There has been an assassination attempt against Donald Trump. You know all about this, of course. You’ve heard all the details, and much of the generic analysis of the situation.
I’m not going to bother repeating that. Instead, I’m going to speak specifically to the impact of this assassination attempt on the movement to resist Christian Nationalism. I’m going to talk about how this event changes the outlook for our resistance, and what it means for the form our resistance can take. I’ll also discuss how top Republican Party insiders are using the assassination attempt as an excuse to amplify their elevation of Christian Nationalism.
Republican former US Attorney General Bill Barr says, “Democrats have to stop their grossly irresponsible talk about Trump being an existential threat to democracy.” Yet, in the past few months, Barr has said the same thing about Joe Biden several times. Less than two weeks ago, for example, Barr said that “I think the threat to democracy and the threat to the United States and the most damage would be done by four more years of Biden.”
Republican and potential Trump vice presidential running mate JD Vance says that warnings about Trump being a potential dictator are what sent the bullets flying through the air: “The central premise of the Biden campaign is that President Donald Trump is an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs. That rhetoric led directly to President Trump’s attempted assassination.”
According to JD Vance, guns don’t kill people. Liberals warning that Donald Trump wants to become an authoritarian dictator somehow send bullets flying through the air. Has anyone said that Donald Trump must be stopped at all costs? Well, there have been some…
A couple of weeks ago, when the US Supreme Court ruled that as a former President of the United States, Donald Trump has immunity for pretty much any crime he committed while President, a listener wrote a comment in response to something I wrote. He said that he was sick and tired of hearing people talk about the need for activism.
“People are always saying we need to get politically active, and it never comes to anything. It’s time we start throwing punches. We need to fight for our freedom, to take up arms to defend our democracy. I’m imagining a Civil War. I’ll take as many of them with me as I can.”
These were anonymous comments, left under a pseudonym. For all I know, they could have been left by Matthew Crooks, the 20 year-old who had been trained to use a rifle to shoot at people from a distance.
When I read these comments, I thought of a podcast episode created by my cousin, Anise Cook, as part of our project to provide Iowa voters information about a Christian Nationalist network that was helping Donald Trump win the Iowa caucuses and seize the Republican presidential nomination.
The following is a shortened version of what she said:
It's looking very dark. We're talking about a Republican presidential nominee proposing massive prison camps, and deportations, and the execution of his enemy, and the suspension of the Constitution, and using the military against peaceful protestors, about rooting out Americans like vermin, treating people like they're rats and cockroaches.
A person came to me and said, “I think we may have to prepare to fight back. We may have to prepare to defend ourselves.” The one thought that I had when I heard him say that is, if it comes to that, I don't want to fight back. If Donald Trump gains power and he actually does the things that he is threatening to do, if he enacts the retribution and punishment and judgment that his preachers are encouraging him to, I don't want to fight back.
I say, let them come and let them kill me, and that will be a fine death. Just don't make it slow, but fighting back is the one thing we must not do.
Here's why: Fighting back justifies their extremism. I knew back in the 1990s some anarchists who would go to places like Seattle, and they would infiltrate good, peaceful protests on good social issues, and then they would start to break glass and smash things, and the protests would lose all of their credibility. They would become street battles against the police, and it didn't bring any good end for the causes that people were protesting about. It only made it more difficult to go work on those issues. They were discredited.
They are looking for an excuse, and we cannot give it to them.
We're not going to defeat Donald Trump by fighting him militarily or through some kind of crazy guerrilla movement to try to rise up against him violently with guns if he becomes president.
If we actually believe in democracy and freedom, which means respect for all points of view and true diversity, we have to show what it means to get along in a nation with people with whom we desperately, desperately disagree, and that includes Donald Trump. And that includes people like the preachers of the Iowa Faith Leader Coalition, even as they talk about punishment and vengeance and going to war against other Americans. We cannot meet them where they are.
We have to contest them democratically by defeating them at the polls in November 2024. It can be tempting to think that we're going to get angry and we're going to fight them. But when we do that, we are in danger of becoming them, of becoming a shadow of them.
When the Nazis rose to power, they did so based upon the excuse that communists were on the verge of taking over Germany, and that communist gangs of thugs were going through the streets of Germany and were endangering the people. The Nazis promised they were going to keep everybody safe. They were going to restore the peace. They were going to restore order. Donald Trump is using some of that same language now. He talks about criminal gangs of immigrants. He talks about Marxist thugs.
We need to demonstrate the values of democracy that we seek to preserve. And that doesn't mean that we're weak, and it doesn't mean that we're inactive.
It means that we show restraint. It means that we show discretion. It means that we get organized and we get active.
It means that we speak the truth instead of speaking with our fists. It means that we have to be dedicated to nonviolence no matter what. I hope that we can do that.
I am afraid that there are some people who do not desire such a thing. In the coming months, we shall see which vision holds.