
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In Mahmoud v. Taylor the Supreme Court affirmed parents rights to remove their children from LGBTQ material used in public schools.
The Court ruled that opt-outs preserve separation of church and state, and protect parental rights.
The Dissent maintains that exposure is not the same thing as indoctrination, and opt-outs are at best going to be an administrative nightmare, at worst a religious veto on acceptable content.
Anastasia Boden of PLF joins to discuss.
By Andrew Heaton4.9
969969 ratings
In Mahmoud v. Taylor the Supreme Court affirmed parents rights to remove their children from LGBTQ material used in public schools.
The Court ruled that opt-outs preserve separation of church and state, and protect parental rights.
The Dissent maintains that exposure is not the same thing as indoctrination, and opt-outs are at best going to be an administrative nightmare, at worst a religious veto on acceptable content.
Anastasia Boden of PLF joins to discuss.

970 Listeners

884 Listeners

2,271 Listeners

1,126 Listeners

1,515 Listeners

2,891 Listeners

991 Listeners

6,616 Listeners

377 Listeners

740 Listeners

209 Listeners

3,837 Listeners

152 Listeners

115 Listeners

215 Listeners