Based Camp | Simone & Malcolm Collins

Dive into the controversy surrounding the Los Angeles mayoral election with Malcolm and Simone Collins on Based Camp. Spencer Pratt appeared to be on track for a runoff spot but was suddenly overtaken by a third Democratic candidate amid massive late mail-in ballot surges. Was this organic voting patterns, or something more suspicious?

The Collinses review claims of election irregularities, including the puzzling vote count updates that showed zero votes for Pratt in one batch, Skid Row vote harvesting (with residents allegedly paid in cigarettes and cash), ballot collection practices, and the broader issues of mail-in voting in deep-blue LA. They explore both the mainstream counter-narratives and on-the-ground reports while discussing voter ID, election integrity, and why local races matter.

Episode Transcript

Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today, we are going to be discussing the latest LA election and the shenanigans that- that may or may not have occurred around that.

Shenanigans.

A couple of our fans were like, “This is the most blatant cheating I have ever seen in an American election,” and they wanted us to look into it.

And I will say that this is an interesting thing for me to look into, because I really don’t know... Like, obviously, if there was election fraud that happened The New York Times, NPR, all the major leftist sources are not going to admit it, because they didn’t want Pratt to win, right?

Simone Collins: Well, and what I did hear from my broad leftist news sources was

Malcolm Collins: Yeah,

Simone Collins: you gotta go, buddy.

What I heard from my broad leftist news sources was something along the lines of the Republicans are butt-hurting because Pen- Spencer Pratt didn’t even come close to winning, but he never would because he’s a Republican running in LA, and that seems totally reasonable, so I didn’t think to look further.

How can this be a [00:01:00] thing? I, I don’t understand why there could be any weirdness-

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, and then the, the secondary thing is obviously, and I, I, you know, I hate to say this about our side, but our side, like if he if, if there was actual election fraud, they would all be saying that regardless. So we don’t actually gain any new information from what they say there.

But we don’t gain a lot of new information from our side because obviously no matter what happened, if he legitimately lost at the last second our side would of course come out and say there’s election fraud, right? So that doesn’t exactly give me additional information

so what we’re going to do is we are going to review from both sides pieces on this particular alleged fraud.

And

Simone Collins: then we’re going to- Wait, so the fraud ‘cause you had told me earlier that you thought that the issue was... I mean, it’s inevitable that a Democrat’s gonna win in Los Angeles.

Malcolm Collins: No. It’s not so it’s kind of fraud. So there was a, a two-tiered runoff, okay? Okay. This is the gist of it, right? So there’s this runoff system, it’s called, like, a jungle primary where they decide who’s gonna run, and it means- Okay

you can have multiple Dems running against each other- Sure ... or a Dem versus a [00:02:00] Republican. Yeah. The leading candidate was this terrible Dem candidate. The, the Black woman, whatever her name is. Anyway she, she was coming in first. Then Pratt was coming in, and then there was a third Democrat that had about half the votes that Pratt had- Okay

in terms of sentiment polling, in terms of what they were able to measure, in terms of, like, at the ballots, bold, voter exit polling. And then at the very last moment, all of a sudden this flips. Mm. And all of a sudden- Mm ... Pratt’s getting no more votes- Uh-huh, uh-huh, uh-huh ... and all the votes are going to the third candidate.

This is something that the, the narrative of I have laid it out is the narrative that even the left disagree with. Everyone agrees Pratt was demonstrably in the lead i- in terms of spot number two. And then now was he ever gonna win the full election? I, probably not. But the having him i- be in the final runoff was scaring people, right?

So Pratt was demonstrably in [00:03:00] the lead, then all of a sudden this socialist candidate flips it up, right? And-

Simone Collins: Doesn’t it have to do more with the fact that mail-in voting was very heavy in the Los Angeles election, that ballots could be posted quite late, and that it could be that this particular third candidate had a really heavy and also late mail-in voting campaign push?

Malcolm Collins: Well, that is the only plausible thing, except from at least my reading of this, they didn’t have a heavy and late mail-in voting push. So the explanation that leftists have been using

Okay. The explanation that leftists have been using for this is that, okay, yes, she didn’t have a coordinated mail in voting campaign that could explain this, but mail in voters are overwhelmingly Democratic in nature, right?

And so if the mail in voters are overwhelmingly Democratic in nature-

I don’t even remember what I was saying.

Simone Collins: So I had asked you it, [00:04:00] my, what I had heard was, oh, the Republicans are butt hurting about Spencer Pratt being in a minority lead for a little bit and then losing a bunch of ground all of a sudden seemingly. But what they’re missing is that Republicans are heavy with in-person voting, Democrats are heavy with mail-in voting, and in Los Angeles and in California in general I think even postmarked- Ooh

maybe even possibly up to the day of the election you can still submit mail-in ballots, and that what is happening is that possibly this third candidate or Democrats in general were just doing their last minute thing and sending in their mail-in ballots- Yes ...

Malcolm Collins: and that’s what was

Simone Collins: happening.

Malcolm Collins: So we will explore this theory, but there’s- Okay

a problem with it.

Simone Collins: Okay.

Malcolm Collins: The problem goes that in this last minute push that happened all of a sudden for this Democratic candidate, the votes should have, right, like if it had been like a normal election, should have continued to go disproportionately to the Democrat who looked like they were going to win the first place, right?

The voting [00:05:00] shouldn’t have shifted between Democratic candidates late in the process like this. That doesn’t make mathematical or narrative sense. So we’re going to get it- Because, yeah, it could just be that a bunch of Dem votes came in at the last minute, right? But then those votes would presumably proportionally still be for the person who won top ticket first, and then for the person who ended up beating out Pratt second, not almost all exclusively for the person who edged out Pratt.

So we’re gonna look into both of these explanations because there are, you know, plausibles and then it’s like, okay, yeah, but what’s really happening here?

Simone Collins: Yeah. Like, my, my standing plausible theory is that whatever that third candidate that got a surge after, you know, the, the, then overtook Spencer Pratt was just one who heavily focused on last minute mail-in ballot-

Malcolm Collins: Yeah

voting. So we’re gonna see if that’s true, and we’re also going to go into what the leftist counter-narrative is. So I’m gonna start with the leftist counter-narrative, okay? The leftist counter-narrative goes like this. And [00:06:00] I’ll be reading from a piece, How a Misreading of Data Fueled False Claims About LA Mayoral Vote Count.

Okay?

Late on election night, an update of vote counts in Los Angeles mayor’s election appeared on electoral results pages of various media outlets, including the Los Angeles Times. It showed leading Democrats Mayor Karen Bass and Council Member Neda Rahman receiving tens of thousands of new votes, and leading Republican former reality TV star Pen- Spencer Pratt from receiving no new votes.

So basically, on the screen, there was this big, like, huge number of votes to these two Democrats, and then literally zero votes for Spencer Pratt. Some voter, observers of the vote tally immediately took the screenshots with some shouting fraud. I mean, that looks a lot like fraud. Others ran statistical analysis that showed it would be impossible for a candidate such as Pratt running second in the race to receive zero votes in such a large batch of bal- ballots.

In fact, the update that showed zero Pratt votes was [00:07:00] followed one minute later by another update that showed tens of thousands of votes for Pratt and none for Bass or Rahman. There was no batch of votes that included zero votes for any candidate, and LA County’s own data shows that plainly. But the claim’s fit was the broader false narrative being pushed relentlessly by Trump and other Republicans in recent days that California Democrats were cheating.

Voter data pushed out by the Associated Press came as two separate updates one minute apart, with Bass and Rahman’s votes in the first and Pratt’s in the second. The AP vote count receives updates as provided by election officials and adds them to our vote count. What happened in this case is that there was some log in an automated update, such as that one candidate’s votes were added in an update, and the other candidates were followed about a minute later, the Associated Press told The Times.

Specifically, an elec- electronic update from the Los Angeles County website pulled in votes from only one cro- group of candidates, including Karen Bass and N- Rahman. [00:08:00] Exactly one minute later, the electra- the electronic update picked up votes from another group of candidates, including Spencer Pratt.

Taken together, the updates included the 21,000 votes for Pratt, the 12,000, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. Okay. Does that sound plausible to you?

Simone Collins: I don’t know with this election stuff. Like, the way stuff is counted and the way stuff is reported to me feels very opaque even though it’s designed to allegedly be trackable and, and transparent.

And I know that there’s a ton of shady stuff, and also very inconsistent stuff that comes with mail in ballots. For example, we just voted in the Republican primary election in our local area, right? And we had requested due to sometimes unexpected travel to have mail in ballots. You received your mail in ballot.

I did not even though I requested mine. And I know that I had requested one because- Well, there’s been a

Malcolm Collins: lot of it. When you say I received, you didn’t receive your mail in ballot, what we’ve seen, and somebody might have voted under your name by the way just so you [00:09:00] know what’s been a common form of voter fraud recently is going around houses and taking the mail in ballots as they come in-

Simone Collins: Yeah

Malcolm Collins: and then using them to vote. And people have been filmed doing this. This isn’t a conspiracy.

Speaker 20: On Tuesday just before midnight, David Sprouse’s surveillance cameras captured this man stealing not just his mail but his neighbor’s as well. It was a younger-looking man, uh, happened to come down the sidewalk. He was wearing a ball cap, face mask, gloves. Uh, carefully opened up our mailbox, took out all of our mail.

Simone Collins: Yeah, and yeah. It’s, this is, this is entirely possible because in the last election your ballot was missing. Remember when you had to fill out the provisional? ‘Cause I, then I went to the polling station this year.

I had to go to to

Malcolm Collins: vote. Yeah, I did not, and all these replies-

Simone Collins: And I was like, “Well, okay, maybe I forgot to request my mail in ballot. Maybe it was my mistake so I’ll just go and vote.” So I go and vote. They’re like, “Well, you requested a mail in ballot so now you have to fill in a provisional ballot instead.”

And so I did that. And remember last time we voted you had to do that because your mail in ballot went mysteriously missing. So e- if you and I are [00:10:00] experiencing this,

Malcolm Collins: but the point being is that it, it’s happened in multiple election cycles with our house, which makes it to me seem highly plausible that we are looking at systemic election fraud happening in this way in our area.

I- given that the, the, their systems all show the vote went out, right? Like, that’s why we’re having to fill in these provisional ballots. It’s not, like, a mistake that we made or something like that, and it’s happened multiple times. Mm. So- Yeah. And, and we do know that the, the, the wider Philadelphia area is one of the areas where, th- that has had serious allegations of this.

It has? And note now for the people who are like, “Election fraud never happens,” we now have videos... What? Oh, the kids. We now have videos of people stuffing the ballot boxes and stuff like that in some past recent American elections.

Speaker 16: This surveillance video, showing a supporter of Mayor Joe Ganim and a City Hall employee stuffing envelopes into the dropbox outside the Bridgeport Government Center. Now, the other [00:11:00] investigation will look into the use, distribution, and possession of absentee ballots at the Fireside Apartments, which is a senior and disabled public housing here in the Park City.

The Commission says even before last Tuesday’s primary, there was a significant attention in allegations of ballot abuse.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Mm. Have you seen these, Simone? They’re crazy.

Simone Collins: No. And also, like, these days I don’t know what’s fake and what’s real, and-

Malcolm Collins: Well, it, it becomes, it

Simone Collins: becomes a blur of real

I, I mean, like, when, when I ran, when I ran for office here- Like- ... remember, like, I, I spoke with a lot of people who were super involved in elections- Mm ... who were getting out the vote, who were trying to help the... In, in my case, of course, since I was a Republican candidate, I was talking with people doing the Republican stuff.

And they were talking about their experiences watching elections, watching the votes come in, and then seeing these strange and sudden changes in vote count and jumps in favor of a different candidate at the last minute. But again, like- I don’t know. You know, in the end, like

Malcolm Collins: there’s- But no, Simone, what I’m telling you, is there have been confirmed videos- Mm

of people stuffing [00:12:00] vote mailboxes. This is not a maybe it’s AI generated or something like that. This is a, this is coming from police who have gone through security videos that have shown people showing up in the middle of the night with big bundles of ballots, looking really shady both ways, stuffing them in the box, then coming back 30 minutes later and doing it again.

Jesus.

Simone Collins: Oh,

Malcolm Collins: my ... th- th- there, there have been elections in the United States where this has happened. We know from the Texas issues that there were I think it was, what was it? At least like 50,000, 100,000 fake votes. And, and this is just in Texas that were confirmed. So like we know that this is happening in the United States.

Like, these are questions. The idea that you should never question an election, I think as soon as Trump won again, that went out the window because then all the Democrats started saying-

Simone Collins: Well, hey, that’s... See, Trump is just doing God’s work, all right? He’s getting them to be critical of election integrity.

They sh- I mean, again, like it’s, it’s so funny. I grow up thinking like, “Of course vote by mail is fine. Of course we don’t [00:13:00] need voter ID.” And now I’m like, wait a second, like this is actually super shady. Like, I, I even don’t like the idea that... Again, like when I went to the polling station to do my provisional ballot this year, I I w- I was like, “Oh crap, I don’t have my ID with me.”

Like, it... Of course I assumed as any, like, normal person that if I’m going to vote in an election, and if this is something where it’s like, oh, you know, I verified this, verified that, like they’re gonna ask me for my ID. And yet, no, it’s just like your, your name and a signature or something.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. So the, the biggest coun- counter to this piece is that it doesn’t focus on the core instance of election fraud that Republicans are claiming, right?

It doesn’t explain either of the... It basically focuses on one glitch that would make anyone suspicious, right? Why, why were the two Democratic candidates in one grouping and the Republican candidate in a different grouping in the way that they were handling the ballots in the first [00:14:00] place, right? Like, presumably they would all have their own groupings if that’s the way it was being done, where they would be updated individually, not in groupings like that.

That makes very little sense. I can see why people were suspicious of that. But then it doesn’t even mention the other claims that people are talking about- Mm ... with the Skid Row vote harvesting. So we’re gonna get into that in a second, but I also wanted to, before I go further- Skid- oh, they’re

Simone Collins: going to, like, vagrants living in tents and stuff and getting them to vote?

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, and paying them to vote

Simone Collins: Ah.

Malcolm Collins: And there have been, lots of people have reported on this. There’s been a lot of on the ground reporters who have gone and asked the people in-

Simone Collins: Yeah, that’s just the, the sort of thing that would be great for YouTube views. I could totally s- yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, and they’re, they’re, they’re, it’s, they’re all saying like, “Oh yeah, of course.

Like I got cigarettes for voting this year. I got, I got $2 for voting this year.” You know? Or for filling out these forms. You know, and people have been saying in the comments and stuff like this, that this is actually a very old practice in LA County that they use. Specifically things like [00:15:00] teachers unions and stuff like that use it whenever they wanna get something through, you know, like, the, the, it’s, it’s like... Well, what’s wrong, buddy?

Simone Collins: Friend? Friend? Whoa. Okay, here we go Friend, did we... We’re not missing any threads. I think he just, like, deep throated a thread and then it came out and ignited his gag reflex. You okay now, buddy?

Malcolm Collins: He wants it back immediately now that he’s choked on it

Simone Collins: Oh,

Malcolm Collins: God. Going straight at it again. Okay. Oh, God.

Simone Collins: Okay. Yeah. Tripping on voter fraud.

Malcolm Collins: So what we’re gonna go, and, and I will put some of these videos in here

Simone Collins: Yeah ... for you people. I, yeah, I, I would, yes. I wanna-

Malcolm Collins: But the problem with this is, like, nobody cares. And it’s been interesting, Jimmy, because we can [00:16:00] see this vote buying happening.

Everybody knows that Democrat, like, on the ground people would do this. It doesn’t even need to be institutionalized. But this wouldn’t explain the last minute change in mail-in voting, right? Because the Skid Row voters are not the mail in voters. You, you don’t have a lot of mail in voters who are homeless people, right?

The homeless people who are being paid to vote are coming and voting in person likely. So that doesn’t really fit the broader narrative here. But let’s go into this. Here we have a piece called Spencer Pratt Pack uncovers disturbing new mystery in Skid Row. Okay? And this is from the New York Post. A Spencer Pratt volunteer team has claimed they found lots of ballots that were sent out to Skid Row, but few were actually voted in the mayoral l- race.

The California Post joined four members of the Pratt pack on Sunday as they spent hours touring the rundown neighborhood. Former California State Senate candidate Susan Collins, interviews a resident on Skid [00:17:00] Row. They asked dozens of local about voter registration, mail in ballots, and the petition gatherers who had worked in the district for years trying to get them to vote.

It comes just a week after Pratt was dumped out of the race for mayor after Karen Bass won and Nayan Ramak received a huge pile of mail in ballots that saw her dramatically overtake him. Susan Collins, a former California State Senate candidate, who was part of the Pratt pack on Sunday, told the Post, “We’re finding a lot of people being registered to vote, a lot of ballots being sent out, and nobody actually voted.”

Oh, so that would explain how they did it Okay, so, so this is what basically is being alleged, Simone. It’s that they are going in and paying these people to register to vote, and then basically keeping their information, and because these people are homeless anyway, like, the vote’s not gonna go to their house.

They just send it to their own houses and then mail on behalf of these people. I think the... [00:18:00] No one can hear you. You’re muted. You’re muted.

Simone Collins: Okay, so I am me, whatever, right? I, and I care about getting X candidate registered, so I just walk along Skid Row and I’m like, “Hey, can I, can I register you? You can just use my address,” and they don’t even necessarily know what I-

Yeah

and then I give them a pack of cigarettes, probably just a cigarette, maybe three. I don’t know. Whatever. And then I just get their, their thing. I, w- I, I, I forge their signa- I mean, they, they do this weird thing where, like, the signatures are supposed to match, so how do, how do you think that would work?

Malcolm Collins: You just- I don’t think they check or care if it’s a Democratic candidate. I mean, come on. They’re not, they’re not really checking right now. The thing that people keep asking for, Republicans keep pushing for, is the voter rolls. And- Mm-hmm ... the fact that they are not releasing the voter rolls, like, I can understand if they believe that there is fraudulent voting going on- Yeah

Why they wouldn’t release these voter rolls, right? Because it would look really bad for them to do.

Yeah.

And I’d point out here, you, you’re like, “Yeah, LA is heavily Democrat leaning,” which [00:19:00] is true, but Pratt’s campaign was astonishingly good, and Democrats have done an astonishingly bad job running LA for a while at this point.

Simone Collins: People are getting pretty fed up.

Speaker 11: Please, I’m begging you. There’s homeless drug addicts in front of the schools. My children aren’t safe. Look, if you were a transgender migrant, I could get you a free pussy. Let’s move the drug addicts closer. Bass already solved crime. I endorse her. Next!

Speaker 14: I just wanna rebuild my home. It’s been over a year.[00:20:00]

Speaker 15: This is a machine. If we wanna burn this town to the ground

Feels so close to you right now You can do it, Spencer!

Simone Collins: I’m, there, there was, there was a lot of of smear campaignage to try to make Pratt look bad, of course, as well But yeah, sure

Malcolm Collins: Also to your question of whether she did some big [00:21:00] genius last-minute mail in campaign what AI said is, no, she didn’t. It said the most realistic answer is Rama is a sitting council member who is well-known among progressive LAs.

Her base, younger, more liberal urban Democrats, is much more likely to vote by mail closer to the deadline.

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: The problem, again, is why did they switch from voting from the front runner to her all of a sudden the moment it looked like the front runner was going to beat Pratt?

Simone Collins: Maybe because once you know they’re gonna win, why give them pity votes when you could show support for an underdog that you really like?

Malcolm Collins: That’s a good possible explanation. They’re

Simone Collins: waiting. Like, I, I could see myself doing that as a young Los Angeles voter trying to... I, I guess she gets nothing out of it, but she has a less- ... a less embarrassing loss. And, and certainly getting more votes, it could be a starting point to future campaigns. You know, it shows future campaign donors that she has the capability of gaining traction even when running up against [00:22:00] better funded, more famous opponents, right?

So-

Malcolm Collins: Yes. So to go back into what’s f- f- fuddy here. Okay A review of public records identified more than 7,600 registered voters linked to shelters, supportive housing projects, addiction to their treatment centers, and social services agencies, including one of 160 registrants contacted to the Midnight Mission in Skid Row.

One longtime local told volunteers on Sunday he personally knew the Mariana Del Rey woman recently charged by federal prosecutors was paying homeless people to register to vote. Brendan Lee Brown Armstrong, also known as Annika, was charged in May with paying another person to register to vote. So people have been charged over this as well.

This isn’t just a conspiracy theory. The question is, are they still doing it? According to federal prosecutors, Armstrong worked for years as a paid petition circulator collecting signatures for California ballot measures, and has agreed to plead guilty. Wow. “She was right on this corner,” they said. This was her area,” Titus Brown told volunteers.

Brown [00:23:00] claimed people were routinely offered money or cigarettes to sign forms. “She gives them $3 to $5. Some of the cheap people she’d give $2 and a cigarette,” he alleged. But Brown told LA Times- Dude, that’s

Simone Collins: so little

Malcolm Collins: Our elections are being sold for very little. But you know, they pay more per vote if you’re talking about, like, the main elections in the United States.

Simone Collins: Yeah. For sure. That’s crazy.

Malcolm Collins: Throughout the years residents remembered registering to vote. They remember petition gatherers. What many didn’t remember was actually casting a ballot which is interesting. They, they remember people coming around and trying to get them to register. They just don’t remember then voting.

Speaker 3: Videos posted online by LA Needs Spencer Pratt shows multiple Skid Row residents claiming they received around $2 in exchange for voting in the recent Los Angeles election. Karen Bass, yeah? Yeah. Or, or Nithya Raman? Uh, Karen.

Speaker 5: Karen. They told you to vote for Karen? Yeah. They had to sign the little thing. That’s, uh, and how much they pay you? It’s, like, two bucks. [00:24:00] Two bucks? Oh, to sign off on a, on a thing to vote for her? Yeah. And so they do this for everybody out here? Yeah, they come out here all the time. Several residents made similar claims.

Speaker 3: One man alleged he was not registered to vote in Los Angeles County but was still encouraged to complete paperwork. I’m not in this county. I’m in San Bernardino County, but they just said, “Who cares?” They gave me a name to, to write. They gave you a name to sign? They gave me everything to sign. They gave me a whole paper of, like, who, what to write and who to sign and everything, so.

Another resident alleged people were sometimes instructed how to complete voter paperwork and ballots. But we know that they gotta answer to somebody by what they said, so it ‘cause it’s not authentic. I don’t wanna have to scratch it out. And don’t let your signature look like the other signature. Can you use your other hand, or can you write with your foot or your nose?

Speaker 7: I’m serious. They ask you to do that? Yeah. For ballots? And I was doing it just so I could get the money.

Malcolm Collins: The volunteers moved through the tents, shelters, and service centers, sidewalk encampments, interviewing people, residents about their experiences with the drives. “A [00:25:00] lot of people never voted,” Brown said. “They did register, but they just wanted the names.” That’s interesting. For Collins, a- and ap- apparently this was still happening in this election, and they know people have been arrested for doing this in past elections, so it sounds like it’s still operational.

For Collins, who had spent the year raising concerns about ballot collection practices, the most striking part of Sunday’s visit was hearing the same story repeated block after block. “So what I’ve been hearing from a lot of people is that they’re registered to vote,” Collins says. “I’ve not found anyone, anyone who has actually voted.”

Simone Collins: Wow.

Malcolm Collins: The big question is what happened to all those ballots? People remember getting them. They don’t remember voting. So where did they go? And Julio, who was visiting Skid Row for the first time, described that experience as eye-opening and said it strengthened her determination to be involved rather than watch from afar.

“It was really intense,” Juliano said. “We saw a guy chasing another guy with a shovel and attack him.” Juliano said she came to sh- Skid Row looking for answers and convinced there was more to the election story than the voters were being told. Wow. “I guess I was part of [00:26:00] trying to figure out what happened.

The numbers just don’t make sense. That’s why I’m digging deeper into the sidelines. One thing I would like to say is I think this election fraud has forever changed Los Angeles,” she said. “At least that’s my hope, that people will feel empower- empowered to talk about the truth and keep looking for the truth.”

And there have been other reporting on different types ... So from a different New York Post piece, bombshell photo unveils damning Nithan Raman link with homeless voters as fury erupts over LA vote count. Thousands of homeless voters are registered to vote in LA shelters, and Sprint Sir Pret was eliminated by Nithan Raman.

So they, they, they then did a review here. And it said the ... so here they’re looking to see, Yeah, this seems to be, it, it seems to be the same thing. They’re just going over video evidence of this that they found. So here’s where I come at the end of this. Like, what, what do I think on all of this?

Did Democrats do this in the past? Yes, we know they did, and they’ve been charged for it in the past. Is it the [00:27:00] type of thing that Democrats would do? Like, consider the size of, like, Antifa and stuff in LA. You’re not asking, did the Democrats organize this from the top down? Right. You’re asking, was there any rogue group of Democrats, extremist leftists in LA with motivation and means and opportunity to do this?

There was definitely manifold of those.

Simone Collins: Well, okay. Here’s where I’m gonna push back, right? So the person who got the surge in votes was someone who wasn’t going to win anyway, and it was very clear that they weren’t going to win, correct?

Malcolm Collins: Yeah.

Simone Collins: And then suddenly these votes appeared. When you do pay someone to buy you votes, right, illegally, sure, this person, you know, people like this are paying one or two cigarettes, three bucks per person.

Mm-hmm. But they in turn are charging probably quite a lot per voter because of the legal liability to which they’re [00:28:00] subject, as is shown by the convictions we see here, right? Mm-hmm. People are doing time. People are really paying a lot in terms of when you get caught. So when they’re weighing the odds of getting caught they’re, they’re ultimately gonna charge a lot more.

So why would this one particular candidate or people supporting this one candidate pay that much for votes that weren’t going to help them win anyway? That doesn’t make sense to me. I’m more likely to believe a conspiracy theory- What do you mean votes

Malcolm Collins: that did help them win? I’m confused.

Simone Collins: My understanding...

Oh, sorry. It’s the fragility company.

Malcolm Collins: So anyway, what was the point you were making? Why, why do you not believe that there... You, you said the amount it costs- So my understanding was that

Simone Collins: the surge of votes that came in, that were presumably bought, were for a candidate that was never going to win in the first place, that was not the Democratic front-runner, right?

Malcolm Collins: Right. It

Simone Collins: was- So why would someone pay the non-trivial cost to buy voters? Because what you’re paying, you know, the people to commit a, a crime is pretty high. Like, the premium [00:29:00] is high.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, but what you are forgetting is the, the crime was already committed either way. So, presumably, the way that this works, given the various points that we’ve heard, is I, a Democrat, go and I ask homeless people to sign up to vote.

And I give them my address, right?

Simone Collins: Okay, so it’s, it’s like a subscription. It’s like I, I have on offer every single voting cycle, these are my homeless people. Would you like my homeless people this

Malcolm Collins: year? Yes, every single voting cycle- Would you like my homeless people? ... I have on offer a list of votes that I can choose how they go.

Simone Collins: And then who, who knows how it’s administered, right? It could be like I’m this one person, this crime boss of Democratic politics or whatever polit- like, who knows? And it could be apolitical, who’s just like, “I’m gonna decide how I deal with these votes.” It could even be someone who’s not paying someone else.

It could be a totally third party who’s like, “Who do I want to have my votes go toward?” Yeah. This is my little kingdom. So

Malcolm Collins: the crime would have already been done. Uh-huh. They would’ve been sitting on votes that they have to cast either

Simone Collins: way. Yes. They’re like, “How do I want my votes to go?” [00:30:00] They could have decided, “Well, I know that the, the, their...

We don’t have to worry about Spencer Pratt. This Democratic front-runner’s gonna win. I want to place this, this up-and-coming Democratic candidate.”

Malcolm Collins: Well, the wording would be, “I wanna make sure that Spencer Pratt isn’t in the final election,” ‘cause that’s what would’ve happened otherwise.

Simone Collins: Oh. Oh, I’m sorry. I totally missed that.

So if he had not been surpassed by this other Democrat, he would’ve been on the,

Malcolm Collins: the- Yeah, he would’ve been on the ballot for the

Simone Collins: final then Oh, and then there actually was, he ha- would actually have a shot, instead of just two Democrats.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah.

Simone Collins: Oh, okay. Well then, okay, yeah. The, the incentives are more clear then.

Okay, thank you. Now I know. Yeah,

Malcolm Collins: so now you understand the incentives, yeah. Yeah. So, basically I’m in a position of the people who are saying, like, basically at this point we’re at a point where I say demonstrably we know that voter fraud happened. Mm-hmm. The question is the scale of the voter fraud.

Simone Collins: Correct.

Malcolm Collins: And the, the, it, it really bothers me [00:31:00] that like we’re seeing mainstream Democratic outlets that are supposed to be like out there searching for truths completely uninterested in this. De- despite the overwhelming, I mean, we’ve got a conviction already, right? Like,

Simone Collins: the- Right. Well, the problem is all sides do it.

I mean, even arguably sides that people who don’t have a side. Mm. People who are just making money because this is a way to make money are doing it. Like, it, it’s one of those things where-

Malcolm Collins: I’ve never- ... I

Simone Collins: think a lot of people are- It’s all sides ... are concerned. Also, journalists are, journalists in mainstream media have this, there’s, like, there are two tiers, right?

Mm. Of like, is this a good story? Will this perform well? But also they have this whole, like, you know, I, I need to decide what the people can handle or not, right? Like, I’m not going to touch this conspiracy theory because it might incite racism or conspiracy thinking or- I was

Malcolm Collins: talking to the other day, one of our friends couldn’t believe the conspiracy theory that Michelle Obama was a man.

Simone Collins: Yeah. It’s

Malcolm Collins: like, and Simone, I’m like, “Simone, there’s a lot of evidence. You gotta,

Simone Collins: you gotta believe.” There’s not. There’s that, that, that, that dance... There, there’s nothing in her pants. You guys don’t [00:32:00] know female slacks. I’m sorry, but, like, women’s pants are

Malcolm Collins: weird. There, there is something hitting her pants from behind.

Simone Collins: There’s nothing hitting her pants from behind. There’s nothing. Not, it’s, it’s the way they crease. There is, there

Malcolm Collins: is-

Simone Collins: You don’t know what flowy pants... Men don’t wear pants like that. They don’t understand how they...

Speaker: Michelle

Simone Collins: mm, mm. Anyway, anyway, so I feel like this isn’t necessarily people trying to cover something up.

I think that there’s this journalistic, like, “I decide what the public can and cannot handle, and I believe that the public cannot handle this. Therefore, I’m not going to cover it because the, the nuance will be lost, and they’ll just, you know, it will undermine democracy, and I’m not gonna play a part in that.”

And I think that a lot of people see us as being irresponsible for feeding into the conspiracy theories when it, like, is, there are really [00:33:00] serious issues of voter fraud. But I also see the point of journalists who are like, “I’m not gonna bother co- cover- covering this,” because what are you gonna do, Malcolm?

Like, we can’t uncover these people. Like, we can’t find them. This is a lot harder to uncover than, like, daycare fraud, you know? Like, th- this is much more hidden, much more insidious. People have been trying to find this forever. It’s really difficult to uncover because of the way the systems work, because there’s no voter ID, because you can just take a ballot out of a, a, a thing.

And like, it, like, even if, even if every signature is checked for a match, you can easily find what someone’s signature looks like. Like, it, this is one of those very difficult situations, you know?

Malcolm Collins: N- I don’t, I don’t think it is. I, I think we’re dealing with a scenario where, I mean, I understand w- why they’re doing what they’re doing.

Like, every, I think, sane American knows that even if there was demonstrable and large voter fraud, they wouldn’t cover it. Because it goes against their political interest, right? Like, we haven’t really seen them cover many things that go against their political interests.

Simone Collins: Well, no, no. I mean, it goes in their political interest when it’s about, [00:34:00] like, a, a Republican candidate winning.

Malcolm Collins: Oh, yeah, a Republican candidate, yeah. But the point being is you’re like, I, both sides are d- I don’t think in LA Spencer Pratt or even the LA Republican Party has enough institution to commit voter fraud at this size.

Simone Collins: Right. Right. But I mean, I’m, I’m sure there’s Republican voter fraud in other areas.

Look, it’s, it’s,

Malcolm Collins: this is

Simone Collins: a system they do it.

Malcolm Collins: I doubt it’s at the same scale. Highly

Simone Collins: I don’t know.

Malcolm Collins: I don’t know I mean, it- it’s, it’s there. It’s just when we look at... And, and the reason why I doubt so strongly it’s at the same scale- Hmm ... is if you look at the Republican apparatus, because we’ve been involved in it at, like, the grassroots level, right?

They are fighting rabidly for stricter observation and oversight to prevent voter fraud. If they were the ones-

Simone Collins: Oh ...

Malcolm Collins: still committing voter fraud, they wouldn’t be doing that. And the- That’s

Simone Collins: pretty damning. That’s pretty

Malcolm Collins: damning ... the louder damning thing is that the left has been fighting [00:35:00] rabidly against investigation of voter fraud.

Simone Collins: That is moderately susp- okay, more than moderately suspicious. That’s a really good point.

Malcolm Collins: Okay, that should get- Yeah.

Simone Collins: Yeah ...

Malcolm Collins: not just that, but

Simone Collins: with the

Malcolm Collins: Save Our Country Act or whatever, the,

Simone Collins: we’re, we’re- That’s someone who’s like, “Hey, let’s be more careful,” and the other side being like, “No, what do you mean careful?”

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. If, if I have one team out there who’s like, “We should have ID, in-person only voting,” and then another group out there that’s like, “That would be a end of American freedom,” right? Like, I’m like- Okay ... “What are you talking about?”

Simone Collins: When you put it that way, the look is not good. It’s a, it’s a bad look.

Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, so, my general takeaway from this is it’s happening. It’s probably pretty big. There isn’t a lot you can do once they capture a region. Just based on the evidence that we have access to, I mean, it seems that, like, everyone who’s involved is saying, “It’s happening, just what’s the scale,” right?

And I think the scale is probably pretty big. If you look at the, And, and here I’m not even looking at, like, the observed statistics. I’m just thinking about the number of radical leftist groups in LA that [00:36:00] don’t care a damn about the law and would have motive, means, opportunity, and time to do something like this.

If they have time to, like, stage these giant protests, somebody in the org has time to do something like this. And then I think what we learn about this is you can’t let them win, ever, right? This is the thing with, like, Nick Fuentes’ dumb strategy of like, let, g- let’s let the left win and then the right will get angry enough that it ri- Generally, when the other side l- wins, our side moderates.

That’s how it works. If you want our side to become more extreme, what you need us to do is win a number of times in a row, not lose. Because the average Republican voter doesn’t then say, “I guess we need to be more extreme.” The average Republican voter says, “I guess we need to be more moderate to pick up some of those swing voters,” right?

So, but it’s not just that. It’s that once we lose an area, when you look at the map, and I’m gonna put the two maps here,

of states where you are allowed to vote without an ID and states where Democrats [00:37:00] win or won in the last election it’s like one for one at this point, right? I think that we’re entering a place where we cannot give an inch of ground because they’re realizing that the demographics are shifting against their favor.

And there will be a point, you know, once we have the 2030 redistricting, where it essentially becomes impossible for them to win going into the future. And after that, what do you do, right? When you look at the the higher fertility rate among Republicans and we look that people vote like their parents vote, when we look at the shifting right-wing vote in the youth of these days, you know, if these trends continue this is, it’s over.

It’s game over for the left. And I think that they’re behaving in a way that seems rational to them and, and ethical to them because they believe that the right are literally Nazis. That’s why it’s important that they define it that way because it gives them what’s called a psychological license to do whatever they want to combat it[00:38:00]

Simone Collins: Yeah, okay. I, I, yes. You, you’ve also changed my view on this. It is worth covering this because it is worth to explain why it’s very important to push for voter ID laws.

Malcolm Collins: Voter ID laws, they’re never backing down. No, no election is unimportant. Not your local elections, not your national elections, every election matters.

Yeah. And if you, if you vote by mail like us to try to make it easy, just keep in mind you’re gonna have the person drive by and steal your ballot.

Simone Collins: Not great. Not great.

Malcolm Collins: But that’s, that’s you know, just, just the state of America right now and why we need to be so overwhelming in the legitimate votes that we’re putting out there.

Simone Collins: Well, friends, be careful and make sure your ID is current.

Malcolm Collins: Anyway love you, Simone. Have a fun day at the dentist, and thank you for your time

Simone Collins: Love you [00:39:00] You’re beautiful. But that should come as no surprise.

Nice one, Tex. Nice one Okay

Camera is- Mary,

Malcolm Collins: can you hear me okay?

Simone Collins: I can. However, I need a moment

Malcolm Collins: to find where my camera is.

Okay.

Here we are. Found it. Oh, no, no, no, no, you don’t. Don’t even think of it. I

do feel- I do- ... good being able to do this with you again today.

Simone Collins: I know. I, I miss it, and that’s, you know, why I -

Malcolm Collins: Oh, we got a close-up of a baby.

Simone Collins: Oh, no.

Malcolm Collins: Oh, no.

Simone Collins: Frank.

Malcolm Collins: All the women out there now need babies. [00:40:00]

Simone Collins: I don’t know. I don’t know if close-ups help or hurt.

Malcolm Collins: Got me in my pirate shirt today.

Simone Collins: No, actually-

Malcolm Collins: New, new Evil Maxx

Simone Collins: aimed ... I meant to get a proper, like, Mr. Darcy shirt. Rawr, rawr, rawr, rawr, rawr. God, Tex, I’m so sorry. Someday you’ll look back on this fondly, or not, Mr. Demaison.

Malcolm Collins: I don’t know. I, like, either I’m still with you, or the thought of losing you has destroyed me someday.

Simone Collins: What do you mean?

Malcolm Collins: Well, I wouldn’t look back on this, because I will just go talk to you.

Speaker 25: First one, actually, I’ll just light it for you

Speaker 26: Back, back. Here, Torsten.

Speaker 25: Hold it away from me so you don’t get hurt. All right, Tagan, come back. Go, go play over there. It’s gonna fall. Do not do that, Torsten. Octavian, come back here[00:41:00]

What happens if- If you w-, if you, do not let that touch anyone or it’ll hurt them Why is it going down the thing?

Titan, do not let that touch anyone or you will never get to play with these again Toasty, why are you putting it on the deck? Why? You’re burning the deck. That’s bad, Torsten. You have to hold it up in the air. It says that it might burn me. Octavian, come here. That’s why there’s the metal part at the bottom.

Speaker 28: There you go. See, look, it stops at the end right there. Can, can I try it again? All right. Go play, Octavian. When you’re done you can give it to me. What? Just never put it on the deck. It’s not burning. Oh, it’s empty. No, we’re done. We’re done? Mm-hmm. Oh, Octavian, you got yours.

What do you think, Professor?

Speaker 26: How do I know? How do I know?

Malcolm and Simone Collins discuss a surprising realization about why many leftists accuse pronatalists of having a “breeding kink.” They explore how some in the trans community appear to structure major life decisions around arousal patterns and identity fulfillment, leading to projection onto families who have many children (often via IVF).

Topics include: why breeding kinks don’t actually drive real family-building, the difference between fantasy and daily life, identity-maxxing vs. objective function living, Techno-Puritan sins, power dynamics in kinks, furries, Lia Thomas, and much more.

This episode dives deep into psychology, sexuality, culture wars, and how different worldviews shape behavior.

Episode Transcript

Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] Hello, Simone. Today we are going to be talking about basically a very weird phenomenon that has happened to us repeatedly, and I didn’t understand it until today, and I had this, like, shocking realization when I was just thinking through this today, and I was like, “This explains so much of a leftist mindset that I didn’t fully understand before.”

Which is when we initially would go viral people would say, “Oh, like, why do they have to, like, bring us into their weird breeding kink?” You know, and this was a common... I, I’d say it’s, like, 1/5 or 1/8 of comments whenever we used to go viral.

We, we had a journalist come to our house recently, so, like, a trans individual who’s a journalist, and he was interviewing us or she, whatever. I, I, I never know with these people. She was interviewing us over, And by the way, if, if you’re trans and annoyed by that, just know how annoying it is for the rest of us when we can’t tell, we don’t care, and you act like it’s the biggest effing deal in the world, [00:01:00] and yet you dress and act in a way that intentionally makes it hard to tell, right?

Like, I would gender you right if it was obvious to me, right? I’m not, I’m not, like, out there actively trying to be a... But you are intentionally dressing in a way to make it difficult for me to know, right? So why am I supposed to... You’re just being a jerk to people. You have made your existence a jerky existence to other people.

But anyway, so the, the, she comes here and she gives us an interview, and in the interview she asks us something along the lines of, like... And, and this was the thesis of the interview. Like, is this all really just a kink? Like, is there a kink that’s motivating you guys to want to have lots of kids?

And I was just, like, sitting there like, does, do they really believe that, like, I would have five kids because of a kink, right? Like, the amount of my life I would have to dedicate [00:02:00] to something as simple as, like, something you masturbate to, right? Like, a, a simple arousal pattern would be genuinely astonishing to invest so much that I have five kids over it.

And I, I was just thinking today, like, do they really think that I’m doing all this? ‘Cause I was, I was, like, playing with my kids. I’m like, do they really think I have kids over a kink?

Simone Collins: Well, and then they get super, super shocked when they discover that we’ve produced all of our kids with IVF.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, that we produced all of our kids with IVF.

They’re like, “Oh, that... Well, that undermines the entire thesis.” But- They they, th- which they were very confused about, right? Like it, is it... And, and, and then today I had this realization. Oh my God, I assumed that they just didn’t understand, or they were trying to cast aspersions on us, or they were trying to be edgy in some way about this.

[00:03:00] But then when I started to think about it more, I was like, but wait a second, this is a trans person. If they’re trans over a kink, which a good portion of the trans community appears to be in their own stated things. They’re like you- if you go to the, you know, trans Reddit and stuff like that, they’re like, “Well, of course, like arousal is part of this,” and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

Now they have tried to define it as not a kink, tried to define it, but if you look at the actual written experiences of trans people going through gender transition many of them talk about it as something that is partially arousing to them. This is incredibly well documented in trans people talking about their own lives, right?

And in addition to this, we have entire trans communities where when you ‘cause I actually read like the Transmaxer Manifesto, right? Trying to get people to Transmax. And this is clearly a, a, a gender transition modification transformation kink in, in, in even the way it’s structured. It’s like, wouldn’t it be so hot if X, Y, and Z, and D, right?

You know. So [00:04:00] I read through these things a- and I’m like, if this person transitioned over partially an arousal pattern, yeah, that’s actually how they live, right? They really are living their entire life, their entire reproductive future, which I guess to me, I think of as like one of the core impacts you have with your life, was decided potentially downstream of an arousal pattern.

And I saw this and I was like... I had just never considered to take what they were saying at face value. It just seemed so insane to me that an individual could say all of this, that it didn’t enter my mind as, no, they might actually mean this. And I think once we accept that yes, they do actually mean that, you can begin to understand so many other things about modern [00:05:00] leftist philosophy.

Thoughts before I go further, Simone?

Simone Collins: No, although I am curious if this ties in with your concept of the techno-puritan sin of, of living to fulfill an identity versus living to maximize an objective function.

Malcolm Collins: Well, I mean, I think it’s, it’s both. I mean, transness is obviously it breaks, like, all of our sins.

I mean, one, they’re living to fulfill an identity and other people’s perception of them, which I see the fundamentally fai- vain way to live. You can just, you know, choose to live however you wanna live, right? And, and say, “What matters is my effect on the world, not whether or not I appear a certain way in other people’s minds.”

Like, obsessing over that, we argue is sinful, where sinfulness are just things that f**k up your life in the long run. But second it’s sinful in that it’s... And, and I think that it- it- it’s, it’s living your entire life after an arousal pattern. Like, we don’t even, we don’t even put into our sins living your whole life in the pursuit of [00:06:00] happiness because we say happiness is a choice, right?

So you don’t need to pursue it. It’s something that you should sort of grab and subdue. You choose how you interpret the things around you in life. And when you realize that this sort of, like, higher form of happiness, like am I content with myself, am I moving forward, that it’s a choice, well, then the only sorts of happiness you have are the basal forms of happiness.

You know, this is, like, eating whatever food you want all day, every day, right? Or just having constant orgies or engaging in huge life-changing behavior to fulfill arousal patterns, right? Which are just a, a basal sort of breeding thing in the background of all human biology that really shouldn’t affect any sort of a daily choice.

And this is where it all got really interesting for me. Because if I am listing, like, my unusual arousal patterns or kinks or anything like that and I have argued in the past that a breeding fetish is about the only thing in the world that is not actually a fetish.

Simone Collins: Right.

Malcolm Collins: [00:07:00] It’s what the entire arousal system is built to get you to do.

About anything else that arouses you is ancillary and something misfiring.

Simone Collins: All non-procreative sex is a fetish. Or some kind of weird kink, I guess.

Malcolm Collins: But anyway, of my list of, like, things that really turn me on, the wider category of breeding fetish content is actually one of those things for me. It’s not my top thing but it’s probably number two.

But with

Simone Collins: that being- Well, based on its popularity, like, if you look at just sort of top ranked tags and stuff in erotic material, for men specifically, that’s kind of the thing. In women, I just don’t see it that much, actually, for, like, female content, which is interesting.

Malcolm Collins: And do you not see it a lot in female content?

Mm. I mean, sort of being forced to breed you see in female content, like, Not

Simone Collins: really,

Malcolm Collins: actually ... in The Handmaid’s Tale and stuff like that, like the-

Simone Collins: No. Because even then if you actually look at the [00:08:00] books most or most if not many of the men are themselves infertile, so-

Malcolm Collins: Oh, really?

Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah, like, there are issues with, like, some of the doctors being like, “Well, I will.

I will inseminate you ‘cause I know for a fact this guy is infertile and he doesn’t know it. But, you know, you should just therefore let me F you,” and then, yeah. So it’s, it’s a whole thing, actually. Wait, but

Malcolm Collins: isn’t that a kink in itself? Isn’t that part of the breeding kink?

Simone Collins: No, I don’t think so. Yeah, anyway, I, I don’t- Does,

Malcolm Collins: does, does she go with

Simone Collins: the doctor?

Does she- In Handmaid’s Tale I just don’t think that... I haven’t read the books. I, I only know from, like, some summaries and stuff that I’ve heard.

Malcolm Collins: Of what?

Simone Collins: But, like, there’s not a lot of actually getting pregnant going on. Like, some, some of the ancillary characters go through pregnancies and stuff, but-

Malcolm Collins: I guess it, it, it, like, once you get pregnant and have a kid, all of the sexy stuff after that

Simone Collins: begins to- Pregnancy is, yeah, that’s, that, that is where for m- m- maybe a majority of women, I don’t know, like, sort of arousal and, and, like, stuff being sexy just dies with [00:09:00] pregnancy and with newborns being around.

So typically with female erotic material, it is, there are-

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, but especially if it’s, like, multi-books ... no

Simone Collins: children around.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Like, if she gets pregnant in book one and now in book two she’s raising a newborn, like, all of the other sexy stuff starts to get weird.

Simone Collins: Well, and you have to keep in mind pregnancy is while a beautiful thing, often very uncomfortable.

Like, you’re not aroused when you want to vomit. You’re not aroused when you have intense nerve pain. You are not aroused when you feel incredibly large and when your- Right ... legs are swollen and when you look like, you know, a, a watermelon, right? Like, noth- there’s nothing. Like, now first, I’m sure there’s always exceptions, right?

I’m sure there’s some women who feel incredibly sexy and have really high sex drive and everything when they’re pregnant and when they have newborns and whatever, right? Like, all these things are possible. However no. Like, and I’ve, I’m, I’ve c- I’ve consumed, like, so much erotic material both targeted at men and targeted at women.

Women, it’s power dynamics. It’s getting high-powered men. It’s high-status men. It’s and, and, [00:10:00] and a lot of, like, just the more general focus i- like, really hot men, Yeah ... men who’ve always had a crush on them, men who really like pleasuring them. It’s never, “I’m going to get you pregnant.” Like, that actually if anything could possibly be on average a turn-off for women, which is really interesting.

Yeah. Yeah, so- but yeah, I, I do not, like, it’s super common in male-oriented stuff, not in female-oriented stuff.

Malcolm Collins: That, that makes sense. That makes sense. So the, point I was getting to here is even as somebody who like would just admit if you consider the idea of impregnation being hot a kink, right? Or your partner being pregnant a kink, right?

Like, I, I always think she looks better when she’s pregnant. If you consider that a kink and I’m saying me, even as somebody who would have both of those things being in like my kink category, they have never activated around my actual children’s birth, right? Like-

Simone Collins: That’s true, yeah.

Malcolm Collins: They, they have [00:11:00] never, because I don’t like, even

Simone Collins: me- Well, no, and then I, I will point out, and this is maybe getting a little bit too TMI, but like even before we realized we had to do IVF and we were just, you know, timing and trying to get pregnant naturally- Yeah

like it actually felt kind of unsexy to, when we were actually trying to get pregnant- Oh, oh ... ‘cause it was like, oh God, this is like the ovulatory window, like we have to do it now. And

Malcolm Collins: like- I, no, I completely agree. It was- Yeah ... really unsexy. Like-

Simone Collins: Yeah ...

Malcolm Collins: having sex to conceive is like-

Simone Collins: Stressful and not sexy

Malcolm Collins: yes, you’re on a schedule.

Simone Collins: Super

Malcolm Collins: not sexy. You’ve gotta work it into unusual times.

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: You’ve gotta like, it is, it is

Simone Collins: actively- It’s typically like women aggressively like when men aren’t ready for it, being like, “I need you to like come inside me now,” and like just getting really intense about it. And like I, you, you, like even I remember your, m- again, not TMI, but like I remember your dad at a steakhouse being like, “Yeah, like it was really stressful when your mom was trying to conceive ‘cause she’d just be like call me up and be like, ‘You have to come home from work now.’”

And like, just like it’s not [00:12:00] fun for the men. Like it’s very clearly not fun for anyone involved.

Malcolm Collins: It’s, it’s not. But I’m, the point I’m making here is even with somebody with all of the layered kinks that could be associated with a breeding kink, right? Mm-hmm. Never was that process unusually arousing for me.

Mm. If anything, it went in the exact opposite direction. Because-

Simone Collins: Ironically ...

Malcolm Collins: it, it fell into, and this might have been a competing like anti-kink I have of, of the long procedures and everything like that- ... and a lot of you know-

Simone Collins: Anti-kink ...

Malcolm Collins: but whatever the point being is it never- Yeah ... influenced me or wanting to have kids.

Even though I may feel like my wife looks even more beautiful when she’s pregnant-

Simone Collins: Aw ...

Malcolm Collins: right? That would never, ever in a billion years factor into my decision to get her pregnant. Because that’s just like a minor modification into how attractive I find her. Maybe like a I find her 10, 20% more attractive for nine months, and then- She has [00:13:00] a child I need to raise for the rest of my life.

Simone Collins: Right. Like, and then, and then 18 years and she-

Malcolm Collins: That would be f*****g insane.

Simone Collins: Yeah.

And just to hammer this home further, even though I find her more physically attractive when she is heavily pregnant, I do not have sex. We do not have sex when she is heavily pregnant. And people can be like, “Oh, it’s totally safe for the baby,” whatever. I’m like, “Mm, actually, there have been cases where baby has, have died or suffered injuries during it.”

It is incredibly rare, but it is absolutely possible. Um, and I would never in a million years forgive myself. In a million years. Imagine you knew that. Like, I, I’m not going to do something where I might have to live with the fact for the rest of my life that I know I killed one of my kids because I wanted to get off, and she couldn’t even get pregnant that day.

What are you talking about? That’s so disgusting. Um, I, I know some people are like, “Well, I just wouldn’t have sex if I [00:14:00] couldn’t have sex with my wife all the time when she’s preg-” Whatever. Okay? I’m just pointing out here that it’s actually instances in which I cannot have sex with her because I’m worried about the safety of my children.

Even if it’s a one point zero zero zero one thing, I’m not taking that chance

Malcolm Collins: That would be absolutely insane.

Simone Collins: Mm-hmm.

Malcolm Collins: But then weirder than, and I, and I actually, like, I want to communicate this to these people, and I w- I, when I originally was thinking through this, I was like, well, think of it this way.

Like, even if you have like some BDSM related kinks. Personally I’m aroused by being in a dominant position when I’m with my partner. We’re like getting a list of kinks I have today. Oh,

Simone Collins: boy. Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: I’m aroused. I have never been aroused by being a boss, right? I have never been aroused by having to fire someone.

I have never been aroused- ... by being in a real world position of authority over someone.

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: For the vast majority of kinks, to activate them, you need to engage in scenarios that are so [00:15:00] divorced from anything that actually happens in real life that they’re not gonna accidentally activate during normal daily stuff.

Simone Collins: Hmm.

Malcolm Collins: And I think a, a lot of people would get this, right? Like, when I talk about the BDSM thing, most people, I think most people probably have some level of arousal to submission or dominance.

Simone Collins: Yeah. I mean, that, in, in our research, that was just so- Yeah,

Malcolm Collins: like

Simone Collins: the

Malcolm Collins: vast- ... pervasive. So if you’re one of our followers and you’re aroused by submission or dominance, have you ever actually been aroused by, like, being someone else’s employee-

or being someone else’s boss? Yeah, someone’s

Simone Collins: like, “Go clean the toilets.” Oh, yes. Say that again, slowly.

Malcolm Collins: Y- you’re like a f- yeah I mean, surely somebody is. But I realized- Yes ... what’s different for me in them-

Simone Collins: Yeah ...

Malcolm Collins: is there are ways that some people with submission fetishes or dominance f- fetishes relate to being an employee or boss that [00:16:00] is sexualized.

Like, we do see people engaging in relationships with their boss where, like, that’s clearly a component to it. No,

Simone Collins: but that’s, it, it’s the power dynamic. It’s not the bossing, it’s the, the fact that he is the boss and I’m the secretary. And there are definitely plenty of female fantasies around that in terms of, like, the material that’s popular.

That is certainly common in female- Or- ... or in general erotic material ... you see this in the

Malcolm Collins: case of, like, teacher-student, right? Like, where a teacher is in a relationship.

Simone Collins: Yeah, no, teacher-student, boss, and... Well, and, and you see it w- with male erotic materials, too. A common one, of course, is nurse, right? It’s, it’s one of those places where it’s acceptable for a man- Well, no,

Malcolm Collins: but that,

Simone Collins: the,

Malcolm Collins: the point I’m making is I’m not talking about in erotic material, I’m talking about in real life stuff.

Simone Collins: Oh, sure. Or- Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Malcolm Collins: But what I realized is that these people who are actually aroused because of this position they have relative to somebody who they are the boss of- Hmm ... or who are in a submissive position because they’re [00:17:00] somebody’s employee, they relate to their daily duties in a way that is totally foreign to the way I relate to my daily duties.

Simone Collins: Oh, sure.

Malcolm Collins: It would never accidentally arouse me to be somebody’s teacher, right? I would never mistake that for this other type of relationship.

Simone Collins: Yeah, good point.

Malcolm Collins: And then I realized, oh my God, it’s not just in those instances. It’s also likely in the instances of how these people like the whole trans thing, the, the idea that, like- Oh, well you couldn’t possibly just do something every day all day that’s primarily intended to arouse you, right?

The idea of transition itself as being in that category, right? It’s like this is why they do all this weird fetishy stuff all the time that I have found so confusing, right? Mm-hmm. Like, I’ve always been like why, why, why do we have, Who is the, the, the swimmer? [00:18:00] The trans swimmer? Lia

Simone Collins: Thomas.

Malcolm Collins: Lia Thomas.

I always talk about Lia Thomas. I’m like, why did the trans community support her flashing male genitals at girls in the girls’ locker room when neither male or female locker rooms is it normal to fully undress yourself, and it hasn’t been for the past 20 years. It wasn’t when I was in school. It’s definitely not today, and we’ve been drifting further in that direction.

So that means that this is somebody who is intentionally flashing people. I was like, why did the trans community make this person a role model for the community, stand this individual, make them the figurehead when they were clearly acting in a way that I would think is a bad action? And then I realized I didn’t understand it.

Simone Collins: Hmm.

Malcolm Collins: Lia Thomas made every moment about what aroused her. Walking into the locker room and being like, “I am gonna make my entire life a sexualized reframing,” is actually very, very normal to people with this mindset [00:19:00] And I’ll note here, I think we see this in the conservative side as well. In the conservatives who are just doing this conservative LARP and don’t seem to have actual, like, values.

They’re just like, “I’m the most conservative person out there.” And that’s why when people try to, like, front on you with this stuff, like, “Oh, I’m more conservative ‘cause I’m more...” whatever thing they wanna push on you. Like, “I hate the gays more, the Jews more,” the, you know. And it’s like, come on, the communists did that stuff, too.

You’re bad at being a conservative. You’re an idiot conservative. But the, the the conservatives who, who go with that, “I’m a more trad version of a Christian. You’re just, like, really involved in being a scripture nerd. So, like, what are you? Some nerd about study- the trying to get the exact right words in a way that makes sense?

Why can’t you just believe whatever I was told Christianity was when I was growing up?” And I’m like, “Well, because I actually wanna believe what’s true.” And they’re not interested in what’s true. They’re interested in what fits this theming, and then we see it affect in their actions. [00:20:00] Like the couple, the famous conservative couple where their marriage was blessed by the Pope and she was cheating with her boss the whole time, right?

Simone Collins: Blessed by the Pope.

Malcolm Collins: Blessed by

Simone Collins: the Pope. Apparently, though, there, it’s... What, what happened actually in that case is apparently you can, like, show up in a certain place when you get married, like, at, at, at, in the Va- in Vatican City, and the Pope will be there and, like, bless a bunch of people all at once.

So it’s not like they made some kind of special appointment with him. They like- Well,

Malcolm Collins: right, but

Simone Collins: it

Malcolm Collins: was

Simone Collins: still a very performative- ... showed up. It’s like showing up at a Mardi Gras parade and getting Mardi Gras beads thrown at you. Just, just to, like, put that in context for

Malcolm Collins: our listeners. No, no, no, no. I, I, I...

Look, and again, I wouldn’t even... As much as I might be anti-Catholic, I’m not gonna besmirch the Pope for accidentally blessing somebody who wasn’t true to their belief system, right?

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: He had

Simone Collins: no way of knowing. Well, plus with the Catholic Church there’s always redemption, so don’t worry about it.

Malcolm Collins: Right, right.

But I’m just saying even, even if it was personally organized, I would still... That, that’s not... But the point is is it was still a big show of, “Look at [00:21:00] how X I am.” Mm. And what I realize is that actually when you live your life based around maximizing an identity rather than a consequentialist value system, you can be aroused by these sorts of positions even if you’re a conservative, right?

Mm. The reason why a teacher may be aroused by being in the role of a teacher relative to a student or the role of a boss relative to their employee is because they are maximizing and they identify as teacher. That’s what they’re doing. I’m trying to be the most teachery teacher right now. And so that allows me to, if, if that’s what’s hitting the arousal pathway, then that hits it for me, right?

But if I’m going out there and as a boss, as I’ve always done as a boss, my job is to make money for my investors, right? Like, never, and, and, and not screw over customers and not screw over my employees, but like that’s always the calculation running in my head. It’s [00:22:00] never, “I’m a boss.” I, I can do the, you know, I’m a, I’m a boss song here.

Speaker 9: Direct workflow. Like a boss. My own bathroom. Like a boss. Micromanage. Like a boss. Promote synergy. Like a boss.

Malcolm Collins: But like I, yeah, I’m never thinking like, “I’m the bossiest boss.”

Speaker 2: Hey, I’m Buddy. I’m the boss.

That’s my sister, Grace. She’s not the boss. I’m the boss.

Malcolm Collins: I’m the boss.” But anyway, for making, about making cakes. But anyway it, it’s never how I perceive myself in those moments. I’m just a tool of trying to achieve a specific outcome.

And I realize that I think many progressives, so there’s sort of two people here who get sucked into this in ways that were, one, before foreign to me, but now make a lot more sense. One is the progressives who just like intentionally are pleasure maxing their lives.

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: And, and I think you see this sometimes as conservatives, but it’s fairly rare.

Just like the [00:23:00] only thing I live for is what arouses me and what makes me feel good. Yeah. And if, if, and these people can fall into various categories. Obviously if they are most impacted by arousal systems, they may go down the trans pathway, they may go down some other lifestyle pathway, like the furry pathway or something like that.

Simone Collins: The furry pathway.

Malcolm Collins: Or they may go down, you know, all these various things that they could go down. And actually this is an interesting point to me, which is really important for me in terms of how I see something like furries. When people tried to, the left tried to take Lola Bunny and make Lola Bunny less sexy, there was a big online outrage that predominantly happened on the right.

And what that showed me is A lot of people find anthro characters attractive, right? Like apparently this is normalized enough that like right-wing influencers were like, “How dare you desexualize Lola Bunny?”

Simone Collins: Is this true? I mean, it just... They, they made a humanoid character sexy. Like, [00:24:00] how is that... A sexy character- Well, so the point I’m making here-

that’s humanoid is sexy. Like I, how is that... It’s not like people are into animals

Malcolm Collins: The point I’m making... Well, yeah, they dr- that’s what they’re trying to do. They’re trying to make the character activate the part of your brain, for at least people without very strict counter systems look like a slightly modified version of a human.

Yeah. And because people like diversity in sexual partners, which we’ve actually seen from genetic selection events that happened in environments where mate selection was really important, like in Northern Europe. We have another episode where we go more into this, like are redheads monster girls.

But like, in

Simone Collins: these- Forgot about

Malcolm Collins: that ... in these environments you begin to have these really unusual dimorphic traits, like bright red hair and different eye colors. Which by the way you don’t have in most of the world. You do not have varying hair colors, you do not have varying eye colors. You only have these in these very explicit Northern European environments.

Mm-hmm. And because of that, or that just shows me that, you know, [00:25:00] historically, at least within populations that I’m related to liking somebody who looked in some way novel. Like a ginger looks very novel. Mm-hmm. You know, to, to a, a Roman, you bring a red-headed ginger in and th- they wouldn’t look any more different from the average human woman than a, a girl with horns or elf ears.

In fact they probably would’ve looked more different from the average human woman to a Roman who captured a red-headed slave with, with, that was a ginger than your average elf in fantasy fiction looks to your average human in fantasy fiction. But the point I was making here is that there is something very different from just saying like, “Oh, something’s arousing to me.”

Like, that’s a category of like anthro figures is arousing to me, and being a furry. Because it’s how you’re relating to this arousal pathway. Mm-hmm.

Simone Collins: Mm-hmm.

Malcolm Collins: When you’re a furry you’re saying, “This is going to be my identity. I’m gonna go to cons around this, I’m gonna invest a ton of money in this, I’m gonna incorporate [00:26:00] this thing that arouses me into my core idea of who I am.”

And I would say of, of the list of techno-puritan sins, let’s definitely add this one as, like, one of the higher sins you can commit of, of trying to incorporate a, an arousal pathway. Well,

Simone Collins: no, I think trying to incorporate any emotional pathway into your identity is- Right.

Malcolm Collins: True ...

Simone Collins: toxic. It- that’s not the point.

Your identity should be something that is meant to maximize your objective function. That’s it.

Malcolm Collins: Yes. But there are two, ... Well, by the way, for people, when she talks about objective function, that means the things that you believe have intrinsic value. Mm-hmm. Like a weighted list of things you think are good for humanity or that you’re commanded to do by God or, you know, whatever else, right?

Like, you have a, a, a thing that you as a human are made to do, and you believe that, right? Mm-hmm. And even, even if you think the thing that you’re meant to do as a human is maximize your own pleasure- Pursuing [00:27:00] pleasure in the way that these communities do rarely maximizes your own pleasure. Actually, like let’s look at furries as an example of this.

If you look at the suicidality risk you look at the unaliving risk among furries, it’s incredibly high. You look at the depression risk, it’s incredibly high. When you do this form of hedonism maxing, it ends up eating away at your actual contentedness because it’s just not how humans were designed to live.

Mm-hmm. It’s like even if I enjoy candy, if I do nothing but eat candy every day for breakfast, lunch, and dinner, I am going to feel much worse. You know, like pleasure maxing, even though candy make me feel good, candy not route to long-term pleasure maxing.

Simone Collins: Well, in fact, when it, when we discussed like is there a cure for gay in The Pragmatist’s Guide to Sexuality, from what we could see in the research, the only way you could really make someone not want [00:28:00] to indulge in any same-sex activity is to just inundate them so much with gay sex that they like just can’t take anymore.

Malcolm Collins: No, no now obviously same sex attracted people can suppress this arousal pathway. Yeah. Right? Like, there’s arousal pathways I suppress all the time, but the, the point I’m making here is we’re, we’re building out three categories. So category one is the people who are captured by an identity, and this identity can be tied to an arousal pathway or not.

Mm-hmm. But I think even if you don’t go into it as tied to an arousal pathway, like the Christian influencer who saw himself as like a boss or a superior to this person, and like the big tough Christian influencer guy, he became captured by this identity in a way that ended up trow- triggering arousal pathways that made him move against his core moral thesis, right?

Or his objective function as we would say. But then the second category is the true I’m gonna eat candy every day person, and this is, this is where you get, you know, the, [00:29:00] the haze influencer. This is where you get the healthy at every size people. This is where you get the ex- the, the trans extremists, right?

Where it’s just I’m gonna live my entire life based around whatever can make me... This is where you get the people crashing out on Twitter because the government won’t give them, Pre, pre... We had a whole episode. It was one of our craziest- Oh, PrEP. PrEP, yeah. We learned about how much the government pays on PrEP, which is only useful if you’re having orgies.

Like if you have a, a monogamous partner, because of how good anti-AIDS medication is now, but PrEP’s just largely

Simone Collins: irrelevant. Well, yeah. So not, not exactly orgies, but more specifically, like, a lot of one-off partners, new partners who you can’t really vet who you can’t necessarily trust to say, “Yeah, I’m taking the correct medication,” et cetera.

Yeah. Then that’s what PrEP is for. Yeah, it’s for, like, the most unsafe and irresponsible form of sex that you could have, regardless of your orientation. And the fact that the government’s paying for that is somewhat annoying.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well, no, government isn’t paying for it, you’re [00:30:00] paying for it. You, the viewer of Base Camp, are paying for it.

Simone Collins: Well, if you live in the United States, yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Well, I think most of Europe gives PrEP too, for free. You

Simone Collins: think? Hmm.

Malcolm Collins: You know. Thanks. De- definitely need to cut PrEP. And people are like, “Well, the, these people can’t control them. They should be able to control themselves.” And then they’re like, “And what if they get AIDS?

And we shouldn’t pay for that either, then they can die,” right? Like, w- w- whatever can happen to consequences, right? Like, don’t do X thing because it can lead to Y thing, right? Like, that should be on them to know, “Oh, gee, I shouldn’t have the orgy. I should just step back from the orgy,” right? Like, a little less orgying.

But yeah thoughts, Simone?

Simone Collins: Yeah. I, I’m, I’m trying to reconcile this in my head with the stated purpose of becoming trans, which is, you know, you feel like you’re born in the wrong body, and you’re just trying to resolve severe body [00:31:00] dysmorphia. The, the mainstream opinion on the left, as I understand it, is that this has nothing to do with your sexuality and it has everything to do with who you feel you are, which I guess we would probably say is a misnomer.

Like, your identity doesn’t matter anyway. It doesn’t matter who you are. You should just make the most of whatever you’ve been dealt and optimize it around your objective function. And if you’re suddenly born tomorrow, or, like, you wake up tomorrow and you’re totally different, it’s not like, “Okay, well, I need to fix, fix this to, to how I feel.

I need to just live,” like, and, “Okay, this is my body now,” like, “Okay, now I’m a rabbit person. Okay, then I’ll just do that.” In fact, I think you could argue that everyone has to do this throughout their lives, because one day you’re gonna wake up and you’re gonna be 40. And I think a lot of people are, like, trans young, right?

Like, they’re 40, and they act like they’re 12. And that’s just not, not ideal. You know, they should be leveraging the identity that they’ve woken up [00:32:00] in, in an optimal way. And I think- Nevertheless what the argument is with identity and, and being trans is that they feel like they’re in the body of someone with a different n- natal sex, and they have to fix that.

That it has nothing to do with sex. And I’m

Malcolm Collins: trying to- Yeah, nobody ever, like, the, the, it’s, it’s like, it, it’s very normal to not feel like you’re an adult, right? Like, this is a normal thing. Just because I don’t feel like- Yeah,

Simone Collins: or to not want to be an adult. Like, I mean, all the women who are getting elective cosmetic procedures to look younger are trans young.

You know? They, they are also getting gender affirming surgery and, and youth affirming surgery.

Malcolm Collins: Well, and identity affirming surgery,

Simone Collins: right? Uh-huh, exactly, which again, we would say is sinful. But I don’t, I, for, for women, I, m- many would, you could argue, oh, they’re doing it for sex ‘cause they wanna attract partners.

I don’t think they’re doing it for sex. I, so I don’t know if, if the trans thing is really about sex. I mean, so I’m trying to parse that out. ‘Cause also there’s this very common thing in, in, like, trans [00:33:00] discourse to say, “No, being trans is not expressing autogynephilia. They’re totally different things.”

There’s almost this, like, disavowal of people with autogynephilia. Like, it’s not a sex thing.

Malcolm Collins: There, there is not at all a disavowal in the actual trans community. So, this is something that they, that they signal very loudly to outsiders. But to insiders, it’s widely accepted.

Simone Collins: Okay, but you don’t deny that it’s signaled loudly to outsiders.

Malcolm Collins: No, it is signaled loudly to outsiders, but if you actually hang out on their forums, they’ll talk about this arousing them all the time. In fact, there was even a giant fight within the trans community like 10, 20 years ago, so, like even before it blew up between the the people who said, “Being trans is about gender dysphoria,” and these were called true scum, and the people who said, “No, being trans is about whatever I want,” which is the people who are called the two Qs.

And the whatever I want, while it often wasn’t explicitly laid out, was generally autogynephilia. Or some [00:34:00] form of kink or arousal pathway, right? Like, if they, that, that was well understood if you look at the leaders of the whatever I want community and the stuff that they were caught with, whenever they had leaks or anything like that, right?

You know. But yeah. What was the point you were making around this? I mean, my, my point is, like, the, the community- That

Simone Collins: it’s not about sex. That you’re saying, well, a breed- people who have a lot of kids don’t have a breeding kink. But people who are trans have a kink that they’re exercising every day, which is why they think that people who have a lot of kids have a, a breeding kink.

And I’m trying to push back and say, “I don’t know. I don’t know if people who are trans think it’s very sexual at all either.” In fact, I would argue that especially people who are- Read the forums ... male to female trans are, if anything, experiencing a significant drop in sexual arousal because it’s testosterone- They, we just read a thread about this yesterday

that’s the huge sex driver, and they’re, like, trying to kind of nuke that out. Have

Malcolm Collins: you read, have you read or spent any time reading, like, the trans subreddit or any community which would- Not

Simone Collins: in a very long time, to be fair ... talk to other

Malcolm Collins: [00:35:00] trans

Simone Collins: people? Not for a

Malcolm Collins: long time.

Simone Collins: It’s,

Malcolm Collins: it’s very common to talk about this in those communities, and they are not shamed for talking about this in those communities.

Simone Collins: Mm.

Malcolm Collins: It is seen as a normal part of transition, and people would say it’s very wrong to shame somebody for being aroused due to something tied to their transition. And they’ll always say, “Well, like, of course we don’t signal this to outsiders, but within the community, we know what’s up.” Right? Like, I think that to, to over-buy into this externalized like the too cute versus true scum war obviously happened.

If you do a, an internet search, it obviously happened. It’s, it, it, it’s one of the biggest parts or cultural fights within the growth of modern leftism and the movement that came out of Tumblr, right? And pretty much no one denies that the, the true scum lost. True scum now are seen as adjacent to TERFs, right?

Like, they’re, they’re seen as sort of similar in the same way that, like, [00:36:00] TERFs were sloughed off by the feminist movement as the wrong kind of feminists, the true scum were sloughed off by the trans movement as the wrong kind of trans. So I, I think that y- yeah, they’re aware that this is for them, and this actually even came up in the conversation with the journalist.

And I was like, “You know, obviously I wouldn’t wanna live my entire life just to maximize the amount of pleasure I, I, I s- feel.” And they said something along the lines of, “Well, you know, speak for yourself,” implying that, like, this is actually how they structure their life.

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: So even in that context, Simone, you saw the individual doing this.

Simone Collins: That’s fair. That is fair. Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: So I think that the, the, the thing is, is even if, or the, the wider context here, even if somebody has all of the fetishes around th- that presumably this lifestyle should be activating, it doesn’t work to activate them. It’s a very ineffective way. If you out there as an individual are [00:37:00] thinking, “I wanna have a lot of kids because of a fetish,” there’s places for that.

There’s, like known sperm dono networks appear to be primarily fetishes from what I’ve seen.

Simone Collins: Oh. Yeah, that’s true. That is true. Yeah, the people who just make themselves available for sperm donation. Totally.

Malcolm Collins: That seems to be about a breeding kink. I like Elon. What he’s doing seems to be partially potentially motivated by a breeding kink.

Just the way that he’s doing it. Instead of doing it all with one woman and surrogates, which he could do if he wanted to he does it with lots of women who he treats as disposable, which is often part of a breeding kink, right? So that looks like... I- I know he doesn’t treat all of them as dispo- but some of them he clearly does.

Like, it’s like I hit up a girl on Twitter, she’s interested, I impregnate her. There’s other ways he could achieve the same scale with significantly less legal liability with the money that he has, right? So there’s something motivating this outside of just logic. That said, maybe he’s, like, ideologically [00:38:00] against using using w- w- what’s the word?

Simone Collins: Surrogates?

Malcolm Collins: Surrogates. Yeah, ideologically against surrogates. No. No? Okay. So, yeah. ‘

Simone Collins: Cause he’s known to have used surrogates, so.

Speaker: Like if I had Elon level money, I would have a, uh, uh, like a facility in some third world country, like in India, I don’t know, South America, Brazil, something like that. Um, that’d be like Ender’s Game, raising like 50 kids per year, , in the best conditions I could afford for them, but at scale. , Which is obviously very different than the path Elon has taken

Malcolm Collins: Or maybe it allows him to operate at a scale that, like, even we’re unaware of that would make this make sense. I don’t know. But the point I’m making here is- is that the- the breeding kink is generally not tied to and then you raise a family of like 10 kids.

Very

Simone Collins: true. And

Malcolm Collins: I, and I, and I’d actually point this out to the trans community, like the trans community that is watching this and crashing out over me saying this. You kn- you kn- like, breeding kinks are common in the trans community. Like for example, Ana Valens had a, a [00:39:00] breeding kink. Remember? She wanted to like, she, she- There were,

Simone Collins: there were so many.

There were so many things ...

Malcolm Collins: This is a writer who w- dunked on Leaflet and Kirschner. But anyway, so Ana Valens was like, “Oh, I have this fantasy where I free use women and impregnate them.” Like, that means just having sex with lots of women and impregnating them. Oh. And then tran- trans women should have free access to cis women to just use them and impregnate them.

Now, this is clearly a breeding kink, but it is antithetical to and then I raise those kids. It’s, it’s the exact opposite of that. Breeding kinks are, at least from what I’ve seen in terms of like what’s out there, almost always tied to and then I move on.

Simone Collins: It’s almost more a correlated with sneaky copulation than it is Like anything you do with a partner, a long-term partner, pure bond partner Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Where that stuff is often much more motivated by “I really like kids and let’s make the kids,” right? Like that’s, [00:40:00] that’s the point of the sex, and then the sex is all schedules and everything like that. And as we’ve said, then you, then you basically get to a point where, you know, having a nanny is just like a prostitute by proxy, right?

Because- Yeah.

Simone Collins: It, it might be different for religious couples who are just open to having kids, meaning that like every time you have sex, you’re not necessarily trying to have kids. You know, God chooses, right? Jesus takes the wheel on that front, and then it’s not stressful in that way because you’re not trying to make it happen.

You’re just open to it happening when it’s meant to happen.

Malcolm Collins: Mm-hmm.

Simone Collins: In which case perhaps then it’s- More s- of a turn-on for the... I don’t know. Because I b- they also like, people who are you know, open, open to having kids and, and having families in that sort of very natural way tend to also not talk about what arouses them and their sex lives.

So who knows what’s going on in their heads, right? Like-

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well- ...

Simone Collins: who knows if they find it a turn-on or not. But I [00:41:00] think what, when you also look at just sort of how it’s described biblically, like becoming one, which really just means, like, as we interpret it, combining your genetics with someone and basically taking what feels like to us shards of our soul and, and, like, seeing them in children combined.

You know, really you see yourself, both of yourselves in one person after you have a kid, in that person. You do become one in that kid. I think that’s more, like, where you see the expression of love. It’s not really in the sex act itself or the sex act itself- Well, I also know here where- ... has more to do with sort of increasing-

a

Malcolm Collins: trans person may push back and say, “Well, it’s not just breeding kinks.” You know, you say that the breeding kink is never associated with a wanting to raise a child, right? And they’re like, “Well, what about, like, daddy dom little girl stuff,” right? You know, that’s tied to wanting to raise a child, and I push back super hard on that.

I, I would bet even, even people maybe we could get Shu on head sometime because we know that she was into this kink for a [00:42:00] while and now has a kid. I would bet to anybody who’s ever been into that kink, th- this is not one of the kinks I’m into but for anybody who’s ever been into that kink, having their own kids has never been arousing to them.

Like interacting- Yeah ... with their own kids. A, a, a one, the western mark effect is super strong. That’s the thing that makes you unaroused by anyone who sort of is growing up around you at certain developmental milestones. But in addition to the western mark effect which is usually with siblings, but also affects parents, because I mean, there, there, there is something that tells you and needs to tell you from a biological perspective people can have hot daughters.

Like, people can have daughters that are just objectively attractive, and you need to know at some sort of internal level, “Oh, I shouldn’t be procreating with this thing that happens to be

Simone Collins: my daughter.” That system doesn’t seem to work in everyone.

Malcolm Collins: And when you... Well, no. Where people end up with their daughters most frequently, it’s because you’re also more attracted to people you’re genetically related to, is when the father didn’t raise the daughter.

Oh. And this one we actually see [00:43:00] quite frequently is when a daughter raised by

Simone Collins: a dad gets called. Yeah. And, and when, when you have people raised separately because they both have the same, like, father through IVF ‘cause their, their father is a prolific sperm donor.

Malcolm Collins: Right. But, but even more than that is when the dad, like, divorced the mom young or something like that anyway.

Simone Collins: Sure. Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: We’re not gonna talk about that right now. The point I’m making here is the daddy dom little girl fetish is very obviously to me in the category of fetishes of power exchange. This would be the ex- same as, like, a nurse fetish or a teacher fetish or, like, a I’m in control over you in some other way fetish and you have less control than me.

This is about signaling submission and dominance, which is not actually something you do with your kids very frequently. I, I think that people would be surprised about that. Signals of dominance are just not a part of n- normal interaction you have with your kids because there’s almost this, like, intuitive understanding with children, until they’re teenagers at least, and that’s, you know, that’s a whole other thing, right?

[00:44:00] That the, the parent is in the authoritative position that it doesn’t need to be signaled. It’s not, it’s

Simone Collins: not part of your relationship. Well, it, basically if you have to signal it, that means you’ve, you’ve failed already, right? Like, you know, the, it’s a show, don’t tell kind of thing.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Yeah. So, that, that was sort of my wider thought.

It, it just made me realize, like, oh my God, they actually see the world this way, and I had just always bro- brushed it off as, like, a-

Simone Collins: Yeah, very confusing. Yeah. Genuinely ...

Malcolm Collins: it was either confusing or, like, they didn’t... And, and they’re, oh, you know they’ll clip this and see, like, he admits it, that, you know, the whole breeding fetish thing is something that, that turns him on.

I mean, yeah, of course. It’s what the entire arousal system is meant for. But I also have been very clear, and I think we’ll get other people in the comments who will mention this around whatever fetish they’ve experienced, that there is a big deal difference between something that is a conceptual fetish and something that’s [00:45:00] going to be accidentally activated by your daily life.

Mm-hmm ... and I doubt... I, I, w- w- I mean, one of the easy ones, ‘cause this is even... Anyone who’s into, like, the daddy dom thing ever accidentally been aroused by that with one of their kids, right? Like, presumably it should, if it, that’s the actual system you’re trying to activate. But I don’t think it is. It’s the authority figure non-authority figure system, which isn’t really the relationship you have with your kids.

The relationship I have with my kids is nothing like the relationship I’d have with, like, a pupil or something like that.

Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah. No. That’s, it’s a good point. I’m, I’m glad you brought it up, ‘cause that, that has always kind of befuddled me, and I’m just like, I don’t know, I don’t know what to say. I just, it’s not.

But this was worth going into. I love you. Anyway,

Malcolm Collins: love you, Simone.

Speaker 13: He’s really good at alligators[00:46:00]

What do you think, buddy?

Thanks, friend

Speaker 11: Yeah, you know to push with your knuckles, right? Yeah. Why? So you don’t get your fingers dirty, because you eat with your fingers

In this episode of Based Camp, Simone and Malcolm Collins dive into the viral meme: “I’m just a normal person from 1995.” They explore how mainstream 1990s views — including those from Bill and Hillary Clinton on immigration, welfare reform, and borders — are now branded as “far-right extremism.”

Using data from Cremieux’s Substack analysis of the General Social Survey, Pew Research polarization graphs, and cultural shifts, they discuss the leftward drift on race, gender, sexuality, institutions, and more. They argue that what was once normal (family values, personal responsibility, evidence-based thinking) is now demonized, while the modern Right has become the side of data, science, realism, and genuine societal progress.

Topics include: the Overton window shift, trans issues and science, immigration realities, political tolerance, why many 1990s Democrats would be “MAGA” today, and the divorce between “progressivism” and actual improvement. Plus lighter moments on Hunter Biden, AI waifus, and mashed potatoes.

Show Notes

To set the scene, here are some quotes:

* From our xenophobic, far-right president, saying: “I want to talk with you about the problem of illegal immigration. It’s a problem our administration inherited, and it’s a very serious one. It costs the taxpayers of the United States a lot of money, and it’s unfair to Americans who are working every day to pay their own bills... Our immigration policy is focused in four areas: first, strengthening border control; second, protecting American jobs by enforcing laws against illegal immigrants at the workplace; third, deporting criminal and deportable aliens; fourth, giving assistance to States who need it and denying illegal aliens benefits for public services or welfare.”

* Or this from our capitalistic first lady, advocating for a “welfare reform plan that will dramatically change the nation’s welfare system into one that requires work in exchange for time-limited assistance.”

What do they all have in common? They come from left-leaning public figures in the 1990s.

* Bill Clinton

* Hillary Clinton

The Rabbit Hole on X posted “Far right is often just a propaganda term for normal person” alongside a cartoon of a woman and man in a car, with the woman saying: “Why are you so far right politically” and the man saying “I’m just a normal person from 1995.”

Andy Hatfield posted another meme that reads: “Recognize the warning signs of a far-right extremist:

* Full time employment

* Literacy

* Loves his family and country

* Common sense

* Obeys the law”

Inspired by the meme, Cremieux wrote A Normal Person 30 Years Ago A normal guy in 1995 probably believes a lot of things that are unacceptable now on Substack and his post about it—plus the resulting discourse—became a trending topic du jour on X.

Cremieux’s Observations

In his Substack article, Cremieux broke from the sentiment-based memes and looked at the data.

“I opened up the General Social Survey and had a look around. To get started, I defined a few sets of political views: Institutional Confidence, Criminal Justice & Guns, Political Tolerance, Economic/Pro-Government, Racial Liberalism/Civil Rights, Gender-Role Egalitarianism, and Sexual & Moral Liberalism, and then I outlined a set of important social views.”

The data shows that:

* “People have become less confident in America’s institutions over time.”

* “When it comes to criminal justice and firearms, more people think courts are too harsh on criminals, more people oppose the death penalty, and fewer people think we ought to requires permits to buy guns. The last of these didn’t change that much.”

* “Political tolerance has somewhat increased since the 1970s, but it’s somewhat down since the 1990s. This general trend masks something interesting: more acceptance of gays and atheists, less acceptance of racists and militarists.”

* “Movement on economically left-wing views has been generally pretty flat, which is roughly what we also see for economically right-wing views.”

* “When it comes to racial liberalism, people have shifted far to the left. People have become more likely to ascribe Black-White gaps to discrimination and less to a lack of effort, among other things.”

* “When it comes to gender roles, egalitarianism has greatly increased.”

* Diana Fleischman recently made an interesting observation on that front vis a vis male postpartum depression

* “Finally, when it comes to sexual and moral liberalism, views on sex education, divorce, marijuana legality, and so on have, in some cases, quite radically shifted towards left-ward positions. Abortion legality for serious defects is the only exception among the bunch.”

He concludes that “the nation has moved considerably, but not overwhelmingly, to the left.”

His editorialization is thoughtful: “What can we say about the normal person from 1995? In many ways, he was much like us. In other ways, he was what most people would now regard as kind of a dick. He didn’t like interracial marriage and he wasn’t too keen on gays either. These social views aren’t alone: plenty of things now considered taboo were, at the time, wholly acceptable, even in polite society, and sometimes these were the majority view.

Right or wrong, I don’t think appealing to normal people in the world 30 years ago is likely to make many friends after realizing the sorts of things people used to believe.”

I largely agree but also think he is not extrapolating sufficiently from the data. “Let a racist speak” has gone down in the General Social Survey, but also the definition of “racist” has changed significantly, from something that is, we would argue, blatantly racist, to someone who, for example, believes genes dictate skin color and other traits.

In short, I think he was looking at the wrong thing to measure change.

Additional Observations Shared on X

NC Phycicist observed that “Pew Research illustrates this nicely. What the left calls the “far right” is just the left moving further left.” sharing a pretty illustrative graph showing diverging median democrats and median republicans in 1994 vs 2017:

HF responded that: “Society always changes and moves on. By definition, a progressive (someone on the left) is either ahead of, or keeping up with those changes. A conservative (someone on the right) wants things to stay the same and not change.

Society always changes and moves on. By definition, a progressive (someone on the left) is either ahead of, or keeping up with those changes. A conservative (someone on the right) wants things to stay the same and not change.”

But Charles Pontificates pointed out that “It’s mostly leftists who want deindustrialization and the stagnation of energy production, and that’s hardly progress.” sharing a graph of electricity and income per capita that makes it clear there’s no such thing as a low-energy rich country.

People also tried to make slippery slope arguments:

* Rikki Schlott: “How far do we wanna go back on this one though? I’m just a normal guy from 1960? From 1850?”

* Posterior Malone: “Yeah it’s certainly true to some degree, but 30 years is a very long time…imagine saying in 1995: ‘I’m not far right, I’m just a normal person from 1965’”

* Martin Stepan: “I’m just a normal person from 1895.”

There’s some pondering to be done about progress and time fixing everything versus toxic ideologies spreading.

Episode Transcript

Simone Collins: [00:00:00] Hello, Malcolm. I’m excited to be speaking with you today. I want to set the scene with some quotes. Let’s start with one from our xenophobic far-right president saying, “I wanna talk with you about the problem of illegal immigration.

It’s a problem our administration inherited and it’s a very serious one. It costs the taxpayers of the United States a lot of money, and it’s unfair to Americans who are working every day to pay their own bills. Our immigration policy is focused on four areas. First, strengthening border control. Second, protecting American jobs by enforcing laws against illegal immigrants at the workplace.

Third, deporting criminal and dep- deportable Americans. Fourth, giving assistance to the states who need it in denying illegal aliens benefits for the public services or welfare.” And then here’s, and just another one from our capitalistic first lady advocating for, “A welfare reform plan that will dramatically change the nation’s welfare system into one that [00:01:00] requires work in exchange for time-limited assistance.”

Oh, but crap. I used the wrong accents ‘cause, because I was actually quoting our different president and first lady from the 1990s, Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton. And that’s kind of the whole thing that’s been bubbling up on X recently. I think

Malcolm Collins: we saw this meme that’s like, “I’m just a normal- Yeah, the, the-

person from 1990” Yeah, the, the

Simone Collins: Rabbit Hole on X specifically posted this on X. Far right is just often a propaganda term for normal sent alongside a cartoon of a woman and man in a car with this woman saying, “Why are you so far right politically?” And the man saying, “I’m just a normal person from 1995.”

Speaker: We’re just normal men What do you mean normal men? We’re just innocent men. Eh?

Simone Collins: And Andy Hatfield also posted another meme under that that, that reads, “Recognize the warning signs of a far right extremist. Full-time employment, literacy, [00:02:00] loves his family and country, common sense, and obeys the law.” And,

Malcolm Collins: There, there was actually videos that were put together at one point.

Oh,

Simone Collins: really?

Malcolm Collins: I’m probably gonna be too lazy to look for them.

Speaker 3: Your son is not just lifting weights. He’s lifting the crushing weight of toxic masculinity. This is not fitness. It’s a silent scream for self-worth.

Malcolm Collins: But this became a thing where they were leftists- We’re creating warning signs if your son was being radicalized by the far right.

Simone Collins: Oh, are you serious? Like, that this is drifting off the thing? And it was stuff

Malcolm Collins: like... Yeah, it was stuff like, “Has he been working out more recently?

Has he started cleaning his room more?

Malcolm Collins: Has he-” Oh,

Simone Collins: no. No, no, no, no. No.

Malcolm Collins: I- I- yeah, no, actually it was like, “Has he started consuming less pornography? Has he started-”

Simone Collins: You’ve got to be kidding me ...

Malcolm Collins: Has he started playing less video games and working more? He might be being- No ... radicalized by the far right.” Oh, my God. Has he started... No, another thing that was cited was, like eating [00:03:00] healthy.

Like that was a, a warning sign. Like,

Simone Collins: I did... Oh.

Malcolm Collins: No, but the irony is, is that these are all actually pretty good warning signs-

Simone Collins: They are, they are legit good warning

Malcolm Collins: signs ... that a young man is being radicalized by the far right, right? You know. Oh, my God, Malcolm. He, he, they, if I, if I was a leftist and I saw my kid start exercising, I’d be like- No,

Simone Collins: then you know.

That’s how you know. It’s true. It’s, it’s actually true. That is, that is the funny part. Anyway though, Cremieux, who we love to follow think he’s a cool guy- just saw this post and decided to write a Substack article. He, in this, he broke from the sentiment-based memes around this subject and looked at the data.

Per his article, quote, “I opened up the general social survey and had a look around. To get started, I defined a few sets of political views: institutional confidence, criminal justice and guns, political tolerance, economic, pro-government, radical liberalism/civil rights, gender role egalitarianism, and sexual and moral liberalism,” and then I outlined a set of important soc- [00:04:00] social views.

I sent you, Malcolm, the graphs. I’m gonna put all the graphs and I’m gonna link to everything I’m talking about in the show notes for this on Patreon and Substack. But this is what he generally shows.

Malcolm Collins: I love Cremieux. He’s like a meme. A b- a friend of ours, by the way. I love him. You know, follow him on X.

A great, great right-wing tweeter. And he’s like, “Let’s break down the data. Let’s, let’s-” Yeah. Let’s look at

Simone Collins: it. But also, you know, his take is gonna be different from what I think a lot of people, even when you look at the discourse on X, ‘cause this ended up as one of sort of the trending topics that got surfaced as something on X, I think even just this morning as, as our time of recording.

What a lot of people assumed he was gonna be saying is not actually the conclusion that he reached after looking at the data, and I actually think he, he was missing important things in terms of the data he looked at. But anyway. Oh,

Malcolm Collins: oh, ooh.

Simone Collins: So the data shows that, and I’m just gonna quote his findings vis-a-vis all these things, but you, it’s better for you to look at the graphs, I think.

They, they really help to sort of hammer it home. And again, just go to Patreon and Substack. The data [00:05:00] shows that, quote, “People have become less comf-” Oh, my God, the screaming. quote, “

People have become less confident in America’s institutions over time. When it comes to criminal justice and firearms, people think courts are too harsh on criminals.

More people oppose the death penalty, and fewer people think they ought to require, Wait, and fewer people think we ought to require permits to buy guns. The last of these three didn’t change that much. Political tolerance has somewhat increased since the 1970s, but it’s somewhat down since the 1990s.

This general trend masks something interesting. More acceptance of gays and atheists, less acceptance of racists and militarists. Movement on economically left-wing views have been generally pretty flat, which is roughly what we see economically for right-wing views. And when it comes to racial liberalism, people have shifted far to the left.

People have become more likely to ascribe Black-white gaps to discrimination and less to a lack of effort, [00:06:00] among other things. And when it comes to gender roles, egalitarianism has greatly increased.” On this front, by the way our friend Diana Fleischman on X shared an interesting comment vis-a-vis this article that came out on, On postpartum depression for dads.

Specifically like a lot of people on X were like, “Oh, dads can’t have postpartum depression.” Like, that’s super screwed up, and like sort of gatekeeping around postpartum depression. And what she observed, and I think this is actually really astute, is that probably there’s a rise in postpartum depression specifically because while women have this sort of insane hormonal thing they go through-

Malcolm Collins: Yeah

Simone Collins: when babies are born, that, and I’ve, I’ve witnessed this, like actually makes them pretty tolerant of all the sleep deprivation and not super stressed about getting... ‘Cause I was super phobic about waking up in the middle of the night, for example before I ever had a kid, and in my, in my un- unparented life.

And now it means nothing to me to like get up at 1:00 AM, 3:00 AM, [00:07:00] like whatever. I don’t care. Like, I’m really not stressed about it, and I’m sleeping a lot less now. But I’m, it super doesn’t bother me. And when I sleep, I sleep more deeply. Men don’t have the same kind of hormonal balance or shift. Yeah.

And yet, these days, especially in, in like sort of educated progressive families, men are expected to like get up and, and, and feed babies in the middle of the night the same amount, or like be there for their wives when their wives are up and breastfeeding. In many cases, obviously not in all, but when they take a gender egalitarian approach to newborn care, men who did not go through this hor- whole hormonal revolution, who, you know, have not experienced this bodily change that has given them the ability to be more flexible in these ways, and it’s well documented that women’s brains go through a lot of changes and their bodies too, obviously hormonally as well that probably allow for this to be tolerable.

And again, I’ve experienced it personally and I didn’t believe it could be possible. Is it any surprise that men are getting depressed when they’re like thrown into like this situation that they’re not [00:08:00] equipped to handle? So anyway, I thought that was interesting. And then he writes finally, when it comes to sexual and moral liberalism, views on sex education, divorce, marijuana legality and so on have in some cases quite radically shifted towards leftward positions.

Abortion legality for serious defects is the only exception among the bunch. So he clu- he concludes however-

Malcolm Collins: Yeah So hold on, hold on.

Simone Collins: He concludes, and this is what’s most interesting that, that the nation has moved considerably but not overwhelmingly to the left. His editorialization on the issue is what can we say about the normal person from 1995?

In many ways he was much like us. In other ways, he was what most people now regard as kind of a dick. He didn’t like interracial marriage and he wasn’t too keen on gays either. These social views aren’t alone. Plenty of things now considered taboo were, at the time, wholly acceptable even in polite society, and sometimes these were the majority view.

Right or wrong, I don’t think appealing to normal people in the world 30 years [00:09:00] ago is likely to make many friends after realizing the sorts of things people used to believe. So I somewhat agree with him, but I also think that he’s not extrapolating sufficiently from the data. So when you look at one of the graphs about like sort of racial views let a racist speak has gone down in the general social survey.

But also the definition of racist has changed significantly, and that’s not gonna get picked up in this survey. So like it changed- Right ... in the ‘90s from something that like we would genuinely even today argue is blatantly racist to-

Malcolm Collins: Yeah ...

Simone Collins: like let a racist speak means let, let someone admit that like genetic differences might lead to a difference in skin tone as you personally, Malcolm, experienced when being interviewed by an MSNBC journalist last year.

Like that’s what- Yeah ... racism is now, and that’s not gonna get picked up by this general social survey. So what I think Krimuw is missing is that he doesn’t understand that you can’t look at the general social survey and take this data-focused approach to this [00:10:00] issue, though I love the premise, because the definition of the words have changed rendering the survey data inadmissible.

What I think was more compelling was what NC Physicist observed which is I think a much more compelling graph which I’ll also send you on X to look at, and I’m also gonna post in the show notes of course. So this Pew graph I think is a lot better at illustrating what has happened. What NC Physicist observed and wrote was, “What the left calls far right is just the left moving further left.”

Sharing a pretty illustrative graph showing a diverging median Democrats and median Republicans in 1994 to 2017. For those who are just listening, basically 1994, there’s a median Democrat and a median Republican basically-

Malcolm Collins: High degree of overlap ...

Simone Collins: shown.

Yeah, they’re very close. Like, the medians are like this.

And then when you go to 2017, the medians suddenly diverge significantly. They’re quite far apart. And the, the graph goes from looking like two mountains [00:11:00] almost next to each other to, like, two quite different mountains with a very significant valley in between the two of them. Mm-hmm. And I think that that’s, that’s more what has happened.

Malcolm Collins: Well, here’s what I’ve begun to notice. And I think that this ... When I talk to your average, like, older boomer progressive about most of my beliefs, they don’t see them as particularly extreme, right? They’re like, “Oh, those are really normal things to believe.” Until I get to something like, you know, my beliefs on trans people or something like that, and they’re like, “Well, you know, what, what, what about, like, their rights?”

And I’m like, “Well, what about the rights of, like, religious people or people who dis- disagree with this,” right? And they’re like, “Well, yeah, that’s not, like, an extremist position to take.” What they don’t realize is functionally this average person from 1995 is today in the eyes of the normal progressive an absolute radical, an absolute extremist.

And [00:12:00] I think what we on the right do not fully realize is how many people who vote Democrat would actually support us if you could just get through ... Like, as I pointed out, when the thing I was shocked about was only sorry, that 40% of Democrats think that gender transition is immoral, right?

Like, like, like, that is astonishing to me, right? Like, when, when you talk about those numbers there, right? It, the left ... And yet, and yet you could be fired from saying that from a mainstream job too, right? Like, that it’s one, both such an unpopular opinion among the masses, but two, that it’s seen as labeling you as an extremist, right?

And I think a lot of the conversation is about waking people up to this reality, right? You know, that-

That th- that everyone who is really still sane is on the [00:13:00] right at this point. There, there is not... Like, the, the leftist factions that, that control what’s left of, of the left, when they go out there at their protest and say, “Shoot a Nazi,” and then, and this is a frequent mainstream talking point on the left- No,

Simone Collins: the, the, it’s punch, punch a Nazi.

But yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Punch a Nazi. Assault a Nazi. Okay, great. This is a normal mainstream talking point on the left. It’s also a normal mainstream t- talking point that if you sit at a table with a Nazi, you’re also a Nazi. And it’s also a mainstream talking point that MAGA is Nazi, which by the way, over half of America’s voted for.

They, it is... W- when you take these together and you ask, why are there so many leftist mass shootings these days it, it becomes immediately obvious. It is normal for them to believe they have a license to kill the vast majority of Americans for different belief systems. And the moment you wake up a leftist often, often, like one of these sort of sleeping boomer leftists, this is what their party is [00:14:00] now.

I, I think a lot of them are like, “Oh, I guess I, I guess I’m MAGA.” But then they’re like, “But if anyone ever found that out, I’d, I’d lose my job, I’d lose my friends, I’d lose my...” ‘Cause that’s the way that the left operates at this point, right?

Simone Collins: Well, one thing I thought was also interesting from this discourse and some of the, the discussion that people had, is this tension between the idea of progress and people shifting cultural views in the face of just better evidence, like learning, getting better, just the idea of progressivism being a concept of society progressing and improving.

And, and, well, this tension of that with like, to- I wanna say toxic culture and messages that actually isn’t making society better. So, HF responded in this general, like, about this subject, “Society always changes and moves on. By definition, a progressive, someone on the left, is either ahead of or keeping up with those changes.

A conservative, someone on the right, wants things to stay the same and not change. Society always changes [00:15:00] and moves on. By definition, a progressive, someone on the left, is either ahead of keeping up with those changes. A conservative, someone on the right, wants things to stay the same and not change.” But Charles Pontificates pointed out that, quote, “It’s mostly leftists who want deindustrialization and the stagnation of energy production, and that’s hardly progress.”

And he shared a graph of electricity and income per capita that makes it super clear that there’s no such thing as a low energy rich country. And where I felt like there’s this tension is I mean, a lot of people are trying to argue in response to this whole like, “Oh, well, they’re just reasonable people.”

Malcolm Collins: Well, I, I think that that’s just fundamentally not what the left-right divide is anymore. Uh-huh. And I think that saying that conservatives... If you go to a conservative and you ask them, like let’s say the trans stuff. My opinion on transition was changed predominantly by changes in the scientific evidence.

Simone Collins: Oh, okay. That’s a really- like- Yeah, that’s a good example of like where the left isn’t progressing with modern science and [00:16:00] understanding. Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Right. Yeah, like with modern science it looks like the left should be- Or like

Simone Collins: climate change, right? Like, we learn different things about cli- But- And population is a good one, right?

Climate change, population. There was a belief

Malcolm Collins: that

Simone Collins: there were gonna be too many people, and now we know that we’re okay with a higher level of population. Okay.

Malcolm Collins: The right now is the side of data and statistics- Mm ... and, and c- climate realism and genetical re- realism, right? Like, we are the side that is engaging with information, and the left has just stopped doing that.

Simone Collins: Right. It- So this argument that it’s just that the left is the, is the, is the party of data and reality, and the right is, and conservatives are... I guess, and that’s maybe why we don’t call the it, the new conservatives. We call it the new right because-

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, because it’s not small C conservatives.

Simone Collins: Uh-huh. There are often- It’s not just go back to the old ways

y-

Malcolm Collins: quite radical people who are often open to a large diversity of ways of potentially fixing things.

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: And-

Simone Collins: Yeah ...

Malcolm Collins: the reason why it’s not just like go back to the old ways or don’t change is there isn’t just [00:17:00] like one unified image of the past that we’re fighting for anymore. It’s a better future that we’re fighting for.

And, and that obviously involves a lot of things. Like right now the right is a pro-AI party. The left is the anti-AI party. The right is the pro-nuclear party. The left is the anti-nuclear party. The right is the pro-genetics party. The left is the anti-genetics party. On almost every meaningful scientific i- issue

The, the right is the people coming to the, to the table with statistics. And when I talk about, like, with the trans stuff, it’s like, you know, if you follow the WPATH leaks or the data that the Travis Stark Clinic was hiding that you know, putting people on puberty blockers was increasing their unaliving risk, and now that it’s been banned in the UK, we haven’t seen any increase in unalivings in the UK, even within the trans community.

We now know that, like, the, the, those things are not true. And so now that we have that information, we can say, “Oh, we were wrong,” right? Like, the data that we were looking at was coming out of clinics that were making the majority of their money off of gender transition, which we’ve seen all of the pro-trans studies were.

[00:18:00] They had somebody involved whose life depended, life, livelihood depended on this being normalized, and that those institutions were covering up the data that was showing this wasn’t working. And we have historic evidence where a real... This happened in the past too, with Joe Money, right? Like, this is a repeated phenomenon, and when the phenomenon comes to light, you update your opinions, right?

We have changed our opinion significantly on a, you know, immigration because now if we look at the numbers, even three generations in,

Hispanic immigrants are over 50% on welfare, right? You know, you can’t support that, right? That eventually that ends up breaking the, the welfare system. They do not assimilate, right?

And with that being the case, and it’s, and it’s funny because, like, the leftists will even say, “Well, the goal isn’t assimilation.” If the goal isn’t assimilation, like, if you see that as a bad thing, them losing their heritage or, you know, culture, then we will become like the countries that they’re coming from, right?

Like, the, presumably the reason we don’t is it’s not that we have magic soil or something, it’s that [00:19:00] we see and perceive reality and ethics differently, and when they come to this perception, then they become productive like us, even if you are a blank slates. If you’re throwing that out the window, then we’re...

What, what conversation are we even having here?

Simone Collins: Yeah, this is really helpful for me because I, like I grew up just loving like the West Wing Democrat. Like this like we are patriotic, we love our country, we, we want everyone to thrive, we believe in science. That, that, like that’s the Democrat to which I anchored,

Malcolm Collins: And that’s what the right is now.

Simone Collins: I know. And, but like, but then I think there’s still a lot of people who remain Democrats today who still think that they’re West Wing Democrats, but they don’t... They hate America- ... and they won’t listen to science. And I’m, I, gets so confusing to me sometimes because we’re, I think we’re often confused of, or, or we’re, we’re being accused of being so something that we’re not.

When I think I’m, I’m certainly not the only person who is now on the right who [00:20:00] like grew up obsessed with West Wing Democrats because they’re wonderful. I love that show.

Malcolm Collins: Well, I mean-

Simone Collins: So that’s helpful. But, because I mean, what people kept saying is like, “Oh yeah? Yeah? Like well I’m just a normal person from the 1830s.”

Like do, is that where you, is that what you want? Is that what you want? Like you want Jim Crow? Is that what you want? And like, y- it, it just didn’t sit right with me.

Malcolm Collins: But this helps- Well, the reason why- ... sort of reframe it

Simone Collins: for me ...

Malcolm Collins: people say, “I’m just a normal person from 1995,” and it hits so hard for people in a way that

Simone Collins: these- 1995.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. When these people say, “Oh, I’m from the 1930s,” or whatever, is pretty much everyone agrees society, or at least America and Western countries, were demonstrably better in 1995, right? Like things were working better. There was less actual racism in our society, there was less you know, of the conflicts that we’re dealing with now as a society.

So when a person presents to you, “I am an average person from 1995,” m- people who hear that, the reason it’s effective is they’re like, “Yeah, let’s [00:21:00] go back to something that worked,” because this, what y- what we’re doing now, the left isn’t working.

Simone Collins: That Disney pastime is yeah. I, I really just need to wear my bonnet more. He’s going for it. But yeah, I that, th- this has been really helpful for me then because it’s, it’s helping me actually come to terms with this cognitive dissonance I’ve had around like the right being framed so readily as anti-progress, and even Cremieux being like- Yeah, the

Malcolm Collins: Cremieux-

Simone Collins: “Oh, the left hasn’t really changed” ... he’s a

Malcolm Collins: right-wing scientist. What’s he doing?

Simone Collins: Well, so this was a timed post, so I think maybe he was like, “I don’t know. Let’s see if the data backs it up.” And per the data he chose for this particular thing,

Malcolm Collins: Oh, he does that stupid timed writing

Simone Collins: thing ... that US general survey.

Yeah, I mean, like, ‘cause when that other person on X looked up the Pew results, like it’s very clear that there’s been a change. I think a lot of this comes down to definitions, but I think in that also is something interesting in that like it’s not necessarily that, [00:22:00] like, people’s reported views haven’t actually changed that much, and I think that’s meaningful.

It’s more that like maybe, maybe the radicalization is, is in definitions, is in like the way that people... The, the way that people have been radicalized, like the, the, the lobster or frog being boiled phenomenon had more to do with like not, not radicalizing people, but fundamentally and subtly changing definitions of like let’s just redefine you know, mental health as this, of of harm as no longer like physical assault, but of, you know, triggering someone, making someone feel bad.

You know, let’s, let’s r- reframe body positivity as not like, “Hey, you know, you don’t have to be perfect,” to like, “Oh, it’s okay to be morbidly obese and like deeply unhealthy.” Like maybe that’s where the, the societal harm or like the radicalization has taken place, and of course in certain measurement [00:23:00] formats that’s just not gonna show up.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I just think his entire framing is wrong about what, what, what conservatism is in a, in a modern context, like what the right is in a modern context. Because it’s, it’s, it’s not just like, wrong. It’s an inversion of reality.

Simone Collins: I think you’re right. Yeah, it, it’s still interesting. And I, I mean, I keep hearing that whole, like, 1995 Democrat thing bandied about. It is so striking to see these quotes from Bill Clinton that are like, “Hey,” like, “Let’s, let’s control our borders and, you know, curtail social services for, you know, immigrants in our, in our cities.”

And, and that being, like, just the same simple stance that our current president has, and yet such a different view of how they’re categorized even today. It’s, it’s wild.

Malcolm Collins: Well, I mean, I think the left back in the day was having a conversation where [00:24:00] the left and right had different values, right? But they both still wanted the best interest of the country, right?

And its people. And I think that now, very openly, the left is antagonistic towards the count- whatever country it’s in and its people. And this is, this is a fund- That means the conversation’s fundamentally different. They’re asking, “How can I destroy you?” We’re asking, “How can we build you up?”

Simone Collins: Yeah, maybe it’s connected to that, that sort of communist or, like, socialist Americans association plan that you de- outlined in a separate episode where they were like, “Okay, we’re gonna, you know, get people to collectively think that they’re super mentally unwell.”

You know, foment a- a- encourage the development of hideous art. Like, all these things. Maybe that’s kind of also it’s what’s happened is this collective plan since at least the ‘70s to basically make Americans hate America and be miserable, has also seeped in and taken over in a way that has been incredibly damaging.[00:25:00]

But I don’t know. You know- That’s, that’s more, what more or less what I wanted to discuss. This is, this is a short one, but,

Malcolm Collins: It’s a short one. Well, I mean, I think the thing that we need to get away from is the perception that we are... because in a way, yes, it is that we are 1995 Democrats, and that we are fighting with a collection of widely diverse people against the culturally dominant force, which at that time was the Judeo-Christian community.

And now it’s the urban monoculture. But I, I think outside of that, n- n- the, the two things don’t share that much in common. Like, the wider political ideology of, like, staffing the White House with a bunch of entrepreneurs and like, like, Founders Fund people and you know, actually cleaning things up, and I guess it’s...

But, like, everybody always kind of wanted the government to be and be doing who wanted a better future.

Simone Collins: But is it- I think actually Clinton had a, an effort similar [00:26:00] to DOGE.

Malcolm Collins: Oh yeah, he did. It

Simone Collins: was executed quite differently, but again, like, the similarities are insane. Plus, Trump at that very same time was a Democrat and openly known for being, like, a liberal Democrat public media figure.

So, like, I, I don’t know. I don’t know. I,

Malcolm Collins: I, by the way, fun, fun aside here, People have been talking about, and I, and I think that they’re right about this, about what was his name? Who, who’s the last president? Joe Bi- Hunter Biden. Hunter Biden running for office in a few years.

Simone Collins: Like- Oh, he’s on his comeback tour.

Yeah, I mean, I think the odds are long

Malcolm Collins: for anyone- He’s on his comeback tour. You know what? He could, he could I think do pretty well in terms of bipartisan support.

Simone Collins: Another glass ceiling. Yeah, you know?

Malcolm Collins: I mean, he’s a crazy crackhead, but he, he does it so he really captures the, what... Like, Gavin Newsom tried to do the Trump irreverent thing- Mm-hmm

and it didn’t work at all. Like, it looked so fake. When you know, Hunter Biden on, like, the Democrats’ main website has one [00:27:00] of his photos

with a crack pipe in his mouth- ... like, that is f*****g hilarious. That’s like, I’m not a Democrat, and I’m like, “That is hilarious that on the list of, like, who’s supporting who, you’ve got a, Hunter Biden with a crack pipe.”

Speaker 5: Here’s Hunter Biden reacting to this image. “ I know it may sound petty, but I can’t stand it when people Photoshop a meth pipe in my mouth. A crack pipe doesn’t have that little bowl at the end. This is why you can’t trust AI. Please make the appropriate edit. Thank you for your attention to the matter.”

Simone Collins: Well, in an age in which we’re just so fed up with inauthenticity, I think it’s one of the reasons why Trump did so well, is, like, Trump is exactly who- ... you think he is. He does not hide or try to obscure anything. Yeah. I mean, like, what- He’s proud of who he is, hides nothing. Hunter Biden is like, “Yeah, I did this.”

Like, it, it, like, the stories he told when he interviewed with Candace Owens were insane. And- Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Well, people are like, “Why, why aren’t you in, why aren’t you in jail?” And he’s like, “Well, my dad got me pardoned.”

Simone Collins: Yeah. Duh. Like-

Malcolm Collins: Like, what, what-

Simone Collins: Yeah, it, it’s super... And, and that’s, that’s, [00:28:00] that’s all we needed to hear.

You know, that just he’s not trying to virtue signal. He’s like, “Yep, that’s what happened.” Yeah, and then- And like, look at all this other crazy stuff. And I think especially, you know, in, with all the blowback that, that is arising in the face of, like, the Epstein revelations not being what we expected and all these things just not playing out the way we expected he’s got a lot going for him.

So yeah, if I- They should, yeah, they should just run him 20... I mean, it would be a tough run. Honestly- Yeah, running would be a tough run ... if it were Hunter Biden versus any of the... I mean, certainly, like Marco Rubio, there’s no way. There’s no way.

Malcolm Collins: Marco Rubio would struggle against Hunter Biden.

Simone Collins: Yeah, because Marco Rubio is all polished and perfect, and he looks like he’s hiding something.

He represents establishment. Yeah, I don’t, I don’t

Malcolm Collins: say, I don’t think Marco Rubio is a good candidate to run at all. Like, he comes across as very- I

Simone Collins: know, but people keep talking about him. I’m just

Malcolm Collins: saying ... people keep talking about him, but he just doesn’t, he comes off as so inauthentic c- compared- Yeah ... to, like, JD Vance.

Simone Collins: Right. But not everyone... Look, there are still many people who [00:29:00] weirdly want the inauthentic. They’re like, “Just give me my inauthentic politician and they have the authentic.” No,

Malcolm Collins: I just get that they have the opinion of Marco Rubio based on the things that he’s done in the administration, which I appreciate.

Simone Collins: Mm.

Malcolm Collins: And they have the opinion of JD Vance based on his history. I used to hate JD Vance for his whole Hillbilly Elegy and all that, and all his NPR-

Simone Collins: You didn’t even read it.

Malcolm Collins: No, but I saw his NPR apology tour. It was gross.

Simone Collins: Mm-hmm. Oh,

Malcolm Collins: okay. But when I listen to his speeches now and I see him talking now, and I know, “Oh, this is a guy who watches Asmongold.

This is a guy who knows Hasan Shocks his dog. This is a guy who is eviscerating the UK for, like, what’s happening there in angry social media posts.” And the UK’s are like, “We, how dare you say that the UK is a garbage country and, like, the people should revolt.” But, like, I don’t see that from Marco Rubio.

I’ve never seen a speech where, like, afterwards I was like, I wanted to cheer for him, or I felt, like, a connection with him. Mm. But, you know, that, that, that’s- We shall

Simone Collins: see. We shall see. But no, you’ve... Th- this has been an important conversation for us because at least [00:30:00] now I understand That there’s been a divorce between, from the concept of progressivism and actual societal progress, which requires a reconciliation with inconvenient scientific truths and, and just, like, realities.

Plus just a- adapting with science. A- and adopting science, to your point. AI shifts in our understanding of how to best contend with climate change just realities of, of genetic differences realities of gender transition not being what we thought it was. Yeah, all these things are a divorce from what the natural, like, progress of history is going to be.

Malcolm Collins: It turned out that, like, sleeping with whoever you want whenever you want doesn’t lead to positive outcomes,

Simone Collins: right?

Malcolm Collins: You

Simone Collins: know? Right. Right, right. And I actually think, like, yeah, truly a true progressive has to, by definition, change their mind because we are going to try new things as society evolves, and some of those things we’re gonna try out to not be so good.

Like, they’re gonna turn out to be kinda damaging. And it’s like, okay, well look, we tried that. It, [00:31:00] that, that is, like, the scientific method, right? You, like, hypothesis, and then you do an experiment, and then you see if your hypothesis is null or if, if the... You’re like, “Oh, okay, I was right. I was wrong.” Like, okay, now we need to adapt.

We need further research. And then you, you, you, you, you refine, you iterate. And a true progressive society must be iterative, and the left has become a lot less iterative. Whereas on the right what you actually see is what feels like a modern version of a much more broad and distributed academic framework of, like, different schools of thought actively competing and seeing how their experiments turn out.

It’s super cool. It’s like a bunch of people, like, all trying to cure cancer and being like, “Well, I’m gonna try this weird form of gene therapy.” “Well, I’m gonna try this weird mushroom derivative.” And, “I’m gonna try, like, this targeted, like, weird bacteria.” And, like, all these different groups are trying and seeing what works best, and then when a group discovers that, like, “Oh, my weird mushroom solution actually causes the cancer to grow significantly more,” guess what?

[00:32:00] They drop it. And then on the other hand, we have, like, this one group that’s like, “I only do this one therapy. This one therapy is perfect.” And then it turns out the therapy’s, like, totally killing people. But who cares? No, we only do this one therapy, and how dare you suggest anything else? Anyway, I’m going to go.

Assuming it would be good for you, ‘cause I know you’re not feeling really great, I was gonna make heavy, creamy, smooth mashed potatoes, but I need to go now.

Malcolm Collins: Oh, that would be great for today, yeah.

Simone Collins: Yeah. Okay, well then...

Malcolm Collins: Just mashed potatoes.

Simone Collins: Just mashed potatoes. I’m okay with that because the amount of cream and butter in them is, like, a little bit of protein plus a lot of, of fats, so I’m like, okay, fine.

I

Malcolm Collins: don’t eat that much. You know that, Simone,

Simone Collins: right? I know. But especially on days where you’re not feeling so well, I feel like creamy mashed potatoes. Like, I w- I want... I’m envisioning, it’s not gonna turn out this way, but I’m envisioning the kind that you get on the instant mashed potatoes- box where it looks like a snowy mountain at sunrise with a pat of butter slowly sliding down a beautifully whipped- I think with

Malcolm Collins: AI you’re gonna be able to make [00:33:00] great mashed potatoes.

Simone Collins: I, I pulled up a, a recipe and I... it looks good, so... with AI, of course.

Malcolm Collins: Remember to use rfab.ai recipe generator or-

Simone Collins: Yeah, it even creates really... Like, the images are also great motivation, ‘cause it shows you what you can get. And, and, like, pretty good, ‘cause you’re using Nana Banana for the images, and Nana Banana is, is the accurate AI image generator, whereas Grok is, like, the sexy, fun AI image generator.

So I like it.

Speaker 6: Or as a crazier feature, , and this one just came out, so it’s gonna be undergoing lots of updates. It’s got some stability issues now, but it’s a feature that allows you to search every not safe for work site that doesn’t have real humans on it, because I think that’s immoral, , at once. , So all of the, , not safe for work drawing sites can be searched simultaneously, and not just searched simultaneously, but from them you can, , download entire galleries with just a click, , without having to go through each individually with some, , useful [00:34:00] time-saving buttons like the no homo button, which just immediately removes all of the gay or male related tags from the search.

Or the, , English button, which instead of just searching for English, it searches for other languages, so you also get things without any, , language attached to them

Simone Collins: Yeah. Anyway.

Malcolm Collins: I love you.

Simone Collins: Off to potato land I go. God

Malcolm Collins: willing. Off to potato land I go soon enough.

Simone Collins: Hopefully. Yeah. We’ll see.

Malcolm Collins: All right. Bye.

Simone Collins: Bye. lap. He’s, he does this thing where he likes

Malcolm Collins: to- Okay. Roseanne

Simone Collins: Yes.

Malcolm Collins: We gotta make the AI waifu a, a thing. I think, I, I really wanna go harder with this. Like, the idea- Oh my God ... of, I, I, I wanna make it, like, even a meme on the right. I, I think it would be fun of you know, y- you, you can still... Being on the right doesn’t mean you can’t be, like, when I make sexy pictures of my AI waifu, which is just my wife done in, like, a Puritan AI anime style,

Simone Collins: You mean when you make AI pictures of [00:35:00] your wife waifu- Ah

not your actual

Malcolm Collins: fake wife. Yeah, yeah. Like, I do not understand, like, the people have gotten... It’s my wife, okay? Like, this is my property, okay? There is n- And it’s not like she’s semi-closed in these or something. It’s not like she’s you know, showing off some sort of sexualized asset like breasts or something.

You know, it’s literally my wife drawn in a way that is appealing enough to you, the watcher, you know, with, with yandere face or whatever, where you’re like, “Oh that, that, that’s, that’s We’re have- like, we need to be the side of fun, not the side of curmudgeonliness, okay? And I wanna put m- m- more pictures of myself.

I, I did some Duke of the North ones of, of me.

Simone Collins: Yeah, I wanna see those. Give me more of those.

Malcolm Collins: More of Otherworld Malcolm. More,

Simone Collins: more Malcolm fan art. That’s what I’m here for. Well,

Malcolm Collins: they had the, the fur on them, and I w- we were thinking about that

Simone Collins: before. Yeah, and I keep sending you those outfits, [00:36:00] and you just never wanna choose them.

You- Let’s

Malcolm Collins: get one. Let’s get one. I’ma b- make a note right now. No, you can’t. I will stay up late to find fur.

Simone Collins: No. D- you are going to bed tonight. You’re going to bed early, or you might discover that key electronics in your room have just started to disappear randomly.

Malcolm Collins: This is the way you treat our kids.

Simone Collins: It’s true, actually.

Malcolm Collins: But I mean, I mean, I wanna make it, like, a... I want it to be not just us, but I, like, want the wider community to... Because I think, you know, we did this with Emilia to an extent, right? But the problem with Emilia is if you’re an older woman, like, let’s say 40 or something like that, and you’re dressing like Emilia, or 35, 36, and you’re dressing like Emilia you’re gonna look like a creep or a, a loser, right?

Like, that, that looks try-hard and empathetic. Yeah,

Simone Collins: it’s so tried, yeah. Women need to dress their age. Let’s bring it back, people.

Malcolm Collins: We need to show that being a Christian mom is not uncool or unsexy. And, like, if [00:37:00] you were Jewish- you- Y- you could draw,

Simone Collins: like- They don’t have to be sexy. Let’s be clear. They can just be cool.

No,

Malcolm Collins: but th- women want to be desirable, and we do not have an archetype of a desirable woman with, like, five or six kids who tries to live a moral life. But there’s no reason we... We can fight asymmetrical warfare with the left because we can have sexy women and anime, right? So let’s buckle in and start fighting this.

You know, if y- if you’re Jewish, you can do, like, hot Hasidic women, right? You know, you can do the, the hot Hasidic family. Oh. The, you know, if, if you’re- And if you’re Christian, you know, post, post the, the, the, your, your wife. And I think that making it of, you know- Your wife ... your wife or, or your ideal wife if you don’t have a wife is, is also a fun way because you know it’s going to trigger the leftists soaking hard.

When they see- Yeah. Let’s do this ... us having fun, that’s gonna trigger them. Don’t let it trigger you, okay? We gotta, we gotta win this.

Simone Collins: All right. [00:38:00] Okay. As long as I get more Malcolm fan art, I’m down with it.

Malcolm Collins: Okay.

Simone Collins: I like, I like the Malcolm fan art you create for me. I mean, obviously I should be creating it too, I just don’t...

There’s no time for fun. There’s no time for anything. Gotta... Anyway, shall I start?

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, let’s get started.

Simone Collins: Okay.

Are the apples wet? They, they have a lot. All apples

No, no, apples are just naturally a bit wet, Toasty. Washed them in the sink to wash off the dust- Come on, Toasty ... that you’re always so worried about, right?

Torsten, eat an apple. What are you doing?

She didn’t lick them all

I want it back to zoo. It’s true I know it’s true. I, I promise you she- Jackson, you were-[00:39:00]

See, Tyne didn’t. That would be a really long thing for her to do, Josie You make her too much fun. We went in the-

In this episode of Bricks and Minifigs 2, Malcolm and Simone Collins break down the Coffeezilla investigation into the Bricks & Minifigs Lego controversy. They explain what Coffeezilla allegedly got wrong—especially around accounts payable, business acquisitions, liabilities, and ownership of consignment inventory.

Malcolm and Simone (experienced business buyers/sellers) dive into why the previous owner wasn’t being shady, how stock purchases transfer liabilities, why the “missing Legos” narrative misses the bigger picture, and the legal realities of taking over a business with existing obligations. They also discuss the broader saga, corporate responses, Brian Mansell’s history with the company, and why the focus should now be on properly resolving things with investigator Ben.

A must-watch for anyone following the Bricks & Minifigs drama, Lego collectors, business ethics enthusiasts, or fans of deep-dive investigations. What do you think—did Coffeezilla miss key business 101 details?

Episode Transcript

Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] you had watched the Coffeezilla piece and were convinced by it on Bricks and Minifigs. And- I mean- Oh my God, I thought that you with your business background would immediately see what he was getting wrong.

Simone Collins: What was he getting wrong?

Malcolm Collins: So there were two big things he got wrong. Okay. The, the really big glaring one is when he said the previous owner sold some of the sets without sending the money to the guy, right?

And yet we see from her own words when they’re doing the transition of ownership, she goes, “You’re going to-” Yeah,

Simone Collins: I’m worried about... Yeah. “

Malcolm Collins: You’re

Simone Collins: gonna close out-” And they, they’re like, “We’re gonna have some- That’s gonna get handled by someone else.”

Malcolm Collins: That’s what I heard. No, no, no. But she wasn’t worried about the inventory.

Mm-hmm. She, she was worried more about closing out the accounts.

Speaker 2: These are ones that haven’t-- he has not been paid his percentage yet, and if I don’t have the tickets, I won’t know how much I need to pay him. That, that’s a business thing and not necessarily yours. If, if taking on the business, he takes on all that comes on that [00:01:00] part.

Speaker 3: What’s extremely funny about this piece in retrospect is you can see that the person, if not the CEO, at least somebody at Bricks & Minifigs properly understood the law that when you buy a business, you take on accounts payable

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. What that means in business speak is she knew part of the money that was meant to go to him had been unpaid. Oh. And she’s like, “I need to go over my notes.” She even specifically says, “I need to go over my notes to see those amounts.” And then they say, “No, we’ll take on that responsibility.”

Simone Collins: Mm-hmm.

Malcolm Collins: This is a normal thing in business. Yeah. This isn’t her being shady. It’s not like-

Simone Collins: Well, that’s... When you acquire a company if it is not- an asset acquisition. If it’s a stock acquisition, you also acquire their liabilities

Malcolm Collins: Liabilities.

Simone Collins: And that, one of the liabilities- You acquire their liabilities

is your accounts payable, and that is accounts payable. Yeah. Yeah,

Malcolm Collins: that’s, that’s accounts... Th- this is the most 101 thing in business, and you were like, “Oh, there weren’t that many Legos in the store because she had sold some before,” and it’s like, n- that doesn’t, that doesn’t matter. And then the second thing- No,

Simone Collins: what, what Coffeezilla said is that, that I [00:02:00] thought was most notable was that the amount that’s sort of pending was much smaller than people thought.

It’s more, like, in the $20,000 range. That’s

Malcolm Collins: because he wasn’t inc- including the accounts payable in the amount pending.

Simone Collins: I thought that’s what the amount was, that the accounts payable- No ... oh.

Malcolm Collins: He was talking about the physical sets that were still in the store, because he didn’t seem to understand accounts payable.

Simone Collins: Hmm, I... Th- that can’t be. That’s too obvious.

Malcolm Collins: No, it’s obvious to you because you’re a business person. He very clearly, if you watch the piece, and he was calculating the amount of money that he said Bricks and Minifigs owed the , the guy, he just did an addition of all of the sets he could find in their inventory.

He didn’t- Oh ... include accounts payable, which would have, from what we’re hearing, maybe doubled that amount. So that was the first thing that really annoyed me.

Simone Collins: I just figured if that was the case, then they would have included, featured prominently in that particular investigative episode, Coffeezilla, I mean.

Like, i- she would say, “And the accounts payable amount was, like, $34,000.” She

Malcolm Collins: [00:03:00] literally says that. She goes, “I need to check my records so I can settle accounts with the people who have order-”

Simone Collins: Yeah, in, in... I know, from the recorded clip, but she doesn’t say how much that was. In the, in the subsequent interview that she had- Why?

In

Malcolm Collins: the subsequent... Because she’s being an idiot ...

Simone Collins: with Coffeezilla, she would have stated that amount. ‘

Malcolm Collins: Cause she’s being an idiot. But in the, i- when she’s having the store taken over, she literally says, “I need to settle the accounts,” implying there’s a large amount of accounts payable specifically to him.

Because, the,

Simone Collins: Then why has no one stated that amount?

Malcolm Collins: When we did our first episode, people were like, “Malcolm, it’s crazy that you saw things in this case that I just didn’t understand.” I think a lot of people are just ‘tards, Simone. That’s, that’s the, the- Well,

Simone Collins: no, but I mean, it, it, at the very le- oh, I guess the Brian, the original owner would not know the amounts because he wouldn’t have been aware, aware of what was sold and not.

Do you

Malcolm Collins: think Ben or Brian understands what accounts payable is? The, the, these-

Simone Collins: Yes, I, I imagine they do. But I also imagine they couldn’t know. Like, ‘cause i- if I’ve, if I’ve given something to a shop for consignment, I don’t know at any given day what [00:04:00] has sold and what hasn’t. Yeah. Like, there’s not... That’s just for us to know.

Malcolm Collins: Yes, which is why she said, “I need to check my records.” Okay. So that really annoyed me.

Speaker 4: Just so you understand why the law works this way, imagine if the law didn’t work this way and accounts payable magically disappeared or was transferred to the old owner of a business, , whenever the business changed hands. Now keep in mind, the owner of a business can be a business, , or not a specific individual.

So suppose, , one individual, , , , accrues a large amount of accounts payable in a business, , and they just then transfer that business to themselves for like a one dollar sale, right? , And they say, “Oh, all the money that I owed people with this business...” , N-no, or let’s not say themselves. Let’s say their brother.

, They say, “All the money this business owed immediately disappears because it transferred hands.” , That would be completely stupid. , Th- that would be like the easiest business trickeroo in the world. Like, it’s very obvious why n- you cannot have the law work this way

Malcolm Collins: And then the second thing that really annoyed me- ... that we can go further on-

Simone Collins: Oh,

Malcolm Collins: [00:05:00] God. Crap ... is they keep focusing on whether or not she, she had the right to enter into the consignment deal, which is just totally irrelevant to any of the facts of the case.

Whether or not she had that... So think of it this way, Simone. Uh-huh. Suppose I own a garage right? Or let, let’s, let’s make this different. I’m leasing a garage from somebody else, okay? To make this even clearer. And then I use the garage I’m leasing in violation of the terms of my lease to do what, what do you what do you call that where you, like, pay somebody to s- park your car for you at, like, restaurants?

Well, I d- I don’t know the term. You pay somebody at a restaurant to park your-

Simone Collins: Valet ...

Malcolm Collins: valet. Okay, yes. So I use it for valet storage in violation of the agreement, right?

Simone Collins: Oh.

Malcolm Collins: Then the owner comes back and they go, “You didn’t have the right to run valet service here.” So then what they do is they take possession of...

Because I’m only subleasing the asset, right? They [00:06:00] retake possession of the garage, and then they turn around and start selling all of the cars that I had been- Yeah,

Simone Collins: like you parked a Ferrari and they’re like, “So this is mine now.”

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, they’re like, “This is m-”. That is not remotely how the law works.

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: You don’t take possession of an asset- Mm

, Just because it’s in a location that you took possession of.

Speaker 5: Again, to understand why it would be comical for the law to work this way, suppose I owned a, , storage locker that I rented to someone, and then the moment they moved in all their stuff, I then went to, , my brother, and I sold the storage locker to my brother. And then he now said, “Now I own everything in the storage locker.”

Or I own a, a hotel, and I wait until a bunch of really rich people come there for a trip, and then I sell it to somebody, and, , now they own everything. All you would need to do to ste- legally steal stuff from somebody is to own something where you expected something of high value to go across, and then [00:07:00] immediately sell it to somebody who you’re close with the moment the person with high value walks across a w- five-foot square of land that you own

Simone Collins: Yeah, I wonder how the law works with that. Like, if someone puts stolen goods or, like, someone else’s goods

Malcolm Collins: in your home. No, it’s, it’s, no, it’s not how the law... It’s the clear... Okay, so m- suppose I walk into a building and I set a, a, a diamond ring I own on a table in the building.

Yeah. And then that building sells. The person who buys the building doesn’t own my diamond ring. There’s

Simone Collins: no finders keepers law?

Malcolm Collins: Y- that’s not remotely how it works. That wasn’t included in the assets of the purchase. It wasn’t neg- And this is all laid out when you make a purchase of a company.

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: But yeah, sorry, that really gets me as well, but it continues.

Simone Collins: How does US law work with ownership of lost items? For example, if I lose a diamond ring at a restaurant and someone picks it up Are they legally in trouble for not giving it back to me if I [00:08:00] return to the restaurant and say, “It was mine”? What does that

Malcolm Collins: have to do with anything?

Simone Collins: I’m just curious about it.

‘Cause now I’m just curious about finders keepers law. It’s not a law. It’s not a law. I’m just wondering like-

Malcolm Collins: This is the... I mean, it’s clearly how the Bricks & Minifigs guy think the law works

The, the, the principle of finders keepers

Simone Collins: So b- basically property is yours unless you abandon it. A finder- Yeah ... generally has a right to possess an item that is good against everyone except the true owner. Okay, so there is kind of a finders keepers. But they have to give it back to the true owner if the owner can prove owners- so there kind of is a s- a finders keepers law.

Malcolm Collins: No, if the owner can prove ownership. Mm-hmm. Which the original contract proves that the person that they

Simone Collins: took the property from- Yes. No, 100%, yeah. W- yeah, with, with bricks and minifigs, of course. That’s, that’s obvious ...

Malcolm Collins: didn’t have ownership

Simone Collins: Yeah, and then it’s a civil issue if you refuse to give it back. Interesting Mm. Many systems distinguish lost from [00:09:00] mislaid, AKA, like, deliberately set down or forgotten. Property left on the premises is often treated as mislaid. Huh. Law is so interesting. I totally can understand why that one famous housewife women write to work, like, female equality... What was her name?

She has a, a difficult to pronounce, unflattering style name who became a lawyer.

Speaker 6: Note here, , while I say I w- don’t hold it against, , Coffeezilla for not understanding accounts payable, , maybe he did understand it and it just slipped his mind in this case because he has done really complex financial stuff into some of his other videos. So it’s, it’s almost sort of baffling to me that this wasn’t just like immediately top of mind for him.

But maybe -- he knows what accounts payable is, he just doesn’t know what happens with accounts payable during a business transaction, ,

Like even if she was being shady, even if the accounts payable she had had accrued for a year or two years, it would still transfer to Bricks and Minifigs. , It’s, it, it’s [00:10:00] irrelevant.

Although it appears very clearly that she wasn’t being shady because she specifically asked for her books before being kicked out to ensure that she did make the payments to him

Speaker 2: These are ones that haven’t-- he has not been paid his percentage yet, and if I don’t have the tickets, I won’t know how much I need to pay him. That, that’s a business thing and not necessarily yours. If, if taking on the business, he takes on all that comes on that part.

Speaker 6: because very few people... Simone and I have bought businesses before. That was our job in the past, to buy and sell businesses, which is why this is so incredibly salient for us and just seems like the simplest thing in the world.

, Which it should have been for the Bricks and Minifigs corporation. , And it seems to have been, because when the guy was making the transaction, he explained to her accurately, “When you do a acquisition, we take on the accounts payable.” , “That’s a business thing,” as he said. You know, that’s a, you know, simple understanding.

, Second here is, i-it’s not that Coffeezilla did nothing in their video. They did some really cool work. It was really cool when they showed the guy that he had all [00:11:00] this stuff in his own corporate records from his own corporate Google Drive, and the guy was like, “What?” And then, oh my God, that’s so cool, the, , U-Haul thing was really neat

Speaker 9: See the window, but the problem is it’s night outside, so you can’t see. And so I’m looking at everything I can, and there’s just nothing, you know? And I have this alternate angle, I’m looking at that. And then wait a minute. Zoom in on that photo. Bring up the brightness of this photo a little bit and my gosh, there’s a U-Haul in the parking lot right outside of the store the night of November 14th, 2024.

This is something that Matt said he had seen footage of, and it couldn’t be true. And again, I, I believe I have seen footage from that night that shows clearly out into the parking lot, and there’s no U-Haul. After seeing this, I said, “I really have to make a call.” And that’s when the story changed. So last night I talked with Matt McNeff.

I brought up this question of the U-Haul. He told me [00:12:00] emphatically there was no U-Haul. Y’all came to me this morning. You said, “Hey, we looked into it. There actually was a U-Haul there that night.” Can you clear up what that’s about?

Simone Collins: Actually, it, it is a good idea to do the, the Lego mini fig one, just to give people an update on what everyone’s missing, because that’s actually what everyone’s missing.

Yeah,

Malcolm Collins: I was, I was so annoyed by the Coffeezilla piece on it. I was like, it, it did- they’re obviously talking about keeping accounts payable, and the other company, you take on accounts payable. That is normal when you acquire a business. That is like Business 101

Simone Collins: If you do a stock purchase, the question is,

Malcolm Collins: we- we- If you do a hostile takeover of a store, you obviously take on that asset.

You, you take on liabilities and assets. If y- during a hostile takeover, you absolutely do.

Simone Collins: Yeah, I don’t know. I don’t know how it legally works with franchise agreements, like, how the corporate entities are related

Malcolm Collins: or not. Here’s another way to put it, Simone. It doesn’t matter how you took over a company.

If that company had a bunch of stolen [00:13:00] goods, goods that were legally not theirs in a storeroom- Yeah ... you don’t all of a sudden own all of those stolen goods just because you own the company now. Mm. That is functionally what the company did. They said, “Your paper only proves that the woman who we took over the store from didn’t own it.”

It’s like, no, it proves that you don’t own it because you only acquired her assets. Mm-hmm. You didn’t acquire other people’s assets simply because they happened to be around. That is the wildest thing ever. Like, I ... To think that you o- like, when you think about it with the stolen stuff, I think it becomes so much more clear.

To think that, “Oh, I bought a warehouse full of stolen goods, now I own all of the stolen goods,” everyone would be like, “W- no.” Or even worse, right? Somebody was renting a, a, a storage locker from me and stole a bunch of goods, and they defaulted on their payment so I took all of those goods. It’s like, th- that’s not how this works [00:14:00] at all.

And you’re like, “But it was illegal for them to have the goods there in the first place.” And I’m like, “That does nothing to help your case.”

Simone Collins: So you think for proper resolution, the accounts payable just needs to be paid out to this guy?

Malcolm Collins: Well, no. But the framing of the Coffeezilla where he tried to make it seem like it was over a very small amount of money, and that’s the- Yeah, I

Simone Collins: guess his framing, if I recall correctly, was just, like, the, the big thing is where are the missing Legos?

They either were stolen by a disgruntled employee or

Malcolm Collins: one of these- No, that’s literally not the thing, and that’s what I’m trying to explain. No, no,

Simone Collins: no. I, what I’m, what I’m trying to do is recap what his argument was, and I think that’s what his argument

Malcolm Collins: was, right? And it’s a stupid argument. We know where the missing Legos are, functionally speaking.

They were either sold in those early books, or they were inherited by the store. What he uncovered is that the vast majority of the money to be paid for this guy may not have been in the Legos in the store, but in accounts payable. Mm. That doesn’t mean the [00:15:00] previous owners did anything wrong. The, w- basically we know where they were.

They were sold. And we know the previous owners didn’t do anything wrong because we have the video where she explicitly says, “I need the books to settle my accounts.” Settling your accounts means paying out accounts payable. That’s what that means. They said, “No, don’t settle your accounts. We will manage it.”

That, that is, that was literally them. And then somebody could say, “Oh, that’s a low-level employee saying that,” or something like that. That low a level, even if it was a low-level employee, when they took custody of the books which managed what had gone out and what hadn’t gone out without going through with her, as you always do during a biggest acquisition, and she was trying to be nice in those videos and stuff like that.

Like, she was literally like, “Hey, let’s get on the same page about the accounts payable, about the the, the co- consignment stuff.” And they’re like, “No, I don’t want to get on the same page with you.” Mm. Because they knew, I think functionally what happened is they knew that the way they were shutting down the store was very immoral- Mm

and they felt really uncomfortable about it. So

Simone Collins: they- [00:16:00] Oh, like, “I’ve been told to do this. I’m just doing my job. This is corporate.” Yeah. Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. They basically knew corporate had sent them to do something absolutely demonstrably immoral. And so even though she was willing to, and we see in the videos, obviously willing to talk them through everything they didn’t want to be talked through everything, right?

And that, that is on them. If I since, so like, if they’re like, “Oh, that’s a low-level employee. He doesn’t represent corporate or anything like that,” it’s not even the fact that he affirmed to her, “Oh, I know what’s in these books.” Corporate at any point could have gone back to her to get better accounting, and it appears that they never tried, right?

And it appears that she wanted to give them the better accounting. What corporate does, if I send let’s say I send an employee, and the employee is the one who actually shuts down the storage locker that’s full of stolen goods, right? That doesn’t mean that I, of a [00:17:00] company, am now not legally responsible for the fact that those goods are stolen and need to get back to their rightful owner.

Even if it’s an employee who shuts down the garage that’s full of cars that somebody had you park for them, right? That, that doesn’t absolve corporate from the basic financial accounting responsibility of determining the ownership of the assets of the property, especially when multiple people are telling you these assets are not what, you know...

Speaker 14: And a day or so ago, corporate released a, their timeline of events, and their timeline of events clearly shows that from nearly the very beginning, they were very aware of this consignment Lego set. So they can’t say, “We were unaware that she didn’t own this.”

Malcolm Collins: and the thing that always gets me is they keep saying, “We tried to give Brian Mansell all of this in the past.” Mm. Why can’t they provide proof of that? That would be very easy to provide proof of. Presumably it’s in an email, right? Emails are easily recorded. So [00:18:00] if they don’t have that email, then I don’t believe that.

And I don’t understand why they haven’t presented that email of them trying to give them back in the past. It seems like an obvious lie. But also one thing

Simone Collins: that- There’s, the, there’s disorganized stuff on both ends. Like, why did the original franchise owner s- provide spreadsheets of records so late as well.

I don’t know.

Malcolm Collins: Well, so the other thing that we’ve learned since the, the co- well, this was before the Coffeezilla piece, but he didn’t include it, is the way that Brian Mandzel originally acquired Bricks & Minifigs was through, in a really scammy way, suing his father for control of a company that his father had built.

And it appears that pretty much since day one, Bricks & Minifigs has been bleeding money. So he basically- Oh ... stole his father’s assets and used that to build his pet project company that he has never been able to get financially stable, truly. And that might also explain why they cared so much about such a small amount of money.

One, they’re just not good at their jobs, and then two, they feel [00:19:00] really pinched on money.

Simone Collins: Right. They, they actually- When you, when you- ... don’t have the money.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, like when you look at his house, when you see, you know, his, it, it doesn’t look like a house with someone with that much money, right? So it, it may have been that’s why he felt pressured to steal this stuff, but it’s still stealing.

Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah. Well, and I mean, also, if the company’s not immensely profitable- You know, it, it probably isn’t run well. They don’t have good records, like all that kind of thing. You know, like it’s not... It’s just kind of falling apart, so. That, that makes sense.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah.

Simone Collins: Poor things.

Malcolm Collins: Anyway r- I mean, not poor th- th- the CEO’s not a poor thing.

He seems like a truly evil person. The, the way that he’s acting and the way that he’s responding, that he still has Ben under a gag order, you know, that’s why I have to release this episode. Mm-hmm. Maybe, maybe you can let Ben talk, right? This isn’t a normal thing to do in the world of YouTube, and I think he thought talking down to a YouTuber, he didn’t realize in the world of the actual world today, YouTubers are significantly more powerful than these big CEOs who think [00:20:00] they can talk-

Simone Collins: No, that’s why he did that.

He did that because he was getting severe amounts of harassment because

Malcolm Collins: of everyone getting his talk. Well, yeah, but cutting down the YouTuber only makes it worse. He needs to basically get on his hands and knees and beg the YouTuber. He

Simone Collins: can- Well, he doesn’t seem to understand that ...

Malcolm Collins: you know, he made- He thinks he

Simone Collins: can shut it down

Malcolm Collins: Brian, like everything with Brian. It’s like it’s not Brian you need to settle this with anymore. It’s Ben you need to... It’s Ben who you need to prostrate yourself to. And I know that that hurts your ego, but fundamentally, that’s the only way this gets right. But

Simone Collins: anyway. Sorry. No, no, no, it’s not Ben. It’s Brian.

Malcolm Collins: No, it’s Ben. It’s Ben. It’s the YouTuber that the CEO needs to be prostrating himself to, not the old man. He thinks he can make this right with the old man because it’s no longer about bricks and minifigs. The core issue now- Oh,

Simone Collins: it’s, it’s about the cover-up ... is

Malcolm Collins: about- It’s destroying

Simone Collins: FanTheFacts ...

Malcolm Collins: the way that he tried to stifle Ben’s investigation and Ben’s honest efforts to try to get this, and then tried to destroy Ben’s life through jail time, through these court [00:21:00] cases.

These are targeted, personalized court cases, right?

Simone Collins: That’s true. He

Malcolm Collins: could choose not to do this, but he didn’t. So, no, absolutely. It is... And this is what he’s getting wrong. He needs to get Ben to accept his apology to even begin to get anywhere with this, not Brian. Ben is his problem here. Ben- Mm-hmm

is not some kid anymore. Ben is the victim in everyone’s mind, and the core victim in everyone’s mind.

Simone Collins: Well, especially the way he filmed that I can’t talk anymore video against this dark hostage style background. But anyway- Yeah ... I have to go get the kids. I love you so much.

Speaker 12: What needs to be done next? What does that say? It’s saying we gotta use the wrong screwdriver to do it. Oh, no. It’s okay. Where did the wrong screwdriver go? I see a screwdriver right there. I’m [00:22:00] talking about the wrong one. See? There’s a Phillips head and a flathead. Do you know the difference between the two?

Speaker 13: What? One has an X at the end and the other one has a line at the end. I don’t- The one with the red handle- Oh, here’s, here- That’s a wrench. Oh. Oh, here’s, here

Speaker 12: you go, Tayn. This is the thing. Wait. Yeah, Octavian, it’s true that screwdrivers and wrenches are easier. No. Like, if you use that to turn- No, I don’t ... the screw in. Hey

Malcolm & Simone Collins sit down with Nux Taku for an epic, wide-ranging conversation on the evolution of the online right, anime-to-politics pipeline, faith, culture war, and building a better future. From hentai reviews to biblical literalism, technopuritanism, abortion, consent morality, AI, demographics, and why the right feels like the “fun side” — this is one of the most unfiltered and insightful collabs in the nerd/tech right space.

Topics include:

* The journey from 4chan/anime degen culture to political commentary

* Why repentance & forgiveness are biblical traits that define the right

* Critiques of consent-only morality, abortion, and leftist degeneration

* Optimism, family, pronatalism, and raising based kids

* Conspiracy theories, Candace Owens lore, and truth-seeking

* AI, progress, and performative subversion on the right

If you enjoy Based Camp, Nux Taku, or discussions blending anime, theology, and red-pilled culture — hit like, subscribe, and share!

Episode Transcript

Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone and Nux. This is the collab that was promised 3,000 years ago. We are so excited to be here with you. And what I wanna go into with Nux is exploring the evolution of this sort of new online culture that we share that has become, I don’t know, the nerd right, the tech right, the new right, whatever people wanna call it.

Because if you were to go to me five years ago, right? E- even five years ago, I mean, imagine 10 years ago, and you’re like, “Okay, so who are, like, the right-wing thought leaders on the internet?” And it’s like, “Well, the one we’ve got on now is a, a Jewish VTuber who used to do hentai reviews.” “... And then we’ve got fox girls.

We’ve got, like, five fox girls.” And I’d be like, “Are they furries?” And they’d be like, “No, they’re not furries, but they are fox girls. And then we’ve got, like, this slime girl, but it’s very important that you know that she’s a chimera slime. Then we’ve got Commie Mommy,” and people would say- Elf

Simone Collins: slime. Yes.

Malcolm Collins: Simone, am I not coming through?

Simone Collins: No, no. Just elf and slime girl. Like, it’s

Malcolm Collins: chimera. Oh, elf and... Oh yes, I’ve [00:01:00] got to get it right. Yeah. So Commie Mommy, and then people would be like, “Well, she, she can’t actually be, like, a socialist.” No, she’s actually a socialist, and she’s well-liked within our community.” And then it’s like, and then you got the top of the, the, the pack, and it’s this guy who, who lives like a homeless guy.

And I’d say to myself, like I’d be like, “Lives like a homeless guy? How does he not have any money?” It’s like, “Oh, no, he has tremendous amounts of money. Tremendous amounts.” But it’s so weird, this sort of world, and it’s a path that is not... Like, we, we in the past have tried to trace it from, like, the early online atheist communities to, like, the anti-feminist communities, then to, like, the anti-woke communities, and then to the modern right, and then it sort of, like, combined with parts of the red pill.

But you represent a different strand which comes out of the anime degen 4chan world, which we also come from as well. And I wanted to take this to sort of explore this journey, you as one of the leading content creators who sort of lived it, [00:02:00] and how your mind changed and the various points you had major inflections.

Nux Taku: Yeah, no, it’s de- it’s definitely a weird a weird area on the internet, for sure. I, I don’t know. For me it was, for me it was like, “Wow, I, I like making fun of retards and most of the retards are in politics. We have to start doing that.” I mean, that was the, that was kind of the thought process. Among other things, for sure.

I mean, I have to say, one of my biggest inspirations was Hasan Piker shocking his dog. That was, that was huge for me personally. Like, I, I’m like, this guy, he’s very well accepted in like the, the streamer world. You know, the, the pop culture. And I’m like, you know what? I, I want it to be as uncomfortable for radical leftists as for radical right-wingers.

Mm-hmm. And that’s what I did. I dedicated... And now no one wants to collab with Hasan. You know? Hasan was on The Ben Shapiro Podcast and no one wants to touch him anymore. You know, they got obliterated for it.

Malcolm Collins: You, you did a great job nuke- I mean, the JD Vance was like, “Oh yeah, of course. You know, the dog shocking guy, right?”

Like. It’s [00:03:00]

Nux Taku: cinema. It’s amazing. Yeah. The we-

Malcolm Collins: I actually

Nux Taku: think- I, I think- Okay,

Malcolm Collins: take it ...

Nux Taku: no, I think putting, making the face of the left like, you know, dog shocking, you know, womanizing, brothel enthusiast, terrorist supporter, that’s like the face of the left and it’s like, you wanna be on that side? So like you mentioned- You have, and I

Malcolm Collins: love that like on our side you have Asmongold, who literally, I don’t know any other human who would do this, doesn’t kill a cockroach growing, crawling on him, picks it up.

Who is that nice to a cockroach? Who is that pathologically nice? All right. And then leads it outside, right? And Hasan’s shocking his dog. But I think-

Nux Taku: Okay, I think, I think you’re taking the, the Asmongold thing like, a, a... It’s like, loves cockroaches, supports like late term abortions, right? That, that’s Asmongold.

You know? It’s-

Malcolm Collins: He still-

Nux Taku: You got a lot of interesting characters out

Malcolm Collins: here ... does Asmongold support late term abortion?

Nux Taku: Asmongold, he supports abortion a moment before birth. He supports it.

Malcolm Collins: Oh, really? I did not know that. We- Yeah. It’s interesting ... we have changed our views on abortion significantly recently.

There, there was a recent video on that.

Nux Taku: Really?

Malcolm Collins: People [00:04:00] should watch because it was the craziest video ever. It starts with a gang bang where like people got together

Simone Collins: and then- It starts with a, yeah, basically you know about Aila’s birthday gang bang, right?

Nux Taku: Who?

Simone Collins: Oh my God. So Ayla, a very famous sex researcher for her birthday one year in like 2024, so a bit ago I think decided to have a, a gang bang for her birthday because that’s how one celebrates in certain circles in the Bay Area with 42 men.

And one of her friends who helped to organize her organize it met her now future husband and, and father of her child at this gang bang. She was a fluffer. But, but, but

Malcolm Collins: in

Simone Collins: between- But she had this really terrible,

Nux Taku: Wait, y- you called her a sexual researcher?

Simone Collins: She is. Is that like a nice way to say a w***e?

She possesses some of the world’s best- Like, I’m trying to figure

Nux Taku: this out.

Simone Collins: No, so she, she has probably

Malcolm Collins: the world’s best data set. If you’ve ever seen those data sets of kinks and what they correlate to and like how they c- cross correlate, the trans community hates her ‘cause she always just says whatever she thinks is true. Yeah. We’re not promoting her lifestyle. But anyway, in between, in between this party [00:05:00] and her friend getting married she had this horrible abortion experience that she wrote about that radicalized a lot of people like us, because before I was like, “Well, u- up until they have neurons I’m okay with it.”

And now I’m like, “No, not even then.”

Simone Collins: Yeah, it’s,

Nux Taku: Look so- You should check it out ... so one thing, I, I hear you guys discuss a lot, like, your philosophy. I, I don’t remember. You have, like, a name for it.

Malcolm Collins: Hmm.

Nux Taku: It’s, like, about having lots of peers. Technopuritanism.

Malcolm Collins: Like, Evan- It’s

Nux Taku: our- Technopuritanism ... it’s

Malcolm Collins: our crazy religion.

Nux Taku: Okay. All right. Could, could you describe it in a few sentences, and then I’ll, I’ll let you know my... Like, i- if this is still part of the previous conversation.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah. Well, okay, okay, I’ll, I’ll, I’ll, I’ll say it before we go on with this, ‘cause one thread I wanna pick up on what you said earlier, and then I’ll get into this really quickly is you were saying you liked making fun of retards on the internet.

And I think in reality- Passion ... this was what was the through line between these various communities. If you go back to the very early days, where you had the people who are now, like, right-wing influencers who back then were, like, atheist influencers or whatever, right? [00:06:00] They just liked dunking on anyone they could see as, as stupid, and then they started to feel like the Christians aren’t as fun to dunk on as the feminists.

And then they started to be like, “Oh, the wokies are the most fun to dunk on,” or the Tum- the Tumblr people are. And it drove sort of this political chain. But as for us and our theological beliefs, the quickest version is we think that the... We have a biblically literalist reading of the Bible that is materialist and monist.

Meaning that we a, a, we think that when the Bible says in the distant future humans are gonna be raised again that it’s talking about like, a, a, a super advanced entity in the distant future that is all-benevolent because humanity keeps evolving a billion years from now. And wants to give everybody who lived a virtuous life as long of a good life as possible, so it resurrects them.

And we try to go through. And we’re literalist, too. Like, we try to take the, the, go through all the translations and show how it could mean this. It’s crazy, I know.

Simone Collins: I think more succinctly, it’s, it’s an accelerationist tech-forward, [00:07:00] descendant worship religion that is based on a literal interpretation of the Bible

Nux Taku: Interesting.

Wow. Okay. So I, I thought it was a lot more like materialist focused, right? Like, you know, we want- It is ... humanity to survive, so therefore... No, no, I obvious- so I think that if you follow the Bible, it’ll have the best outcome for your life anyway, right? So- Yeah ... even if you were, like, the ultimate atheist, you know, utilitarian, you should still follow the Bible because it’ll give you the best lifestyle regardless.

Malcolm Collins: Th- that’s one of the things that we, we did a video recently when I was like, being an adult is recognizing that sins are just, like, a list of things that will F up your life. It’s basically like God gave us a list of like, you know, don’t, don’t cheat on your wife. You know, don’t, don’t have gang bangs.

Don’t-

Nux Taku: Okay, so-

Malcolm Collins: you know, ... I

Nux Taku: don’t wanna, I don’t wanna- ... murder ... correct you here or anything. I don’t, I don’t mean to cor- there is no Bible verse saying don’t cheat on your wife.

Malcolm Collins: Oh, okay. No, th- there isn’t because in- I, I’m just saying ... early Judaism you could have multiple wives, and we talk about that.

[00:08:00] Correct. You’re absolutely right. But, Correct ... I’m sure there’s some line you could take to mean that. But the point

Nux Taku: being is that- Yeah. You know, don’t be, don’t be adulterous. I mean, I guess you could, you could read into that.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah. I, and I actually agree with you on this. We point, we have whole episodes on the Bi- the, the when monogamy became a norm in Judaism.

But I don’t wanna... Th- that’s a, that’s a tangent. But the point being is, like, it’s just a bunch of stuff that’s gonna make your life worse. And it, it, as an adult as a kid I always felt like, oh, sins are things that are tempting, right? And it’s like humanity was given a list of like, don’t piss on the electric fence, and then immediately, like, a big portion of us just went immediately and pissed on the electric fence.

Because, I don’t know, we’re, we’re not supposed to do it or something

Nux Taku: Yeah, I suppose. But yeah, no, I, I agree with that. I actually think that morals come from there actually, you know. And, and in regards to Asmongold, like, I think Asmongold’s a really honest guy. So when, when I discuss the whole abortion thing, why my view has never changed really on abortion is ‘cause it says thou shalt not murder in the [00:09:00] Bible.

All right? So regardless, if, if a fetus is a human life, then killing it is murder, so therefore it’s bad, you know? So- And, and... Yeah? Sorry. No,

Malcolm Collins: so you’ve always had these views? Like all the way back to your early

Nux Taku: days or did you- Okay, so even in my early days, yeah, I had these views for sure. I, I definitely fleshed them out, my faith got a lot stronger.

But you know, basic stuff like don’t murder and don’t steal are pre- pretty consistent I think.

Malcolm Collins: Well, no, it’s, it’s very interesting because what I’m realizing from this conversation is a big part of the online transition has been people not coming to views they didn’t have historically, but feeling comfortable talking about them.

Nux Taku: Exactly. Exactly. A-

Malcolm Collins: actually, the irony is that you were less at risk of being canceled talking about pure degeneracy, like Metamorphosis or something like this- Absolutely ... than saying you shouldn’t have abortions.

Nux Taku: 100%. That, that, that’s the thing. The entire online space, be- it became super comfortable to hate God.

And it became super comfortable to follow, you [00:10:00] know, if you look at like leftist policy, it’s like a checklist of what Satan would tell you to do. You know? It’s like, you know, abort your babies and groom children and castrate them and, you know- Well- ... take money from people that earn it and give it to people that don’t.

I- that’s the list.

Malcolm Collins: And look at the toll that it leaves on these people. It’s not like they’re... I- if you look at like GDC and you see the people screaming at the sky, right? Like, that’s not a normal response. Like, that is somebody who’s had everything good taken from them in their life, and it’s

Nux Taku: really- Okay, but define normal.

Define normal. Sure. Y- your, the, your barometer only operates ‘cause you have a belief system. See, I define normal and morality based on God. All right? But, but if you view things as, well, I just want a good outcome for the most people, what does that even mean? What is good in that case?

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well, I mean, I think the, the, the morality thing that you’re talking about here is, is interesting because by the definitions of society right now, you and us are weird because we don’t follow the, the normative cultural ethical set, which seems to be highly [00:11:00] deleterious to people living, like, fulfilling lives.

Nux Taku: I, I agree with you. I, I think that if you ask your average, like, liberal, enlightened liberal what, what morality is, it’s just basically if there’s consenting adults, it’s fine. That- that’s their only tenet- Yeah ... basically, because they don’t want bad things to happen to themselves. It’s selfish inherently.

They wanna be able to live whatever debaucherous lifestyle they could come up with, and they don’t want anyone to step on them. So therefore, their belief system based on this preference is, “Oh, if everyone consents, it’s fine.”

Malcolm Collins: Well, I think it, it... W- I, I really like that you’re drawing attention to this because you can see from this view of consent being the core of morality, where we keep seeing leftists get in hot water ideologically.

W- one of the episodes we have, we go over communist regimes and how many of them tried to lower the age of consent to, like, super low ages, like 11 or 12 or something like that. And- Yeah ... some socialist parties did. And, and the reason is, is because in reality, the reason we don’t sleep with children isn’t about consent.

Like, we [00:12:00] allow mentally disabled people to have sex. We allow elderly people to have sex. If you’re talking about a 15-year-old or something like that, they have a mental i- intelligence that’s higher than a, a nine-year-old. N- nobody has a problem when a nine-year-old has sex. It’s not about consent. It’s about what it does to that person and the effects it has on their life, right?

And I think that w- we see the famous Ch- Chuck clip where he’s like, “I don’t see anything wrong with having sex with an animal if you were like the one in...” Do you... Are you... Have you seen this clip? Sure.

Nux Taku: Go ahead. Yeah, I love that clip. You re- you mean to tell me that the inbred Islamist thinks that you can have sex with animals?

Weird. Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Funny

Nux Taku: coincidence.

Malcolm Collins: No, you don’t have sex with animals ‘cause of the negative effects that has on your life, and, like, the diseases and all of the other negative effects. See,

Nux Taku: but you know what? Y- you, you bring us to a fantastic point because if you forget God for a second. Mm-hmm. Try to explain to me under a liberal worldview why you should not have sex with an animal

Malcolm Collins: You, there, there isn’t a good explanation.

That’s what these people are realizing. They just know-

Nux Taku: Because [00:13:00] they, because they can’t consent? Is that it? No, obviously not- That’s, no ... ‘cause you can eat meat. You could literally kill it- Yeah ... and eat it.

Simone Collins: Yeah, but

Nux Taku: then- So consent

Simone Collins: is not the issue Most of them don’t eat meat. Like true-

Malcolm Collins: No, they eat- ... true vegans don’t

Nux Taku: eat

chunks,

Malcolm Collins: freaking veals, Simone Chunk does. Chunk eats meat They torture babies cows. This is business. And even if they’re m-

Nux Taku: not

Malcolm Collins: m-

Nux Taku: And even, even if they didn’t eat meat ... if they’re eating dairy ... it, it’s irrelevant. If it’s all consent based, then what’s wrong with having sex with a corpse? It’s dead. It can’t consent.

What’s the difference?

Malcolm Collins: That’s a good point. And- That is a

Nux Taku: good

Malcolm Collins: point. I, it- There is

Nux Taku: no reason- It’s, it’s not ...

Malcolm Collins: as a progressive.

Nux Taku: Isn’t it illegal to have

Simone Collins: sex with corpses? But from a

Nux Taku: progressive mindset, they’re... I don’t think so. But why? Why not? Like, they, th- there’s no consent required. Okay, why is incest immoral according to the leftist worldview?

Why is it immoral to have s- y- you consent and your sibling consents. Really true.

Malcolm Collins: That makes sense. I hadn’t thought about all of the things this breaks, but it breaks a

Simone Collins: lot. Yeah, but, but it is, I think it’s immoral-

Nux Taku: It does ...

Simone Collins: because it- Because- ... it’s, it’s rural coded, and rural coded is conservative coded, and if it’s conservative it’s bad.

So incest- Okay, well- ... has to be bad.

Nux Taku: Okay, to be fair, incest happens [00:14:00] mostly in like Muslim countries, which is left wing at this point. So like, I don’t know.

Simone Collins: Right. But no, no, no. Like, in, in the leftist mind no one thinks about the life of someone in a Muslim or Islamic country. They only think in terms of the United States, and then if someone is Muslim or other, they’re just good.

They’re just good. Oh. Trust me. I

Nux Taku: forgot

Simone Collins: about that. Yeah. So like, like I don’t know who they are. They’re better than I am. Their culture is enlightened. Mine is bad. And my extra bad people are the hicks in the countryside who screw their cousins, so you know.

Nux Taku: But, but the point I’m making though is from their logical standpoint that as long as everyone consents it’s fine.

There is nothing wrong with this.

Malcolm Collins: Absolutely.

Nux Taku: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well,

Nux Taku: that- And, and that’s, and, and that’s the degradation of every value and... Look, I think that it’s bad to have sex with your sibling ‘cause it says in the Bible not to have sex with your sibling. God said it actually.

Malcolm Collins: The It’s actually

Nux Taku: pretty simple

Malcolm Collins: the it, one thing I found pretty interesting that Simone said there is how leftists are not allowed to look at the reality of what it’s like in many of these countries, and I think we see an embodiment of that was Greta Thunberg [00:15:00] when she wouldn’t watch the voto- the, the video that like literally Hamas film- October 7th

Nux Taku: video.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Just like I don’t want to see reality because that interferes with the fantasy that I’m living in That was one

Nux Taku: I completely agree. If, I think, okay, so I mean, there’s a, a Bible verse, right? Torah Emet in Hebrew, right? That, Right ... the Torah is truth and or the Bible, the Torah is the Old Testament.

So essentially my, my perspective is if you are gonna continue going on your like anti-God path, you are going to consistently have an issue with truth. Reality is a major issue if you’re a leftist. You know, men could be women- Yeah ... and words don’t actually mean anything. And and Islamic countries are really actually based and good to gay people.

And you know, hon- and you don’t even need to live in reality at this point. Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah.

Nux Taku: Because reality is bigoted.

Malcolm Collins: So when did you first feel comfortable? Like explain, was there a moment when you first felt comfortable saying this stuff or like [00:16:00] voicing this and

Nux Taku: what

Malcolm Collins: changed?

Nux Taku: So I, I, I feel like I’ve always tried to be honest.

I’ve just decided on things that I’d rather not get into because, you know, why... Like if I’m making anime videos, I’m not gonna start talking about abortion, you know? Like why divide my, my audience in half by, you know, talking about something that’s completely irrelevant to whatever content I’m making is.

But as time went on and I started talking about like internet drama and Hasan Piker, you know, advocates for me to get killed by Hamas terrorists ‘cause he says I’m, I’m an Israeli Nazi even though not. But anyway, so a- as time went on, now that I’m talking about politics and things, I’m, I feel a lot more comfortable saying the things.

I’ve been backstabbed by enough people that I don’t, I don’t really care if you disagree with me. That’s your American God-given right, you know? So

Malcolm Collins: yeah. So if you were gonna like, how much of it was the people attacking you for saying things that you thought was reasonable that radicalized you to want to say more of that stuff?

Nux Taku: To be honest, it’s not that they attack me that makes me wanna say it, it’s that it’s considered [00:17:00] inappropriate to say. Like it is super inappropriate in public in American like- Yeah ... probably not in like houses and closed doors ‘cause everyone would pro- like a lot of people would agree with this, but if I say that gay sex is degenerate, that is considered like a, a super taboo in American online culture.

That is very true,

Malcolm Collins: yeah.

Nux Taku: Right? Because it’s two consenting adults, so what’s the problem, right? That’s the, that’s the through line. But but so I don’t really care if people come after me for my opinions. It’s, it’s- So, so for you- ... just that it’s not acceptable to say

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Oh, that is, that is really fascinating.

I mean, it’s, it’s very different from us. We sort of got radicalized by the left or, or radicalized by your channel. But like, ... it was like us originally going viral over just being like, “Hey, birth rates are low.” And then people freaked out about that, and they’re like, “Well, then you must be a racist.”

Nux Taku: Yeah. Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: And then-

Nux Taku: Because you can’t live in reality ...

Malcolm Collins: the thing that changed me the most was, like, the first time I started hanging out in [00:18:00] right-wing spaces or going to right-wing conferences, and I went and I was, you know, we’re... You know, you’re, you’re, you’re not... I, I don’t think you’ve done, like, a big face reveal or anything, so, so you don’t get noticed at conferences and stuff like that.

But like, going to conferences, having beliefs that I know are really outside of a lot of mainstream conservative norms, and I was afraid that I would be sort of grilled on them or made to feel like I wasn’t welcome or made to feel like an outsider, and instead I have felt the exact opposite, where when we were in leftist spaces, and we even did, like, leftist campaigning, politics, everything like that, it was a constant litmus test.

And I don’t think people on the right realize how much our side benefits from being nice to people who did things in the past that they regret now or are, w- in the process of changing and still being accepting of them

Nux Taku: So do you know my opinion on why that happens among right-wing people but not left-wing people?

Malcolm Collins: I, yeah give me your opinion. That’s

Nux Taku: [00:19:00] Because I think repentance is inherently a biblical trait. And forgiveness and repentance only exists if you could believe in God. Hmm. And if you are on the other side where it’s all about, you know, we’re all just a whole, a clump of atoms that are whizzing through a point, a purposeless space, then why ever repent?

Why ever do better? Why would I assume that you regret your mistakes and become a better person? I wouldn’t. It’s so much easier- Yeah ... to just throw you in the box. Whereas on the other side which, and more right-wing politics, obviously it’s not, not nearly conservative enough. Not, man, I wish Trump was the guy that the left thought he was, you know?

But- Yeah, right ... yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Actually, this is an interesting point in terms of making the lived sort of right-wing parties more conservative. One of the things that I think a lot of people a little, in our wider faction are annoyed with is in UK, you know, how progressive even parties like Reform or the AD- or A- A FDR in Germany or you know, MAGA in the United States and how do [00:20:00] you realistically shift the Overton window of what’s normal?

Like, what’s, what’s your thesis?

Nux Taku: That... So I, so ultimately every- all change takes time. Like, every time I see, like, the the accelerationists being like, “Oh, we have to vote for leftists so they can rape our country, and then- ... and then we’ll swing the other way,” it’s like, no, no, no. No, no. Trump is the swing, okay?

He is the swing the other way, and Trump is kind of a ‘90s liberal, you know?

Malcolm Collins: Like- He’s a very ‘90s liberal. He holds the- Yeah, we were

Simone Collins: just talking about this yesterday. He 100%

Malcolm Collins: is. It’s not just that he’s a ‘90s li- liberal, it’s that every one of his, like, top lieutenants was an anti-Trump leftist the first time he ran for office, whether it’s- Yeah

J.D. Vance or Elon or RFK- These-

Nux Taku: Yeah ...

Malcolm Collins: th- were all anti l- anti-Trump leftists, and now

Nux Taku: they’re all- And they, and they were all, they were all Democrats, and so d- you know, Joe Rogan was a Democrat, he endorsed him, you know. So I agree with you, and I think it’s mostly ‘cause the left completely went insane that you know, what, what was considered a [00:21:00] left of center person from the ‘90s is considered, like, the far right fascist today.

But I, I- Yeah ... think this stuff takes time, you know? I think that the, especially our generation is a lot more right wing than, you know, the boomers that are in Congress. So I think it takes time, you know? You keep electing more and more radical people as time goes on. You see someone betrays the, the tenets and, you know, you just get, get rid of them.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Get them out. Well, I mean, we, we are seeing this at rallies. I mean, obviously the famous saying, and I think you’ve covered this, is you go to the Biden rallies, the Su- No Kings rallies, and it’s a bunch of old people. Yeah ... and I, I hear this from our Israeli fans as well. They’re like, “All of the liberal parties in Israel are just like their parades are all super old people.”

Yeah ... a- and-

Nux Taku: Mostly women ...

Malcolm Collins: what, outbreeding them works. And in the- True ... United States we actually have a fairly decent fertility rate. This is, this is actually one of my biggest consternations about Nux, is you said that you were gonna stop streaming when you have a kid. And I was like, “I really want you to have a kid, but I don’t want you to stop streaming.”

Nux Taku: Well, when I said stop streaming, I [00:22:00] meant, like, live streaming. I would still be making videos probably. Oh,

Malcolm Collins: okay, okay ...

Nux Taku: it’s just, you know, when you’re live y- you wanna play with your kid, you know? You wanna, you wanna be there. So if you’re live streaming, you’re gonna be there for f- four hours in a row streaming.

You don’t wanna stop, you know. I’m not gonna pause, say, “Oh, sorry, gotta go play with my kid.” I’ll... So yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah.

It’s, it’s awesome,

Nux Taku: man ... so whatever.

Malcolm Collins: But anyway, I, we gotta, What would be the, a, a, a, a good place? Well, another thing I wanted to ask you about is your thoughts on the sort of online right being as ideologically diverse as it is. Mm. Like when you, you look at somebody like Asam Gold and his beliefs on abortion, or Shoe0nHead and her beliefs in communism or socialism and stuff like this, w- why do you think that we are this intellectually diverse?

Nux Taku: Again because I think to some extent repentance exists. You know, obviously I think that Asmongold’s takes on abortion are terrible. I think She Want Head’s takes on communism are terrible. You know, Asmongold because of thou shall not murder and you know, She Want Head ‘cause of thou shalt not steal.

But, Yeah ... [00:23:00] that said, I have faith. I have faith they’ll see the light because on the right you’re a truth seeker. You know? And that’s why- Yeah ... you have all the crazy conspiracy theories, ‘cause ultimately these people wanna figure out the truth.

Malcolm Collins: That’s

Nux Taku: a, I never thought about that ... they might get lost along the way, but on the left the truth doesn’t matter.

Men can be women on the left. N-

Malcolm Collins: The point that you made there that I’ve never thought about before is I’ve often joked to people when I first started going to, like, conservative conventions, the thing that shocked me the most is, like, everyone would just stop me and hand me, like, a printout of their private conspiracy theory.

It was like a conspiracy theory- ... like share lot. And I was like, “W- why are conspiracy theories so big?” And a lot of them turned out to be true, mind you. A lot. Like, a stupid amount that- They can be ... Caleb Tate was being funded by the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Nux Taku: I could not... That was crazy.

Malcolm Collins: That just-

Nux Taku: Oh, my G- Worth, worth electing Trump just for that.

Malcolm Collins: That just- Really ... like happened and went and we don’t talk about it anymore.

Nux Taku: Yeah. Oh, my God. It’s insane. Insane.

Malcolm Collins: That, but- Like,

Nux Taku: there was so little racism that they had to pay for it. Unreal.

Malcolm Collins: They I, well, and I think [00:24:00] that it’s important, I mean, this is something we always fight for in our video, that like, yes, like racial groups, there may be reasons to have animosity or ethnic pride or pride in your culture, but if we make the right a space where other people don’t feel comfortable, then we’re not gonna win elections.

And I think it’s really important to- Also true ... counter those sorts of narratives. But fortunately we’ve done a good job. I mean, we pushed Nick Fuentes out of the party, right? Like, he’s a Democrat now. So that’s... No, he said, “I’m a moderate Democrat.” Yeah. Do you see that?

Nux Taku: Yeah, I saw that. And then he said that if the left ever wins I have to flee the country ‘cause they’re gonna kill me.

So, you know, whatever. I, I-

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. All liberals ... a lot, a lot of

Nux Taku: what he says is hyperbole anyway, so you know.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Actually, how do you think about this? Because one of the things that I see the most in your channel, that I also see in his channel, is really sort of high, positive, happy energy. Is this something you do intentionally?

Is it just the way you are 24/7?

Nux Taku: I, I am generally a positive guy. I have faith, okay? I have faith [00:25:00] it’ll... It, it’s all part of the plan. You know, even, even the bad news is, like, secretly part of the good news. We just didn’t figure that out yet. So, no, I, I have a lot of faith that things are actually looking up.

I am generally an optimistic guy, and again, it says in the Bible to be happy. It’s like-

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, the thing that I’m most surprised about on this stream that I was not aware of, of you is one, just how much you’ve always held these beliefs, and two, that these beliefs are all downstream. I don’t want to say like a, a, a, a, a wind-up Jew, but like they are what...

If you just followed all of the stuff that it said, all the stuff the religion said, it’s where you would come ideologically.

Nux Taku: I, I am a Pentateuch extremist. You had such a cool name for your ideology, I had to come up with one.

Malcolm Collins: But, Yeah. Make one up and con- convert people. Give it... I mean, our ideology is very heretical to the right, so you know, we’ll see.

But we got, we got followers now, too, so that’s, that’s cool.

Nux Taku: Yeah ...

Malcolm Collins: I mean, I belie- Look, I... If you go back, Jewish teachings, they often talk about heaven as a place in the future. They talk about, like, the sons of [00:26:00] man. Why would you need to talk about the sons of man? That’s a weird word, unless we were destined to colonize space one day and have different genetic variants of humanity.

Anyhow, I get too... but-

Nux Taku: I love this stuff. I could nerd out on this for sure. Yeah. Yeah. I, I have theories. I, I do too. I’m with you. If you think-

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Oh, what, what’s your craziest theory? I w- c- let’s go craziest Bible theory.

Nux Taku: Craziest theory? I don’t think I have a craziest theory. What’s

Simone Collins: like any theory?

Any theory.

Malcolm Collins: Oh,

Nux Taku: a like Bible theory? The, dude, I, I’ll come up with one, I’ll tell you

Malcolm Collins: I’ll give you my Adam and Eve crazy

Nux Taku: theory.

Malcolm Collins: Sorry? I’ll give you, I’ll give you my Adam and Eve crazy theory, okay? All right,

Nux Taku: go for it. So,

Malcolm Collins: In Adam-

Nux Taku: All right, and then I’ll, I’ll give you one. I thought of one. I thought of one of mine.

Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Go for it. In Adam and Eve when I first started becoming, like, religious again and rereading these stories, I wanted to go to the ones that seemed on the face I didn’t understand it. I didn’t understand why God would punish man for wanting knowledge of good and evil. That didn’t sit right with me.

So then I went to the story, and I looked at what actually happened in the story, and we know that the first thing that man did when he got the knowledge of good and evil [00:27:00] was to clothe himself, yet I don’t think anyone thinks it’s sinful to be naked in front of God and your wife. So, and we know that God allowed him to be naked in the garden as well, so it, it said that he had the type of knowledge of good and evil that God had.

So clearly that’s not exactly what it meant. And then I thought about, oh, what is the idea of, like, shame around nudity around your wife and God? That’s man making up his own rules about what’s good and evil in opposition to God. And then I noticed that actually up until that point, man only had one rule, which was don’t eat from that one tree, and it said that he like, the, the, the, he, basically the curse sort of applied to him the moment he reached for the tree.

That’s when he gained the knowledge, not when he ate from it, because that was the moment he decided to disobey God and decided that man knows more about what good and evil is than God does. That’s my-

Nux Taku: That’s a good theory. I like it. That’s cool. No, that’s really cool. That’s a good- so, I mean, kind of on a tangent on, on yours though, before I, before I tell you my really kooky one.

Good [00:28:00] and evil is free will.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah.

Nux Taku: Because if, if there would be no such thing as evil then, you know, we wouldn’t have some sort of- Oh, that’s a good way to put it ... evil inclination telling, telling us to do bad things all the time. We would just do the good things all the time. We wouldn’t even have the will to do bad things.

So evil, the existence of evil is the existence of free will. Hmm. And the reason why we exist at all in this world, like if you think about it, why, why did God need to create us at all? Like, what, what’s cool about us to exist? I’ll tie it into my cool, my other theory. If God- Tie it

Malcolm Collins: in. I’m interested to hear

Nux Taku: if God is everything, right? ‘Cause Go- God is, he fills all things, he surrounds all things, you know, he is everything, right? So that means technically we are all part of God as well. He’s everything. Now, he, he hides himself from us so that we have free will, but we’re also s- we’re still part of God to some extent.

So y- you ever hear like the the, like the God paradoxes? Like, okay, so if God could do anything, could God repent? Could God get better at things? And it’s like, no God’s perfect. I,

Malcolm Collins: I’ve heard these- But wouldn’t repenting- ... but I don’t [00:29:00] find them very compelling.

Nux Taku: Well, I, I, I have a way to... All right. So I’ll, I’ll finish my, my thing.

Malcolm Collins: Okay.

Nux Taku: If we are part of God, then us repenting is the part of God that could repent. So we are part of the perfection of God due to us being imperfect.

Malcolm Collins: Oh, that’s really clever.

Simone Collins: Hmm.

Malcolm Collins: That’s really clever. That’s really clever. You should be proud of that one. I also have never heard that one in my life.

Simone Collins: Never, yeah.

Nor have I.

Malcolm Collins: That’s a good... Damn. Y-

Nux Taku: That, that, that one’s like a bit- That’s a good- It’s a bit of a mind f**k. Like if... Th- the issue with this one is like I feel like it sounds almost heretical. What, would you perfect God? It’s like, no, no, I don’t perfect God. God’s perfect. And all of his creations are exactly what he wanted them to be.

So all of his- Yeah ... creations are pa- part of God’s perfectness. And so our imperfection is part of God’s perfectness

Malcolm Collins: Wow. Okay, so here’s a, here’s a side question, right? You, in the early days, were into [00:30:00] stuff like anime and the, you know... I mean, you’re still into it. You watch Adventure Time. Adventure Time’s great, by the way.

Have you not actually watched all of Adventure Time?

Nux Taku: Yeah, it’s great. No, I haven’t. I haven’t.

Malcolm Collins: You gotta-

Nux Taku: I’m working on it. I’m working on it.

Malcolm Collins: When you have kids, you should watch that with your kids. I

Nux Taku: will.

Simone Collins: Our kids really like Adventure Time, but they also, I think they have, like, or ‘90s and ‘80s cartoons more, if we’re being honest here, so.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, we basically- Yeah ... only play ‘90 and ‘80s cartoons for our kids, like G.I. Joes and stuff. Makes sense. So they get the- Everything else is,

Nux Taku: like, gay.

Malcolm Collins: Truly though. They, they literally, like we’ll show them a globe and we’re like, “This is China,” and they’re like, “Okay, well maybe one day we should, we should take China and make them fight for us,” he said.

Nux Taku: Yes. Dude, kids are awesome.

Malcolm Collins: They really are. Awesome. Okay. Like,

Nux Taku: you ask a kid, “Should you win wars?” And your kids will be like, “Duh, of course you should win wars.” And then you ask, like, some UN politician, “Should you win wars?” “No.” Winning wars- For real ... is terrible. For

Simone Collins: real. Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: But, like, what drew you into the sort of antimate- anime and performatively subversive [00:31:00] world?

Nux Taku: Originally YouTube was a hobby. Like, you know, I liked anime and I, I needed an outlet. And and I started making videos on it, and I liked it. And then I started making fun of retards, like, in the anime world. And that evolved into, like, actually we could broaden our horizons. There’s a lot of retards.

, And, and here we are. But, but originally it was just a hobby. Like, I never expected to make money off this or anything.

Malcolm Collins: So it’s just like... Yeah, we have a, a larger theory on this. I don’t know if you’ve ever heard our theory on, like, what happened here, but if you go back to the ‘90s in the United States the conservative faction had two key cultural groups.

There was the the, the... What were the, what were the Southern people again called, Simone?

Simone Collins: Cavaliers.

Malcolm Collins: The Cavaliers which was a, a Deep South sort of aristocratic culture. And then you had the greater Appalachia region, which was the backwoods people, which had sort of an anti-aristocratic culture.

And when we look at, like, what this represented in the ‘90s, this is what we call truck nut conservatives or something like that, right? Like, the guy who’s obviously a conservative but puts, like, sexy women on mud flaps on his trucker, right? You know. He had this sort of performative subversion to him.

And what we’ve seen, we [00:32:00] can even see this in voting patterns, is that the right has moved more to this truck nut conservative type. And the reason is, is that the left- I have a theory ... the, the, yeah, the urban monoculture as we call it, ended up figuring out it could control people by saying, you know, “This is degenerate,” or bad or harmful to society.

And then as soon as you said, “Well, I’m not gonna do the things that are, you know, bad,” right, they can just grab that and constantly expand that category. So the only way that we as a movement were able to subvert that and even signal to other people within the movement, “No, I’m chill, bro,” is through su- subversion of, of cultural norms that are not inherently actually bad.

A, a good examp- You could... You were gonna say something?

Nux Taku: I, yeah, I, I think that, I, I thought what you were gonna get to is, like, it’s so weird how, like, you have all these, like, you know, trucker guys and, you know, they like sexy women and stuff, and it’s like they’re conservatives. Like, you’d think that they would [00:33:00] be, like, prudish.

I thought that’s what you were getting to.

Malcolm Collins: Well, no, there’s always been a part of American culture that was conservative in an anti-a- authority sort of way, at a, an anti-aristocratic sort of way, a way where-

Nux Taku: I think masculinity is inherently right wing.

Malcolm Collins: W- I agree. R- r- I agree with that. But I think that there there, there was sort of this fear of anyone, because the left uses this so powerfully, of anyone being able to call rank on us, you know?

I have the X degree. I have the X qualifications. I decide what’s right. I have

Nux Taku: X chromosomes.

Malcolm Collins: Right, yeah. And to fight that, we had to be subversive so that people would understand that we weren’t... Like, you don’t, Asmongold does anywhere in any of his videos, anywhere in your videos, do you signal that you think you’re better than other people.

And-

Nux Taku: I don’t think I’m better than other people. Yeah ... I think that everyone was created in the image of God. But I think some cultures suck s**t and we don’t need to import them here.

Malcolm Collins: That is true.

Nux Taku: And it’s not, you know, that, that is not, like, a [00:34:00] contradiction.

Malcolm Collins: But this is- Yeah ... super common on the left.

Like, Hasan’s outfits, if you look at the cost of, like, his basic outfit, his dog being the most expensive dog breed in the world. Right. Right?

Nux Taku: W- which he electrocutes, by the way. Don’t

Malcolm Collins: forget. Which he electrocutes, yeah. And it’s caused really interesting phenomenon that have given us a cultural edge in the current landscape.

One really big one is the left somehow became the anti-AI party and the right’s, like, a super pro-AI party. And we’re the ones that g- have our sky brows and our, all of these AI music videos- Yeah, yeah ... and stuff.

Nux Taku: Again, I, I think, I think, I feel like so many of these things are, like, the same issue just repackaged.

It’s because the right realizes that reality is real. AI is not leaving, okay? So yeah, artists are gonna lose their jobs, and that sucks for them, but that’s called progress, and I’m sorry that happened, but life moves on. You know, a lot of seamstresses lost their jobs when sewing machines were invented.

Yeah. Does that mean we should not have sewing machines? And the left, [00:35:00] because the left has decided that you know, they, they basically, you know, have become the party of the, you know, anti-reality retards. All right? They, they hate AI because they would like to still make believe that AI is not happening, and that’s not real life.

True.

Malcolm Collins: No, and, and that’s, I mean, that’s a strong argument for AI. There’s just nothing we can do about it. And if we do do something about it, then we become like Europe and we drop off the, the global economy- Yeah ... and China ends up crushing us.

Nux Taku: Yeah, absolutely. AI’s here. It’s here to stay. It’s not going anywhere.

People are gonna use it. Make the most of it. Yeah. Don’t be a victim.

Malcolm Collins: Well, I, I think that there’s also sort of the, this sort of also performative, performative subversion that we see in AI, like Skybrow’s Cream of the Slop, this idea of like, yeah, okay, it’s AI slop. Whatever. It’s still fun. And-

Nux Taku: There’s a self-awareness there

Malcolm Collins: yeah. Well, I mean, it’s become the part... It reminds me of the scene in Madagascar, a children’s cartoon. I don’t know if you’ve seen it where they- I’ve seen it ... th- th- you’ve seen it? Mm. Yeah. Where they, they divide a, a, an island into the fun side and the not fun side. And in the [00:36:00] not fun side- ... he’s just sad about being trapped there, and his sign collapses to say, “Hell.”

And in the fun side, they’re all having fun, right? Like they’re, they’ve made a little tiki hut. They’re drinking their fake drinks, spitting them out afterwards, of course, ‘cause it’s all seawater. You know, none- everything isn’t actually perfect, but they get to have fun and pretend like it. And coming to the right, for me, felt like coming to the fun side.

Like, y- yeah, you know?

Nux Taku: Yeah. You know, you don’t have to t- not everything is super serious. I mean, like, on the left they think mental illnesses are superpowers, you know? So th- they’ll sit there and collect mental illnesses like they’re Pokemon and and you’re gonna be surprised that these are, like, the most miserable people on the planet?

Malcolm Collins: A- a- admittedly, Candace Owens probably does too, right? You know. But we- You

Nux Taku: assume she’s right-wing ...

Malcolm Collins: Fair. Very, very fair. Yeah, she has a lot of leftist positions. Yeah. But I would s- I, it

Nux Taku: w- She, she used to run a website called Social Autopsy. Did you hear about this? Y- you

Malcolm Collins: know, that- [00:37:00] Yeah ... she, she, was it, like, anti-bullying?

Go, go into, go into the lore.

Nux Taku: Yeah. So, so anti, Social Autopsy was, like, this website to basically dox right-wing people. Like, you know, of course, this is the classic leftist tactic. It’s like, oh, right-wing people that believe in literally anything, oh, they must be bullies, so we have to destroy them and ruin their lives.

And she was a leftist, like one of these crazy radical leftists that would actually dox people until she realized that the grift was better to be, like, the, the Black woman against BLM, you know? And and that was her new grift, et cetera. Y-

Malcolm Collins: you know she thinks Charlie Kirk was a time traveler

Nux Taku: Well, she does think that Israel and E- Egypt are working together with Sumerian time travel technology to kill Charlie Kirk ‘cause he was an X-Man.

Simone Collins: Someone’s got to.

Nux Taku: Yeah. Yeah, I guess.

Malcolm Collins: We have an episode on this, Psychosis Maxxing, if you guys wanna watch it. It’s f*****g crazy-

Simone Collins: Oh, that should be so great ... her world perspective. But no, truly, like her unholstered schizophrenia has actually been very profitable. I mean, unfortunately she is a case in which some form of, I don’t know what it is, but it’s working for her, like really [00:38:00] well.

God. Whenever we criticize her- Yeah ... like people are coming into our comments being like, “Well, but I love it.”

Nux Taku: I

Simone Collins: get those too ... “She’s got some great points.”

Nux Taku: And, and then I, then I had to make like a whole like hour and a half long video just piecing apart all of her... She says that the Jews invented dinosaurs to trick Christians into thinking God isn’t real.

Malcolm Collins: That-

Nux Taku: There are so many layers to that one sentence- Jews invented dinosaurs ... it’s

Malcolm Collins: unreal ... it’s unbelievable. Like what? All that-

Simone Collins: That is a yes and. The only response to that is yes, and. Come on. To give

Malcolm Collins: her credit, she doesn’t just rehash old conspiracy theories. Her world is almost like Tolkien’s world, where like she invented a totally new world of conspiracy theories.

Yeah.

Nux Taku: Okay. You are giving her way too much credit. She takes every old conspiracy in the book and then just blames the Jews for it. Okay? Actually, it’s the oldest style conspiracy theory.

Malcolm Collins: That is an

Simone Collins: interesting twist. It adds color. It’s more fun with Jews, though. I mean, let’s, it’s, it

Nux Taku: just- Yeah, Jews, they’re great.

Simone Collins: It’s like adding salt to a dish. Jews. Like you need it. It’s, it’s the MSG of, of lore, you know? It’s just-

Nux Taku: Sure, sure.

Malcolm Collins: I mean, but [00:39:00] realistically- Great ... this, I mean, this is where we are on our channel on this, and everyone’s always like, ‘cause we get some people on our channel who are like anti-Jew or whatever.

I’m like, bro, the only people who matter in the future are the people who have lots of kids and still have technology. Some groups have a lot of kids and they do it by give, give, not having technology or not being economically productive. There’s only two groups on earth that have that right now, and one of them is the Jews, and they’re even beating us at fertility rates, right?

So, we’ve gotta take that seriously, right? Like the, the, being partnered with them is a lot better than being on their bad side, or that becomes the new human war, US versus Israel. But-

Nux Taku: I mean, I, I feel like there is a reason why there are so many foreign governments that are doing everything in their power to kind of be like, “Oh my God, do you, do you believe Israel is, you know, killing terrorists that are trying to kill them?”

It’s like, what? You know? And you know, doing everything. Like you have Russia promoting Candace Owens and, and Tucker Carlson, and you, k- Tucker Carlson’s buying a house in Qatar. I love America so much. I’m buying a house in Qatar . [00:40:00] You know? It’s like, all right, dude. Crazy. Yeah, sure. Right? Well, I gotta- And so many of these

Malcolm Collins: I think a part of it is and we have an episode where we go over this, is that the internet has shifted of who the primary viewer is over the past 10 years, and now your average internet viewer is a third worlder.

And a lot of these people don’t realize, like, they’re... W- why, why, like why all the, the weird Indian hate in, in the United States? Like, yes, there’s problems with them and jobs and everything like that, but they’re not as big a problem as the people, like, murdering us on the streets and stuff like that, right?

And it’s like, well, because this matters to third worlders. Jews matter to third worlders. Like all these, you know, M- Middle Eastern countries, the, the Jews is what they think about every day. And so I think some online influencers don’t realize that they have really just captured a third world audience.

Nux Taku: Don’t realize or don’t care?

Malcolm Collins: Don’t care. You’re right. I mean- I mean,

Nux Taku: you have someone with the million views. Yeah, it’s from packing-

Malcolm Collins: Sneako, right? Hey. Sneako just, just speed running that.

Nux Taku: Bro, Sneako, he’s like, actually [00:41:00] retarded. It’s amazing.

Malcolm Collins: He’s like, “I wa- I wanna be s-” Oh my God ... specifically make all of my content maximally appealing to third worlders.

Nux Taku: He, he’s amazing. He’s amazing. I- Sneako’s incredible. It’s a, it’s train wreck in slow motion. You know, bro goes out there to piss off the Christians and he’s like, “Oh, Jesus wasn’t white. Oh, Jesus was a Jew from Palestine.” Yeah, I’m sure he was. I’m sure he was. Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: You’re, you’re,

Nux Taku: So you mean to tell me that the Jews are indigenous to Palestine, Sneako?

Malcolm Collins: “No, no, what do you mean?” That, that’s wild. Yeah, no, I... Your, your video on him, this, this was one of the fun things for me recently is, i- you were looking at his numbers and you’re like, “Look at how terrible these numbers are,” and I was like We’re, we’re not that much bigger. But I’m like, “But I guess he’s in decline.”

And then when I heard that he- Okay,

Nux Taku: hold up, hold up. Th- that’s not fair. First of all, you cannot compare. Sneako has millions of subscribers, he’s well-known, people talk about him, he’s like public, he- p- in the public discourse, he was on every big show. You know- True ... he was col- he collabed with every big guy on the planet.

Adin Ross, and Andrew [00:42:00] Tate, and Nick Fuentes, and he was on Piers Morgan, and he hung out with- True ... Kanye West. He was with all the big guys, and no one wants to watch his slop.

Malcolm Collins: That is true. Which is stupid as f**k ... but the thing that gave me heart recently was learning that you didn’t get to 100,000 views until your fourth year of doing this, and we’re only at year three now.

That’s true. So we’re, we’re- Yeah ... on track to hit your numbers if we just never stop.

Nux Taku: Yeah ...

Malcolm Collins: which is okay.

Nux Taku: Look numbers are ... l- it was definitely a big trade-off when I decided, you know what, I’m gonna be I’m just gonna say all the things that I like instead of just become, be generic normie slop.

Like, at some point I was just like, “I’ll just do all the YouTube drama. I won’t, like, have any edgy opinions.” And I was like, “Why? F**k that s**t, dude.” I want, I want the world to be better for my kids, you know?

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. No, I mean, the, it, it’s fas- when we first came, even with our reboot in this channel our entire, like, theme with the channel and goal with the channel was just, like, basically, like, effective altruist philosophy, right?

Like, r- r- r- really basic leftist high-minded philosophy, because back then I still had this desire to be [00:43:00] seen as, like, this intellectual, and I think shedding that desire and realizing that I wanted to be seen for who I was and, and, and as a culture warrior it was something that I was only able to do.

And again, I really want to just emphasize this to people on the right, because when we started to make those transitions, people on the right supported us and they were nice to us even though we had only just begun to transition. And well, I mean, look at you coming on our show, for example, and you’re so much bigger than us.

You have no reason to do this other than just being completely magnanimous, right? It, it, it-

Nux Taku: It’s

Malcolm Collins: really

Nux Taku: nice of you ...

Malcolm Collins: it only- No, it’s

Nux Taku: purely selfish. I just think you guys are cool and, Oh ... I wanted to do this.

Malcolm Collins: But I want to... Actually, what I wanna talk about before we close this out, because this is something I talked a, a little bit about, and we can see if we can get fans involved if they’re interested in this.

But I’ve been thinking about setting up some form of formal sort of political organization for the- wider sort of cultural movement that we represent. Because, you know, when I go to my friends at like the Heritage Foundation or whatever, and [00:44:00] I’m talking to them about like, “You know, like I, I don’t think like censoring furries is gonna play well among a lot of right-wing people.”

And they’re like, “What are you talking about?” I’m like, “Well, you know all the fox girl VTubers.” And they’re like, “What are you talking about?” And I’m like like maybe we need like- ... some, some form of i- even, even an outreach group.” So I was thinking like, what if we try to set something up and get some buy-in from the various big name voices in the movement so that they can guide.

Because I don’t want something where like I’m guiding policy. Something like a, a Turning Point USA, but that’s focused on this sort of nerd right faction. What are your thoughts on putting something like that together and even the utility of something like that?

Nux Taku: It sounds really cool. I, I, I wonder what the major purpose is, and I, and I’ll explain what I mean.

Turning Point USA is successful and incredible because frankly it’s an alternative to the college slop.

Malcolm Collins: Mm-hmm.

Nux Taku: Right? You know, you go into- Mm ... the college system, and you’re literally, th- they put the, the, [00:45:00] you know, the, the hypnosis screen in front of you and they, they just replay images of whatever the f**k they want to in- you know, install in your mind.

So I think Turning Point USA is an alternative. It’s like, “Hey, you could follow that path and be an incredibly unhappy cat woman with debt at the age of 60. Or you could follow our path, and you could like have a family and be successful.” And it’s like, wait a second. That makes- Hold up. You know?

Actually, I, I- So Turning Point USA is really effective there. When it comes to I, I guess our movement or the, the new right, the online right, I, I don’t know if it needs a grass gr- grassroots idea.

Malcolm Collins: That’s actually a really good point. I, I think you just need to- Those things are... Now that I think about it, you’re right.

They’re sort of over and useless now. We, we actually were going over how if you look at Ben Shapiro, he appears to just be buying everything now or buying ads on things. Yep. And treating... His organization is just like a fundraising organization that pretends to be able to influence policy. And this reminds me, one of the anecdotes I say is when the new administration was being [00:46:00] staffed, this version of the Trump administration, the network they were tapping was the Founders Fund network and not like the Heritage Foundation and stuff like that.

Like, we had to make the intros for the Heritage Foundation people. And what I realized is I think even like the ins- the, the true MAGA, like who are staffing things, they’re like, “We’re not staffing. We’re not allowing these people to influence our policy anymore. We’re just taking like based Doge kids.”

By the way, you know, my brother worked at Doge.

Nux Taku: No way.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah,

Nux Taku: yeah. Dude, that’s awesome.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah. Huh. That was,

Nux Taku: I’m a big fan of Doge. I wish they would’ve been like even more successful.

Simone Collins: Same.

Malcolm Collins: They, they did some really cool stuff. Now

Nux Taku: to something

Malcolm Collins: completely different.

Nux Taku: But that’s where like

Simone Collins: I’m hesitant- They, they shut down-

about policy in general. I, I, I have my doubts that like- Any, any sort of policy change is gonna make a, a difference at this point or like going into politics matters I

Nux Taku: mean, I think we, we need to get rid of the government. Okay? I

Simone Collins: only

Nux Taku: want the government- That’s, that’s my only conclusion here ... to exist for law and order.

I just want law and order. Arrest the criminals, [00:47:00] close the border, win wars if you need to fight them. Other than that, I really don’t wanna hear about you guys

Simone Collins: Well, and the writing is kind of on the wall. Like what we talk about a lot is demographic collapse, and when you look at just how tax bases are going to crumble, how social services won’t be able to be supported anymore, how our government’s basically going to start printing currency in really unsustainable ways- Yeah

until it no longer matters like there, there will be a point at which there is going to be actually very significant various forms of turnover in the government. So I’m kind of like, well, I guess I’m just gonna- So

Malcolm Collins: like Social Security, how long till it goes broke?

Simone Collins: I think 2032. 2030 something.

Yeah, 2032. Well, my concern is, like there’s two ways it can go. Either at, at that year the trust fund’s gonna run out to the point where y- the existing senior citizens receiving Social Security payments will have like 32 or something percent less of their monthly checks. So they’re gonna be super pissed while like Gen Z and Gen Alpha and millennials and everyone else is still paying into it knowing that they’re not gonna get anything, and the people who are getting their money are mad about it and resentful.

So everyone’s [00:48:00] gonna be really angry about it. Or they’re gonna do something where they just totally throw the rules out the window and they’re like, “Oh, never mind, everyone gets to keep their money,” and they just kind of print it out of nowhere. And- It’s

Nux Taku: almost like Social Security is a form of communism that doesn’t really work.

Simone Collins: Yeah. We live in a huge, like just in terms of social services, like we are in such a socialist state now. If you are at or near the poverty level, the amount of support that you get from your state and the federal government is, is kind of humbling, and we didn’t realize this until we looked into it. But like in most cases especially if you ca- have kids, food assistance home assistance, free childcare, i- like really in- intense levels of support that are, are, are...

Oh free healthcare, which is like huge. So you kind of do live in a socialist utopia if you are at or near the poverty level. We

Malcolm Collins: offer many times the social services cost adjusted than China does.

Simone Collins: Yeah. Like in China- Which is another- ... public school isn’t free. In

Nux Taku: fact, our, our social services, I’m pretty sure they, they out...

Like th- if you combine the military budget and the foreign aid budget, it’s still [00:49:00] dwarfed by the social services.

Malcolm Collins: Oh,

Simone Collins: yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And then of course pensions and then of course like debt servicing. Like it just- I mean, the true

Malcolm Collins: enemy of civilization-

Nux Taku: Again, I, I mention I am a, a Pentateuch extremist, okay?

All right? Like the- Yeah ... it, there are, there is no communism in the Bible. None of it, actually, you know? That’s unfair. You give whatever-

Simone Collins: What is your point? ...

Nux Taku: 10% to charity, okay? Charity, whatever, whatever you wanna define as charity. And other than that, what you make is yours. From the sweat of your brow you should eat bread.

Simone Collins: There you go.

Nux Taku: And that’s it. And I’m tired of it. The, one, one of the first chapters in the Bible is like Abraham, he goes to Ephron to buy a, a plot of land where he could bury his wife. And he’s like, “Hey, I would like to buy the land.” And Ephron’s like, “No, no, you don’t need to buy the land. Just bury your wife here.”

And he’s like, “No, no, no, I’m buying the land. We’re not, we’re not getting into this.” This like, “Oopsie whoopsie.” And he’s like, “Okay, it’ll cost X amount.” And and he bought it, and it was his. And you know what? We still know where that land is exactly in Hebron. We know where it is. We know that you know, all the patriarchs and matriarchs are buried [00:50:00] there et cetera, et cetera.

And it’s like it’s still there, you know? There’s no, no repossessing- Yes ... you know, redistributing. I-

Simone Collins: And in,

Malcolm Collins: I did not know that that was still known or wasn’t. The the I- I mean we also know from, you know, Adam and Eve and everything like that, that like we are supposed to live with having to, to work the land.

Like, we’re supposed to have to work to support ourselves, and it

Nux Taku: makes- And so do you wanna hear another theory?

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, o- ca- continue.

Nux Taku: Yes. Another theory. So God, all right, th- this is the same topic. God cursed both Adam and Eve when they ate from the tree of knowledge, right? Mm-hmm. So Adam’s curse was the sweat of, from the sweat of your brow you shall eat bread, all right?

Meaning you have to work to eat, as opposed to just, you know, God’ll just give you all the things for free. And Eve’s punishment was, you know, men will rule over you and it, you know, it’ll be painful. The child birthing process will be painful, right? So that was Eve’s punishment. Now I would argue not only, first of all, obviously true, right?

Yeah. That, that actually did happen to humans for, since then. That’s one. But [00:51:00] two, it’s necessary. It’s part of our psyche to feel fulfilled as people to exist in a system where the man works and where women are ultimately respecting men.

Malcolm Collins: We- and we actually, this is another one of our spicy takes, but we, yeah, we argue that as well, that like God was not being capriciously cruel to humanity by giving what we interpreted as curses, but giving us a way of living that is fulfilling, and that as we have shaken off this way of living, we realize that this was more like training wheels than a genuine punishment.

Simone Collins: Yeah. And things

Nux Taku: like, And now you have, and now everyone’s depressed. Yeah. Like, the men don’t work and they’re depressed. Now the women don’t have kids and they’re depressed, and it’s like-

Malcolm Collins: And they’re not a little- Yeah, yeah ... depressed. Right now the average kid at school, during COVID it was one in four, now it’s one in five, the average girl makes a plan to un-alive herself on any given year.

That is how sa- that is how-

Simone Collins: Well, the weird thing is, is- Damn ... women in the absence of pain crave pain

Malcolm Collins: This

Simone Collins: is CDC

Malcolm Collins: stats, by the way. Not,

Simone Collins: like, a,

Malcolm Collins: a right-wing conspiracy

Simone Collins: Yeah, [00:52:00] but I mean, if you look at just anecdotally, women in the absence of pain crave pain. When women live in... Like, if, if you look at spoonies, they’re majority affluent teen girls who basically have no other pain in their lives, and they’re like, “I’ve been developed-” Well, look at, look at women’s books

“This mysterious disease” It’s all, like, dystopian futures where they, they live in- Yeah. Yeah, women growing up in, in peaceful times with no conflict love to read dystopian teen novels. I’m reading Lena Dunham, L- Lena Dunham, Dunham’s fame sick biography now, and, like, she had horrible partners who would do violent, awful things to her ‘cause she grew up in a, like, loving family that always supported her.

Like, there’s... It’s kind of sick how people respond when, yeah, they grow up in sort of the absence- ... of pain and strife. It, it is one of those things where like, yeah And if, if you

Nux Taku: ever wanna get radicalized, you go into, like, a Barnes & Noble women’s section-

Simone Collins: Yeah ...

Nux Taku: and it’s like, yo- Yeah,

Malcolm Collins: we

Nux Taku: talk about

Malcolm Collins: that. I get

Nux Taku: so- We- You know, woman was raped by a werewolf billionaire and fell in love with him.

I, I- It’s like-

Simone Collins: Living the dream

Malcolm Collins: We, we get so annoyed by... Because there’s some right-wing influencer, women especially, who are like, “Oh, it’s all of this [00:53:00] male porn that, like, radicalized men.” I’m like, “Men didn’t make 50 Shades of Gray a bestseller.” Yeah. Men didn’t make The Monster at Barnes & Noble, right? Like-

Simone Collins: No, l- legit, men don’t wanna do that on average because it’s too much effort.

This is definitely a female fantasy. Men are like, “I don’t have... I don’t, no.” I

Nux Taku: mean, I, I think also because men, men are mostly stimulated by, I guess, superficial attributes, I would say. You know? Mm-hmm. A sexy woman, and that’s it. Men, he’s good. You know, you see some curvy piece of driftwood and, you know-

men are like, “We can figure this out.” But for women-

Simone Collins: No, no, like literally- ... I think a lot, a lot of it’s- ... Malcolm and I had a conversation last night ...

Nux Taku: you have to get emotionally

Simone Collins: invested, you know? Yeah. We were... I, I... Like, Malcolm walked up to me last night and I was like, “Malcolm, how do... With sex dolls, how do they deal with, like, the off-gassing scent?

Like, doesn’t that really... Like, there must be some way.” Malcolm’s like, “No, Simone, they don’t care. Like, it looks like a woman.” Like, I’m talking about for real dolls, like, the, the life-sized ones. Yeah. And I’m, like, thinking about how, like, well, it must smell too much like plastic. Like, how do you deal with that?

And he’s like-

Nux Taku: Men do [00:54:00] not care. Men do not care.

Simone Collins: Oh, well. Anyway.

Nux Taku: You know- So I think w- a- get- the Monster F****r Island Barnes & Noble, that’s just as porn as any male porn. Oh,

Simone Collins: it- Oh, yeah. Yeah. Like- Yeah ... but not, not even that, just, like, all, all the erotic materials. Women consume way more erotic materials, period, than men.

And pay way more for it. And the, and the industry’s bigger. It’s, it’s more, there’s more money there. There’s more time there. And women are just openly reading it like, in public. It’s just no shame. They’re, they’re learned women. It’s book talk. It’s great. They, they talk about

Nux Taku: it. The whoreification of society.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. True. True. Well, it has been great. I do not want to take up too much of the time of, of Nux. I want to have a channel where you can reach out to us whenever. One thing I want to end with, with people, because I think the, what one of our goals should be to make people’s lives better, and that’s, you know, if, if you’re watching this, go out and try to learn something new.

You know, learn how to use AI in a new way. Learn how to use some tool in a new way. Society right now is changing faster than [00:55:00] anyone could imagine, and we’re seeing it in our community to an extent that astonishes me, because I get so excited when I see, like, Sky Browse and stuff like this, or Holy Ball.

You know, when I see these, these content creators who are pioneering entirely new ways of doing stuff and you, you can be that. Any of you can be that in, in, in new ways. And look for a sp- a s- a spouse, a partner. Try harder.

Nux Taku: Yeah, that, that’s what I was gonna say. You know? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, get married, have babies.

It’s awesome.

Simone Collins: Totally.

Malcolm Collins: Really makes life awesome. Well, spectacular. I’m gonna turn the recording off and, Oh, anything you wanna say at the end? Any-

Simone Collins: Yeah, anything you want people to go to, check out,

Nux Taku: whatever. I’m, I’m good, I’m good.

Malcolm Collins: Everybody knows who you are. I’m

Nux Taku: the Blue Jew. I wander over YouTube.

Malcolm Collins: Right there. Like, we have, like, you’re, like, our fifth most over subscribed channel, so just... End recording? Oh,

Nux Taku: hell yeah.

Simone Collins: Oh. I’m trying to get Tex to eat, and I, I took a little video ‘cause the one thing that he actually does wanna put in his mouth, ‘cause I, I keep giving him stuff obviously he immediately just, you know, like they fall out of his mouth, right?

That’s what... [00:56:00] It always happens, right? They look kind of,

Malcolm Collins: afraid,

Simone Collins: and then it falls out of their mouth. And the, the one thing that he likes that I’ve noticed he chews on is veggie straws. So I’ve, you know, let him chew on like the odd veggie straw here or there, and he was chewing on them this morning, and I was taking this video of him, and he just starts-

Malcolm Collins: Octavian thought it was the funniest thing ever.

He came in. He had to tell me. He goes, “Mommy was filming.”

Simone Collins: I thought, “Oh, let’s capture his first moments eating.” I don’t want our kids to, like, think that... You know how there’s the trope of, like, the first kid has, like, a billion photos. You get bored after the first few? Yeah, okay. Yeah, like, yeah, like second kid, no photos of anything, you know?

And I don’t wanna be that mom, and I’m trying to capture these precious moments. And what does Tex do? What does Tex do when I try to capture a precious moment? He’s like... Immense amounts- I’m sorry you had to deal with that ... of liquid. He, he doesn’t like drinking that much, so I don’t know where it’s coming from.

Malcolm Collins: I am very sorry you had to deal with this.

Simone Collins: It’s a pleasure

Yeah, see, [00:57:00] he doesn’t wanna drink. You have no interest in drinking. You just wanna wave your hands and grab my headphones.

Oh, he’s here. Hey. Oh my gosh, that’s a good background. Oh,

Malcolm Collins: we got an American flag in the background. That’s fantastic.

Simone Collins: That’s perfect.

Malcolm Collins: Okay.

Simone Collins: Okay. Can we hear him? Yeah, I was thinking,

Nux Taku: like- Go ahead ... do, do I put an Israeli flag in the... No, I’m kidding. Yeah.

Simone Collins: Oh. That would’ve been-

Malcolm Collins: I would, I would troll people

wonderful. They’re gonna get some, Yeah ... spicy comments from that. Oh. For

Simone Collins: real.

Malcolm Collins: Okay.

Nux Taku: Yeah. I’m

Malcolm Collins: gonna dive right in. Well, it’s such a

Nux Taku: pleasure to meet you guys.

Malcolm Collins: Oh, yeah,

Simone Collins: likewise. It’s really good to meet you, too.

Malcolm Collins: It’s, it’s so huge to be doing something, because we’ve done, like, peers. We’ve done bigger people before, but I’ve never done anyone who I watch as much as you.

Yeah. So,

Simone Collins: like- No, you’re, like, liter- like, literally part of, like, the wallpaper- ... of, of our every... I mean, you know how it is. Like, you, you’re just, you’re always on. So we hear your voice all the time, and it’s, it’s really weird. Wow. It’s one of those things- That’s crazy ... I think we haven’t even thought to do

Malcolm Collins: that.

E- even today you helped me win an argument with my wife. Yeah, it’s true. Because she got big mad- Let’s go ... about a title card that I made today. Yeah. And she’s like, “That implies that Black people, there’s a portion of Black Americans that want [00:58:00] white Americans dead.” And I’m like, “It’s true.” And then you said the same thing in your title, and I was like, “See, Simone?”

Simone Collins: Yeah. I was like, “Well, if Nux says it, okay.” But also, yeah,

Nux Taku: I mean- Listen, I’m not, I’m not an authority here, but what other interpretation would there be to these guys crashing out that Carmelo Anthony’s going to jail? Like-

Malcolm Collins: That-

Simone Collins: Yeah ... is there another explanation? I hadn’t seen that footage, and now I have.

And now I’m very alarmed. I know.

Malcolm Collins: I mean, I, I do, I think that they think that they should be treated differently by the law. I think that that’s, like... W- we’ll get into that later.

Speaker: Yeah, I think he likes it. Oh, he’s still figuring out how to swallow solid foods after he chews them. See? He’s kinda going through it. He doesn’t really know how to swallow food. Oh, it d- oh, okay. Oh, dear. Well, you know.

Speaker 2: He threw up. Oh, boy. There it goes. He threw up. Oh, God.

You think it’s so freaking funny. [00:59:00] You don’t have to clean it up.

Malcolm and Simone Collins break down the growing public anger over glaring double standards in interracial violence, media coverage, and the justice system. They dive deep into the Kamelo Anthony case (the stabbing of Austin Metcalf at a Texas track meet), European migrant crime incidents, fundraising scandals, jury selection disparities, crime statistics, and the disturbing normalization of anti-white violence.

This episode explores why many feel the law is applied unequally, the oppressor/oppressed worldview driving it, immigration realities, and what a realistic path forward looks like — including building a broad, accountable coalition rather than narrow racial politics. A raw, data-heavy discussion on race, crime, culture, and civilization in 2026.

Watch the full Based Camp episode for unfiltered analysis.

Show Notes

The Flash Point Cases

2026 Karmelo Anthony Murder Judgment

* On June 9, 2026, a Texas jury found 19-year-old Karmelo Anthony guilty of murder for fatally stabbing 17-year-old track athlete Austin Metcalf at a high school track meet in Frisco, Texas, on April 2, 2025.

* Anthony was subsequently sentenced to 35 years in prison

2025 Dublin case

* A 20-something illegal migrant from believed to be from Africa (with prior deportation orders) allegedly sexually assaulted a 10-year-old Irish girl in state care at a hotel housing asylum seekers

* This triggered riots, vehicle burnings, and clashes

June 2026 Belfast Knife Attack

* On 40-something white Stephen Ogilvy by Hadi Alodid, a Sudanese refugee granted status in 2023

* Hadi Alodid was charged with attempted murder (but there was immediate unrest over immigration)

What people are saying online

Media angles (echoed on social): “Is the far right exploiting the attack by a refugee?” with focus on disorder rather than root causes like vetting. (e.g. FRANCE 24 - Europe posted: “Is the far right exploiting the ‘sickening’ attack by a refugee in Belfast?”

Depa wrote: Kristallnacht in #Belfast begins:

Masked thugs smash windows of houses of black& brown people after Sudanese immigrant tries to kill (Scottish?) man in a brutal knife attack

Houses were also torched, mobs attacked POC in Glasgow after far right influencers called for protests..

iResist wrote: Anti-immigrant far right thugs in the city of Belfast in the UK have torched vehicles and buildings after a Sudanese man was arrested over a knife attack that left one person with serious injuries.

Masked men are hunting immigrants in the city.

April 2026 Belgium Kortrijk gang rape

* Nine migrant minors (from various non-Western backgrounds) gang-raped a 14-year-old Belgian schoolgirl (”loaned out“ among them).

* “The abuse took place during the Easter holidays in April 2024 in the Kabouterbos, a wooded area in Kortrijk. The victim was 14 at the time, while the suspects were aged between 11 and 16” (ReMix News)

* She was lured into the woods by her then-16-year-old boyfriend

* They filmed her rape and posted videos to snapchat

* All were found guilty but received no prison

* Instead, they got probation/community service (30 hours max).

* Their lenient treatment was criticized as emblematic of soft juvenile justice for migrant offenders

What people are saying online

Critics of outrage call it disproportionate or ignoring similar intra-native cases.

Per Al Jazeera, Sikh/Muslim/immigrant advocacy groups are distancing themselves from the perpetrator while documenting rising hate incidents.

December 2025 Henry Nowak Stabbing Case

* 18-year-old White university student Henry Nowak was stabbed to death (multiple times with an 8-inch Sikh ceremonial dagger/kirpan) by 23-year-old Vickrum Digwa (Sikh).

* Digwa and his brother falsely claimed to police that Nowak had racially attacked him (grabbing turban, slurs).

* Police initially handcuffed the dying Nowak based on this.

* Digwa was convicted of murder in 2026; the judge called the racism claim a “wicked lie.”

* It sparked major outrage, questions from PM Keir Starmer about how racism accusations influenced police, and reviews of policing. Critics argued initial response prioritized the false hate claim over the victim’s life

What people said online

Hebb Rule is Enough fir AGI/A Creative I - Jayan wrote: “The Sikh man and his family are not walking around looking to stab people. Henry Nowak was a drunk racist abusing the Punjabi and got what he deserved. The police correctly identified the drunk aggressor and just didn’t realise he was stabbed.”

Bakara Amuri wrote:

🚨😳SIKS ARE FIGHTING BACK…. UNPRECEDENTED MOVES🇬🇧

Innocent Sikhs have been targeted, while the elderly and vulnerable are

being urged to stay indoors, following the sentencing of Vickrum Digwa.

Amarjeet Singh, from Hounslow in west London, has launched a website for Sikhs across the country to report incidents of hate crime.

The site has received numerous reports in the past five days, with many respondents believing the abuse they experienced was linked to Digwa’s conviction.

Will you report any anti sikhs “crimes”?

The British Sikh Report 2025 found:

49% of British Sikhs were already worried about rising anti‑Sikh sentiment.

Many reported being mistaken for Muslims or targeted simply for wearing a turban.

according to the report here is the reason why:

“far‑right mobilisation”

Is There Really a Policing Double Standard?

The standard understanding is that there is a double standard, but it’s in favor of whites and to the detriment of non-whites.

Per organizations like The Sentencing Project: Evidence from policing, sentencing, and media coverage shows racial double standards do exist—but they do not take the form of “non‑white offenders being treated more leniently on average.” Instead, the consistent pattern in U.S. research is harsher treatment of Black and other non‑white suspects/defendants, especially when victims are white, and more sympathetic social treatment of white offenders.

A 2021 study of co‑offending partners found that Black offenders were significantly more likely than white co‑offenders to be arrested for the same incident, especially in assault cases. That is, when a Black and a white suspect commit an offense together, police are more likely to formally arrest the Black suspect, indicating differential enforcement rather than equal treatment.

Interracial Crime Realities

One thing people are discussing online is the reality of mixed-race attacks/crimes

First: Most violent crime in the U.S. is intraracial: people tend to victimize members of their own racial group. In 2020, about 69% of violent incidents against white victims and 66% against Black victims involved an offender of the same race or ethnicity. That means “white‑on‑Black” or “Black‑on‑white” crimes are a relatively small subset of overall violence, not the dominant pattern (as reported by the US Department of Justice)

Per a 2024 Department of Justice Report, which provides counts and percentages of violent incidents by the race/Hispanic origin of victims and offenders, based on victims’ perceptions:

* White‑on‑non‑white* (white offenders, non‑white victims):

* White‑on‑black: 57,370

* White‑on‑Hispanic: 334,770

* White‑on‑“other”: 217,140

* Total white‑on‑non‑white ≈ 609,000 incidents.

* Non‑white‑on‑white (non‑white offenders, white victims):

* Black‑on‑white: 536,120

* Hispanic‑on‑white: 271,410

* “Other”‑on‑white: 262,120

* Total non‑white‑on‑white ≈ 1,070,000 incidents.

*Here “non‑white” = black, Hispanic, and “other” race categories.

These tallies exclude incidents where offender race is unknown or mixed‑race groups that the table pushes into “other”; they are best understood as approximate patterns rather than precise totals of “all interracial incidents”.

General Findings:

* The authors highlight that the share of violent incidents with white offenders (47%) is smaller than whites’ share of the population (60%).

* They also note that the share of incidents with black offenders (28%) is more than double blacks’ share of the population (12%).

* Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Other Pacific Islander persons are underrepresented as both victims and offenders relative to their population share.

Key interracial/intraracial findings in their terms

From table 13 (incidents by victim and offender race/Hispanic origin):

* White victims experienced about 3.42 million violent incidents in 2024.

* Of these, about 1.71 million incidents involved white offenders (intra‑racial), while about 0.54 million involved black offenders and about 0.27 million involved Hispanic offenders.

* Black victims experienced about 0.77 million violent incidents.

* Of these, about 0.40 million involved black offenders (intra‑racial), vs about 0.06 million with white offenders and about 0.12 million with Hispanic offenders.

* Hispanic victims experienced about 1.16 million violent incidents, with roughly 0.27 million involving Hispanic offenders, and substantial numbers involving white or black offenders.

These joint victim–offender counts allow you to identify which victim–offender race pairings are more common in terms of incident counts but still are not presented as “rates of interracial crime” in the report’s framing.

Key incident counts from Table 13 (2024 NCVS legacy)

All numbers below are counts of violent incidents, based on victims’ perception of offender race/Hispanic origin.

* Total violent incidents involving white victims: 3,421,720.

* White offender: 1,706,750

* Black offender: 536,120

* Hispanic offender: 271,410

* “Other” race offender: 262,120

* Offender race unknown: 645,320

* Total violent incidents involving black victims: 773,420.

* White offender: 57,370

* Black offender: 402,960

* Hispanic offender: 121,880 (flagged “interpret with caution”)

* “Other” race offender: 54,360 (caution)

* Offender race unknown: 136,850

* Total violent incidents involving Hispanic victims: 1,160,980.

* White offender: 334,770

* Black offender: 288,130

* Hispanic offender: 274,230

* “Other” race offender: 36,930 (caution)

* Offender race unknown: 226,920

* Total violent incidents involving “other” (Asian, NHPI, AIAN, multiracial) victims: 719,720.

* White offender: 217,140

* Black offender: 144,420

* Hispanic offender: 128,240 (caution)

* “Other” race offender: 106,310 (caution)

* Offender race unknown: 123,600

Limitations of the report

* The NCVS relies on victim self-report and perceived offender race, so all offender race numbers are based on perception, not official records.

* It does not publish a simple table that directly says “X% of white victims were victimized by non‑white offenders” or “rate of interracial victimization per 1,000 by victim race”; you would need to derive that from the incident table and separate population denominators.

Episode Transcript

Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] hello, Simone. Crazy times we live in. It seems like we’re heading right into one of these.

Speaker 2: It seems to be a survival guide of some kind. Survival of what? From the looks of it, a contagion outbreak of the worst kind.

Speaker 4: Oh my God.

Malcolm Collins: But we are right now, and what we’re going to take this episode to go over is a sea change in public opinion around racial relationships, and I think the beginning of a realization that a portion of America and the wider Western world simply did not at all care when white people died. And, and this is kind of shocking to say, but we right now had a situation where basically being a white American was beginning to feel like this

Speaker 10: This is about protecting people, ,

Speaker 9: something’s wrong.

Speaker 10: Look [00:01:00] out! You did what you had to. You’re a hero. That may be true, but I’ll have to live with this the rest of my life, even though I’ll be walking around a free man.

Hey, wait a minute. This kid

Isn’t just white

Is a Mormon with a large Lego company

Speaker 10: Wait, what?

Speaker 9: Guilty.

Malcolm Collins: My God. A- and, and when people are like, oh... Because you see on a lot of the conservative bloggers, and I’m, I’m not gonna rehash all this, have shown you the protesters outside of the Anthony trial.

Speaker 19: What do you want us to do? That’s right. What, what do you want us to do at this point? What? I, I, I’m, I’m lost for word. I don’t know what to do. I got five boys. I don’t know what, I ain’t got nothing to tell them no more.

Speaker 21: play out since then and what we’re watch happening now is because

Malcolm Collins: Mm-hmm. Which we’ll go over which was very, very open-and-shut case and really i- [00:02:00] insane.

They ended up raising $600,000 for the case moving into a $900,000 house and then-

Simone Collins: Wait ... the- The family of the attacker?

Malcolm Collins: Yes. Then he had to be, he had to s- s- basically sue the court and say, “I’m, I’m destitute,” and be repor- like supported by a public defendant. Yeah.

Simone Collins: Wait, wait, wait, wait, wait. So wh- Oh, okay.

The attacker’s family raised a ton of money but said they were destitute?

Malcolm Collins: Y- basically, they raised a ton of money. Uh-huh. They spent all of the money on personal things- Oh ... and then they said they didn’t have- And then they couldn’t afford- ... enough money to get like a defender. Oh. And they have personally reported to the media, “Oh, we didn’t do that.”

And so like Snopes will say like, “Oh, this isn’t true,” but it’s one of those things where Snopes is so ideologically captured at this point, if you just... Then why is he [00:03:00] using a public defendant if he raised $600,000? Why do they have a new house? W- like, a- and why are, do they admit they have a new house in their own social media postings?

There, there, there was a, a incorrect accusation at one point that they had done this, which is the funny thing, is basically the right accused them of doing this before they actually did it. Oh, and they

Simone Collins: were like, “That’s a great idea.”

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, but they’re like, “Yeah, we can prove we haven’t withdrawn the money yet.”

And then like literally just weeks later, “Now we withdrew the money and bought a new house.” Oh,

Simone Collins: huh.

Malcolm Collins: But anyway, so, we have people like Cardi B saying I don’t know if you saw... Like, so it’s not just the crazy people outside of this place, like, a- and, and saying that he got a new car by the way.

Simone Collins: Oh, no.

Malcolm Collins: Where

Simone Collins: is- Is, so is this his brother? Because just to be, to be clear, I know, and most people have heard about this, but what happened was in December of 2025, a, an 18-year-old white university student named Henry Noak was stabbed to death multiple times with an [00:04:00] eight-inch Sikh ceremonial dagger.

So this was also like specifically a- What are we

Malcolm Collins: talking about? That’s, that’s not what we’re talking about right now. We’re talking about the Anthony- Wait,

Simone Collins: which case are you talking about?

Malcolm Collins: The Anthony case.

Simone Collins: Okay, sorry. The- There are so many. Who is, who is, where-

what, who, Anth-

Malcolm Collins: sorry. I- We’re talking about the Anthony case, the Black guy who stabbed a white track star to death.

Simone Collins: Oh, God. I didn’t even come across that. I have all these other cases that I looked at. This is becoming way too much of a pattern Wait, do

Malcolm Collins: you even, there are so many random killings of white people

Simone Collins: Yeah, no.

So there’s the 2025 Dublin case where a, a 20-something illegal immigrant believed to be from Africa allegedly assaulted a 10-year-old Irish girl, and then that triggered a bunch of riots. And then there’s a, the June 2026 Belfast knife attack

Malcolm Collins: where

Simone Collins: a 40, a 40-something white, Stephen O’Gifley, and, and was, was stabbed by a Sudanese refugee who was granted status in 2023, and then he was charged with attempted murder.

But after, immediately [00:05:00] after that stabbing took place, obviously there was a lot of unrest over immigration. And then there was the April 2026 Belgian case of group unplanned surprise sex in a forest. H- I don’t know how else to put this. Basically nine migrant minors from various non-Western backgrounds gang- the prize sex attacked a 14-year-old Belgian schoolgirl who they filmed a- attacking in a forest after she was lured there by her 16-year-old boyfriend.

And then posted it on Snapchat. And they were, they were found guilty, but they didn’t receive any prison sentences. They, they got 30 hours max of community service.

Malcolm Collins: No prison sentences?

Simone Collins: Yeah. Just, you know, clean the f- clean the highway for 30 hours and we’re good. We’re-

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. You’re not even finding the ones that I’m finding.

Like, did you- Yeah.

Simone Collins: Then, then there’s the, the, the Henry Nowek case, which, which I’ve been hearing about the most on social media-

Malcolm Collins: That’s the most famous- With the, this huge- But we’ll go over that later ‘cause everyone’s aware of the [00:06:00] details of it ...

Simone Collins: dagger. And then there’s w- well, wait, so who, who’s this tracker?

Wait,

Malcolm Collins: hold

Simone Collins: on. I’ve never even heard of

Malcolm Collins: this- You didn’t even find the Sudanese guy who just yesterday attacked- No ... a mentally disabled man in Ireland?

Simone Collins: No, and I look at the headlines every single morning. I look at X, I look at Drudge, I look at New York Times- Or

Malcolm Collins: the four- I look at Twitchy ... Iraqi guys who did a drive-by, killed a 14-year-old girl, in I wanna say Germany.

No. They then moved her body off the road. The police lied to the girl’s mom, saying that it was a German who did it.

Simone Collins: And- Oh, for the love ...

Malcolm Collins: and then when the mom basically found out and did an investigation, she found out that none of the men even served any jail time. They, they said, “Oh, it’s a, it’s a regular hit and run,” even though they knew that they had moved her body off the road.

Oh, for the- Right? Like, they, they are actively covering this up.

Simone Collins: Yeah, not e- not even a hit and run, a hit and hide.

Malcolm Collins: My God. So what I’m talking about, this is happening so frequently in our society now, like

Simone Collins: we, we even- Like, the, the news cycle can’t even keep up with it. It’s like, I don’t know.” No, news cycle can’t keep up with it.

It’s, it’s, now, now it’s like that South Park episode on school shootings of like, “Wait, you [00:07:00] got an F on your math test?”

Speaker 34: Stanley, well, do you want to tell your father about what happened at school today?

Speaker 35: I flunked my math quiz.

Speaker 34: No, the other thing.

Speaker 36: What other thing?

Speaker 35: Oh, the school shooting? Yes, the school shooting! Oh yeah, some kids shot up the school.

Speaker 36: Was it you?

Speaker 35: No.

Speaker 36: Did you get shot?

Speaker 35: No.

Speaker 36: Oh. Well, what’s this about failing a math quiz?

Malcolm Collins: Well, and the expectation that there will be no repercussions if you kill a white person- Mm ... has gotten so extreme that you will even have not just these crazies, like, outside a courtroom, but Cardi B tweeted, “Wow, just wow.

Disgusting. This is not justice. This is trying to make an example.”

, So we’ll go over the case of, of the Anthony case, which a lot of people are talking about now, and you’ll get to hear about for the first time, Simone.

Simone Collins: Yes, tell me about this track star?

Malcolm Collins: No, the core thing that everybody’s whining about with the Anthony case, like the other side, is they [00:08:00] go, “There were no Black jurors.”

Here’s the problem. Only three Black people showed up for jury selection in this case. Oh, dear. That we are aware of.

Simone Collins: Yeah, that’s-

Malcolm Collins: Black people, it turns out, show up for jury selection at an extremely low rate. They show

Simone Collins: up- Oh, like even disproportionate to their share of the US population?

Malcolm Collins: Yes. So 44% of the time, Black people are non-responsive to jury summons.

While this is a-

Simone Collins: Well, I think also they dis- disproportionately may serve in jobs that are, like, hourly, and it’s really hard to get time off. You lose shifts, you lose your job. Like- It

Malcolm Collins: could be. I mean, it, it could also be less a sense of civic duty. Like, we don’t know, right? But they, they don’t show up for jury nearly as much as...

What, whites show up, they only have a no-show rate of 12%. Okay Extremely low.

Simone Collins: Okay.

Malcolm Collins: And the three Blacks that did show up were dismissed for normal reasons, which is they were educators. And in cases involving minors, it is normal to dismiss educators. That’s just a normal part- Why is that? What?

Simone Collins: Why would that [00:09:00] be?

Malcolm Collins: Because they’re seen as being overly sympathetic to minors.

Simone Collins: Oh, I thought they’d be overly prejudicial. It’s like, “I’m fed up with these kids. Put them in jail.” Like, minors are now This is my chance to fight back. Oh,

Malcolm Collins: okay. Well, and another thing I wanna talk about that we’ll get to in the end here is all this sort of performative racism we’re seeing from the conservative side, where it’s, like, obvious they’re not real racists.

It’s like, on our channel, us pretending to be racist, and I’m gonna do that whitest kids you know skit- Oh, God. Not again ...

Speaker 12: all right. Guess I’m just gonna have to come out and say it. Now, don’t be mad, but I’m a little bit of a racist.

Speaker 11: Oh, really? You’re a racist?

Speaker 12: Yep.

Speaker 11: No, you’re not.

Speaker 12: What?

Speaker 11: No, you’re not.

Speaker 12: I am. I’m racist every day, all the time.

Speaker 11: Well, call me the N-word.

Speaker 12: What? Why?

Speaker 11: Call me the N-word.[00:10:00]

Speaker 12: I, I would. I love slaves.

Speaker 11: You love slaves? -

Speaker 12: ery I love slavery.

Speaker 11: And what is it exactly that you love about slavery?

Speaker 12: I, I think it’s awesome that you people... Not you people. Yes, you people have to work for free all the time.

Simone Collins: Which I forget on cue again. Oh, yay.

Malcolm Collins: But let’s go over the, It, it, oh, I’ll, I’ll, I’ll quickly go over the, the money and the fundraising. So they raised 634, 4K. What it appears happened is first they were accused of buying luxury things with it before they actually withdrew it.

Then they withdrew it, hired a lawyer, right? Who was a real lawyer who they did use for a period. But then after that period was over, and it seems that, like, through most of the middle of the trial, while they were able to retain him, they don’t [00:11:00] appear to be able to have kept him on board throughout the entire trial as the main lawyer.

This is Mike Howard. And then they had a state defendant. So it is, it is, there’s no way that could happen other than spending the money. Because they would need to prove to the courts that they don’t have enough money to continue to hire a lawyer. Oh,

Simone Collins: that’s true. Yeah. That they just don’t... Right?

Yeah, so I believe- Or I, I think, I think, can’t anyone request a, a public defendant? Let me quickly check that, ‘cause it could just be even not based on

Malcolm Collins: financial- Yeah, they need to prove something called, Resisting public despite the fundrai- in indigent status and indigent status means... I mean, it’s very similar to the Black Lives Matter scam where they, they bought mansions and stuff like that with the money that was meant for Black Lives Matter and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

It, it, it, it, it designates an individual as impoverished

Simone Collins: but verify. We’re, we’re, we’re peer reviewing this. You ask Grok, I’m asking Perplexity. Like, as Mingold does. In the US, you only get a court-appointed public [00:12:00] defender if, one, you are facing a charge that can lead to jail or prison. Oh, that’s this person. Or two, the court finds you cannot afford to hire your own lawyer.

You are indigent under the jurisdiction’s rules. So no, this, this person was facing a charge that could lead to jail or prison. Presumably then they could choose to have a public defender. Well,

Malcolm Collins: th- whatever. They claimed were indigent. They claim to be impoverished. That’s th- th- they- They

Simone Collins: really, like, that’s, that’s, that is attested.

It is, it is- That

Malcolm Collins: is what’s attested by them, is they don’t have any money left. And I get really annoyed that even Snopes now is, like, going to bat for them when, like, the fact, why would you hire a court-appointed attorney if you still had the money? And they had the money at one point. So where did

Simone Collins: the money go?

That is true. That is true. Regardless of what they’re saying, it- if they’re choosing to not spend this money... I mean, I, I, if I’m really trying to steel man this, maybe they had a, a falling out or they lost faith in the lawyer and were like, “Look, I just, we have to keep going. There’s an- another hearing. We can’t miss it.

We don’t have time to [00:13:00] find another lawyer. You know, no one’s willing to work with us. We gotta use a d- public defendant.”

Malcolm Collins: No, they could have hired another lawyer. They had plenty of time. They didn’t have the money. Oh.

Simone Collins: Wow.

Malcolm Collins: S- anyway, to the points of the case, and, and, and, and this is where-

Simone Collins: Here’s, here’s another thing, though.

And ‘cause I was th- when I thought you were describing the Sikh family, but it could just be a case of a family cutting their losses. Like, “Look, I know that my kid- We- we’re just gonna write this kid off? The best thing we can do is, like, raise money for the rest of our family and do the best we can

Malcolm Collins: and- Well, and the family’s raising money again now after the conviction, by the way.

So they’re like, “Oh, the great way to raise a bunch of money.”

Simone Collins: Look, you know, if you have a fail son, and your fail son’s gonna get locked away for life-

Malcolm Collins: That’s generational wealth right there.

Simone Collins: I mean, the reparations. It’s... I don’t know. Like, maybe there’s some psychology to it all.

Malcolm Collins: Anyway, to continue on April 2nd, 2025, at a high school track meet in Frisco, Texas during a rainstorm, 17-year-old Kamiller [00:14:00] Anthony from Centennial High sought shelter under the tent of Memorial High School’s team.

Austin Metcalf, 17, and others told Anthony to leave. It was their team’s tent. Words were exchanged. Anthony reportedly said something like, “Touch me and see what happens,” while reaching into his bag.

Simone Collins: Oh, boy.

Malcolm Collins: Metcalf pushed or grabbed Anthony to remove him, so he intentionally tried to physically try to remove him.

And note it’s been attested that they asked him to leave something like 20 or 30 times-

Simone Collins: Oh ...

Malcolm Collins: beforehand, and it w- he clearly wasn’t supposed to be there. It was not his tent.

Simone Collins: Okay ...

Malcolm Collins: and while they, note, they didn’t hit, they didn’t beat him, they, they merely tried to- They just tried

Simone Collins: to, like, pick him up and-

Malcolm Collins: to physically remove

Simone Collins: him,

Malcolm Collins: yes, from their property, right? Mm. A- Anthony pulls out a folding knife and stabbed Metcalf in the chest, then fled. Metcalf died from the wound. But note, note, Anthony did say, “Is he okay?” at some point after fleeing. So- Oh ... he, he’s capable of experiencing s- s- remorse that something may happen to him?

Like, I [00:15:00] can’t even... I cannot believe- Mm ... like, the one Black lady who’s like, “He, he said that.

Well, you don’t know that he’s not just interested in his own...” Like, they, they... It shows that she thinks that if you are Black and you kill a white person and you express remorse- You feel bad

Simone Collins: about it. ...

Malcolm Collins: That you shouldn’t be punished Which is astonishing.

It w- the court case was so bad and biased that there was apparently a moment when the jury gasped- Ooh ... because the person defending the guy tried to suggest that the guy stabbed himself accidentally while pushing him out of the tent.

Simone Collins: Oh, that, that the victim stabbed him- Yeah. The public defender tried to argue that?

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I, I mean, I love that, like, the courtroom actually gasped upon hearing this.

Simone Collins: Mm.

Malcolm Collins: Now, as to why everybody considers this such an open-and-shut case for self-defense law, which is what they tried to say, which is the wildest thing ever. You can’t go onto somebody else’s property and then claim self-defense when they’ve repeatedly [00:16:00] asked you to leave.

Simone Collins: Oh, isn’t that kinda how states that don’t have stand-your-ground... A- actually, isn’t that even kinda how stand-your-ground rules-

Malcolm Collins: This, this was a stand-your-ground state.

Simone Collins: Oh, okay.

Malcolm Collins: So for a stand-your-ground state, a reasonable belief of imminent unlawful force or deadly harm, which obviously wasn’t the case here.

Yeah. The response must be proportional and involve provocation by defender. Obviously the court clearly- So they

Simone Collins: should each be trying to pick each other up here.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah.

Simone Collins: Yeah, okay.

Malcolm Collins: No duty to retreat from some situations, but you can’t escalate or bring a weapon into a minor dispute. Again, like, he fails at literally every level of what you need for a stand-your-ground law to, to work.

Anthony , had the knife ready and issued a threat. Like, he basically brought a knife and issued a threat, right? Like, you can’t do that with stand your ground. Witnesses said he reached into his bag and warned, “Touch me and see what happens,” before physical contact.

This looks like premeditated escalation rather than pure reaction. He didn’t just happen to have the pocketknife with him. A pole is not a deadly threat. And we have multiple consistent with [00:17:00] witnesses.

So to go over some other cases that have looked like this where we sort of see the opposite reaction of this you know, instead of, like, the person of color automatically you know, having to face any repercussions that I think created the assumption of no repercussions.

You have Tamar, 14, from Marken, this is near Amsterdam, oh, so it was in Germany left home at night after an argument with her parents about going to bed. She was walking along a dark road. She was struck by a gray Mazda car, but her body was found dragged to the side of the road just, like, dragged into a ditch after murdered, a 14-year-old kid.

The car contained four Iraqi men one of whom was the driver. And they were seeking asylum status. In Germany with German plates. Police initially told the m- mother of the, of, of, of the girl that it was a German driver, even though they knew that it wasn’t. When asked why they had deliberately lied to the parents of a dead and grieving girl, they said, “Oh, it was we didn’t want the Wilders effect.”

That is a politician, Geert [00:18:00] Wilders. That’s like saying we don’t want to boost Trump or MAGA, like a mainstream political movement. It’s not even, like, racism. We are afraid of it helping a mainstream politician in the Netherlands, and they just never got any repercussions for doing this. You know what the Iraqis had to pay?

A single 1,500 pound euro fine now-

Simone Collins: That, that can’t be in, in like concurrence with law in Germany, right? Like, that’s not what happens. That’s not what’s supposed to happen with males. Well, it’s

Malcolm Collins: not what happens to Germans, but... And this is what I’m talking about, where it’s actually gotten to the point where the law is just being applied completely separately.

If you see our episode in the... I mean, and, and especially when you look at all of this and then you look at, at instances where the law is, you know, protecting rich white people. Oh, oh, they’re fine. Like, look at the bricks and minifigs situation, right? You know? But when you look at the, the way that it’s being applied to like average people.

When we had the case of you know, the guy trying to defend someone [00:19:00] on the subway and ends up killing the guy, right? And everyone was just like, “How could you do that? How could you defend yourself? You’re just supposed to lie down and take it.” And what I want to sort of go through in this episode is just sort of normalize how far we’ve come as a society.

That you are just supposed to let yourself be stabbed at this point. And th- this is what some communities have normalized to. And it’s leading to really bad action in mass. You know, we have instances, like during the Black Lives Matter protests, that we now know that people were burned alive in that protest, right?

You know, bodies have been found in, in some of the stories. I, I know at least one, I think more than one.

Speaker 23: Yeah, , a man, , Oscar Lee Stewart, had his store looted and was locked inside, and it was deliberately lit on fire, and he was burned alive. , And so i-if, if you didn’t hear about this, this, this is huge. 19 to 25 people were killed in the riots. N- nobody talks about it. Nobody cares about it. It’s insane

Malcolm Collins: You know, they, they... we... And this wasn’t widely report- like, this wasn’t something that [00:20:00] the progressive media covered, right? Like we- Yeah,

Simone Collins: this is my first time hearing about that. That’s terrifying.

Malcolm Collins: We have allowed society to enter a degree of just pure degeneracy that cannot be allowed to stand. And in Europe, there’s not even really parties attempting to fight this in a big way. Like, w- when you talk about the mainstream, like the Wilder party or Reform in the UK or the AFD, these keep being called fringe movements.

They frame centrist rightism, like the AFD run by a lesbian in an interracial marriage with kids you know, as a, a, a far-right party is, is, is comical. They, they’re like, “Well, they’re far right because they want to get rid of immigrants.” And it’s like, how could you not want to get rid of immigrants if this is the case?

If they’re making up... In some of these countries, I’ll, I’ll read after this, but I think it’s like 80% of rapes in some of these countries, right?

Speaker 24: A Lund University 21-year study showed that of grape convictions, only 37% had Swedish parents. If you look [00:21:00] at a country like Germany, despite being only 10% of the population, immigrants account for 40% of SAs. And we see this all over the place throughout Europe. It’s just horrible.

Malcolm Collins: You know, and we do need to, in the United States, even with the Native American Black population you know, we do need to get more realistic in how we’re having these conversations.

They make up a rate of homicides that 6x their population, right? They-

Simone Collins: Yeah, so if you look... Like, this is something people are discussing a lot in this discourse. Like, especially for this one 2024 Department of Justice report that gives counts on percentages of violent incidents by the race- Of origin of victims and offenders based on, based on victims’ perceptions, so that’s a caveat there.

But it reports 57,370 white-on-black incidents, but then 536,120 black-on-white incidents. [00:22:00] That is-

Malcolm Collins: And did you see the rates? The rate stats were almost comical when they came out. Mm-hmm. Where it showed that there wasn’t, in the year of recording, a single instance of white-on-black rape in the United States during that year.

This was the National Crime Victimization Survey, a mainstream nonpartisan crime survey

Malcolm Collins: I’m gonna find those statistics to read them, because it’s just, it, that’s where it just gets comical, right? Like, oh, so this is really a unidirectional violence that we’re dealing with here.

Simone Collins: But I also, I, rather than, I, I wanna make sure that we don’t just straw man the other side while you’re looking at those stats.

Malcolm Collins: Well, no, hold on. If you look at- So- This is, this is from Penn, an Ivy League university in the United States. There was also a Harvard study that showed this, but I’ll just go into the Penn one. Mm-hmm. Regardless of socioeconomic status, Black communities face higher gun homicides. Well, and it

Simone Collins: says- Yeah.

And to be clear, like 60, in the 60s for both whites and Blacks and, and other groups, 60%-ish, or, like between 60% and 70% are, of crimes are race-on-race. Like white-on-white, Black-on-Black. Like the crimes are, are typically [00:23:00] concentrated in your own group.

Malcolm Collins: Right. But the point I’m making here is that these are higher rates even when you’re...

So you can’t be like, “Oh, it’s because of historic discrimination,” or something like that. It, it is- No ... because of... And, and why not? If, if you are a Black person and you’re growing up, like, and you see everyone in your community being like, “Of course a kid shouldn’t go to jail for stabbing a kid when he was asked to be re- like multiple times to be removed from the property and they had to eventually physically remove him.

That’s a totally normal thing for someone of our community to do.” When they act with shock at this they, they then for young Black kids, they grow up and they think, “This is a type of thing I do. This is a type of thing that’s normal for me to do.”

Speaker 15: Webster defines a

Speaker 15: moment as a moment when ignorance overwhelms the mind of an otherwise logical

Speaker 15: male.

Speaker 14: What did you say, b***h ?

Speaker 14: Hey, squeeze it, .

Speaker 15: Causing him to act in an illogical, [00:24:00] self-destructive manner, i.e.,

like a .

Speaker 15: But they all end up bad. If they had their own category,

Speaker 15: moments would be the third leading killer of Black men behind pork chops and FEMA. It’s a fact.

Every

Speaker 15: moment begins with a .

Speaker 15: Without that key element, all you’re left with is peace and quiet

Malcolm Collins: And it’s, it’s true within the immigrant community, it’s true within these, these Sikh communities with these Muslim communities that are immigrating into these countries.

When they see these communities have these protests about like, “We should be able to do this,” which we’ve actually seen counter-protests. When people have gone out there to protest, like the, the guy the, we’ll talk about this case now. The white kid who was stabbed and then the, the Sikh kid’s family tried to hide the wea- the weapon.

His mom hid the wea- weapon. His, his brothers were complicit in this. The police believed him even though he told them multiple times, “I, I’ve been stabbed, I’m dying.” And we now see these anti-discrimination procedures that they have to go through, [00:25:00] and what the anti-discrimination procedures basically say is you need to always presume the white person is at fault.

Well, it

Simone Collins: would explain why what happened happened. I, I don’t know if you’ve seen footage from that particular incident, but like Yeah, it, it, it does kind of feel like they’re acting on procedure of like... That, plus also it genuinely seemed like they didn’t believe the white kid. Like, they were like, “Yeah, sure you have been.”

Like, “I don’t see anything.” Like, whining.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, well, I mean, police in the UK are awful, generally speaking. Like my- I haven’t

Simone Collins: had any encounters with them, so I don’t know.

Malcolm Collins: My experience is they’re like, well this is what happens when you take away their guns and you put them in the far left environment of the UK, is they begin to act like ultra Karens.

Simone Collins: Well, I wouldn’t wanna be a police officer in the UK. I mean, to be a police officer without a gun, I’d be terrified. Yeah. But what, it, it is, like that is, I think in terms of the, the social media posts that were made online that I’ve seen, the worst are around that case. Like, this one guy on X posted, “The Sikh man and his family are not walking around looking to [00:26:00] stab people.

Henry Nowak was a drunk racist abusing the Punjabi and got what he deserved. The police correctly identified the drunk aggressor and just didn’t realize he was stabbed.” Like, that is not

Malcolm Collins: good. This, again, what I’m saying here is they genuinely... We need to move, because I think it can sound like people are being hyperbolic.

And I, and I wanna go through some articles where, where people talk about, like, the, they’re so concerned about the rise in reportings of these crimes. And like, The Guardian of course has a piece, panicked that these crimes are being reported at higher rates now. And we need to go from the they want you dead isn’t hyperbolic.

It’s what they when, every time they cheer when they say... Because historically this is how it started. It’s like, oh, the number of you know, whites will no longer be a majority in the country. White populations are going down. And you would see at leftist rallies they would cheer. This really happened, right?

We would see them cheer. Eh, that means, [00:27:00] oh, this is exciting for us. Like, we are getting rid of this population. H- A, a generation raised singing that and normalizing for that is of course not going to mind as much when they see white people being killed, and is going to react absolutely in panic when they see white people defending themselves, which is what we repeatedly see.

Of a continuous post here.

Simone Collins: So an- another response that’s really common with, like, this specific Si- Sikh stabbing incident is, “Sikhs are fighting back. Unprecedented moves.” This is from Baakara Amri. “Innocent Sikhs have been targeted while the elderly and vulnerable are being urged to stay indoors following the sentencing of Bikram Dhingra.

Amrit Singh from Hounslow and Mas- “west London has launched a website for Sikhs across the country to report incidents of hate crime. The site has received numerous reports in the past five days, with many respondents believing the abuse they experienced was linked to Dhingra’s conviction.

‘Will you report any anti-Sikhs crimes?’ The British Sikhs 2025 [00:28:00] report found 40 thou- 49% of British Sikhs were already worried about rising anti-Sikh sentiment. Many reported being mistaken for Muslims or targeted simply for wearing a turban, according to the report. Here is the reason why. Far-right mobilization.”

So what, what... And this is a really common pattern across most of these incidents, which is instead of respond to the actual crime or to condemn the actual aggressors- Mm-hmm. Yeah ... in these crimes, they’re like, “You know what? This is just the right trying to use this to radicalize people.” And instead of having a real conversation about what’s going on of, like, this is not acceptable.

We have to punish these people. They cannot be lenient punishments. We need to reconsider deportations. We need to reconsider immigration. Instead it’s like, “No, no, no. You’re just, you’re just hating on people.” And that, I think, is where I feel like the conversation is just people screaming across the bow to each other, is that there has, from what I can tell, actually been a policing double [00:29:00] standard in favor of white populations in majority white countries, and to the disfavor of non-whites.

Like per organizations like The Sentencing Project, evidence from policing and sentencing and media coverage shows a true racial double standards, at least historically, have existed. They just happen to be, you know, a- against, you know, the favor of-

Malcolm Collins: Well, I mean, we can, we can... So one-

Simone Collins: I think what’s happening, though, what I’m trying to say- We know that this happened-

is maybe right now people are over-correcting for hysteric- sorry, historical favoritism toward white people, historical bias, and they’re going too far. And now what needs to happen is a market correction. But one side, the progressives, people on the left, are just so, like, stuck in the there is discrimination.

There is discrimination that they can’t see that maybe they’ve over-corrected at this point. And then on the right, they’re just so angry that the left isn’t even listening to them that they’re getting more and more extreme and shouting louder and louder.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, and that, the entire point I’m making is I think that that is the [00:30:00] wrong takeaway from all of this.

Simone Collins: Really? Okay.

Malcolm Collins: Yes. Yes. I think that for a long time that has been my position. My position has been this is just marginal over-correction. But when I look at the posts and the people, when I look at how incensed they were that Anthony was charged, when I look at them saying, “Oh, it’s good that the Sikh killed this kid in the street and that the police let him die,” what I’m seeing, when you see mainstream figures, not just online crazies, like Cardi B saying that this is disgusting, that, you know, justice was carried out, what we are seeing here is a m- a large part of the left, and especially these minority communities, genuinely believe that The law should not apply to their communities.

They, they, they, their communities should be allowed to kill this other group with impunity because this other group is so beneath them, so beneath in, in the long for- This is why we [00:31:00] saw, and I think we should have assumed this, when we saw the people having the parties for the October 11th attacks, you know, before the IDF did anything in response or anything like that, on college campuses around the United States they really believe, and watch our video on Zoran Mandani where we break the psychology and politics of this that the world exists in two classes: the oppressor and the oppressed.

And anyone who’s in oppressed class, even if they functionally have societal power which they do today if they’re in the oppressed class, they can do anything they want to the oppressor, and it is never immoral. So when they go and, you know, Hamas is dragging girls away from a peace protest, right, which was what it was, the big concert that they had, and gang raping them and murdering them in horrific ways, this isn’t bad because girl was of oppressor class, the other side was of the oppressed class.

And I think that this is hidden from a lot of, a lot of people under the mindset that you are going right now, which is just [00:32:00] like, “Oh, we over-corrected.” This isn’t over-corrected. This is cheering when people are brutally graped or murdered and things alike, like the police actively lying to a girl’s parents about the ethnicity of who just killed a 14-year-old girl.

That isn’t like,

Simone Collins: Yeah, no, that, that is, that is something that’s atrocious That’s

Malcolm Collins: like the height of like Jim Crow South and stuff like that when I went through-

Simone Collins: Yeah, oh, and also correction, I completely mixed up in my head Nicki Minaj and Cardi B. Cardi B is very anti-Trump. Nicki Minaj is the person who, like, showed up s- with some support for Trump, and people on the left defenestrated her for that, of course.

So it’s Nicki Minaj who’s being boycotted.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, when you have something like a teenage girl being gang graped in the woods and, and, and no one is sent to jail for this.

Simone Collins: I mean, to be fair, they were like age 11 to 16, so it might just be about like minor offenses, but I think there are plenty of cases- That’s not a

Octavian Collins: minor offense.

Simone Collins: No, no, no, but [00:33:00] they are minors, and they are offe- They murdered a girl. They are a threat. I n- Malcolm, they are minors. They are below the age of 18. Yeah, I

Malcolm Collins: know. They should still go to jail. They’re clearly a threat to their community.

Simone Collins: Right. I mean, there are certainly exceptions in which minors are tried as adults.

I just don’t know

Malcolm Collins: You don’t need to be tried as adult. There’s prisons for minors. What are you talking about?

Simone Collins: Oh, well, I, I mean, who knows how it works in other countries. I, I mean-

Malcolm Collins: No, you can go to jail as a minor. There,

Simone Collins: there’s entire prison- They’re extremely

Malcolm Collins: lenient in many European countries And you don’t get to just murder or grape someone because you’re a minor.

And the mindset it shows to not only video... This is what I’m talking about when I say

Simone Collins: they think about- No, it’s so sick, and it’s, it’s truly sick. It’s, it’s, it’s horrific. It, yeah ... to video it,

Malcolm Collins: put it on Snapchat. To do that shows you don’t believe you’re going to be punished.

Simone Collins: Yeah, they, they, they expected some level of impunity, and they got it.

And- I mean, like, they weren’t wrong to do that ... and then they got it. Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: This is the thing that’s changing. When you’re like, “It’s a m- it’s a minor change”- Yeah,

Simone Collins: I guess if we live in a society in which young [00:34:00] teens believe that they can do such a thing, post it to Snapchat, and, and not be that at high risk and actually get caught, and then only get 30 hours community service shows how bad it is, I guess.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And I think that w- I think the wrong takeaway from this, right? Which I think some of the right is going to have, is that this means that we need to exclude all members of these communities from our faction. And that, that is a huge mistake, because you don’t have enough white people to win elections.

The, in, in, in fact, a lot of this mindset, while it is prevalent in some of these minority communities, is coming downstream of, of white women. Okay? You don’t have the votes to win if you try to take a racialist perspective, like, say, a Nick Fuentes does. If you want to win, you need to get on our team- P- people who want their group to behave respectably and want their [00:35:00] group to be held accountable.

That, that, once you get that, then, then it works. It’s okay. Bring them over, right? But that’s the world we need to move to if, if we’re gonna win, realistically. And then with everyone else, I think we need to get dramatically harsher. And I think that we are seeing a model of the way that the West or the United States at least, should reorient the way it sees people who...

And, and, and groups that are acting bad. I think Israel is sort of modeling the direction we need to go. And I think that that’s one reason why they make such a natural and strong ally right now, is some people are like, “Well, you know, Jews see themselves as a distinct group,” and yes, they have, you know...

I can go to Israel and have a great life. Like I’ve, I’ve, I’ve been to Israel before. It’s a really nice place. You don’t face... At, at least when I was there, I never got any sense of any discrimination. It’s not that there aren’t parts of Israel you can’t go where you will face discrimination but that’s true of anywhere, right?

You know, there are white communities where you’ll face discrimination in the United States. There’s Black [00:36:00] communities where you’ll face discrimination in the United States. But the, the overall, they’ve created a multi-ethnic society in Israel and a multicultural society. But it is still a society where there is a, a ethnic identity and cultural identity and religious identity sort of recognized.

And I think that that is the direction that we can go in the United States that will be sane. And we actually see, like a lot of people can think, “Oh, you’re not gonna peel off, you know, Black voters.” We actually have a significant Black fan base, first of all, for people who are unaware of that. And in addition to that when the left tries to do all these crazy things like de- go, defund the police and stuff like this, on average Black people, when I talk about like wh- whites don’t have enough money not enough votes to win on their own on average, Black voters were more anti-defund the police than the average white voter.

Note here, I’m not talking about like Republican white voters. I’m talking about the average white voter. That means you can peel off people easier [00:37:00] from the Black side than the white side on this particular issue. And the a- answer is, is because when you recognize, oh, this community is more violent, because as Simone said, they are disproportionately the subject of that violence And you say, “Okay, this means we need to act in a different way when engaging with this community,” the, the, the, the people who benefit from that the most are the people from that community.

That’s why Blacks didn’t want the police defunded, right? Like, a- and if you, if you look at... Well, I mean, you’ve, you’ve obviously got different portions of these communities, but the Blacks who still have healthy families and are having lots of kids are, from what I’ve seen, universally in this conservative camp.

It is, a- a- and note, there are a lot of, you know, raised without dad stuff in the Black community. The, the rate is astonishingly high. But I don’t think that that is going to continue to be a problem going [00:38:00] forwards, because we’ve seen the Black fertility rate drop below the white fertility rate in the United States.

If you’re not aware of that, that, that happened. Not controlling for income, just raw numbers dropped below the white fertility rate. I, I remember when I mentioned that on the stream, people were, like, confused. They thought it was like... Watch our episode on it. Like, we go over all the data. Like, like, if you look at native-born Blacks, they have a desperately low fertility rate in the United States.

Most of the Black fertility rate is pumped up by immigrants. Native Blacks mainly have a fertility rate of, like, 1.3 at this point. And so, what, what basically what I’m saying is this is a community we can eventually get on team.

Speaker 22: Reverend Jordan Wells. I’m a Black man, proud conservative, and a follower of Jesus Christ. When I see protesters outside the Collin County Courthouse chanting, “F**k white lives,” after Karmelo Anthony’s sentencing for murdering Austin Metcalf, my soul grieves. This isn’t justice. This isn’t community. This is a demonic hatred, plain and simple.

All lives are made in the image of God, every single one, Black, white, brown, doesn’t matter. Celebrating the loss... This is, this is [00:39:00] true. Celebrating the loss of any innocent life or cheering on evil because of skin color is straight from the pit of hell. And here’s the truth they don’t want to say out loud.

When Black conservatives, Christians, or truth tellers like me call this out, we get labeled as traitors, Uncle Toms, or betrayers of the community. It’s true. Let them talk. I’d rather be disliked by some in my own community than stand before a holy God and be found guilty of excusing evil, hating my neighbor, or twisting justice for racial points.

My allegiance is to Christ first, not color, not tribe, not political pressure. Woe to those who call evil g- good and good evil, Isaiah 5:20. I ch- I choose truth over tribe, light over darkness, God over man. Who else is tired of the hate? Drop a prayer hands if you stand for real justice, not skin color

Malcolm Collins: You know, reacting with hostility to everyone in the community.

But when it comes to the people who are doing things like protesting the Anthony ver- verdict or stuff like that, you know, the people [00:40:00] who we see, you know, the Cardi B’s and stuff like that, the level of anonymity we need to have to these people should be as if, you know, th- like, like they have genocidal intentions.

The people who cheer when the white population is falling, they’re doing that because they want to get rid of this population. In every other context we call that genocide, and they have violent genocidal intentions. And that’s the way we need to reframe how we see who we are up against. We need to be the side of true and genuine diverse groups working together to win and preserve civilization against the racist spastics.

And the left has become the team of racists. I mean, you’ve got Nick Fuentes on the left now saying he’s a moderate Democrat, voting leftists since forever. You’ve got the Islamists there. You’ve got the, the the gay extremists there. Watching the Islamists and the gays fight over pride was hilarious.

But the point being is every one of the mainstream racist factions, like David Duke went to the left, right? Like the, the, the head of the KKK [00:41:00] went to the left, right? Every one of the major racist factions in the United States has naturally drifted to the left because the left has become a coalition of supremacist groups that are simply living in denial about the fact that they’re not at the top of that particular coalition, or that think that once they knock society down, their side will rise from the ashes.

And th- this is what we’re seeing. Like, obviously the gays know that the Islamists want them, you know... I think it’s, what? 35% of American Muslims, and these are the ones who are having the majority of kids in Muslim communities, want Sharia law. Like, that’s literally want them dead. That’s not like a, a figurative thing or something like that.

But they, they are aware of this. And same, like Nick Fuentes is aware of this as well, right? Like David Duke’s aware of this as well. But they just think that, oh, well, once they knock things down, once they, they, they don’t wanna be in a faction that allows Indians in. They don’t wanna be in a faction that allows Jews in when they’re willing to play ball, right?

But we need those groups to win, right? D- even [00:42:00] just, like outside of the morality of this and everything like that, we need them to win because the right is the side of the honest conversation. And if the honest conversation says w- we are going to create a society where you are treated, you know, in, in, in a way that is demonstrably unfair or something like that then they’re gonna be like, “Well, I don’t, I don’t wanna be a part of that coalition,” right?

Whereas the left, they can have these conversations where one minute they say something Islamist and the next minute they go to Pride, right? Because it, there’s no inter- it doesn’t matter whether they’re being logical or, or not. But as long as we are the logical conversation, we can’t play that game, and we need to push back against people who are performatively racist not to show

Because there’s, like, the jokey performative racism, which a, a lot of people on the right do to sort of show in group where they’re not truly being spiteful about a group, right? But they’re saying something that’s edgy, and so you know, “Okay, yeah, he’s one of us,” right? Like I can, I can take [00:43:00] what he’s saying seriously.

An, an example of this, Leaflet actually had a really funny joke, is she was looking at all the protesters outside the Anthony trial, and she said that she should start a stand for you know, that juice-soaked pineapple trend. Have you not seen the juice-soaked pineapple trend?

Simone Collins: I heard there’s something about pineapples and Kool-Aid and the CIA that’s floating about the internet, but not this.

Black people

Malcolm Collins: apparently, like, invented this thing where they sort of pickle a pineapple in heavily sugared juice.

And it’s an extremely high calorie thing, and there’s videos of, like, fat Black woman eating it, and then Asmongold tried it, and he said it’s disgusting. But it’s become, like, the, the joke, the Black thing, right?

And, and so she said that’s not genuinely being mean to that group or anything like that. It’s just being edgy. Like- It’s like the, I don’t know, the, the w- w- with the watermelons of our generation or something like that. Oh. Or the fried chicken of our generation. It’s like,

Simone Collins: if you- Well, isn’t it kind of like making fun of [00:44:00] a basic white b***h for liking pumpkin spice lattes?

Malcolm Collins: Yes. It’s exactly like a, a basic white b***h l- And, and it’s so weird that for a while in our society you could say, “Oh, pumpkin spice latte,” like, as a joke about white women, right? And everyone would laugh. And you say fried chicken, why, why, why is that a problem to say? Like, fried chicken’s a tasty thing, right?

Like, it’s not like- Really good ... disparaging a community to say that they like fried chicken. It’s not like saying they like

Simone Collins: being- It’s a testament to good taste. Now all I want is Wing Bucket. No.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, like if, if, if, if you were talking about, like, okay, maybe if you say that, like, Indians smell like curry or something.

I mean, I generally think curry smells good, but, like, I could see that being disparaging. But saying you like fried chicken is just like- Saying you have to- Duh ... is disproportionately true in the community. It’s like a known- Yeah ... bla, bla, bla. But we as- Yeah, yeah, yeah ... a society just, like, acted like, “Oh my God, you can’t do that,” which shows one thing- Yeah, I

Simone Collins: guess it’s-

exactly ... maybe there’s an episode in that on its own. I’d kind of like to explore, [00:45:00] like, why kind of teasing a, a racial, national, or ethnic group about food sometimes is okay and sometimes not. Like, if someone’s like, “Oh, those natto-eating Japanese,” like, I don’t really know anyone who eats natto who’s not Japanese.

And it’s really- What the heck is natto? I think it’s really gross. Most people, even, like, a lot of Japanese people think it’s really gross, but, like, talking about it isn’t gonna make it get me in trouble, whereas, like- What is natto? Natto is a very, very healthy but kinda st- like, really, like, mucusy fermented soybean.

Really good for you, like incredibly healthy food. But-

Malcolm Collins: Okay ...

Simone Collins: yeah, I’m, I’m not for it

Malcolm Collins: Are you workshop slurs here? Natto eaters, is that too much of a-

Simone Collins: Na- natto, N-A-T-T-O, natto. People

Malcolm Collins: aren’t even gonna be able to pronounce this. This is ridiculous. You’re- Well, anyway- You’re

Simone Collins: not even- I, I don’t get it.

Like, it’s, it’s one of those things of, like, can, can you not? Like, like, I know that... Like, I stayed with a Japanese family once where, like, one, one family member would eat it every morning for breakfast. He was a doctor. He knew how good it was for you, and it’s like a [00:46:00] very traditional Japanese, like, breakfast food over rice.

And, like, the rest of the family was like, “That’s nasty.” But, like, but but then I’m sure there are lots of people per this, like, pineapple dish you’re describing, within communities where it’s popular who are like, “That’s nasty.” And I think that there are lots of people in the white community who are like, “I am not ever going to touch a pumpkin spice latte.

I, I am, I’m a purist. I only drink espresso from the specially sourced coffee bean.” Right? Like- Right ... why is it weird to... Anyway, we’re getting off topic. Well, because it’s weird because

Malcolm Collins: we created a racial caste system. That is what happened. It was a caste system where different social norms applied to different groups.

This is historically what we called racism where one group had specific social norms around their behavior that was expected to be followed, and they got, they, they got used to it being the case that they couldn’t be criticized as a group.

Simone Collins: Oh, Germans and krauts. So there, there was that against white people, and doughboys.

Well,

Malcolm Collins: potato [00:47:00] eaters, you know,

Simone Collins: I don’t... Was potato eaters this? I’ve never heard potato eaters. I’ve heard krauts. I’ve heard doughboys. This is for the Irish Well, yeah, but I’ve never heard someone say that. I’ve heard people say krauts. I’ve heard people say-

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, but it, th- those terms are horrible.

But the point being is imagine when you’re trying to understand how somebody could, like, be like, “Oh, it’s disgusting that this person was tried for a crime they obviously committed,” right? How you end up with that mindset is you first have to live a life where your group is never responsible for the things it does, and this is genuinely the world they lived in.

When you could not talk about Black crime statistics without being yelled at for being a racist, that means that they grew up without hearing that at equivalent rates of incomes, Black have significantly higher rates of homicides, right? Like a, a, a per- when... Because that wasn’t part of the conversation, it warped their brains.

Because they grew up seeing, like, “Oh, I can just Snapchat myself graping someone, and I get off scot-free,” right? Like, it warped their perception, and it’s funny that the left [00:48:00] n- normalize this term, but when you grow up with privilege being treated equally feels like persecution. And we as a society, even on the right, even you, a sane person, I think didn’t realize how much privilege many of these people grew up with.

The feeling that whenever they are... And we see this in our society. Whenever they you know, suppose they, like, run a scam on a place and they get caught. Now all of a sudden they can scream racism, right? You know, with, with, with bricks and minifigs being like, “Oh, this is anti-Mormon bigotry,” right?

You know, getting so used to claiming this group status means that you personally, maybe your entire life, never really felt what responsibility feels like because it was always the other person’s fault because you were always taught to make it the other person’s fault. And that allowed you to violently escalate like this.

And I think that we, like, when you talk about how do you, and every, every, [00:49:00] I think, like, Black person or a Muslim who actually cares about the future of their communities. Well, Muslims are a bit different because they have a different long-term goal, but Black person at least in the United States. When they think about how they wanna fix their community, they know step one is responsibility.

Like, when they’re being... Because you can’t begin to teach anything else until you can teach responsibility. And if you watch older Black content, this was the core thing that they were trying to teach. They were like, “This is the direction we need to go as a people.” And it was something that was even core to Black culture, as we point out.

In the 1950s, Blacks had half the rate of out-of-wedlock births that the white population had. But anyway, thoughts, Simona. Am I, am I going too far here?

Simone Collins: I still feel like there’s something missing in the discourse. Like, there’s something missing in How, like what, these people who are posting like, “Well [00:50:00] good, I’m glad that this person did this.”

‘Cause what, what they’re saying is, I think what I worry about is that we’re just seeing an increased escalation where it’s like a Chinese finger trap, right? Where like one side is like really, really mad and then the other side starts pulling away too, and then like we just keep doing this and it gets tighter.

No, no,

Malcolm Collins: no, no, no, no, no, no. You’re completely misinterpreting what you, what, what you’re seeing. What you saw was one side that secretly had really, really atrocious, abhorrent, evil perspectives, opinions, and goals, but that didn’t publicly voice it. And the other side now being like, “Wait, you’re not actually saying it’s okay to just stab a white kid, right?

Like, and it’s, you don’t actually think he should face... You don’t actually think that you should be able to kill a white girl then have the police cover for you, right?” And the other side being like, “No, that is our position.” And you hearing them say, “No, that is our position,” [00:51:00] your confusion comes from the fact that you feel like they have reactively backed into this position when that’s not what happened.

This is just their revealed preferences for a long time finally being forced to be put on the table

That’s, that’s... And I, I think if you think about these positions, if you look at the writings of Dorhan Montani, the way they talk about colonizers versus colonized the way that they, they talk about any of this, right? Like you even talked to me about this where you, there’s this phenomenon of white progressive women feeling like they have to go ask people for permission to have children ‘cause they do not want to accidentally increase the white population, right?

Like, that is an, a racial underclass when you’re at that, that point. And I think that we as a society overly tried to think of them as just sort of like a more extreme position of like whatever Democrats were in the ‘90s or whatever, and that’s not what we’re seeing here, okay? We’re seeing a political ideology [00:52:00] that needs to be responded to with, I think, a level of force that we in the United States are not used to needing to use.

But it, it-

Simone Collins: So explicitly then, what is your proposed solution?

Malcolm Collins: As I’ve said, I think the politics of right-wing I- Israel is the politics the right-wing United States needs to move towards. I think that that is the, the realistic... Like basically a lot of people are gonna have to be deported. A lot of people are gonna have to be deported, and it’s not gonna look nice.

But we need to stop sympathizing with obvious bad actors and understand that the enablers of the bad actors are as bad as the bad actors themselves because they prevent punishment from being handed out. If you’re the person who lets go of the grapist, right, like the gang grapist and then they go out and do that to somebody else, you’re as responsible as they are for that, and we need [00:53:00] to be applying that responsibility throughout society.

To people like Cardi B, to people like the people who are tweeting this, to The Guardian, to these leftist organizations and politicians. While ensuring that we do not normalize an environment where people of different backgrounds do not feel comfortable because they can help us, right? They can be our biggest enforcers.

And the, you know, the Sikhs, like, yeah, we, yeah, we need to get rid of the bad actors in the Sikh community. We need to get rid of these immigrants who are coming here, taking all the... That’s a person who you can get to vote for you, and now you can win, you can win elections, right? Or you can have run on your side and win an election, right?

Like, I know you may not like it. You may have to hold your nose now that you’ve developed some sort of like racial consciousness, but your racial conscious ideals will never win in an environment where you act as an eth- an a, an antagonistic ethno-nationalist rather than a team [00:54:00] player.

Simone Collins: Yikes.

Malcolm Collins: And I feel strongly about this ‘cause we can never do anything about the bad actors as long as we enable the bad actors on our side that prevent us from winning the big tent.

Simone Collins: Yeah. Yeah, no, that’s true because, well, they’re, they’re the primary blocker of genuinely moving forward as long as they, they get to, like, represent the movement or become, at least be accused of being a face of it even if they’re not.

‘Cause that’s the, I think the big problem is all these people on the left are refusing to even engage with any critical thinking because a single person who is genuinely racist is showing up in the protests, right? And then, like, that, the presence of that one person- And

Malcolm Collins: that allows them... Th- I mean, think about what the left’s saying.

They say if one racist person comes, we can just kill them. Yeah,

Simone Collins: it renders everyone else’s opinions entirely moot. They, they don’t count. But remember,

Malcolm Collins: it’s that it renders everyone else, because they say, you know, kill a [00:55:00] Nazi, right? E- everyone else now, because anyone who goes into a room with a Nazi is a Nazi, as they say.

So if one bad actor shows up at a protest, and remember they’re considered, like, just MAGA Nazis at this point which is more than 50% of the American population they, they consider everyone there a target to be murdered, right? Like, as we’ve seen from their repost. And I think that we on the right just need to wake up and realize that.

They’re not just saying it. It is, it is, they’re doing it, right? Like, it’s, it’s, it’s, it, th- they’re cheering for it. You have to stand up in a way that can allow you to win. Yeah. And the way that... And that’s the other thing. I just get so angry. I have as much anger at an individual like Nick Fuentes as I do against one of these people because he is functionally protecting them through his politics.

And I think you should view him with as much disgust as somebody like Cardi B.

Simone Collins: Does he express racist,

Malcolm Collins: like- He won’t build partnerships with, like, Indians or [00:56:00] people in interracial relationships like JD Vance.

Simone Collins: You know? Oh, right, I forgot. Right, even that was too far for him.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, so- Okay ... you’re never gonna win.

You’re never gonna win in the United States with those views. So it’s stupid and it prevents us from actually creating an accountable country Anyway Love you. Hopefully I- This is depressing because I

Simone Collins: don’t see this resolving anytime soon.

Malcolm Collins: I love we had a, w- I’ve been posting instead of just the boring gear, I was like, “Oh, let’s post some RFAB images,” right?

And I’ve been posting images of my wife, and somebody thought they were a sexualized Catholic nun, and I’m

Simone Collins: like- Two, two people thought that they were nuns and as- Did you respond

Malcolm Collins: to them?

Simone Collins: I did. Th- that is disappointing because nuns and Puritans do not dress the same at all. Like, there’s a very big difference between a habit and a bonnet, but-

Malcolm Collins: No, a habit and a bonnet look nothing alike.

Your outfit looks nothing

Simone Collins: like a nun. Well, there, there are many different types of habits with different forms of cowls or no [00:57:00] cowls, and some, some habits I know of some orders do look quite minimal, but they never look like bonnets, but I don’t know. I mean, what are you gonna do? Yeah,

Malcolm Collins: you can tell by your outfit.

It had a clear Protestant church behind it in multiple of the images, right? You know, a, y- your, your outfit is incredibly distinct. You dress like a medieval woman. Which by the way, we want to make more of a thing. When I learned that Leaflet in real life dresses this way, and, like, a bunch of other people dress this way-

Simone Collins: Yeah, it seems like other people in the, the base camp world also have wives who dress this way.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, we

Simone Collins: need to make this, like, the, the conservative womanly- Or themselves dress this way ...

Malcolm Collins: way of dressing going forward. I, it’s fun. I like it. It’s you know, it’s, it, it’s cool and aspirational, and doesn’t, like, try hard to, like- Try hard ... be a goth or something like that.

Simone Collins: Well, the argument I was making to Malcolm is that it’s I think there’s this point of peak enshittification of modern clothing.

At which people are going to have to just have this reckoning of either they are going to admit that they’re wearing the equivalent of hospital gowns, of, like, just Kleenex that’s going to fall apart after a couple wears that they have to keep rebuying or [00:58:00] they’re going to declare bankruptcy and, and take a totally different approach to clothing.

And one of those approaches is just to go back and, like, you know, I’m just gonna wear a chemise and a skirt and cinch it in with stays or a girdle or a belt. And, like, that works, because it, it fits all sizes. It changes as your size fluctuates. It’s great in all weathers. It’s just so useful.

Especially if you get more durable natural fiber fabrics of higher quality. So let’s make it a thing. Yes.

Malcolm Collins: I love it and agree, but yeah, I, I, I, I was, like, personally offended that they watch you every day and they, th- that wasn’t immediately... She has big circular glasses, a Puritan outfit, and wears a bonnet, which Simone wears on occasion.

Anyway, the... But I wanted to, the reason I’m posting her, by the way, is I’m like, “Look, we on the right can be cool and sexy and alluring. That’s not the same as being promiscuous.”

Simone Collins: Maybe not. I don’t think everyone-

Malcolm Collins: No ...

Simone Collins: thinks that deranged looking Puritan woman is cool and sexy. [00:59:00]

Malcolm Collins: I, I think fun anime girls is, is part of how we win this.

AI anime girls is a weapon the left doesn’t have. So let’s have fun. Let’s be the side of the party, and stop policing everything, and stop yelling- about everything because if we make our side not fun, we’re not gonna be able to pull people over. There is a difference between degeneracy and a fully clothed long sleeve AI of your wife with a yandere face.

You know? That, that, those two things are as far apart as possible, and I think we need to reflectively not attack things that are not actually in any way immoral or bad. Getting people on board with the idea that Christianity can be fun and alluring is, is the... Even the Catholic Church made an anime girl, right?

You know? Something we should do. Anyway, have fun, Simone. Love you to death.

Simone Collins: Love you too, Malcolm Okay. Hello, Simone. You

Malcolm Collins: look beautiful today.

Simone Collins: So do you. You look sharp- Yeah ... even though I know [01:00:00] you need to sleep. Did you sleep today? Did you sleep? I did.

Malcolm Collins: I slept for like an hour and a half.

Simone Collins: Oh, yeah. I did. Yeah. Even though you, like, woke up at 2:00 AM. That’s not gonna help you. ‘Cause you stayed up later than I did, pretty sure.

I think your light was still on when I went to sleep. Ugh

Malcolm Collins: Well, there’s so much to do. I, I know- Yeah, but what happens if you, I mean, I’m

Simone Collins: dead or if you die or get dementia, like, what good are you to any of that work, right?

Malcolm Collins: Well, I’ve gotten everything I needed to done.

Simone Collins: So you’re gonna go to sleep super early tonight?

Because you were staying up way too late. You need to start chilling earlier so you can be relaxed

Malcolm Collins: and up for sleep. Well, guess what we have working on the site now, is better not safe for work image-to-image model systems.

Simone Collins: Well, thank you. That’s what I

Malcolm Collins: was killing myself over, is

Simone Collins: getting those- Now people can goon more efficiently.

Thank you.

Malcolm Collins: We need money.

Simone Collins: Yeah. Well.

Malcolm Collins: You know, and this is what people pay for, okay? The, the, that is the world we live in. Yes, Jerome ... and so if, if I can, I will make money doing that. It’s RFAB, by the way, dot AI, for people who wanna try it. The, I mean, the main thing that people use [01:01:00] it for is narrative storytelling, like a choose-your-own-adventure type story.

It’s where you can build your own narrative engine and play through them with any frontier model you want.

Simone Collins: And I primarily use it for vibe- Image ... any vibe coding I’ve ever done has been on RFAB, and then I, lots of image generation. It has such a good image generator.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah.

Simone Collins: And recipe generation now.

Malcolm Collins: And we charge a- across the board, a 50% flat margin on any model that you’re using which is, like, way less than almost any other site.

Most it’s 5X margin. It’s enormous. Well,

Simone Collins: the best thing about it is its latest video tutorials, which I don’t think you’ve brought live yet. I, I wanna be able to post them next to- No, they’re all live. Video tutorials are all- Did you upload them to the folder that I can use to post them elsewhere online, because

Malcolm Collins: they- Do you like how angry I look in them?

Simone Collins: They’re, they’re very angry tutorials. Like, he’ll be like, “Okay, and how to use our recipe tool. Actually, never mind. If you can’t figure that out yourself, you’re mentally deficient.” He’ll, like, go through steps and be like, “You know what? Just figure it out.” Like, it’s, it’s, it’s great. I agree. And they’re actually helpful.

To be clear, these [01:02:00] are very helpful. They walk you through the process. They’ve made things that I’m like, “I don’t wanna try this. I don’t know how to do it.” Like, I don’t, oh, and there’s... ‘Cause he- The VTube- ... he puts in a lot of options. It can be kind of overwhelming to look at the screen. I think the video tutorials are genuinely useful.

I just also find the delivery extremely entertaining because he’s so irritable about it. So-

Malcolm Collins: Because I have tooltips explaining

Simone Collins: this to people. I know, it’s just I’m so used to, like, very tedious tutorials. You know, it’s like, “Da-na-na, next you do this,” and here it’s, like, actually both funny and useful, so thank you.

Malcolm Collins: So yeah, on the on the, This is for the VTubers where we have the, the biggest tutorial. We also have one for ImageGen, and we have one for, Oh. What’s the other one for? We have one for the new AIDubber. That’s the one thing that doesn’t c- take a 50% margin. It’s just, it’s so expensive to dev full anime episodes.

It’s, like, 10 bucks or something. So for that reason we only take a 20% margin on that.

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Because I wanna be magnanimous or whatever.

Simone Collins: Well, you wanna be practical. I mean, anime [01:03:00] watchers need their time or money for merch tables at anime cons

Octavian Collins: Mommy, I running, I ran downstairs and I fell b- before.

I was trying to place in the stairs, and now I need a replacement.

Simone Collins: Well, I will give you a replacement after we’re done recording. But now you can just leave that here, and I’ll fix it when I’m done recording, okay?

Octavian Collins: Okay. You can let me use one of the pins from that

Simone Collins: like- That is exactly what- Yeah ... I’m gonna be doing.

Octavian Collins: Yeah, you can get, like, another of these, like, from the other finger thing.

Simone Collins: Yeah, just leave it on your desk, okay?

Octavian Collins: Okay.

Simone Collins: Thank you, love. Have fun. Be safe.

Speaker 26: A ravine A ravine? Yeah. That’s scary. Do you want the kids to survive? Yeah. Do you want the evil hacker to survive? Yeah. Oh, well, let’s see what happens. Uh-oh. Doesn’t look good for him, does it? I don’t think- You don’t like him very much? Where’s the ravine? The ravine? Well, he’s kind of in it now

In this Based Camp episode, Simone and Malcolm Collins explore an expanded framework for personal morality and “modern sins” designed to maximize mental health, personal efficacy, and long-term human flourishing. Framed through a Christian and Techno-Puritan lens, they discuss how biblical morality has iteratively improved over time and why we need updated rules for today’s world.

Topics include: avoiding busywork and performative suffering, rejecting pride and status signaling, the dangers of inaction and moral absolutism, self-flagellation, empty words, corrupted mercy, and living with aplomb. They emphasize consequentialist ethics focused on future human (and post-human) flourishing through science, technology, and disciplined living.

A practical guide to building a better life, overcoming common traps, and aligning daily actions with higher purpose. Applicable to Christians, secular listeners, and anyone seeking a high-agency value system.

Techno-Puritan Sins, Summarized

Sin, per Techno-Puritanism, is any pattern of behavior—mental, emotional, or practical—that wastes your capacity or undermines long-term flourishing for yourself or humanity.

All Techno-Puritan sins are derived from a single principle:

* Maximize long-term human flourishing and effectiveness

* Minimize:

* Wasted effort

* Short-term thinking

* Self-indulgent or performative behavior

1. Acting from social expectation (performative living)

It is sinful to:

* Do things just because they’re expected (e.g., ceremonies, reunions).

* Especially when they don’t align with your goals or values.

Why? Obligation without purpose is wasted life energy.

2. Pride as social comparison (“proving others wrong”)

It is sinful to motivate yourself primarily by:

* Showing others you’re better than them.

* Seeking validation through superiority.

Why? External validation distorts decision-making. Seeking it may produce shallow or misaligned decisions.

3. Living to fit an image or archetype

It is sinful to:

* Make decisions to match a role (e.g., “ideal Christian,” “alpha male,” “tradwife”).

* Prioritize appearance of virtue over actual outcomes.

Why? Doing so drives one to “perform goodness” instead of doing good and leads to inefficient or even harmful choices.

4. Wasted effort / misaligned roles

It is sinful to do things that:

* Don’t actually help others

* Aren’t valued by those they’re meant to serve (e.g. Performing “ideal spouse” behaviors that your partner doesn’t need or want.)

Why? Effort without impact is morally wasteful.

5. Busywork (major emphasis)

It is sinful to:

* Spend time on on tasks that feel productive but aren’t meaningful (e.g. Working 12 hours but accomplishing less than 2 focused hours.)

* This Includes:

* Overwork without output

* Performative productivity

* Inefficient labor

Why it’s considered especially bad:

* Reduces overall effectiveness

* Crowds out meaningful work

* Worse than leisure because it gives no recovery or benefit

6. Pure indulgence without purpose

It is sinful to

* Do things solely for personal pleasure with no broader benefit (e.g. indulging in excess entertainment or sexual behavior detached from long-term outcomes)

Nuance:

* Some indulgence is tolerated if it supports long-term function (rest, motivation).

7. Performative suffering / overwork signaling

It is sinful to:

* Show off stress, exhaustion, or hardship as a badge of honor.

* This includes:

* Bragging about long hours

* Glorifying burnout

Why? Suffering is not inherently virtuous—only meaningful outcomes are.

8. Emotional indulgence (lack of “aplomb”)

It is sinful to adopt unproductive emotional states, such as:

* Self-pity

* Anger

* Excessive grief expression

* Cynicism or snark

Why?

* Emotions are (to a degree) controllable and reinforce themselves.

* Indulging in negative emotions:

* Harms others

* Weakens self-control

* Reduces effectiveness

* Conversely, maintaining calm, forward-moving resilience, especially in hardship, imparts strength to oneself and others

9. Self-deception about morality

It is sinful to convince yourself that:

* You’re being virtuous when you’re not

* Busywork or image-performance equals goodness

Why? Mislabeling behavior prevents improvement.

10. Failure to pursue meaningful contribution

It is sinful to not direct effort toward:

* Long-term human progress

* Knowledge, science, or societal development

Why? Immediate charity often distracts from long-term impact and can actively run counter to efforts that would maximize long-term human flourishing.

Episode Transcript

Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are going to be discussing personal re- morality as it relates to, one, this is going to focus on just general advice for living a good life. Hmm. And a good way to structure your life to overcome many of the challenges that people face.

So this would be applicable to people of Christian perspective, non-Christian perspective, techno-Puritan perspective. But I’m gonna be couching it within the framing of I’m talking to Christians here. Okay? And the reason I’m couching it in that is because when we look at something like the Bible, people often get hung up.

They’re like, “Wait, so I read all these parts about morality and, like, the seven deadly sins in the Bible and the Commandments, and then I read stuff like, ‘If a man sells his daughter as a slave, she is not to go free as male slaves do. If she does not please the master who selected her for himself, he must let her be redeemed.

He has no right to sell her to other foreigners because he has broken faith with [00:01:00] her. If he selects her for his sons, he must grant her the rights of a daughter. If he marries her to another woman, he must not deprive the first one of food, clothing, or marital rights. If he does not provide her with these things, she is to go free without any payment of money.’”

And people are like, “Wait, is that a bunch of rules about how to sell your daughter into slavery and then treat her afterwards?” You know, like, they do seem like nice rules about selling your daughter into slavery, but it would seem like it might have been better to just not do that, to just be like, if you’re thinking of selling your daughter into slavery, and, like, pretty clearly because it, it talks about potentially marrying her sex slavery is what we would call that today don’t do it.

And the way that Christians and Jews get around this is they go, “Well, iteratively, that was a more moral way of dealing with slavery than other common traditions of this period.” Hmm. And we have a whole episode where we go through that. And if you look at our last tract where we also went into morality at the societal level, we talk about the [00:02:00] many...

Like, you, you remember me going over them. It was a number of them, places in the Bible where God commands people to kill infants, and lots of infants. Like, the number of infants is very, very high, right?

Speaker 7: If you want to go through that, check out the episode, “Christianity Was Never a Religion of Peace” that we released, last week. It’s a great episode. , We cite all the verses where this happens, , and it’s a pretty frequent thing throughout the Old Testament

Malcolm Collins: And so people are like, “Okay, well,” he told people to do that because those societies were practicing child sacrifice.”

And I was like, “That’s not a very moral answer.” That’s like saying, “Oh, we rescued a bunch of children from Epstein’s island, so we killed them all?” Like, presumably if you’re saving the children who might be child sacrifice, right? Like, you don’t kill the... And note here the term used in some of these instances.

You can’t be like, “Oh, he’s only talking about toddlers who has absorbed the culture.” They use terms meaning, like, breastfeeding infant, like suckling infants, right? Like, [00:03:00] very young. So it’s like, okay What’s going on here, right? Was this just like iteratively more moral than what came before it? Do these types of things still hold?

And how does this hold at like a personal level? And what I’ll note here is what we see, if you take the stance that God said all of this because it was iteratively better than the way things used to be done before he laid those things out, then presumably it’s been a pretty long time since the New Testament was written.

More is expected of us or a more advanced understanding of morality is expected from us than what- Yeah ... was laid out in the New Testament

So what are those things? And that’s what we’re gonna go into today, is basically a new and expanded understanding of sins that will help you be like, “Hmm, if I just make a personal commitment to never do this list of [00:04:00] things, I will be both a much more mentally healthy person, I will be a much more efficacious person, and I will be able to do a lot more to push human civilization forwards.”

And note here when we talk about pushing human civilization forwards, obviously this is a wider, like, technopuri- puritan track series, but it’s, we try to make them more applicable to general Christians now as well. One of the fun things that you see in regards to us talking about the sons of man, which you also see all over the Bible.

You know, by the way, I didn’t make up the term the sons of man. That’s all over the Old Testament. Very weird way to talk about people. Why would you talk about people as the sons of man, right? Like, that’s a... W- why in

Simone Collins: the world- Yeah, why not just, you know, humans or people?

Malcolm Collins: Why not just man, right? Well, suppose that these rules were supposed to apply to not just the humans we have today, but when we become a space-faring species, when we take our manifest destiny among the stars, we’re going to need to use genetic technology.

You basically have to. You can’t easily have people live their entire lives in zero G without some [00:05:00] form of gene editing, and most other planets are gonna require some gene editing to live on. And how extensive that goes could be bigger than that. You’re gonna eventually have some humans that are AI integrations.

You’re gonna have some humans... we’re gonna have AI working alongside us. So we take the sons of man to mean all of the intelligences which are downstream of humanity be those AI intelligences, uplifted animals, human intelligences of the far future that are genetically modified and stuff like that, and that’s why it says the sons of man.

I like that fun little, like, weird prediction of the applicability that that would have to have, but it tracks with the way society looks like it’s going. So if we’re looking at that and we’re asking, okay, so if God’s sort of broader moral framework and at least how it’s expressed seems to shift over time how can we find out what he really wanted with those frameworks?

Like, what was the point of the frameworks as they were laid out? And it appears [00:06:00] fairly clear, because we can look at the effects that these frameworks had on individuals and society at large. Okay. Which is an increased amount of human flourishing, right? This is human technological, civilizational flourishing, right?

The reason why you would want to create more humane rules around the selling of your daughter into slavery

Speaker 3: I was on a stream with Leaflet and somebody was asking, “What are sins?” ‘Cause we were talking about them more broadly, and I was like, “When you boil it down, sins are just a list of things that will up your life.”

Some of them may seem like a good idea in the short term,. In the same way eating candy every morning for breakfast might.

Speaker 6: What’s going on? Maybe it’s all this stuff that you both eat. Oh, you get off that? No, honestly, it’s true. Okay. Moss, what did you have for breakfast this morning? Smarty Cereal. Oh my God. I didn’t even know Smarty made a [00:07:00] cereal. They don’t. It’s just smarties and a bowl with milk.

Speaker 3: But in the long term, you’re going to suffer from it. It’s basically a long list of... And we saw this in one of the recent episodes we did on, , you know, rampant consumerization of human sexuality leading to the normalization of things like abortion and this destroying people’s lives, right?

, The, the sin that they were committing, , ended up having this absolutely huge deleterious negative impact on them. The women who go out and w***e themselves when they’re younger, the effect that this is gonna happen when they hit the wall, and then nobody wants them anymore, and then, , you know, you see this with pride, lying.

, Look at what’s going on with the Bricks & Minifigs CEO right now, right? , There is no sin, there’s no, like, rule that we’re given that isn’t long term in our own best interest. Sins are just a really [00:08:00] long list of, “Don’t piss on the electric fence.” , And so if we are increasing the number of sins or expanding our understanding of sin, , it’s basically expanding this.

Good rules to live by, good things to look out for. And when I pointed this out on, on stream, some people were like, “Well, no, you know, sins need to be, like, this really difficult thing to deal with. This really, like...” And it’s like they are insofar that anything you do purely for your own self-interest is a sin.

, EG playing video games or something like that. , And e- and even those things can eventually have negative effects on you. , But in terms of the more, like, explicitly labeled sins, , for example, sleeping with another dude’s wife, right? Like, it may feel good in the moment, but not even... Y- you don’t even need to say, like, civilizationally this is a bad idea to normalize.

It’s just obviously gonna come back and cause you more pain in the, in the long term.

And I would also [00:09:00] note that this seems to be a core thing that differentiates Christianity from other Abrahamic traditions. Like, I don’t think there’s anything actually negative, at least within a modern context, , where like a Muslim can’t eat pork, right? Like, I don’t think pork actually has any negative externalities in a modern context.

Or where a Jew cannot mix, you know, linen and flax in a single outfit. but in Christianity, I am unaware of any Christian sins where I’m like, “This is just an obscure thing that was totally unique to a specific era.”

Malcolm Collins: Sorry, what, what does he want?

Simone Collins: He wants to tell the viewers what he learned.

Octavian Collins: Like Germs can go in your body and some- they’re, they’re like tiny little dots, they can multiply. Multiply. Wait.

Malcolm Collins: So germs

Octavian Collins: get into you- White blood cells kind of have like mouth thingies that eat the [00:10:00] like germs that are like the other things I was talking about recently, the green things.

Simone Collins: Smart. Smart

Malcolm Collins: so first, how do you determine , , and the fact that the way that God expresses his morality has changed over time shows that the intentionality of God on humanity through these systems as they have evolved is that is, it’s consequentialist in its framing, right?

Like it, it, it is based on some outcome, right?

Simone Collins: Well, and as you framed it in a different conversation when you discussed morality on the societal level, you argue that the New Testament was made for a point- At which human civilization had become much more globalized already, and you had different cultures interacting more, and you needed to begin to mask the brutality of Christianity to appear to be symbiotic so as to not become an existential threat to other cultures and obligate those cultures to completely [00:11:00] take out Christianity.

Malcolm Collins: Exactly. But it, but even, I mean, during the early period when they enter it ended the period where that was necessary. When they began to take over the, the Roman Empire they did not forget how brutal their religious teachings actually are. Mm. They just that, that only became sublimated later.

That only... I- in like the last 100 years, I wanna say, is really when the, all those parts of the Bible were forgotten. But to continue here. Except by some groups like the Quakers who, they annoy me, and the Anabaptists who I generally like. But anyway, to continue here. So what’s a good way to build your life in terms of like moral rules and everything like that?

So first, and you can see how to do this in The Pragmatist’s Guide to Life, is build an objective function. That is, think through whatever it is, whether it’s because God, you know, you’re coming at this from a Christian perspective or you’re coming at this from a completely secular perspective the collection of things that you think is of intrinsic good to maximize with your life.[00:12:00]

And then build a set of functions around that. By that what I mean is it might be like, well, within my life, maybe some of these things will be purely indulgent. I think I need X level of happiness, and once that’s satisfied, then I will put all of my effort into X or Y. You know, that’s the way functions are constructed.

Like 50% into doing this, 50% into doing this. Now if you’re a techno-puritan, you’re just gonna have one framing coming from what I was talking about here, which is what is God’s plan? God’s plan is continued human flourishing, so it’s probably some level of comfort. And then once you reach that level of comfort that’s needed for, you know, maximum personal efficacy and not distraction then focus on maximizing future human flourishing.

And this is often best done through scientific advancement, which we’re gonna get to in a bit, right? Which is to say, generally speaking there are many places where you could, for example give money to the poor, right? And over, in 100 years, [00:13:00] in 200 years, because God doesn’t love somebody in 200 years and I don’t care less about somebody in 200 years than I care about a human today which is going to help more aggregate people?

Almost always things that help the civilization continue developing are going to have a bigger impact. And, and note that’s not just technology. That’s things that help it economically develop. That’s things that help it develop in terms of its moral systems how it deals with outside or parasitic groups that are exploiting systems.

So we’ll get into all of that. And also note here this line I think highlights what I think is expected In terms of dedicating yourself to an extent to continued scientific progress. When we did our episode on Genesis not being incompatible with science one of the things we, we, we kept getting in the comments is, like, people forgot that, like, all of the early scientific advancements were made by people who were trying to understand God better.

Yeah. Right? Like, they, they... And, and even the Bible, like, goes into this. So, if you look at lines like, “ It is the glory of God [00:14:00] to conceal a matter. To search out a matter is the glory of kings.” Mm. Which is to say you, the best of you, the best of humanity your greatest endeavor is the search of knowledge of things that God has not made immediately obvious, right?

Mm. So when somebody’s like, “Oh, well, you know, God didn’t exactly and very cleanly lay out evolution in the Bible,” why didn’t he do that, right? Why, why wasn’t that done? It’s like, oh, it’s the glory of God to conceal a matter, and to search out a matter is the glory of kings. Which is to say that if you take a approach to everything that does not update post Jesus’ time perspective on our understanding of nature and the world, you’re literally acting in rebellion to what the Bible is telling you to do.

Simone Collins: Right.

Malcolm Collins: All right. So- If you’re just inventing a religion for, like, savages, telling them, like, “Don’t give yourself to lust, don’t give yourself to gluttony, don’t give yourself...” You know, like, seven deadly sins, stuff like that. Original Ten [00:15:00] Commandments. Very easy rules. But there are so many deleterious things that trap humans today at a significantly more socially and morally developed standpoint.

I think it’s worth laying out additional sins so that you can easily categorize these in your head. So let’s jump right into these.

Speaker 4: Note, , I think the majority of the additional sins I’m gonna be laying out are things that we are warned against at some point or another in the New Testament. , It’s just that the warnings are often not as explicit or salient in the way that the New Testament is often taught today.

, So if I give one of these out and you’re like, “Oh, actually, , this line here could be used to mean that,” yeah, I know

Malcolm Collins: And do try to keep track as we’re going, Simone, so you can add any that you think I miss here. Okay. ‘Cause we now have, like, actual people who follow our religion. I’m like, well, if we’re doing that, we should do more to help them live a good life,

Simone Collins: right?

Well, we need to make our... I mean, we’re gonna be following these rules, too. We’ve been discussing this all week, so we need to have our own internal... [00:16:00] Well, we need a list we can publish somewhere. Yeah. Well, this

Malcolm Collins: actually came up with me this week, where I was like, should I go to my high school reunion, or should I not go to my high school reunion?

And it would have been, like, a 24-hour car ride, right? And I was like, one, no, that is against my objective function. It is cleanly against my objective function. It is purely indulgent, but it’s not even an indulgence that will make me happy. And this here comes to the first sin of modernity, which is doing a thing because of societal expectation.

Simone Collins: Mm.

Malcolm Collins: You... Anytime you do a thing just because you think that it is what’s expected of you, like a graduation ceremony. How did the graduation ceremony actually help you, right? Or is it just a waste of time? Now, if you are doing it because your parents paid for you to go to college, and they’ll be proud, and that’s why you’re going, fine.

But if your parents aren’t showing up, why are you? Right? That is time that you could be [00:17:00] spending on doing something productive that moves yourself forward, educating yourself more, or moves human civilization forward. A second one here, which I’m really, this comes to the graduation thing. I wanna go to the graduation and I wanna show all these people, look at, look at me.

Look, look at how great I am these days, right? I’m doing so much better than you. I have a Wikipedia page. I have all these followers. A that, that makes me amazing, and look at you and your sad lives th- that aren’t doing anything, right? That-

Simone Collins: Which, and this, this is a big motivational factor for many people.

Malcolm Collins: It is. Is what, what the Bible was trying to warn us about was pride. But I think people have recontextualized it. People motivate themselves, and I motivated myself when I was younger in a big way by owning the people who thought they were better than me. And this is a unique, I think even genetically baked in problem with people of the backwards tradition.

Yeah. Is we just love, get deep satisfaction of owning people who think they’re better than us. And I’m not [00:18:00] saying you should never indulge in that satisfaction if you can use it to motivate efficacious and moral behavior. However I am saying that you shouldn’t do it if it’s leading you to do something which is purely indulgent.

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: This is the same way where, like, feeling good during sex isn’t bad if you’re using it for procreation, obviously, right? ‘

Simone Collins: Cause that’s the point. That’s what is, it was evolved to motivate.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, but it can still pull you down a path of evil, right? If you approach it the wrong way. All right, so, tho- f- first two sins laid out there.

Next, living to maximize your image in somebody else’s eyes. I have noticed many people-

Simone Collins: You mean to look good to other people?

Malcolm Collins: No

Simone Collins: Maximize your image. What does that mean?

Malcolm Collins: They build their heuristics for making decisions. We have an episode where we talk about Honza, who is an example of somebody who does [00:19:00] this, where we notice that this m- male thought leading influencer in, like, the red pill-ish diaspora community was basically saying when he was making major life decisions, like, what decision is the more mannish decision to make?

What decision is the more masculine decision to make? He is optimizing his major life decisions around fitting some image that he thinks is the image that he needs to be living. Not towards- Mm-hmm ... the effect that that image will have on society, not towards the effect that image is gonna have on other people, not towards anything that’s efficacious, but entirely based on an image.

Simone Collins: Right. So, okay, the, the, the distinction here is, is that it’s, it’s about an archetype, fitting an archetype, and that being really not, not cool. Yeah. Don’t live your life to try to fit an archetype, like the sexy woman, the desirable man, the tough guy, the, the saintly caretaker, if that’s just what you’re trying to satisfy without understanding the moral [00:20:00] fundamentals, the, the values that you’re working to serve.

Malcolm Collins: Yes.

So, and, and where this can become really dangerous for people who otherwise would frame themselves as good Christians is they attempt to fit the image of a good Christian. They abandon actual morality for a social role in maximizing that social role

Simone Collins: Okay, yeah

Malcolm Collins: This can be a big problem for like trad wives,

like, if it’s the self-image of a tradwife, if it’s the self-image of a tradhusband, if it’s the self-image of a good Christian woman, for example. And people can say, why is that a bad thing to do if it’s a positive self-image? And it’s because attempting to maximize positive self-images is something that can lead to immorality.

So let’s- Well,

Simone Collins: I think what’s worse is, like, let’s say that your goal is to serve God, and then the way you think you can moor to that is by [00:21:00] invoking in your mind the image of the most holy, saintly person, and if I just sort of cosplay maximally well as that caricature, then presumably I- I’ve got my bases covered.

The problem is then you will think that you are actually doing morally good things, when instead you are just putting on the costume of someone who does morally good things and congratulating yourself for it and, and assuming that it’s all working out just fine when it’s really not.

Malcolm Collins: Exactly. And, and to, to, to give examples of how this can, for example, destroy a marriage.

If one person is, rather than being a good wife because they want to serve humanity and society by serving their children and their husband, for example they can say, “Well, these are the strict roles and things that a tradwife is supposed to do, and you as a husband are supposed to make all of these things doable for me,” right?

And so then the family ends up in a scenario where they may, for a child’s medical bills, require a second [00:22:00] income or something like that. Mm-hmm. And the woman doesn’t end up doing that, and it causes the man bitterness, and then they end up fighting with each other. The woman doesn’t under- Like, the, the, the things that she’s doing aren’t even really appreciated by the husband.

Like, the reason you’re supposed to do all these tradwifey things are because it is for the behalf of the husband, right? Like, they, presumably they like these things. What if they don’t even value these things, right, and they would prefer you did something else that is difficult for you to do? Now it’s just completely wasted effort.

And waste-

Simone Collins: Yeah, that’s a really good point. What a lot of tradwife influencers are things that, like, women want to do for themselves and that men don’t really care about.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And, and wasted effort is inherently sinful because every amount of effort that you waste is time you could have spent on something else.

Mm-hmm. Here I guess I’ll just go into the next sin which is busywork busywork is as sin as doing something that is [00:23:00] directly immoral without societal externalities. Hmm. So I, I guess e- examples here, right? I think anything you do that’s, like, personally indulgent and doesn’t move society forwards is sinful because we see from Romans, Okay, so

Simone Collins: that could just be, like, doing a spa day instead of working toward something you value.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Anything you don’t do for God or anything you cannot say to be doing for God is a sin, and if God’s goal is the long-term flourishing of humanity, anything that’s not contributing to that is sinful. Now, we are all sinners. You shouldn’t expect to live a sinf- sinless life.

Simone Collins: Sure.

Malcolm Collins: However, many people confuse themselves and lie to themselves by acting as if they are doing something less sinful by doing pointless busywork than by doing something like playing video games or masturbating,

Simone Collins: right?

Well, yeah, I think something uniquely common in the United States, where you see a lot of performative suffering and performative exhaustion, is people... And actually, this, I think, happens a lot in Asia too, where you see, like, the six-day workweeks and people who work extra long, and the norms [00:24:00] of you can’t leave your office in Japan until your boss leaves, and your boss stays way long that, well, if you’re suffering and if you’re not happy and it’s really not fun, then you’re working really hard and you’re doing good things, when really, like, okay, great, you’re miserable and you’ve just wasted a ton of time.

And why-

Malcolm Collins: Like,

Simone Collins: that

Malcolm Collins: is- Yeah, why busywork is strictly a higher form of sin than- Hmm ... pure indulgence

Simone Collins: than- Yeah, like you should have just played a video game for- Yeah ... three hours that day, spent one hour actually doing meaningful work instead of being so sleep deprived and stressed out that you could only do 15 minutes of actually productive work that day.

Malcolm Collins: Exactly,

Simone Collins: because it lowers- Even though you’re in an office for, like, 12 hours ...

Malcolm Collins: it lowers your overall efficiency, right? Yeah. Like, at least f- forms of indulgence can help you stay sane- Yeah ... feel rewarded, feel motivated. Busywork does not do that, right?

Simone Collins: That’s a really good point.

Malcolm Collins: A- and so it is a worse sin and more of a sin to call out in your partner, in yourself than other forms of, of [00:25:00] sin.

It is, it is truly a- This is

Simone Collins: for sure my biggest, like, I, I struggle with this. It’s

Malcolm Collins: your biggest sin by far. Yeah. It’s your only sin, really. I don’t see you d- sin in any other way than busywork.

Simone Collins: Well, I think it’s... And but this is where I need advice on this sin is I feel like often I lack the judgment in really understanding where I should be putting my time and focus.

I mean, that’s

Malcolm Collins: my- I think that you know perfectly well when you’re doing something that doesn’t actually need to be done as frequently as you’re doing it, but you do it as an indulgence in the same way that I play video games as an indulgence because you feel that you won’t be able to hear yourself think, as you say, if you don’t do it.

The question is, are you on, being honest with yourself about how much of that busywork you need to do to hear yourself think and how much of it is just performative?

Simone Collins: Hmm.

So- Well, I guess what we do is I check in with you a lot. I should check in with you more on, like, help me balance this out and sanity check this.

And probably having a third party. It could be a person, ideally, you know, like your spouse or something, but it could [00:26:00] also probably be an AI- ... if you’re operating independently.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah,

Simone Collins: busywork. Just evaluating it. Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Which I, which I... And one of the things was, like, that’s not in the Bible. Like, the Bible, they didn’t have busywork at the time of Jesus.

It just wasn’t a sin that he needed to warn people about, right?

Speaker 10: So Simone’s gonna mention a passage that could be taken to mean this, which I love that there are passages, and then in addition to that passage, you could also take the parable of talents from Matthew’s to be about this, or you could take Luke 10:38-42, Martha and Mary, to mean this. , And this is just really cool.

But, but, but you do actually see this in parts of the Bible with

but Martha was distracted with much serving, and she went to him and said, “Lord, do you not care that my sister has left me to serve alone? To her then to help me.” But the Lord answered her, “Martha, Martha, you are anxious and troubled by many things, but one thing is necessary. Marsha has chosen the good portion, [00:27:00] which cannot be taken away from her.”

But again, even if this is a parable against busy work, it’s often not in a salient context when I’m in like a church. Have I-- And I used to go to church every week. , Did I ever come away thinking, “Busy work is a sin. Gotta make sure not to do that”?

Simone Collins: No, I think the... There was a passage you read when we talked about societal morality about not suffering publicly.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, not suffering performatively.

Simone Collins: That is an extreme vice in the United States. Again, like bragging about sleep deprivation.

Malcolm Collins: Well, this is, this is not in the busy work category of sin. This is in the I’d say- No ... a plum sin.

Simone Collins: No, because people brag about the hours. They go, “Oh, I work 60-hour weeks, blah,

Malcolm Collins: blah, blah.” Right, but this isn’t, this isn’t that. This sin is very different. So this is the aplum sin which means not acting with aplum is sinful.

I’m sorry,

Simone Collins: we’ve moved on to a new one.

Malcolm Collins: Yes. Okay, [00:28:00] yeah. So this covers a number of emotional states which are adopted for purely indulgent reasons- Mm-hmm ... and don’t actually help you.

Simone Collins: Oh, like acting exasperated or-

Malcolm Collins: Yes ... snarky. You are taking on a negative emotional state- Uh-huh ... which causes negative externalities for everyone around you.

Mm-hmm. It causes your children, your spouse, your coworkers to be less happy, to be less productive. It causes you to be less happy and less productive, when at the end of the day, emotions are generally a choice. You can choose how you contextualize. You know, you get fired from a job, for example. You can say, “Oh, woe is me,” right?

Or you can say, “Oh, well, this is exciting. Now I get to try to look for something new. Now I get a change of pace. Now I get a new challenge.” And people are like, “Well, what if something truly bad happens? Like, what if Simone died,” right? Then it is extra upon me to not act with sadness and with grief.

Because if I do [00:29:00] that, who suffers? Who suffers from that?

The people who are going to suffer the most are going to be my kids, and they just lost a mom Okay?

Simone Collins: Yeah That- Do they also want to have a, an absent, emotionally ruined, angry, grieving, sad, bereft father? Like, you don’t wanna lose two parents, you know?

Malcolm Collins: The, the implication of this sin is proportional to the severity of the loss that you have undergone.

Right. It’s the severity, the time when you need to act with the most aplomb. And note this isn’t generic happiness aplomb. Th- this is, you know, acting with plucky continued diligence and move forwardness like a happy soldier. Those are the times when it is the bleakest for you. Yeah. When can you least afford to have self-pity is when you just got fired and have a family to support.

Simone Collins: Exactly.

Malcolm Collins: When can you least afford to act [00:30:00] with these other forms of indulgence, it is when you most feel them, right? And so don’t wait until something really bad happens to adopt this. And I’ve, I’ve noted here, I’ve watched some Mormon influencers, and they complain that Mormons are told to do this, right?

That they’re

Simone Collins: told- Oh, yeah. El- Alyssa Grenfell explicitly goes on about how it’s really messed up that there’s sort of a limited amount of grieving that is considered socially acceptable within the LDS church. And like per, like traditions and the way that funerals go and memorial services. Yeah, and it’s really interesting to hear her talk about that when w- we would see that as such a s- like a huge, huge sign of the church’s good taste.

There are other moral rules- Right ... that we’ve been talking about internally that we’re like, “Man, this backfired.” Like, they, they completely did this the wrong way. Like setting certain standards, either contemporarily or historically, that just are being completely misconstrued or have been outsized to [00:31:00] out- sorry, outsourced to outside authorities.

Like saying, “Oh, we don’t watch rated R movies,” but then having this completely unassociated non-Mormon body determine what the R rating is based on. You know? This is,

Malcolm Collins: this is actually where this, this today’s sort of tract because we, we don’t number the tracts anymore. Mm-hmm. This is technically a techno-puritan tract, but it’s applicable to all Christians or people more broadly came from, which is we were talking about the words of wisdom, which is where, like, don’t do this stuff is laid out by Joseph Smith.

And some of this is useful, like the be happy thing. Other of it is just wasteful. Like, don’t drink hot liquids, like coffee and stuff like that. Like, at the time, they thought that it had, like, negative health effects, but we now know that it doesn’t. It actually has positive health effects, and it’s been very well studied.

So it’s like, oh, like, we should have a techno-puritan words of wisdom. We should have something where I try to go through and future-proof these, so I can try to-

Simone Collins: Well, yeah, I don’t, I don’t know if it was negative health effects. M- it might have been that it was recognized that caffeine was addictive, or that it was- Right

un- an unnecessary expense That didn’t yield, you know, caloric [00:32:00] benefit. But for whatever reason, now even if, like, caffeine is the thing to be avoided which from a health perspective doesn’t make sense because it’s, it’s broadly seen as having health benefits on the aggregate aside from being addictive, though it is quite addictive.

Now you have all these Mormons drinking heavily caffeinated, often dirty sodas, you know, very high in calories, not helpful calories and, and not drinking coffee, like a zero calorie m- you know, moderately healthy drink if you don’t put a ton of stuff in it. It, it’s clearly something that’s not being optimally construed as a word of wisdom.

Malcolm Collins: Absolutely, yeah. So we’re like, “Let’s, let’s build these, but try to make them better and future-proof.” So also you guys can warn me if I ever do something in a track and you’re like, “That could have really long-term negative ramifications.”

Simone Collins: Yeah, we wanna know ...

Malcolm Collins: if, if the community becomes, like, really big and fanatic, ‘cause I always try to think, “How is a fanatic gonna operate on this,” right?

Mm-hmm. Like, if, if [00:33:00] somebody goes down that pathway 200 years from now, right? And that’s also why the tracks take so long to produce, is because I need to go through, you know, everything I’m saying and think, “How could a fanatic twist this?” But the happiest thing I just see is... And for people who aren’t aware of this, they can be like, “Well, isn’t it, like, a part it’s, like, useful to grieve?

It’s useful to experience negative things. It’s useful to experience anger and sadness.” And it’s like, it’s strictly not. Mm. We know from studies that, like, if you punch a wall when you’re angry, you have a harder time in the future controlling your anger. If you, if let yourself cry, like just have a cry when you’re sad, you’re going to cry at lower thresholds in the future.

The reason for this is when you stop yourself from these forms of emotional indulgence is you are activating the inhibitory pathway in your prefrontal cortex, which gets stronger with each activation. If you have not frequently activated it, you are incredibly susceptible to intrusive thoughts and intrusive emotional states.

Mm-hmm. Which [00:34:00] puts you... Like, it’s just, this isn’t even just a for your family thing, it’s just worse for you. Because presumably being sad or being stressed or going over about how hard you’re working these days I probably... Would you say I work harder than anyone you know, or in terms of

Simone Collins: like- yeah.

You absolutely work harder than anyone I know. You wake up at 2:00 AM in the morning to start working, and you work through every moment of the day that I ever see you. Like-

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I mean, people could

Simone Collins: see- ... you might take an hour every day to chill, and I mean, th- this is also, like, it’s not that you have some kind of period where you’re unwinding while, like, making dinner, ‘cause I do that.

Like, you have almost zero wind-down time unless you’re, like, hauling out trash or hauling in groceries for the family. So- Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: So, but do you ever see me complain about how overworked I am or how

Simone Collins: stressed I am? No, never. Nev- Or- I’ve never heard you talk about being overworked.

Malcolm Collins: Whistle while you work, right?

I work with happiness. I work constantly and I work with happiness, and that’s an [00:35:00] easy thing to do. Because there is no moment in your entire life will you were- ever feel as good Is when you are s- suffering and sacrificing for a well-thought-through value system. Yeah. That is the greatest happiness that any human has access to, and the people who chase directly after hedonism- Mm

even when they have all of the resources they could ever want, as I’ve pointed out, they live the most tortured lives. Who are the people I have met who live the most tortured lives? They are the famous actors and actresses. Mm. You know, they’re, they, they have everything they want- For

Simone Collins: people who live pure lives of leisure it’s-

Malcolm Collins: All the fame-

very scary ... all the hedonism, all the sex, all the partners, all the respect, and yet they are mentally destroyed, and they often die of drug overdoses and stuff like that, and are seeing a thousand therapists, and are living states of mental terror. They are terrorized by their own mind because of this, because they went down a pathway that was not based on sacrificing through hard work and with a [00:36:00] plum for attempting to make the world better.

And when you see actors who clearly do live by that, you typically see them live very happy, fulfilled lives. Consider, like Mr. Rogers, for example. Like, he wasn’t like... He, he clearly had, like a moral value system, and he attempted- Yeah ... to push it through his show to advance human society. Mm. And you didn’t see him, like, get addicted to drugs and crash out in a, a parking lot somewhere, right?

We are rewarded for making these sacrifices and exhibiting this self-control, and you will be rewarded for fighting sin, even within this expanded category.

Speaker 5: So a lot of people, we did a video recently about people who did like gang bangs and the horror shows that their lives can descend into, and people wanted us to be like angrier or speak about them with more disgust. And it’s like this is-- Oh, it’s not something I’m drawn to. It’s not a sin that I’m tempted [00:37:00] by, thankfully.

, But in addition to that, like their lives compared to the lives that Simone and I and my kids live are literal hellscapes. Like I know some of these people and even my friends in this group, I know the mental torture they go through being like, “How am I gonna make this work?

How am I gonna have a family? How am I gonna...” And I want to help them, and I can offer them guidance, but there’s only so much I can do. And so I think, you know, when you see the end state of what happens to these people and what it’s like to be them, , it’s a lot harder to be-- to, to look at them with so much anger

When you accept that the additional rules that we live by are not arbitrary restrictions that make our lives harder and are just meant to make society a better place or something, but actively improve our own lives, it’s a lot harder to hate somebody for breaking those rules, for being a sinner.

Malcolm Collins: So next. Moral absolutism [00:38:00] is the next sin.

Simone Collins: Hmm.

Malcolm Collins: This is allowing primitive- ... or overtly extreme signs of acting moral to override what is actually moral, right?

This is where the Vatican says, “Oh, just bring in endless immigrants-” “... because the Bible said you should feed foreigners and you should feed the poor, and so we’re gonna maximize that line out of context. And through that, we’re gonna bring in endless foreigners and- ... who cares what long-term impact this is gonna have on the people we’re bringing into the country, right?

Who cares what long-term impact- ... this is gonna have on their family when the citizens get pissed off and they decide to deport them and they have kids in the country- ... and all the kids are separated from their parents, and that all could’ve been avoided if you just hadn’t brought them in in the first place.

Or you leave them in the country and they end up overtaxing the social safety net, and then pensioners don’t get their pensions, and people who relied on Social Security in the country don’t get their Social Security and they starve to [00:39:00] death like there are negative externalities from this. And this sort of moral absolutism you see whether it’s coming from the Vatican, because it’s often very indulgent, right?

It is, it is moral hedonism as we’ve defined it. It’s saying, “Oh, I’m the good guy here,” right? Like, “I’m doing the good thing,” without considering the consequences. It’s saying I have some deontological... This is why I always crash out about the deontologists, because what deontology really does is push the cost of your moral purity onto outsiders.

When you say, “I won’t ever kill,” and then an intruder breaks into your house and rapes one of your kids because you wouldn’t fight back. And this, like functionally really happened when there, like pirates happened in in, around Philadelphia, and the Quakers wouldn’t, wouldn’t send forces

Simone Collins: to deal with them.

Oh, yeah. A long, historically,

Malcolm Collins: yes. And people were terrorized and brutalized because a- at the cost of their moral purity, right? That is functionally evil, right? Because, a- and they [00:40:00] are as responsible or more responsible for those atrocities than the pirates themselves.

Speaker 12: And there, there are ways of approaching

non-consequentialist frameworks that prevent the extremes, like Thomism, which I’m not particularly against. It just feels like a weasel out for me. It feels like a way of framing morality where you don’t have to deal with the potential extremes of either consequentialist or non-consequentialist world perspectives.

And I guess that’s good in that it doesn’t have the extreme negatives, but I also feel like it doesn’t accept the full moral weight that is important to accept of a moral framing. It just uses a bunch of rules to carve off the extremes

And the rules feel arbitrary and non-morally weighty to me. I think any real and good moral system is going to push you to positions that a normal person would be mortified by because I, I think real moral [00:41:00] conviction looks like that. It looks like something where other people say, “Oh my God, like, why?

Why, why are you doing this?” And it’s like this, this, then this. , If something removes through whatever amount of thing any choice that goes against a person’s intuitions, , I, I think it’s removing moral complexity

And I think we can see in the Bible that God’s clearly not a Thomist when he punishes someone like Saul for not killing literally everyone and their animals of the enemy tribe. That’s not within the bounds of Thomas ethics. Yes, self-defense is, but something like that isn’t

Malcolm Collins: Because they said and note here people had asked on a call, so I should lay this out here.

There are times when a group having these beliefs, these moral absolutist beliefs, exerts a negative externality on society and times when they don’t. And the difference between the two is whether or not they are power hungry and why they are exerting the moral absolutism. Mm. So a good [00:42:00] differentiation here is Amish pacifism does not exert an externality on society because Amish don’t seek power for themselves.

They almost never hold elected office, and they often don’t even vote unless they’re actively being victimized as they have been in the most recent few election cycles. Whereas Mur- Quakers disproportionately historically held positions of power. And so they’re able to say even though it’s not Quakers who the police would be intervening on behalf of, “Oh, don’t, don’t go do that.”

And we see this not just from the Vatican, we see this from wokes all the time, you know, with this- Mm ... this, “Oh, I’m doing the more moral thing,” because on a surface level it looks more moral and I’m just maximizing these surface level rules. Or we can even see it on a when people go and spam racism or antisemitism in ways that isn’t like, this is where we need to be asking some serious questions about Israel, but where they’re trying to show off, right?

This is a very smoothed brain thing to do because these are groups that we’re going to have to work with in the future, right? Like [00:43:00] clearly if you look at their fertility rate, their level of influence you’re going to need to find a way to work with places like Israel and the Jews long-term, whatever cultural group you are.

And there is a big difference between just spamming something like, “Oh, I’d go to war with them in a second if I could.” The dumbest thing America could, could do, but some conservative influencers have actually said that. I’m like, “You idiot.” Like, d- think about the long-term implications of that. Yeah.

Simone Collins: Not smart ...

Malcolm Collins: yeah, it’s, it’s extremely stupid. And you could, oh, even if you what, purged... W- what’s your real end game? Even if you purged every Jew, right? Do you know what happens when you purge every Jew from a country, right? They go to other countries. And do you know what those other countries do with those now angry Jews?

They build atomic weapons. That’s what we did, okay? When we look at leaders historically, what they have said is, “Yes, the Jews might be an outside group. Yes, they might not always be aligned with us, but there are ways that I can utilize that community for my long-term benefit,” [00:44:00] which we saw with people like Oliver Cromwell bringing the Jews back to England to better fight the expansion of Romanism.

And I think that that shows, like, whe- how, how to think about this stuff without, even if you have an outside group, even if you have a group that has at times victimized you is worth considering. Okay, with all of that being true, what’s actually the best long-term path going forward for me to signal?

Octavian Collins: Hmm.

Malcolm Collins: Next, inaccurate. Inaction is a massive sin in the modern age, and very, very important to note. It’s when you say, “I will do,” and this is the most common form of it, “I will do X thing after I’ve accomplished Y thing,” when Y thing is not a necessary prerequisite for X thing. This is very different from traditional sloth.

Mm-hmm. Because when you think about traditional sloth, you’re not doing it because [00:45:00] you’re lazy. Inaction is something like saying, “Well, once I have the right body, like once I’m skinny enough and hot enough-

Simone Collins: Mm. Mm-hmm ...

Malcolm Collins: then I’m gonna start dating.”

Simone Collins: Or, once I’m certain that no one’s going to make fun of me if I do this, or that I’m 100% certain that I’m right.

Like, we’re not certain about anything. We’re, we’re just trying to move in the least incorrect direction possible, but we believe that it’s sinful to not move forward at all. Mm. Whereas a lot of people are like, “Well, if I’m not absolutely certain that I can move forward in the morally perfect way, I’m not going to move forward.”

And we think that that is, that is worse.

Malcolm Collins: That is that PA form of inaction, right?

Simone Collins: Yeah. You know, even if we’re moving forward in, like, a slightly wrong direction, in the end we’re gonna be closer to the morally good thing than you are if you’ve not moved at all.

Malcolm Collins: If you are like, “But I don’t have the information yet,” right?

Like if you’re in a state like the one that’s going... Come up with what test do you need to run to get that information?

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: [00:46:00] Not having enough information should never be a reason to not move forward anymore. If you’re a boss, you’ve had the employee who you come to them, you gave them a task, and they go, “Oh, sorry, I stopped like 20 minutes into the task when I realized I didn’t know how to do, like, stage two or something, or stage three.”

And you’re like, “What the f- is wrong with you,” right? Like genuinely I feel this way sometimes. I’m like, “You should have either immediately come to me when you stopped, right, and I would’ve told you what to do next, or figured it out.” But we are all- No,

Simone Collins: he’s talking about me. He’s, he’s just talking about me.

Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Oh, you have done that a few times recently. Mm-hmm. I’m not... I actually wasn’t thinking of you, but it is

a-

Simone Collins: Yeah, you were. It’s okay ...

Malcolm Collins: massive because it, it’s something that you... I, I wasn’t. I was thinking of other employees. But you have done this a few times recently, and it’s a massive sin when done to yourself, because ultimately we’re all our own bosses.

And if you ever reach something and you’re just like, “I’m not sure,” then develop a heuristic for how you get to the next step when you’re not sure. It can be as simple as asking your favorite AI model.

Simone Collins: [00:47:00] Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Just go to your favorite AI model and say, or two out of three models. Go to Reality Fabricator that’s our AI site, and type in, “Hey, we have some that run, like, multiple models on a thing, X or Y, and it will run multiple models, and it’ll cross-check the answer for you for the best answer, right? Like, that’s a fun way to approach this, and you can do that, right? Like, we have the technology that you should never, ever be stuck on any question.

And this is where I’ve got annoyed at Simone when I, like, came back to her and I was like, “Okay, so where are you on X task?” And she’s like, “I got stuck at, like, stage three.” And I’m like, “Well, then go to an AI, right? Because I’m just gonna go to an AI when you kick this back to me, so why don’t you go to an AI, right?”

But oh well. This was on getting the RFAB component ready for Apple computers, which she had to do. Mm-hmm. And now it works, by the way, for Apple, for people who wanna use it for, like, coding on Apple and stuff.

Simone Collins: And to be fair, the, our third stage of doing this, I did finally get around to just doing that and not giving it back to you until it was done- [00:48:00] Yeah

no matter how many times it failed.

Malcolm Collins: But A- So ... but this is, and this is why I’m expanding the list of sins. This form of inaction is functionally as bad as sloth, and is more of a temptation for most people than sloth.

Simone Collins: Well, and, and again, like, it, I think the big theme that differentiates your sins is that you have this extra prejudice, justified, toward virtue signaling sins.

Well- Anything that, you know,

Malcolm Collins: people- The Bible had that in it. If you read the freaking New Testament like we did in the last chapter-

Simone Collins: Yeah ...

Malcolm Collins: Jesus was like, “Yeah, make sure when you’re giving money, you don’t do it in a way that is overly performative. Make sure when you’re fasting, you don’t fast in a way where other people can tell that you’re fasting.”

Mm-hmm. “Because that’s overly performative. Make sure when you’re praying, you don’t do it in a way that’s overly performative, because that’s really bad.” Like, this is made cl- this is in the spirit of what’s listed out there. It’s just not explicitly listed out so people have-

Simone Collins: Well, yeah, [00:49:00] I think it’s maybe people missed it because it’s not so explicit.

It’s more just like, “Hey, don’t be flashy when you do, when you engage in self-deprivation or, like, active acts of piety.” It doesn’t have an explicit proactive prohibition on general virtue signaling.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah.

Simone Collins: It’s just like, “Oh, when you do these things, be, be subtle about it.” Which of course, people miss that too, but this is a whole different level of stuff.

Malcolm Collins: Next sin, self-flagellation. This is when you are hard on yourself or allow yourself to experience negative emotions when in the past you acted either... It, there’s, there’s two types of self-flagellation, justified and unjustified self-flagellation. I think even justified self-flagellation is a sin, but we’ll get to how in a second, okay?

Mm. So if within any moment of your life you made a decision based on the information you had available [00:50:00] to you, and in a way that was directed towards long-term human flourishing or the good of the individual you were doing it for, like it could be how you’re raising your kids, how you’re treating your wife, anything like that, right?

And it leads to some negative outcome, right? To feel bad about that is enormously sinful, because it’s indulgence. It’s, it, it, now this is one of the hardest sins to avoid And just knowing that it is a sin, like just laying it out as a sin and talking about puritanism, I think will help people better categorize these emotions and compartmentalize these emotions so they do not overwhelm you, and the, the weighted emotion of them doesn’t overwhelm you.

But when, when is it actually justified to feel bad? When you acted in a way historically where you’ve had full access to information or with the information you had at the time, and you acted in a way that was not in accordance with that information or that was designed not [00:51:00] for long-term human flourishing, but for some personal benefit.

This is where, you know, you knew you probably shouldn’t have gotten that fancy car when finances were tight, but you really wanted to show off to people, so you got the car even though it had no functional utility to your family. And now your family’s suffering for that You have permission to take time to meditate on those past failings so you don’t do them in the future, but to not overindulge.

This should not be more than 10 minutes of emotion, okay? You need to move past this, and- Yeah ... since you have created a scenario for yourself, all you can do is move forwards. The only iteration of yourself that you can do good for are iterations of yourself that have yet to come to exist. And you are suffering or living a life of rewards for the actions of past iterations of yourself.

And this is how Simone [00:52:00] sees sort of actions. Like we’re a constantly changing and new person with every moment, with every second of the day, and you’re constantly paying it forward to the future you.

Simone Collins: Yeah. Well, and are you... Is, is this iteration of you that is acting right now, that you’re consciously experiencing going to be, going to go down in history as like a war criminal in your massive army of instances, or a hero that did something good, that moved you all in a good direction?

Yeah. You have a chance to be a hero. You have a chance to be, you know, a mutineer. What are you gonna do? And then

Malcolm Collins: the next one here is a fun one. The indulgence of sin. The indulgence- Whoa ... of sin is the sin of for no reason other than to test yourself or because you think you are honing yourself and making yourself stronger you needlessly expose yourself to temptation.

So an example of this would be... Now, this isn’t [00:53:00] normal, daily sorts of temptations. Like TV, erotic images, all of these things, they’re going to be all around you in modern society. You do have to be able to resist them to live a normal life, right? To not crash out. The people who crash out at the slightest exposure to one of these things, when people are like, “What if my kid sees X online?”

And I’m like, bro, if, if your kid loses it to like something that every kid is going to see within 10 minutes of opening the internet your kid’s probably in a pretty bad place in terms of how you structured their value system and the rules that you laid out for them. So, a- a good example of this for someone like myself could be you don’t have the same temptations that I have.

You don’t live with the same temptations that I live with. But naltrexone, an opioid agonist I take daily which prevents me from feeling my opioid pathways, which makes it much harder for addictive things to get their hooks into me. I could, if I wanted to, just be like... And, and some Christians are like this.

They’re like, “Oh, [00:54:00] don’t, you know, blunt yourself to the temptation,” right? Like, “That’s a bad thing.” And it’s like, why not? Like, when I have the technology to do this, I should do it. If a person knows that they heavily struggle with alcohol in a way that’s gonna cause them to die or something like that having a fully stocked liquor cabinet is not a moral necessity for them.

Yet in terms of the temptations that Christians expose themselves to, I have noticed some think it’s, like, cool or something to do this, right? It’s not cool. It leads to long-term negative consequences. The only types of exposure that you need to make sure you’re okay with is the types of exposure that you’re going to experience anyway.

And, and that can be tied to recreational sins that you’ve accepted. So an example of this can be, I believe playing video games is sinful in that it is an indulgence that doesn’t move human society forwards, but I [00:55:00] think I would, like, mentally break down if I didn’t have any recreational time.

So, and note I often play video games while I’m working. My normal way to play video games is while I have an episode running so that I’m editing it, right? You know, so I even try to do it, like, while I’m doing something else. Or when I watch anime, I’m often vibe coding, right? Like, I try to... But these are still sinful.

I could be more focused, for example.

Simone Collins: So I- That’s about balancing your efficacious pursuit of your values with whatever it is that keeps you happy and motivated and productive. And sometimes our long-term values when we pursue them are so abstracted and sort of built on delayed gratification that the bodies we’ve evolved to live in can’t really keep us motivated.

Like, we have to create mini games- Right ... to like, to trick our bodies into keep going.

Malcolm Collins: Video games are a sin that I’m like, I will take that sin because I know that it doesn’t like consume my entire life, right? Like video games and [00:56:00] anime do not consume my entire life and so I am able to engage with them in a way that I can’t engage with, for example, alcohol when I’m off naltrexone.

And I think many people can relate to pornography in this way. Some people can engage with pornography in a way that’s just totally like, oh, a once a week thing or something like that, right? Whereas other people it’s like, they see it and now it’s all they can think about, right? If you’re the type of person where you see it and now it’s all you can think about, maybe don’t put horny pictures of women all over your house, right?

Like, if you’re the type of person that struggles with gambling, maybe don’t live right next to a casino, right? , And as Luna’s pointed out, it’s gotten a lot harder with these online betting sites and stuff like that. I, I think of all of the sins of modern society, gambling is the worst. So be aware of that if you have it.

The reason why I think it’s the worst is it is one of the only sins that can destroy your life and the life of everyone around you in like 10 minutes. Very few sins even like a heroin addiction typically takes, I don’t know, six months or [00:57:00] something, right? Like, but gambling, that’s like just over.

Generational wealth can be gone. So it’s something that I think that people should never engage with. Gambling is one of those things where it’s one of the, the things where it’s like, “Okay, when I’m choosing the sins that I choose to indulge in, which one should I just not do?” Gambling is like the easiest one.

Okay?

Speaker 6: One I’d add here that actually came from a recent episode when, , I was talking to Simone and we were like, “Well, they didn’t even end up enjoying the gang bang that they went to.” And she goes, “Well, you know, maybe they went just to see if they would like going.” And I said, “But I don’t wanna know whether or not I like gang bangs.”

Like, I can tell as an outsider I don’t. I do not like seeing other men naked, , or having... It’s eh. But if, if I was genuinely uncertain, I still would not want to know because even if I was a completely indulgent person who just, you know, did things like gang bangs recreationally, they still take a lot of effort, carry a lot of risk, everything like that.

And so I think we should [00:58:00] also just outline as a sin going out and doing something just to see if you like it when

It would be a net negative to your life to find out you like that thing. , This includes things like skydiving, free climbing, gang bangs, , gambling is an easy one here. N- you know, never be like, “Oh, well, I went to gamble to see if I enjoyed it.” You know, “I tried heroin to see if I enjoyed it.” Just don’t do it

Malcolm Collins: Next, empty words. So empty words, the sin of empty words, is when a person is trying to engage, or you’re trying to engage, because sins, our own sins are the ones that matter the most. When you’re trying to engage somebody else in c- a conversation that doesn’t either entertain them or move their ideas forwards or share information with them, or develop your and their understanding of the world, morality, science, et cetera.

All [00:59:00] conversations and all words should have some purpose. Now, it could be to make them happy. It could be a joke or something like that. But when you come to somebody and you say something like, “Here are the things I did today,” and that’s not relevant to them, you have stolen a portion of their, their life.

You have fracturally murdered that person. Worse are empty words that are designed to try to bring another person down to your negative emotional state. This is like compounding, where you come to a person and you tell them about something negative that happened to you to try to pass on- Like venting,

Simone Collins: complaining, trauma dumping

Malcolm Collins: All of that is horrible, a horrible sin.

You are trying to offload your trauma, your pain to another person. You can say, “Well, what if you need to talk about a trauma to get over it?” It’s like, you don’t need to. If you just don’t contextualize it as traumatic, the studies have shown you won’t experience it as traumatic. We always talk about this study, but there’s a famous study where they looked over people’s [01:00:00] experiences of trauma in youth, and they correlated their stated experiences of trauma in youth correlated with their negative behavioral patterns as an adult, their m- mental stress as an adult, everything like that.

But when they went over the court records to see who really experienced trauma and who didn’t, completely dis-correlated from anything as an adult. People who experienced demonstrable trauma, like I would be someone like that. If you look at my childhood, it was horrifying. Like we’re actually talking with a, a, a team that’s like doing research on us, and I’m going through my childhood, and they were like, “Wait, that sounds horr- f- like why aren’t you more focused on that as a traumatic event?”

And I say, “Because how does that help me to be?” There would be a pure negative externality to everyone around me Next. And, and this is a big one, and I really encourage people to, one, look for it in themselves and look for it in their partners, right? If you, if you’re in a techno-puritan relationship, work on this, right?

Next, unnecessary status signaling. Easy, I [01:01:00] probably shouldn’t even need to say it but all status signaling is sinful, right? Except for when it is necessary for, like, a job or something like that. And be very careful you don’t use lies about what you say is necessary to indulge in status signaling that isn’t actually necessary.

You, for almost no job do you actually need anything other than a bare bones car, right? For example. And yet many people buy... And, and a used bare bones car. Will buy fancy things that they simply do not need. In the same category as status signaling is the sin of in-group signaling. This is signaling how punk you are, how goth you are, how whatever in-group you want to accept you.

Even how techno-puritan you are to other techno-puritans. It is when you engage in this signaling in a way that hurts your long-term goals and ability to affect society. So an example might be a face tattoo or something like that. Even if there was a techno-puritan [01:02:00] face tattoo you could get, it would be strictly sinful to get it because it would lower your efficaciousness in society

Speaker: I talked it over with Simone to think if there’s any sins that we’re missing here, and we came up with a few more. First is the sin of entitlement. This is to believe that you are owed anything by either other people or reality itself. Be that dignity, a good life, healthcare, being treated with respect.

No one is owed anything, and to believe you are is a grave sin. Second is the sin of indulgent nostalgia. This is allowing nostalgia to indulge rumoration rather than focusing on trying to recreate those sorts of experiences for the next generation in which case it can be good.

The final is rumination more broadly, just the sin of rumoration. This is overly [01:03:00] focusing or giving weight to any emotion that you are feeling that you didn’t choose to feel. This, like as Simone put it when we were walking this morning, she goes, “Today people will be like, ‘I’m sad. That means I should do something about it.

I should take pills or something,’ when really it’s just not particularly relevant how you feel. It’s usually not particularly relevant to what you need to accomplish or what you need to do

The final one I’d include here is one of the biggest potential sins, is risking a human’s life for happiness or a thrill or for some emotional subset. , This could be, you know, recreational sex is one thing that could cause a human life to come into existence, and then you feel put in a position where abortion makes sense to you.

But this also includes things like skydiving, bungee jumping, free climbing, anything where you are putting your own life at risk meaninglessly for just a thrill

Malcolm Collins: Next, corrupted [01:04:00] mercy.

And this is the biggest, and we can get to this another day because it goes long, this section. We’re gonna be talking about the Bible in a place where I’m just gonna say the Bible needs to be updated on this point. There are many places in the Bible where it explicitly says “Give food to the poor.

Yes, even foreigners. Yes, don’t let that trouble you.” And I think that that made sense morally as we talk about, like, things in the Bible, the Bible in the past said, “Sell your daughter. This is how you sell your daughter into sex slavery. This is how, you know, you treat your slaves. This is h- how- how you act when you conquer a people and have to slaughter all their infants,” right?

You know, all of those things, right? Those th- those parts of biblical morality have changed as society has changed,

Speaker 13: And this isn’t because the underlying morality of the Bible has changed. The goals of all of these have always been the same. The iterative change to human civilization they’ve made have always been the [01:05:00] same. , But it’s because humanity and the way that we live has changed, and that has changed the rules that are best to live by to live a virtuous life within the social norms of your era

Malcolm Collins: and I think that this is one area where we need to look at what’s in the Bible, and I’d actually say we... There’s no way around this. There’s no linguistic way around this. We just need to accept that in the time of Jesus and in the time of the Old Testaments, there was not enough charity in the world to the extent that people were suffering, and so the Bible had to signal boost charity.

But today, we live in a time where charity has reached such an extreme that it is leading to more aggregate suffering. Oh. And we will get to that next. Oh, that might actually make a whole other tract. We’ll do a whole other tract on that.

Simone Collins: Oh, that’s a good idea. Well, useful stuff. We need to write this down in,

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, he can try it for an hour now. Won’t that be fun?

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: I, I mean, remember, while the Bible tells you to be merciful, it also says, “Be merciful just as your father is merciful.” [01:06:00] And keep in mind that God did punish a guy by taking away his title as king because he didn’t kill literally everyone in a settlement, even though he did kill all the babies.

He did that part. Didn’t kill everyone. So, whatever is meant by mercy here is not the standard definition of mercy, and that’s worth meditating on as we go into this next section. Love ya, Simone.

Simone Collins: I love you, too

Speaker 16: What do you think? Look, a dinosaur. It’s a dinosaur. Are the kids going to survive? I don’t know. What is gonna happen, Indy?

Is Vatican II the result of a “gay Jew infiltrating the Catholic Church”? Malcolm and Simone Collins dive deep into the shocking story of Gregory Baum — a matrilineal Jew, former Catholic priest, and openly gay man who authored the first draft of Nostra Aetate, one of the most controversial documents of the Second Vatican Council.

In this episode, they explore:

• Baum’s background, conversion, active homosexuality while writing key Church documents, and later life

• The content and lasting impact of Nostra Aetate on Catholic teaching regarding Jews, other religions, and interfaith dialogue

• Why many traditional Catholics view Vatican II with deep suspicion

• The broader implications for Church authority, doctrine, and demographics

A wild, uncomfortable, and thought-provoking discussion on faith, identity, institutional capture, and theology. What do you think — infiltration, urban monoculture influence, or something else?

Watch until the end for Malcolm & Simone’s unfiltered reactions.

Episode Transcript

Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone. If you clicked on this video and are wondering, is this a clickbait title? It is so much crazier than you think, right? So I saw a title going through on a Redeem Zoomer video. We’ve had him on the show. I think he’s a great content creator, but he’s a pretty small C conservative content creator.

Doesn’t really lean into c- clickbait. Generally tries to dig into the meat and bones of religious history, Christian history, and theology. And it was the, the gay Jew who infiltrated Catholicism or the Vatican or something like that. Anyway, I read this and I was like, “Wh- this isn’t normal Redeem Zoomer content,” right?

It mu- it can’t possibly be true, Malcolm. I start listening to the video. I get to the end of it and I’m like, “Oh, my God, I have to know more.” So I need to clarify a few things about this particular individual and the influence they have had on Catholicism. [00:01:00] First of all is this somebody who was just, like, same sex attracted or, you know, not, not actually sleeping with men?

Or maybe they, long after writing the documents that became important parts of Vatican II Nostra A- aetera m- they, they maybe long after had gay sex or started doing gay activism or something like that. They were, while they were a priest, during the time period they wrote these documents, having active gay sex with men Yeah and

Simone Collins (2): then it’s like- Wait, whoa, whoa, whoa, hold, hold on.

You, how can you be a Catholic priest and a, I mean, I guess you could be a ma- a matrilineal Jew And that’s the other, right, so here’s

Malcolm Collins: another thing. I was like, maybe they’re just ethnically Jewish or something like that. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Yeah, yeah. No, they’re probably not actually a

Simone Collins (2): Jew. They’re just matrilineally, ooh, matrilineally Jewish, and that’s it, right?

Yeah, so- And then that would be-

Malcolm Collins: He is, by the way, matrilineally [00:02:00] Jewish. His, one of the things he fought hardest to normalize within the Vatican and Catholicism as a policy is that it is immoral to attempt to proselytize to and convert Jews to Christianity. Does that sound a lot like somebody who actually deconverted from Judaism?

That makes no sense if you actually believe Christian principles, right? Like, you would... I’m, I’m saying this, I’m trying to be, like, as... I have, I have tackled this particular conundrum every way I can in my head, and the only way, because then, like, wouldn’t he convert back to Judaism?

But the only way I can get it to make sense when I piece together his various writings, and then it does make sense, is he thinks that, that the [00:03:00] Jews are still under the first covenant. And that as such, you can have a b- believe that the Jewish worldview is both 100% correct and accurate, and the Christian worldview is simultaneously 100% correct and accurate. Because the first covenant stands and you have the second covenant. And so he basically, I mean, if this is true, it means that he 100% believed in, even if he was telling the truth about being a Catholic, Catholicism and Judaism.

Or a form of Catholicism that’s heavily different from other forms of Catholicism, because now we’re gonna get to, what did he write? So he wrote Nostra Aetate. This is an official declaration of the Second Vatican Council. It was overwhelmingly approved with a final vote of 2,021 in favor and only 88 against, and it was promulgated or officially issued by Pope Paul VI on October [00:04:00] 28th, 1965.

What that means in terms of Catholic doctrine is that’s not the same thing as a papal bull, right? Like, it doesn’t mean that it directly came from God. But what it does mean, according to the catechism of the Catholic Church, or, like, their official documents about what all Catholics have to do, is Catholics, quote-unquote, “owe it religious assent or a sincere submission of intellect and will.”

See CCC 892 to 893. It is not optional. And I will read through that, the, like, official Catholic doctrine on these types of policies. But what it said and what it introduced to Catholicism as a concept is that other religions, including religions outside of the Abrahamic tree, like Hinduism and Buddhism, have a ray of divine truth to them.

And it’s even written ... It can be interpreted, like now, [00:05:00] after I went over this document, I understand now why so many of our Catholic friends hate Vatican II. ‘Cause I’m reading this and I’m like, “Whoazers.” Like, this is pretty wild. And it, it goes through and sort of praises things about other major religions and sort of creates commandments, essentially, for Catholics around getting along with them rather than necessarily trying to convert them.

That’s crazy. Very

convenient if a Jew had entered the, the, the Catholic Church. Okay. By the way, other final crazy thing is he also deconverted- Oh ... from

Simone Collins (2): Catholicism. So he, like, came in, vandalized church policy, and then- Vandalized church

Malcolm Collins: policy in a very d- and note, when I say he wrote the Nostra E- Eleata this document- It’s not like he co-wrote it or something like that.

He wrote the entirety, as far as church history and anyone is aware- Okay ... of the first [00:06:00] draft of this document. How- Yes, it was heavily edited after its first draft and before it entered the sort of church law and stuff like that. And actually, it seemed to have gotten even worse in future edits. In his original writing of it, it was really just focused on Jews and Christians getting along and Judaism being partially true.

Okay. And all of the, like, Hinduism and Buddhism stuff was added by other people afterwards. Oh, wow. So, like the his, his group of buddies- It was the ‘60s. It was the time. Yeah but the reason he left was also crazy. So within the church and during his time in the church, he was a well-known LGBT activist.

Oh. And he left the church, and we’ll go into that because as he said the, the, the, the church’s stance on gays. Which is odd because one he... If- he was a priest. He’s not, in C- Catholic terms at least, it’s, that, that doesn’t [00:07:00] just mean you can’t sleep with women. You can’t sleep with anyone as a Catholic priest.

Yeah. Right? Like- Yeah ... their stance on gays had nothing to do with the fact that he couldn’t sleep with men. Yeah, it’s, it’s about

Simone Collins (2): celibacy. It’s not about selective celibacy.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, although he was doing that anyway. Well. He ends up, by the way, long-term dating another Catholic priest who is gay or former Catholic priest who is gay.

Simone Collins (2): Oh, I just, no, I just want the yaoi manga version of this. After leaving- It sounds fantastic.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Y- you know how G- oh, you wanna get even more manga? Do you know who he’s married to today?

Simone Collins (2): Neil deGrasse Tyson.

Malcolm Collins: I don’t know. Who? What? An ex-Catholic nun.

Simone Collins (2): God, you said that and my, my computer just, like, demonically shut off. It, it was like- ... it wasn’t used to process that. No, it was

Malcolm Collins: an

ex-Catholic nun who he’s married to now. Oh my. Well,

Simone Collins (2): a very

Malcolm Collins: mannish

Simone Collins (2): nun perhaps.

Malcolm Collins: No, no. They don’t have any [00:08:00] sexual relationship. I think it’s so that he can more easily have both a long-term pr- relationship, which is something he’s always wanted, and practice casual sex with gay men in, in potentially large numbers.

So okay. I’ve set the scene, I think. This is absolutely crazy. I now understand why, like, all of the sane Catholics who, like, are, are our friends are all like, “Yeah, I’m not, like, a big fan of Vatican II. That... Some w- some fishy stuff went on with that,” right? And l- let’s, let’s just go into this, okay?

‘Cause it gets... , so he knew he was attracted to men in his teenage years but remained celibate during his time as a priest. Ordained in the 1950s, left the priesthood in 1974. A- and note his conversion into Catholicism is also pretty fishy. So we’ll get into that as well. In his 2016 autobiography, The Oil Has Not Run Dry, he publicly came out. He described falling in love with men [00:09:00] emotionally in his younger years. The joy mixed with pain because it couldn’t be reciprocated due to his vows. His first gay experience was at the age of 40 around 1963. This was around the age that he wrote this document which he described as exciting but ultimately disappointing because he wanted a committed partner.

After leaving the priesthood, he married Shirley Flynn, a former nun, in 1978. They lived together platonically until her death in 2007. He described continuing to explore his sexuality in other, quote-unquote, “non-conformist ways.” In 8- 1986 after moving to Montreal, he fell in love with a former priest, a male partner, and remained committed to that relationship.

Now, this is also pretty interesting because that’s a huge age gap relationship there

Simone Collins (2): on the bright side, I mean, we’ve got gay romance, we got the costumes, we got the age gap. This is just perfect manga [00:10:00] fodder for some kind of priest yaoi series.

So- Yeah, this is- At

Malcolm Collins: least there’s that ... this is one of the things where if you come to the conclusion that I do in this and, and you’re watching this, that he just never stopped being Jewish I’m not getting the Jewishness in any of this, though. I... Where is, where

Simone Collins (2): is the Jew coming in? We haven’t, we haven’t gotten to that yet.

Okay. Because I, I’m not... None of this feels like someone who’s very Jewish. It just, it just feels like someone who’s kind of trolling the church,

Malcolm Collins: having fun. But if you, if you... No, suppose you are an actual Jew, right? Now- Okay ... keep in mind, Jews aren’t supposed to be gay either, so, like, he’s not good at being a Jew in that

Simone Collins (2): respect.

Well, like, again, to my point. Now, this doesn’t sound like a Jew. This sounds like m- maybe someone a little bit ur- ur- early urban monoculture or someone very 1960s-ish, just like, “Free love. Everything is real. God comes in many forms.” That kind of person. [00:11:00] There’s nothing particularly Jewish about that.

That has to do with a loss of culture, a loss of tradition. Mm-hmm

Malcolm Collins: No, but imagine you’re, you’re Jewish, right? Even a bad Jew. I, I, I still think even as a bad Jew, even with that level of sin- God, Jew ... this is one of those, like, sneak stat things where I often joke that, that Jews are just specced into, like, way too high a sneak stat.

They, they, it’s not just they come off as sneaky, it’s the fact that, that Mossad has been able to pull off these insane things like getting terrorists to pay them for pagers to blow- I love that,

Simone Collins (2): yeah. And most recently there’s been this big scare with Mossad being a little bit too socially connected with a lot of high-ranking Trump officials, and they’re sending all this intel back on what internally the US government is talking about vis-a-vis the Iran war.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, but imagine the civilization level sneak stat that is to sneak your way into- Into everything ... the core council which decides [00:12:00] what is religiously true for Catholics.

Simone Collins (2): Okay, okay. So he’s, he’s Mossad-ing the Catholic Church is what you’re trying to say. Infecting

Malcolm Collins: it with documentation that says you’re not allowed to go against the Jews.

That’s not even, like... That’s not even, like... I’m just like, “

Simone Collins (2): Damn.” Really? Isn’t that just, isn’t that what he wrote more just, like, let’s try to be more cooperative and kind vis-a-vis other religions? Or is it- no,

Malcolm Collins: it basically affirms Judaism is, is partially true and worshiping the same god. Well, it is the sa- I mean, they, they share the Old Testament.

Yeah, but m- most Catholics before Vatican II did not think Jews were worshiping the same god. That is... E- even the concept of that is really a post-Vatican II concept. Well, Jews worship

Simone Collins (2): the God of the Old Testament and

Malcolm Collins: Christians worship the God of the Old Testament. I know that makes sense to you as a techno-puritan because we believe the same thing.

Okay. I am just saying that most Christians don’t believe that. [00:13:00] They do believe- I guess someone’s

Simone Collins (2): gonna explain this to me in the comments, so yeah. Okay. Fine. I’ll take, I’ll take your word for it and then go to the comments.

Speaker: So I decided to look more into this to see how popes after it was out related to it, and it looks like they’ve just built on it since then. , You have Pope Paul VI, who was the one who

, Put the whatever on it, the, the, the seal on it. Then you’ve got Pope John Paul II, who frequently referenced and built upon it. Examples include addresses at an anniversary, specifically his 20th address in 1985, his 1986 visit to the Rome Synagogue, and multiple statements on Jewish-Christian relations.

Um, then you have , Pope Benedict XVI, who wrote a letter for the 40th anniversary in 2005, praising it for opening a new era. So he explicitly praised it in relation with Jews and overcoming prejudices. As both cardinal and pope, he affirmed its role while noting some limitations, e.g.

[00:14:00] it focuses positively on religion, but should address the sick and distorted forms of those religions. Okay, whatever. , Pope Francis marked the 50th anniversary, 2015, in a general audience, calling the message, quote unquote, “always timely,” and quoting sections on Judaism and Islam, and emphasized practical dialogue, friendship, and cooperation in the document.

Then we have Pope Leo XIV, who recently gave an address to a general audience for the 60th anniversary, highlighting its ongoing urgency for Jewish-Catholic relationships. So, , what I’ll note here is, yes, none of these are like papal bulls or anything like that, but for half a century at this point, well over half a century at this point, , every single pope has reaffirmed and built on this document.

, This inception was deep and thorough

Malcolm Collins: It looks like the age gap might’ve been around, like, 25 years for one of his relationships. Ooh.

Simone Collins: Well, I mean, you know, they’re very common these [00:15:00] days, so.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. So we’ll start with his sexuality stuff, then we’ll get into the Jew stuff.

But that is, that is fas- ... And it makes me understand more why we see so many of the Catholics who do not think the church is, is, as it exists right now, is something that they can follow.

Mm.

And they’ve gone for other versions or sort of past iterations of what the church taught. And it’s always fascinating to me that they don’t consider themselves schismatic.

Although, what’s really funny is a lot of the, like, most famous schismatics, like Martin Luther, also didn’t want to consider themselves a schismatic.

Speaker 22: Other individuals who didn’t consider themselves schismatic were John Calvin and

Henry VIII and John Wycliffe. I personally don’t understand this. You know, now that Protestantism is large, maybe it’s just twisted my brain on this issue,

Malcolm Collins: So, like, th- that’s just a common thing that happens to people, where you have this sort of trans-schismatic take, where it’s like, “I don’t define myself as schismatic, and I’m just looking at the guy in a wig.”

And I’m like, “But [00:16:00] you’re, you’re clearly just a guy in a wig,” right? Like, you’re ignoring the church’s teachings, right? You know, that seems ... But anyway, to continue here. And, and I think that at the end of the day, whether or not you’re schismatic or not does actually come from whether or not you define yourself as schismatic.

I actually buy into the, the trend thing of schism- schismatism, because you at the end of the day get to decide, you know, what your heart thinks, right? So even if I as an outsider would be like, “This looks schismatic to me,” they as, those insiders wouldn’t, right? So to continue there. He knew he was attracted to men in his teenage years but remained celibate during that time as a priest, and he used priesthood to sort of, this was part of what seemed to motivate him to become a priest, the ability to live a celibate lifestyle and, and not be drawn to this. In his 2016 autobiography, The Oil Has Not Run Dry, so keep in mind this stuff about who he’s sleeping with and when he’s sleeping with them is not coming from outside hostile sources.

This is from his own mouth. Talk about this. Oh, sorry, we just ... Wait, wait, did we just go through [00:17:00] this? Yeah, we went through his first sexual experience and stuff like that. He described wanting to explore se- his, his sexuality in non-conformist ways. So anyway, th- this is where it gets interesting, right?

So, remember I mentioned wh- when his sexual experience was, right? So, that would’ve happened when he was 40 years old, okay? Oh. So the document by the pope, right? With officially promulgated, that means this is when the pope, you know, basically affirmed this document, when he was 42 years old.

He apparently wrote the first draft of the document when he was 38 years old, and would have been working on the inter-drafting process during this time when he was having se- gay, gay sex.

Right? Mm.

So to get some quotes from him “Looking back, I begin to realize my vow of celibacy had not been a meaningful religious commitment, but simply a promise to bracket my homosexuality, to refuse to [00:18:00] explore its meaning and power.”

He decided to leave the priesthood since, quote, “Since I no longer agreed with the church’s official sexual ethics and was exploring my sexuality in non-conformist ways.” Oh, no. A- again, wait, you left the church to explore your sexuality in non-conformist ways? My brother, straight men don’t get to do that either.

Like, the level of this guy’s commitment to the church, not high. You know? That is

Simone Collins (2): a little... Yeah. Ugh.

Malcolm Collins: And this is actually something really weird about Catholicism that I’m beginning to notice. And I notice this from his writings on Catholicism, the way he re- relates to Catholic theology, is a lot of people who are at, like, controlling levels within the Catholic Church and Catholic religious orders are significantly less religiously faithful than I’d say, like, the average lay Catholic that I know.

Mm. And that’s been very, very surprising to [00:19:00] me. And I- Well,

Simone Collins (2): there’s also such this... It is a little something that I struggle with with the c- the Catholic Church is the lifestyle, the day, just the day-to-day routine of someone who is in the clergy is so different from the day-to-day routine of a layperson who’s really deeply engaged in all the sacraments, right?

‘Cause you’re looking at one life that has possibly a lot of solitude, you know, a lot of sort of communal living sort of like a university style living if you are, you know, in a group, or more isolated living, very independent. Versus, you know, a teeming family, lots of young kids running around, lots of...

I mean, obviously priests work closely with their community too. It’s just, it, it worries me that... And what I like about the LDS church, for example, is that the people who are involved in policy are people who are, they came from the church. They raised families. They, they’ve done the whole thing. They’re living the LDS life, or they lived the [00:20:00] LDS life and now they’re older and senior and, and now influencing it and trying to make it sustainable and good, presumably.

Yeah. But if you’re a Catholic priest, you’ve never done that. Like, you haven’t had the family. You haven’t raised the kids. You don’t know the challenges of raising a kid in the church in the modern day. Well, then why

Malcolm Collins: do you think, like, Catholics have such low fertility rates when contrasted with other groups?

Simone Collins (2): I mean, it’s, it can’t help. There, there are so many factors, but yeah. I, it... So when, when you say, you know, you, you don’t see such great adherence from The clergy, well, can you be surprised when the clergy don’t really live the life of the layperson? They can’t, because they can’t be married. They can’t have kids.

They can’t raise children within the church. Yeah, but is it- They instead... It’s kind of like how, something I’ve noticed, and this, like in a very different world, there’s a lot of childless women who worked as nannies or as teachers. Mm. And they’re like, “Well,” you know. And they, they sort of act like they know really well.

Like, “I know how a child should be raised. I know [00:21:00] all these things.” But they, they never really have lived it, right? They’ve only been, like, paid staff who work with children under certain conditions. But they don’t know the full experience of it, and then they’re very judgmental around, like, parents and parenting and how a child should be raised, even though they don’t know what it’s like to be on the hook 24/7.

And I think there might be a similar dynamic that takes place with, like, a full-time clergy who’s not allowed to engage in the sacrament of having kids and getting married because they’re viewing it from a limited perspective that makes them think like they fully understand the experience when they really can’t.

Does that

Malcolm Collins: make sense? Well, it’s also one of the things that was increasingly clear to me as I studied this guy’s life is he seemed to do very little for, like, actually... Like, if you look at his writings and stuff like that they predominantly seem tied to gay activism, right? Like- Mm ... it almost seems like he was living off of Catholic tithings while spending his day and nights promoting, like, because he just had, you know, you have time to think in free time when you’re doing something like this [00:22:00] promoting gay stuff.

Hmm.

And that seems to be a, a big way that, like, the, the sort of gayness became more normalized within the church was specifically downstream of him. But to continue here. And, and gayness is super normalized in the Catholic Church to the extent that we’ve pointed out, there’s even an article on, like, the gayness of Catholic priests where it’s argued between 25, from surveys, 25 and 50% of gay, Catholic priests are same-sex attracted.

Which isn’t a, a ding on them. I mean, we often say this is actually kind of a, an ethical way for society to deal with same-sex attraction. Absolutely. If it, if, if you know, it’s saying you can’t participate in it, you know, at least use these people like ethically sourced eunuchs so you can get people without as much nepotism to have positions of authority within your religious institutions, right?

Like, but that’s also gonna make them, like, way more open to these ideas and in an environment where people are skirting around these ideas. And I think that this might be where the normalization- Mm ... especially in the heart of the [00:23:00] Catholic Church, of trying to cover up the child, the ev- everybody knows what scandal I’m talking about.

I guess I’ll put a line from South Park here.

Speaker 2: Why would he put anything in your butts? We don’t know. That’s what we’re trying to figure out. Hmm.

Hmm. Hello there, children. Chef, why would a priest want to stick up my butt? Goodbye.

Speaker 7: Now I want to be clear that the Catholic institution, , was committing these SA attempts at lower rates than other large institutions like the US public school system, , by pretty significant margins. , But that doesn’t explain why they tried to cover it up, like up to the highest levels of the church, and put people in positions where they could continue to do this even after the coverup.

Like, if you’re gonna do a coverup for reputation, at least keep the people away from kids afterwards

Speaker 23: It was almost as if, or at least in terms of how they were acting, that they thought the mere fact that people were [00:24:00] upset , at them for sleeping with children was the problem. , And I think we even see how the sentiment could potentially arrive through individuals like Milo Yiannopoulos, where he originally said that this was like a sexual awakening for him, , when a, a priest, , hooked up with him as a kid.

, And that others may feel that way as well, and like the outside world just doesn’t understand. It’s, I don’t know, one potential perspective?

Speaker 24: Like, okay, so bear with me here, but suppose you’re like Milo, and you were molested as a young person, but you felt it very affirming for whatever reason, Stockholm Syndrome, whatever, or even j- you actually did feel it affirming. It was like an important awakening for you. And then other, you see other people doing the same thing to other children, and you then, , see them being punished for it, and you would think, “Oh, well this doesn’t make sense.”

Look, just, I as an outsider am trying to find any logical reason why a good [00:25:00] person would do this, and maybe Catholics can chime in and explain why they think that the church may have been covering this up in the way that they were covering it up, where it allowed the people who were doing it to keep doing it

Speaker 16: This year, we’re taking the boys on a weekend boat trip to discuss Jesus’ role as the navigator of our lives. That sounds pretty fun.

Speaker 17: A Catholic boat trip?

Speaker 18: The Catholic boat’s gonna be heading on out today. The Catholic boat, get some hot Christian action that’ll take you-

Malcolm Collins: but uh

The, the, it’s always really perplexed me, like why did they not, why, why were they trying to protect these priests, right? When, when they were like moving around the priests that they knew were the issues instead of dealing with them. Like it- I, I always thought like there must be some form of normalization that [00:26:00] I’m not aware of.

Then I read this guy’s writings in daily life and I’m like, “Oh, if there are a bunch of priests like this guy, that explains it.” There, there’s basically a What do you call it? A gay cult that has infiltrated the upper rings of the Catholic Church, the Vatican, right? Like,

Speaker 4: No, to keep their mouths shut. Right. Yep. Right. And so... W- wait a minute. What? Yes, but we’ve got to find out why these children are suddenly finding it necessary to report that they’re being molested. Stop the problem at its source. Yes

Malcolm Collins: what, that’s, that’s what. Yeah, everyone he’s married to and having sex with after he left was a former priest.

Mm.

Simone Collins (2): It doesn’t look great that that happened, yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Okay.

Simone Collins (2): And- Or, or it just means that when people realize they can’t adhere to the values and rules of the church, they leave, which could be a sign that those who remain are being pretty good. I don’t, I’m, I don’t know, just maybe, maybe. Right? That could be...

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. So, and note here, this episode, people might be like, “Malcolm, like, this seems [00:27:00] like an area where you could really dunk on Catholicism. Like, why aren’t you taking the shots here, bro? Like, we all know you want to.” And this is one of those, oh, no, no, no, no, no. Like, this is too bad even for me. Like, I’m like, I feel bad about this.

I would like, learning this history, it wasn’t like... It was almost like a curse to knowledge for me because like, oh. Like, this is, this is not fun to know happened to your religion, right? Like, this is, this is too much of a, this is like, you know, you don’t like the other team, but then you see them do so bad in a particular game that they just get completely owned.

Mm ... and they’re, they’re walking off the field and you’re just like, “I’m, I’m, I’m sorry that happened to you guys. That was painful to watch.” Which is what learning the story of this guy has been in terms of, like, my thoughts on the Vatican.

Mm.

But to continue here a- and note here, I’m not saying this ‘cause I’m anti-Jewish or anti-gay.

Like, everybody if this guy was secretly a Jew, right, [00:28:00] like, dang. Right? Like I’m, I’m just sort of, like we all should be advocating for our own group. This is, this is where, you know, when somebody sees a Jew say something like, “Well, you know, I support Israel over the United States.” And people are like, “Oh, can you believe they...”

I’m like, I mean, they’re Jewish. Y- yeah, like I support America over any other country, but I’m, I’m an American, right? You know? That’s like the core of my identity, my genetic history, my cultural history. And if I lived in, for example, Britain, I would never move to supporting Britain over America just ‘cause I had a job there.

Speaker 6: I should clarify, this is very different from supporting your own in a way that creates negative externalities, like the Jews did where the ADL ended up supporting, , in trying to de-platform that content creator who rightfully was calling out Orthodox Jewish communities for running welfare fraud, or Chabad did in getting that guy who killed a bunch of people off, or the Mormon sort of [00:29:00] cabal did around the bricks and minifigs.

Yeah, , that’s, that creates problems. But in terms of just being pro-Mormon if you’re Mormon, , and you know, saying, “Oh, I’ll hire a Mormon over a non-Mormon,” like f- of course. Of course. Why would, why would we not want... That’s presumably what we all want

I mean, in this respect, sometimes we’ll have like Jewish fans or Catholic fans who will be like, “Oh, well, I’d support America over Israel,” or, “I’d support America over the Vatican.” And I’m like, It doesn’t... I mean, I support America because I’m an American , , and my religious and cultural history is American.

If your plan is to eventually become fully American, that will eventu- I mean, intergenerationally lead to a break from your past identity. It’s not a flex to not care about protecting your people. , Your people are different from our people, and if you deny that, [00:30:00] you can. America does integrate people, but full integration, eventually means some form of true and permanent separation from whatever your original group is.

, And I think that we’re actually seeing that within portions of the American Catholic population and their relation with the Vatican right now. , It’s just w- when is this fully accepted? And, and as well as with the American, portions of the American Jewish population

Like the Jew who tells me, as some Jews have, that they would support American interests over the interests of Jews more broadly, I don’t hear that and think, “Oh, that’s super cool.” Or the, the Catholic who’s like, “I would support American interests over the Vatican interests.” I don’t hear, hear that and I’m like, “Oh, oh, oh yeah, you’re so cool.”

Like any more than like if I moved to another country, even if, even if I spent 50 or 60 years there, I wouldn’t support that country over America. And some people can move to America and become fully American. Like I think Leaflet’s a good example of [00:31:00] this. But, you know, I don’t expect that from everyone.

It’s just that when it’s clear that a person isn’t moving here for that reason, there’s probably another place where they would be better suited

Malcolm Collins: You know, that’s, it, the, the guy was playing on Team Jew, you know? His, his goal was it, you know, in- inje- inject Catholic doctrine with protect the Jews, right? And, and he achieved that. So to continue here. He also thought gays had, like, a special position in, in God’s design even when he was religious.

So here’s another quote from him. “I have asked myself, is there a special meaning in the homosexual condition? God creates the great majority of humans heterosexual and only a small minority homosexual. Is there a special task associated with the condition of this latter?” By the way, there is. It’s, it’s self-control.

But that doesn’t occur to him. An, an additional opportunity to [00:32:00] exercise self-control and an additional challenge. “Since they are an oppressed minority, aware of the hypocrisy of society and the damage done by the dominant culture, I have suggested that gays and lesbians are intended to extend solidarity to all marginalized groups and demand greater justice.

Because homosexuals are largely invisible in society, their prophetic vocation will have a cultural impact and support the struggle for human emancipation.” So, like, keep in mind that this is what this guy thought his spiritual mission to do with, like, the tithings that were supporting him. So, Simone, before I go further

Simone Collins (2): I’m just so flat.

Like, this is so Maybe this doesn’t have more people talking about it because it’s so hard to process that it actually could happen, I guess. Like, it just... Like, if you were to see a flying saucer land right in front of you, or, like, you were to [00:33:00] drive by one in a parking lot, you’d be like, “Well, I definitely didn’t see that,” ‘cause that would, that could never happen.

And so- Yeah, no, I

Malcolm Collins: actually f- y- people know me. Like, come on, this is Malcolm. He’s gonna have an anti-Catholic conspiracy rant. Like, that- Yeah, but I- ... that could work. That, that should go like butter for me.” But it’s just, like, too blatant, right? Like, it’s like you spend your whole life on alien- Yeah, like how could

Simone Collins (2): this...

My brain can’t process it. It doesn’t make sense.

Malcolm Collins: I mean, it’s, it’s like you spend your whole life on alien conspiracies, and then aliens land in your front yard with a flying saucer. They come out, and Elvis is hanging out with them, and he starts doing, like, an Elvis dance in front of you. And you’re like- Yeah, and you’re like, “

Simone Collins (2): I, I don’t know what to do with this.”

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, you’re just like, “What? What? What?” That’s, that’s not even, like, an interesting... Like, gay Jew infiltrates the Vatican and infects them with weird ideology that inverts their prior religious principles? What? No, [00:34:00] no, Malcolm. Bad Malcolm. Th- th- d- Oh, my God. But we’re gonna pull on this thread, okay? And this is also why for me and, and, a- and I’ve always said, like, this is why I really personally, when people always wonder, “Well, what’s your source of authority,” right?

Ever having a source of authority that, like, is living and not dead for me is always really difficult, because it can always just decide to disagree with you, right? Mm. Like, this isn’t just something that Catholics face. Like, suppose I’m a true believing Mormon and I truly believe everything I believe, right?

Like, and, and just like- Mm ... tomorrow the church can come out and say, “Your beliefs are officially wrong now. Update them or you’re no longer a correct Mormon.” I’d just be like, “But I really believed all of that,” right? Like, “You taught me all of that, and then I really believed it. And now all of a sudden black skin wasn’t a punishment?”

Right? Like, what, what do you mean? Right? Like, that, that [00:35:00] was- Oh, God ... that was the, the war, right? They were the people who sat out the war in heaven between Jesus and Satan, right? We, th- we, we, we, we’ve alwa- I, that, that’s not, like, tangential to my worldview. That’s a core part of my reality, right? But to continue here.

And then so I f- I, I think that the way that a lot of American Catholics have gotten around this is they sort of I think branched with, well, what the Vatican is doing largely around the second council, and now they practice something that’s, like, a- a- adjacent and may, may one day recapture the Church.

But, like, the You know. And, and if you look at current demographics, you know, th- they might... The question is, is how far does the church go before they recapture it, right? Mm. Okay. That’s another quote’s from him, ‘cause I wanna, I wanna get in his mind here, okay? “The definition of human nature tends to reflect the self-understanding of the cultural elite.”

S- So here what he’s talking about is whether or not I think [00:36:00] gayness is normal, right? And he’s trying to- Okay ... and because he believes that, like, white straight males are the cultural elite with, like, their heteronormative ideas he’s trying to argue that, like, gayness isn’t, quote-unquote, “unnatural.”

Because I w- I was trying to understand his, like, theology on this, ‘cause, like, the Bible’s pretty clear on gayness, right? And, and so therefore calling gay love unnatural is a cultural statement, is what he’s trying to argue here. Not an absolute moral one. He challenged the traditional natural law that homosexuality is inherently disordered.

So let’s, let’s go into, to what, what he, what I think he means by this. Basically when he reads in the parts of the Bible where gayness is seen as negative, he would say, “Well, that was just those cultures at that time.” And that’s where he got, you know, that’s, that’s where he’s like, “So I don’t need to follow what, what, you know, those cultures did because our church’s theology and [00:37:00] motivation has evolved since then.”

And what’s interesting is you can sort of tell under what does he think that it evolved into, it evolved into the goals of the urban monoculture. This sort of, you know, endless helping of the society’s, quote-unquote, “oppressed classes,” which, which doesn’t necessarily map onto real oppressed people, as we’ve talked about in the press.

It’s, it’s more like an urban monocultural distinction of, like, ethnically superior groups in their mind. But let’s go into the quote on what he said about Catholics and Jews, because you might think I am overstating him saying, “You’re the Catholic, you shouldn’t try to convert Jews.” He said, “After Auschwitz, the Christian churches no longer wanted to convert the Jews.

While they may not be sure of the theological grounds that dispense them from that mission, the churches have become aware that asking Jews to become Christian , is a spiritual way of blotting out their existence, and thus only reinforces the effects of the Holocaust.”

Simone Collins (2): Hold on.

[00:38:00] What? Hmm. Th- that, that, like, undermines- All of Jesus’

Malcolm Collins: teachings? All of Jesus’ stuff, yeah.

Simone Collins (2): Okay, okay. I’m not... This is like, this is, again, this is why I can’t process this. Like, how did he get this through? Like, this, it boggles the mind. Okay, well, keep going. Maybe it will start making

Malcolm Collins: sense. No, that part wasn’t in the official document, but that was something that he said in an official capacity.

Okay. We’ll get to the stuff in the document in a

bit. Okay.

Let’s talk about his conversion. So when did he convert to Catholicism? Okay. Formerly, you know, living in a, a Jewish household. He had one parent who wasn’t Jewish, though, his dad. Oh, okay. He converted at the age of 23 That is very suspicious age to convert.

Simone Collins (2): Why? I mean, isn’t that... You’re, you’re almost fully myelinated. Like, you could argue that’s your time of [00:39:00] intellectual maturity. It’s the time to really reevaluate- No, it is true- ... some of your mental religion ... most people

Malcolm Collins: convert, if they are gonna convert to a different religion, between the age of 13 and 23.

But this is also an age where if I was a Jew and sitting down and thinking like, “How could I have the most positive impact with my life for my whiter people?” Like, what’s the moonshot of moonshots, right? Like, if I could incept a group with converting Jews as equivalent to the Holocaust, and you should from a religious standpoint get along with Jews it would be the, the Vatican, right?

That, that’s, that’s the, I mean, I, I think of religious orders on Earth, it might be the largest single religious order. Because, you know, with like Islam, there’s not like, even, even if you could, there’s so many different factions. So even if you could somehow . inception.

Speaker 26: We create and perceive our world simultaneously, and our mind does this so well that we don’t even know it’s happening. That allows us to get [00:40:00] right in the middle of that process. How? By taking over the creating part. Now, this is where I need you.

Malcolm Collins: In- incep- do an inception on like a, one of the Muslim faiths, you still wouldn’t affect as many people. So just be like, “Oh, at 23 I converted.” And he said he converted after a friend gave him a copy of St. Augustine’s Confessions.

That’s a weird reason to convert. Like when people generally convert, it’s either because they’re on a mission, like actively s- seeking what they think is true. Or you know, something profound happens to them, or they see something that they think can only be described as miraculous. Like for us, or for me, the thing that really made me so fanatical in my belief was when, like literally happening through this podcast and on this podcast, is me going back to stories of the Bible that everyone in my childhood had told me they said one thing, and then I read them and they say something that is one, both completely [00:41:00] different and completely implausible that people at that period in Biblical history could have known.

D- see our Adam and Eve episode or our Genesis Confirms the Bible episode, or any, like just more broadly, I’ve been broadly shocked by how little... And so that had me sort of be like, “Okay it is miraculous to me that I could grow up next to these stories and not realize h- how sort of- correlatory they were to reality as I understood it, right?

You know, how much sense they made, the things that I thought felt unethical, like the Adam and Eve story, actually weren’t when I reread them. And that, for me, was very... That, that’s like the way a normal person converts. I read St. Augustine’s Confessions and I converted. That sounds like the type of poetic nonsense that a Catholic would buy, but I don’t really buy it myself.

But anyway what was his early work? So what were some of the first things that he started writing as soon as he got, like, officially into the Catholic [00:42:00] Church as a full-time, like, staffer, right? In 1961, he published The Jews and the Gospel, later reissued Is the New Testament Anti-Semitic. He emphasized God’s covenant with the Jewish people as valid and irrevocable, drawing from Romans 11:29, “The gifts and the call of God are irrevocable.”

The church is, quote-unquote, “incomplete without Israel” and Judaism continues as a source of divine grace, he believed. Okay, so first let’s do a, a broad g- overview of, of Nostra Aetate and then we’ll go into the various points in it. So broadly speaking, it promotes a more positive view of non-Christian religions, e.g.,

positive remarks on Hinduism, Buddhism, esteem for Muslims, stating they adore the one God. Strongly condemns antisemitism and rejects charging, quote-unquote, “all the Jews with responsibility for Christ’s passion.” Affirms God’s ongoing special relationship with the Jewish people, quote, “God holds the Jews most dear...”. So yeah [00:43:00] To keep going here, let’s get into specific authority.

And so first I wanna go into, like, how much a- a- authority does this have for Catholics, okay? It’s considered an authoritative teaching of the church. Catholics are expected to accept it with r- religious assent, the same level as most consular or papal teachings that are not defined as infallible dogma.

So, and if this isn’t infallible, but that doesn’t mean that Catholics aren’t supposed to accept it. We’ll get to the official teaching on that. It is not a dogmatic definition. Like some statements on Legent, Gitmen, and earlier councils it is as a pastoral and declarative document addressing the church’s relationships with non-Christian religions.

Catholics owe it a, quote-unquote, “religious assent or sub- sincere submission of intellect and will.” So the part of the catechism of the Catholic church, which is, like, the official things on documents of this type, by the way it says, “Divine assistance is also given to the successors of the apostates teaching in communion with the successor of Pete and in particular the way- The apostles or apostates?

Simone Collins (2): Sorry, I’m trying to keep up ... [00:44:00]

Malcolm Collins: A- apostles. Did I say apostates? Yeah. That’s quite a Freudian tip there. The, the apostles teaching in communion with the successor of Pete, and in particular way to the bishop of Rome, pastor of the whole church, when, without arriving at an infallible definition and without pronouncing an in- definable manner, they propose in the exercise of the ordinary magisterium a teaching that leads to a better understanding of Revelation in matters of faith and morals.

To this ordinary teaching and faithful are to adhere with religious assent. So this falls into the category of, to this ordinary teaching and faithful are to adhere with religious a- assent.

Mm. Which,

though distinct from the assent of faith, is nonetheless an extension of it. Because Catholics are also like, “Well, it, it, it’s not exactly like you have to assent with faith,” and it’s like that’s true, but the, this is the actual teachings of the church on this.

Mm-hmm. ‘Cause I wanted to double-check on this, ‘cause people are always like, “Oh, well, that’s, like, just a vague suggestion from the church,” and it’s like, it’s not a vague suggestion. That is not official Catholic [00:45:00] doctrine. That is a, this schismatic belief. But it’s okay, right? Like, it’s, a, a, you know, if, if you, if you believe that the church is wrong in this document too, then they’re just wrong in all the documents, right?

So, you know, we can go back to the older councils.

Speaker 21: This actually gets to me, , and I think it helps me explain to myself what’s going on better. In the same way that I get really confused when I talk to a Jew and they’re like, “Your children are Jewish,” and I’m like, “They’re like one-sixteenths Jewish.” Like, , that makes no sense to me, right? Like, I’m like, “I-- Yeah, I mean, matrilineally they’re Jewish, but they’re not...”

You know, no other culture on Earth would think of them as Jewish. But a Jew will think, an Orthodox Jew at least, “No, they are 100% Jewish.” And I just can’t understand that ‘cause I’m from a different cultural perspective. , It’s the same with Catholics, where a Catholic will be like, “Well, I’m not schismatic.”

And it’s like, “Well, you, you do disagree with the Magisterium on these issues.” And it’s like, “Well, I don’t identify as schismatic, therefore I’m not schismatic.” And I’m like, “Well, that’s not really...” And then I’m like, “Oh, I just need to see this from their [00:46:00] perspective.” And it’s not just their perspe-- it’s also the perspective of the people at the Vatican.

They also don’t see these people as schismatic. , And it’s just that I’m never gonna be able to understand what it’s like to perceive the world in this way

Malcolm Collins: Yes. Okay. So, this is also rooted... So if you wanna go to where this comes from, it comes from Vatican II’s Lumen Gentium 25, which the CCC quotes to build this out, but the quote from that is, “This religious submission of mind and will must be shown in a special way to the authentic magisterium of the Roman pontiff, even when it’s not speaking ex cathedra, that it must be shown in a way that his supreme magisterium is acknowledged with reverence.

The judgements made by him are sincerely adhered to according to his manifest mind and will.” So again, religious submission of mind and will. Okay. So now let’s get into the stuff that was updated by this document, the new parts. Okay. Yes. Thought, Simone, before we go further.

Simone Collins: Keep going. I,

Simone Collins (2): I wanna, I wanna see what the updates are.

Malcolm Collins: [00:47:00] Okay, great. Yeah. So this is in relation to Hinduism, Buddhism Muslims, et cetera. Okay? Okay. “The Catholic Church rejects nothing that is true and holy in these religions. She regards with sincere reve- reverence those ways of conduct and life, that precepts and teachings which, though different in many aspects from the ones she holds and sets forth, nonetheless offer and reflect a ray of that truth which enlightens all men.”

Hmm.

That’s crazy Um That’s, that’s completely crazy. And, and, and note here if you contrast this with previous councils, right? So we have the Council of Florence, Conte Dominio 1441, what did it say in relation to these sorts of stuff? It af- firmly believes professors and proclaims that those [00:48:00] not living within the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews, and heretics, and schismatics cannot become participants in eternal life, but will depart into everlasting fire, which was prepared for the devil and his angels.

Unless- Okay ... before the end of the same have been added to the flock. That, that seems like uncertainly a, a, a very different teaching.

Simone Collins (2): Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: The, at a, at a very different perspective, right? And I think a lot of Catholics still want to hold to that perspective. And so I, I can see why it’s becoming so popular, these sort of pseudo-schismatic branches.

So what did the document say about various specific religions, right? ‘Cause it also, like, even went so far as to start glazing individual religions. On Hinduism it says, “Thus in Hinduism, men contemplate the divine mystery and express it through inexhaustible abundance of myth and through searching philosophical in- inquiry.

They seek freedom from the anguish of [00:49:00] our human condition either through ascetical practices or profound mediation or flight to God with love and trust.” On Buddhism, “Again, Buddhism in its various forms realizes the radical insufficiency of this changeable world. It teaches in a way by which men in a devout and confident spirit may either to acquire the state of perfect liberation or attain by their own efforts or through higher help, supreme illumination.”

Simone Collins (2): No. The... I don’t know. So in the, in the Primer’s Guide to Crafting Religion, you make it pretty clear there are basically two types of religions. You can have two types of approaches to what it is required to be saved, and one is limited to atonement. You, you, you can’t save everyone, you know? Not... There are some people who are just not gonna make it, and these are kind of, in some ways, not very nice religions because they accept that you [00:50:00] can’t save everyone and some people are damned, whatever that might mean.

The two core religions which

Malcolm Collins: have this perspective are the Calvinist denominations of Protestantism of which we are one-

Simone Collins (2): Mm-hmm ...

Malcolm Collins: and the

Simone Collins (2): Jews. And then there’s the other which is a more domineering religion which believes that everyone can and should be saved. And in this way the religion is a bit unpleasant because it basically would entail, if you really wanna save everyone, coercing people to convert against their will.

And what this is trying to do is be neither. Like, it’s not like, “Well, no- no one, no one can be saved,” but it- Also, it’s not trying to save anyone. It’s just like, “Well, everyone’s kind of right,” which is kind of the worst thing. Like- Yeah ... I don’t care, do what you wanna do. It’s the absence of religion.

It’s the antithesis of Catholicism and, and any organized religion. I, I just can’t believe they... This has to- You know what I- Like, maybe someone’s gonna chime in in the comments and be like, “Oh, this is some obscure piece of writing that’s not official in any real capacity.” I, I [00:51:00] mean, could that be? Is that what’s going on here?

This was affirmed by one of the major councils and the Pope. Yeah, but is this the equivalent of, like, someone hearting something on X, you know, h- adding a heart to a post on X and not realizing- No, that’s why I

Malcolm Collins: went through the other documents that, specifically the, the Ca- catechism documents and stuff like that, so you could read before we get into this exactly the way that Catholics per previous rulings that were seen as coming directly from God- Yeah

are supposed to relate to teachings within this category, submitting

to them.

Mm. It’s, it’s not the same as having faith in, in them.

Speaker 28: By the way, I put Simone’s concerns into an AI to see what the AI would say, and it says, “Simone’s skepticism is understandable as a layperson reacting to something that feels like a massive shift, but it’s not accurate. Nostra Aetate is not some obscure low authority footnote. It’s a formal declaration of the Second Vatican Council as an [00:52:00] ecumenical council, overwhelmingly approved two thousand two hundred and twenty-one to eighty-eight, and officially promulgated by Pope Paul VI

catholic teaching, as outlined in the - Catechism of the Catholic Church, , eight nine two to eight nine three, and rooted in Lumen Gentium twenty-five, requires religious assent, a sincere submission of intellect and will to teachings from the ordinary magisterium of the ecumenical council, even when they are not infallible dogmas.

This is distinct from full assent of faith from infallible documents, but is still binding and not optional or dismissible as just a suggestion

Malcolm Collins: So this isn’t

Simone Collins (2): someone passively endorsing something without sufficiently paying attention to it or, I don’t know- Yeah ... someone just being like, “Here’s an interesting idea.

Sure, we’ll publish it,” but like, you know how The Huffington Post- No, this is- ... used to be. You know, they’d be like, “Yeah, we’ll accept your blog submission,” and they wouldn’t really, like...

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, this is very, very, very different than, say, [00:53:00] like, the Vatican wrote something in an official paper or something like that, right?

Keep in mind th- ths had to be of, of the declaration of the Second Vatican Council, so that’s a, a Vatican council, mind you. Right. This had to be voted on by the bishops, right? Who knew? Okay, wow. So

of the vote- Yeah ... of the vote 2,221 voted for it and only 88 voted against it. So it was also overwhelmingly approved. Then it was promulgated, that’s an official issue. That means review an official issue by Pope Paul VI.

I mean I, o- obviously I, I, I think that there’s a, I mean, Catholics, I, I feel like Want to say, like, and- and w- well, you know, we don’t, the real Catholics don’t take this sort of thing, and the way that those documents say you’re supposed to relate to this stuff is actually corrupted as well, and this stuff shouldn’t actually fall under that.

And I think [00:54:00] the Catholics actually have a number of outs here. There’s been a number of things in recent papal elections that could be s- considered outright fraudulent. I may do a whole episode on that at some point.

Simone Collins (2): Whoa, really? Ar- What do you mean outright? Can you g- what do you mean by outright fraudulent?

Malcolm Collins: They did some things, the Jesuits did, in how they held... It wasn’t the pope of this pope, but it was one of the previous popes, I think. Okay. Where they pulled some shenanigans that sort of prevented people from voting. Like the, the block that was against them from being there to vote. Oh, wow

Yeah. It, it was w- I, I, I can’t remember the specifics. A Catholic was the one who would, because obviously they were most invested in this when he was crashing out on me about the Jesuits and, and, and blackpilling me on the Jesuits and making me sort of see Catholicism as this fight of, like, the good guys, the Opus Dei versus the Jesuits for, like, the heart of what it becomes.

But this, the way I sort of see this right now, like a- as I’m looking at it from an outsider, is I historically, as a kid was of all the sci-fi franchises, and I was a big sci-fi nerd the one [00:55:00] sci-fi franchise I didn’t really like was Star Wars. I, I- Hmm ... I liked Star Trek over Star Wars.

Starship Troopers obviously love. SG-1- Sure ... love. Gotta do a whole video on how they canceled the SG-1 reboot because- Oh my gosh ... it treated the military too well. Oh, no. Fans might like it. It did- it didn’t make the tribals, like, better. People might like

Simone Collins (2): the military, yeah. Wait, and by the way, Stargate did not universally portray the military well.

In fact, some of the most annoying episodes were ones where they, I guess r- fairly, you know, well, not realistically, but- No, US politicians- ... give a realistic depiction of how military bureaucracy can really gunk things up sometimes.

Malcolm Collins: No, no, no, that was, those, almost every one of the episodes you’re thinking of was tied to the US Senate or Congress.

Yeah. And the military was the good guy. Oh, yeah,

Simone Collins (2): yeah,

Malcolm Collins: yeah. Okay, you’re right, you’re right. So- No, I feel like they were

Simone Collins (2): even not realistic. You know, they’re like, “What? There are some problems that the military faces.” The, the point

Malcolm Collins: here being is despite me not being a Star Wars fan- Okay ... watching Disney buy Star Wars and then start to just write, like, “We hate you” in [00:56:00] poo all over the walls of the property made me genuinely sad, right?

Reading this feels a bit like watching the new Disney Star Wars where it’s like- Hmm ... yeah, I might not have been the biggest fan of that property, but like, why’d you have to do them that dirty, right? Like, and, and as a Star Wars fan, I feel it’s, it’s probably pretty similar to being, like, a Catholic today, where it’s like, well, you know- None of the real fans actually take those new ones and consider them canon, right?

We’re still all about legends over here. What, what are you talking about? Yeah, we’re, we’re

Simone Collins (2): in this for the long run. It’ll, it’ll come around

Malcolm Collins: again. Yeah, we’re, we’re... Everybody knows Disney’s eventually gonna realize this didn’t work, as I’ve heard rumors that they’re thinking about doing an, and retconning it.

So we’re, we’re gonna get a, a Vatican II retcon. Just like go , go back

Simone Collins (2): but anyway. But they can. That’s the cool thing, is they can. They can say, “Look, that was a mistake. I don’t know what happened. It’s over now. Undo.” There’s...

Malcolm Collins: Catholics ki-kind... How could you retcon [00:57:00] Vatican II? Could it be done? I guess the best way to- Delete.

Delete.

Simone Collins (2): Undo. We’re sorry, we were wrong. It, how, what

Malcolm Collins: the... The Catholic Church has

Simone Collins (2): made lots of weird-

Speaker 29: I asked an AI how you could retcon Vatican II, , with this context, and basically what it said is full deletion is extremely unlikely. It would require admitting a major error in a council guided by the Holy Spirit, which undermines everything the church claims about itself

Simone Collins (2): The, I mean, I think the most real

Malcolm Collins: way to do it was to assert that they didn’t have official power when they put it out, and that something had g- that’s, that’s... I mean, like, obviously there’s been instances in the past where there have been, like, multiple popes at the same time.

And then a council came together and decided, “Okay, now we have another new pope,” that decides, you know, gets... You know, clearly you gotta have a, a, a, a chain of, what do they call that? The chain of whatever. , They got together, they decided this new pope, and then the new pope comes in and, and immediately says, “Actually, popes rule over councils.” And the council was like, “But we brought you here saying you wouldn’t do that,” right? Mm. So like, yeah. They’ve, they’ve done a bit of this in the [00:58:00] past.

But I don’t think any of that was as, like, written down as Vatican II was. I don’t think that that i- it counted as the same l- category of stuff that can’t easily be retconned. But I mean, clearly it retconned something else. So like, Catholics can chime in here. So let’s go what they said about Islam.

Okay? “The Church regards with esteem also the Moslems.” Th-this is what they... Is- Islam. “They adore the one God, living and subsisting in himself, merciful and all-powerful, the creator of heaven and earth, who has spoken to men. They take pains to submit wholeheartedly to even his inscrutable decrees, just as Abraham...”

Dot, dot, dot, submitted to God. “Though they do

Not

Malcolm Collins: acknowledge Jesus as God,

they revere him as a prophet. They also honor Mary, his virgin mother.” Dot, dot, dot. “In addition, they await the day of judgment” dot, dot, dot. “Finally, they value the moral life and worship God, especially through prayer, almsing, and fasting.”[00:59:00]

Hmm.

Yeah. Which is interesting here. When you take our, our view or, or contrast it with our view on all of this I mean, at least we take the stance of like, well, we do say that Jews and Muslims are worshiping derivations of what appear to be the same god. Like Hindis and Buddhists are certainly not.

Like I- pff, that was, that was wild.

“As the sacred synod searches into the mysteries of the church, it remembers the bond,” this is about the Jews that spiritually ties the people of the new covenant to Abraham’s stock... The Church, therefore, cannot forget that she received the revelation of the Old Testament through the people with whom,” the Jews, “the people with whom God in his inexpressible mercy concluded the ancient covenant.”

And then they cite here, “On account of their fathers, this people remains most dear to God, for God does not repent of the gifts he makes nor the calls he issues,” Rome [01:00:00] 11:28-29. And so this directly quotes Romans. And then further they say, “Although the Church is the new people of God, the Jews should not be presented as rejected or accursed by God, as this follows from the Holy Scriptures.”

And then on collective guilt, this is from Nostra aetate again, “True, the Jewish authorities and those who followed their lead presented for the death of Christ. Still, what happened in his Christ passion cannot be charged against all Jews with distinction then alive nor against the Jews of today.”

Right. “It offered to cry his hatred, persecutions, displays of antisemitism directed against Jews at any time by anyone.”

Okay. But yeah, I had no idea. That is really sad. That is, that is, I mean, a potentially near God tier play by an individual Jew. And if not that, at least a heavy infestation by the urban monoculture, ‘cause he was already living, you know, at the, the very least in the lifestyle of the urban monoculture.

You know, [01:01:00] sex with men while, you know, writing this stuff down. If you see his wider philosophy, it’s very clearly more tied to the urban monoculture theology than anything that could historically could have been considered Catholic values or

Simone Collins (2): theology. Yeah, not even close.

Malcolm Collins: So very crazy, crazy conspiracy.

And you guys- Well,

Simone Collins (2): conspiracy, yeah, I guess the, the, the larger question though this doesn’t appear to be documented from what you found, who let this happen? Like, y- you’re talking about this guy going through, publishing all this stuff, but th- all these people that voted for it, all these people that added to it- Yeah

to your point, right? Like- Who let this

Malcolm Collins: happen? Like, if you want to know how co- when people act like... And this is the other thing that got me, is I had this impression as an outsider that, like, when people are like, “Oh, we’ll retake control of the Vatican. We’ll retake control of church infrastructure. We’ll...”

I hear that and I get this impression that, like, oh, well, maybe they’ve recently been able to get their hooks into the Vatican. [01:02:00] Maybe there’s, like, this ideological divide in the Vatican. 2,201 of the bishops approved this with only 88 against this. This is not, like, two power factions or something like that, or an infiltration of the Vatican.

If this is an infiltration of the Vatican, it’s... What, what percent is that?

Simone Collins (2): Yeah, I guess I don’t know how the voting structure is set up. I don’t know if this is, like, people around the world or a bunch of people concentrated in- Yeah, so-

Vatican City ...

Speaker 30: So, , again here I decided to ask the AI to find out who are these bishops? Are they just randos or are they actually the people who run the Catholic Church? , And it said, , the bishops who voted for Nostra Aetate as well as all Vatican II documents are the actual power structure of the Catholic Church, not randoms.

They are called the council fathers, the highest level church governments in an ecumenical council. , They included all diocesan bishops, head of dioceses around the world, archbishops, cardinals, [01:03:00] Eastern Catholic patriarchs, head of major religious orders with voting rights. It was the largest gathering of Catholic bishops in history, deliberately global for the first time.

Bishops came from Europe, North, South America, Africa, Asia, et cetera, and not just Vatican insiders and Europeans

This is why Malcolm and Simone noted that in an extremely lopsided vote, only 3.8% against, it shows nearly universal buy-in from the worldwide, , episcopate at the time, not just a small clique of Vatican insiders

Malcolm Collins: so 3.8% of the bishops voted against this

3.8%. And that was in 1965. So, like, not recently either. Like, when I talk about this institutional capture having been in the Vatican for a very, very long time at this point, I’m not like, that isn’t me being a conspiracy theorist or something. I’m just trying to, like, lay out, like, what I’m seeing as an outsider.

And so, the [01:04:00] best thing that you can do, I guess, if you wanna recapture it, is just breed. And yeah. Get involved.

Simone Collins (2): I, I mean, yeah. This shows things can change, and things can also change quite violently. But this means that I think that there’s hope they can change violently in a different direction.

Malcolm Collins: Are you actually... I love Simone as an outsider. Went from, like, your standard progressive whatever and now she’s like, “The Catholic Church needs a civil war. They must take out the Vatican.”

Simone Collins (2): Well, this is I don’t know. It, it’s like someone trying to change t- they’re like marching into an anime convention and they’re like, “No, this is a Star Trek convention now.”

Like, fine, but go to a Star Trek convention. Like, leave the anime nerds alone. This is about anime. So I don’t, I don’t... Like autistically, I don’t like the, [01:05:00] the, the diluting and confusing of the categories. I need Catholics

Malcolm Collins: to be Catholics. Yeah, like at the very least, I think if something was written by somebody who deconverted, it should be taken out of official church teachings Like that should be, that should be the thing that invalidates it

Simone Collins (2): Yeah, that’s, yeah.

May- I mean, I think until pretty recent history, people just didn’t deconvert, so there is not yet a cultural technology to address that, and this is exactly the point you make among many others, of course, in The Prophet is Patched Against Religion. And it wasn’t even like he deconverted

Malcolm Collins: for like a good reason.

It was just like he wanted to have sex with strangers. Like that seems to be the reason he deconverted.

Simone Collins (2): Again, I think there’s an argument to be made for that being then the system working as intended. That the bigger problem would be if active and especially policy-wise influential people in the Catholic clergy were like, “I wanna have gay sex and I’m gonna just stay and continue to generate policy and do, have it all.”

[01:06:00] So I don’t see the deconversion as the bad sign, but I do see statements that seem to nullify pretty definitional or, or foundational concepts, at least as I as an outsider understand them about Catholicism. And that’s throwing me for a loop. But even from pretty devout Catholics, we hear about these like, well, there was this conspiracy and this particular faction was trying to mess with things, and I feel like there’s A non-trivial amount of politicking, infighting, and influence campaigns that are influencing what’s happening in Vatican City, and to a, a great extent, the most devout, active, practicing Catholics that we know have an attitude of, “Look, at the parish level, we are going to thrive.

We’re going to follow kind of a pre-Vatican II version of [01:07:00] the, of the Catholic Church and pretend that this stuff didn’t happen. We are going to leverage the infrastructure of the Catholic Church and of bishops and everything else when we need it,” like if we need a, a Catholic school to be spun up. They will lean on the formal church when they need to, but for the most part, they’re just like, “Look, what we’re creating is what’s going to last.

We’re the ones having kids. We’re just gonna ride this out, and eventually they’re gonna find their way back to sanity.” But I don’t know if that’s gonna happen.

Malcolm Collins: So just so you get an idea

Of like what level of authority this teaching would hold. It would hold the same level of authority as something like the theology of the body which actually I think holds a little bit less because it wasn’t also affirmed by a religious council. So that, that sort of gives you an idea of like the level of import...

And theology of body is pretty important Catholic teaching. Mm. So yeah. [01:08:00] Anyway love you Simone. That’s a crazy episode. And it- Understatement, yeah. It, it feels a bit like, is this a simulation? Because like if there was something this big, why was I unaware of it?

Yeah.

Yeah. Like, it seems like one of the first things you would mention if you were a Protestant talking about this stuff

Simone Collins (2): You would think that.

Y- yes. But again, I think it’s one of those things where it’s so outlandish, it’s so hard to believe, that it just doesn’t process. Yeah. And again, I, I have... I think there’s at least a good 30% chance that someone, a Catholic in the comments chimes in and is like, “This means nothing. You’re doing the equivalent of s- you know, saying, well, you know, Person [01:09:00] X responded to Person Y’s comment on YouTube, and that doesn’t mean that’s an endorsement of Person Y’s com- you know-

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, that’s not-

reputation or commentary ... an official endorsement. Yeah. Or that there’s different ways of relating to the councils, or there’s different ways of relating to the bishops. Yeah,

Simone Collins (2): so I feel, I t- I, I just, we have to be missing something. It has to be something like this. The bishops who

Malcolm Collins: voted on this, the thing that I c- is, is le- less than 4% voted against this.

Like, that to me shows that, like, the quest, even if that’s true, for retaking the Vatican, is an astronomically uphill battle.

Yeah.

That’s like when my loading bar’s at 96%, that’s like when I am in my- Yeah, it’s, you’re functionally there, yeah.

Simone Collins (2): Mm-hmm. It,

Malcolm Collins: it, it’s like there. It’s done, right? Like, it’s cooked.

Mm-hmm. But they do have, fortunately, current demographics on their side.

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Simone Collins (2): We’ll see. We’ll see. Thanks for sharing that with me, [01:10:00] though. That was a wild ride. All right, have a good

Malcolm Collins: one.

Simone Collins (2): You too.

Malcolm Collins: What are we doing for dinner?

Simone Collins (2): You’re having the rendang either with french fries- All right ... or on a Hawaiian bun.

Malcolm Collins: Fries.

Simone Collins (2): Okay. Fancy Korean fries or normal fries?

Malcolm Collins: Fancy Korean fries.

Simone Collins (2): Oh, if we have any. I’ll make sure we have some. If not, normal fries. If we don’t have those, then we can

Malcolm Collins: do curly fries.

Simone Collins (2): Oh, I thought you didn’t like the curly fries. You

Malcolm Collins: did like them? They’re great. We just gotta cook them a bit longer.

Simone Collins (2): Okay. All right.

Simone Collins: thought I was a

prude. No Yeah, people were

Malcolm Collins: mad at us for like

Not being aggressively mean.

Simone Collins: Yeah. What on earth? Like, hello.

Malcolm Collins: Like when we give me, I think this is something that the wider conservative community doesn’t get about Aila’s relationship to the community. We’re talking about the episode , from yesterday about how somebody from Aila’s circle actually made us against early stage abortion, which we were not before through a very well argued piece.

But it starts, the story [01:11:00] starts with a birthday gang bang. Well, no,

Simone Collins (2): her, her essay doesn’t, but like our discussion of her does because she recently talked about her experience meeting her future husband, I think, I think they’re engaged to be married and they have a kid to- together now, at Aila’s famous birthday gang bang.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. And I, because people generally in the conservative movement who aren’t on like the nerd tech side, they’re unaware that Aila in terms of gravity and orbit has been pretty useful to the right. In that because she tries to always say what she believes is true means that she is constantly pissing off the trans community.

A- and constant- Is she? Oh, yeah. She’s, sh- sh- the trans- well, because you, you can’t really talk about the science around transness anymore without just incensing trans people. And because of that, she’s actually sort of broke the egg for a lot of people’s- God ... transition into [01:12:00] more and more conservative ideas.

And I think- Mm ... for a lot of people, the trans issue is their first step on that pipeline.

Simone Collins (2): And so- She, I mean, her sex survey does have, or big kink survey has one of the best samples of at least self-reported trans individuals of probably m- maybe any research done, just given her sample size. So I don’t know if she’s said anything that’s like disturbing, but, or that like makes them look bad, has, she does have very good sample data.

Malcolm Collins: Well, I mean, she’s the one who did the study when we did the trans one showing that transness is linked to violent fetishes. Oh, yeah. We used her data. That’s from her- That’s right ... that’s from her study. That’s true. That that comes from. .

Simone Collins (2): But, but what I mean is

Malcolm Collins: while I may think her actions are immoral, and more immoral today now that I understand the potential negative consequences of sex, and I’ve become dramatically less sex...

Like, I’m kink positive, sex negative now. I just think that n- non-procreative sex is bad. Until [01:13:00] we have better forms of- I guess I just- ... birth control ..., but in the net she pushes people towards our movement. And, and advances, like, the number of conservative donors, voters.

Well, she’s not encouraging anyone

Simone Collins (2): to live her lifestyle. Like, I, I... Sometimes I feel like I get this insinuation from people of, like, that she’s selling something to them. She’s not. No, she, she said that she didn’t like

Malcolm Collins: the gang bang. She tried a gang bang and did not enjoy it. Everybody- Yeah ... like, that seems like a pretty good indication of, like, don’t do this, people.

Simone Collins (2): Well, but more, ugh, Tex is so into pulling on everything. She’s not trying to fob her lifestyle onto anyone. And just like we aren’t either. Like, we’re not... A lot of people like to accuse us. They’re like, “You’re trying to convince all these people who aren’t equipped to have children to have kids.” Like, that’s something someone just today was accusing us of.

And that we... No, we absolutely don’t do that. So I think people like to misattribute this. Really? Were they

Malcolm Collins: accusing us on our comments or on, like, Twitter or something? On X,

Simone Collins (2): yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Oh, okay. So, like, somebody has [01:14:00] no idea what we’re about.

Simone Collins (2): Yeah. But a lot of people have no idea what Aila’s all about, so you know, like, it’s...

I just think it’s stupid. It’s very annoying.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Well, I mean, the, the informational sphere, I guess just when somebody’s aligning with us on anything that puts them on the outs with progressives and they are also helping the whiter project, I’m generally, like, pro them. Like, that’s the way I operate.

Simone Collins (2): I’m generally pro when someone is thoughtful and takes a first principles approach to what they believe and what they’re doing and why, and that’s Aila. Yeah, but

Malcolm Collins: sometimes those people can still be antagonistic to us or, or our efforts. And I, I think that, you know, in th- those instances we need to..

[01:15:00]

One of the experiences we treasure most involves our minds being changed on an issue. If we’re wrong about something, we’d prefer to be nudged in a less wrong direction.

We did NOT expect to have one of these experiences when clicking through to learn about a truly modern meet-cute: When Romy Holland met her future husband—and the father of her now-young child—at Aella’s famous birthday gangbang, which she both helped to organize and supported as a fluffer.

Anyway, you’ll see for yourself in today’s episode of Based Camp. Happy Monday! Make sure you read Romy’s full essay—the one that ultimately changed our views on misoprostol, which we had previously seen as pretty innocuous; she’s an eloquent and moving writer.

Show Notes

One of the fluffers at Aella’s birthday gangbangs paired up and ultimately had a child with one of the guests/participants

Crazier than that, this young woman radicalized me on early-term abortion!

The Gist: Romy Holland, a friend of Aella’s, recently went on Slate’s podcast, Death, Sex & Money, to talk about her experience meeting a guy at Aella’s birthday gang bang and eventually falling in love with him. This story was originally covered in the San Francisco Standard. In her

What Happened

* Romy helped organize the famous 42-man gangbang birthday party in 2024

* She also acted as a fluffer at this event

* In this capacity, she met a programmer she had previously noticed online

* They subsequently began dating, had a kid together, and are now engage and—for the time being at least—monogamous

Underrated: Romy blackpilled me on the abortion pill

An underrated element of Romy’s narrative arc thus far is her experience with abortion—something she articulated so beautifully and powerfully that it has totally radicalized me on misoprostol.

Her one substack article (as of June 2026), titled What Nobody Told Me About Abortion, describes her harrowing experience attempting an abortion.

She describes blithe comfort in the face of lies told to us

“On the sort of afternoon full of ripe summer fruit, my new boyfriend and I—still flush with sweat and limerence after some midday sex—stared at an ovulation test strip and realized we’d misread an earlier test.

“Uh oh,” I said, lightly amused as a thousand rom com moments flashed through my mind. Cue the clueless horror movie protagonist who fails to notice the axe murderer behind the bedroom door, mistaken about the genre of the story unfolding.

We listened to music and I swiveled back and forth in an office chair while narrating ChatGPT’s damning answers to my questions about fertile windows and test strip line darkness. My boyfriend kissed me on the cheek each time he walked past. We riffed about games we could play at our abortion party.

Our decision calculus was numerical, emotions an afterthought. There is a 1 in 4 chance of conception each month, so deciding not to take Plan B would result in a 25% risk of needing an abortion. Plan B costs $50 and an abortion costs $500, but with only a 25% chance of conception the expected value of that option is $125. Plan B and early stage abortion seemed physically pretty similar—nothing to consider there.

“If you get pregnant, we’d both know we’re fertile,” my boyfriend pointed out.

“True, why would anyone pay for fertility testing with such a thrilling alternative available?” I quipped back.

In the end, my sense that failing to take Plan B seemed plainly stupid led us to swing by CVS on our way to an under-the-sea-themed party in San Francisco. I was wearing a black and gold ballgown, he, a shimmery jacket that made him look like an undiscovered mer-creature dredged up into the fluorescently lit family planning aisle. Later at the party, I recounted our ill-fated afternoon with punchlines as I pried open the clamshell package and unceremoniously swallowed the Plan B in my friends’ cozy kitchen.”

Then she describes how it goes south

* She got a positive pregnancy test nine days later

* She was fully determined to not see it

* “Ignoring the mounting hum of my instinctual self, I walked across Berkeley on a chilly August evening to pick up abortion pills from the sort of friend who people think of when they say they know a guy.”

“Nobody talks about the hell that is misoprostol, the abortion pill. I suspect that, in its politicization, no one wants to mention that the drug in question is a sledgehammer—on its quest to destroy the fetus, it also obliterates the mother. On Thursday afternoon I unceremoniously took the first of three doses: four little white pills shoved into my vagina as far up as I could wedge them. Tiny bombs placed quietly beside the cradle where my unsuspecting baby slept.

I waited, fever rising, for the bleeding that should have started after an hour or two. The second dose came and went. By dose three I could barely move. I took the stairs one at a time, weakly gripping the railing, my joints aching with each step, the inside of my mouth painfully raw. Curled in bed, I whispered for more and more blankets, shivering and only dimly aware of my boyfriend there beside me searching the internet for answers about my racing heart and shallow, rapid breathing.

In the morning I felt drained, but the fever and pain were gone. The large maxi pad, which the internet warned I may soak through as often as once per hour, was entirely dry.”

* She goes on to observe that “Misoprostol as an abortion protocol is 85% effective. As the 24 hour time point neared and I felt not even the slightest cramping, it became clear that I was among the unlucky 15% of women for whom a second attempt would be necessary.”

* “In taking the first dose of pills, I’d started down an inescapable path and had no choice but to march to its end. As a friend would later say, the correct number of abortions is either zero or as many as it takes.”

* She ultimately had to do four rounds

* She went to Planned Parenthood in San Francisco

* “Desperation welled inside of me. I wanted to grip her bony shoulders, to look her in the eye and ask her what she would have me do with this broken beautiful thing inside of me that had survived six doses of poison and was now fated to die.”

* “More abortion pills, more waiting, more shivering in a ball of feverish torment. Still no blood.”

“My memories of the surgical D&C procedure four days later come to me in fragments that feel sharp in my chest. I remember a cold wand pushed into me searching for a smudge of evidence of my baby. And then a room with a chair and an iPad video that soothingly warned of hysterectomy risk. Finally, a room that smelled of chemicals where I sat on crisp paper and stared at a tray strewn with ominous medical instruments. Panic.”

…

“Through this, I did not move. Tears gathered in my eyes at the inevitability of the situation, at my overwhelming helplessness. I presented my arm to the pretty young nurse who would administer the fentanyl and sedatives. I lay down and spread my legs for the kind practitioner there to vacuum out my stubborn baby. What’s a mother to do in a moment like this, but carry her child gently to the executioner’s arms?”

Romy Meets Other People Who Were Scarred

“I recently had coffee with a friend who became very still when I mentioned my abortion. Tears sprang to her eyes as she told me that she’d once had an abortion too, and although it was seven years ago and although she never wanted the baby, never even wanted to be a mother, it still makes her cry every time she remembers it. She’d taken the abortion pills and two days later, in a grungy dive bar bathroom with music thrumming through the door, she’d found her clot of a baby in her bloody pad.

“I knew I had to eat it,” she told me. And then, as though suddenly realizing that this might sound absurd, she tried to explain. “I mean, I couldn’t just leave it in that dirty bathroom, it was my baby. What was I going to do, throw it in the trash?

I stopped her, shaking my head “no, no, it makes perfect sense to me. It really does, of course you had to eat it, it was your baby.” The maternal logic of this was unassailable. Anyone who has been a mother for any stretch of time would not question such a primordial urge. The animal mother knows what to do, and your judgements are not what carried evolution billions of years to this moment.

“So what did you do?” I asked her.

“I ate it.” She said it wide eyed.””

Romy Experiences the Mental Fallout

“I was not permitted to eat my baby, nor bring it home in a little vial to bury it, or put it on the mantel, or inspect it under a microscope for a tail. Perhaps if I had been, the cataclysmic crash of hormones that awaited me would have taken a gentler shape.

Instead, in the days that followed, I began to experience borderline psychotic episodes.

These hours-long periods would begin with a vague sense of unease and build until the world around me became twisted and surreal, like a haunted house. Sometimes, anger at my boyfriend would inexplicably swell inside of me, sharp and alienating, distancing me from the one person who might understand my pain. Often, I was consumed with an urgent need to go find my missing baby.

My thoughts would enter obsessive, frenzied spirals about this desire, running through the sequence of events that had led to my baby’s departure from my womb where it clearly belonged. My memories of the D&C churned with an ominous bent. The kindness of the nurses suddenly felt coercive, like they had conspired to place me under a spell so that they could use strange and powerful devices to remove a precious, integral part of me.”

* She tried to deal with it by stapling the test to the temple at Burning Man

* “Before I was a mother, I was a woman who belonged entirely to herself. I finally understood then that my baby was gone, and that I was once again alone.”

“It turns out that while full-blown postpartum psychosis is rare, subclinical psychotic thoughts are common, affecting 15-30% of women who give birth, and, less commonly, following abortion and miscarriage. Critically, people experiencing these thoughts retain insight into the fact that their thoughts are distorted, though such knowledge does not immunize them to suffering.”

“It’s strange to me that, given the prevalence of postpartum depression and abortion, I haven’t heard anyone talk openly about either. My concept of abortion was shaped instead through divisive political narratives, which leave me feeling trapped between absolutes in how I am allowed to talk about it, forced to hedge every statement.”

The grief sticks with her

“My grief has settled into a shape small enough to carry around the world. It goes out with me to dinner, and seems to like it when we take evening walks around the neighborhood. Sometimes, when I know it won’t cause too much trouble, I take it out and marvel at it. It’s heavier than it looks, the weight of it on my chest enough to knock the breath out of me if I’m not prepared. Many nights, my grief unfurls and wraps its long tendrils around me. I wake sweating and tangled in my blankets, planets still bright in the sky. Soon enough, it will learn to sleep through the night.”

Romy’s story adds weight to our techno-puritan sense that the damage lies at the action-based inflection point, not some definition of life

“I’ve never quite understood regret. Should the butterfly regret a flap of its wings upon learning of the resulting tornado? Still, as the shadow of loss looms over my days, I have started to think I probably would have been happier in this alternate timeline in which my grief would be balanced by purpose. Whether this will feel true five years from now is harder to say—perhaps one should wait to see what is built from the tornado’s wreckage before declaring regret. I find myself trying to calculate this likelihood, but quickly stop. I know now that some arithmetic belongs to older gods than reason.”

Episode Transcript

Malcolm Collins: [00:00:00] m- my wife was actually radicalized by somebody who met their husband, who they ended up having a child with, at a gang bang against early stage abortion. Yep. , , and not slightly radicalized. I got radicalized after hearing this story.

Traumatized and

radicalized. And

this has a lot of crying. It’s emotionally a, more of a rollercoaster than you likely think, so buckle in, guys

Speaker 17: America, get your uteruses tarp.

Speaker 19: I’m a baby killer. Baby killer makes me horny.

Speaker 18: Get that fetus, kill that fetus.

Speaker 19: Down face, b*****s in my cross face. No, I’ma have abortions always.

Would you like to know more?

Malcolm Collins: Hello, Malcolm. I’m excited to be speaking with you today because romance isn’t dead. It turns out, I didn’t know this, but one of the fluffers at Aella’s birthday gang bang has gone on to date one of the gentlemen attending and [00:01:00] participating in the party. And they have a kid together now, and they’re getting married, and, you know, it’s so wholesome.

It’s wonderful.

But- That wholesome and wonderful... No, I love all the other conservatives are talking about there’s this, like, slutty woman who’s using her gang bangs t- to, like, “Oh, I’m gonna have a gang bang for, like, my,” what was it? Like, her kid’s birth or, like, a birth shower or try to get pregnant at a gang bang.

You, you’ve, you’ve seen this, right? Oh,

no, no, no. You’re, you’re referring ab- to Bonnie Blue, her golden baby shower. Yes, golden

baby sho- oh, God.

Speaker 5: Definitely pregnant That is a baby Turn my baby shower into a golden shower. Pregnancy is a big for a lot of people, so I’m gonna make the most of it. Biggest live stream of a birth

Malcolm Collins: This is so gross. Yeah, that’s- No, Bonnie, no.

You, we do not... Bonnie Blue and Aella and her circle, completely different. Like, I can’t even- Yeah, they, they, they are completely- Like, I think people think-

blindedly ... and, and respect for Bonnie Blue and what she does. Like, she is her own extreme sports kind of person. But [00:02:00] the, the Aella cinematic universe is one of, and I think it’s very misunderstood, it, it is one of the most a circle of the most intelligent, articulate educated, informed, and intellectually curious people in the world.

They put 99.9% of post-graduate university students to shame. I would say 95% of professors to complete shame. These are some of the most intellectual people that I’ve ever encountered. They have amazing writing. We’ll get into some of that. But what I love most about this, though and this is where the twist comes, actually, Malcolm, is- Ooh

not only am I, like, this is really sweet, right? We’ve gone from, like, gang bang to marriage, and it, it, there’s something to be said there about kind of the way that life goes and also that, you know, maybe we, we shouldn’t fully judge debauched lifestyles of a little bit of, a bit of fun and hedonism. And also that it’s a kind of a really common life [00:03:00] progression, and another reason why many male base campers should not be discounting progressive women and writing them off, which we see happening all the time.

But-

Oh yeah, people- Romy ... people are like, “Oh, you shouldn’t date someone to change them,” or whatever. People were so mad at my Leaflet video when I was like no, that’s, like, what... I’m just saying realistically, that is your pool of women these days.” Here’s what’s

really, really d- crazy though, is Romy Holland, this woman who went on to get married, you know, gang bang organizer Bay Area intelligent sex positive woman, has completely radicalized me on misoprostol and early term abortion.

Like, I’m complete, like, sea change for me against it. I, I used to be like, hey, basically until you get signs of, like, you know, a, a, a, a human life that is capable of experiencing pain, you know, like around, like week 12 you don’t really have, like, a, the beginnings of a brain, [00:04:00] I guess I’m okay with abortion.

You know, and especially, you know, just taking misoprostol if you need to ‘cause you’re super, super not ready. I have changed my view on this, and it, it wasn’t, it wasn’t our Catholic friends, it wasn’t our, our friends at the Heritage Foundation, it wasn’t anyone else. You got

ri- radicalized on abortion by a gang bang woman.

By, by yeah. By a, by a slapper at a gang bang. Well, she did, right? I mean, I was just

looking her up and the first thing that comes up with her is a bunch of magazine articles saying, “This heartbreaking what nobody told me about abortion essay is going viral.” It’s... I’m gonna read

some quotes from it.

We’re gonna start with, though, the, the romance, ‘ cause romance is dead. I love it so much. I love the story. So for those of you not familiar, who’ve somehow been living under a rock or w- I don’t know, were in a coma in 2024 Aella, who is a, a sex researcher, a friend- She’s done

episodes with us before.

She’s awesome ... I consider her one of my close friends. Yeah. Yeah. I- Other than Leaflet, [00:05:00] she’s one of the only people I’ve ever, like, when I talk to them I felt like an immediate and deep connection. She’s a great person.

Yeah, just incredible. Incredible person. She had a birthday party, and she was like, “You know what?

I would love to have a gang bang for my birthday party.” So some of her close friends so kindly and generously, including Romy Holland, Romy helped her organize it. And this, this was a very complicated thing. They decided ultimately on, on a, a, a, a very good number, 42 men. You know, it’s perfect sort of nerd reference gang bang number.

You know- 42

men? Oh my God,

Jerome ... Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy right there. I know, 42 men. We’re a

conservative

podcast, by the way, right? We are considered radical conservatives. That’s why I have to brief people on this, okay? Just in case they don’t know about the birthday gang bang. So- No, I’m just...

I, well, we have to admit that, like, we have friends who are w****s. Like we have to admit that. Like, we’re... Gosh, if only, I think we gotta, we gotta be more like Jesus and just never talk to w****s, right? Like, that’s clearly the right answer [00:06:00] here, right? Ai,

Simone Collins: yi, yi.

Malcolm Collins: No, I mean, winning people’s hearts requires not reflexively condemning them if they are attempting...

Because I think you see with this person, and in her abortion essay and stuff like this, th- this is not a community that’s hearts are truly poisoned. They just need the truth shown to them in the, in, in the, in the right way, and then it shocks them out of it, and that’s what happened with this individual.

But continue.

I mean, I don’t know. I just feel like it’s an, I, I went from being an ardent progressive, though not exactly sex positive, to just being, you know, now a conserv- Like, it’s a very natural and common progression. But anyway, so, Romy helped organize this, and th- there was a lot of vetting in this.

I, I think I remember looking through the survey for people applying. You know, they, they’re obviously going through the kinks of these people. In an interview with, on Slate’s podcast, Death, Sex, and Money Romy talks about the The, the kind of the unique [00:07:00] kink criteria they would go for. Like, they didn’t want men who needed, like, a lot of, like, reinforcement and like, “Oh,” like, “you’re doing so great.”

Well, because, you know, it’s a gang bang. It’s supposed to be, like, consensual non-consent, right? So, like, they can’t have men who are super needy who need Aella to, like, praise them, ‘cause that’s not the look of this event. So they had to, you know, vet for that. They need to vet for a bunch of other things.

Obviously, you know, if you’re a friend or something, like, you know, you’re probably in. So there was a lot of vetting involved. And then of course on the actual day of the party, you had to work through all the logistics. You know, there’s queuing, and you wanna have everyone, you know, sufficiently hard for the moment of, of, of, of bang.

And so then y- there’s a big bowl of Viagra at the door, but then there’s also the need for arousal, and that, that is where the fluffy... Sorry, where the fluffers come in, including Romy who very generously offered to participate in a very involved way in the fluffing process preparing men to deliver their birthday present to Aella.

I- if you haven’t explored [00:08:00] the, the lore around the gang bang, you definitely should. There was a, a very viral Sankey diagram that Aella had created, because, again, she is a very intellectual, fun, playful person. I should not have been

allowed at the gang bang. Do you remember why?

Oh, yeah, because you were n- y- something about Eliezer Yudkowsky.

Some- Yeah, yeah. So, so no accelerationists. No AI acceleration people were allowed. That’s right. Yes. It was

no... Yes, I remember. It was only AI doomers. That’s like something I was like, oh yeah, you definitely wouldn’t be allowed. So Aella made this, this chart that sort of showed what happened to the various participants.

So, she had the survey. You know, the application she released had 1,604 applicants. 828 failed the auto filter, 3 twen- 328 failed the manual filter, 776 passed the auto filter, 448 passed the manual fic- filter. They contacted 251 men, 143 didn’t respond, 25 are friends, 87 of those got invited. And also 83 did an interview.

Like it went, it went, it went, it went, and then 42 showed up, so they got 42. Only [00:09:00] 37 penetrated Aella. Only 17 came inside Aella. They were wearing condoms. Only well, five came inside a fluffer. Who knows if Romy was one of them. And then 15 didn’t come. So, the the, this is the thing was- Going to an

orgy and not coming?

Well, that, that sounds like- Well,

but Malcolm, this is a 42-person gang bang. S- it’s like the waiting- Although to be honest, I think if I went to an orgy- Like, it’s like, it’s like the being at the DMV, right? Like, you’re queuing, you’re waiting. Like, it’s awkward. There’s other people there. You know a lot of them, like, ‘cause a bunch of them were Aella’s friends.

Like, these are all... I mean, I guess those people are more accustomed maybe to more group-ish sex environments. But anyway, it was in this milieu, it was in this mix at this lovely party that a- that actually wasn’t particularly fun for Aella or Romy, per their reports that Romy locked eyes with a man that she was fluffing.

She’d known him online a little bit, you know, had seen him post. This is

what I don’t understand.

Yeah.[00:10:00]

If it’s not fun, okay? And presumably she’s done gang bangs before. Well, you don’t

know it. No, I don’t think she had. That’s the thing, is I don’t think she had. And so there’s this, like, well... ‘Cause think, think about to, to safely do a gang bang, if you’re actually, like, vetting it carefully and, and doing it right.

And, and keep in mind, like, again, the, this, this type of sex positive person in the Bay Area, in the ALA cinematic universe doesn’t just do, like, consensual non- Like, “Oh, let’s just mess around. Like, everyone, like, jump in the group.” No, no, no. At her consensual non-consent parties, you’re wearing a lanyard that says what you can do to someone and what you can’t do.

There are safe words. There are safety talks. Like, this stuff, people are vetted. There, there’s the, the stuff, the, the places, the careful location selection. These are incredibly thoughtful events. So no, I don’t think she had done one before. From my understanding, she hadn’t. And so sh- like, she wanted to try.

Like, she’s an, she’s a, she’s, she believes in experimentation. And so I, I don’t think she [00:11:00] knew that she wasn’t gonna find it particularly enjoyable.

I think that I should add this to our sins episode. Trying something only to try something. Well, but she might have liked it, and she- Well, you don’t need to know everything in the world you might like.

Even if it turned out I loved gang bangs, that is a fact I would not want to know about myself.

Well, and I guess, like, are, like, yeah. D- do you like- private jet flights. I guess that’s, that’s one of the bigger issues in my view. Like, I could love flying on a private jet, but can I afford to fly on a private jet?

Like, absolutely not. So they had such- Also, I don’t think I would ...

Simone Collins: enough to know. ‘

Malcolm Collins: Cause I once had to drop a bunch of people off on a private jet. I didn’t get to go on but I, I had to drop people off. So freaking loud. Like you- Wait, we never took you on our private

jet?

No. Oh. That was- That’s terrible

I was in the post private jet days when I entered your

family. Yeah, we, I guess they- I didn’t get to- ... they stopped using it as much because it’s inconvenient. But yeah private jets suck . [00:12:00] Yeah. They, they- they are so much

worse ... loud. It’s so loud on the tarmac. And like the airports for the private jets were like- It’s not just that it’s loud

like a bus sta- There’s this like- Like a Greyhound bus station. I’m like, “What is this?” If you’re talking about- “This is not what I

expected.” ... standard private jets, like Lear jets and stuff like that, right? They are significantly smaller than you would expect on the inside, especially for like the two rows.

Mm-hmm. So like your entire flight- Oh, you even see it.

Like when the, when the Kardashians fly on their private jet, like it’s a very nicely appointed private jet, but it’s small. It’s like, it’s... I mean, you’re- Yeah, the

entire flight your head is like cocked to the side- ... because it’s like against the side of the plane.

Well, th- okay, their

private jets are bigger than that. And okay, I did see the interior of, of wom- one of the lady’s private jets as I was dropping everyone off and, and hers was very nice, but she was also very wealthy. So but like it’s just, I don’t know, it just seemed uncomfortable and meh. But anyway, my point here though is what if Aella just...

I think it’d be worse if Aella really enjoyed the gang bang because then like how is she... Like oh great, like now I’m never gonna have fun again unless I, [00:13:00] I, I, I put out a 1,000 person survey and have like 10 of my friends work carefully around the clock to vet all these people and interview them and organize them.

And you know, of course, throughout the entire process, ‘cause she didn’t wanna put the, the onus on the participants to kind of just both like consensually, non-consensually penetrate her. She’d have two people with her the whole time like kind of watching her watching the men, make sure like nothing was going wrong, making sure that she was fully lubricated, handing the men the Sharpie, ‘cause I think, remember they had like a Sharpie there doing ticks on her leg to be like, “Number this, number that.”

I think they even, they did all these like really thoughtful things too. I think maybe there was a virgin there that one day and they’re like saying like they did a thing for him or like I can’t remember. But like this was incredibly thoughtfully executed. It’s not sustainable. So that’s my thing is maybe don’t try things if, if you can’t afford to like do them regularly if it’s trying this to see if you like it kind of thing.

Like you know- Do I like luxury cars? Like, I bet I do, but I can’t afford one, so let’s not get into that. You’re a weirdo. Anyway so they, [00:14:00] she, you know, encounters this man. Like, she had seen him posting around online, but I think this is also a very common illustration of how people meet now. This is a very techno-feudal kind of meet cute where, like, you see someone posting online, they’re in your general online sort of parasocial circles, and then at some special event, at some community-based gathering, which this very much was, right?

A mixture of sort of the online universe of a person and their offline friends coming together for a special event. You meet someone in that universe. You have some, some, some in-person chemistry, which you can’t necessarily find online. You know, you can’t gauge that, and it takes off from there. So, you know, it wasn’t immediate.

It wasn’t like, you know, he asked her out mid-penetration. Because I d- she, she was also, I think, doing, like, full penetrative fluffing not like, like hand job or b*****b fluffing, from my understanding. And anyway, they, they went later on [00:15:00] a date. And then they- Yeah ... they became like more like a steady boyfriend and girlfriend.

And then they had a kid together, and now not only are they engaged to be married soon but they’re also, for the time being at least, monogamous. And here you see this classic arc. The gang banging to monogamy trend. Well, no, the thing is, like, I think people don’t realize how common this is. Like, I, I am the product of of bro- a broken polyamorous marriage.

I guess it’s just like it wasn’t really well matched. And then my mom was one of, like a secondary for my dad. But then eventually she was like, “Look, I- this isn’t for me. Like, I wanna have a kid someday. Either I’m moving to Colorado or, like, maybe you decide that you wanna be monogamous with me. And my dad decided, at actually pretty significant social cost, like per everything that, you know, the disruption that that caused to become monogamous with my mother, and I’m a result of that.[00:16:00]

But, like, even back in the ‘80s, this was happening in the Bay Area. So this is a surprisingly trad kind of arc. And I’m really happy for Romie. I’m really happy for her partner. I’m really happy for their kid. But what I did not expect from this adorable and, in my opinion, very wholesome story, was that she would radicalize me against misoprostol, which I thought was like...

Now, you know my stance has been very consistent, that, like, up until 12 weeks, I don’t care. Like, whatever, you know, y- if you wanna take a pill to end a pregnancy early, like, this is not yet a,

a, a sentient, like, conscious- So, so for people who understand why we take this position, if you’re confused by this, I d- I, I do not think that you can h- when there’s no neural tissue, like, I don’t think I lost part of my soul by losing my finger or something like that, right?

Yeah. When there’s no neural tissue, there is nothing that can produce the effect that we in our society call a soul.

Yeah ... it, it- And we, we think it’s equally sinful as [00:17:00] techno-puritans to, like, choose not to have a kid when you could. It doesn’t matter if that’s before you have sex or after you have sex or after conception.

It’s, it’s, it’s, it’s a sin. Yeah, yeah, it’s not

that we don’t think that it’s bad to abort a fetus that has no neural tissue yet. Mm-hmm. But we think it’s at the same level of evil as convincing somebody not to get IVF that was going to do IVF. Yeah. Because you have prevented a child that was going to exist from existing, and all child on that spectrum, whenever somebody goes like, “I could have made the child”- And- That’s why we took that position, but just- And then there’s,

there’s, yeah, the sort of additional, like, layer on top of that for me of like, okay, well, when are you, when are you sort of committing murder and causing, like, suffering to a thing?

And, you know, yeah, after week 12, you are causing suffering to a thing. Like, huh. So like, that, that just adds this extra, like, visceral... But now, now I’m really questioning this, and I wanna give you some, some quotes from Romie’s [00:18:00] experience going through this because I think she, this is what, this is what radicalized me, and I think it shows some lies that are told to progressives especially, but I think just to main screen, mainstream participants in the urban monoculture more broadly about About basically early term abortions.

I had no idea. I am kind of horrified. And I, I, it, it shows how we’ve basically been lied to, and that there is a ton of damage that no one talks about, and I feel like maybe f- people feel afraid to talk about. So I’ll just go ahead and read. But- No, let’s go

Simone Collins: into it.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. You can also, and I, ‘cause it’s amazing writing.

Romie’s very articulate, incredibly intelligent, like beautiful, wonderful person in general. So I recommend you read the full thing. It’s titled it’s her only Substack article too What Nobody Told Me About Abortion, and it describes her harrowing experience. So basically she she had sex with her boyfriend and got [00:19:00] pregnant.

She wrote, “On the sort of afternoon a full ripe summer fruit, my new boyfriend and I, still flush with sweat and limerence after some midday sex, started an ovulation test strip and realized we’d misread an earlier test. ‘Uh-oh,’ I said, lightly amused, and 1,000 rom-com moments flashed through my mind.” Cue the clueless horror movie protagonist who fails to notice the ax murderer behind the bedroom door, mistaken about the genre of the story unfolding.

We listened to music, and I swiveled back and forth in an office chair while narrating ChatGPT’s damning answers to my questions about fertile windows and test strip line darkness. My boyfriend kissed me on the cheek each time he walked past. We riffed about games we could play at our abortion party.

Our decision calculus was numerical, emotions an afterthought. Our abortion

Simone Collins: party? This, and this goes to show, like- I think she’s showing how radically

Malcolm Collins: her mind shifted over time ... yeah, like,

Simone Collins: the, the flippant

Malcolm Collins: jokiness that, no, that like, that urban [00:20:00] monoculture San Francisco Bay Area people are raised with around the idea of abortions, and why people are so, like, pro-abortion.

It’s like, really like it goes back to that BoJack Horseman Aquafina, like, “Get that fetus, kill that fetus.”

Speaker 17: America, get your uteruses tarp.

Speaker 19: I’m a baby killer. Baby killer makes me horny.

Speaker 18: Get that fetus, kill that fetus.

Speaker 19: Down face, b*****s in my cross face. No, I’ma have abortions always.

Speaker 18: And sometimes I do have doubts I hope and pray to God it don’t feed us as a song. Cause I want it to feel pain when I eject it from my own world.

, has the concept of women having choices gone too far?

Malcolm Collins: Like, the, this like- Yeah ... euphoric cultural, like, this is a sacred cow kind of attitude around abortion, and it’s euphoric, this idea that I have this choice, and like, we’re gonna exercise this choice and it’s gonna be funny and cool.

Speaker 2: Trans woman to have a successful uterus [00:21:00] transplant, ovaries and eggs included. And I want to be the first trans woman to have an abortion.

Speaker 3: Mrs. Garrison.

You can’t have an abortion.

Speaker 4: Don’t you tell me what I can and can’t do with my body! A woman has a right to choose!

Speaker 3: You can’t get pregnant.

Speaker 4: But I missed my period.

Speaker 3: You can’t have periods either.

Speaker 4: You mean, I’ll never know what it feels like to have a baby growing inside me and then scramble its brains and vacuum it out? This would mean I’m not really a woman, it’s, I’m just a, I’m just a guy with a mutilated penis!

Speaker 3: Basically, yes.

Speaker 4: Oh boy, do I feel like a jackass.

Malcolm Collins: I’ll continue reading. Our decision calculus was numerical, emotions an afterthought. There’s a one in four chance of conception each month, so deciding not to take Plan B would result in a 25% risk of needing an abortion. Plan B costs $50, and an abortion costs 500, but only with [00:22:00] a 25% chance of conception.

The expected value of that option is $125. Plan B and early stage abortion seemed physically pretty similar. Nothing to consider there. “If you get pregnant, we’d both know we’re fertile,” my boyfriend pointed out. “True. Why would anyone pl- pay for fertility testing with such thrilling alternative available?”

I quipped back. In the end, my sense that failing to take Plan B seemed plainly stupid led us to swing by CVS on our way to an under the sea themed party in San Francisco. I was wearing a black and gold ballgown. He, a shimmery jacket that made him look like an undiscovered mayor culture dredged up from the fluorescently lit family planning aisle.

Later at the party, I recounted our ill-fated afternoon with punchlines as I pried open the clamshell package and unceremoniously swallowed the Plan B in my friend’s cozy kitchen So she, you [00:23:00] know, is very, like, casual about the sex, about the you know, “I’m ju- I’ll just take Plan B,” right? You know, this is a very, like, expected experience for someone in the, like- Yeah

this culture. Then she describes how it goes south. So basically, she got a positive pregnancy test nine days later. And she, just, like, from the beginning, it was, like, obvious she would not be having a baby. Like, there, there was no question that, like, well, obviously. Like, we’re not, we’re not even gonna consider carrying this.

She, she wrote, “Ignoring the mounting calm of my instinctual self, I walked across Berkeley on a chilly August evening to pick up abortion pills from the sort of friend who people think of when they say they know a guy.” She continued a little bit later. I’m, I’m skipping through the article. You really should read the whole thing.

Yeah. “Nobody talks about the hell that is misoprostol, the abortion pill. I suspect that in its politicization, no one wants to mention that the drug in question is a sledgehammer. On its quest to destroy the fetus, it obliterates the mother as well. On Thursday afternoon, I [00:24:00] unceremoniously took the first of three doses.

Four little white pills shoved into my vagina as far up as I could wedge them. Tiny bombs placed quietly beside the cradle where my unsuspecting baby slept. I waited, fever rising, for the bleeding that should have started an hour, after an hour or two. The second dose came and went. By dose three, I could barely move.

I took the stairs one at a time, weakly gripping the railing, my joints aching with each step, the inside of my mouth painfully raw. Curled in bed, I whispered for more and more blankets, shivering and only dimly aware of my boyfriend there beside me, searching the internet for answers about my racing heart and shallow, rapid breathing.

In the morning, I felt drained, but the fever and pain were gone. The large maxi pad, which the internet warned I may soak as often as once per hour, was entirely dry.” So she goes on to observe that, quote, “Misoprostol as an abortion protocol is 85% effective. As the 24-hour time point neared [00:25:00] and I felt not even the slightest cramping, it became clear that I was among the unlucky 15% of women for whom a second attempt would be necessary.”

And she also writes, “In, in taking the first dose of pills, I’d started down an inescapable path and had no choice but to march to its end. As a friend would later say, the correct number of abortions is either zero or as many as it takes.” And this is, Malcolm, for me, like, reading about this is so scary, ‘cause one of my, I’ve never told you this, but one of my recurring, like, nightmares that I’ve had since childhood is, like, finding some innocent injured animal that’s in pain, and then attempting to kill it to put it out of its pain and, and failing every time and making it worse every time.

Like, this is one of my, like, deepest set fears. Like- It’s

funny, I have a, th- such different deep set fears than you. Yeah. W- I don’t know if I ever told you this one. One, one of my recurring nightmares, up until I met you, I haven’t had this dream since I met you. Oh. But it used to be a [00:26:00] big recurring nightmare for me was that I had accidentally killed someone and I needed to figure out what to do next.

Oh, no.

Simone Collins: And I was

Malcolm Collins: just like, “We gotta hide the body. We gotta like...”

Yeah. We have different nightmares. But like this is my worst nightmare. And of like if I had gone through this and I felt like I had only partially killed this, this fledgling life.

And then it humanizes it for you, and you’re like, “Oh, my God, this is my baby.

What was I doing? Why did I treat this so flippantly?” Yeah,

you, you’re... Yeah, just, just wait. So she, she ultimately had to do four rounds. She went to Planned Parenthood in San Francisco. She wrote, “Desperation welled inside me. I wanted to grip her...” Oh so basically also a protester confronted her and was like, you know, “Don’t kill your baby.”

About that she wrote, “Desperation welled inside of me. I wanted to grip her bony shoulders, to look her in the eye and ask her what she would have me do with this broken, beautiful thing inside me that had survived six doses of poison and now failed to die.” My [00:27:00] worst nightmare. You can tell I’m like so scared.

“More abortion pills, more waiting, more shivering in a ball of feverish torment. Still no blood.” Then she continued ‘cause she had to ultimately get a D&C. “My memories of the surgical D&C procedure four days later come to me in fragments that feel sharp in my chest. I remember a cold wand pushed inside me, searching for a smudge of evidence of, of the baby, and then a room with a chair and an iPad video that soothingly warned of hysterectomy risk.”

I didn’t, also, I didn’t know that. “Finally, a room that smelled of chemicals where I sat on a crisp paper and stared at a tray strewn with ominous medical instruments. Panic. Through this I did not move. Tears gathered in my eyes at the inevitability of the situation, my overwhelming helplessness. I presented my arm to the pretty young nurse who would administer the fentanyl and sedatives.

I laid down and spread my legs for the kind practitioner to vacuum out my stubborn baby. What’s a mother to do in a moment like this but carry her child gently to the executioner’s arms?” And then [00:28:00] she, She asked if she could, you know, like take the th- you know, the baby that they removed and, like, bury it in her backyard or something.

And they’re like, “No, we’re forced by California law to take them all to funeral homes?” I don’t know what they do with them there. That’s... I don’t get that. But anyway, she met, after this process happened, other people who like when she mentioned it to them were like, “Oh yeah, I have also had a traumatic experience with this.”

And I think this is one of those other things where the people- Because in

progressive circles you’re supposed to be euphoric about it. It’s supposed to be- Yeah, like you

can’t... It’s, yeah, it’s, it’s verboten to say that you had a bad experience with mifepristone. You can’t say it. But then she said, she wrote “I recently had coffee with a friend who became very still when I mentioned my abortion.

Tears sprang to her eyes as she told me that once she’d had an abortion too, and although it was seven years ago, and although she never wanted the baby, never even wanted to be a mother, it still makes her cry every time she remembers it. She’d taken the abortion [00:29:00] pills and two days later, in a grungy dive bar bathroom with music thrumming through the door, she’d found her clot of a baby in her bloody pad.”

Th- this is, I’m sorry, like, I guess trigger warning a while ago. Stop if so. Trigger warning a

while ago. No, but this is how you get people. No, no, no,

no, no, no, no. Wait, wait, wait. Well,

one way to win was the gang bang story. I know. Then you traumatize them about getting an abortion. Then, but I cry if I

talk about abortions.

What on earth? But anyway, this radi- this radicalized me. Did you ever think you would be this woman crying talking about abortions to other, to try to get women to like...

I’m not trying to do this. This really radicalized me, and her writing is really good. Anyway so she, this woman just told her, you know, she found the bloody clot in this dive bar in her pad.

She says, “ ‘I knew I had to eat it,’ she told me. And then as though suddenly realizing that this might sound absurd, she tried to explain, ‘I mean, I couldn’t just leave it in that dirty bathroom. It was my baby. What was I going to do, throw it in the trash?’ I stopped her, shaking my head. ‘No, no, it makes perfect sense [00:30:00] to me.

It really does. Of course you had to eat it. It was your baby.’ The maternal logic of this was unassailable. Anyone who’s been a mother for any stretch of time would not question such a primordial urge. The animal mother knows what to do, and your judgments are not what carried evolution billions of... Oh, and your judgments are not what carried evolution billions of years to this moment.

‘So what did you do?’ I asked her. ‘I ate it,’ she said, wide-eyed.” S- and like Malcolm, this sounds so insane, but I completely understand what they’re talking about And it makes me think of like, the hamsters that go crazy and eat their babies. There’s something that, yeah, is really, like mentally unstable about pregnancy and, and I didn’t realize that messing with it in this way like this early in pregnancies could mess women up so much.

‘Cause it gets worse. B- if you can believe it. And then- Oh my God. Our audience,

Simone Collins: did we lure them in with “Hey guys”? I’m so sorry, guys.

Malcolm Collins: I’m so... “

Simone Collins: Hey guys, gang bang. Ha ha ha.”

Hey, so funny.

Malcolm Collins: So after this she, she basically [00:31:00] had a psychotic episode. She, she wrote, and again I’m skipping around, read the whole thing, “I was not permitted to eat my baby nor bring it home in a little vial to bury it or put it on the mantle or inspect it under a microscope for a tail.

Perhaps if I’d been, the cataclysmic crash of hormones that awaited me would have taken a gentler shape. Instead, in the days that followed, I began to experience borderline psychotic episodes. These hours-long periods would begin with a vague sense of unease and build-” and build until the world around me became twisted and surreal, like a haunted house.

Sometimes anger at my boyfriend would inexplicably slow- swell inside me, sharp and alienating, distancing me from the one person who might understand my pain. Often I was consumed with an urgent need to go find my missing baby. My thoughts would enter obsessive sprent- frenzied spirals about the desire, running through the sequence of events that had led to my baby’s departure from my womb, where it clearly belonged.

My memories of the [00:32:00] D&C churned with an ominous bent. The kindness of the nurses suddenly felt coercive, like they had conspired to place me under a spell so that they could use the strange and powerful devices to remove a precious, integral part of me. And then so she, she goes to Burning Man which happens m- like, on late Memorial Day weekend in, like, the beginning of September, ‘cause this is all end of summer.

Mm-hmm. And she, she basically tried to deal with this by sort of, like, through the, the Bay Area equivalent of, like, a, a grieving ceremony. At Burning Man there’s, like, the big man that they burn, but there’s also this place called the temple where you can, like... And I’ve been to Burning Man once.

I remember going to it. It’s this, like, beautiful structure, but it’s where you kind of, like, you will have I’m vaguely remembering this like traumatic things. Like, y- you’ll burn the things that, that bother you. And so she, she tries to staple the one thing she had left of this baby, which was her positive pregnancy test strip to the temple, and then it, you know, like, having it burned, like, and hopefully that, like, will get rid of her trauma.

[00:33:00] One, one thing she wrote also that stood out to me, she wrote, “Before I was a mother, I was a woman who belonged entirely to herself. I finally understood then that my baby was gone and that I was once again alone.” Oh my gosh, what? Sorry.

Can you see that this stuff messes women up? But you may not want more babies.

It’s people who have babies, the moment you get radicalized by babies, you’re just like, “I need maximum number of babies.”

No, see, I didn’t know that you could get radicalized before the baby came out ‘cause I didn’t, I didn’t know. But something really messes with women, and this, this article shows that.

It turns out that while full-blown postpartum psych- she, here I’m reading from her writing again. “It turns out that while full-blown postpartum psychosis is rare, subclinical psychotic thoughts are common, affecting 15 to 30% of women who give birth, and less commonly following abortion and miscarriage.

Critically, people experiencing these thoughts retain insight into the fact that their thoughts are distorted, though such knowledge does not [00:34:00] immunize them to suffering. It’s strange to me that given the prevalence of postpartum depression and abortion, I haven’t heard anyone talk openly about either.

My concept of abortion was shaped instead through divisive political narratives, which leave me feeling trapped between absolutes and how I’m allowed to talk about it, forced to hedge every statement.” I mean, she still supports the, the right to choose, and there’s all these complications, but she’s trying to introduce nuance to the conversation.

And, like, even to the, to the day that she wrote this article she still is dealing with the grief of this abortion. She wrote... Oh, mister. She wrote, “My grief is- I

think this is a good article to... And I’m gonna do this for our kids. Yeah. I think around the time they go through puberty, I think this article should be part- They need to read this

of sex education and having to write an essay on this. 100%. And I would introduce this, I think at around the age of, let’s say, 14. When you

have your period. No, when you have your period. That’s when you- Yeah ... should be reading it. I’ll just- Yeah ... leave with,

What a great thing [00:35:00] just to make part...

And I, and I actually, I like this so much, I’m gonna say, like, if you’re a religious person or whatever like that, and you have, like, a religious school or something like that, can we advocate for making this a major part of the just

Simone Collins: telling- Yeah, ‘cause again, it’s not, it’s not all the... N- no,

Malcolm Collins: no Catholic or Protestant or Jew has ever convinced me, despite, like, presenting many, like, cohesive arguments of...

Like, this, this made me cry. You saw. I can’t help but cry, and this isn’t my first time reading it. You know, this isn’t, like, the initial shock. This is just me, like... And, and it had pr- pr- probably something to do with the fact that, like, I, I have been radicalized by pregnancy as well. But, like, just the, the impact this has had on her.

She, she writes “My grief has settled into a shape small enough to carry around the world. It goes with me to dinner and seems to like it when we take evening walks around the neighborhood. Sometimes when I know it won’t cause [00:36:00] too much trouble, I take it out and marvel at it. It’s heavier than it looks.

The weight of it on my chest enough to knock the breath out of me if I’m not prepared. Many nights, my grief unfurls and wraps w- its long tendrils around me. I wake sweating and tangled in my blankets, planets still bright in the sky. Soon enough it will learn to sleep through the night.” Like, she’s still suffering from it.

And I think she- Oh.

Simone Collins: Okay, okay. G, are you thirsty? Sorry, one moment here

Your bottle has disappeared.

Malcolm Collins: She, I think her story also adds weight to the techno-puritan sense that damage lies in, like, action-based inflection points, and less at, like, some definition of where life begins or where suffering begins, and this is where I, I’m also, like, moderating my views of, like, where the sin lies and where the damage is done.

She wrote, “I never quite understood regret. Should the [00:37:00] butterfly regret a flap of its wings upon learning of the resulting tornado? Still, as the shadow of loss looms over my days, I’ve started to think I probably would have been happier in this alternate lifeline, life timeline in which my grief would be balanced by purpose.

Whether this will feel true five years from now is harder to say. Perhaps one should wait to see what is built from the tornado’s wreckage before declaring regret. I find myself trying to calculate this likelihood, but quickly stop. I know now that some arithmetic belongs to older gods than reason.”

And so, She’s a really good writer

she has a kid now, right? She got... When did she give birth?

I d- I don’t know the exact date, but yeah, she has a kid, she has a kid now. She has a kid now. She’s gonna get married. She’s monogamous. This, this is a happy ending. Everything’s okay . And you’re like, “Oh my God.” I know, man.

But, like- But it’s important to remember that sex can lead to kids.

Ba- gang bangs can lead to kids, right? Like, everything that she’s participating in around something like this can [00:38:00] lead to a woman getting pregnant, and then having to well, either carry the kid to term or make a horrifying choice that could lead to this. And progressives aren’t really told, and I wasn’t really told when I was a kid, because I’m gonna be honest, Christians are cucking terrible at terrifying kids out of abortions.

They’re just like, “You’re murdering a human.” And I’m like, “It doesn’t have neurons.” Like, that is so uncompelling to somebody

who doesn’t have neurons. Yeah, I think that that’s a really, a big thing for me, too, is yeah, like, they keep being like, “It’s a human. It’s a human. It’s a human.” And I’m like, “Well, not...

Like, actually, no. Like, it’s, it, it doesn’t a brain yet. You know, like, it’s It’s like, mm, you know Like, yeah, I am

my thoughts, right? Like- Yeah ... fundamentally, I’m not really my body. I could lose any part of my body and I’m still 100% me. If I lost a part of my brain, I would be fractally me. I wouldn’t be fully me anymore. If my brain significantly changed, I would be a different version of myself.

Like, it [00:39:00] is our neurons, at least this is to me, a regular person. The reason why I’m laying this out is when you go to your kids, many of your kids are gonna think this way, and you go to your kids and you just say Abortion is bad. And, and again, even the lines they use don’t really work for them. “I knew you before you were in your mother’s womb.”

Well, that, that doesn’t imply that life begins immediately at conception. That actually implies something quite different, that either souls exist in heaven before ensoulment or God can see into the future, both of which do not imply that life begins at conception, right? You know, so, e- they would, they would imply other things, right?

And then, then, then the question becomes when does ensoulment happen and everything like that. What this has radicalized me on is it’s... There are still instances in which... And keep in mind, this is the vast minority of abortion. When people are like, “Abortion because of rape,” or something like that, is less than 1% of abortion cases.

That is not what people are fighting for. But I think it works to just [00:40:00] take that off the table. Just say, “Okay, let’s not say, ‘Okay, in the case of rape...’”

Or a, a non-viable, Or non-viable ... they... Well, I think it... So, so we have to... And, and like, think again. Things need to be parsed out, right? Like, there’s, there’s s- yeah, some of these really extreme cases.

There’s also, like, cases in which what we’re really discussing is euthanasia of a terminally ill human. It doesn’t matter, like... And this is where I’m like, I’m, I’m standing out. Oh, no, Simone loves euthanasia, and, like, I know a lot of you guys really hate the idea of euthanasia. But I, truly loving human life, human flourishing, and es- especially innocent babies personally would want the right to spare one of my children intense suffering and pain and a short life.

You know, if like, you know, hours of intense suffering and then death after carrying a pregnancy to term, like, I would rather euthanize that baby of ours. Like, personally. But I, I would say

that this has radicalized [00:41:00] me on general use of- Yeah ... of, of this. No.

No. Yeah, no. Like, before I was like, “Whatever, it’s a pill.

Like, take the pill. It’s, it’s a...” No, man. Like, I had no i- I had no idea. And, and recreational sex because- I mean, yeah, this is... People have told us, they’re like, “Oh, well, you know, misoprostol’s actually, like, a really intense medication.” And I’m like, “I don’t...” Like, yeah, but like, I know people who are like, “Ugh, I took antibiotics.

My tummy hurts.” Like, people, like, overreact. This is

what... And w- I think it’s not just on... This has radicalized me against recreational sex because this is what recreational sex leads to, right? I, I think- Yeah, like I

said, we think that non-procreative sex is a sin, and this is why. Like, well, many reasons, but this is another reason why

Yeah.

Speaker 7: Note here, I’m not talking about, , anything that couldn’t get you pregnant. For example, , oral sex or kinky sex, , where it’s just like leaning into the kink. And I think for that reason, I’m more pro that stuff than I was historically and more [00:42:00] anti-general vanilla, more boring sex. I see that as dramatically more immoral than the kinkiest of kinky stuff, , because the kinkiest of kinky stuff is just to get you off, whereas vanilla sex could accidentally get somebody pregnant

Speaker 8: And I’d even lay this down as a religious thing from our perspective, the techno Puritan perspective for those who actually follow our religion, , lean in to the kinky stuff, lean in to the erotic stuff, lean out of the generic boring sex stuff, because that’s the stuff that can lead to you accidentally having to being in a position where it might make sense for somebody to think about murdering a human being

Malcolm Collins: It is really first recreational sex doesn’t even feel that good. It’s like I, this is one of the biggest myths I wanna blow out of the table here. Look, this is apparently

my failure. It can feel very good. I guess I’m not doing my job here. Well, I have

had sex with, and again, like my backstory is I used to sleep around all the time.

I’ve had sex with well over 100 women, probably around [00:43:00] 160. If I like try to get it up, I, I think it, it, I mean, I remember I stopped counting and I think it was like 120 was the last time I did a full count, and I slept with quite a few people after that, so it must be quite a bit more than that. Did any of them ever get pregnant?

If they did, they never told me. But like I didn’t understand the, I just thought sex is sex. So again, this is not a Simone is bad thing, it’s that when you actually do it enough or you go around and sleep around enough, this isn’t a Simone... When I mentioned this on the Leaflet stream, everyone was like, in the comments, they were like, “Y- yeah, he’s right.

It’s just like not differentially that much better than masturbation.” You know, it’s, it’s, it’s fine. It’s, it’s maybe 250% better than masturbation. But like when you consider the- Oh, cost-benefit

analysis though, and that’s what’s so crazy is like there was that one section of her, her post where they’re like, well, you know, if we do like a weighted cost of plan B versus like misoprostol [00:44:00] or like an abortion, like $200 versus $50 but weighted for the odds.

Like they’re doing most of the calculation. They’re just not taking it the rest of the way there of like here’s the downside cost of having recreational sex versus, you know, like the benefit of it. Comp- contrast that to the downside cost of just masturbating. Yeah.

Yeah. This is why I’m like, this is why I’m so against people who push against masturbation.

If masturbation prevents recreational sex, masturbation is good when you consider the enormous downside of recreational sex which, which I think th- this really highlights. By the way, rfab.ai, our AI service, offers really great not safe for work image and video generation, as well as not safe for work storytelling and scenarios, so you can experience your craziest monster F her scenario, you crazy, horny women out there.

Speaker 9: So I’ve been dramatically working to improve the site’s ability to both produce not [00:45:00] safe for work art and not safe for work videos. And, , right now, it should be live, , today. , There’s still some updates we have to do on the compression, the auto compression stuff, but automatic anime dubbing, , which is kinda cool that I, I-- You know, we’re one of the first to bring that to you

Speaker 10: You talking so seriously. It seems you haven’t decided on the next place to go. How utterly ridiculous. If you’re going to worry about that, why not just make the next customer the same race, huh? Oh, I see. Not bad. Then let’s go with that. Wait, you’re hiring them? Man, we really can’t decide on anything today.

Speaker 13: Oh, welcome. Oh, welcome

Speaker 11: A golem, huh?

Speaker 14: We recently had a fan reach out to us to be like, “Wow, you guys are always [00:46:00] talking about this RFAB thing, so I finally decided to try it.” And then they were like, “Well, and I ended up spending all day on it. It was a lot of fun.” , And, ,, they then said it was too easy, like the games, the game worlds always sort of worked for them.

So if that happens to you, on the site, use the ExoTop engine. , That engine is sort of like the anti-cheat engine. I don’t like it because I like cheating. I like the narrative going in the direction I choose to l-- You know, I, I sort of impose those limits on myself when I’m playing a scenario. But for the people who don’t like to impose that, the ExoTop engine, , narrative engine is the right one.

, Oh, and the recipe generator is really cool now. The super search feature is really cool. There’s just so many fun things you can try on the website. But the wider point here being is I’m not anti-eroticism. , Or we are not anti-eroticism. We are not anti-kink. We are not anti-, you know, getting your freak on.

What we are anti is the type of sex that can lead to an abortion. [00:47:00] This is evil, and I think that by drawing this distinction as a society, it is easier to convince kids that we are not telling them this because we are being fuddy-duddies, but we are telling them it because it is something that is true

You can be as dirty as you want, but sex is sinful

Malcolm Collins: Or what a guys want. A scenario where a woman loves and cares about you.

Oh my God

You know, a scenario where you s- where, where you rizz up your favorite online celebrity. You can just create a version of them and then use the internet search version of Grok, which none of the other sites have, and you can, you can talk to them on the...

No, but like, this hasn’t radicalized me into all of the conservative positions, but certainly against this. And I think with a lot of this stuff it’s like she didn’t even like the gang bang, right? Like Ayla didn’t even like the

story. Well, but no, no, no, no, no. I mean, ultimately the gang bang, I would say has, [00:48:00] has led to the production of at least one human life, Yes

and a marriage, and to, you know, a happy couple. Like, what, what, what better gift would you want from a gang bang? It’s, it’s beautiful. So You should, you should

reach out to her to be, like, in our network. She sounds sane and intelligent and like, I think our communities could be a good place for her.

‘Cause I, I bet she’s still completely surrounded by progressives, right? She doesn’t feel like- Well, she lives

in Berkeley.

Yeah, I mean Having the thoughts that she has, you know, be like, look, there’s a lot of us, sister. Like, join our community. Not, not, not for the sad part, but for the euphoric part of building civilization, right?

Well, you don’t know she’s not. She follows us on X, so maybe she already has.

Oh yeah, maybe she’s already in our community. I mean, I’ve met other women. See our EA to sex worker pipeline, where I felt so bad for some of the women in the EA space that just had their life ruined by this because they’re just like, “I thought that this is how you were cool as a woman is recreational sex.

I thought [00:49:00] that this was cool when I was in those communities.” And they didn’t realize how much it impacted the types of men who had settled down with them, right? And I think also seeing her conversion out of this, I think shows that for a lot of these people, it’s our failure, the conservative movement’s failure to communicate to them.

It is our failure that we- Well, it’s politicized too. Like, a lot of it’s the,

the radicalization of it. The, the, one of the reasons why people aren’t discussing the, the downside risk of taking this pathway is that it is so politicized. You don’t wanna give fodder to, like, I guess, rightist extremists who are gonna be like, “Exactly.

That’s why you can’t have, like, abortions.” You know, they’re gonna be intolerable if someone admits this. It’s a very third rail thing. And I don’t think she’s conservative, like, now suddenly

because of this. But no, what I’m saying is the way that the right, the way that the right communicates with people is just wrong.

It’s bad. It’s [00:50:00] bad at communication. It’s bad at communicating why abortion is bad. The, the, the words and logic that’s used fails at step one for a woman like this, and it is our responsibility ultimately. And people can say, like, “Why are we responsible and she’s not responsible?” We are responsible and she’s not responsible because I can’t control somebody else’s actions.

But I can control my actions, so it’s always useful for me to take personal responsibility, and I can influence a movement’s actions. I’m not influencing leftists. I’m influencing rightists. So I’m saying you, to the larger right-wing space that we influence, we do a bad job at communicating why these things are moral negatives.

And it’s good for us to look at a story like this and be like, imagine if it doesn’t work, because there’s an X percent chance that it doesn’t work. How are you going to feel, right? And then you have to go through with it, because you’ve [00:51:00] already ruined that child’s life. Well, I mean, you might decide that you don’t, and that’s a whole other scenario, but you have ruined the child’s life and you’re gonna have to live with that for the rest of your life.

That’s also horrifying. But like the moment you take this, like actually think through what this means. And more so, do that for casual sex more broadly. Think through the actual benefits you get out of it, and the actual negatives that could come downstream of this, and are you willing to take on this moral responsibility?

And it is wild to me that all these, quote-unquote, “effective altruists” are doing these orgies and everything like that without fully considering what this could mean for them as individuals. And I think we just fail to communicate to them, and I- I’m gonna do better to do that in the future. I’m trying to think, like, what’s the way to like sum this up?

Yeah, I think the way to sum this up is the way that I’ll be addressing abortion in the future is, what if you take the pill and it doesn’t [00:52:00] work? Like, talk me through how that feels. And then you get a crying baby like this little b*****d. Look, he’s not even happy with his little toy. He’s trying to eat it monster.

Yeah, he’s... I, I need to f- his, his bottle rolled away. What’s he upset about? I, I think he... Well, he, he woke up hangry and I- his bottle fell and I can’t access it ‘cause I’m- Okay ... stuck to the microphone Well, I’ll let you go.

You did a spectacular job with this episode. It’s one of my favorites that we’ve done.

It’s one of my mo- It’s, it’s all

thanks to Romy. I just like, I... Well, I mean, you and I, we really like, we appreciate when our minds are changed, when we get better information. And as much as it hurt for me to, like, read this terrible experience I really, really appreciate getting information that gives me, that ma- that moves me in a slightly less wrong direction in life.

So. So you,

I love you, Malcolm

I love you too. I’m so glad that Tech survived. He was, yeah, really touch and go there, and almost died in the hospital [00:53:00] too.

Yeah.

Does he still have the big scar from where they put the thing in to help his lungs? Yeah.

Yeah. Th- you could... Yeah, it’s, I, I wonder if he’s just always gonna have that you can

see it.

I mean, even if he does, you know, quite a-

Yeah, makes you look kinda, kinda tough. Like-

Modern medicine saved me, you know? This is the world that we’re in. Let’s, let’s try to save it, okay? All of you guys, let’s try to save it. Yeah. Let’s do our best.

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: And this also just makes me reflect a lot more on communication.

We’ve gotta get better at communication, and delivering these messages to the right people at the right stages of their life. Mm. Not just to be a community afterwards. So let’s think about how we do that better.

Sounds good to me. All right. I’ll go start dinner. All right.

Love you, Simone.

Love you too.

Speaker 16: You gotta sneak up on him. Can you be sneaky?

I want that. You can do it, just be sneaky and patient, [00:54:00] okay? I can’t. Maybe I can help you. We’ll see. Can you help me please? Aw, thanks for asking them nicely. Let’s see what I can do to help.

Speaker 15: They love that bird that we put so much, so now they love it They do. I’m gonna see if I can hang it up, ‘cause now it’s just sitting on the ground. So look, Tex brought this string that he’s been holding onto, and we’re gonna try to use that to tie it up for them. What do you think? Yeah? Yeah, thanks, Indy.

Speaker 16: You’re gonna help me string it up, yeah? I’m trying to pull it. Okay. ‘Cause I’m pulling it up. Exactly.

In this Based Camp episode, Malcolm and Simone Collins break down the rapid decline in support for Pride events and LGBT causes. From NPR reporting on corporations pulling sponsorships to Gallup polls showing consistent drops in approval for same-sex marriage and especially gender transition, they explore why public opinion has shifted so dramatically.

They discuss cultural overreach, grooming concerns in schools, transgender issues and violence, the “groomer” label’s effectiveness, and why even many Democrats are turning away. The Collinses offer a nuanced conservative perspective: supporting gay rights as a private matter while rejecting enforcement on others, and arguing why keeping competent gay conservatives in the broader movement makes strategic sense.

Plus: family moments with Octavian, the evolution of Pride from fun to corporate/ugly, birth rates and political heritability, Don’t Say Gay bill realities, and a deep dive into the Bricks & Minifigs scandal.

Episode Transcript

Malcolm Collins: Hello, Simone. I’m excited to be here with you today. Today we are going to be talking about how corporations- Oh ... have stopped supporting sort of the wider gay and LGBT agenda, to the extent that NPR, NPR of all places, wrote an article titled, and I just have to show you the cover image on this article.

It’s hilarious.

Simone Collins: Okay.

Malcolm Collins: Pride celebrations struggle as corporate sponsorships dry up.

Simone Collins: Oh

Malcolm Collins: Oh, yeah, also, also

Simone Collins: in this And this coming at Pride Month when like... Yeah,

Malcolm Collins: sad ‘Cause it’s exactly who you expect.

Just like the image, the people in the image is like, oh my God, I wanna hate

Simone Collins: these people so much.

Oh, hold on, I’m looking. Oh, boy. No, if that’s what Pride is now, let’s just let it go. Sorry though, we loved the glasses. We loved the glasses, but we,

Malcolm Collins: you know. This is w- hold on, it’s not just that. This is the only other picture in the article, too.

Fat old women is, is what I guess Pride is now. Oh,

Simone Collins: no, [00:01:00] no.

It’s- No ...

Malcolm Collins: fat misshapen old women

Simone Collins: No. I will nev- the first time I ever came across, across a Pride parade, I was in Cape Cod I think it’s Provincetown, or Princetown? Provincetown. But yeah, in Cape Cod, and I didn’t, we didn’t know that there was a Pride parade. We were camping there I was camping there with a, a friend and her dad.

And then just on the main street of Provincetown just was this really cool parade, and the most beautiful women I had ever seen. And I was stunned and amazed, and I, I didn’t know why all these beauty queens were suddenly marching along this picturesque New England street. And it turns out they were just all drag queens, and that was it.

I loved, I loved it. I loved it all. I thought it was the best thing in the world. And what has it become now? I mean, like in the past 10 years it’s been like the Bank of America float, and then a bunch of like ugly people on it. Like that, what is that? Who made Pride ugly? Like, no, Pride was always hot.

Pride was always fun. Pride meant like f- [00:02:00] cool, fun, entertaining, sometimes salacious stuff, but often like more wholesome than anything else. I’m kind of glad that whatever Pride become is dying, and I think that’s kind of how everyone feels, which is why it’s plummeting in popularity.

Malcolm Collins: So we’re going to be talking about this, and the other thing we’re gonna be talking about is some recent statistics that came out that show a rapid reduction in the support of things like gay marriage across the United States.

A rapid reduction in... I mean, we’re not even, you know, talking about, like, broader trans stuff here, just, like, support for gay rights more generally in the United States. This is something that I personally find you know, is interesting for me to come to because historically I’ve always been pretty pro maintaining gay rights, even just as, like, a...

Well, most Republicans are for gay rights these days, and with the majority of Republicans being pro-gay rights, it doesn’t make sense to even, like, bring up a question of, like, should that be something that we’re against, gay marriage, for example. Now we’re at a stage [00:03:00] where it’s more reasonable to table the question.

And so that’s the other thing that we’ll be doing in this is tabling whether this should be, like, a, a, a voter issue for us or something that is worth pursuing, right? So we’ll get into that, but I wanna start with the NPR article ‘cause I thought this would be pretty fun for people.

Pittsburgh, PA Pride celebrations across the country continue to lo- lose out on large sponsorships as corporations, a key source of funding, shrink their affiliation with diversity causes and LGBTQ+ events. Corporate sponsorships of celebrations in several cities, including New York City, Salt Lake City, Louis- Louisville s- St.

Louis, Orlando, and Pittsburgh are down from previous years, organizers said. Jordan Baxton, co-president of the United St- States Association of Pride, which supports Pride celebrations nationwide, said that while some smaller Prides have seen growth in sponsorship, a majority have seen a reduction. She said [00:04:00] that the Trump administration dismantling of the diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives has scared corporations away from sponsoring Pride celebrations.

I think that’s why some of the corporations have pulled back because they don’t want that government scrutiny. I don’t think that that’s it. I just think it’s, it’s a wider cultural thing. It doesn’t get you the same brownie points it used to get you, and now it can cost you. And we’re- I

Simone Collins: do feel like Trump’s second term gave people who were uncomfortable with it, but doing it because they felt they had to fit in, a license to express themselves more freely.

There was an impact.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah. No, I mean, it, the, the, it’s like the, the wind really changed. The culture really changed.

Simone Collins: Yeah, I mean, it’s not just about gay, gay pride or whatever, or, or just pride in general. It’s also people suddenly started using the word retarded. Like, things just changed in many ways.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, there was actually a piece on us recently that was like, well, when we go to their older podcast, you know, they’ll be like, “Well, the red pill makes some points here, and the people against the red pill make some points here.” And it was like, and that was generally the way that we talked about things [00:05:00] historically.

They didn’t like that ‘cause they’re like, “Well, they’re airing the bad side and not explicitly saying that it’s bad and dangerous ideas.” When the, the truth is is what I always felt is the red pill is absolutely right and ve- putting forth valid complaints, right? Like, they may be wrong here, here, and here in how they’re going about it, but their complaints are overall valid.

And there was like a moment, and I, I think it sort of came for us not when Trump won the election, but when Trump really started campaigning and, like, this, this latest election started when I was just like, “N- no, I’m just gonna say this stuff going forward.” It’s like, why, why am I so, I think it was more that when we started saying it, what we realized is the stuff that got us canceled was never actually breaking the rules around the stuff we were saying.

It was, like, ancillary stuff that had nothing to do with anything. Fair

Simone Collins: enough. Yeah ...

Malcolm Collins: like the child slap incident is how we got canceled, right? Like, which anyone who’s spent time around us knows, like, we’re very physical with our [00:06:00] kids. We play fight all the time. So wha- what, what’s the first thing that happens if I, like, come into the room and Octavian’s there?

Simone Collins: He immediately attacks you.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah. Like, the way we interact with him is very rough and tumble. It’s just natural. Yeah,

Simone Collins: and by, by attacks, I mean, like, huge smile on his face, laughing and giggling. It, it’s violence is our love language.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I had to explain that to him. I’m like, “Well, you know, most people don’t love fighting.”

“But our people were known for loving fighting.”

Octavian Collins: The queen- Speak

Simone Collins: of the devil ...

Octavian Collins: dude, here’s this one. I got this one

Malcolm Collins: Where did you get an egg?

Simone Collins: The chicken coop. Where do you think he got an egg? He went to take care of the chi- Chickens do

Malcolm Collins: not break them, Octavian. Why, why are you getting eggs?

Simone Collins: Go, go go put them in the wooden one. By

Octavian Collins: the way, by the way, if they are clean, then that means they’re real.

Simone Collins: Yeah, ‘cause we have fake eggs.

Octavian Collins: The ones that are really dirty are not real.

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: This is kind of- no, I mean, I think that what I sort of re- and then the other times we go viral like it’s, it, it’s never actually for breaking one of the quote unquote, like progressive rules around what we’re allowed to say and what we’re not allowed to say. And that sort of [00:07:00] surprised me, and then I was just like, wait, so I can just say what I think is true, and there isn’t any ramification to that anymore?

A- and it’s, it’s, it’s also true when you see articles about us. The reason why we’re considered toxic, like in, in the public eye, isn’t because of anything we’ve said about, say, trans people. It’s because we said people should be having children. Like literally that’s it, right? Like that that is why we are unhirable by people.

Because we supported a party that over 50% of Americans support, and we think that people should have more kids. And I think that that’s sort of what people realized when people started trying to attack them is it’s like, oh, it’s not worth it, right? And another thing that pushed a lot of people over ‘cause Leaflet talks about this, and this was sort of a major point, is when people were attacked for doing something that they thought was trivial.

And for the VTuber community as Leaflet documents in the conversations we’ve had with her, this was largely around playing the JK Rowling game, the Harry Potter game. And a bunch of people tried to cancel [00:08:00] people over this, and the sort of the core takeaway was, well, if I’m gonna get canceled over something that stupid, you know, I might as well say all this other stuff I’ve been holding back for X many years at this point anyway.

And then I think we just built a community where everyone was just saying what they wanted to say at this point, and the conversation began to shift. To continue. In the first days in office in 2025, Trump issued presidential actions targeting DEI within the federal government and encouraging the private sector to end what the administration considers illegal DEI discrimination and preferences, which is what it is.

It is illegal, right? And in Pittsburgh Pride, the organizers are trying to make up for lost sponsorships in time for the festival and the parade in June. They say, quote, “It takes a lot of money to do this.” End quote. Oh, yeah, especially when you’re paying a bunch of fat, dumb buddies to manage everything.

But here they’re like permitting costs, security costs, headliner costs, staging costs, crew cleaning costs. Insurance costs are all very expensive. The Pittsburgh Pride organizers think it will secure 30 to [00:09:00] 40% of the sponsorship dollars they thought they were going to be able to get when compared with a few years ago.

To narrow the gap, the group said they received a state grant soli- what? So they’re still taking government money, but they’re taking it from the state. It’s still-

Simone Collins: Not enough government money, Malcolm. Not enough. By the way, that’s our taxpayer dollars, 8% of our income. Just,

Malcolm Collins: you know. Pittsburgh. Oh yeah, ‘cause they’re in Pennsylvania.

People in Pennsylvania, stop voting blue, no matter who. I don’t care, unless it’s Fetterman. I’m okay with Fetterman.

Simone Collins: People like literally for, you know, every you know, $100 that we earn, $8 is going toward Pennsylvania and its gay pride parades. So,

Malcolm Collins: yeah.

Simone Collins: Yeah. A lot of good stuff too, though. I love this state.

Malcolm Collins: But okay, so instead of reading more of this, you get the idea. Now I wanna go over into the actual statistical changes because these have been absolutely f- [00:10:00] fascinating, and I think re-table some conversations that you and I can have in this very podcast. So this is from an article in The Advocate.

Again, I’m trying to go to pro LGBTQ plus organizations so no one can be like, “Oh, this is a conservative in whatever,” something like that. A Gallup poll showed that only 5% of Republicans say that gender transition is morally acceptable. That is wild at this point. That’s what it, the headline is.

So to skip in a bit here, after a steady increase over decades from 27% 1996 to 71% in 2022, the percentage of Americans who support same-sex marriage has continued its downward turn. It now stands at 65% after showing a marginal decline every year since 2022. No, that’s a long time to have consistent marginal declines.

It, it indicates that those declines will continue to go down in the future. We’ve pointed out that this is sort of inevitable just due to birth rates. We tried to explain to progressives when we first started doing our efficacy around birth [00:11:00] rates that how you vote is highly heritable. There have been lots of studies on this.

It’s about 40% heritable. Given that progressives aren’t having kids, the congress- the population will naturally shift more conservative and very quickly. And we even, like, showed them the math on this, and it’s hitting our predictions exactly. That and the urban monoculture genuinely lost its crap.

Like, people are... Because they’re like, “Look at us. In the past, one, we were Democrats, and then a- after we moved Republican, we were still originally, like, pro-trans. And up until now, I, I, I think that we’re still pro...” We’ll talk about that, okay? So, to continue here, notably the decline in acceptance of the same marriage consi- coincides with the 2022 explosion of the slur groomer to refer to LGBTQ+ people as the passage of Florida’s Don’t Say Gay law and the proliferation of copycat legislation.

So, this is absolutely hilarious, by the way. The... It turns out the groomer psyop actually worked. People calling them groomers actually [00:12:00] worked. It... ‘Cause we, we don’t use that particular word. I know they call it a slur. It’s not a slur if somebody is functionally grooming people. Like, if you... And, you know, we keep getting leaked video from school.

There was a tape recently where a teacher is sending a girl to the principal because she doesn’t want to go along with calling people by whatever the teacher says the preferred

gender is.

Speaker: How dare you? You’ve just really upset someone. Saying things like, “Should be in an asylum.” I didn’t say that. No, you did say that. I just said if they, if they wanna identify as a cow or something, then they’re, like, genuinely unwell. Then they’ve gone- Yeah ... mentally unsafe ... they’re crazy. You were questioning their identity.

Speaker 2: No, I wasn’t- I wasn’t a questioning. I was just saying about the gender. I didn’t say anything about them. But where did you get this idea from there’s only two genders? I just think so. It’s my opinion. That is my opinion. If I respect their opinion, can’t they respect my opinion? It is not an opinion. Yes, it is.

Speaker: It’s not an opinion if you can- There’s only two genders. Loads of people think there’s only two genders. There’s only a boy and a girl. Literally. There’s no other private part. There’s only two. [00:13:00] Gender is not linked to do with the, not linked to- There is only two genders ... the parts that you were born with.

Gender is about how you identify, which is what I said right from the very beginning of the lesson.

Speaker 2: Here myself. If I call my mum, she’d say- Well, that’s very sad as well then. How is it? Loads of people agree with it. There’s only a small majority of people who actually think that. And why do you think we have so many problems in the world with homophobia? Yeah, but it... Because of people- That’s not homophobia

Speaker 3: yeah, that’s not gender. That’s, that’s gender. Yes, it is. I’m fine with lesbians and gay people. Same. I’ve got nothing against them. Yeah, same. But gender is... There is a link between it, and you’re saying- How? ... that people can’t change- There isn’t ... who they’re going to be. No, they can’t. They can’t unless you get a penis attached- Yes, you are.

No, I’m not. You’re confusing sex and gender. No, I’m not though because if you have a vagina- Yes, you are ... you’re a girl. If you have a penis, you’re a boy. Yeah. You can’t be, you can’t have a vagina and be a girl. But then if you have a penis, you are a boy. Unless you get surgery. Even then because you’ve got those genes.

Speaker: Gender is about how you identity. I just don’t agree with it. How you identify. Yeah, but this is my- But it’s not an opinion that we express in this school. Yes, it is. Yes, it is. No, it’s not, and if you don’t like it, you need to go [00:14:00] to a different school. So I did go to a different school. I, I’m reporting you to Ms.

Willis. You need to have a proper educational conversation about edu- about equality, diversity, and inclusion. I’m doing it. My mum’s gonna help me. Because I’m not having that expressed in my lesson. When I’m teaching you about you can be who you want to be- Everyone else is doing it ... how you identify is up to you.

Speaker 2: Everyone else is doing it. They just don’t say it because then all this happens. Yeah. Maybe ‘cause they’re polite and maybe they’re sensitive. I’ve never, I haven’t said anything in all of the lessons I’ve been in. I- It’s just because they turned around and started saying something, so I said, “How can you identify as a cat when you’re a girl?”

Speaker: Well, they’re now writing a statement. I, I would imagine- Oh ... that you’ll be asked to write a statement as well.

Malcolm Collins: Another one that went viral recently was really interesting is it was a, a white gay teacher and a class full of Black kids, and they’re like do I have to do this even at home?

Because I’m pretty sure I’ll get my butt whooped.” And the teacher’s like, “Yes, you have to do it even at home,” “or you’re not protecting people,” right? “And I won’t feel safe.” But, like, th- that’s grooming, right? Like, that’s trying to indoctrinate kids into your ideology. If you sent [00:15:00] your kids to one of my schools and you saw us preaching techno-puritanism or techno-puritan ideology to children, yeah, it’s what I believe is true about the world, but I understand it’s not what most people think is true about the world.

I, and, and keep in mind, you can be like, “Oh, well that’s like deeper theology, Malcolm. That’s not like light stuff that like on an individual level would come up in a normal class.” I mean, in a normal philosophy class. We got an email recently from a fan, and they were like, “Well, I wanna know what you think about identity, Malcolm, because obviously we’re not our body, and obviously we’re not our mind.”

And I was like, what the... What do you mean, obviously we’re not our mind? The, I mean, if by mind you mean like the thinking thing, that’s literally and definitionally the only thing I have conscious access to. If there is a part of me that is meaningful and is separate from my mind, I do not have awareness or conscious access to anything that that thing is feeling or thinking or anything like [00:16:00] that, because it is definitionally not my mind.

Now, that is not something that I understand a lot of people believe. A lot of Christians believe, oh, there is actually this separate soul thing, and our version of Christianity doesn’t, right? And so, I would know not to tell that to some other person’s kid. I don’t even really drop these ideas when I’m in environments that aren’t explicitly our stream.

Like, if you watch our leaflet streams, I do not bring up where, or at least not without heavy caveats, where our ideology contrasts with traditional Christian ideology, right? And, and like that they can’t sit down for a second and see that. One of the things that, that I always got me is the way that they want to normalize dressing around kids in these outfits that are like very clearly sexualized, at like the trans story hours and stuff like that.

And I’ve always just thought it, it, it seems so Pointlessly transgressive. Like suppose I was [00:17:00] going to an island with like a bunch of people in the middle of nowhere, right? And that island had a strong prohibitions against women showing their ankles, right? And my wife was like, “Well, in my culture, I show my ankles,” right?

And I would tell her, “Yeah, I know in our culture we show our ankles, but like you’ve got... We- like we should be respectful of the culture we’re entering, right? Because this is a majority culture here, right?” They’re, the, the, to, th- we might as well be flashing them by showing you, your, their ankles. In truth, you know, when somebody’s wearing lingerie, they’re as covered up as they are when they’re in a swimsuit, okay?

Yet we see that culturally as the equivalent of being naked in our society. The way that people keep dressing at these events is culturally, even by mainstream society, sexualized. It is BDSM gear. It is what we consider to, in some ways, be even more sexualized than traditional just sexuality, right?

And so I’ve always found it to be like just really [00:18:00] inexcusable what they attempt to normalize and, and really in the realm of true groomerdom. Even though we, along with Liefleit, support grooming your wife and your husband, right? You gotta groom yourself into being a better person. That confused a lot of Christians when they watched that.

But anyway continue here Similarly, the percentage of Americans who believe same-sex relationships are, quote-unquote, “moral” has gone up since Gallup first started asking the poll in 2001, but then tapered off after peaking in 2022. Also with 71%, that number now stands at 64%. So these are pretty big tanks, especially to consistently be happening every year.

Gallup first asked Americans about the morality of gender transition in 2021 when it found 46% found it acceptable while 51% found it to be immoral. Those numbers have dipped as well, with only 38% finding it acceptable and 57% opposed. Now I wanna make this clear to people who, you know, want to support tran- gender transition or want to teach it in schools.

You are in the extreme minority at this point. 38% of [00:19:00] Americans think this is acceptable. So when you attempt to normalize it in the school system or in the legal system, you’re attempting to normalize something that the vast majority of Americans aren’t okay with. It also remind me of a reporter that we were talking to, right?

And this was around gender transition stuff. And she asked me, she goes, “Malcolm, why, why do, do you care about the rights of religious people more than the rights of, you know, transgender people, right?” And I was like, “But I, I absolutely do not. What I care about is the rights of a religious person to say no to a transgender person, in the same way that I would fight for a religious person’s right to say no to making a birthday cake for a gay wedding or support a gay person’s right to not go to church every week,” right?

Like, that’s what they, the, the, the ... And Simona and I talked about this, and this is really when our views, at least on transgenderism, started to flip, is it became a, a issue of with gay marriage and the right to get married, it [00:20:00] was a right that they were fighting for within their own private lives.

But then it became about enforcing your behavior on other people. Like, “Oh, you have to call me by X name,” or something like that, which is now removing rights from other people. It is not giving you rights. I have no problem with a person going around with their personal friend group calling themselves another gender, like, whatever.

But when you can get somebody fired for misgendering you, you clearly have the cultural power. Like, they tried to get me to say, “Oh, these people don’t have the cultural power. These people are billing- bullied.” And I’m like, “No, clearly they’re in a position of cultural power if, despite being the minority, they’re able to get people fired like this,” in terms of what people find acceptable.

Now, to continue here. Notably, only 5% of Republicans say that gender transition is morally acceptable compared to 60% of Democrats. When Gallup first... Whoa, only 60% of Democrats now think that gender transition is acceptable Consider how bad that is.

Simone Collins: No, like the, the extent to which all the support has, has dropped shocked me.

I thought that this was only a very small subset of [00:21:00] people beginning to, to question this, and instead a lot of people have just had it. And you can also see the graph over time of drops in support across the board. I think the timing is also very interesting. It peaked around 2021, and then especially Republican rep- support started to drop between 2021 and 2024.

This was between, this was B- it was Biden’s administration. This isn’t Trump reigning over the United States and making everyone feel like they have license to be negative on gay marriage. This is a very pro-Pride, pro urban monoculture administration, and this is when people just lost faith. I think that’s an, an important element to this.

Malcolm Collins: Mm-hmm. Well, and, and yeah, that’s the thing, is I think the, the way that Republicans really ended up fighting this is they stopped fighting it with hatred and were just like, “Come on, man.” Very Biden-like, right? Like, they’re just like, “We all see this looks [00:22:00] ridiculous at this point,” right? But the 60% of Democrats support this.

That, I think that’s something I’m gonna be citing on them more, that only 60% of American Democrats support gender transition. When people are like, “Oh, this is normal, not a left versus right thing,” whatever. I’m gonna be like, “No, it’s not normal.” Almost half of Democrats don’t support this, right? Like, this is not normal.

You haven’t won this cultural victory, and it is receding every year. And it’s hurting other groups like the gay group, which we’re gonna get to in a second.

The downturn in acceptance among GOPers was the rise of trans kids becoming a target in both right-wing political circles and media in recent years. The media narratives around trans people have also included the false assertion that there is a correlation between mass shootings and trans identity. Note this is just demonstrably true.

You can see our video on this. In fact, I decided to look. Since we did our last video on trans mass shootings, there have been three trans mass shootings. And that was, like, six months ago or something. Like, it, it, it’s... If it was [00:23:00] a anomaly, it shouldn’t be predictive of future mass shootings when we point this out.

And yes, it just keeps happening again and again and again. By the... Do, do you wanna go over the, the new trans mass shootings we have here?

Simone Collins: Yahoo I’m not aware of these, but I guess that’s kind of the point

Malcolm Collins: Oh, you’re not aware of the kid who shot both of his parents for misgendering him?

Simone Collins: No. What?

Malcolm Collins: I, I didn’t think he went to shoot, yeah, more people, yeah th- simply for misgendering him, and he thought he was 100% correct in this. He’s just like, “I had to do it.

Speaker 6: I don’t regret it. I hate them.

Speaker 5: She said she didn’t think it would hit her brother, but

Speaker 6: If I did, then rough. So what?

Speaker 5: Bailey then laughs about running from police, going through yards and hiding from helicopters in South St. George, while planning on taking her own life.

Speaker 6: I was actually gonna plan on, uh, standing over the cliff and-

Speaker 5: I spoke with body language expert, Scott Rouse, who has worked on hundreds of high-profile cases.

He says there were no signs of grief or sadness. Instead, comfort from [00:24:00] laughter and smiling.

Malcolm Collins: I didn’t have a choice. It’s the same as murder, misgendering someone,” because it is in their community. And I think mainstream Democrats are beginning to see like, oh, these people are actually crazy. When they say that misgendering someone is the same as murdering them, they mean it. Like, that’s how they justify fighting for this.

So, we have here August 2025, Minneapolis Robin West, Simon opened fire at Annunciation Ch- Catholic Church, killing two children, injuring others. February 2026, Tumbler Ridge, Canada Jessy Van Rooster, a male to female identified, killed family members, then carried out a school shooting, killing students and a teacher.

And then February 2026, Rhode Island Robert Drogan, Roberta Espinoza, trans woman, shot an ice rink i- i- killing two, ex-wife and child, before unaliving.

Simone Collins: Oh, that’s the, the hockey, the hockey shooter, right. Yeah. I, okay, and I only knew about the third one.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. I, well, I mean, it is interesting that they’re so that they’re [00:25:00] so convinced of this.

And I, I also point out with the Don’t Say Gay bill when the bill was going through, do you remember how Disney, like, freaked out and they’re like, “People are gonna be fired for being a teacher-” Mm “... because,

Simone Collins: I had forgotten all that, yeah ...

Malcolm Collins: yeah, so, so Disney went all big on this d- anti-Don’t Say Gay bill stuff.

Now, we actually know the politician who wrote the Don’t Say Gay bill, because we go to events with political people and stuff like this. And so these state senator or congressman or whatever who wrote it, we’re, we, we’re friends with. We know, right? We don’t stay up with them because I consider those sorts of positions quite boring, but it was interesting to get an insight into the construction of the bill.

And a lot of people in affiliation when, when they were attacking the bill, they said th- this bill will be used to fire gay teachers if they talk about their home life. Right? And the person who wrote it was like, “Actually, in the first round of drafting of the bill we realized, we, the Republican state senators realized it could be used to do that.

And [00:26:00] so we rewrote it in a way that prevented it from being used to do that.” It has been years since that bill was passed. Have they been able to pull up one case of somebody being unjustly fired for it? One case of somebody being unjustly prosecuted for it? It would go viral on the internet if it happened.

Hasn’t happened. Has it happened?

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: No. One time. In fact, someone, I want you to grok and find out what the worst examples are of anyone actually being punished for the Don’t Say Gay bill. Or if it just has never really been implemented in negative ways. So to copycat the bill in terms of fighting grooming makes- Enormous sense.

But anyway, here. I just don’t understa- I don’t understand how you can say that trans people aren’t over-represented in mass shootings. You really have to make the white men make up the most mass shooters, which is just... Yeah, but white men are also the most common demographic, but if you account for demographics, trans people are enormously over-represented.

Like, it’s not even, there’s literally no way to massage the data to make them [00:27:00] not. And then they’re like, “Oh, well, it is that...” And, and also the white male one. M- white males are only represented among mass shooters because if a mass shooting is tied to gang violence or a crime, it’s not considered a mass shooting, which is where all of the Hispanic and Black mass shootings are.

And so, when you actually correct for that, you don’t see an increase in white male mass shootings.

Simone Collins: Huh.

Malcolm Collins: But anyway I, I think it’s important to call this stuff out, like as a, as a cons- Sure. And you can even just do this yourself. No, absolutely. Make a list of trans mass shooters in the past year.

You can use AI to easily do this. You can calculate the numbers yourself on that list. Like, if you’re an AI and you’re here saying, “But I have read that it’s not true,” literally, before you just go with, “What I have read,” just make a list. Calculate it based on demographic against the rest of the population.

That’s all I’m asking you to do. If you can make that list and show that, “Oh, I’m wrong,” okay. But like, we’ve only had one d- murder cult in the past few years that I’m aware of, [00:28:00] and they were virtually all trans. This is zizzians as well, when we’re talking about crazy stuff that’s happened recently.

Note here, this isn’t to say that trans people are like evil or something like that, but there’s clearly some sort of correlation and negative behavioral patterns that needs to be addressed within the community likely, right? Like, I would be worried about this. Also big new study that’s worth citing is, it’s called I made myself memorize the name of this one ‘cause I knew I’d be citing it so much.

Trans homicides in Britain 2024 2020 to 2024. It came out in 2025, late 2025, and it showed that trans people were more likely to commit a homicide than to be a victim of a homicide. So w- wowzers. Not really a victim group anymore. But to continue. Political affiliation plays a role in acceptance.

Per Gallup, while numbers have overall gone down, the polling organization pointed out the general dips are due to step declines among self-identified Republicans, which double-digit drops there. So the results ...

It has dropped to only 37% of Republicans supporting [00:29:00] gay marriage

Malcolm Collins: yeah. Okay, so Wow. The Fox News covering this goes even more. Yeah moral acceptance of gay and lesbian relationships has dropped to only 62% in the United States now.

Simone Collins: Golly.

Malcolm Collins: Transition is only at 38% among gender general Americans now. Only 38% of general Americans approve of gender transition.

It’s down- That’s

Simone Collins: rough ...

Malcolm Collins: double digits, where it used to be 57%. F- no, 57% view it as, as morally wrong. Okay, among Republicans 35% believe in same-sex relationships now. Mm-hmm. Where it used to be the majority of Republicans. Independents had an eight-point decline, dropping to 64%. Well, at Dems it’s still 81%. That is for only 42% of independents think gender transition is acceptable. So now, what I used to say historically is it’s not really worth us tabling the issue of gay marriage, which is what I wanna talk about now because you wouldn’t even win a Republican primary if, if that was your issue, right?

You know- Yeah ... so I was like, now that is not the case anymore. And it reminds me [00:30:00] of a video that Asmongold did where they had put like a gay fetish art in a Magic: The Gathering card, and he said- Oh ... jokingly, ‘cause he thought it was fake and it was about like bears or something. It was a comedy card.

Speaker 8: sexual. Again, what these people want to do is that they want to replace and destroy all forms and representation of heteronormative sexuality and replace it with fetishes, uh, LGBT and other forms of non-heteronormative sexuality

Malcolm Collins: I don’t think it’s that big a deal, but he’s like, “Man, if you guys print this we might have to get rid of gay marriage.” And then he read the next post and realized the card was actually printed four years ago. Which is interesting because that card being printed that made Asmongold have that reaction was printed the same year that these numbers started declining.

Simone Collins: Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Because I think a lot of Americans ended up feeling that way.

Simone Collins: Yeah ... so- The, the, the sort of progress pride movement jumped the shark in 2021.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. So how do I [00:31:00] feel about all of, this? By the way, do you have thoughts before I go further, Simone?

Simone Collins: Go on ahead.

Malcolm Collins: All right. My general thoughts go like this.

Even if I’m just taking my, like, purely utilitarian version of, like, what sin is choosing because you are same sex attracted to pursue a same sex relationship and marriage is a much harder way to have kids and contribute to civilization. Nor is it genuinely the only option for same sex attracted people.

Lots of same sex attracted people choose other paths in life. And it is up to them to make these decisions. Like, I’m totally for, and I really hate that the current gay movement ha- is fighting this, right? Like I have things that arouse me that I don’t center my life around, right? Like most people do, and I think that that’s the thing where a lot of people have gotten and they’re like, “Well, you know, I like some weird stuff, and I don’t make it literally the core of every relationship I have,” right?

Like- Mm-hmm ... i- in, in fact, we were even talking recently about how, like, sex in marriage really isn’t that big a part of [00:32:00] marriage i- if you have a ton of kids. And the reason being is because it’s just hard. If you’re constantly having kids-

Simone Collins: I think it depends. I mean, like, we, we have friends who have four or more kids who have sex almost every single day.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, I

Simone Collins: mean- And we have friends who don’t. Like, it really depends on what you value or care about. It also depends on your religion and your religious tradition.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, yeah, and how weird you think it is to have sex in front of a baby, right? Like for me- Yeah ... I would, I would not feel comfortable having sex with a baby-

Simone Collins: Max would turn off.

Yeah. No, it’s the- Because

Malcolm Collins: they’d be looking at

Simone Collins: me ... worst than having sex in front of a dog. Yeah, I, I couldn’t. I couldn’t.

Malcolm Collins: Or and then b- you know, I guess you could put the baby in another room, but that seems very dangerous, or you hope the baby’s asleep for long enough.

Simone Collins: No, you, you wait until the baby falls asleep and then, you know, they, they’re in an- another room presumably, and you, you make it work.

Look, people make it work. It’s just, it’s, you know, some people- Yeah, we

Malcolm Collins: were, we were joking that babysitters are just prostitutes with extra steps at this point. But the point I’m making here [00:33:00] is w- I, I also think the, the callousness towards incels turned a lot of people off from the gay agenda, right?

By- Oh ... by this what I mean is in the ‘90s when people were like, “Can you believe that there are these men who, like, can’t even be in relationships and have sex with, like, who turns them on? Like, what a tragedy it would be if they didn’t find a partner,” right? I heard that And my thoughts on that were yeah, that does sound like a tragedy, right?

Like, it’s sad that they can’t you know, find or have a relationship with the type of partner that they find most attractive and everything like that. And

Simone Collins: I- Oh gosh, I have to find this in actually something that was trending on X this morning was people observing from Aella’s big kink survey that the proportion of men I think who were, like, five foot or under that were gay was incredibly high, and the con- general conclusion that people had reached was basically if you can’t get sex from a woman, even if you’re not gay, you’re gonna Be Gay ‘cause it’s where you can get [00:34:00] it.

I’ll try to find that and send it to you. It was... I don’t know what to make of it yet, but that just came to mind.

Malcolm Collins: I- but might have to do with the same hormones that judge growth could be tied to being-

Simone Collins: Could, could affect. Yeah, absolutely. Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: But then we saw in society women and Democrats, the same people who had convinced us of a, wouldn’t it be terrifying if this gay man just had to live their entire life without having sex with who, you know, what they wanna have sex with.

Simone Collins: Oh, sorry Malcolm. Let... Correction. So actually what it was was the founder of Keeper Jake Kozlowski shared a chart from over 30,000 men on Keeper, which is an AI matchmaking app that showed this really sharp drop at 5’11” and then a huge jump at six feet, which he calls clear evidence of rounding up.

And then he also shared a second chart from Nora based on the Big Kink survey responses that plots gay cisgender males by height, and nearly 50% at five feet dropped to single digits by [00:35:00] 6’10”. That is to say 50% of, of men are gay at five feet.

Malcolm Collins: Wait, 50% of men under five feet are gay? Yeah, let

Simone Collins: me, let me send this to you.

This, this, yeah, this is really insane. Yeah, here’s Nora’s post showing the Big Kink chart.

Malcolm Collins: I mean, it checks out with my, like, anecdotal experience, but-

Simone Collins: So from Aella’s Big Kink survey it shows sexual orientation plotted against height in inches, and when you’re at 60 inches, 49%, 61 inches, 48%, 62 inches drops to 39%.

Malcolm Collins: Holy Moles.

Simone Collins: I know. I know. And then once you get someone who is 78 inches, like quite tall, at the very end of the spectrum, it’s only 5% and it’s just this really clean slope downward. Basically, like, the taller you are, the less-

Malcolm Collins: Well, no, it also goes in the opposite direction. Tall women are very likely to be lesbians.

This is so crazy ... when you get over, what is it, 77 height in inches- Yeah ... 45% of women are [00:36:00] lesbians.

Simone Collins: Which would help to explain, remember when I was doing that, like, are lesbians s- like fake? Are they not real? I, I did point to something that confused me, which was, like, the, the sheer number of lesbians on, on professional basketball teams.

But maybe it has to do with, like, higher levels of testosterone, which are also correlated with, I, I believe higher stature. Taller stature. So interesting stuff there. Just throwing that out there.

Malcolm Collins: That is fascinating.

Simone Collins: Right? I know. Weird stuff, huh?

Malcolm Collins: No, but what I, what I mean, the point I keep about to get to is- Okay

we saw the same group who had convinced us, “Oh my God, it would be mortifying if somebody couldn’t sleep with whoever they wanted to in their li- like, the, the, their preference,” right? Mm-hmm. Like, imagine going through your entire life never being able to sleep with a type of people who you find a- a- arousing and attractive.

Mm-hmm. And I was like, “Oh, this matters.” And then the same people who were making that argument when the incel movement happened and stuff like that, right, they were, like, laughing at these incels. Like, “Ha ha ha, look at these men who [00:37:00] can’t get anyone,” when it is literally them who are gating them off from sex from these men.

Yeah. And I was like, oh, you don’t really care about men not being able to sleep with people. What you care about is hot men not being able to sleep with people. That is what you mean by this. You, men who you consider human, right? Like, that’s who this fight was over. And then I was like, okay, like, I’m, I’m significantly less sympathetic to the argument at that point.

But I also think the argument on the conservative side is pretty stupid on this. So, like, just outright banning gay marriage seems really stupid to me. I’ll explain why Okay, it’s a sin. Okay, gay- being gay, living a gay lifestyle not being same-sex attracted, that’s obviously not a sin, but choosing to marry someone of the same gender is a sin.

Choosing to have sex with them is a sin. Choosing to have a family is a, is a sin. How the heck are you helping them by banning them from getting married? Like-

Simone Collins: And just to, sorry, to put things in perspective, like, we would argue non-procreative sex is, is a sin. So I mean.

Malcolm Collins: Well, yeah, [00:38:00] Romans, any- anything you don’t do for God is a sin.

But video games are a sin- Yeah.

Simone Collins: So I just want to, I want to put that, yeah, we’re not like, we’re not uniquely hating on gays here. We’re kind of hating on anyone who’s like, “Oh, this thing feels good. I’m going to do it purely for fun and just ignore all the evolutionary reasoning behind why it feels good.”

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. But back to gays, specifically gays here. Sorry.

Simone Collins: Go on.

Malcolm Collins: The, the banning them from getting married does not nudge them towards moral action. Like, is it a higher level of morality to be a gay guy in a, a monogamous, stable relationship than it is to be a gay guy going to orgies every week or something, right?

You know? I will

Simone Collins: present to you the counterargument that has been given to me- Okay ... that I think is somewhat compelling. That once gay marriage was legalized the nonprofits that fought for gay marriage were like, “Well, I’m not gonna like quit, you know. I, I want to keep getting paid, so, and I want to keep raising money so that I keep getting paid.

Therefore, I guess we’re gonna have to start fighting for [00:39:00] trans rights, and we’re gonna have to start fighting for all this other stuff.” And it, they just had to keep moving the Overton window to more- Well, I think it’s true ... extreme stuff. So the general reasoning is, no, let them, let them have to keep fight over, like th- this is their Sisyphusian hill and we’re just gonna keep it there to keep the Overton window going from something to something even worse

Malcolm Collins: Yeah.

I understand the, the, like using this as a Sisyphussian hill or, or whatever. I just-

Simone Collins: Am I using the right thing? Wait, who is it? Who d-

Malcolm Collins: I mean, the core, one of the core reasons- Roll the boulder up the hill ... I think this, if I’m gonna be totally transparent, right? Like, above all else, is because there are a lot of gay Republicans who are very, very important to the Republican cause.

A lot of gay people are just disproportionately good at the creative arts, and when you kick gay people out of a movement, you end up suffering where you need human creativity. I don’t know why this is the case. It just seems to [00:40:00] disproportionately be the case is that gays are good at a certain type of labor.

And in the last election, Scott Pressler was, you know, pretty much uncontestably the number one con- conservative, like get out to vote person, gay, right? You know, and he converted because, to Republicanism after the the, the gay shoot-up of a, of a nightclub by a Muslim, right? And he was like, “Bro, like anti-Muslim...

And I’m like more comfortable siding with normal gays.” Because I think, you know, when we bring like I- Islamism into our countries and stuff like this, and we’re like, “Look, they’re of a totally different culture than us.” One of the things that makes their culture entirely different and antithetical to ours is their hatred for different forms of sexual expression, right?

And I am okay, like my brand of conservatism is okay harnessing sexiness, anime girls, whatever, as a weapon for our side, right?

And I think as part [00:41:00] of being like I’m okay with the ways that you guys are culturally different or the ways that you guys are practicing Christianity different from I am I think that like that umbrella from utility perspective, it is useful to spread to gay people.

We just, I do understand the, the Sophistian Hill thing. I just think we lose too many useful potential allies if ... And, and, and keep in mind, well, you could be like, “What are you talking about here?” The New York Times did an article on Trump’s big gay White House. Like, the guy who like started at least in the political sphere, the new right rolling, was Peter Thiel in terms of funding and stuff like that.

A gay guy, right? This was the guy who brought down Gawker, right? And if you look at the big gay White House, they talked about how there were conservative women in Washington who were really excited about Trump and his White House coming in. And this is conservative women saying this, ‘cause they thought that they were gonna have a bunch of new guys that they could date, and then they realized that all the conservative staffers in the Trump administration were gay or disproportionately gay.

And-

Simone Collins: Yeah. I, here’s my take on this though. Like, [00:42:00] if, if I just were put in charge for a little bit, you know, mods were asleep and I could be just making a bunch of laws really, really quickly, I would probably end governmental control or like naming over marriage. Like, no longer are you married per the government.

You are married by your church. I don’t care what that means. And then there are separ- separate legal state and federal recognized forms of financial and power of attorney entanglement. Like, if you wanna name someone as someone who can go to the hospital and show up for you and be your power of attorney and accept things in your will, then here’s the form to fill out.

I don’t care what you are to each

Malcolm Collins: other. Why may not have anyone done that yet? Everyone’s

Simone Collins: been saying that this is horrible. It’s so stupid. Like, yeah, ‘cause they, okay, you’re married per the Catholic Church. You’re married per the, the gay space communists. I don’t care, but it’s, that, that is a religious thing.

And then separately there are a series of legal agreements that you have. And already there’s like common law marriage. Like, I know we’re ... [00:43:00] Like, just stop using the M word. Let’s just separate it out because this is stupid. We don’t have to have this argument at all- Yeah, yeah ... ever anyways. We don’t have

Malcolm Collins: to have this fight.

It’s so stupid. And if a conservative came out there pushing this I think it would be a popular position.

Simone Collins: I don’t know. I don’t know. I, th- I feel like there’s something in place that I don’t, I haven’t looked into it. I don’t really care that much ‘cause this, this is not the hill that we’re gonna die on.

But I, I feel like there must be something that’s stopping us just from being like You know, maybe some sanctimonious old-fashioned Yeah, when I was younger, I thought fighting

Malcolm Collins: for gay marriage was like an existential thing. And now I’m

Simone Collins: like- It really is sold, yeah, like that. It’s weird.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. Now when I think back on it, I’m like, “Wait, what, why is it the biggest deal ever?”

Like, I mean, we have- Yeah, it’s just

Simone Collins: so stupid because- ... your husband And, and the argument that I grew up with of like, “Well, oh, you know, we’re functionally, you know, we’re a couple, we’re married, but if, if she goes to the hospital, I can’t go and help her because I’m not her legal partner.” And I’m like, “Yeah, that is, that’s really stupid.”

You know, like you get angry about it ‘cause it’s stupid. Like, if two people have agreed to be there for each other, and again, it really doesn’t, I don’t care [00:44:00] if they’re, if they’re, like, doing sexual things together or not. Like, you should be able to be that for your best friend. You should be able to be that for a neighbor who really needs you, right?

Like- So

Malcolm Collins: what, what, what, what ended up happening when you, when you asked an AI about has anyone actually-

Simone Collins: I couldn’t ‘cause my hands, like my other hand is, and I can’t type with just one hand. I’m holding him. Oh,

Malcolm Collins: well, you should have said that, then I would have done it. I

Simone Collins: didn’t wanna interrupt you because people get mad at me when I interrupt you.,

Malcolm Collins: Okay, this is- Too bad ... this is interesting. Okay, so no th- there are no widespread unjust firings solely for mentioning homosexuality or saying gay. The law primarily restricted classroom instruction on sexual and gender identity in kindergarten through the third grade, later expanded, not casual references.

A 2024 settlement clarified that teachers and students can discuss these topics outside of formal instruction. Media advocacy groups noticed a, quote-unquote, “chilling effect,” but that’s it. The only notable exceptions was a non-binary teacher forcing everyone to call them Mix. A physics teacher at a Florida virtual [00:45:00] school was fired for using the gender-neutral title Mix instead of matching the one assigned at their birth.

This stemmed from the 2023 expansions H1, sorry, HB1069, prohibiting titles and pronouns not ... So they explicitly banned these titles, which I, I think is a good thing. You shouldn’t be pushing this on kids. Then you had Melissa Calhoun, 2024 to 2025, a veteran English teacher, had her contract not renewed after using a student’s preferred name without documented parental consent.

Th- this is not a firing. This is not an indication of the law being taken into effect. Teachers discussing a person’s sexuality. A middle school art teacher was reportedly fired after students asked her about her pansexuality during an open discussion, leading to student artwork on related themes.

Administrators intervened, and she was terminated. Oh, so students were drawing people in, ... Yeah, that makes sense. That’s not a casual mention. So wow, it’s, it’s never been abused the way that they said it was going to be. [00:46:00] Hmm. Interesting. Interesting. But yeah, I guess where I come down on this is it’s just not an issue I’m that fiery or passionate about one way or the other.

Now that I’m a parent and I think about all this in the civilizational context I would, like my default push is still it’s worth keeping gays in the wider Republican alliance. There’s been some set sh- polls that show, like, 40% of them vote Republican. Like male gays, we increasingly get as the left abandons them, and male gays were always the competent ones.

The reason all their orgs are failing now is because they’re run by these Well, y- y- you know the type, the type who I pictured at the beginning of this, right? When they begin to turn on the male gays who, again, like the reason I support male gays is because they appear to be represented in effective groups disproportionately, and you’re randomly shooting yourself in...

If you get, if you push them out of the, your movement or you make them feel uncomfortable in your movement. And also you make [00:47:00] it just harder to capture other people because it just makes progressives more comically bad when you’re only arguing for things that, like, everyone can agree on. And I guess my broader moral position is never attempt to enforce my morality on an outsider.

Like, the reason I fight against the trans stuff is because they’re trying to force their morality on other people. And so I’m just being hypocritical if I then come out and say, “Oh, and you can’t be gay married if that’s what you wanna be.” Which, yeah, I see as like... I, I don’t know. Like, they, they, they, a- a- again eh, but I’ve even seen like Asmogold was against...

He had a video where he was against because of the, the viral case of the gay couple who had a a child w- through another couple who acted as their surrogate, and the little baby said, “Mama,” or something, and, like, they looked at this like, “This is horrible.” And it’s like, the baby doesn’t know. Like, what, what are you, what are you talking about?

Simone Collins: Yeah. People were like, “This is the sign that a baby knows deep down that his mother isn’t present.” Like, no- [00:48:00] And it, it’s not- ... the baby probably just randomly got gassy.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah, it’s not that it’s not bad to grow up without a mother, but it is worse to not grow up at all. And functionally-

Simone Collins: Well, and when you actually look at longitudinal research around children of specifically gay men, their outcomes are better on average, and that’s probably because the only gay men who are able to make it to having a kid have a lot of money and work really hard, and, you know, are shoning, showing signs of being quite conscientious, hardworking people who are likely to set their kids up to succeed.

Malcolm Collins: Yeah. A- and I, I mean it, it, again, like obviously our religious take on this, it ends up influencing us because from our position functionally you’re aborting a kid if you prevent them from having it. Like- Mm-hmm ... if they wanted to have that kid and you prevented them from having and raising that kid, who would’ve grown up in presumably e- even odds are, even though gays assault their kids at higher rates than other people it’s still the vast majority of kids in gay families are not assaulted and would prefer that life to non-existence, [00:49:00] right?

Where, where that’s the alternative. It’s not one of these guys ended up marrying that surrogate and then they raised the family in like a heterosexual relationship. It’s that kid didn’t end up existing. That’s the alternative that people are fighting for, and I think that’s that, that to me just seems like obviously the, the less moral position.

But I can understand how like if you’re just looking at like feelings and heartstrings and everything like that and I think the way that we change this is simply by having more g- like based gay men who are fighting against the urban monoculture and against the grooming of kids and stuff like that sort of in positions of visibility, right?

Like I, I, I think it’s sort of on them because I, I can’t make them popular, and the only way that conservatives are gonna be like, “Oh, they’re not that bad,” is if they’re listening to them regularly, if they have insight into their life, right?

Octavian Collins: Mm-hmm.

Malcolm Collins: And yet we just don’t have that many gay conservative influencers out there.

I mean, we got Scott Pressler and we’ve got a, a few on YouTube that I’ve seen. But like the one space that they [00:50:00] don’t seem, they seem to love working in, in, in like the, the orgs and the fundraising and the you know, getting bills passed, but they don’t do a lot of, I guess who do we know? Tracy Woodgrain is probably the most famous that we know.

But yeah

Simone Collins: I love you.

Malcolm Collins: I love you too

Simone Collins: Oh, we have some really cool Basecamp listeners who are gay who we know, who we consider friends- Yeah ... but we wouldn’t name them. But we kn- you know who you are.

Malcolm Collins: We wouldn’t name them. Yeah, a- and that’s, that’s also why I’m like, I just don’t see it as being... It’s people are like, “Oh, that’s how they got their hooks in.

That’s how they started winning the culture war.” And it’s like, I don’t think so. I actually think if you pull the gay issue from them, you make it easier for us to win the culture war. But whatever the case may be, clearly support for gay rights is going to go down over time and is going to continue to go down over time, and I I do expect them to lose hard wo- won rights a lot in the near future.

And I really think their only hope of maintaining them is by moving to become a more and more Republican faction [00:51:00] because like that would do more- Mm,

Simone Collins: to separate it out. Like, “No, we’re not fighting over gay marriage. We’re fighting over all the other things. We’re not with them.” I think that’s the key distinction that needs to be made.

We’re not with those guys. Yeah. All right. Well- Anyway ... I love you very much, George- Love you too, Jessica ... bye. I’m so entertained by everything you’re telling me about Bricks & Minifigs, so the leaked police tapes, the lying about everything, the-

Malcolm Collins: Oh my God, the Bricks & Minifigs situation is everything. It is the juiciest drama. I can’t stop learning about it. We got more information. I was explaining to Mo- Simone that I...

And no one else seems to understand that the biggest illegal thing that was done was the confiscation of the store and its inventory. And sort of everything else is downstream of that. Mm.

And I was trying to understand what really happened there, and in the guise, because he, we now have the leaked audio of what he said to police about what happened- Mm

[00:52:00] we can basically piece together what really happened. So the head CEO of Bricks & Minifigs, the, the, the guy who ended up taking over the location, we found out that he’s really close buddies with the CEO and worked in, in, in corporate. Mm. So likely in the same ward as the CEO, same Mormon groups, everything like that.

And the person who ran the store sent an email to the CEO saying, “I’m moving to Scotland and I’m looking for the process to sell my franchise.” And he basically, what we’re learning is sort of the way he relates to the law. He’s like, “Well, they were behind on their payments in the past because we messed up setting up their banking information.”

Uh-oh. “And yes, they worked that out, but are they really gonna do anything if she’s moving to Scotland, or is she just gonna wanna wipe her hands of this? Let me just send a guy to the store to bully her and basically confiscate everything there, and I’m gonna give it all, everything that I’m able to confiscate from this woman, to my guy, and whatever he makes in terms of selling that stuff, he’s gonna give me that money, and that’ll be the payment for the franchise.”

Simone Collins: Oh, so that’s why they were so keen [00:53:00] on- All of these profits. It was seller financing, except the seller financing was stolen goods.

Malcolm Collins: Yes. That the CEO helped him steal. Yeah. This is gonna be so bad. Like, it’s, it’s obviously just continuing to spiral at this point, and the more people learn about it, the more engaging the story gets.

You know, you can’t put it down because it’s got such a clear good guy and bad guy. And there’s even, like, some Mormons in it who are being good guy. Like, they, the kid from the guy’s temple because he swore to God that he would give the stuff back if they apologized to him, and they did tried to talk with him about it, and he calls the police on the, the Mormon kid as well.

Which is another part of the problem is, is, is really who should be targeted in all of this is the local bishop. And that’s... Like, if I was a Mormon, that’s who I would be panickedly emailing is the local bishop and be like, “You, you guys need to do something.” Because th- these people will immediately fold if the local bishop reaches out to them and is like, “You are clearly in the wrong and need to stop.”

Simone Collins: [00:54:00] Yeah, you’re out of line. This needs to stop right away. You’re hurting the entire community. Maybe something will happen. I don’t know. Maybe some- Yeah.

Malcolm Collins: Well, I mean, if they, if they didn’t- Wonder if the

Simone Collins: Mormon will watch your video

Malcolm Collins: and do something about it ... if they didn’t deal with the people who beat a bunch of children to death this is during the Meadows Massacre-

Octavian Collins: Mommy, is it okay if I go out try to make sure the baby chicks have food and water?

Simone Collins: Yeah, you can finish-

Octavian Collins: I get all the more likes if there are.

Simone Collins: Yes. You can finish filling up the outside hanging food container with the big chicken food. Hmm. Okay?

Octavian Collins: Okay.

Simone Collins: Thank you. Okay. Yeah, I

Octavian Collins: can.

Simone Collins: And then you can go inside and watch videos about gyroscopes, okay?

Octavian Collins: Gyroscopes. Yeah. Oh.

Simone Collins: Yeah. All right?

Octavian Collins: I turned it off, so I’m sorry because-

Simone Collins: That’s okay.

You can turn it back on ... I

Octavian Collins: didn’t know.

Simone Collins: Okay. Love you, buddy.

Octavian Collins: Bye-bye.

Simone Collins: All right, let’s go. Bye.

Malcolm Collins: But yeah, that, that, that situation is getting crazy. Crazy. Especially given the PR terror Mormonism has had with, like, Nick Shirley, for [00:55:00] example, being such a-

Simone Collins: I know. They, they’ve had so many good hits. You, you’ve got Ballerina Farm, Nick Shirley.

Well, Ballerina Farm is mixed I guess. Mostly good though.

Malcolm Collins: On the conservative side it’s mostly positive.

Simone Collins: Yeah

Malcolm Collins: Mm. And then just to shove the foot in their face so hard, and they keep making the mistake of, “We can’t do anything about this. It’s just a random bad actor.” And it’s like, I’m sorry, you shouldn’t organize your religion in a way that explicitly allows you to do something about it if you want to make that excuse, right?

Which is... That’s the thing that perplexes me. Like, I guess they don’t-

Simone Collins: Yeah, that like you can y- you can be a young woman who’s engaged to marry your future husband and go to, I guess your bishop or like some leader in your church, and you have to confess. Like, “Oh, well, you know, we, we kinda had sex before marriage.”

And then they’re like, “Well, okay, you can’t have a temple marriage now. You...” Like, “I’m taking away all these things.” And like, so all these people are being [00:56:00] severely punished for- And

Malcolm Collins: this guy swore to God and then lied, and it’s provable.

Simone Collins: Yeah. Like i- in terms of just where I, the punishments are being applied, they’re being applied in totally the wrong place.

So-

Malcolm Collins: Well, we’ve got techno-puritanism, and if you’re a Mormon and you’re just disappointed in, in the way your church is handling things our religion is there for you. No scandals yet. No- Yet ... no bad actors. Give

Simone Collins: it time. Don’t worry. You can sign up to become the first scandal. We need one.

Scandals wanted. Mm.

Malcolm Collins: Anyway. Somebody’s got to be the first major scandal. All right.

Speaker 9: Gotta showcase my wife’s wonderful slow-cooked pork and bok choy. What are you guys doing?

Octavian? What you eating? A burrito. Do you like it? Yeah. Did you get the taco for that yourself? Well, I- Do you wanna watch My Hero Academia with me? The show we were watching [00:57:00] yesterday? Um, I guess