Wealth Formula Podcast

If you read the title of this email and felt a little weird about it, I think that's pretty normal. It was intended to get a reaction out of everyone. For those who believe in giving for the purpose of being a good person, it might disgust you to think of adulterating your good deeds. If you are less charitable minded, it gave you good reason to read further rather than delete an email about giving your hard earned money away. The truth is that charitable giving is complicated. For those who have done much of it, you know there is a benefit to you that you understand yourself, but is a little hard to explain. You see, several scientific studies have shown that giving money to charity makes you a happier person. In that regard, charity is not entirely charitable. In exchange for a monetary gift, you are getting a psychological boost— a return of happiness so to speak. Of course giving can have a financial benefit as well. You get a tax deduction every time you give and, if you give enough, you can even drive yourself down to a lower tax bracket and potentially come out even. That's very basic charitable giving economics. But obviously there are a lot more levels of complexity used by the ultra-wealthy for tax and social benefit. You have already seen leveraged charitable giving in the form of conservation easements although they certainly are not without controversy. That has not stopped the likes of Ted Turner and Donald Trump from utilizing them. Charity, as it turns out, has its own complexity when it comes to higher level personal finance. You have probably heard of things like charitable remainder trusts and other vehicles used by the ultrawealthy to legally avoid estate taxes. These strategies are complicated for sure and I can't say that I really understand them. However, they are also really powerful and worth knowing about because they may very well begin applying to you before you know it if you are participating in our Investor Club offerings! For that reason, I invited Jerry Borrowman on Wealth Formula Podcast this week. Jerry is one of those guys who really understands the nuances of all of this stuff. That's more than I can say for 99 percent of the advisers out there—even the ones who deal with the ultra wealthy. If you want to understand how estate taxes can become legally optional and actually leave more money to your children by giving money away, don't miss this episode. Buck P.S. I asked Rod from Wealth Formula Banking to help me with the interview. If you have any questions about this interview, reach out to him at [email protected]

Where are you today? Where do you want to be? Based on what you are doing right now, is there any chance that you are going to get there? Those are questions that I ask myself frequently—especially when I feel like I'm in a rut. Why is it important? Well, for those of us who are fortunate enough not to have the burden of worrying about where our next meal will come from, we have the opportunity to create our own destinies. But the fact that we don't have to hustle anymore also increases the likelihood that we go on auto-pilot and live a life of abundant mediocrity. If you don't care for more than that, more power to you. However, if where you are today does not match where you want to be, make sure you do something about it. If you want to win the lottery, you have to at least buy a lottery ticket! In my case, I would like the opportunity to influence the thinking of more professionals like you. I've done pretty darn well this year and it would be easy for me to sit on my laurels and congratulate myself in hopes of simply repeating my success in 2020. However, simply repeating the success I had in 2019 is not what I wish to to do. In order to get where I want to be, I need to touch more people. I am a firm believer in the words of Zig Ziglar, "You can get everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want". So the question I need to be asking myself is whether I am putting myself in a position to maximize how many more people I draw into our Wealth Formula Community. I need to make sure that I give myself the best chance to grow the brand and to spread its message. How about you? What are your goals? Maybe you want to add a zero to your net worth. If that's the case, can you get there just by doing what you are doing now or do you need to actively change your facts? What is it that you need to do? The people who do the most in this world do it by design. Very few people accidentally get rich. Professional athletes and entertainers work their asses off at their craft before they become rich and famous. People who get rich from their investments do so by investing in things that could possibly make them rich! Stocks, bonds and mutual funds are not going to make you rich. Listen, I'm not here to tell you that you have to change your life. I just want you to make sure that you are not moving through life like a zombie and regret that you didn't at least put yourself in a position where achieving your dreams was even possible. Remember—you can't win the lottery if you don't buy a ticket. Being a physician, dentist or engineer does not define you. You define yourself with your own efforts. My guest on Wealth Formula Podcast this week is a great example of that. David Phelps started focusing on real estate during dental school and went on to become a major influencer for his colleagues in personal finance. When people think of David, they don't think dentist, they think financial freedom. He is a great example of someone who has taken his destiny into his own hands despite coming from a typical professional background. You definitely want to hear what David has to say.

I'm a doctor, but Wealth Formula is not a doctor podcast. Sure, probably 30-40 percent of my Accredited Investor Club is made up of physicians and dentists, but that just happens to be the byproduct of my own professional past. People with common background tend to flock together I guess. That's fine with me. I love working with other health-care types but I don't ever want to approach them cold. You see, when I first set out to do this show, I was going to make it about doctors. It made sense to carve out that niche since, at the time, no one was really filling the vacuum. In the end, what kept me away from a doctor show was that most physicians are too difficult to convince of anything other than conventional financial wisdom and other bad ideas. The voices that have emerged as influencers for doctors now talk of ETFs and "living like a resident", which of course is at odds with my real asset, abundance focused approach. Back when I lived in Chicago, I tried to reach out to some doctors locally a few times. One of my neighbors was a neurosurgeon making millions of dollars per year who was dumping his money into a financial advisor like everyone else and his idea of alternative assets was investing in medical device companies that would randomly solicit him at his office or in the operating room. Not to be too negative about medical device opportunities, however, I have never seen a doctor invest in a medical device and make the millions he typically anticipates. Why? Well, a good idea only goes so far. You have to have a demand for the product and a very good team implementing that plan. And while those great opportunities do exist, most individual doctors never see them because smart investors and venture capital get to them first. Most medical device startups come to doctors when they are pretty much busts to begin with and after everyone else has said no. But that's your typical doctor investing—send it to the wealth advisor or spend it on an idea that will never take off. It's painful to watch but even more painful to try to intervene. So now, I just work with the doctors, who along with everyone else in my network, find me and who are open to another approach to personal finance. I should point out that, as I've said before, I don't think it's a bad thing to invest in high risk high reward type investments with a small portion of ones portfolio. However, there is a smart way to do that as well. You still need to dig into the information that is available and be smart about your allocations. It is even smarter if you come at it as a team. Venture capital is certainly one approach to asymmetric risk that is worth considering. If you find the right group with whom to invest, you might have an opportunity to achieve considerable returns on an asymmetric risk fund. The idea there is that you put your money in competent hands to spread over multiple opportunities. Some of them might go bust and some might result in 5x-10x outcomes. I personally have not invested in any venture capital myself, but I would do that before I ever considered investing in a medical device company that came knocking at my door. Even asymmetric risk has strategy to it that can optimize outcomes. To help us learn about venture capital and to see if it might be right for you, this week's Wealth Formula Podcast features Vanessa Bartram of Zora Ventures. P.S. - If you are interested in learning more about ZORA and investing in Israeli tech, click HERE to sign up for a webinar they are hosting on Tuesday, October 22nd from 12-1pm EST.

I am in a financial position that may seem somewhat unusual to you. You see, the IRS rewards me for my real estate investments by taxing me less. If, on the other hand, I keep my income in the bank, or invest it in traditional equities or bonds, the IRS shows me no mercy! Admittedly this is by design. I am a real estate professional. One of the great benefits to that designation is that all of my passive losses flow through my personal tax returns. In other words, all that depreciation and mortgage interest I get by investing in real estate not only builds my net worth, but SAVES me money in the form of tax mitigation. Not a bad deal right? To illustrate the power of these completely legal tax advantages, remember that with bonus depreciation even limited partners often end up with K1 losses of 50-100 percent of invested capital. Those losses add up in a hurry! With that perspective in mind, why would I EVER consider investing in anything that is not tax advantaged? Think about the returns I would need to get in order to simply break even with the tax breaks I'm getting from investing in real estate. The returns would need to be HUGE. I'm not going to get that through Vanguard ETFs! In fact, I truly believe that the only way I can get higher tax equivalent returns on capital is by investing in asymmetric risk type investments. For me, that means a little bit of bitcoin. You may think I am crazy, but I actually don't even consider investing in bitcoin all that risky. Sure it's volatile, but I'm pretty darn sure that 5 years down the line anyone who buys bitcoin today will be pretty happy. I'm less sure about all of the alternative coins/tokens. They may have more explosive returns or they may simply go to zero. But bitcoin going to zero?—ain't going to happen if you ask me. Now I don't overdo it with my bitcoin portfolio. For one, it's important to have discipline and value add real estate is my bread and butter. In fact, I bought bitcoin with only about 5 percent of my investable assets this year. Aside from its riskier nature, buying bitcoin does not save me any money! It's not tax advantaged. So what's a bitcoin HODLR to do? How about "Buy, borrow, and die"? That's the mantra of the ultra-wealthy. The idea is that you can borrow against most assets that you own and invest in something else. You don't get taxed on your loan and you've got a way to create liquidity out of an asset that is sitting around waiting to appreciate. If you invest those borrowed funds into real estate, not only do you get the benefit of investing your capital in two places at once, but you also get the tax advantages! You can do this with all kinds of assets. Traditionally, the wealthy have done this with brokerage accounts and other real estate but also with gold and fine art. The good news is that these days you can even do it with bitcoin and that's what this week's show is all about. Zac Prince is the founder of a cutting edge company called BlockFi. BlockFi is essentially creating financial products from the cryptocurrency ecosystem including the origination of loans and even savings accounts that pay cryptocurrency in interest. In this week's Wealth Formula Podcast, Zac tells us all about it and gives us his take on the massive infrastructure that is creeping slowly but surely into the bitcoin ecosystem. Whether or not you buy bitcoin, you are going to want to understand what's going on in the digital ecosystem because soon it will be part of your every day reality. Don't miss this show!

Have you heard of the 4 percent rule? I'm guessing you have as it seems to be some magical number espoused by traditional financial advisors and bloggers alike. The idea is that you should safely be able to withdraw 4 percent of your portfolio to live on for retirement. Theoretically the 4 percent is based on the idea that, over time, portfolio yield should outperform 4 percent and result in principal preservation. Is it really that simple? Maybe it is. Maybe that's all you need to do and it will work out for you. As you may have guessed, I'm more than a little skeptical of the rule myself. Why? Well, for one thing, I'm a real estate guy. I like income producing assets with tax benefits that I can see, touch and feel. Admittedly, that's just my bias. The bigger problem with the 4 percent rule is that it is based on old data. Specifically, the modeling uses data from 1926 to 1976. To me, that's a little concerning. You see, the underlying assumptions of the 4 percent rule are that most of the most of the portfolio income is produced from dividends and fixed income. What is fixed income? Fixed income comes from bonds of course and bond yields are reflective of interest rates. I don't need to remind you that we are at historical low interest rate levels now and our president is advocating for negative rates. How does that make you feel about the 4 percent rule now? It makes me very concerned for my high-paid professional colleagues—doctors, lawyers and engineers who are following the 4 percent paradigm like it is religion. While it may work out, it sure doesn't sound like a risk that I would want to take. We live in unparalleled times. How in the world can we use hundred year old data to guide us into retirement? No way I'm doing that. But the problem is that most of our colleagues will and all we can do is watch them like an accident ready to happen, hoping they will survive. In the meantime, we need to continue to educate ourselves. Financial education is our best weapon defense against going broke. In line with that, my guest on Wealth Formula Podcast today is an author and educator that I have invited to teach us about the biggest financial sector on earth: the bond market. Without understanding the bond market, you cannot understand the economy. Don't miss this interview!

I am a simple guy. When I bowl, I throw the ball right down the middle of the lane. I couldn't put any spin on it if I tried. My thinking is equally simple. In order for me to understand things, I have to break them down into smaller, easier to digest bites or I won't understand. When I tell people that, they think I am joking. How does a guy who spent time as a brain surgeon call himself simple? Well, I am telling you the truth. I thrive on simplicity—by connecting a series of lines from point A to point B. If I can connect all the dots, I will get it and, in fact, I will be able to explain it to someone else so they understand it as well. If anything, that is my superpower. But I don't like complexity. Too many moving parts means too many chances for error. So, whenever something looks a little different than what I am used to, it makes me nervous. Agricultural investing is one of those things that I don't know much about. In theory, it sounds like a good idea. People have to eat, right? Investing over-seas?…I've done it before and I probably will never do it again. I like predictability. And, you can say a lot of negative things about the US, but it is still a land ruled by law and a government that will not be overthrown anytime soon. If someone screws you over, there is a good chance you will get retribution. It's good to be an American investing in the United States. That said, I also have an open mind so I like to talk to people about things that I don't understand or inherently feel comfortable about. After all, there was a time that I didn't really understand multifamily real estate. Since then, I have pretty much bet my life on multifamily real estate and, while many uncertainties in life make me uneasy, my real estate investments do not. Real estate in the United States is what I know, but living in a bubble is not good either. Therefore, I make an effort to constantly listen to new things and, as a result, have changed my mind more than once and fine tuned my own investing philosophy. So, this week's show is going to explore something I know nothing about: agricultural investing in Paraguay. Is it right for you? To find out, listen to this week's Wealth Formula Podcast.

There is clearly fear in the heart of investors in the equity markets and real estate alike as talk of trade wars and recessions abound. Meanwhile, I'm investing more in multifamily real estate this year than I ever have. In fact, I'm investing my 80 year old dad's money in the same offerings—the opportunities everyone sees in Investor Club! So why would I do this? Well, lots of reasons. Here are just a few: 1. I can't time the market. The podcast echo chamber has been warning of the impending zombie apocalypse for at least 4 years now. Since then, I have been in and out of multiple deals creating permanent wealth. If we do have a recession (which I don't doubt), does it have to be a blood bath? Remember, the average length between recessions is 5.5 years. If you enter an investment today, you could very well be back at the top of the cycle by the time you are ready to sell. 2. I only invest in quality assets that are in quality markets. What does that mean? Well, I like multifamily real estate located in high growth areas. If there is strong growth in population and in jobs organically today, then there is no reason that demographic trend shouldn't continue with or without a recession over the long term. That means a lot of people needing to live somewhere and multifamily real estate solves that problem. While it may be the case that my returns slow down for a year or two if rent growth slows, if I invest in quality assets in quality areas, I don't worry too much about it. I don't believe I will lose money. 3. What makes me so confident that I won't lose money? Well, the basic thesis of my investing is to not buy and hope. For those in INVESTOR CLUB, you know that I am a believer in forcing equity through value-add strategies. That means we are dynamically decompressing our own property cap rates and giving ourselves a bigger cushion in the event of any slow-down. We create value from day one and that's why our multifamily investment returns have averaged 30 percent annualized over the last 6 years—way above proforma's. If a downturn happens, we have a big cushion! 4. I believe in the volume averaging approach. This goes back to the fact that I cannot predict market cycles. I prefer potentially less growth and capital preservation during a recession (real estate) over negative growth or losing money (money in the bank or stock market). As long as I invest in the right deals with the right operators, I just keep deploying capital on a regular basis. The ups and downs of the market cycles will take care of themselves. 5. The longer I'm in the investing game, the more I'm convinced it has more to do with the team than the asset itself. Right now, I have operators that I trust that make it very easy for me to deploy capital and that is the BIGGEST reason I am investing so much in real estate NOW. Even if there is an economic downturn, I'm in a very safe position with an extremely competent team. In fact, we will continue to buy through any potential downturn and follow it all the way back up! Do I sound too optimistic? I would say I'm being realistic. Understand that, although I won't be surprised to see a downturn in the next 12 months or so, I believe the next decade will be the "roaring 20s"—just like the ITR economics guys told us in a previous podcast. I don't want to miss any of that! That said, I'm always listening to what economists and other experts have to say. In fact, on this week's Wealth Formula Podcast, I have a highly respected economist who specializes in multifamily real estate. His name is Ryan Davis and he definitely knows what he's talking about so make sure to tune in!

Up to 10 percent of my liquid assets are in very risky stuff—specifically digital assets and startups. A lot of people people think I am being irresponsible—particularly because I have a captive audience with whom I have influence. Now if I was shooting at the hip and telling you to put all your money in this stuff, I would understand. But even highly volatile investments (ie. gambling) may have their role in your portfolio. To be clear, every year, I allocate no less than 80 percent of the money I invest into real estate through Investor Club. There are many "wealth advisors" out there who would tell me that's nuts too—that I would be better with a substantial portfolio of stocks, bonds, and mutual funds. Ain't gonna happen. One of the great benefits of becoming financially literate is that you get to make your own decisions and feel confident about them. You don't need someone with a three month long accreditation course to tell you what makes sense. In my opinion, residential real estate isn't risky if you know what you are doing or invest with someone who does. People have to live somewhere regardless of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Real estate in the hands of an ambitious immigrant with no money (my dad), ultimately paid for my upper middle-class upbringing and my education through medical school! Why would I consider it risky? The only time my dad got in trouble was when he invested in the stock market. Now, let's go back to this buying digital currency thing again. You and I know this is seriously risky. But you know what?— a lot of people have gotten very wealthy off this stuff already and it's still in its early days. So let me ask you this. Say you invested $20K into a variety of cryptocurrency projects today and lost it all. Would that kill you? Alternatively, say your $20K became $2 million—is it worth it for you to at least have a chance of this happening in your lifetime? That's the kind of analysis you need to do for yourself when considering investments of the asymmetric risk profile variety. Chances are if you are a follower of Wealth Formula Podcast, you are already doing fine. You make a great income and have all the basic things you need to live a happy life. But what if you had exposure to something that could put you in another league of wealth entirely? Would it be worth putting a little capital at risk to make this happen? It is for me and that is why I invest in cryptocurrency. This is not foolish—this is calculated risk. It is the kind of risk that the wealthy take all the time. It's how millionaires become billionaires and how ordinary people can make money that they never imagined possible. In fact, even the largest, most respected university endowments like Yale and Stanford are getting in the game with small allocations in the digital currency space just to make sure they don't miss out. And why now? Well—because no one is talking about it. The bull market of 2017 had everyone and their mother investing in cryptocurrencies. Two years later, technology is better and institutional money is starting to get in, but investors don't seem that interested. That's exactly why, if you have not gotten exposure to digital assets, now may be the best time to take the leap. The more you read about this stuff, the more excited you will get! To help you understand what is going on with cryptocurrency and whether you should consider getting into the game, I invited Teeka Tiwari back on Wealth Formula Podcast. He's a former Wall Street guy with serious credibility with institutional investors and family offices. He is also a great teacher so make sure you tune into this week's show. P.S. To find out EXACTLY why investing in cryptocurrency makes sense NOW, make sure to sign up for Teeka's upcoming webinar HERE.

Last week I was in Monterrey for car week. While I still drive my Toyota Prius from 2008 that I purchased during my final surgical residency year, I have an appreciation for vintage Italian cars so I attended the annual Concorso Italiano. Those old Ferrari's are beautiful! There was a particularly stunning silver 1973 Ferrari Dino that I couldn't get out of my mind. There is a guy at my YMCA who drives a Dino (only in Montecito)—he bought it brand new in 1975! I was telling him about the event and, as it turned out, he was there too. "Yeah—but Dino's are slow," he said. "If I buy a new car, it's going to be a Tesla. Those things are crazy fast!" "But Tesla's have no soul!" I argued. To me we were talking about two different things. He was talking about performance, and I was talking about art. Now, I'm not much of an art guy but I think my love for old Ferrari's is much more inline with an art critic's love of Andy Warhol rather then a guy who just wants a fast car. I could care less if that Ferrari is slow. I just want to appreciate it for what it is. It's a sensory masterpiece. Look at it. Listen to it! Tesla's are silent and damn ugly in my opinion—especially that SUV. It looks like an overgrown Prius. Now why did I go to this car show anyway? Just to torture myself with envy? No… I've been thinking about buying my first vintage car. There's a few I have in mind. I love Ferrari's but a 1967 Lincoln Convertible sounds cool too, and I could throw all my kids and their friends in the back seat (and the rest of the neighborhood as well). A couple years ago, I would have never even considered buying something so "frivolous". That's because I never saw it as investment. While it's true that buying a fancy new car would guarantee a loss of money for the foreseeable future, buying one that has fully depreciated in value and pivoted to become a collectors item is a totally different animal. The new car is what Robert Kiyosaki would call a "doodad". While a vintage collectible car would be, what I would call, an asset. Sure it doesn't cash flow but neither does gold. I would rather have a Dino than a few ounces of gold any day! In the world of the affluent, the theme of buying things that you can enjoy today and have as something worth more ten years from now is quite common. I didn't really notice it until some of my wealthy friends opened my eyes. If you can afford it—it's a very smart way to live. Just think about the amount you spend on cars, furniture, watches, and wall decorations that are sure to be worth zero some day. What if you could replace all of those with appreciating assets? It's a very interesting way to live and one that I am really starting to warm up to—that's not easy for a guy who still drives his 12 year old Prius. Now I get that not everyone can afford to spend $300K on a vintage car or $3 million on a piece of art. But financial technology is really making some of the things that were previously not attainable for most of us into a reality. How about owning an Andy Warhol? Did you know that right now you can invest as little as $25 and own part of a famous Warhol piece? You can even visit the painting at a gallery in New York and enjoy it for yourself. This whole new world of investing is very exciting and my guest on this week's Wealth Formula Podcast is one of the entrepreneurs who is making it happen. So, if you want your piece of that Warhol or whatever blue chip artist gets you excited, listen to Scott Lynn tell us exactly how to do it.

With the rocky stock market and concern for recession in the air, it is always interesting to go back and reflect on investing behaviors over time. These days, when people are frightened, they don't invest. Instead, they keep all of their money in the bank. Why? Well, you've probably never witnessed a bank failure and lost your money. In fact, unless you've lived through the Great Depression, you've seen nothing but bank bailouts and smaller banks being gobbled up by huge banks that are too big to fail! But during the Great Depression, thousands of banks failed and there was no FDIC protection for those who lost their life savings. People living in that period of time experienced banks closing their doors and not allowing them to withdraw funds on a regular basis. As it turns out, as banks turned their backs on people, the life insurance industry provided its policy holders with substantial amounts of liquidity at a time when it was much needed. Cash value life insurance policies saved many families from financial ruin. It is no surprise, therefore, that after World War II the life insurance industry entered a Golden Age. Those living through the Great Depression wanted nothing more than reliable growth and stability. Bank failures and the stock market crashes were fresh in people's minds making the safe haven of life insurance all the more appealing. It is this sense of steady growth and security that has made Wealth Formula Banking such a major part of my investment strategy. It is a dynamic tool providing tax free growth, the ability to have access to significant asset protected liquidity and an opportunity to provide leverage to all of my cash flow investments (double dipping as I call it). Apart from all of these features, it is simply the safest investment I have. Now don't get me wrong, the majority of my money is in real estate which, when done properly, can be pretty darn robust in a downturn as well. In fact, part of what makes insurance companies as strong as they are is that they own a lot of the most expensive real estate in the country. The stability of life insurance products makes it incredibly appealing to me. How do I use it? Well, typically people have portfolios of stocks and bonds. In my case, I own almost no stocks. I own real estate instead of stocks. My version of bonds is Wealth Formula Banking. What's funny to me about being such an advocate for Wealth Formula Banking is that, despite the fact that it is a life insurance product, I think of it as an investment tool for when I am living. Until recently, I didn't even think about the death benefit. But recent false health alarms in my life have led me to start considering legacy and the value of the death benefit as well. As investors, we don't get to see the upside of the death benefit on our own policies obviously. However, there is a way to get exposure to this part of the life insurance benefit—by buying someone else's life insurance policy. You see, permanent life insurance policies are assets that can be legally sold to someone else. When I first heard about this concept a few years ago, I was amazed that I had never heard about it. As it turns out, it was because only hedge funds, banks, and other institutional players were playing in this market. When I set out to find a way to get exposure to this asset class myself, I was lucky enough to run into a company called ASR that, after significant due diligence, I decided to partner with and they have been part of my team since that time. Tim Wright is a partner at ASR and a wealth of knowledge when it comes to life insurance products and their role throughout history and in your portfolio. If you need some hedging in your portfolio, you are not going to want to miss this week's episode as I talk to Tim about the different ways to get exposure to life insurance policies as an investment.