Here is a tight, single-paragraph, no-line-break summary under 3400 characters, covering the full uploaded podcast transcript: Griffin Warner and Lonte Smith open with a hype locker-room clip before breaking down Week 13 CFB betting. Griffin laments Texas’ collapse against Georgia, including the perfectly executed onside kick that swung momentum and effectively ended Texas’ playoff hopes. Lonte says Texas has no realistic path even if they beat A&M, with too many 10-2 teams in the way. They move to Oklahoma vs Missouri, noting OU was badly outgained by Alabama but won through turnovers, and both hosts prefer the under given OU’s defensive strength and offensive inconsistency with Mateer. Missouri’s run-heavy approach is unlikely to succeed against OU’s stacked boxes. They then discuss USC at Oregon, surprised the line jumped to Oregon -10. Lonte argues USC is undervalued, their offense can score even against elite defenses, and Oregon has looked weaker due to injuries; he expects a shootout and likes USC plus the points and the over. Griffin questions why the market inflates Oregon and agrees USC is live. Next is Pitt at Georgia Tech, a key ACC playoff-implication game; Lonte says Pitt likely overlooked Notre Dame last week but should be focused here, expects volatility from Pitt QB Veilleux, likes the over and thinks Pitt wins outright. Griffin notes GT’s small home-field edge and the market’s lukewarm respect for them. They then cover BYU at Cincinnati, with BYU controlling its Big 12 destiny while Cincinnati’s season is effectively over. Lonte cites BYU’s resilience and trench strength, saying they can limit Cincinnati’s powerful run game and win a close one. Griffin wonders why the market keeps undervaluing BYU despite consistent results. They promote a Pregame.com discount code, then deliver best bets: Lonte takes Maryland +14 vs Michigan, arguing Michigan hasn’t justified big spreads, struggles on the road, and Maryland is motivated with solid QB play. Griffin’s best bet is Missouri–Oklahoma under 42, citing OU’s offensive troubles, an early start, and Missouri’s limited explosiveness, expecting a defensive grind.