
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Today we are beginning a new series on original sin based on Kegan Chandler’s presentation from last year, entitled, “Origins of Sin: The New Heretics and the Metaphysics of Disobedience.” I’m excited about this four part series for a couple of reasons. First off, I’m glad to host a place where we can discuss genuine theological differences in a respectful and constructive way. So often in Christianity today, there’s just not an opportunity for peer review. Well, here on Restitutio, we are going to do just that. Secondly, I’m excited because this is an important topic that many of us have not through. Oftentimes until someone challenges our beliefs, we just go with the flow. However, whether we realize it or not, that flow was determined long ago by Christians whose reasoning may or may not stand up to scrutiny today.
In what follows Chandler is going to present his case that the idea of original sin goes back to Augustine who combined bits and pieces from earlier Christians like Cyprian and the Manicheans. Now, this is a strong position Chandler takes. Essentially, he argues that the doctrine of original sin is not native to scripture, an innovation of the fifth century. If Chandler is right then all of us are born neutral without the stain of Adam’s sin upon us. Furthermore, Christians need to stop making excuses for sinning and realize that we can live without sin.
Next week, I’ll air part two, which will be Jerry Wierwille’s critique of this presentation. Then I have two more interviews where Chandler and Wierwille discuss this topic at length.
Also, I took notes on Chandler’s presentation which may help you navigate your way through this talk as well as show you the spelling for these ancient Christians in case you want to research any of them further. (See below.)
—— Links ——
—— Notes ——
Augustine’s Doctrine Defined
 By Sean P Finnegan
By Sean P Finnegan4.8
146146 ratings
Today we are beginning a new series on original sin based on Kegan Chandler’s presentation from last year, entitled, “Origins of Sin: The New Heretics and the Metaphysics of Disobedience.” I’m excited about this four part series for a couple of reasons. First off, I’m glad to host a place where we can discuss genuine theological differences in a respectful and constructive way. So often in Christianity today, there’s just not an opportunity for peer review. Well, here on Restitutio, we are going to do just that. Secondly, I’m excited because this is an important topic that many of us have not through. Oftentimes until someone challenges our beliefs, we just go with the flow. However, whether we realize it or not, that flow was determined long ago by Christians whose reasoning may or may not stand up to scrutiny today.
In what follows Chandler is going to present his case that the idea of original sin goes back to Augustine who combined bits and pieces from earlier Christians like Cyprian and the Manicheans. Now, this is a strong position Chandler takes. Essentially, he argues that the doctrine of original sin is not native to scripture, an innovation of the fifth century. If Chandler is right then all of us are born neutral without the stain of Adam’s sin upon us. Furthermore, Christians need to stop making excuses for sinning and realize that we can live without sin.
Next week, I’ll air part two, which will be Jerry Wierwille’s critique of this presentation. Then I have two more interviews where Chandler and Wierwille discuss this topic at length.
Also, I took notes on Chandler’s presentation which may help you navigate your way through this talk as well as show you the spelling for these ancient Christians in case you want to research any of them further. (See below.)
—— Links ——
—— Notes ——
Augustine’s Doctrine Defined

15,951 Listeners

8,618 Listeners

2,018 Listeners

19,233 Listeners

956 Listeners

125 Listeners

1,460 Listeners

7,087 Listeners

33,387 Listeners

555 Listeners

80 Listeners

221 Listeners

61 Listeners

56 Listeners

17 Listeners