Democracy Paradox

Hélène Landemore on Democracy without Elections


Listen Later

The origin of the third wave of democratization is commonly dated to the Carnation Revolution in Portugal in 1974. The fall of the Soviet Union accelerated this process until about 2005 when the pace began to slow and it even began to reverse. But Robert Dahl thought about waves of democratization differently. He believed a democratic wave was more like a transformation. It was an intensification rather than a proliferation of democracy.

Dahl allows us to interpret the current rise of populism around the world not as a rejection of democracy, but as a challenge as democratic governance and ideals continue to evolve and transform. Or as Hélène Landemore puts it, “What you call the “crisis” of democracy can also be read as the growing pains of a system trying to adjust to the constraints of a globalized economy, an interconnected world, and rising democratic expectations.”

Hélène Landemore offers an alternative approach to imagine democratic governance. It is a democracy without elections or politicians. She calls it an Open Democracy. It relies on representative assemblies where members are selected through lottery kind of like a jury. Her approach encourages deliberation among ordinary citizens who better represent their communities and societies.

Many advocates have already embraced this novel approach. and it has already used in limited ways. We talk quite a bit about political theory, but also some real-world applications of these ideas. Indeed, Landemore has found inspiration in many of these examples like the constitutional assembly in Iceland or France’s citizen assembly on climate change. So these mini publics offer a novel way to consider the possibilities for democratic government without elections.

Hélène Landemore is an Associate Professor of Political Science at Yale University. She is the author of the book Open Democracy: Reinventing Popular Rule for the Twenty-First Century. Her research reconsiders the meaning of representation and legitimacy.

Robert Dahl was unclear of what the next transformation of democracy would become. I feel the same uncertainty. But I believe Hélène Landemore challenges us to consider new experiments in democracy happening right now. So perhaps a third transformation of democracy has already begun.

Related Content

Carolyn Hendriks, Selen Ercan and John Boswell on Mending Democracy

John Gastil and Katherine Knobloch on Citizen Initiative Review

Thoughts on Cristina Flesher Fominaya's Democracy Reloaded

Support the show

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Democracy ParadoxBy Justin Kempf

  • 4.7
  • 4.7
  • 4.7
  • 4.7
  • 4.7

4.7

77 ratings


More shows like Democracy Paradox

View all
The LRB Podcast by The London Review of Books

The LRB Podcast

314 Listeners

The Political Scene | The New Yorker by The New Yorker

The Political Scene | The New Yorker

4,111 Listeners

Conversations with Tyler by Mercatus Center at George Mason University

Conversations with Tyler

2,461 Listeners

We the People by National Constitution Center

We the People

1,110 Listeners

Conversations with Bill Kristol by Bill Kristol

Conversations with Bill Kristol

2,036 Listeners

Sinica Podcast by Kaiser Kuo

Sinica Podcast

603 Listeners

The Lawfare Podcast by The Lawfare Institute

The Lawfare Podcast

6,311 Listeners

The President’s Inbox by Council on Foreign Relations

The President’s Inbox

721 Listeners

The Good Fight by Yascha Mounk

The Good Fight

911 Listeners

ChinaTalk by Jordan Schneider

ChinaTalk

292 Listeners

Interesting Times with Ross Douthat by New York Times Opinion

Interesting Times with Ross Douthat

7,245 Listeners

The Ezra Klein Show by New York Times Opinion

The Ezra Klein Show

16,508 Listeners

Ones and Tooze by Foreign  Policy

Ones and Tooze

369 Listeners

The Foreign Affairs Interview by Foreign Affairs Magazine

The Foreign Affairs Interview

496 Listeners

Past Present Future by David Runciman

Past Present Future

350 Listeners