
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Investigatory Powers Act - or Snoopers' Charter to its critics - is a highly controversial new law. On one hand, it clarifies a host of vague laws which were out of date with modern technology - but it also enshrines new powers of digital observation and surveillance, which will be available to the British intelligence services, the police, and a host of government agencies.
In this programme, David Aaronovitch explores the specifics of this new law, including the new safeguards which it puts in place, including the new demand for warrants for government 'equipment interference' (or hacking) must now be signed off by a senior judge.
He also discusses the new legal requirement for Internet Service Providers to store data about our internet browsing habits and the power for government authorities to demand access to this information.
Does the new law mean we are safer? Better safeguarded against surveillance abuses? Susceptible to more government scrutiny? Or all three of these things?
CONTRIBUTORS
Bella Sankey, Director of Policy at the civil liberties advocacy organisation Liberty
David Anderson QC, the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation for the United Kingdom
Sir David Omand, visiting professor at King's College London and former Director of GCHQ
Producer: Richard Fenton-Smith
By BBC Radio 44.8
5353 ratings
The Investigatory Powers Act - or Snoopers' Charter to its critics - is a highly controversial new law. On one hand, it clarifies a host of vague laws which were out of date with modern technology - but it also enshrines new powers of digital observation and surveillance, which will be available to the British intelligence services, the police, and a host of government agencies.
In this programme, David Aaronovitch explores the specifics of this new law, including the new safeguards which it puts in place, including the new demand for warrants for government 'equipment interference' (or hacking) must now be signed off by a senior judge.
He also discusses the new legal requirement for Internet Service Providers to store data about our internet browsing habits and the power for government authorities to demand access to this information.
Does the new law mean we are safer? Better safeguarded against surveillance abuses? Susceptible to more government scrutiny? Or all three of these things?
CONTRIBUTORS
Bella Sankey, Director of Policy at the civil liberties advocacy organisation Liberty
David Anderson QC, the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation for the United Kingdom
Sir David Omand, visiting professor at King's College London and former Director of GCHQ
Producer: Richard Fenton-Smith

7,913 Listeners

1,086 Listeners

376 Listeners

863 Listeners

1,067 Listeners

5,576 Listeners

1,808 Listeners

1,729 Listeners

1,952 Listeners

38 Listeners

428 Listeners

73 Listeners

149 Listeners

746 Listeners

141 Listeners

108 Listeners

3,245 Listeners

20 Listeners

779 Listeners

1,010 Listeners

3,858 Listeners

851 Listeners

45 Listeners

48 Listeners