
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us Fan Mail
Pulse Biosciences [NASDAQ: PLSE] is a medical device company with one product – the CellFX system. PLSE’s history is full of failure and wasted investors’ money trying to sell its technology for skin treatments. With the same team and approach, failure is going to repeat in the company’s pivot to cardiac ablation, or the Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) market.
PLSE is years behind Boston Scientific (Farapulse) and Medtronic (Affera and PulseSelect) in the clinical studies/FDA approval process for PFA. Farapulse’s first clinical study was launched in 2018, over five years ago.
While nano pulse PFA technology was patented by Farapulse, Farapulse does not use nano pulse. PLSE is developing nano pulse PFA technology, and could be infringing on Farapulse’s patents. Medtronic and Abbott also choose to not develop nano pulse because evidence shows it’s inferior to micro pulse.
PLSE is desperately trying to deceive investors that they are close to commercial revenue with their ablation clamp by failing to disclose that comparable clamps had to receive PMA approval from the FDA with large clinica
Support the show
By David Capablanca4.9
5252 ratings
Send us Fan Mail
Pulse Biosciences [NASDAQ: PLSE] is a medical device company with one product – the CellFX system. PLSE’s history is full of failure and wasted investors’ money trying to sell its technology for skin treatments. With the same team and approach, failure is going to repeat in the company’s pivot to cardiac ablation, or the Pulsed Field Ablation (PFA) market.
PLSE is years behind Boston Scientific (Farapulse) and Medtronic (Affera and PulseSelect) in the clinical studies/FDA approval process for PFA. Farapulse’s first clinical study was launched in 2018, over five years ago.
While nano pulse PFA technology was patented by Farapulse, Farapulse does not use nano pulse. PLSE is developing nano pulse PFA technology, and could be infringing on Farapulse’s patents. Medtronic and Abbott also choose to not develop nano pulse because evidence shows it’s inferior to micro pulse.
PLSE is desperately trying to deceive investors that they are close to commercial revenue with their ablation clamp by failing to disclose that comparable clamps had to receive PMA approval from the FDA with large clinica
Support the show

3,228 Listeners

3,347 Listeners

1,982 Listeners

2,175 Listeners

1,105 Listeners

1,416 Listeners

8,876 Listeners

942 Listeners

2,660 Listeners

10,254 Listeners

29,272 Listeners

273 Listeners

417 Listeners

2 Listeners

155 Listeners