
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Based on Podcast App listening data
Jim Paulsen returns to Excess Returns to discuss why he is increasingly concerned about a meaningful stock market pullback, even though he does not expect a bear market. We cover the extreme divide between AI-driven “new era” stocks and the rest of the market, what oil and inflation could mean for the Fed, why tech earnings and market leadership have become so concentrated, and what investors should watch as the economy potentially shifts from inflation fears to growth fears.
Subscribe to the Jim Paulsen Show on Spotify
Subscribe to the Jim Paulsen Show on Apple Podcasts
Jim Paulsen on X
https://x.com/jimwpaulsen
Paulsen Perspectives
https://paulsenperspectives.substack.com/
Topics Covered
Why Jim thinks the economy could weaken into the summer and fall
The risk of a sharp stock market pullback without a full bear market
How inflation, oil prices and geopolitical conflict are affecting the market
Why the Fed may face a difficult decision under Kevin Warsh
The extreme divide between new era tech stocks and old era stocks
Why AI and innovation need to benefit the broader economy to be sustainable
How tech earnings have become concentrated in only two S&P 500 sectors
Why small-cap tech and unprofitable tech leadership may be a warning sign
What past oil price peaks suggest about stock market corrections
Why investor focus may shift from inflation risk to growth risk
How this bull market has been driven by a series of booms in Mag 7, Bitcoin, gold, oil and AI
Timestamps
00:00 Why AI has to benefit more than the tech sector
05:18 Inflation, oil prices and the impact of geopolitical conflict
10:54 New era stocks versus old era stocks
15:43 Corporate cash, AI spending and pressure on tech investment
20:17 Policy tightening and why economic momentum may slow
25:31 Why AI must spread beyond the companies building it
31:42 Why this tech boom is different from the 1990s
36:51 Why market breadth keeps fading back into large-cap growth
42:06 Small-cap tech and unprofitable tech start leading
46:15 Why the damage from oil shocks often comes after oil peaks
50:15 How the market could shift from inflation fear to growth fear
54:40 The bull market of booms in Mag 7, Bitcoin, gold, oil and AI
59:46 Jim’s main takeaway for investors now
Follow the Excess Returns podcasts:
https://excessreturnspod.com/
Contact us:
[email protected]/
No information on this podcast should be construed as investment advice. Securities discussed in the podcast may be holdings of the firms of the hosts or their clients.
Kai Wu of Sparkline Capital joins Excess Returns to break down his latest research on AI disruption, software stocks, value traps, and intangible moats. We discuss why software valuations have collapsed, why traditional value investing can fail during technological disruption, and how investors can separate potential AI winners from companies whose business models may be permanently impaired.
AI Disruption: Moats and Value Traps
https://www.sparklinecapital.com/post/ai-disruption
Kai Wu on X
https://x.com/ckaiwu
Sparkline Capital
https://www.sparklinecapital.com/
Topics Covered:
Why software stocks are trading at a historically unusual discount to the market
How AI disruption can create both real opportunities and dangerous value traps
Why Blockbuster, Borders, RadioShack and newspapers offer lessons for today’s software selloff
How patent data and natural language processing can measure technological disruption
Why disruption has helped explain the poor performance of traditional value investing
Why value investing may still work in sectors insulated from technological change
How intangible assets like brand, human capital, intellectual property and network effects can protect companies
Why Walmart and The New York Times survived disruption while other incumbents did not
How David Teece’s complementary assets framework applies to AI, software and moats
Why AI adoption and intangible value together may help identify software survivors
Why high dispersion in disruption-scare stocks creates a potential opportunity for stock pickers
Timestamps:
00:00 Software stocks now trade at a historic discount
04:26 What makes a cheap stock a value trap
08:25 Measuring disruption using patents, filings and natural language processing
13:23 Is AI the biggest disruptive wave in history?
14:55 Why disruption keeps stacking on retailers
17:10 How technological change disrupted traditional value investing
21:20 Why value investors need to know when not to apply old metrics
25:06 Why more of the market is exposed to innovation than ever before
27:07 What Walmart and The New York Times teach about surviving disruption
32:40 The four intangible moats that can protect companies
35:02 Why intangible value works better in disrupted industries
38:50 Apple, Amazon, Macy’s and the difference between disruptors and value traps
42:58 Applying intangible value to beaten-down software stocks
47:05 Why AI adoption alone is not enough
48:23 How AI could improve margins for surviving software companies
50:09 Which industries are adopting AI fastest
52:14 The software sweet spot: AI adoption plus intangible moats
53:53 Why disruption-scare stocks have extreme return dispersion
57:40 What happens when intangible value is applied to high-disruption stocks
01:01:42 Why “code is not the moat” for many software companies
In this episode of Last Call, we break down one of the most confusing market backdrops in years: AI-driven earnings optimism, rising oil and inflation risk, stretched options positioning, and the market impact of a potential SpaceX IPO. Jack Forehand and Matt Zeigler are joined by Aahan Menon, Ben Hunt, and Brent Kochuba to examine what macro data, political narratives, options flows, and index mechanics are saying about where markets could go next.
Follow Last Call on Spotify
Follow Last Call on Apple Podcasts
Topics Covered:
Why markets are looking through war, oil shocks and valuation concerns
How earnings estimates are driving sector performance in the AI trade
Aahan Menon on growth, inflation, oil prices and macro regime signals
Why demand destruction from higher energy prices can take longer than investors expect
What a rising growth and rising inflation regime can mean for stocks, commodities and bonds
Ben Hunt on World War AI and the collision between AI market optimism and political backlash
Why opposition to AI data centers could become a major market and election issue
Brent Kochuba on call buying, implied volatility and signs of options market froth
Why CORE 1M and skew signals may be warning of a downside spasm
How the SpaceX IPO could affect index flows, active managers and mega-cap stocks
Timestamps:
00:00 Intro: AI, inflation and options risk in one market
05:40 Earnings estimates, AI optimism and why fundamentals still matter
10:31 Aahan Menon on a difficult macro backdrop
15:29 Why energy shocks and demand destruction take time
20:24 Why inflation can persist even if the oil shock eases
24:47 Ben Hunt on World War AI and the AI resource build-out
30:00 AI CapEx as the pillar holding up market optimism
34:00 The political backlash against AI data centers
38:00 Why data center opposition matters for markets
42:09 Why price action can distort the AI narrative
47:48 CORE 1M, stretched call prices and downside spasm risk
52:00 Why Nasdaq options are priced for upside crashes
56:11 Index rules, human judgment and the SpaceX IPO
01:00:34 The free float problem and rebalancing pressure
01:05:22 Space data centers, valuation and the size of the AI opportunity
Adam Parker returns to Excess Returns to explain why the market may be trading more on future fundamentals than investors think, how AI is reshaping stock selection, and why traditional valuation signals may be less useful than they once were.
We discuss AI revenue exposure, software vs. semiconductors, Mag Seven positioning, gross margins, estimate achievability, spinoffs, and Adam’s highest-conviction contrarian sector idea.
Adam Parker on X
https://x.com/Adam_Parker_Tri
Trivariate Research
https://trivariateresearch.com/
Trivector Research
https://www.trivectorresearch.com
Topics covered:
Why “sell in May” and other calendar-based market rules often lack statistical support
Why Adam thinks the stock market leads the economy, not the other way around
How to think about whether today’s AI market is a bubble
Why the market may be trading on 2030 or 2031 fundamentals
When investors may start demanding returns on AI capital spending
Why AI could create new jobs rather than simply destroy existing ones
How large AI-related IPOs like SpaceX could affect index mechanics and portfolio flows
Why gross margin expansion is one of Adam’s most important stock selection factors
Why Adam remains cautious on software and prefers semiconductors over software
How valuation, quality, and other traditional factors may have changed since COVID
Why estimate achievability and incremental margins matter more than simple beats and misses
How to think about the Mag Seven, Nvidia, and market concentration
Why spinoffs may become more important in an AI-driven market
Why healthcare is Adam’s highest-conviction contrarian sector idea
Timestamps:
00:00 Why the market may be trading on future fundamentals
04:37 Is today’s stock market an AI bubble?
08:45 When AI capex needs to show real returns
13:00 How trillion-dollar IPOs could reshape index mechanics
19:00 Why gross margin expansion is such a powerful factor
23:00 Why software companies face AI-driven margin pressure
27:21 Where AI semiconductor exposure goes next
31:54 Why valuation does not work for stock picking
35:03 What has changed in markets since COVID
39:22 Estimate achievability and incremental margins
43:06 How to think about the Mag Seven and Nvidia
47:55 Why healthcare could be the biggest AI opportunity
Eric Crittenden joins Matt Zeigler and Jason Buck for a deep dive into trend following and managed futures.
They discuss why systematic macro trend investing works, how risk transfer creates a return premium, and how trend can fit inside a diversified all-weather portfolio.
Standpoint Funds
https://www.standpointfunds.com/
Topics covered:
Why trend following can struggle during fast reversals and thrive after regime shifts
How systematic investors manage whipsaws, drawdowns, and emotional pressure
The trade-offs between short-term, medium-term, and long-term trend signals
Why Eric prefers simple, durable systems over complex models and constant tinkering
When it makes sense to remove a futures market from a systematic portfolio
Why trend following may earn a risk transfer premium from hedgers and commercial users
How copper producers, options markets, and insurance help explain trend following returns
Why rising interest rates and short bond positions can benefit managed futures
How trend following can pair with global equities in an all-weather portfolio
Why smoothing a trend strategy can reduce its value when investors need convexity most
The behavioral challenge of holding diversifiers that look wrong at the wrong time
Why investors and advisors often want alternatives but struggle to stick with them
Timestamps:
00:00 Why trend following opportunities appear under pressure
04:39 Pro-growth positioning before the whipsaw
09:32 Short-term vs long-term trend signals
13:46 The danger of tinkering with systematic strategies
18:43 What actually changes in a durable process
23:27 Rising rates, short bonds, and collateral yield
28:00 Copper hedging and why trend followers buy rising prices
32:00 Options, insurance, and risk transfer through time
36:28 Regime shifts and supply-demand imbalances
41:00 What investors choose when asset classes are anonymized
45:11 Building a portfolio for 30-year terminal wealth
50:06 Why portfolio construction is different than judging individual strategies
56:15 Why trend following and value investing require faith
01:00:42 Reducing errors vs chasing highlight-reel winners
01:05:36 Where to follow Eric and Standpoint
Cliff Asness returns to Excess Returns for a greatest hits tour through some of his most important and entertaining investing ideas.
We discuss bubble logic, today’s AI market comparisons, why volatility still matters as a risk measure, private equity “volatility laundering,” international diversification, market timing myths, pulling the goalie, and how machine learning is changing quantitative investing.
Cliff Asness on X
https://x.com/CliffordAsness
AQR Capital Management
https://www.aqr.com/
Papers Discussed
Bubble Logic: Or, How to Learn to Stop Worrying and Love the Bull
https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Working-Paper/Bubble-Logic-Or-How-to-Learn-to-Stop-Worrying-and-Love-the-Bull
Rubble Logic: What Did We Learn From the Great Stock Market Bubble?
https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Journal-Article/Rubble-Logic
My Top 10 Peeves
https://www.aqr.com/-/media/AQR/Documents/Insights/Journal-Article/My-Top-10-Peeves.pdf
Volatility Laundering
https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Perspectives/Volatility-Laundering
I Did Not Predict What Is Going on in Privates
https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Perspectives/I-Did-Not-Predict-What-is-Going-on-in-Privates
(So) What If You Miss the Market's N Best Days?
https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Perspectives/So-What-If-You-Miss-the-Markets-N-Best-Days
International Diversification Works (Eventually)
https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Journal-Article/International-Diversification-Works-Eventually
International Diversification - Still Not Crazy after All These Years
https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Research/Journal-Article/International-Diversification-Still-Not-Crazy-after-All-These-Years
Perhaps the Most Important Essay I Will Ever Co Author
https://www.aqr.com/Insights/Perspectives/Perhaps-the-Most-Important-Essay-I-Will-Ever-Co-Author
Main topics covered:
How the dot-com bubble created its own internal logic
Why Dow 36,000 and Cisco message boards captured bubble thinking
What investors learned, and failed to learn, from the tech bubble
How today’s AI market compares with the dot-com era
Why long periods of underperformance make even good strategies hard to stick with
Why Cliff still defends volatility as a useful risk measure
Why “cash on the sidelines” is a misleading market narrative
How private equity smoothing can make risk look lower than it really is
Why the private markets debate is not a short-term prediction
Why the “missing the best 10 days” argument against market timing is incomplete
Why international diversification can still matter after decades of US outperformance
What pulling the goalie can teach investors about risk, incentives and career risk
How machine learning changes quant investing without eliminating economic intuition
Timestamps:
00:00 Why certainty is dangerous in investing
04:58 Why Bubble Logic never became a book
10:18 Cisco, Yahoo message boards and bubble psychology
14:16 Rubble Logic and the lessons investors failed to learn
18:04 What today’s AI market has in common with the dot-com bubble
22:23 Why the long run can lie to investors
26:02 Volatility, permanent loss of capital and real risk control
30:19 Why there is no cash on the sidelines
34:00 Private equity, smoothing and volatility laundering
39:47 Why Cliff did not call the private markets downturn
43:19 The flaw in the missing the best 10 days argument
49:00 Why international diversification still works eventually
53:35 Why crashes are global but lost decades are local
57:30 Pulling the goalie and asymmetric risk
01:01:00 Why coaches and investors avoid optimal decisions
01:07:36 Machine learning, overfitting and economic intuition
01:10:50 Leverage, short selling and derivatives in quant portfolios
01:16:26 Where to follow Cliff Asness
Ben Carlson joins Excess Returns to discuss his new book Risk and Reward and the biggest lessons investors can learn from market history. We cover how to think about risk, inflation, market timing, bear markets, lost decades, diversification, compounding and why surviving volatility is the key to building long-term wealth.
Ben's Book
https://amzn.to/4dFHsQz
Ben Carlson on X
https://x.com/awealthofcs
Ben's Blog
https://awealthofcommonsense.com/
Main topics covered:
Why risk is hard to define and always involves trade-offs
How vivid risks like sharks and headlines distort investor decision-making
Why doing nothing can be one of the hardest parts of investing
How inflation should be viewed through personal finance, human capital and long-term investing
Why stocks can be an inflation hedge even if they struggle during inflation spikes
Why waiting for the market coast to clear often fails
What the world’s worst market timer teaches about saving and staying invested
How loss aversion shapes investor behavior
What the Great Depression, bear markets and 30-year returns teach about long-term investing
Why there is no perfect portfolio and the best strategy is one you can actually stick with
Timestamps:
00:00 Ben Carlson on why risk and reward are attached
06:35 Doing nothing, action bias and better investing behavior
11:51 Inflation psychology and lessons from the 1970s
16:55 Why stocks can hedge inflation over the long run
21:07 Why waiting for the coast to clear is a market timing trap
26:30 Time horizons, loss aversion and portfolio behavior
31:49 Government rescue, left-tail risk and unintended consequences
35:54 Recessionary vs non-recessionary bear markets
42:09 Why the stock market and economy can diverge
47:24 Why compounding is about holding, not trading
51:37 Starting valuations, lost decades and future returns
55:40 Risk, reward and the biggest lesson for investors
AI is moving from hype to real enterprise adoption, and Gene Munster and Doug Clinton join Excess Returns to explain what that means for investors, technology stocks, energy demand, jobs and the next phase of the AI trade. We discuss why AI may still be early in its bubble cycle, how frontier models like GPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok compare, why AI-powered investing is becoming more practical, and where the biggest second-order opportunities may emerge.
Gene Munster on X
https://x.com/munster_gene
Doug Clinton on X
https://x.com/dougclinton
Deepwater Asset Management
https://www.deepwatermgmt.com/
Intelligent Alpha
https://www.intelligentalpha.co/
Main topics covered:
• Why Doug Clinton still thinks AI could become a bigger bubble than dot-com
• How Claude Code, Codex and frontier AI models are changing enterprise productivity
• The job disruption risk for knowledge workers and why AI adoption may become a survival skill
• Why the AI model race may not be winner-take-all
• How Intelligent Alpha uses large language models to evaluate stocks and earnings expectations
• Why GPT, Claude and DeepSeek perform differently across investing tasks
• The AI infrastructure boom and why energy may be one of the most underappreciated bottlenecks
• Hyperscaler CapEx, data centers and the investment case for continued AI spending
• How major AI IPOs like SpaceX, Anthropic and OpenAI could affect public markets
• Why space, orbital data centers and zero-gravity manufacturing could become real investment themes
Timestamps:
00:00 AI, electricity and intelligence
04:33 Why new AI models changed the semiconductor trade
09:14 What AI means for knowledge worker jobs
14:03 Codex, Claude Code and Google’s AI challenge
18:50 OpenAI, Apple and the model capacity race
23:03 How many frontier AI models can survive?
27:18 Intelligent Alpha’s AI earnings benchmark
31:34 Why AI investors avoid emotional bias
35:33 Where to invest in the AI stack
39:00 Why AI energy demand is still underappreciated
43:43 How markets are judging hyperscaler AI spending
48:00 The investment opportunity in space
52:20 Final thoughts and closing
Jeremy Grantham joins Excess Returns to discuss The Making of a Permabear, mean reversion, market bubbles, AI, the Magnificent 7, and the long-term lessons investors can take from his career at GMO. We cover why he rejects the simple “permabear” label, how he thinks about valuation and bubbles, why AI may be both transformative and dangerous for investors, and why long-term thinking is so hard but so essential.
The Making of a Permabear: The Perils of Long-term Investing in a Short-term World
https://groveatlantic.com/book/the-making-of-a-permabear/
GMO
https://www.gmo.com/americas/
Grantham Foundation
https://granthamfoundation.org/
Topics covered:
Why Jeremy Grantham thinks the “permabear” label misses the point
The difference between being generally bearish and making a true “abandon ship” call
Mean reversion, valuation cycles, and why history still matters for investors
Why monopoly power helped reshape U.S. profit margins and market concentration
How AI could turn today’s monopoly winners into brutal competitors
Why new technology often becomes a cost of doing business rather than a permanent profit boost
How Grantham defines bubbles using two-sigma market events
Lessons from Japan, the dot-com bubble, the housing bubble, and the 2021 speculative peak
Why institutional investors struggle to stick with value strategies during bubbles
The role of purpose, climate risk, toxicity, and long-term thinking in Grantham’s later career
The one lesson Grantham would teach ordinary investors about pessimism, realism, and time horizons
Timestamps:
00:00 Jeremy Grantham on unpleasant news and long-term investing
04:18 Reinvesting when terrified in 2009
08:43 Why Grantham told investors to abandon ship in 2008
10:28 Mean reversion and why history matters
14:00 Monopoly power, the Mag 7, and rising market concentration
17:14 Why AI is important but impossible to forecast
20:21 AI as a cost of doing business
21:24 From monopoly profits to brutal AI competition
24:05 How investors should think about valuation mean reversion
27:00 Why high returns on capital should eventually attract competition
29:47 How Grantham defines a market bubble
33:00 Japan’s extreme bubble and GMO’s zero weight decision
34:19 The dot-com bubble and the pain of being early
38:00 Grantham’s bubble warning signal in 2021
41:35 Whether today’s market is showing classic bubble behavior
43:00 QuantumScape, meme stocks, and speculative excess
46:35 How ChatGPT interrupted the 2022 bear market
49:12 Investor behavior and the cost of underperforming in a bubble
55:00 Purpose, philanthropy, climate risk, and useful work
01:01:03 The one lesson Grantham would teach average investors
Marc Rubinstein joins Excess Returns to explain what private credit, bank earnings, insurance balance sheets, fintech growth, and arbitrage firms reveal about the modern financial system. The conversation covers why private credit risks may not be systemic in the traditional banking-crisis sense, but still matter for investors because of redemption gates, hidden leverage, opaque structures, incentive conflicts, and correlations that can spike when markets are under stress.
Marc Rubinstein on X
https://x.com/MarcRuby
Net Interest
https://www.netinterest.co/
In this episode, we discuss:
Why the Fed says private credit redemption risks are limited and manageable
What Blue Owl’s redemption gates reveal about private credit liquidity
How post-2008 bank regulation pushed risk into private credit, hedge funds, trading firms, and exchanges
Why banks and private credit firms are both competitors and collaborators
The “layer cake” of leverage connecting banks, private credit, and borrowers
How HSBC’s loss tied to Atlas and MFS highlights hidden credit risks
Why insurance companies have become increasingly tied to private credit
Why rapid growth can be dangerous in financial businesses
What bank earnings show about the gap between weak consumer confidence and resilient spending
Why post-mortem reports from SVB, Credit Suisse, and other failures reveal what investors could not see in real time
How Revolut became one of the most interesting fintech stories in global banking
Why Marc calls this a potential golden age of arbitrage
What Jane Street, public BDC discounts, private asset valuations, and geopolitical fragmentation tell us about market structure
Why investors may still be too anchored to the 2008 banking playbook
Where Marc sees risk and opportunity in financials, banks, Europe, and non-bank financial institutions
Timestamps:
00:00 Private credit, hidden risks, and correlation spikes
05:03 Why Blue Owl became a private credit warning sign
10:20 How private credit grew after the 2008 financial crisis
15:30 Banks and private credit as financial “frenemies”
19:44 HSBC, Atlas, MFS, and the layer cake of leverage
24:11 Apollo, Athene, insurance assets, and private credit incentives
29:20 Why higher rates have not broken more of the financial system
33:40 Bank earnings, consumer confidence, and resilient spending
37:20 Why “I don’t know” can be a powerful signal from bank CEOs
41:46 Revolut and the ambition to build a truly global bank
47:38 Why growth can be dangerous in finance
52:19 Private assets, public BDC discounts, and arbitrage opportunities
56:34 What investors misunderstand about banks today
59:31 How Marc would think about financials as a long-short investor
From the publisher's feed
Ranked by our users in the last 21 days

3,064 Listeners

588 Listeners

946 Listeners

201 Listeners

793 Listeners

356 Listeners

298 Listeners

2,140 Listeners

206 Listeners

90 Listeners

426 Listeners

108 Listeners

266 Listeners

413 Listeners

149 Listeners