what it means for the most pressing challenges facing policymakers today. In conversation with expert guests, Sarah and Hanna break down these complex topics in ways that bridge the divide between scholarship and the real world. Join them each month as they bring Machiavelli into the Ivory Tower!

Machiavelli in the Ivory Tower

In early 2024, an unprecedented new policy championed as a potential lifeline for New York City’s strangled streets will launch despite years of political clashes: congestion pricing tolls charging drivers to enter Manhattan’s central business district. Designed to cut traffic congestion while boosting struggling mass transit finances, the controversial move will test global assumptions about curbing car dependency in major metros. If the ambitious scheme succeeds, it could inspire an urban mobility revolution across America. But skeptics question whether the complex, cumbersome system can really slim chocking overcrowding without crippling commutes or deepening divides. As installations take shape across 60th Street checkpoints, the next chapter in NYC’s transportation history dawns. Will pricing finally ease gridlock by making drivers consider alternatives? Or will political infighting, technical glitches and pandemic uncertainty turn congestion pricing into a boondoggle crushing working-class motorists? With the world watching, New York again becomes an urban laboratory gambling on innovation. The city’s economic vitality and quality of life hangs in the balance. Why Congestion Pricing? Understanding the Historic Step The central premise of congestion pricing rests on leveraging basic supply vs demand principles. By placing a premium on entering high-traffic zones, a portion of drivers supposedly decide avoiding charges makes more sense than absorbing fees to haul vehicles downtown. Even relatively small reductions in daily cars then create outsize cumulative impacts easing congested corridors for all. Early evidence from cities pioneering various pricing models confirms charging works better than building new roads endlessly devoured by induced demand. In New York’s case, the acute crisis level traffic strangling economic productivity justifies unprecedented action. NYC ranks as America’s most congested metropolis, costing an estimated $20 billion per year in delays and pollution. Labyrinthine streets and aging infrastructure groan under 13,000 taxis, 80,000 rideshare vehicles including Uber and Lyft and a surging delivery truck presence thanks to Amazon and food delivery apps. Population and job growth further clog limited road capacity. And with the NYC region expecting 1 million additional residents by 2040, only bolder policies present hopes of avoiding total gridlock disaster. Meanwhile the city’s decaying, underfunded subway system creaks under record ridership, sparking calls for dramatic changes before chronic delays and failing signals cause economic catastrophe. Linking congestion fees to transit upgrades earned support from politicians and wonks. But skepticism brewed alongside support from the start. Roots of Modern Proposal In truth, charging drivers in some form to access America's largest business district has arisen periodically for 50 years. As far back as Mayor John Lindsay in the early 1970s, multiple city studies and panels have mused congestion pricing might alleviate intractable jams. But auto industry lobbying might and outer borough middle-class unease torpedoed those early conversations. By 2007 Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s administration formulated a congestion pricing framework to charge $8 for entering core Manhattan areas below 86th Street on weekdays while rebating bridge tolls and funding transit repairs with net revenues. Despite approval from the City Council and initial state legislature passage, political disputes doomed that bill amidst recession fears and resistance from suburban constituencies. Ever since, transit advocates pushed congestion pricing proposals during new mayoral administrations and Governor Cuomo’s terms before finally gaining serious momentum under current Mayor Eric Adams and Governor Kathy Hochul in 2021-2022. Key Details of Approved Plan Under language passed by the state legislature in Spring 2022, key components of NYC’s approved congestion pricing plan include: 1. Charging a daily variable toll for personal vehicles to enter Manhattan below 60th St 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with exemptions after 9pm. 2. Trucks and taxis/rideshares are charged separate higher tolls on all days from 6 am-8 pm (12am on weekdays for taxis). 3. Exemptions for disabled drivers, emergency services, some low-income commuters, and others. 4. Oversight and yearly evaluations by a six-person Traffic Mobility Review Board. 6. Revenues funding $15 billion capital plan to modernize aging subways, buses, accessibility and expand transit access to underserved boroughs. Slated to launch by the end of 2023, the program suffered expected delays in installing hundreds of street sensors and tolling infrastructure across entry checkpoints along 60th Street. But charging infrastructure buildout nears completion to make a 2024 opening feasible. Fierce Opposition Drives Complex Final Plan Despite being passionately championed by transit activists for decades as a proven remedy to NYC’s traffic headaches, establishing congestion pricing demanded complex balancing of concerns raised by local drivers reliant on regional commutes far from robust public transport options. Affluent Manhattanites might easily absorb modest tolls to preserve quality of life and economic necessity of functional streets, subways and buses. But outer borough and suburban resistance cried foul over regressive impacts on working and middle class automobile commuters lacking alternate routes into city centers. Valid worries emerged over burdening small business deliveries or logistics companies with spiraling costs certain to raise consumer prices. If designed too broadly or bluntly, charges could seriously damage regional economic diversity and competitiveness against peer cities offering free flows of labor. As a result, final approved plans exempted key constituent groups to ease passage. Disability advocates secured pardons so disabled New Yorkers avoid exclusion from transit bottlenecks pricing might not solve alone. Manhattan lawmakers ensured extended evening and weekend grace periods for local entertainment industries fearing toll avoidance would cripple restaurants or theaters. Construction industry carve outs shielded trade workers getting to sites during early hours. Still, skepticism festered in neighborhoods where driving remains essential, like eastern Queens or southern Brooklyn. Another key concession establishing equity exemptions for specific lower income drivers helped congestion pricing pass its final political hurdles with support from skeptical social justice groups. Complicated verification processes allowing drivers from lower tax zip codes to petition skipping tolls during work hours eased concerns over regressive costs, even if applications may prove burdensome. Diverse coalitions backing discounted fares on transit options for low income neighborhoods also buffered pricing resistance. Together the finely tuned adjustments and eligibility clauses won over enough city and state representatives to pass congestion pricing while giving vulnerable commuters potential relief. But efforts to balance burdens and benefits during the long legislative journey demonstrate why no American city has attempted anything similar despite successes abroad. Uncertain Technical Outlook Beyond political clashes, delivering a smoothly functioning system able to charge hundreds of thousands of different vehicles across an invisible daily border poses dizzying logistical puzzles New York must still solve over coming months. Integration challenges between sensors, databases, payment processors and variable pricing algorithms leave observers nervous despite progress installing toll booth infrastructure and windshield tag registers. The scheme’s viability relies on effectively tracking cars entering or exiting the zone then seamlessly charging EZ-Pass account holders or mailing bills to license plates of vehicles lacking radio transponders. Plans promise toll amounts ability to flux in real-time based on traffic volumes or other data to properly balance road usage. But unforeseen issues plague even basic infrastructure elements so far. Open FOIL requests revealed installation delays thanks to sensor malfunctions misidentifying truck types during testing. Ongoing summer 2023 maintenance woes with MTA infrastructure like tunnel flooding or delayed signal repairs cast doubt on agency capacity to handle billions in promised upgrades tied to pricing revenue. Though most equipment should function adequately thanks to global expertise, concerns around sales estimates or revenue bonds missing targets leave next to zero margin for error. Any sizable shortfall or need for subsidy could unravel political and public support. The whole program’s survival likely requires nearly flawless activation. Potential Impacts: Traffic &amp; Transit Changes If the maze of sensors, cameras and transponders shape an effective charging network once switched on, theory suggests traffic patterns could transform rapidly around Manhattan’s 60th Street delineation. But forecasting precise impacts across interwoven transport networks and traveler decisions contains uncertainty. Best case scenarios let NYC emulate famous traffic turnarounds in Singapore, London and Stockholm after implementing similar city center charges calibrated to local contexts. An oft cited 2020 report by city planners predicted 20-30% reductions in personally owned vehicles circulating Manhattan’s busiest blocks, easing gridlock significantly while curbing emissions. They expect majority transit migration alongside UberPool and carpooling incentives plus boosted commuter walking and biking. This tailwind of cong

In early 2024, an unprecedented new policy championed as a potential lifeline for New York City’s strangled streets will launch despite years of political clashes: congestion pricing tolls charging drivers to enter Manhattan’s central business district. Designed to cut traffic congestion while boosting struggling mass transit finances, the controversial move will test global assumptions about curbing car dependency in major metros. If the ambitious scheme succeeds, it could inspire an urban mobility revolution across America. But skeptics question whether the complex, cumbersome system can really slim chocking overcrowding without crippling commutes or deepening divides. As installations take shape across 60th Street checkpoints, the next chapter in NYC’s transportation history dawns. Will pricing finally ease gridlock by making drivers consider alternatives? Or will political infighting, technical glitches and pandemic uncertainty turn congestion pricing into a boondoggle crushing working-class motorists? With the world watching, New York again becomes an urban laboratory gambling on innovation. The city’s economic vitality and quality of life hangs in the balance. Why Congestion Pricing? Understanding the Historic Step The central premise of congestion pricing rests on leveraging basic supply vs demand principles. By placing a premium on entering high-traffic zones, a portion of drivers supposedly decide avoiding charges makes more sense than absorbing fees to haul vehicles downtown. Even relatively small reductions in daily cars then create outsize cumulative impacts easing congested corridors for all. Early evidence from cities pioneering various pricing models confirms charging works better than building new roads endlessly devoured by induced demand. In New York’s case, the acute crisis level traffic strangling economic productivity justifies unprecedented action. NYC ranks as America’s most congested metropolis, costing an estimated $20 billion per year in delays and pollution. Labyrinthine streets and aging infrastructure groan under 13,000 taxis, 80,000 rideshare vehicles including Uber and Lyft and a surging delivery truck presence thanks to Amazon and food delivery apps. Population and job growth further clog limited road capacity. And with the NYC region expecting 1 million additional residents by 2040, only bolder policies present hopes of avoiding total gridlock disaster. Meanwhile the city’s decaying, underfunded subway system creaks under record ridership, sparking calls for dramatic changes before chronic delays and failing signals cause economic catastrophe. Linking congestion fees to transit upgrades earned support from politicians and wonks. But skepticism brewed alongside support from the start. Roots of Modern Proposal In truth, charging drivers in some form to access America's largest business district has arisen periodically for 50 years. As far back as Mayor John Lindsay in the early 1970s, multiple city studies and panels have mused congestion pricing might alleviate intractable jams. But auto industry lobbying might and outer borough middle-class unease torpedoed those early conversations. By 2007 Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s administration formulated a congestion pricing framework to charge $8 for entering core Manhattan areas below 86th Street on weekdays while rebating bridge tolls and funding transit repairs with net revenues. Despite approval from the City Council and initial state legislature passage, political disputes doomed that bill amidst recession fears and resistance from suburban constituencies. Ever since, transit advocates pushed congestion pricing proposals during new mayoral administrations and Governor Cuomo’s terms before finally gaining serious momentum under current Mayor Eric Adams and Governor Kathy Hochul in 2021-2022. Key Details of Approved Plan Under language passed by the state legislature in Spring 2022, key components of NYC’s approved congestion pricing plan include: 1. Charging a daily variable toll for personal vehicles to enter Manhattan below 60th St 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with exemptions after 9pm. 2. Trucks and taxis/rideshares are charged separate higher tolls on all days from 6 am-8 pm (12am on weekdays for taxis). 3. Exemptions for disabled drivers, emergency services, some low-income commuters, and others. 4. Oversight and yearly evaluations by a six-person Traffic Mobility Review Board. 6. Revenues funding $15 billion capital plan to modernize aging subways, buses, accessibility and expand transit access to underserved boroughs. Slated to launch by the end of 2023, the program suffered expected delays in installing hundreds of street sensors and tolling infrastructure across entry checkpoints along 60th Street. But charging infrastructure buildout nears completion to make a 2024 opening feasible. Fierce Opposition Drives Complex Final Plan Despite being passionately championed by transit activists for decades as a proven remedy to NYC’s traffic headaches, establishing congestion pricing demanded complex balancing of concerns raised by local drivers reliant on regional commutes far from robust public transport options. Affluent Manhattanites might easily absorb modest tolls to preserve quality of life and economic necessity of functional streets, subways and buses. But outer borough and suburban resistance cried foul over regressive impacts on working and middle class automobile commuters lacking alternate routes into city centers. Valid worries emerged over burdening small business deliveries or logistics companies with spiraling costs certain to raise consumer prices. If designed too broadly or bluntly, charges could seriously damage regional economic diversity and competitiveness against peer cities offering free flows of labor. As a result, final approved plans exempted key constituent groups to ease passage. Disability advocates secured pardons so disabled New Yorkers avoid exclusion from transit bottlenecks pricing might not solve alone. Manhattan lawmakers ensured extended evening and weekend grace periods for local entertainment industries fearing toll avoidance would cripple restaurants or theaters. Construction industry carve outs shielded trade workers getting to sites during early hours. Still, skepticism festered in neighborhoods where driving remains essential, like eastern Queens or southern Brooklyn. Another key concession establishing equity exemptions for specific lower income drivers helped congestion pricing pass its final political hurdles with support from skeptical social justice groups. Complicated verification processes allowing drivers from lower tax zip codes to petition skipping tolls during work hours eased concerns over regressive costs, even if applications may prove burdensome. Diverse coalitions backing discounted fares on transit options for low income neighborhoods also buffered pricing resistance. Together the finely tuned adjustments and eligibility clauses won over enough city and state representatives to pass congestion pricing while giving vulnerable commuters potential relief. But efforts to balance burdens and benefits during the long legislative journey demonstrate why no American city has attempted anything similar despite successes abroad. Uncertain Technical Outlook Beyond political clashes, delivering a smoothly functioning system able to charge hundreds of thousands of different vehicles across an invisible daily border poses dizzying logistical puzzles New York must still solve over coming months. Integration challenges between sensors, databases, payment processors and variable pricing algorithms leave observers nervous despite progress installing toll booth infrastructure and windshield tag registers. The scheme’s viability relies on effectively tracking cars entering or exiting the zone then seamlessly charging EZ-Pass account holders or mailing bills to license plates of vehicles lacking radio transponders. Plans promise toll amounts ability to flux in real-time based on traffic volumes or other data to properly balance road usage. But unforeseen issues plague even basic infrastructure elements so far. Open FOIL requests revealed installation delays thanks to sensor malfunctions misidentifying truck types during testing. Ongoing summer 2023 maintenance woes with MTA infrastructure like tunnel flooding or delayed signal repairs cast doubt on agency capacity to handle billions in promised upgrades tied to pricing revenue. Though most equipment should function adequately thanks to global expertise, concerns around sales estimates or revenue bonds missing targets leave next to zero margin for error. Any sizable shortfall or need for subsidy could unravel political and public support. The whole program’s survival likely requires nearly flawless activation. Potential Impacts: Traffic & Transit Changes If the maze of sensors, cameras and transponders shape an effective charging network once switched on, theory suggests traffic patterns could transform rapidly around Manhattan’s 60th Street delineation. But forecasting precise impacts across interwoven transport networks and traveler decisions contains uncertainty. Best case scenarios let NYC emulate famous traffic turnarounds in Singapore, London and Stockholm after implementing similar city center charges calibrated to local contexts. An oft cited 2020 report by city planners predicted 20-30% reductions in personally owned vehicles circulating Manhattan’s busiest blocks, easing gridlock significantly while curbing emissions. They expect majority transit migration alongside UberPool and carpooling incentives plus boosted commuter walking and biking. This tailwind of cong

In early 2024, an unprecedented new policy championed as a potential lifeline for New York City’s strangled streets will launch despite years of political clashes: congestion pricing tolls charging drivers to enter Manhattan’s central business district. Designed to cut traffic congestion while boosting struggling mass transit finances, the controversial move will test global assumptions about curbing car dependency in major metros. If the ambitious scheme succeeds, it could inspire an urban mobility revolution across America. But skeptics question whether the complex, cumbersome system can really slim chocking overcrowding without crippling commutes or deepening divides. As installations take shape across 60th Street checkpoints, the next chapter in NYC’s transportation history dawns. Will pricing finally ease gridlock by making drivers consider alternatives? Or will political infighting, technical glitches and pandemic uncertainty turn congestion pricing into a boondoggle crushing working-class motorists? With the world watching, New York again becomes an urban laboratory gambling on innovation. The city’s economic vitality and quality of life hangs in the balance. Why Congestion Pricing? Understanding the Historic Step The central premise of congestion pricing rests on leveraging basic supply vs demand principles. By placing a premium on entering high-traffic zones, a portion of drivers supposedly decide avoiding charges makes more sense than absorbing fees to haul vehicles downtown. Even relatively small reductions in daily cars then create outsize cumulative impacts easing congested corridors for all. Early evidence from cities pioneering various pricing models confirms charging works better than building new roads endlessly devoured by induced demand. In New York’s case, the acute crisis level traffic strangling economic productivity justifies unprecedented action. NYC ranks as America’s most congested metropolis, costing an estimated $20 billion per year in delays and pollution. Labyrinthine streets and aging infrastructure groan under 13,000 taxis, 80,000 rideshare vehicles including Uber and Lyft and a surging delivery truck presence thanks to Amazon and food delivery apps. Population and job growth further clog limited road capacity. And with the NYC region expecting 1 million additional residents by 2040, only bolder policies present hopes of avoiding total gridlock disaster. Meanwhile the city’s decaying, underfunded subway system creaks under record ridership, sparking calls for dramatic changes before chronic delays and failing signals cause economic catastrophe. Linking congestion fees to transit upgrades earned support from politicians and wonks. But skepticism brewed alongside support from the start. Roots of Modern Proposal In truth, charging drivers in some form to access America's largest business district has arisen periodically for 50 years. As far back as Mayor John Lindsay in the early 1970s, multiple city studies and panels have mused congestion pricing might alleviate intractable jams. But auto industry lobbying might and outer borough middle-class unease torpedoed those early conversations. By 2007 Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s administration formulated a congestion pricing framework to charge $8 for entering core Manhattan areas below 86th Street on weekdays while rebating bridge tolls and funding transit repairs with net revenues. Despite approval from the City Council and initial state legislature passage, political disputes doomed that bill amidst recession fears and resistance from suburban constituencies. Ever since, transit advocates pushed congestion pricing proposals during new mayoral administrations and Governor Cuomo’s terms before finally gaining serious momentum under current Mayor Eric Adams and Governor Kathy Hochul in 2021-2022. Key Details of Approved Plan Under language passed by the state legislature in Spring 2022, key components of NYC’s approved congestion pricing plan include: 1. Charging a daily variable toll for personal vehicles to enter Manhattan below 60th St 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, with exemptions after 9pm. 2. Trucks and taxis/rideshares are charged separate higher tolls on all days from 6 am-8 pm (12am on weekdays for taxis). 3. Exemptions for disabled drivers, emergency services, some low-income commuters, and others. 4. Oversight and yearly evaluations by a six-person Traffic Mobility Review Board. 6. Revenues funding $15 billion capital plan to modernize aging subways, buses, accessibility and expand transit access to underserved boroughs. Slated to launch by the end of 2023, the program suffered expected delays in installing hundreds of street sensors and tolling infrastructure across entry checkpoints along 60th Street. But charging infrastructure buildout nears completion to make a 2024 opening feasible. Fierce Opposition Drives Complex Final Plan Despite being passionately championed by transit activists for decades as a proven remedy to NYC’s traffic headaches, establishing congestion pricing demanded complex balancing of concerns raised by local drivers reliant on regional commutes far from robust public transport options. Affluent Manhattanites might easily absorb modest tolls to preserve quality of life and economic necessity of functional streets, subways and buses. But outer borough and suburban resistance cried foul over regressive impacts on working and middle class automobile commuters lacking alternate routes into city centers. Valid worries emerged over burdening small business deliveries or logistics companies with spiraling costs certain to raise consumer prices. If designed too broadly or bluntly, charges could seriously damage regional economic diversity and competitiveness against peer cities offering free flows of labor. As a result, final approved plans exempted key constituent groups to ease passage. Disability advocates secured pardons so disabled New Yorkers avoid exclusion from transit bottlenecks pricing might not solve alone. Manhattan lawmakers ensured extended evening and weekend grace periods for local entertainment industries fearing toll avoidance would cripple restaurants or theaters. Construction industry carve outs shielded trade workers getting to sites during early hours. Still, skepticism festered in neighborhoods where driving remains essential, like eastern Queens or southern Brooklyn. Another key concession establishing equity exemptions for specific lower income drivers helped congestion pricing pass its final political hurdles with support from skeptical social justice groups. Complicated verification processes allowing drivers from lower tax zip codes to petition skipping tolls during work hours eased concerns over regressive costs, even if applications may prove burdensome. Diverse coalitions backing discounted fares on transit options for low income neighborhoods also buffered pricing resistance. Together the finely tuned adjustments and eligibility clauses won over enough city and state representatives to pass congestion pricing while giving vulnerable commuters potential relief. But efforts to balance burdens and benefits during the long legislative journey demonstrate why no American city has attempted anything similar despite successes abroad. Uncertain Technical Outlook Beyond political clashes, delivering a smoothly functioning system able to charge hundreds of thousands of different vehicles across an invisible daily border poses dizzying logistical puzzles New York must still solve over coming months. Integration challenges between sensors, databases, payment processors and variable pricing algorithms leave observers nervous despite progress installing toll booth infrastructure and windshield tag registers. The scheme’s viability relies on effectively tracking cars entering or exiting the zone then seamlessly charging EZ-Pass account holders or mailing bills to license plates of vehicles lacking radio transponders. Plans promise toll amounts ability to flux in real-time based on traffic volumes or other data to properly balance road usage. But unforeseen issues plague even basic infrastructure elements so far. Open FOIL requests revealed installation delays thanks to sensor malfunctions misidentifying truck types during testing. Ongoing summer 2023 maintenance woes with MTA infrastructure like tunnel flooding or delayed signal repairs cast doubt on agency capacity to handle billions in promised upgrades tied to pricing revenue. Though most equipment should function adequately thanks to global expertise, concerns around sales estimates or revenue bonds missing targets leave next to zero margin for error. Any sizable shortfall or need for subsidy could unravel political and public support. The whole program’s survival likely requires nearly flawless activation. Potential Impacts: Traffic &amp; Transit Changes If the maze of sensors, cameras and transponders shape an effective charging network once switched on, theory suggests traffic patterns could transform rapidly around Manhattan’s 60th Street delineation. But forecasting precise impacts across interwoven transport networks and traveler decisions contains uncertainty. Best case scenarios let NYC emulate famous traffic turnarounds in Singapore, London and Stockholm after implementing similar city center charges calibrated to local contexts. An oft cited 2020 report by city planners predicted 20-30% reductions in personally owned vehicles circulating Manhattan’s busiest blocks, easing gridlock significantly while curbing emissions. They expect majority transit migration alongside UberPool and carpooling incentives plus boosted commuter walking and biking. This tailwind of cong

Congestion Pricing - Gridlock Be Gone?

Discussing various issues with a pitcher of salt

The Rant by Tireni

PODCAST

An exploration of mapping and spatial analysis for historical and archaeological projects using open source tools.  New episodes every other week! Next episode: Thursday, March 4!

An exploration of mapping and spatial analysis for historical and archaeological projects using open source tools. New episodes every other week! Next episode: Thursday, March 4!

Social Sciences Podcasts / Page 193

Huvudnyheterna

海辛

Raindance. Research and Development in Video Art and Media Ecology

Empowerista

UM NOVO FAST FOOD PARA VOCÊ:O MUNDO DO TRABALHO E A EDUCAÇÃO

The Leader's Kitbag

O Podcast, O Conceito

Recovering Community

Não Compre Jornais, Minta Você Mesmo

法治的细节 政法大学教授罗翔

普通心理学|每天6分钟学点心理学

Scientista

Hästkraft

Latin American Perspectives

The Liberty & Slavery Podcast

Evolución Legal

Technology Archives - C. G. Jung Institute of Chicago

Austerity Radio | راديو التقشف

क्या हो अगर - What If India

Underground History

Na rozcestí

Sociologipodden

Talk On — Debates in Anthropology

Conversations to Connect

Ungár Péter Podcast

三節棍

Imagine Wellness: Real Talk With Behavior Change Baddies

Zie mij

cognitive ability – ASF Weekly Science Podcasts

Begreppsbiblioteket

Machiavelli in the Ivory Tower

Congestion Pricing - Gridlock Be Gone?

The Rant by Tireni

PODCAST

The Helonaki Deep Dive

Voices Across the Border

The Art of Human Change

the void

The Dickinson Law Review Podcast

RADIS redet

Juguito de Teoría Geek

PORQUE PRECISAMOS DOS OUTROS PARA SERMOS NÓS.

Unsubstantiated

The xSDG Podcast

Vorworte zum Norddeutschen Leseförderkongress - ein Bücherpiraten-Podcast

Unlearn to Learn

聊腦洞大開

Indian American Stories Podcast

High altars; the battle-fields of France

Some Unapproved Thinking | Forbidden History | Conspiracy Insights | Hidden Hist...

法治的细节政法大学教授罗翔