Transmission

As the electrification of heat increases and technologies like heat pump adoption grows, it's tempting to assume the gas network can simply be wound down street by street, in line with falling demand. But it’s not as simple as this: network topology, not customer count, decides when decommissioning is actually viable, and the UK gas network is nowhere close to that point today.

Sam Wilson, Director of Energy System Operations at Cadent, joins the podcast to explain the engineering reality behind that constraint — and how things like pressure control, storage, and gas injection all factor into it.

They cover:

• Why network topology, not customer count, decides when decommissioning is actually viable
• How gas goes from completely odourless at transmission pressure to detectable on your street.
• What it takes to step pressure down from around 90 bar in the transmission system, through off-takes and above ground installations, to roughly 30 millibars at a domestic appliance.
• How line packing turns the pipe network itself into short-duration storage, with operators raising or lowering in-pipe pressure to absorb daily demand swings.
• What's actually limiting how much biomethane and hydrogen can go into the network today, and why hydrogen can be blended in without any changes needed to downstream appliances.

Want to know how heat electrification could reshape power demand in GB? Ask Ko - Modo Energy’s AI energy analyst - sign up for free here

Transcript available here

You can watch or listen to new episodes every Tuesday. Transmission is a Modo Energy production. Your host is Ed Porter - Director EMEA & APAC at Modo Energy.

Chapters:

0:00 Introduction

1:09 What people get wrong about the gas network.

3:03 From gas field to home boiler: the full journey

4:33 UK's four gas distribution networks explained

5:15 Transmission pressure: 90 bar and above

6:25 Line packing - storing gas inside the pipes

7:55 Industrial vs domestic gas pressure needs

12:34 Replacing 100-year-old cast iron gas pipes

13:56 Biomethane in the gas network

17:15 Hydrogen blending: how much the network can take

21:22 Getting hydrogen to industrial gas users

23:18 Electrification vs the gas network's engineering reality

24:26 What happens when homes remove their gas connection

25:46 Why decommissioning the gas network isn't linear

31:57 Sam Wilson's contrarian take on the energy transition

Music licensed via Artlist.

🔔 Subscribe for more energy market analysis: / @modoenergy

🔗 Follow Modo Energy:

→ LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/modo-energy

→ Twitter/X: x.com/modoenergy

As the electrification of heat increases and technologies like heat pump adoption grows, it's tempting to assume the gas network can simply be wound down street by street, in line with falling demand. But it’s not as simple as this: network topology, not customer count, decides when decommissioning is actually viable, and the UK gas network is nowhere close to that point today.

Sam Wilson, Director of Energy System Operations at Cadent, joins the podcast to explain the engineering reality behind that constraint — and how things like pressure control, storage, and gas injection all factor into it.

They cover:

• Why network topology, not customer count, decides when decommissioning is actually viable
• How gas goes from completely odourless at transmission pressure to detectable on your street.
• What it takes to step pressure down from around 90 bar in the transmission system, through off-takes and above ground installations, to roughly 30 millibars at a domestic appliance.
• How line packing turns the pipe network itself into short-duration storage, with operators raising or lowering in-pipe pressure to absorb daily demand swings.
• What's actually limiting how much biomethane and hydrogen can go into the network today, and why hydrogen can be blended in without any changes needed to downstream appliances.

Want to know how heat electrification could reshape power demand in GB? Ask Ko - Modo Energy’s AI energy analyst - sign up for free here

Transcript available here

You can watch or listen to new episodes every Tuesday. Transmission is a Modo Energy production. Your host is Ed Porter - Director EMEA & APAC at Modo Energy.

Chapters:

0:00 Introduction

1:09 What people get wrong about the gas network.

3:03 From gas field to home boiler: the full journey

4:33 UK's four gas distribution networks explained

5:15 Transmission pressure: 90 bar and above

6:25 Line packing - storing gas inside the pipes

7:55 Industrial vs domestic gas pressure needs

12:34 Replacing 100-year-old cast iron gas pipes

13:56 Biomethane in the gas network

17:15 Hydrogen blending: how much the network can take

21:22 Getting hydrogen to industrial gas users

23:18 Electrification vs the gas network's engineering reality

24:26 What happens when homes remove their gas connection

25:46 Why decommissioning the gas network isn't linear

31:57 Sam Wilson's contrarian take on the energy transition

Music licensed via Artlist.

🔔 Subscribe for more energy market analysis: / @modoenergy

🔗 Follow Modo Energy:

→ LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/modo-energy

→ Twitter/X: x.com/modoenergy

The grid is swapping spinning turbines for grid forming inverters, and something is getting lost in the trade. A turbine could always throw 5 times its normal output to clear a fault, for free, using nothing but physics. Inverters can only manage around 1.5 times theirs. So if renewables are going to take over, where does that missing strength come from instead?

Ben Braun is Chief Engineer at Fluence, where he's spent his career working on power electronics - from batteries to the grid. In this episode, he breaks down grid forming vs grid following inverters for everyone without an electrical engineering degree.

They cover:

- Why "grid forming is slower" than grid following - and why that slower response is actually what makes it more stable in a fault.

- Why NESO in GB and AEMO in Australia are chasing completely different things from grid forming batteries.

- Why grid inertia disappears as spinning turbines retire, and how a sudden burst of power from a battery can fake it.

- Why volatile AI training loads are turning data centres into miniature grids of their own, and how batteries are used to stop that volatility ever reaching the wider network.

- Why Ben's biggest concern isn't too little fault current on the grid, but too much of it - and why that could force a wave of grid upgrades most people haven't priced in

Want to see which grids are paying for inertia and fault current today, or where the next stability tenders are opening? Ko, Modo Energy's AI analyst, is built for exactly these questions. Free sign up: https://modoenergy.com/product/ko?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=youtube&utm_campaign=ben_braun&utm_content=ko_signup

📄 Related article: [companion article link]

―――――――――――――――

⏱ CHAPTERS

―――――――――――――――

• 00:00 – Why the Grid Needs More Than Power Flow
• 01:31 – Grid Forming Inverters: Common Misconceptions
• 04:51 – Grid Forming vs Grid Following Speed Explained
• 07:16 – Bathtub Analogy for Grid Forming Batteries
• 11:44 – NESO Stability Pathfinder and Global Grid Forming Numbers
• 14:11 – AEMO's System Strength Charge Explained
• 16:28 – Inertia and Short Circuit Level for Beginners
• 17:10 – Grid Inertia Explained With Lorries and Cyclists
• 21:44 – How Batteries Replicate Grid Inertia
• 23:03 – Fault Current Basics: Fuses and Circuit Breakers
• 26:16 – Fault Current Math and Retiring Turbines
• 28:52 – Voltage Stiffness and System Strength
• 39:07 – Reactive Power Explained With a Circus Tent
• 42:23 – Black Start and Grid Restoration Explained
• 46:57 – Grid Forming Inverters for Data Centres
• 53:30 – Contrarian View: Too Much Fault Current
• 61:18 – Grid Upgrades for High Fault Current Levels

You can watch or listen to new episodes every Tuesday. Transmission is a Modo Energy production. Your host is Ed Porter - Director EMEA & APAC at Modo Energy.

Music licensed via Artlist.

🔔 Subscribe for more energy market analysis: / @modoenergy

🔗 Follow Modo Energy:

→ LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/modo-energy

→ Twitter/X: x.com/modoenergy

The grid is swapping spinning turbines for grid forming inverters, and something is getting lost in the trade. A turbine could always throw 5 times its normal output to clear a fault, for free, using nothing but physics. Inverters can only manage around 1.5 times theirs. So if renewables are going to take over, where does that missing strength come from instead?

Ben Braun is Chief Engineer at Fluence, where he's spent his career working on power electronics - from batteries to the grid. In this episode, he breaks down grid forming vs grid following inverters for everyone without an electrical engineering degree.

They cover:

- Why "grid forming is slower" than grid following - and why that slower response is actually what makes it more stable in a fault.

- Why NESO in GB and AEMO in Australia are chasing completely different things from grid forming batteries.

- Why grid inertia disappears as spinning turbines retire, and how a sudden burst of power from a battery can fake it.

- Why volatile AI training loads are turning data centres into miniature grids of their own, and how batteries are used to stop that volatility ever reaching the wider network.

- Why Ben's biggest concern isn't too little fault current on the grid, but too much of it - and why that could force a wave of grid upgrades most people haven't priced in

Want to see which grids are paying for inertia and fault current today, or where the next stability tenders are opening? Ko, Modo Energy's AI analyst, is built for exactly these questions. Free sign up: https://modoenergy.com/product/ko?utm_source=podcast&utm_medium=youtube&utm_campaign=ben_braun&utm_content=ko_signup

📄 Related article: [companion article link]

―――――――――――――――

⏱ CHAPTERS

―――――――――――――――

• 00:00 – Why the Grid Needs More Than Power Flow
• 01:31 – Grid Forming Inverters: Common Misconceptions
• 04:51 – Grid Forming vs Grid Following Speed Explained
• 07:16 – Bathtub Analogy for Grid Forming Batteries
• 11:44 – NESO Stability Pathfinder and Global Grid Forming Numbers
• 14:11 – AEMO's System Strength Charge Explained
• 16:28 – Inertia and Short Circuit Level for Beginners
• 17:10 – Grid Inertia Explained With Lorries and Cyclists
• 21:44 – How Batteries Replicate Grid Inertia
• 23:03 – Fault Current Basics: Fuses and Circuit Breakers
• 26:16 – Fault Current Math and Retiring Turbines
• 28:52 – Voltage Stiffness and System Strength
• 39:07 – Reactive Power Explained With a Circus Tent
• 42:23 – Black Start and Grid Restoration Explained
• 46:57 – Grid Forming Inverters for Data Centres
• 53:30 – Contrarian View: Too Much Fault Current
• 61:18 – Grid Upgrades for High Fault Current Levels

You can watch or listen to new episodes every Tuesday. Transmission is a Modo Energy production. Your host is Ed Porter - Director EMEA & APAC at Modo Energy.

Music licensed via Artlist.

🔔 Subscribe for more energy market analysis: / @modoenergy

🔗 Follow Modo Energy:

→ LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/modo-energy

→ Twitter/X: x.com/modoenergy

Joe McDonald says close to 30% of a business power bill can go to trading desks, balancing costs and wholesale market fees most customers never see. Behind suppliers can sit five or six more intermediaries, each taking a cut before the energy ever arrives. Is that a market working as designed, or one taking more than it should?

Joe is Founder & CEO of Tem Energy, and has spent over a decade inside the middle of the energy market, watching where the money actually goes on its way to the meter. He's now building the AI infrastructure to strip those middlemen out of the chain, with Tem already transacting over £1 billion a year across thousands of UK businesses, backed by a fresh Series B to fund expansion into Texas and Australia.

They cover:

• Why up to 30% of a business energy bill can go to trading desks, balancing costs and wholesale fees layered behind the supplier.
• How forward market contracts fix energy prices for months or years and why "shape matching" between generators and buyers creates a shadow market worth billions.
• The P442 grid charging exemption, and why a change this small took two years to push through.
• Why Joe believes Tem's AI agents could remove around 90% of labor costs in energy transactions, and why he sees that trade-off as necessary.
• Tem Energy's plan after its Series B - expanding into Texas and Australia before Europe and the case for energy AI becoming the UK's next trillion-dollar industry.

Want to dig deeper into where that 30% actually goes, or how forward contracts are priced? Ask Ko, Modo Energy's AI analyst, for free sign up also gets you trial access to Modo Energy's research.

You can watch or listen to new episodes every Tuesday. Transmission is a Modo Energy production. Your host is Ed Porter - Director EMEA & APAC at Modo Energy.

Chapters:

0:00 Introduction

1:24 The Real Cost Layers Behind A Business Energy Bill

3:17 The Mechanics Of Forward Energy Contracts

5:25 Shape Matching Explained

6:35 The Shadow Market Behind The Grid

11:12 Pricing And Settling Energy Trades With AI

26:46 The P442 Grid Charging Exemption

36:29 The Slow Pace Of Energy Market Regulation

37:37 The Same Problem Across Global Energy Markets

38:36 Cutting Utility Operating Costs With AI

39:22 Comparing This Model To Octopus And Kraken

40:40 Joe McDonald's Contrarian View On Energy Markets

41:34 Cutting 90% Of Energy Labor Costs With AI

Joe McDonald says close to 30% of a business power bill can go to trading desks, balancing costs and wholesale market fees most customers never see. Behind suppliers can sit five or six more intermediaries, each taking a cut before the energy ever arrives. Is that a market working as designed, or one taking more than it should?

Joe is Founder & CEO of Tem Energy, and has spent over a decade inside the middle of the energy market, watching where the money actually goes on its way to the meter. He's now building the AI infrastructure to strip those middlemen out of the chain, with Tem already transacting over £1 billion a year across thousands of UK businesses, backed by a fresh Series B to fund expansion into Texas and Australia.

They cover:

• Why up to 30% of a business energy bill can go to trading desks, balancing costs and wholesale fees layered behind the supplier.
• How forward market contracts fix energy prices for months or years and why "shape matching" between generators and buyers creates a shadow market worth billions.
• The P442 grid charging exemption, and why a change this small took two years to push through.
• Why Joe believes Tem's AI agents could remove around 90% of labor costs in energy transactions, and why he sees that trade-off as necessary.
• Tem Energy's plan after its Series B - expanding into Texas and Australia before Europe and the case for energy AI becoming the UK's next trillion-dollar industry.

Want to dig deeper into where that 30% actually goes, or how forward contracts are priced? Ask Ko, Modo Energy's AI analyst, for free sign up also gets you trial access to Modo Energy's research.

You can watch or listen to new episodes every Tuesday. Transmission is a Modo Energy production. Your host is Ed Porter - Director EMEA & APAC at Modo Energy.

Chapters:

0:00 Introduction

1:24 The Real Cost Layers Behind A Business Energy Bill

3:17 The Mechanics Of Forward Energy Contracts

5:25 Shape Matching Explained

6:35 The Shadow Market Behind The Grid

11:12 Pricing And Settling Energy Trades With AI

26:46 The P442 Grid Charging Exemption

36:29 The Slow Pace Of Energy Market Regulation

37:37 The Same Problem Across Global Energy Markets

38:36 Cutting Utility Operating Costs With AI

39:22 Comparing This Model To Octopus And Kraken

40:40 Joe McDonald's Contrarian View On Energy Markets

41:34 Cutting 90% Of Energy Labor Costs With AI

Battery storage went from an unproven bet to one of Europe's fastest-growing energy assets in a but the exceptional returns early investors saw have already faded as more batteries crowd the market. The real question today isn't whether a battery can make money, it's whether an optimiser can keep making money from it, market after market, year after year.

In this conversation, Brecht Dierckx, Director of Physical Asset Trading & Optimisation at Centrica, joins Ed to unpack what actually separates a good battery optimiser from an average one, and why pricing, contracts and risk are becoming as important as trading itself.

They cover:

- Why the exceptional early returns 2017–2018 battery investors saw are gone for good, and what actually lets some optimisers keep repeating strong performance while others can't

- How battery revenue has shifted over time — from grid-support services, to adjusting trades as markets move, to buying and selling across multiple markets at once — and why each edge shrinks as more batteries chase it

- Why pricing a battery deal is nothing like pricing a financial instrument, and how modelling different future scenarios (rather than simple averages) reveals the real value of holding a diversified portfolio

- What project developers are actually asking optimisers for now — performance guarantees, profit shares, protection from regulatory changes — and why some of those guarantees aren't realistically workable

- Which European markets look most promising for battery growth next, and how emerging grid restrictions could shape how much value new assets are able to capture

Want to know how flexible connection agreements or grid restrictions are changing your battery's revenue forecast? Ask Ko, Modo Energy's AI analyst

Chapters:

0:00 – Battery Storage Returns Are Saturating

1:04 – Battery Optimisation Operational Excellence

2:22 – Repeatable Battery Storage Returns

5:43 – Ancillary Services Revenue Saturation

8:14 – Battery Optimiser Performance Benchmarks

10:08 – Small Vs Large Battery Trading Teams

14:25 – AI In Energy Trading

16:29 – Autonomous AI Battery Trading Risks

18:40 – Extreme Weather Impact On Energy Trading

21:49 – Best European Battery Storage Markets

24:13 – Battery Storage Toll Pricing

28:59 – Battery Portfolio Diversification Strategy

31:36 – Flexible Connection Agreements Explained

35:51 – Battery Storage Investment Guarantees

38:30 – Battery Storage And Grid Transmission

Battery storage went from an unproven bet to one of Europe's fastest-growing energy assets in a but the exceptional returns early investors saw have already faded as more batteries crowd the market. The real question today isn't whether a battery can make money, it's whether an optimiser can keep making money from it, market after market, year after year.

In this conversation, Brecht Dierckx, Director of Physical Asset Trading & Optimisation at Centrica, joins Ed to unpack what actually separates a good battery optimiser from an average one, and why pricing, contracts and risk are becoming as important as trading itself.

They cover:

- Why the exceptional early returns 2017–2018 battery investors saw are gone for good, and what actually lets some optimisers keep repeating strong performance while others can't

- How battery revenue has shifted over time — from grid-support services, to adjusting trades as markets move, to buying and selling across multiple markets at once — and why each edge shrinks as more batteries chase it

- Why pricing a battery deal is nothing like pricing a financial instrument, and how modelling different future scenarios (rather than simple averages) reveals the real value of holding a diversified portfolio

- What project developers are actually asking optimisers for now — performance guarantees, profit shares, protection from regulatory changes — and why some of those guarantees aren't realistically workable

- Which European markets look most promising for battery growth next, and how emerging grid restrictions could shape how much value new assets are able to capture

Want to know how flexible connection agreements or grid restrictions are changing your battery's revenue forecast? Ask Ko, Modo Energy's AI analyst

Chapters:

0:00 – Battery Storage Returns Are Saturating

1:04 – Battery Optimisation Operational Excellence

2:22 – Repeatable Battery Storage Returns

5:43 – Ancillary Services Revenue Saturation

8:14 – Battery Optimiser Performance Benchmarks

10:08 – Small Vs Large Battery Trading Teams

14:25 – AI In Energy Trading

16:29 – Autonomous AI Battery Trading Risks

18:40 – Extreme Weather Impact On Energy Trading

21:49 – Best European Battery Storage Markets

24:13 – Battery Storage Toll Pricing

28:59 – Battery Portfolio Diversification Strategy

31:36 – Flexible Connection Agreements Explained

35:51 – Battery Storage Investment Guarantees

38:30 – Battery Storage And Grid Transmission

This summer, Britain recorded its first ever four consecutive months of 35°C+ heat and according to the Climate Change Committee, the UK isn't ready for it, physically or emotionally. As political pressure mounts in the net zero debate over whether Britain should slow its climate transition, the CCC's chief executive makes the case that affordability and climate action are the same fight, not competing priorities.

Ed sits down with Emma Pinchbeck, Chief Executive of the Climate Change Committee (CCC), to find out what preparing for a hotter Britain actually looks like, and why extreme heat has quietly overtaken flooding as the institution's top adaptation concern.

They cover:

• Why extreme heat is now one of the CCC's top adaptation recommendations, with up to 92% of UK homes at risk of overheating by 2050.

• How solar and battery storage naturally track cooling demand, and why that strengthens the case for air conditioning becoming standard in UK homes.
• Emma’s case for accelerating rather than easing off decarbonisation, including data showing EV- and solar-equipped homes can save up to £1,900 a year on energy costs.
• Why UK electricity is priced roughly 4x higher than gas, well above the 2:1 ratio in countries that have successfully rolled out heat pumps.
• Why Emma argues cost-of-living and climate policy are "the same question," not competing priorities.

Want to know why UK electricity prices are 4x higher than gas, and how that compares to countries where heat pumps have taken off? Ask Ko, Modo Energy's AI Analyst, for the market-by-market breakdown. Try Ko for free

Transcript available here:

Chapters:

0:00 Britain's Record-Breaking Heat

1:16 The CCC's Real Role vs. Government Policy

2:55 The Net Zero Speed Debate: Science and Political Pressure

4:38 Electrification and Household Energy Savings

9:55 Why UK Electricity Costs Four Times More Than Gas

12:57 Extreme Heat and the Case for Home Cooling

15:47 Solar, Batteries, and the Summer Cooling Demand Curve

17:34 Gas as a Strategic Reserve for Grid Security

22:43 The True Cost of Net Zero: £6.9 Trillion in Investment

25:20 Financing the Transition: Levies and Smoothing Costs

29:05 Why Demand Matters More Than Supply

31:03 Industrial Policy: Grangemouth, Port Talbot, and Manufacturing

35:27 Emma's Contrarian View: Cost and Climate as One Question

38:28 Closing Thoughts and Sign-Off

Music licensed via Artlist.

🔔 Subscribe for more energy market analysis: / @modoenergy

🔗 Follow Modo Energy:

→ LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/modo-energy

This summer, Britain recorded its first ever four consecutive months of 35°C+ heat and according to the Climate Change Committee, the UK isn't ready for it, physically or emotionally. As political pressure mounts in the net zero debate over whether Britain should slow its climate transition, the CCC's chief executive makes the case that affordability and climate action are the same fight, not competing priorities.

Ed sits down with Emma Pinchbeck, Chief Executive of the Climate Change Committee (CCC), to find out what preparing for a hotter Britain actually looks like, and why extreme heat has quietly overtaken flooding as the institution's top adaptation concern.

They cover:

• Why extreme heat is now one of the CCC's top adaptation recommendations, with up to 92% of UK homes at risk of overheating by 2050.
• How solar and battery storage naturally track cooling demand, and why that strengthens the case for air conditioning becoming standard in UK homes.
• Emma’s case for accelerating rather than easing off decarbonisation, including data showing EV- and solar-equipped homes can save up to £1,900 a year on energy costs.
• Why UK electricity is priced roughly 4x higher than gas, well above the 2:1 ratio in countries that have successfully rolled out heat pumps.
• Why Emma argues cost-of-living and climate policy are "the same question," not competing priorities.

Want to know why UK electricity prices are 4x higher than gas, and how that compares to countries where heat pumps have taken off? Ask Ko, Modo Energy's AI Analyst, for the market-by-market breakdown. Try Ko for free

Transcript available here:

Chapters:

0:00 Britain's Record-Breaking Heat

1:16 The CCC's Real Role vs. Government Policy

2:55 The Net Zero Speed Debate: Science and Political Pressure

4:38 Electrification and Household Energy Savings

9:55 Why UK Electricity Costs Four Times More Than Gas

12:57 Extreme Heat and the Case for Home Cooling

15:47 Solar, Batteries, and the Summer Cooling Demand Curve

17:34 Gas as a Strategic Reserve for Grid Security

22:43 The True Cost of Net Zero: £6.9 Trillion in Investment

25:20 Financing the Transition: Levies and Smoothing Costs

29:05 Why Demand Matters More Than Supply

31:03 Industrial Policy: Grangemouth, Port Talbot, and Manufacturing

35:27 Emma's Contrarian View: Cost and Climate as One Question

38:28 Closing Thoughts and Sign-Off

Music licensed via Artlist.

🔔 Subscribe for more energy market analysis: / @modoenergy

🔗 Follow Modo Energy:

→ LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/modo-energy

→ Twitter/X: x.com/modoenergy