In today's podcast I'm asking some tough questions about government housing policy that many politicians seem reluctant to address directly. I originally recorded this as a YouTube video - and you can watch it here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0N3Fo9Ymiy8 

On the video you can see my slides too. 

With record levels of immigration putting unprecedented pressure on our housing system, the government has increasingly turned to Houses in Multiple Occupation – HMOs – as a solution for accommodating asylum seekers. What about you if you are a landlord housing asylum seekers? What led you to utilise this strategy? Is is a worthwhile investment and what concerns do you have? 

These aren't just abstract policy questions. Communities across Britain are seeing the real-world impact as local housing markets are stretched and communities affected. Take Sarah Pochin, the MP for Runcorn and Helsby, who made asylum seeker HMOs a central issue in her campaign. She was particularly critical of how these housing arrangements affect local communities – but why? What did she see that made this such a priority for her?

Today, I'm examining whether the HMO system for asylum seekers is actually necessary, or whether it's simply a symptom of broader immigration policies that aren't working. We'll look at the numbers behind mass immigration, the real costs of this housing system, and why some MPs like Sarah Pochin have been sounding the alarm.

For the organisations running the government contracts - what is the reality for landlords working with such organisations? And are they making money as is claimed? 

Let's dig in to find the real statistics and uncover the reasons why Sarah Pochin made this such an issue in her campaign.