The upcoming evidentiary hearing for Alex Murdaugh, which will determine the possibility of a retrial, has raised profound questions about the human element in legal proceedings. Host Tony Brueski, joined by psychotherapist and author Shavaun Scott on the "Hidden Killers" podcast, delved into the complexities surrounding the case, particularly focusing on former South Carolina Supreme Court Justice Gene Toll's high burden of proof set for Murdaugh’s defense.

 Justice Toll's ruling demands that Murdaugh’s defense prove clerk of court Becky Hill’s jury tampering and its prejudicial impact against Murdaugh. Scott highlighted the immense pressure on Hill, who faces not only the jury tampering allegations but also active investigations into her office’s misuse. This scenario raises significant doubts about her ability to testify openly and honestly.

 Scott and Brueski discussed the inherent difficulties in assessing the impact of Hill's alleged comments on the jurors. Human memory is notoriously unreliable, and emotions are difficult to quantify in a legal context. As Scott pointed out, "We're influenced by subtleties all the time...things that happen that we're not even aware of." This complexity adds a layer of uncertainty to the proceedings.

 In an intriguing twist, Brueski speculated on the potential financial incentives for jurors to testify that Hill influenced their verdict. The prospect of book deals and media attention could, theoretically, sway a juror’s testimony, although there is no concrete evidence to suggest this is the case. Scott acknowledged the possibility, stating, "Everybody's got a book deal," which reflects the reality of human motivations impacting the trial's outcome.

 The conversation also touched on the limited scope of the hearing, focusing solely on jury tampering allegations. This restriction means that Hill's other alleged improprieties, such as misuse of her office, will not be considered in deciding on a retrial. This narrow focus places a significant burden on the defense to demonstrate a direct link between Hill’s actions and the jury’s decision.

 The discussion culminated in a reflection on the unpredictability of human behavior in legal settings. Scott remarked, “We’d like to think that the jury system is ideally unbiased...but I don’t think that’s the human way.” This observation underlines the inherent complexities in a case where legal procedures intersect with human emotions and motivations.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Malevolent Mormon Mommys, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com