
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Justices say the Voting Rights Act requires an inference of "intentional discrimination" before states can be ordered to draw minority-majority districts. Does this "gut" the VRA, as Democrats claim? How many House seats might be affected? And why has Justice Clarence Thomas argued the result might be less racial polarization?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
By Paul Gigot, The Wall Street Journal4.2
27362,736 ratings
The Justices say the Voting Rights Act requires an inference of "intentional discrimination" before states can be ordered to draw minority-majority districts. Does this "gut" the VRA, as Democrats claim? How many House seats might be affected? And why has Justice Clarence Thomas argued the result might be less racial polarization?
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

1,713 Listeners

4,420 Listeners

1,649 Listeners

1,538 Listeners

5,181 Listeners

4,909 Listeners

686 Listeners

1,448 Listeners

2,039 Listeners

2,835 Listeners

6,097 Listeners

720 Listeners

1,322 Listeners

8,447 Listeners

586 Listeners

151 Listeners

150 Listeners

1,121 Listeners

180 Listeners