In this 39-page motion filed on April 7, 2025, Sean Combs’ legal team asks the court to exclude any reference to alleged prior sexual assaults under Federal Rules of Evidence 413 and 404(b). They argue that Rule 413 only applies when a defendant is formally charged with a sexual assault offense, which Combs is not—his current charges involve racketeering, sex trafficking, and related crimes, but not specific counts of sexual assault. Therefore, they assert the government’s attempt to admit uncharged sexual assault allegations under Rule 413 is legally improper and violates the plain text and legislative intent of the rule.

Additionally, the motion challenges the admissibility of this evidence under Rule 404(b), which governs the use of prior bad acts to show motive, opportunity, or intent. Combs’ attorneys argue that the government’s notice is procedurally deficient and that the proposed evidence relies heavily on impermissible character inferences—essentially suggesting that because Combs allegedly committed bad acts before, he is more likely to have committed the crimes he’s charged with now. They also invoke Rule 403, saying the evidence has low probative value, is highly inflammatory, and would result in mini-trials over unrelated allegations, confusing the jury and unfairly prejudicing Combs. At minimum, the defense requests a preliminary hearing to assess the reliability of the evidence before it’s presented at trial.


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.213.0.pdf

In this 39-page motion filed on April 7, 2025, Sean Combs’ legal team asks the court to exclude any reference to alleged prior sexual assaults under Federal Rules of Evidence 413 and 404(b). They argue that Rule 413 only applies when a defendant is formally charged with a sexual assault offense, which Combs is not—his current charges involve racketeering, sex trafficking, and related crimes, but not specific counts of sexual assault. Therefore, they assert the government’s attempt to admit uncharged sexual assault allegations under Rule 413 is legally improper and violates the plain text and legislative intent of the rule.

Additionally, the motion challenges the admissibility of this evidence under Rule 404(b), which governs the use of prior bad acts to show motive, opportunity, or intent. Combs’ attorneys argue that the government’s notice is procedurally deficient and that the proposed evidence relies heavily on impermissible character inferences—essentially suggesting that because Combs allegedly committed bad acts before, he is more likely to have committed the crimes he’s charged with now. They also invoke Rule 403, saying the evidence has low probative value, is highly inflammatory, and would result in mini-trials over unrelated allegations, confusing the jury and unfairly prejudicing Combs. At minimum, the defense requests a preliminary hearing to assess the reliability of the evidence before it’s presented at trial.


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.213.0.pdf

Sean "Diddy" Combs has bolstered his legal team by adding two new high-profile attorneys: Anthony Ricco, a renowned trial lawyer, and Alexandra Shapiro, an appellate expert. This decision comes amid his ongoing legal battle after his September 2024 arrest on charges of sex trafficking and racketeering. Combs is accused of being involved in a wide-ranging conspiracy, leading to a highly publicized case. His legal team is now making a third attempt to secure his release on bail after previous denials.

In their latest filing, Combs' defense proposed a $50 million bail package, which included stringent conditions such as no female visitors outside his family. Despite this, U.S. District Judge Andrew Carter denied the request, citing concerns that Combs remained a danger to the public. His lawyers continue to argue for his release, claiming that he is innocent and poses no flight risk.



(commercial at 9:30)

to contact me:

[email protected]


source:

Diddy enlists high-powered legal team for THIRD bail attempt... two weeks after his arrest for sex trafficking charges | Daily Mail Online




The recent allegations against Sean "Diddy" Combs are serious, with attorney Tony Buzbee bringing forward the claims of over 120 individuals, including men, women, and minors. These accusations span decades and detail various instances of sexual abuse, trafficking, and exploitation. The claims involve abuse at hotels, private parties, and during professional encounters, such as auditions for Bad Boy Records.


Some of the most shocking allegations include minors being abused under the promise of career opportunities, as well as instances of drugging and sexual assault. Tony Buzbee has stated that these accusations are backed by evidence and will be pursued in court, with lawsuits expected to be filed soon..


Remember those floodgates we were talking about?   Well, not only have they opened, but the whole dam has now blown apart.

(commercial at 8:14)

to contact me:

[email protected]



Source:

Diddy faces new sexual abuse allegations from 120 accusers, with claims involving 9-year-old: lawyer | Fox News
show less

Plaintiffs allege that Plaskett knowingly participated in and helped facilitate Epstein’s sex trafficking operations in the U.S. Virgin Islands. They claim she visited Epstein’s New York mansion to solicit direct campaign contributions—repeatedly requesting $30,000 for her campaigns and the Democratic National Committee—and that Epstein then used his political influence to influence policies in the Virgin Islands. As general counsel for the Virgin Islands Economic Development Authority, Plaskett allegedly approved approximately $300 million in tax breaks that benefited Epstein’s businesses after receiving financial and professional support, including a job at a law firm connected to Epstein’s network.

The survivors also contend that Plaskett leveraged her political leverage to pressure local authorities—such as customs, Coast Guard, and airport officials—to relax oversight and allow Epstein to transport women and girls between New York and the Virgin Islands without encountering legal scrutiny. The plaintiffs argue that these actions weren’t isolated misjudgments but part of a calculated pattern enabling a broader trafficking enterprise, with Plaskett’s contributions and interventions central to Epstein’s unimpeded operation and global network.


to contact  me:

[email protected]



source:

Plaskett's attorney vows to fight 'baseless' lawsuit by Epstein victims | News | virginislandsdailynews.com

In the reply memorandum of law filed in Case No. 24-CV-08852, the Combs Defendants argue for the dismissal of Dexter Withers' First Amended Complaint, asserting that it fails to state a valid legal claim and relies heavily on conclusory and unsupported allegations. They contend that Withers does not provide concrete facts linking Sean Combs or any affiliated entities to the specific harm alleged. The reply reaffirms the defense's position that the complaint lacks the legal sufficiency required under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and fails to meet the standards for pleading direct involvement, intent, or causation.

The Combs Defendants also address Withers’ attempt to bring Macy’s into the suit, arguing that the inclusion of a third-party retailer further weakens the complaint’s coherence and legal foundation. They maintain that the plaintiff’s assertions are speculative, disjointed, and fail to show any actionable misconduct by the named entities. In requesting dismissal, the Combs legal team insists that the amended complaint is merely a rehash of previously inadequate claims and does not correct the deficiencies identified in the original filing. As such, they urge the court to dismiss the complaint in full and with prejudice.


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.632109.55.0.pdf

In the memorandum of law filed on June 24, 2025, Best Buy Co., Inc. moves to dismiss the complaint brought by Latroya Grayson, arguing that her claims are legally insufficient and fail to meet the required pleading standards. Best Buy asserts that Grayson’s complaint lacks specific factual allegations tying the company to any actionable misconduct. They contend that her claims are vague, conclusory, and do not provide enough detail to establish liability under any legal theory presented. Best Buy emphasizes that the complaint does not demonstrate how the company engaged in or was directly responsible for any wrongdoing that could support the causes of action alleged..


Furthermore, Best Buy argues that even if the facts alleged were accepted as true, they do not constitute a viable claim under the applicable law. The memorandum highlights deficiencies in Grayson’s legal assertions, including a failure to show damages or injury traceable to Best Buy’s conduct. The company also challenges any implied legal theories within the complaint as speculative and unsupported. As such, Best Buy requests that the court dismiss the case in its entirety with prejudice, citing the insufficiency of the complaint to survive a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.633985.71.0.pdf

In the memorandum of law filed on June 24, 2025, Best Buy Co., Inc. moves to dismiss the complaint brought by Latroya Grayson, arguing that her claims are legally insufficient and fail to meet the required pleading standards. Best Buy asserts that Grayson’s complaint lacks specific factual allegations tying the company to any actionable misconduct. They contend that her claims are vague, conclusory, and do not provide enough detail to establish liability under any legal theory presented. Best Buy emphasizes that the complaint does not demonstrate how the company engaged in or was directly responsible for any wrongdoing that could support the causes of action alleged..


Furthermore, Best Buy argues that even if the facts alleged were accepted as true, they do not constitute a viable claim under the applicable law. The memorandum highlights deficiencies in Grayson’s legal assertions, including a failure to show damages or injury traceable to Best Buy’s conduct. The company also challenges any implied legal theories within the complaint as speculative and unsupported. As such, Best Buy requests that the court dismiss the case in its entirety with prejudice, citing the insufficiency of the complaint to survive a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.633985.71.0.pdf

On the third day of jury selection in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial, the court progressed toward finalizing a pool of 45 qualified jurors. Judge Arun Subramanian conducted individual and group questioning, focusing on potential biases and jurors' ability to remain impartial despite extensive media coverage. Notably, several prospective jurors acknowledged familiarity with a 2016 surveillance video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. While some jurors claimed they could remain unbiased, others were dismissed due to concerns about their impartiality. The court aims to seat 12 jurors and six alternates, with opening statements scheduled for May 12 .


The day's proceedings also included unexpected moments. One potential juror revealed he worked at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, where Combs is currently held, leading to his dismissal. Another juror admitted to reposting a meme about Combs on social media, explaining he was "doomscrolling" at the time. Despite these revelations, the court completed the initial qualification phase, setting the stage for peremptory challenges to be exercised on Friday. Combs, who has been in custody since September 2024, faces charges including sex trafficking, racketeering, and transportation for purposes of prostitution. He has pleaded not guilty and could face life in prison if convicted .

On the fourth day of jury selection for Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial, the process focused on narrowing down the remaining pool of 45 prospective jurors. Judge Arun Subramanian, along with prosecutors and defense attorneys, conducted in-depth interviews to assess potential biases, particularly concerning jurors' exposure to a 2016 video showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura. Several candidates were dismissed due to their familiarity with the footage or personal experiences with sexual assault, which could affect their impartiality. The defense and prosecution utilized their peremptory strikes—ten for the defense and six for the prosecution—to finalize a panel of 12 jurors and six alternates. The selection process concluded on Friday, May 9, setting the stage for opening statements scheduled for Monday, May 12

Throughout the selection process, the court encountered a mix of serious and unexpected moments. Some prospective jurors shared personal traumas, including experiences with sexual assault, leading to their dismissal. Conversely, lighter moments emerged, such as a juror admitting to stealing a Harry Potter wand during their youth and another confessing to falling asleep while binge-watching a television series. Judge Subramanian even joked about the extensive list of names involved in the case, comparing it to a Tolkien novel. These instances highlighted the challenges of assembling an impartial jury for a high-profile case involving a celebrity defendant.



to contact me:

[email protected]



source:


Diddy trial delayed as judge makes shock ruling on witnesses | Daily Mail Online
show less

On the first day of jury selection in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal trial, the courtroom was filled with a diverse group of prospective jurors, each undergoing thorough questioning to assess their impartiality. Judge Arun Subramanian led the proceedings, aiming to narrow down the pool to 12 jurors and six alternates. The selection process involved detailed inquiries into the jurors' backgrounds, media consumption, and any potential biases, especially concerning the high-profile nature of the case and the serious charges involved. Notably, some jurors acknowledged familiarity with a widely circulated video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, and others mentioned exposure to related media content. Despite these admissions, several jurors affirmed their ability to remain objective, and 19 individuals were retained for further consideration.


The prosecution and defense teams meticulously evaluated the responses, with the defense expressing concerns over potential biases stemming from prior knowledge of the case. The court emphasized the importance of assembling a fair and impartial jury, given the gravity of the allegations, which include sex trafficking and racketeering. As the day concluded, the judge instructed the retained jurors to avoid media coverage and discussions about the case, underscoring the need for impartiality. Jury selection is set to continue, with opening statements scheduled for May 12.

On the second day of jury selection in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal sex trafficking trial, the court continued its meticulous process of vetting potential jurors. Judge Arun Subramanian conducted one-on-one interviews to assess biases and suitability for the high-profile case. Several prospective jurors were dismissed for various reasons: one admitted to daily marijuana use and expressed difficulty abstaining during the trial period; another believed Combs could "buy his way out of jail" due to his wealth; and a third had seen a video allegedly showing Combs assaulting his ex-girlfriend, Cassie Ventura, and was uncertain about remaining impartial. By the end of the day, 16 additional jurors were qualified, bringing the total to 35, with the goal of reaching 45 by the following day.


The trial, taking place in Manhattan, involves serious charges against Combs, including sex trafficking, racketeering, and transporting individuals for prostitution. Prosecutors allege that Combs orchestrated elaborate events described as “freak offs,” which were drug-fueled sex performances. Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges and has been held without bail since his arrest in September 2024. The court aims to seat a jury by Wednesday, May 7, with opening statements scheduled for May 12.


to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

Diddy trial replay: Potential jurors reference violent Combs video

In a lawsuit filed in October 2024, a woman identified as Jane Doe alleges that Sean "Diddy" Combs raped her during a Las Vegas afterparty in 2014. According to the complaint, Doe and her two friends were in Las Vegas over Memorial Day Weekend 2014. Doe claims she connected with Combs' party promoter, known only as "Internamtikonal Smoove," who invited her to an exclusive party at Club Rehab, where she met several celebrities, including Mary J. Blige, Lil' Kim, and Nicki Minaj. After the party, Doe attended an afterparty at Combs' suite at the Planet Hollywood hotel. After consuming one or two drinks from a Ciroc vodka bottle, Doe began to feel disoriented. Smoove directed her to an empty bedroom where she could rest, assuring her that the door would be locked. The next thing Doe recalls is waking up the following morning feeling very groggy and sore, with her entire body hurting and difficulty moving. She saw Combs in the corner of the room, shirtless and yelling loudly at someone over the phone. He was the only person in the room with her, and it was clear that someone else had been in the bed with her. Doe returned to her friends and slept for two days, vaguely remembering her friends trying to help with periodic offers of water.


Doe's lawsuit is part of a broader wave of legal actions against Combs, with over 100 individuals alleging sexual abuse. The allegations span decades and include claims of drugging, sexual assault, and rape. Combs has denied all allegations, with his legal team describing them as false and opportunistic. The legal proceedings are ongoing, with Combs currently facing federal charges of racketeering and sex trafficking, to which he has pleaded not guilty.




to contact me:

[email protected]



source:

gov.uscourts.nysd.630246.1.0.pdf