In this engaging episode of The Big Ten Huddle, hosts JR and Zach Guggenheim tackle the hotly debated 4+4+2+2+1 playoff format proposed by Big Ten Commissioner Tony Petitti, which grants four automatic bids each to the Big Ten and SEC, two each to the ACC and Big 12, and one to the top Group of Five champion, with three at-large bids. They discuss why this model, which includes intra-conference play-in games, has drawn opposition from the SEC, ACC, and Big 12 commissioners, who favor a 5+11 model with more at-large bids (06:06–08:14). JR and Zach argue that Petitti’s push for objectivity counters the subjective biases favoring SEC teams, like Alabama, in past playoffs (04:13–05:53). They also express concerns about unequal scheduling, particularly the SEC’s resistance to nine conference games, and how it impacts fairness (09:01–12:15).

The episode shifts to the newly released coaches poll, revealing Texas, Ohio State, Penn State, Georgia, and Notre Dame in the top five, with Indiana ranked 19th and Illinois at 12th (25:24–27:26). The hosts critique media biases, noting the SEC’s nine teams in the top 25 compared to the Big Ten’s six, and question overrated teams like LSU and Tennessee (27:27–33:38). They highlight Indiana’s undervaluation despite strong returning players and contrast it with Arizona State’s higher ranking due to a competitive playoff performance (34:57–36:36). The discussion wraps with excitement for upcoming football and plans for a future All-American team selection (37:06–39:45).

Useful Timestamps:

Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.