
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In an episode that may (or may not) be his magnum opus, Bruce introduces his term for Karl Popper’s idea that you are only allowed to solve problems with your (scientific) theory by making it more empirical, not less empirical.
Bruce makes the case that this is one of Karl Popper’s least appreciated ideas, as all of us are tempted by ad hoc saves that move our ideas in the direction of vagueness.
Bruce also considers where conjectures come from and if Popper thought there existed a scientific method.
By Bruce Nielson and Peter Johansen5
2525 ratings
In an episode that may (or may not) be his magnum opus, Bruce introduces his term for Karl Popper’s idea that you are only allowed to solve problems with your (scientific) theory by making it more empirical, not less empirical.
Bruce makes the case that this is one of Karl Popper’s least appreciated ideas, as all of us are tempted by ad hoc saves that move our ideas in the direction of vagueness.
Bruce also considers where conjectures come from and if Popper thought there existed a scientific method.

16,175 Listeners

26,311 Listeners

2,461 Listeners

315 Listeners

94 Listeners

2,121 Listeners

1,656 Listeners

23 Listeners

97 Listeners

18 Listeners

531 Listeners

26 Listeners

265 Listeners

473 Listeners

5 Listeners