When is it appropriate to sue a law or a policy in court, what is the role of the court in taking these cases, and where do the other branches of government fit in to the scheme of things?

In this foundational show, I use recent cases on guns, free speech, immigration, and Obamacare to give a vision of what the conservative view is about the role of the courts on rules of standing, the outcome of their rulings, and constitutional interpretation of fundamental rights. I also show how the courts are hypocritical in all ways and will flip fundamental rights, rules of standing, and state and federal powers upside-down.

Show links

Episode 322 on how we should view the role of the courts with Obamacare

The inferior courts have crowned Obama president forever. What will we do about it?

Kate Steinle’s parents denied right to sue San Francisco

Copyright Blaze Media All Rights Reserved.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On today’s show, I explain the significance of the closing of the Muller probe and some lessons to derive from it. But winning the Mueller fight is not an end to itself; rather, it should be a means of clearing the path to finally focus on the policies that matter. What is it we want to accomplish over the next 2-6 years as conservatives?

Trump should use his new political capital to announce a "sovereignty surge." I list about a dozen ideas the president should pursue that will not only put points on the board to make America great again, but put the Democrats on defense and prevent them from focusing on endless investigations. 

Show links

Department of Education is essentially Obama’s third term thanks to the courts

10 ways Trump should spend his post-Mueller political capital

Over 50,000 illegals from terrorist countries who have still not been deported, despite final orders

Talk about Russian collusion! Russians continue to come here to have anchor babies who will vote in our elections

White House petition to shut down the border  

Copyright Blaze Media All Rights Reserved.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

On today’s show, we learn the ancient and timely lesson of the Golden Calf and how it defines much of the conservative movement and its outlets in recent years. The Left seeks talking points for policies, "conservatives" seek policies for talking points. I study this new aphorism in the context of how the conservative media has now made Lindsey Graham a hero just in time to prevent us from beating him in a primary. And they are doing so all for another golden calf – Justice Kavanaugh.  

Show links

Federal judge goes after Kentucky’s law barring gender-selection abortions

Learning from the Haitian boat migrants and understanding president’s power to exclude  

What we should learn from Israel and sovereignty

2 more Americans killed by illegal aliens who should have been deported

Copyright Blaze Media All Rights Reserved.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

We can’t adjudicate or investigate our way out of an invasion. Today, I am joined by Jaeson Jones, retired captain in the Texas Rangers and expert on Mexican cartels, to discuss why the president should designate the cartels as terror groups and what effect that would have on both our government and the Mexican government in combatting the source of the border problem. 

Then, I explain why Justice Scalia believed even states had the right to repel an invasion. How much more so the federal government?

Show links

We are bringing in the persecutors, not the persecuted 

We won an immigration case at the Supreme Court but are losing the war

The case for designating the cartels as terrorists

Copyright Blaze Media All Rights Reserved.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Today, I go through four important immigration principles that explain what is going on, on both the legal and political sides. 1) You can’t adjudicate yourself out of an invasion. 2) Nothing trumps sovereignty of a nation. 3) An invasion through lawfare and migration is worse than a conventional invasion. 4) Unless we believe in our own sovereignty and push back against the lawfare wholesale, no new statutes will change anything. 

I explain the history of how illegals got so many rights to litigate when we used to deport hundreds of thousands within a few months without any hearings in the Eisenhower era.  The people never voted for these changes, and indeed our laws have been supplanted by lawfare. I also discuss some of the lessons of the Haitian migration crisis of the early 1990s.

Finally, I explain why the Supreme Court victory on criminal alien detentions is another example of winning a single battle while losing the war on sovereignty. 

Show links

1 million illegals with final deportation orders not deported

Court ruling in Nielsen v. Preap

SCOTUS allows anti-religious liberty ruling to stand

Copyright Blaze Media All Rights Reserved.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices