
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


There is no political topic that can get people’s blood boiling quite like partisan gerrymandering. But what do we know about how effective it is and what the data shows about its outcomes?
This week, we're re-releasing our conversation with Princeton political scientist Kosuke Imai about his paper, "Widespread Partisan Gerrymandering Mostly Cancels Nationally, But Reduces Electoral Competition.” He uses a novel methodological approach to try and document the effect of partisan gerrymandering. What he finds is surprising and may lead people who participate in it to re-think whether it’s worth the effort.
Link to paper: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2217322120
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
By University of Chicago Podcast Network4.4
161161 ratings
There is no political topic that can get people’s blood boiling quite like partisan gerrymandering. But what do we know about how effective it is and what the data shows about its outcomes?
This week, we're re-releasing our conversation with Princeton political scientist Kosuke Imai about his paper, "Widespread Partisan Gerrymandering Mostly Cancels Nationally, But Reduces Electoral Competition.” He uses a novel methodological approach to try and document the effect of partisan gerrymandering. What he finds is surprising and may lead people who participate in it to re-think whether it’s worth the effort.
Link to paper: https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2217322120
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

32,338 Listeners

9,263 Listeners

4,077 Listeners

5,138 Listeners

7,864 Listeners

10,707 Listeners

1,107 Listeners

6,321 Listeners

113,460 Listeners

561 Listeners

487 Listeners

7,264 Listeners

16,447 Listeners

472 Listeners

622 Listeners