
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Investigatory Powers Act - or Snoopers' Charter to its critics - is a highly controversial new law. On one hand, it clarifies a host of vague laws which were out of date with modern technology - but it also enshrines new powers of digital observation and surveillance, which will be available to the British intelligence services, the police, and a host of government agencies.
In this programme, David Aaronovitch explores the specifics of this new law, including the new safeguards which it puts in place, including the new demand for warrants for government 'equipment interference' (or hacking) must now be signed off by a senior judge.
He also discusses the new legal requirement for Internet Service Providers to store data about our internet browsing habits and the power for government authorities to demand access to this information.
Does the new law mean we are safer? Better safeguarded against surveillance abuses? Susceptible to more government scrutiny? Or all three of these things?
CONTRIBUTORS
Bella Sankey, Director of Policy at the civil liberties advocacy organisation Liberty
David Anderson QC, the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation for the United Kingdom
Sir David Omand, visiting professor at King's College London and former Director of GCHQ
Producer: Richard Fenton-Smith
By BBC Radio 44.8
5353 ratings
The Investigatory Powers Act - or Snoopers' Charter to its critics - is a highly controversial new law. On one hand, it clarifies a host of vague laws which were out of date with modern technology - but it also enshrines new powers of digital observation and surveillance, which will be available to the British intelligence services, the police, and a host of government agencies.
In this programme, David Aaronovitch explores the specifics of this new law, including the new safeguards which it puts in place, including the new demand for warrants for government 'equipment interference' (or hacking) must now be signed off by a senior judge.
He also discusses the new legal requirement for Internet Service Providers to store data about our internet browsing habits and the power for government authorities to demand access to this information.
Does the new law mean we are safer? Better safeguarded against surveillance abuses? Susceptible to more government scrutiny? Or all three of these things?
CONTRIBUTORS
Bella Sankey, Director of Policy at the civil liberties advocacy organisation Liberty
David Anderson QC, the Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation for the United Kingdom
Sir David Omand, visiting professor at King's College London and former Director of GCHQ
Producer: Richard Fenton-Smith

7,907 Listeners

1,085 Listeners

377 Listeners

855 Listeners

1,072 Listeners

5,577 Listeners

1,807 Listeners

1,752 Listeners

1,955 Listeners

39 Listeners

424 Listeners

71 Listeners

153 Listeners

746 Listeners

145 Listeners

115 Listeners

3,234 Listeners

23 Listeners

791 Listeners

1,010 Listeners

3,880 Listeners

871 Listeners

49 Listeners

41 Listeners