
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or

![Thoughts On Money [TOM]](https://podcast-api-images.s3.amazonaws.com/corona/show/799405/logo_300x300.jpeg)
This week's blogpost - https://bahnsen.co/42ccBWB
In this week's Thoughts on Money, Trevor, Blaine, and Brett discuss Blaine's article, “The Next Bear Market,” which argues that a 20% market decline will happen at some point and that recent, fast recoveries (COVID, 2022, 2023 bank failures, and a short-lived 2025 ~19% drawdown) may be breeding investor complacency. They distinguish corrections (10%) from bear markets (20%), highlight how intra-year drawdowns often fade in annual returns, and emphasize the market’s interconnected participants, leverage-driven selling, and the expectation that the Fed will intervene. The group focuses on preparing through adequate liquidity and safety nets to avoid selling at the wrong time, understanding why you own assets, and emphasizing dividends and income as part of total return. They note risk surveys can misstate real behavior, advisors act as guides to help clients endure volatility, and premium returns require accepting volatility as the price of admission.
00:00 Podcast Intro
00:30 Why Bear Markets Happen
03:05 Drawdowns vs Annual Returns
05:02 Statement Pain Explained
07:19 Too Big to Fail Mindset
10:17 Complacency After Long Runs
18:40 Corrections vs Bear Markets
20:37 Risk Tolerance Reality Check
23:04 Long Horizon Portfolio Buckets
24:15 Focus on Dividends Not Price
25:47 Dividends And Total Return
26:22 Safety Nets And Inflation
27:31 Bear Markets And Labels
28:57 Recession Versus Bear
29:37 Markets Versus Economy
30:40 Why Cash Reserves Matter
32:51 Leverage And Forced Selling
34:24 Liquidity And Buyer Shortages
35:24 Life Transitions And Risk
37:00 Advisor Psychology And Coaching
40:38 Guides Expand Risk Tolerance
41:42 Portfolio Rules Of Thumb
43:38 Volatility Price Of Returns
45:32 Time Horizon Is The Edge
46:35 Wrap Up And Disclosures
Links mentioned in this episode:
This week's blogpost - https://bahnsen.co/4mUGiFb
Trevor Cummings hosts the Thoughts On Money podcast with Brett Bonecutter to discuss a due diligence hypothetical: if you could ask an advisor or investment manager only one question, it should be “How do you invest your money?” Drawing on Nassim Taleb’s “skin in the game” idea, Trevor argues behavior and portfolio holdings reveal true beliefs more than polished pitches. He recounts meeting a Twitter-famous fund manager whose personal investments didn’t match his fund strategy, reinforcing the “eat your own cooking” rule while noting it isn’t a complete substitute for full due diligence or diversification. The conversation explores aligned incentives versus fiduciary labels, Buffett’s Goldman Sachs deal requiring executives to retain shares (“buying the jockey”), 1929-era disclosure rules on insider trading, and Trevor’s real example of a near-retiree concentrated in two stocks despite claiming high confidence.
00:00 One Question Diligence
01:40 Skin In The Game
02:48 Quitting Social Media
05:31 Fund Manager Test
09:22 Eat Your Cooking
14:34 Buffett Deal Lesson
18:35 Limits Of Skin
19:56 Peace Child Setup
20:26 Judas and the Gospel
21:24 Peace Child Incentives
22:21 Advisor Skin in Game
23:42 Fiduciary vs Incentives
25:09 Taleb Fund Cycle
28:35 Do You Follow Advice
31:41 1929 Insider Reporting
35:06 Eating Own Cooking
35:39 Diversification Wake Up
38:04 Due Diligence Wrap
Links mentioned in this episode:
This week's blogpost - https://bahnsen.co/4sIiJ3H
On the Thoughts On Money Podcast, hosts Blaine Carver and Brett Bone Cutter talk with Director of Financial Planning Matt Gregory about his article “Room for Life,” inspired by running in New York City and Morgan Housel’s The Psychology of Money. Gregory explains the need to balance detailed modeling with the reality of uncertainty, using conservative assumptions (often planning to age 100) to create flexibility so plans can absorb pivots without falling apart. He shares his personal pivots from musical theater at NYU into finance, emphasizing that planning is both technical and relational storytelling. The discussion covers helping both technical and narrative-minded clients, avoiding “Armageddon” planning while building margin, using scenario ranges to provide clarity, and viewing the financial plan as a launchpad for tax, savings, and other decisions. They also stress estate planning as completing the picture—aligning assets with family and charitable goals and updating plans as life changes.
00:00 Podcast Welcome
00:37 Room for Life Origins
03:12 Matt’s Career Pivot
06:06 Storytelling in Planning
08:40 Different Client Mindsets
10:01 Room for Life Reframed
11:42 Expect the Unexpected
13:36 Optimism vs Pessimism
15:36 Three Scenario Planning
17:14 Clarity and Client Questions
19:29 Puzzle Framework for Plans
21:23 When Clients Resist Planning
22:32 Plans Spark Motivation
23:01 Planning Launchpad Topics
24:24 Fixing Fragile Plans
26:39 Budgeting Styles That Fit
28:05 False Precision Reality
30:30 Golf Shot Planning Analogy
31:47 Estate Planning Completes Plan
35:34 Evolving Estate Plans
39:05 Mortgage Planning Perspective
40:48 Advice Over Transactions
42:46 Final Takeaways Wrap
Links mentioned in this episode:
This week's blogpost - https://bahnsen.co/3PHCjiB
Host Trevor Cummings, with Brett Bonecutter and Blaine Carver, discusses whether Jesus’ teachings support socialism, prompted by Senator Raphael Warnock citing Matthew 25 in policy debates about poverty and healthcare. Brett argues socialism is often invoked as a moral claim and defines it as collective ownership and cooperative regulation to constrain private self-interest, then contends Jesus’ teachings and biblical law assume private and real property rights, voluntary exchange, merit-based reward, banking, and interest. They debate whether Jesus’ statements address individual heart posture versus prescribing systems, with Brett pointing to parables of landowners/tenants and the talents, and Jesus praising the widow’s offering, as incompatible with socialist ethics. The conversation emphasizes a “free and virtuous” society, personal responsibility and generosity as the Bible’s mechanism for caring for the poor, and invites listener feedback.
00:00 Welcome and premise
00:46 Holy Week motivation
01:32 Socialism in culture
02:36 Morality and Jesus
04:16 Why this matters
06:35 Warnock quote context
09:07 Defining socialism
11:00 Polls and capitalism label
13:19 Heart versus system
17:14 Parable property rights
20:04 Rich ruler nuance
22:29 Systemic assumptions
23:11 Systemic Lens Debate
24:16 Familiar Categories Not Endorsement
25:45 Parable of the Talents
29:50 Morality Envy and Greed
32:55 Acts Church and Coercion
35:54 Widows Mite and Charity
38:08 Was Jesus a Socialist
41:02 Too Big to Fail Tensions
43:41 Final Thoughts and Wrap
Links mentioned in this episode:
This week's blogpost - https://bahnsen.co/40YZ2Jj
Trevor Cummings hosts the Thoughts and Money Podcast with Brett and Blaine as they discuss Blaine’s article, “What Kind of Spending Makes Us Happy?” using stories about kids choosing purchases, trips to Disneyland and Chuck E. Cheese, and how adult spending often runs on autopilot amid frequent transactions and subscription costs. They contrast “happiness” with more lasting “joy,” describe how budgeting should start with the “why,” and note how recurring payments and social pressure can drive unexamined spending. Drawing on research and client observations, they highlight that giving (often producing a “warm glow”) and spending on experiences and relationships tend to bring more lasting satisfaction than material goods, while buying to impress others (the “man in the car” paradox) can disappoint. The episode ends with a call to reflect on what brings joy and align spending with personal values.
00:00 Podcast kickoff
00:28 Kids and money
01:38 Disney and Chuck E Cheese
02:51 Autopilot spending
03:58 Happiness versus joy
07:41 Budgeting with purpose
08:56 Subscription trap
12:21 Privilege and gratitude
14:16 Spending on experiences
18:11 What research shows
20:19 Joy of giving
22:34 Motives for Giving
23:02 Anonymous Giving Debate
24:42 Warm Glow Study
27:09 Giving as Money Habit
27:58 Spending on Experiences
30:33 Memory Dividends Mindset
32:19 Second Homes and Familiarity
35:22 Man in the Car Paradox
41:23 Hedonic Treadmill Trap
42:28 Align Spending with Values
44:24 Final Wrap and Call In
Links mentioned in this episode:
This week's blogpost - https://bahnsen.co/3PkPu91
Trevor Cummings hosts the Thoughts and Money podcast with Brett “Bone Cutter” and Blaine Carver to address recurring client fears about soaring U.S. national debt and whether “Debt-mageddon” is imminent. They clarify deficit vs. debt using a household analogy, explain how Treasury issuance funds deficits, and cite projected 2026 figures: ~$5.6T receipts vs. ~$7.4T spending, ~ $1.9T deficit, and over $1T of interest expense, with ~75% of spending mandatory. They note rates are historically low (mid-3% average vs. ~9.2% in 1986), meaning higher rates could bust the budget. Possible “solutions” (raise taxes, cut spending, grow out of it, lower rates) all have limits, so they expect a slow, Japanification-style grind rather than a sudden collapse. For investors, they caution against complacent indexing, long-duration bonds, crypto, and overreliance on gold, and emphasize durable, cash-flowing dividend-growth businesses and measuring opportunity cost.
00:00 Podcast Introductions
00:20 Debtmaggedon Setup
01:03 Apocalypse Pop Culture
03:41 Preppers And Planning
04:25 Five Key Questions
05:54 Deficit Versus Debt
07:47 How Government Borrows
11:42 Budget Math Reality
12:36 Interest Costs Squeeze
17:08 Debt Versus GDP Context
20:42 Is It Solvable
20:49 Raise Taxes Tradeoffs
23:18 Cut Spending Politics
23:51 Can We Grow Out
24:24 Can Government Cut Rates
25:51 Why Long Rates Are Market Set
26:44 No Magic Wand Fixes
27:34 Bell Curve Future Scenarios
29:23 Middle Path Japanification
30:23 Prepper Mindset And Paralysis
33:39 Markets Signal No Debt Bomb
34:55 Investor Playbook Starts Here
35:21 Beware Indexing And Bonds
39:33 Opportunity Cost Of Cash
43:05 Crypto And Gold Skepticism
45:30 Dividend Growth And Real Profits
47:58 Closing Jokes And Recap
Links mentioned in this episode:
This week's blogpost - https://bahnsen.co/4bFGcwT
Trevor Cummings hosts The Thoughts on Money Podcast with Brett Bonecutter and Blaine Carver to discuss “convictions over conformity,” arguing that shallow convictions lead investors to chase hot trends and abandon strategies when results turn. They contrast conformity/coercion with conviction by comparing Prohibition (a short-lived, legally forced attempt to curb alcoholism) with Alcoholics Anonymous (a long-lasting program rooted in personal responsibility and shared beliefs). The group emphasizes understanding the “why” behind an investment philosophy to avoid short-term decision-making, noting clients who engage intellectually are calmer during market stress. They discuss how strong convictions help filter product pitches and evaluate risk versus tax benefits. Trevor also shares uncertainty around legacy/estate planning, stressing communication, avoiding formulaic planning, and recognizing multi-generational impacts of wealth transfer.
00:00 Welcome and Setup
00:50 Why Conviction Matters
01:40 Conviction vs Conformity
03:54 Clients and Market Volatility
07:55 Prohibition as a Case Study
13:00 AA and Personal Responsibility
16:36 Start With Why
17:35 Staying True to Philosophy
20:24 Convictions Rooted in Truth
20:57 Grandma's Ham Parable
21:16 Ham Ends Parable
22:18 Why Beats What
23:34 AI Advice Pitfalls
24:28 Legacy Planning Uncertainty
27:05 Communication And Expectations
31:37 Advisor Role Boundaries
37:12 Gifting While Alive
38:44 Generational Ripple Effects
42:08 Fully Convinced Wrap Up
43:07 Ratings And Next Steps
Links mentioned in this episode:
This week's blogpost - https://bahnsen.co/47grFFj
Trevor Cummings hosts the Thoughts and Money Podcast with Brett Bonecutter and Blaine Carver, discussing his blog topic “Shortcuts, Head Starts and Changing Lanes.” After attending a conference job fair for aspiring financial advisors, they critique “fast track” career programs and argue against career and investing shortcuts, emphasizing foundation-building, patience, and willingness to do early “dirty work.” They compare shortcuts to chasing penny stocks, leverage, and persuasive pitches, noting investors’ susceptibility to FOMO, media narratives, and relative performance envy. They advocate “head starts” through early saving and compounding, citing a chart showing higher ending wealth from starting at 25 versus 35 despite lower total contributions. They warn against “changing lanes” in strategies, promote seeking “good returns, not best returns,” and stress having a durable investment philosophy, accountability, and discipline to avoid ruining long-built progress quickly.
00:00 Welcome and Banter
00:54 Conference Shortcut Pitch
02:24 Why the Long Cut Wins
05:44 Dirty Work and Foundations
08:08 Shortcuts in Life and Money
10:05 Smooth Is Fast Principle
12:01 Penny Stocks and Red Flags
13:56 Why We Chase Shortcuts
18:08 Head Starts Beat Catching Up
20:05 Compounding Chart Explained
21:26 Discipline and Real Life Costs
24:08 Don’t Disrupt Compounding
24:40 Can You Afford It
26:18 Credit Changes Everything
27:42 Changing Lanes Trap
29:36 Good Returns Mindset
31:30 Relative Returns FOMO
33:21 Shallow Convictions
34:31 Philosophy vs Institutions
39:49 Time Horizon Edge
42:34 Reputation and Shortcuts
43:54 Advisor as Accountability
45:13 Same as Ever Lessons
46:06 Overconfidence and Wrap Up
Links mentioned in this episode:
This week's blogpost - https://bahnsen.co/4rAtQvD
Trevor Cummings, hosting with a lost voice, interviews blog author Brett Bonecutter about his COVID-era entry into the options-trading subculture after being taught by a former bond trader. Brett describes early euphoric gains from a single strategy in a favorable market that led to confirmation bias, followed by significant losses when conditions changed and he wasn’t nimble enough to adapt, noting how traders often highlight winning trades while ignoring the full sample. They explain options as time-bound contracts to buy or sell an underlying asset (calls and puts), including how contracts themselves can be traded, and warn that complex combinations can create severe or even unlimited losses, citing a widely reported case of a confused young options trader who took his life and examples like meme-stock squeezes. They contrast investing vs speculating, critique overreliance on technical analysis, and conclude options are best for professional hedging, not retail “tinkering,” despite get-rich-quick allure.
00:00 Welcome and Setup
01:07 Subcultures and Finance
02:32 COVID Options Rabbit Hole
05:32 Highlight Reels and Bias
08:34 Big Wins Then Losses
10:25 Options Explained Simply
15:07 Derivatives and Real Danger
19:28 Casino vs Investing
21:42 Technical Analysis Debate
29:30 Selling Puts Insurance Analogy
35:56 Get Rich Quick Temptation
37:19 Final Warnings and Wrap
Links mentioned in this episode:
This week's blogpost - https://bahnsen.co/4tQ4xaA
Trevor Cummings hosts the Thoughts of Money Podcast with article author Blaine Carver and Brett Bonecutter, discussing Carver’s piece “Stock Market Expectations.” Using examples from relationships, premarital counseling, and sports fandom, they emphasize that expectations must be communicated early, clearly, and realistically to avoid disappointment, resentment, and poor decisions. They connect this to investing by explaining how stocks can fall even on good results when expectations are “priced to perfection,” why unrealistic return targets (e.g., 20–25% annually) break financial plans, and how compounding magnifies small percentage differences.
00:00 Welcome to the Thoughts on Money Podcast + Introducing Blaine & Brett
00:21 Under-Promise, Over-Deliver: Why Expectations Drive Everything
00:59 Vikings Season Story: Rock-Bottom Expectations → “Best” Year
02:05 From Football to Finance: Priced to Perfection & Pleasant Surprises
04:34 Expectations in Marriage (and Advisor-Client Relationships)
06:55 Unrealistic Return Targets: The 20% Conversation & Compounding Reality Check
10:39 Long-Run vs One-Year Thinking: Annual vs Annualized + Attribution
12:11 Strategy Whiplash: 2025 vs 2026 Reversal & Staying the Course
14:35 The Expectations Gap: Investors Want 12.6%, Advisors Model 7.1%
17:27 Why the Gap Exists: Valuations, History, and Risk Accountability (Bitcoin Example)
20:19 The “Road” Matters: Normal Drawdowns, Slow Recoveries, and the Bumpy Path
26:17 Coping Tools: Dividends, Business Fundamentals, and the 14% Intra-Year Drawdown
29:52 Optimists vs Pessimists: Experience, Confirmation Bias, and Fear of Running Out
37:37 Closing Reflections: Gratitude vs Grumbling + Final Thoughts & How to Reach Us
Links mentioned in this episode:
From the publisher's feed

8,581 Listeners

3,092 Listeners

1,535 Listeners

5,160 Listeners

4,879 Listeners

7,113 Listeners

583 Listeners

699 Listeners

2,040 Listeners

2,817 Listeners

643 Listeners

448 Listeners

26,554 Listeners