
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In Mahmoud v. Taylor the Supreme Court affirmed parents rights to remove their children from LGBTQ material used in public schools.
The Court ruled that opt-outs preserve separation of church and state, and protect parental rights.
The Dissent maintains that exposure is not the same thing as indoctrination, and opt-outs are at best going to be an administrative nightmare, at worst a religious veto on acceptable content.
Anastasia Boden of PLF joins to discuss.
By Andrew Heaton4.9
969969 ratings
In Mahmoud v. Taylor the Supreme Court affirmed parents rights to remove their children from LGBTQ material used in public schools.
The Court ruled that opt-outs preserve separation of church and state, and protect parental rights.
The Dissent maintains that exposure is not the same thing as indoctrination, and opt-outs are at best going to be an administrative nightmare, at worst a religious veto on acceptable content.
Anastasia Boden of PLF joins to discuss.

966 Listeners

882 Listeners

2,282 Listeners

1,121 Listeners

1,516 Listeners

2,895 Listeners

989 Listeners

6,550 Listeners

377 Listeners

729 Listeners

209 Listeners

3,810 Listeners

138 Listeners

115 Listeners

202 Listeners