Eric Sampson and Rebecca Tuvel explore the contested issue of academic freedom. They discuss the tensions that emerge when universities try to balance the promotion of diverse intellectual perspectives with concerns over potential harm to community members, as seen in controversies involving figures like philosopher Peter Singer. 

Drawing on debates about gender, race, and ethics, they analyze the institutional challenges of fostering open inquiry while ensuring a safe and respectful academic environment. 

Join this conversation to reflect on the evolving landscape of higher education and the fundamental questions at stake in preserving academic freedom.

[00:00] Introduction

[00:09] Thought Experiment: The Peter Singer Controversy

[02:30] Academic Freedom vs. Harm and Danger

[07:36] The Role of Universities in Handling Controversial Topics

[11:46] Institutional Model of Academic Philosophy

[17:25] Historical Shifts in Moral and Scientific Views

[31:29] Debates on Harm in High-Stakes Moral Topics

[34:02] Mischaracterization of Controversial Views

[38:05] Protests and Speech Restrictions on Campus

[50:20] Viewpoint Diversity and Government Enforcement

[55:33] Donor Influence on Academic Freedom

[58:31] Boycotts and Freedom of Research

[01:02:01] Concerns of Indoctrination and Institutional Reforms

[01:06:59] Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Check out FeedSpot's list of 90 best philosophy podcasts, where Brain in a Vat is ranked at 15, here: https://podcast.feedspot.com/philosophy_podcasts/