Ipse Dixit

In a special partnership with The University of Chicago Law Review Online and the Academy for Justice, Ipse Dixit brings you a three part series on COVID-19 and Criminal Justice. This symposium of essays, hosted by The University of Chicago Law Review Online, was organized by the Academy for Justice. The contributors include leaders of criminal justice and health law centers, and scholars of criminal legal systems, whose works discuss the intersection of Criminal Justice and the COVID-19 pandemic. Contributors include Valena E. Beety (ASU), Brandon L. Garrett with Deniz Ariturk and William E. Crozier (Duke), Sharon Dolovich (UCLA), Maybell Romero (Northern Illinois), Pamela R. Metzger with Gregory J. Guggenmos (SMU Deason Center), Barry Friedman (NYU) with Robin Tholin, and Jennifer Oliva (Seton Hall).

In November, the participants joined each other online to discuss their pieces with Ipse Dixit host Maybell Romero, associate professor at Northern Illinois University College of Law. In this Episode 2 of the resulting three part series, Romero speaks with Jennifer Oliva about her piece, Policing Opioid Use Disorder in a Pandemic, and Barry Friedman about his piece, Policing the Pandemic. Oliva is an Associate Professor at Seton Hall Law where she specializes in health law and policy, FDA law, drug policy, evidence, and complex litigation. Friedman is a Professor of Law at NYU, and is the founding director of NYU’s The Policing Project, which works with all stakeholders to ensure that policing is transparent, equitable, and democratically accountable.

Oliva is on Twitter at @jenndoliva, Friedman at @barryfriedman1, and Romero at @MaybellRomero.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Remco Heesen, Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of Western Australia School of Humanities, and Liam Kofi Bright, Assistant Professor in the Department of Philosophy, Logic, and Scientific Method at the London School of Economics, discuss their article "Is Peer Review a Good Idea?," which is published in the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. They begin by explaining what peer review is, how it came to be, and what it is supposed to accomplish. They observe that peer review doesn't appear to actually deliver any of its purported benefits, and comes with many costs. They argue that we should eliminate pre-publication peer review, and use other methods of evaluating the quality of scholarship. For more information, see their subsequent article "Jury Theorems for Peer Review," which they co-authored with Marcus Arvan. Bright is on Twitter at @lastpositivist, Heesen is at @RemcoHeesen, and Arvan is at @MarcusArvan.

This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In a special partnership with The University of Chicago Law Review Online and the Academy for Justice, Ipse Dixit brings you a three part series on COVID-19 and Criminal Justice. This symposium of essays, hosted by The University of Chicago Law Review Online, was organized by the Academy for Justice. The contributors include leaders of criminal justice and health law centers, and scholars of criminal legal systems, whose works discuss the intersection of Criminal Justice and the COVID-19 pandemic. Contributors include Valena E. Beety (ASU), Brandon L. Garrett with Deniz Ariturk and William E. Crozier (Duke), Sharon Dolovich (UCLA), Maybell Romero (Northern Illinois), Pamela R. Metzger with Gregory J. Guggenmos (SMU Deason Center), Barry Friedman (NYU) with Robin Tholin, and Jennifer Oliva (Seton Hall).

In November, the participants joined each other online to discuss their pieces with Ipse Dixit host Maybell Romero, associate professor at Northern Illinois University College of Law. In this Episode 1 of the resulting three part series, Romero speaks with Sharon Dolovich about her piece, Mass Incarceration, Meet COVID-19, and Valena Beety about her piece, Pre-Trial Dismissal in the Interest of Justice: A Response to COVID-19 and Protest Arrests. Dolovich is Professor of Law at UCLA, and the founding director of the UCLA Prison Law and Policy Program, which is just entering its 7th year. She also spearheads the UCLA Law COVID-19 Behind Bars Data Project. Professor Beety is professor of law at Arizona State University Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law and the deputy director of the Academy for Justice, a criminal justice center connecting research with policy reform.

Dolovich is on Twitter at @SharonDolovich, Beety at @valenabeety, and Romero at @MaybellRomero.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Gregory M. Dickinson, a Fellow at the Stanford Law School Program in Law, Science and Technology, discusses his article "Rebooting Internet Immunity," which will be published in the George Washington Law Review. Dickinson begins by explaining what Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act does and why it was enacted. He reflects on how it has shaped the evolution of the internet, and why many people increasingly think it needs to be amended or repealed. He proposes a revision of Section 230 to focus the immunity it provides on content moderation, and not more traditional product liability claims.

This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Katya Assaf Zakharov, Assistant Professor of Law in the Hebrew University of Jerusalem Faculty of Law and the DAAD Center for German Studies, and Tim Schnetgoeke, a professional photographer, discuss their article "Reading the Illegible: Can Law Understand Graffiti?," which will be published in the Connecticut Law Review. They begin by explaining what graffiti is and what makes it unique. They observe that copyright law and other legal doctrines lack the capacity to property account for graffiti and its motives. And they argue that there should be a right to create graffiti, in order to transform urban spaces.

This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Clark Neily, Vice President for Criminal Justice at the Cato Institute, discusses his book, "Terms of Engagement: How Our Courts Should Enforce the Constitution’s Promise of Limited Government," which is published by Encounter Books. Neily begins by explaining how judges decided constitutional questions, and how they distinguish between different kinds of constitutional questions. He observes that some constitutional claims get real judicial review, and others get "fake" judicial review, under the "rational basis" test. He argues that the rational basis test is an abdication of judicial responsibility, and that it should be eliminated. Neily is on Twitter at @ConLawWarrior.

This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Virginia Postrel, an award-winning journalist and independent scholar, discusses her new book "The Fabric of Civilization: How Textiles Made the World," which is published by Basic Books. Postrel begins by explaining why fabric, a product we now take for granted, used to be very costly. She discusses the different technologies that enabled the mass-production of fiber, thread, fabric, and dyes. And she describes the social technologies that facilitated the distribution of fabric. She also reflects on the social meaning of fabric, and potential future developments in the area. Postrel is on Twitter at @vpostrel.

This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, Lori D. Johnson, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Nevada Las Vegas William S. Boyd School of Law, and Melissa Love Koenig, Associate Professor of Legal Writing at Marquette University Law School, discuss their article "Walk the Line: Aristotle & The Ethics of Narrative," which is published in the Nevada Law Journal. They observe that the power of narrative can conflict with the duty of zealous representation and the attorney's duties as an office of the court. And they explain how attorneys can draw on wisdom from Aristotle's Ethics to avoid this problem. Johnson is on Twitter at @LoriDelandeyJ.

This episode was hosted by Brian L. Frye, Spears-Gilbert Professor of Law at the University of Kentucky College of Law. Frye is on Twitter at @brianlfrye.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.