Topics Covered

AI efficiency vs. AI opportunity in modern B2B orgs

Use cases across Claude, Gemini, Copilot, and ChatGPT

Claude for Excel outperforming native plugins

AI-powered brand visibility audits (AIO, GEO)

Building MVPs from product demos using Gemini

Automating reporting and funnel analysis with ChatGPT & Gemini

Custom GPTs for keyword analysis and lead quality reviewsAI system design in regulated or high-security environments

Framework-based AI prompting for repeatable results

Testing rigor and prompt engineering for trustable AI output

Questions This Video Helps Answer

How can B2B marketing teams use AI to save time and create net-new strategic opportunities?

What LLM (Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot) is best for specific tasks like Excel, brand analysis, or creative reviews?

How do I know if AI-generated reporting is accurate enough to trust?

What’s a good prompt structure to consistently get usable output from ChatGPT or Gemini?

How can I explain AIO (AI Optimization) visibility and results to executives?

Jobs, Roles, and Responsibilities Mentioned

Marketing teams

Sales teams

Finance and accounting departments

HR and admin functions

Demand gen strategists

Operations and supply chain leaders

AI consultants and systems integrators

Creative and copywriting leads

IT and cybersecurity teams

Executive and portfolio leadership

Key Takeaways

AI tools should be evaluated by outcome, not branding—Claude may outperform Copilot in Excel.

Reframing workflows to be AI-native rather than AI-assisted unlocks transformational gains.

Demand marketers can use LLMs to streamline reporting, extract funnel insights, and improve creative alignment.

Framework-driven prompting (like SPEC) helps generate consistent, high-trust outputs.

Custom AI workflows (e.g., for lead scoring, brand checks) can scale across clients and teams without deep coding.

Generative AI is a tool for internal enablement, not just public content.