
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


A flurry of decisions this week, but few big-ticket items. Mark Joseph Stern takes us through the opinions and dissents in Flowers v Mississippi, Gundy v United States and American Legion v American Humanist Association. Dahlia Lithwick is also joined by Jed Shugerman and Andrew Kent of Fordham University Law School, two of the authors of the Harvard Law Review article, Faithful Execution and Article II, which examines whether the constitution holds the President to some higher standard than just not doing crimes.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
By Slate Podcasts4.6
32993,299 ratings
A flurry of decisions this week, but few big-ticket items. Mark Joseph Stern takes us through the opinions and dissents in Flowers v Mississippi, Gundy v United States and American Legion v American Humanist Association. Dahlia Lithwick is also joined by Jed Shugerman and Andrew Kent of Fordham University Law School, two of the authors of the Harvard Law Review article, Faithful Execution and Article II, which examines whether the constitution holds the President to some higher standard than just not doing crimes.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

9,182 Listeners

8,487 Listeners

4,052 Listeners

1,378 Listeners

2,844 Listeners

996 Listeners

1,028 Listeners

5,637 Listeners

6,290 Listeners

1,872 Listeners

53 Listeners

32,330 Listeners

2,063 Listeners

238 Listeners

23,898 Listeners

7,628 Listeners

9,521 Listeners

2,398 Listeners

1,284 Listeners

12,504 Listeners

4,641 Listeners

8,574 Listeners

1,195 Listeners

5,799 Listeners

436 Listeners

15,918 Listeners

10,531 Listeners

60 Listeners

7,093 Listeners

48 Listeners

97 Listeners

7 Listeners

130 Listeners

0 Listeners

1 Listeners